Existence and Uniqueness of Positive Solution for Singular BVPs on Time Scales
Abstract
This paper is devoted to derive some sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of positive solutions to a singular second-order dynamic equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions.
Full text
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in Difference Equations Volume 2009, Article ID 728484, 12 pages doi:10.1155/2009/728484 Research Article Existence and Uniqueness of Positive Solution for Singular BVPs on Time Scales Ana G ´ omez Gonz´ alez1and Victoria Otero-Espinar2 1Departamento de Matem´ atica Aplicada, Facultade de Matem´ aticas, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Galicia, Spain 2Departamento de An´ alise Matem´ atica, Facultade de Matem´ aticas, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Galicia, Spain Correspondence should be addressed to Victoria Otero-Espinar, [email protected] Received 27 March 2009; Accepted 12 