Influence of Oxidation and Dialysis of Phlorotannins on Bioactivity and Composition of Ultrasound-Assisted Extracts from Ascophyllum nodosum

Citation: Gisbert, M.; Sineiro, J.; Moreira, R. Influence of Oxidation and Dialysis of Phlorotannins on Bioactivity and Composition of Ultrasound-Assisted Extracts from Ascophyllum nodosum.Mar. Drugs 2022,20, 706. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/md20110706 Academic Editors: Charlotte Jacobsen, Adane Tilahun Getachew and Ditte B. Hermund Received: 10 October 2022 Accepted: 7 November 2022 Published: 11 November 2022 Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). marine drugs Article Influence of Oxidation and Dialysis of Phlorotannins on Bioactivity and Composition of Ultrasound-Assisted Extracts from Ascophyllum nodosum Mauro Gisbert, Jorge Sineiro and Ramón Moreira * Chemical Engineering Department, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Vida, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain *Correspondence: ramon.mor[email protected]; Tel.: +34-881816759 Abstract: The isolation and chemical characterization of phlorotannins has gained special attention in recent years due to their specific health-promoting benefits. Flow-cell ultrasound-assisted extraction (90 W/cm 2 of sonication power, 2 min of retention time and 20 g solvent/g algae of liquid–solid ratio) was carried out by using double-distilled water (WE) and acetone:water mixture (AWE) as extraction solvents. The AWE showed a higher total polyphenols content (TPC), carbohydrates (CHOs) and antioxidant activities than WE. However, when the WE was purified by using Amberlite XAD16 column, the purified WE (PWE) showed similar a TPC, decreased CHOs and increased antioxidant activity compared to WE. The oxidation of the PWE extract was evaluated under natural, forced and severe oxidation condition for 120 h. Only severe oxidation conditions were able to significantly reduce TPC and antioxidant activities. PWE was dialyzed (20, 10, 3.5 and 2 kDa). The main bioactive fraction of phlorotannins was obtained from 10 to 20 kDa. CHOs were distributed in fractions below 20 kDa. MALDI-TOF analysis was performed for PWE, PD20 and PD2 extracts to analyze the degree of polymerization of phlorotannins, which ranged from 4 to 17 phloroglucinol units/molecule. Fragmentation patterns allowed the proximate identification of several phlorotannins in Ascophyllum nodosum extracts. Keywords: phlorotannins; oxidation; molecular size; DPPH radical scavenging activity; FTIR; 1H-NMR; bioactivity; fragmentation; size distribution 1. Introduction Phlorotannins are bioactive compounds that exclusively come from brown seaweeds (Phaeophyta) such as Ascophyllum nodosum ( A. nodosum ), which shows famous antioxidant, anti-coagulant and antitumor features, among other bioactive features [ 1 ]. Thus, A. nodosum has been proposed by several researchers as a source of bioactive components for applications in medicine, pharmaceutics, cosmetics and the food industry [2]. Phlorotannins are part of cell membranes and walls, acting as shelters against environmental stress [ 1 , 3 ], and are produced by the polymerization of the phloroglucinol molecule in the polyketide pathway reaction [ 4 ]. Phlorotannins comprise molecules with a wide range of molecular size, ranging from 0.252 up to 650 kDa [5]. These molecules are classified into six different classes [ 2 ], attending to the variations of their assembling and distribution of hydroxyl groups: eckols, fuhalols, fucophlorethols, phlorethols, fucols and carmalols (Figure 1). Phlorethols and fuhalols present aryl-ether linkages; fucols aryl-aryl bonds; and fucophlorethols, a mixture of ether and phenyl bonds. Eckols present a 1,4-dibenzodioxin unit [ 6 ]. Carmalols present a 4-dibenzodioxin unit at the third and seventh position. Eckols differ from carmalols by their lower molecular weight and by the presence of an OH group substituted at the fourth carbon [ 7 ]. Fuhalols differ from phlorethols by their regular sequence of paraand ortho-ether bonds, by the presence Mar. Drugs 2022,20, 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20110706 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/marinedrugs Mar. Drugs 2022,20, 706 2 of 18 of additional OH groups in every third ring and by the lack of one or more OH groups in the whole molecule [2]. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, x 2 of 21 by the presence of additional OH groups in every third ring and by the lack of one or more OH groups in the whole molecule [2]. Figure 1. Phlorotannin main structures derived from phloroglucinol polyketide pathway reaction (adapted from Ford et al. [2]). Phlorotannins’ composition still remains scarcely studied, and very few commercial standards are available in the market [3]. Several isolation methods have been reported in the literature, but, in nature, these components are mainly high-molecular-weight polymers, and a depolymerization process is necessary [1–3,6]. Phlorotannins oxidation can be developed in seaweed tissues; this fact is suggested as one of the main steps in the complexation with carbohydrates or proteins during the formation of the cell membranes and walls [8,9]. Additionally, seaweeds’ processing (milling, drying, extraction and preservation) conditions can promote these reactions [10]. Xu et al. [11] suggested the degree of oxidation can be used as variable to control the bioactivity of phlorotannin itself, or to modify color or taste, as is performed in the production of tea, cacao or wine [12]. Quinones are the oxidized form of phlorotannins, and they partially maintain the bioactivity of original phloroglucinol derivatives; however, this fact is still unclear [13]. Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) is highly effective to produce antioxidant-enriched extracts because it offers high operation reproducibility; offers reduced extraction time and solvent and energy consumption; allows for a continuous flow; and requires easy-to-manage and not-so-costly equipment [14,15]. Indeed, UAE is considered a novel and eco-friendly technique by the United States Environmental Protection Agency [16]. Phlorotannins’ extraction could be carried out with water, the safest solvent according to green chemistry principles, as a unique solvent [17]. Nonetheless, water shows lower extraction yields compared with organo-solvents, such as acetone or alcohols [4,17– 20]. Moreover, water simultaneously solubilizes polysaccharides and proteins, producing extracts formed by a complex mixture of compounds [19]. It is not clear whether the extraction with organic solvents can promote the extraction of unbound phlorotannins [18] or, alternatively, if organo-solvents reduce the formation of phlorotannins complexes after they are extracted [4,21]. Thus, the selection of solvent type is critical and must be carried out with a higher polyphenol content, higher antioxidant activity and lower cost and time-consumption, together with the final use of phlorotannins [4,19]. Figure 1. Phlorotannin main structures derived from phloroglucinol polyketide pathway reaction (adapted from Ford et al. [2]). Phlorotannins’ composition still remains scarcely studied, and very few commercial standards are available in the market [ 3 ]. Several isolation methods have been reported in the literature, but, in nature, these components are mainly high-molecular-weight polymers, and a depolymerization process is necessary [1–3,6]. Phlorotannins oxidation can be developed in seaweed tissues; this fact is suggested as one of the main steps in the complexation with carbohydrates or proteins during the formation of the cell membranes and walls [ 8 , 9 ]. Additionally, seaweeds’ processing (milling, drying, extraction and preservation) conditions can promote these reactions [ 10 ]. Xu et al. [ 11 ] suggested the degree of oxidation can be used as variable to control the bioactivity of phlorotannin itself, or to modify color or taste, as is performed in the production of tea, cacao or wine [ 12 ]. Quinones are the oxidized form of phlorotannins, and they partially maintain the bioactivity of original phloroglucinol derivatives; however, this fact is still unclear [13]. Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) is highly effective to produce antioxidantenriched extracts because it offers high operation reproducibility; offers reduced extraction time and solvent and energy consumption; allows for a continuous flow; and requires easy-to-manage and not-so-costly equipment [ 14 , 15 ]. Indeed, UAE is considered a novel and eco-friendly technique by the United States Environmental Protection Agency [16]. Phlorotannins’ extraction could be carried out with water, the safest solvent according to green chemistry principles, as a unique solvent [ 17 ]. Nonetheless, water shows lower extraction yields compared with organo-solvents, such as acetone or alcohols [4,17–20] . Moreover, water simultaneously solubilizes polysaccharides and proteins, producing extracts formed by a complex mixture of compounds [19]. It is not clear whether the extraction with organic solvents can promote the extraction of unbound phlorotannins [ 18 ] or, alternatively, if organo-solvents reduce the formation of phlorotannins complexes after they are extracted [ 4 , 21 ]. Thus, the selection of solvent type is critical and must be carried out with a higher polyphenol content, higher antioxidant activity and lower cost and time-consumption, together with the final use of phlorotannins [4,19]. Mar. Drugs 2022,20, 706 3 of 18 The wide range of molecular sizes of phlorotannins (and/or complexation state) makes their separation, purification and characterization difficult due to the oligomeric structure and similar polarity of those biopolymers [ 5 ]. It was reported that the antioxidant capacities of phlorotannins are related to their structure and molecular size (degree of polymerization); in fact, oligomeric phlorotannins are generally more active than highly polymerized compounds [9]. The aim of the study was to generate phlorotannin-enriched extracts from A. nodosum by using methods based on both size (using different cutoff dialysis membranes) and oxidation state. Phlorotannins-enriched extracts were separated through dialysis membranes with different cutoff values, and the corresponding fractions were chemically analyzed. Additionally, the oxidation of phlorotannin-enriched fraction was studied to assess the resistance to oxidation of phlorotannins. Major components indicative of separation efficiency and bioactivity (total polyphenols content (TPC), total carbohydrates (CHOs) and DPPH radical scavenging activity (RSA)) were determined. Several spectrometry techniques (NMR, FTIR and MALDI–TOF) and a chromatography (RP-HPLC) analysis of the extracts were employed to support the identification of some phlorotannins in the different extracts and fractions. 2. Results and Discussion 2.1. Bioactivity Characterization Several phytochemical fractions were obtained from A. nodosum . Firstly, crude extracts were obtained from water (WE) and acetone:water (AWE) extraction; thereafter, the WE was purified by using an Amberlite XAD16 column to reduce the carbohydrates content (i.e., alginate isoforms) [ 10 ], and the purified WE fraction (PWE) was obtained. PWEs were subjected to several oxidation treatments, employing air (natural (PON) and forced aeration (POA)) and hydrogen peroxide (POP). Finally, PWEs were dialyzed by using 2–20 kDa cutoff cassettes that were given additional extracts (PD20, PD10, PD3 and PD2). The experimental values of the total polyphenol content (TPC), total carbohydrate content (CHOs) and antioxidant activity by DPPH scavenging method (RSA) of obtained extracts are shown in Figure 2. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, x 4 of 21 Figure 2. Phytochemical and antioxidant activity (TPC (A), CHOs (B) and DPPH RSA (C)) of crude (AWE and WE), purified (PWE), oxidized (PON, POA and POP) and dialyzed (PD20, PD10, PD3 and PD2) extracts. Different superscript letters indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among values. Error bars correspond to standard deviations of measures. Hence, when PWE was compared with AWE, the ratios (±0.1) corresponding to TPC (TPC AWE /TPC PWE ) and CHOs (CHOs AWE /CHOs PWE ) were 3.9-fold and 2.4-fold lower, respectively, but RSA (RSA AWE /RSA PWE ) was just 1.2-fold lower. These results evidenced that water permitted the extraction of phlorotannins with affinities for carbohydrates that significantly reduced the antioxidant activity of WE, as was also previously observed by Aleixandre et al. [10]; some authors referred to them as phlorotannin–carbohydrate complexes [19]. Thus, the purification of WE is highly recommended in order to achieve extracts that are comparable to AWE. Indeed, in previous studies, it was reported that Amberlite purification increased both the antioxidant and amylaseand glucosidase-enzymeinhibiting activities of extracted polyphenols [10]. Thus, PWE extract, as an eco-friendlier option, was selected for further oxidation assays and dialysis to determine how bioactivity depends on the oxidation state and/or molecular size. Catarino et al. [19] obtained Fucus vesiculosus extracts, and Wang et al. [22] obtained A. nodosum extracts, with TPC values of 0.86 and 0.28 g PE/L, respectively. Both authors studied phlorotannins’ extraction with 70% (v/v) acetone:water solution with conventional solid–liquid extraction, at a liquid–solid ratio of 20 g solvent/g algae for 24, at RT. The TPC values were significantly lower despite the very long conventional extraction (24 h) employed in comparison to values achieved in this study (5.67 ± 0.08 g PE/L) with UAE method. Zhang et al. [23] obtained similar TPC values of 5.6 g PE/L, applying conventional solid–liquid extraction, but employing 12.5 g solvent/g algae as the liquid–solid ratio, using water–ethanol (50% v/v) as the solvent and A. nodosum seaweed during long extraction times (90 min) and at a high temperature (80 °C). Ummat et al. [24] obtained extracts with TPC values of 4.8 g PE/L, using water–ethanol (50% v/v) as solvent, 10 g solvent/g algae as the liquid–solid ratio and long UAE times (30 min) from Fucus vesiculosus seaweed. Figure 2. Phytochemical and antioxidant activity (TPC ( A ), CHOs ( B ) and DPPH RSA ( C )) of crude (AWE and WE), purified (PWE), oxidized (PON, POA and POP) and dialyzed (PD20, PD10, PD3 and PD2) extracts. Different superscript letters indicate significant (p< 0.05) differences among values. Error bars correspond to standard deviations of measures. Mar. Drugs 2022,20, 706 4 of 18 The TPC values (Figure 2A) of crude extracts varied over a wide range, between 1.54 ±0.14 and 5.67 ± 0.08 g PE/L; CHO values were in the range of 0.61 ± 0.05 to 0.88 ±0.02 g GE/L ; and RSA values were between 1.38 ± 0.08 and 1.88 ± 0.05 g TE/L. The highest content was obtained for AWE, evidencing the notorious effect of the extracting solvent type. Despite the fact that the AWE extract showed a higher TPC value, its antioxidant activity was not so notorious as could be expected (Figure 2C) when compared with that of WE. Hence, the AWE extract also showed a higher carbohydrate content than WE, evidencing that acetone:water 70% v/v is not so selective for polyphenols’ extraction as has been reported in several studies [ 4 , 18 ]. The AWE/WE calculated TPC ratio was 3.7 (Figure 2A), which was much higher than that obtained for CHOs (1.5, Figure 2B) and RSA values (1.4, Figure 2C). These results indicate that further separation of phlorotannins from carbohydrates (i.e., purification) is necessary to remove carbohydrates, mainly uronic acids in A. nodosum , when ultrasound-assisted extraction is performed, even when an acetone:water mixture is used as the solvent. From these results, WE was selected to be purified and to carry out further oxidation assays and fractioning by dialysis, because it is a reliable, cheap and food-friendlier solvent, as compared with acetone. PWE showed a similar TPC (TPC = 1.44 ± 0.02 g PE/L, PWE/WE = 1.1-fold higher) and RSA values (1.53 ± 0.09 g TE/L, 1.1-fold higher) to WE; however, with a significantly lower content of CHOs (0.36 ±0.02 g GE/L, 1.8-fold lower). Hence, when PWE was compared with AWE, the ratios ( ± 0.1) corresponding to TPC (TPC AWE /TPC PWE ) and CHOs (CHOs AWE /CHOs PWE ) were 3.9-fold and 2.4-fold lower, respectively, but RSA (RSA AWE /RSA PWE ) was just 1.2-fold lower. These results evidenced that water permitted the extraction of phlorotannins with affinities for carbohydrates that significantly reduced the antioxidant activity of WE, as was also previously observed by Aleixandre et al. [ 10 ]; some authors referred to them as phlorotannin–carbohydrate complexes [19] . Thus, the purification of WE is highly recommended in order to achieve extracts that are comparable to AWE. Indeed, in previous studies, it was reported that Amberlite purification increased both the antioxidant and amylaseand glucosidase-enzymeinhibiting activities of extracted polyphenols [ 10 ]. Thus, PWE extract, as an eco-friendlier option, was selected for further oxidation assays and dialysis to determine how bioactivity depends on the oxidation state and/or molecular size. Catarino et al. [ 19 ] obtained Fucus vesiculosus extracts, and Wang et al. [ 22 ] obtained A. nodosum extracts, with TPC values of 0.86 and 0.28 g PE/L, respectively. Both authors studied phlorotannins’ extraction with 70% (v/v) acetone:water solution with conventional solid–liquid extraction, at a liquid–solid ratio of 20 g solvent/g algae for 24, at RT. The TPC values were significantly lower despite the very long conventional extraction (24 h) employed in comparison to values achieved in this study (5.67 ± 0.08 g PE/L) with UAE method. Zhang et al. [ 23 ] obtained similar TPC values of 5.6 g PE/L, applying conventional solid–liquid extraction, but employing 12.5 g solvent/g algae as the liquid–solid ratio, using water–ethanol (50% v/v) as the solvent and A. nodosum seaweed during long extraction times (90 min) and at a high temperature (80 ◦ C). Ummat et al. [ 24 ] obtained extracts with TPC values of 4.8 g PE/L, using water–ethanol (50% v/v) as solvent, 10 g solvent/g algae as the liquid–solid ratio and long UAE times (30 min) from Fucus vesiculosus seaweed. Consequently, both authors reported close values to AWE extract (5.67 ± 0.08 g PE/L) but employing a higher temperature, longer time and lower liquid–solid ratio. In the present research, limited oxidation of the PWE extract was performed under oxidation conditions varying from soft PON and POA to severe POP, with the aim of evaluating the extract’s remaining antioxidant activity in order to evaluate sensitivity of the phlorotannins-enriched extracts. The oxidation of PWE yielded outstanding results; The TPC values (Figure 2A) of oxidized extracts varied in a wide range, from a minimum value for POP (0.06 ± 0.001 g PE/L) to both PON and POA (1.4 ± 0.04). Regarding the PWE sample, natural and air-driven oxidation conditions caused minimal TPC reduction in both samples (1.6-fold lower), whereas POP showed a sharp TPC change (25-fold lower). Conversely, the CHOs’ results (Figure 2B) showed no significant (p< 0.05) differences Mar. Drugs 2022,20, 706 5 of 18 among all oxidation assays (PON, POA and POP), with minor changes concerning the PWE extract (0.36 ± 0.02 g GE/L), with only 1.1-fold higher values, because the carbohydrates were not oxidable by hydrogen peroxide or oxygen in the assay conditions here applied. Nevertheless, the RSA values (Figure 2C) showed that all oxidation procedures had a notorious effect on antioxidant activity, for which the values varied from 0.05 ± 0.01 (POP) up to 0.27 ± 0.04 g TE/L (PON and POA), in contrast with an original value of PWE ( 1.53 g TE/L ). Oxidation had a dramatic effect on antioxidant activity, reducing the RSA values by around 5.7-fold for PON and POA and around 30-fold for POP. The oxidation conditions indicate that polyphenols maintained their structure and content (TPC values), but their antioxidant capacities (RSA values) were reduced. Indeed, these results could also be used to assess the adequacy of the determination methods for screening antioxidants, whereas the TPC method could not show different values due to the existence of partially oxidized phlorotannins. Dialysis of PWE extract was carried out throughout 20 (PD20), 10 (PD10), 3.5 (PD3) and 2 kDa (PD2) cutoff dialysis cassettes. The TPC values (Figure 2A) varied between 0.22 ±0.01 (PD10, PD3 and PD2) and 0.84 ± 0.01 g PE/L (PD20). Similarly, RSA (Figure 2C ) showed the highest valuesfor PD20 (0.96 ± 0.02 g GE/L)andthe other dialysates ( 0.14 ±0.01 ). These results indicated that polyphenol molecules with sizes ranging from 2 up to 10 kDa were practically negligible (together with the obviously corresponding antioxidant activity). Finally, CHOs’ (Figure 2B) values increased with a dialysis cutoff size from 0.07 ±0.01 (PD2) up to 0.36 ± 0.01 g GE/L (PD20). These results agree with those reported by Hermund et al. [ 25 ], who proposed that the relationship between bioactivity and molecular size is related to the enclosed structure of each phlorotannin and the amount unavailable OH-groups, both of which are dependent on the branching of the phlorotannins. To compare the phytochemical composition data with other studies the percentage distribution of TPC, CHOs and RSA among the dialyzed fractions was calculated (Figure 3), assuming the total to be the content determined from PWE (TPC = 1.44 ± 0.020 g PE/L; RSA = 1.53 ± 0.09 and CHOs = 0.36 ± 0.02 g GE/L). CHOs were distributed between 0 and 20 kDa , in the following mode: <2 kDa fraction accounted for 19.4 ± 2.0% of CHOs; 2–3.5 kDa fraction rendered 16.7 ± 1.2%; 3.5–10 kDa fraction was the major fraction, accounting for 38.9 ± 1.5%; the 10–20 kDa fraction accounted for 25 ± 1.1%; and the negligible CHOs percentage was detected in the fraction with size higher than 20 kDa (0.2 ± 0.07%) (Figure 3). 1 Figure 3. Distribution percentage of TPC, CHO and DPPH RSA values among dialyzed extracts. Different letters above bars mean that average values are significantly different (p> 0.95). Mar. Drugs 2022,20, 706 6 of 18 In previous research in our laboratory, it was determined that the size of polymeric alginates extracted from A. nodosum after phlorotannins UAE ranged from 133 to 428 kDa [26] . However, no signals were obtained for sizes higher than 20 kDa, evidencing that purification and molecular size cutoff dialysis removed high-molecular-size alginic forms, and then CHOs’ signals corresponded to their smaller-sized oligomers that were found in all cutoff ranges. The TPC and RSA analyses considering polyphenols’ molecular size distribution determined the existence of three main regions: lower than 2 kDa (8.5 ± 1.0 and 9.2 ±1.7% ), between 10 and 20 kDa (49.7 ± 0.2 and 53.6 ± 0.6%) and larger than 20 kDa (41.8 ± 1.7 and 37.3 ± 2.8%). These results showed that the largest population (around 50% of total TPC of the purified extract) and the most bioactive fraction (>53% of total RSA of the purified extract) was found at the 10–20 kDa range. These observations agreed with several authors who reported that the larger phlorotannins were the main bioactive compounds in the seaweeds, such as Audibert et al. [ 27 ], who found that polyphenol fractions >50kDa showed the highest antioxidant activity, and Connan et al. [ 28 ], who reported that higher bioactivities were obtained when dialyzed extracts were around 100 kDa. Nevertheless, both Tierney et al. [ 3 ] and Kubanek et al. [ 29 ] reported that phlorotannins from A. nodosum and Fucus vesiculosus were around 3.5–100 kDa (40–60% of polyphenols), and at least 32% of molecules were higher than 100 kDa. Paiva et al. [ 30 ], after investigating Fucus spiralis extracts, also reported that the highest bioactive fraction was obtained with 3 kDa ultra-filtrated extract. Bogolitsyn et al. [ 31 ] studied the molecular size of phlorotannins from Fucus vesiculosus seaweed, and it ranged from 8.7 to 49.3 kDa. They determined that the highest TPC value (0.98 g PE/g extract) was achieved with a fraction around 30 kDa, whereas the highest antioxidant activity (0.91 g AAE/g extract, expressed as g ascorbic acid equivalents per g extract) was obtained from the 14.5 kDa fraction, demonstrating that the fraction ranging from 8 to 18 kDa was the most active. The current study is agreement with these author’s findings, explaining the lower bioactivity of high-molecular-size phlorotannins due to conformational changes caused by the formation of intraand inter-molecular bonds (i.e., bioaccessibility to phlorotannins is limited with their high molecular fractions). Then, to achieve the isolation and/or identification of the main phlorotannins group that provided the best results, additional characterization techniques were applied. 2.2. Chromatographic Characterization Nowadays there are no commercially available standards for phlorotannin polymers; resorcinol and phloroglucinol are usually employed [ 8 ]. Representative major compounds found in seaweeds were injected to test the elution pattern and deduce where oligomers of sugars, uronic acids, proteins and phlorotannin could be found. Additionally, the extracts’ profiles were compared with commercial D-(+)-glucose, D-(+)-glucuronic acid, bovine serum albumin (BSA), resorcinol and phloroglucinol to determine sugar/protein presence. The retention times (tR) of assayed standard compounds were 16.5, 19.1, 52.0, 52.1 and 52.1 min for glucuronic acid, glucose, phloroglucinol, BSA and resorcinol, respectively (Figure 4A). Detection was carried out at 266 nm and reported as maximal phloroglucinol absorption light [ 18 ]. Non-phenolic standards produced a much more minor signal compared with the prominent peaks observed from resorcinol and phloroglucinol (Figure 4A, Figure S1 for more detailed information at full scale), thus confirming that the main signals obtained from RP-HPLC could be assumed to be phlorotannins isomers. The chromatograms of the extracts (Figure 4B,C) showed three clearly defined regions, as is common in all extracts, meaning that three main groups of molecules (i.e., same retention time) were present in all extracts with different content values (i.e., different peak intensity). The variation of signal intensities evidenced that the use of different solvents and subsequent post-treatments modified the phlorotannin profiles. Mar. Drugs 2022,20, 706 7 of 18 Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, x 7 of 21 of sugars, uronic acids, proteins and phlorotannin could be found. Additionally, the extracts’ profiles were compared with commercial D-(+)-glucose, D-(+)-glucuronic acid, bovine serum albumin (BSA), resorcinol and phloroglucinol to determine sugar/protein presence. The retention times (tR) of assayed standard compounds were 16.5, 19.1, 52.0, 52.1 and 52.1 min for glucuronic acid, glucose, phloroglucinol, BSA and resorcinol, respectively (Figure 4A). Detection was carried out at 266 nm and reported as maximal phloroglucinol absorption light [18]. Non-phenolic standards produced a much more minor signal compared with the prominent peaks observed from resorcinol and phloroglucinol (Figure 4A, Figure S1 for more detailed information at full scale), thus confirming that the main signals obtained from RP-HPLC could be assumed to be phlorotannins isomers. Figure 4. RP-HPLC–UV profiles (266 nm) of (A) standard compounds (phloroglucinol, resorcinol, glucose, glucuronic acid and BSA); (B) crude and purified (AWE, WE and PWE), (C) oxidized, (PON, POA and POP) and dialyzed (PD20, PD10, PD3 and PD2) extracts. The chromatograms of the extracts (Figure 4B,C) showed three clearly defined regions, as is common in all extracts, meaning that three main groups of molecules (i.e., same retention time) were present in all extracts with different content values (i.e., different peak intensity). The variation of signal intensities evidenced that the use of different solvents and subsequent post-treatments modified the phlorotannin profiles. Peak 1 (tR = 16 ± 3 min) corresponded to the set of polar components that gave some absorbance at 266 nm and matched with glucose and glucuronic acid tR values. This peak was associated with the presence of oligosaccharides or proteins with low affinity that elute rapidly. Peak 2 (tR = 53 ± 2 min) corresponded to main phlorotannin isomers with relative similar affinity compound for C18 column that coincided with tR values of phloroglucinol and resorcinol standard injections. Additionally, Peak 2 was in all samples; it is the most notorious peak in comparison to Peaks 1 and 3. Finally, Peak 3 (tR = 91 ± 6 Figure 4. RP-HPLC–UV profiles (266 nm) of ( A ) standard compounds (phloroglucinol, resorcinol, glucose, glucuronic acid and BSA); ( B ) crude and purified (AWE, WE and PWE), ( C ) oxidized, (PON, POA and POP) and dialyzed (PD20, PD10, PD3 and PD2) extracts. Peak 1 (tR = 16 ± 3 min) corresponded to the set of polar components that gave some absorbance at 266 nm and matched with glucose and glucuronic acid tR values. This peak was associated with the presence of oligosaccharides or proteins with low affinity that elute rapidly. Peak 2 (tR = 53 ± 2 min) corresponded to main phlorotannin isomers with relative similar affinity compound for C18 column that coincided with tR values of phloroglucinol and resorcinol standard injections. Additionally, Peak 2 was in all samples; it is the most notorious peak in comparison to Peaks 1 and 3. Finally, Peak 3 (tR = 91 ± 6 min) was associated with a high affinity for the column, assumed as high-molecular-size oligomers that eluted in a hump [18]. AWE showed a more intense Peak 2 signal compared with WE that, together with TPC values (Figure 2A), corroborated that acetone:water was a more efficient solvent for polyphenols’ extraction than water; however, PWE showed a prominent Peak 2 signal like AWE did. The differences between AWE and WE were related to their different content of phlorotannin–carbohydrate complexes. Tierney et al. [ 3 ] also reported no significant difference between water and the ethanol–water mixture, thus evidencing that the phlorotannins’ profile was not much different. Extraction with water or acetone:water produced co-extracted carbohydrates (Figure 2B); however, Peak 1 (Figure 4B) signals were hindered by the prominent signal of Peak 2. CHOs’ reduction after purification increased the amount of phlorotannin capable of interacting with the column (Peak 2) provided by the PWE sample. All oxidized PWEs (PON, POA and POP) showed a Peak 2 that was present in all samples, but its signal intensity was notoriously reduced because of the partial loss of OH groups (Figure 4C). Peak 3 signals did not show significant changes among oxidized samples. It was Peak 2 that showed the main difference among extracts (PON > POA > POP ) after oxidation, whichreduced the signals of each treatment. The RP-HPLC results ( Figure 3C ) allowed us to differentiate between both soft oxidation conditions, where POA showed a major reduction in Peak 2 than just natural oxidation. Finally, and according to phy- Mar. Drugs 2022,20, 706 8 of 18 tochemical characterizations (Figure 2), the POP extract showed a lower intensity peak concerning the PON, POA and PWE extracts. This effect evidenced that the bioactivity, together with the chemical nature of the POP sample, was altered after this more severe oxidation treatment. All dialyzed PWE fractions (PD20 > PD10 > PD3 > PD2) showed lower peak signals than the original PWE (Figure 4C). Lower Peak 2 intensity of PD20 corroborated the proposed distribution of TPC and RSA values (49.7% and 53.6%), where the main bioactive fraction was found in the range from 10 to 20 kDa. Peak 1 signals were related to different small alginate oligomers that were still present after both treatments (dialysis and oxidation) of PWE, and their presence was shown in Figure 4C. 2.3. Spectroscopic Characterization 2.3.1. FTIR The FTIR technique was used to appreciate the notorious differences among assayed extracts, such as the number of peaks (due to chemical reactions), peak intensities (differences in compounds content) and peak shapes (presence of similar groups). The FTIR spectra for crude (AWE and WE), purified (PWE), oxidized (POP) and dialyzed (PD20 and PD2) extracts are shown in Figure 5. Oxidized POA and PON did not show significant differences with PWE, and dialyzed samples PD10 and PD3 showed similar spectra to PD2. Three regions were evaluated as the main characteristic signals from polyphenolic compounds: Region 1 located around 2900 cm −1 , Region 2 around 1600 cm −1 and Region 3 around 1100 cm −1 . Region 1 was related to the vibrational stretch of interand intramolecular hydroxyl groups. Hence, these peaks are often used as criterion to measure the strength of the hydrogen bonding of polar molecules [ 32 ]. Region 2 corresponded to phlorotannins and alginate signals. The 1700 and 1600 cm −1 are signals associated with arylaryl and ethyl ether bonds, both formed during the polymerization of phloroglucinol in the formation of phlorotannins. Thus, FTIR did not permit us to discern among phlorotannin families [33]. The FTIR spectra from two crude extracts (WE and AWE) showed several peaks in AWE slightly observed in WE (Figure 5). When Region 1 was analyzed, the spectrum of AWE showed three peaks, namely at 2830, 2910 and 3000 cm −1 , whereas only the last two peaks were observed in the spectrum of WE. The peak around 3000 cm −1 showed a lower intensity in WE compared to AWE; this change was associated with the hydrogen bonding between phlorotannins and water, forming adducts that could explain the high intensity in WE rather than AWE. The prominent peak around 2830 cm −1 observed in AWE that was negligible in all the other samples was associated with traces of acetone. The signal around 2910 cm −1 could be explained as hydrogen bonding between phlorotannins and carbohydrates (and/or alginates). AWE showed a relevant CHOs value, as WE did (Figure 2B), due to the lack of selectivity of UAE [ 17 ]. However, the 2910 cm −1 signal was dramatically reduced in PWE because of the removal of carbohydrates and alginate isoforms after purification treatment [ 10 ]. This fact was confirmed in oxidized and dialyzed extracts because this signal was minimally detected (Figure 5). The three signals in Region 1 were scarcely observed in the dialyzed samples. PD20 maintained the peak corresponding to water content at 3400 cm −1 ; however, PD2 showed a displaced signal that hindered hydrogen bonds’ signals in Region 1. This result was explained by the high accessibility of small phlorotannins (PD2) that can interact with solvent traces and sugars. Region 2 is the characteristic zone of stretching vibrations of C=C bonds of aromatic rings, with signals of carboxylic acids, aldehydes and/or ketones [ 33 ]. Indeed, a 1600 cm −1 signal is associated with the asymmetric stretching vibrations of carboxylate vibration in alginic acid [ 26 ]. Then these signals at 1700 and 1600 cm −1 were associated with the presence of phlorotannins and alginate oligomers in the extracts. The crude extracts’ (AWE and WE) analysis showed similar intensities in phlorotannin content, thus differing from the TPC results (Figure 2A). A signal at 1700 cm −1 corresponded to different oxidation Mar. Drugs 2022,20, 706 9 of 18 states that could be present in the enriched phlorotannin extracts. The PWE and PD20 samples showed similar intensity for the signal at 1700 cm −1 that increased in POP and PD2 samples. Similar FTIR spectra of POP and PD2, together with results of TPC (Figure 2A), RSA (Figure 2C) and Peak 2 of chromatograms (Figure 4B,C), suggested that the 1700 cm −1 signal was due to higher content in oxidized phlorotannin forms. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, x 9 of 21 Figure 5. FTIR spectra of crude (AWE and WE), purified (PWE), oxidized (POP) and dialyzed (PD20 and PD2) extracts. Figure 5. FTIR spectra of crude (AWE and WE), purified (PWE), oxidized (POP) and dialyzed (PD20 and PD2) extracts. Mar. Drugs 2022,20, 706 16 of 18 for samples PWE, PD20 and PD2 to assess the range of mass fragmentation. The equipment used was Bruker Ultraflex III TOF/TOF equipped with a N 2 laser of 337 nm, 1 µ m of laser beam diameter and operated in positive mode. MALDI–TOF-MS spectra data treatment was carried out with data-analysis software (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). MALDI–TOF-MS analysis was performed by following a protocol that was previously proposed [10]. 3.12. Statistical Analysis Statistical analyses were carried out by using IBM SPSS statistics 27 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was assessed based on a confidence interval of 95% (p< 0.05), using a Duncan test. The experimental results were treated and plotted on Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). All experimental results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation of triplicate experiments. 4. Conclusions Bioactive (TPC, CHOs and RSA), chromatographic (RP-HPLC) and spectroscopic (FTIR, 1H-NMR and MALDI-TOF-MS) results confirmed that aqueous mixture of acetone (AWE) was a better extractant of phlorotannins than water (WE), but it renders an extract with a significant amount of carbohydrates. Purification of extract (PWE) reduced the carbohydrate content (i.e., removing high-molecular-size alginate oligomers), leaving a similar polyphenol content but with higher antioxidant activities than WE and comparable to AWE. Radical scavenging activity (RSA) was maintained after oxidation with air and only hydrogen peroxide oxidation (POP) was able to achieve a significant oxidation of phlorotannins in PWE extract. The analysis of dialyzed extracts showed that phlorotannins with a molecular size in the range of 10–20 kDa were main bioactive phlorotannins, with TPC and RSA values of 49.7 and 53.6%, respectively. Hence, the lowest-molecular-size extract (PD2) showed low bioactivity, which was in the range that of oxidized POP. Future work will involve a more in-depth profiling analysis of the phlorotannins to assist in the complete characterization of their structures partially subjected to controlled oxidation. Supplementary Materials: The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10 .3390/md20110706/s1, Figure S1: Detailed full-scale RP-HPLC–UV profiles (266 nm) of (A) standard compounds (phloroglucinol, resorcinol, glucose, glucuronic acid and BSA); (B) crude and purified (AWE, WE and PWE), (C) oxidized, (PON, POA and POP) and dialyzed (PD20, PD10, PD3 and PD2) extracts. Author Contributions: M.G., conceptualization, data curation, formalanalysis, investigation, methodology, software; and roles/writing—original draft; J.S., writing—review and editing; R.M., conceptualization, formal analysis, funding acquisition, project administration, resources, supervision, validation, and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) of European Union by the research project (RTI2018–095919–B– C2) and Xunta de Galicia, Spain (Consolidation Project ED431B 2019/01). Data Availability Statement: Data are available in the present paper and as supplementary material. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. Mar. Drugs 2022,20, 706 17 of 18 References 1. Koivikko, R.; Loponen, J.; Honkanen, T.; Jormalainen, V. Contents of soluble, cell–wall–bound, and exuded phlorotannins in the brown alga Fucus vesiculosus, with implications on their ecological functions. J. Chem. Ecol. 2005 ,31, 195–212. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 2. Ford, L.; Theodoridou, K.; Sheldrake, G.N.; Walsh, P.J. A critical review of analytical methods used for the chemical characterisation and quantification of phlorotannin compounds in brown seaweeds. Phytochem. Anal. 2019 ,30, 587–599. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 3. Tierney, M.S.; Smyth, T.J.; Rai, D.K.; Soler–Vila, A.; Croft, A.K.; Brunton, N. Enrichment of polyphenol contents and antioxidant activities of Irish brown macroalgae using food–friendly techniques based on polarity and molecular size. Food Chem. 2013 ,139, 753–761. [CrossRef] 4. Koivikko, R.; Loponen, J.; Honkanen, T.; Jormalainen, V. High–performance liquid chromatographic analysis of phlorotannins from the brown alga Fucus vesiculosus.Phytochem. Anal. 2007,18, 326–332. [CrossRef] 5. Parys, S.; Rosenbaum, A.; Kehraus, S.; Reher, G.; Glombitza, K.W.; König, G.M. Evaluation of quantitative methods for the determination of polyphenols in algal extracts. J. Nat. Prod. 2007,70, 1865–1870. [CrossRef] 6. Singh, I.; Bharate, S. Phlorogucinol compounds of natural origin. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006,23, 558–591. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 7. Shibata, T.; Kawaguchi, S.; Hama, Y.; Inagaki, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Nakamura, T. Local and chemical distribution of phlorotannins in brown algae. J. App. Phycol. 2004,16, 291–296. [CrossRef] 8. Steevensz, A.J.; MacKinnon, S.L.; Hankinson, R.; Craft, C.; Connan, S.; Stengel, D.B.; Melansona, J.E. Profiling phlorotannins in brown macroalgae by liquid chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry. Phytochem. Anal. 2012 ,23, 547–553. [CrossRef] 9. Breton, F.; Cérantola, S.; Ar Gall, E. Distribution and radical scavenging activity of phenols in Ascophyllum nodosum (Phaeophyceae). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2011,399, 167–172. [CrossRef] 10. Aleixandre, A.; Gisbert, M.; Sineiro, J.; Moreira, R.; Rosell, C.M. In vitro inhibition of starch digestive enzymes by ultrasound– assisted extracted polyphenols from Ascophyllum nodosum seaweeds. J. Food Sci. 2022,87, 2405–2416. [CrossRef] 11. Xu, L.; Li, Y.; Dai, Y.; Peng, J. Natural products for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: Pharmacology and mechanisms. Pharmacol. Res. 2018,130, 451–465. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 12. Lund, M.N. Reactions of plant polyphenols in foods: Impact of molecular structure. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021 ,121, 241–251. [CrossRef] 13. Zhang, D.; Wang, C.; Shen, L.; Shin, H.C.; Lee, K.B.; Jif, B. Comparative analysis of oxidative mechanisms of phloroglucinol and dieckol by electrochemical, spectroscopic, cellular and computational methods. RSC Adv. 2018 ,8, 1963–1972. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 14. Gisbert, M.; Barcala, M.; Rosell, C.M.; Sineiro, J.; Moreira, R. Aqueous extracts characteristics obtained by ultrasound–assisted extraction from Ascophyllum nodosum seaweeds: Effect of operation conditions. J. Appl. Phycol. 2021,33, 3297–3308. [CrossRef] 15. Obluchinskaya, E.D.; Pozharitskaya, O.N.; Zakharova, L.V.; Daurtseva, A.V.; Flisyuk, E.V.; Shikov, A.N. Efficacy of natural deep eutectic solvents for extraction of hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds from Fucus vesiculosus.Molecules 2021 ,26, 4198. [CrossRef] 16. Zhu, Z.; Wu, Q.; Di, X.; Li, S.; Barba, F.J.; Koubaa, M.; Roohinejad, S.; Xiong, X.; He, J. Multistage recovery process of seaweed pigments: Investigation of ultrasound–assisted extraction and ultra–filtration performances. Food Bioprod. Process 2017 ,104, 40–47. [CrossRef] 17. Kadam, S.U.; O’Donnell, C.P.; Rai, D.K.; Hossain, M.B.; Burgess, C.M.; Walsh, D.; Tiwari, B.K. Laminarin from Irish brown seaweeds Ascophyllum nodosum and Laminaria hyperborea: Ultrasound assisted extraction, characterisation, and bioactivity. Mar. Drugs 2015,13, 4270–4280. [CrossRef] 18. Catarino, M.D.; Silva, A.; Mateus, N.; Cardoso, S.M. Optimization of phlorotannins extraction from Fucus vesiculosus and evaluation of their potential to prevent metabolic disorders, Mar.Drugs 2019,17, 162. [CrossRef] 19. Wang, J.; Hu, S.; Nie, S.; Yu, Q.; Xie, M. Reviews on mechanisms of in vitro antioxidant activity of polysaccharides. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 5692852. [CrossRef] 20. Allwood, J.W.; Evans, H.; Austin, C.; McDougall, G.J. Extraction, enrichment, and LC–MSn–based characterization of phlorotannins and related phenolics from the brown seaweed, Ascophyllum nodosum.Mar. Drugs 2020,18, 448. [CrossRef] 21. Tierney, M.S.; Soler–Vila, A.; Rai, D.K.; Croft, A.K.; Brunton, N.P.; Smyth, T.J. UPLC–MS profiling of low molecular weight phlorotannin polymers in Ascophyllum nodosum,Pelvetia canaliculata and Fucus spiralis.Metabolomics 2014 ,10, 524–535. [CrossRef] 22. Wang, T.; Jonsdottir, R.; Olafsdottir, G. Total phenolic compounds, radical scavenging and metal chelation of extracts from Icelandic seaweeds. Food Chem. 2009,116, 240–248. [CrossRef] 23. Zhang, J.; Tiller, C.; Shen, J.; Wang, C.; Girouard, G.S.; Dennis, D.; Barrow, C.J.; Miao, M.; Stewart, H.S. Antidiabetic properties pf polysaccharide– polyphenolic– enriched fractions from the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum.Can. J. Physiol. Pharm. 2007 ,85, 1116–1127. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 24. Ummat, V.; Tiwari, B.K.; Jaiswal, A.K.; Condon, K.; Garcia–Vaquero, M.; O’Doherty, J.; O’Donnell, C.; Rajauria, G. Optimization of ultrasound frequency, extraction time and solvent for the recovery of polyphenols, phlorotannins and associated antioxidant activity of brown seaweeds. Mar. Drugs 2020,18, 250. [CrossRef] Mar. Drugs 2022,20, 706 18 of 18 25. Hermund, D.B.; Plaza, M.; Turner, C.; Jónsdóttir, R.; Kristinsson, H.G.; Jacobsen, C.; Nielsen, K.F. Structure dependent antioxidant capacity of phlorotannins from Icelandic Fucus vesiculosus by UHPLC-DAD-ECD-QTOFMS. Food Chem. 2018 ,240, 904–909. [CrossRef] 26. Montes, L.; Gisbert, M.; Hinojosa, I.; Sineiro, J.; Moreira, R. Impact of drying on the sodium alginate obtained after polyphenols ultrasound–assisted extraction from Ascophyllum nodosum seaweeds. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021,272, 118455. [CrossRef] 27. Audibert, L.; Fauchon, M.; Blanc, N.; Hauchard, D.; Ar Gall, E. Phenolic compounds in the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum: Distribution and radical–scavenging activities. Phytochem. Anal. 2010,21, 399–405. [CrossRef] 28. Connan, S.; Goulard, F.; Stiger, V.; Deslandes, E.; Ar Gall, E. Interspecific and temporal variation in phlorotannin levels in an assemblage of brown algae. Bot. Mar. 2004,47, 410–416. [CrossRef] 29. Kubanek, J.; Lester, S.E.; Fenical, W.; Hay, M.E. Ambiguous role of phlorotannins as chemical defenses in the brown alga Fucus vesiculosus.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2004,277, 79–93. [CrossRef] 30. Paiva, L.; Lima, E.; Neto, A.I.; Baptista, J. Angiotensin I–Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitory activity, antioxidant properties, phenolic content and amino acid profiles of Fucus spiralis L. protein hydrolysate fractions. Mar. Drugs 2017,15, 311. [CrossRef] 31. Bogolitsyn, K.; Dobrodeeva, L.; Druzhinina, A.; Ovchinnikov, D.; Parshina, A.; Shulgina, E. Biological activity of a phenolic complex of Artic brown algae. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019,32, 4277–4287. [CrossRef] 32. Ertani, A.; Francioso, O.; Tinti, A.; Schiavon, M.; Pizzeghello, D.; Nardi, S. Evaluation of seaweed extracts from Laminaria and Ascophyllum nodosum spp. as biostimulants in Zea mays L. using a combination of chemical, biochemical and morphological approaches. Front. Plant Sci. 2018,9, 428. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 33. Hesse, M.; Meier, H.; Zeeh, B. Infrared spectroscopie and Raman. In Spektroskopische Methoden in der Organischen, 7th ed.; Thieme Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany, 2005; pp. 50–82. 34. Vissers, A.M.; Caligiani, A.; Sforza, S.; Vincken, J.P.; Gruppen, H. Phlorotannin composition of Laminaria digitata.Phytochem. Anal. 2017,28, 487–495. [CrossRef] 35. Zhang, Q.; Li, N.; Liu, X.; Zhao, Z.; Li, Z.; Xu, Z. The structure of a sulfated galactan from Porphyra haitanensis and its in vivo antioxidant activity. Carbohydr. Res. 2004,339, 105–111. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 36. Sardari, R.R.R.; Prothman, J.; Gregersen, O.; Turner, C.; Karlsson, E.N. Identification of phlorotannins in the brown algae, Saccharina latissima and Ascophyllum nodosum by ultra–high–performance liquid chromatography coupled to high–resolution tandem mass spectrometry. Molecules 2021,26, 43. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 37. Lopes, G.; Barbosa, M.; Vallejo, F.; Gil–Izquierdo, Á.; Andrade, P.B.; Valentão, P.; Pereira, D.M.; Ferreres, F. Profiling phlorotannins from Fucus spp. of the Northern Portuguese coastline: Chemical approach by HPLC–DAD–ESI/MSn and UPLC–ESI–QTOF/MS. Algal Res. 2018,29, 113–120. [CrossRef] 38. Heffernan, N.; Brunton, N.P.; FitzGerald, R.J.; Smyth, T.J. Profiling of the molecular weight and structural isomer abundance of macroalgae–derived phlorotannins. Mar. Drugs 2015,13, 509–528. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 39. Corona, G.; Ji, Y.; Anegboonlap, P.; Hotchkiss, S.; Gill, C.; Yaqoob, P.; Spencer, J.P.E.; Rowland, I. Gastrointestinal modifications and bioavailability of brown seaweed phlorotannins and effects on inflammatory markers. Br. J. Nutr. 2016 ,115, 1240–1253. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 40. Nwosu, F.; Morris, J.; Lund, V.A.; Stewart, D.; Ross, H.A.; McDougall, G.J. Anti–proliferative and potential anti–diabetic effects of phenolic–rich extracts from edible marine algae. Food Chem. 2011,126, 1006–1012. [CrossRef] 41. Gonçalves-Fernández, C.; Sineiro, J.; Moreira, R.; Gualillo, O. Extraction and characterization of phlorotannin-enriched fractions from the Atlantic seaweed Bifurcaria bifurcata and evaluation of their cytotoxic activity in murine cell line. J. App. Phycol. 2019 ,31, 2573–2583. [CrossRef]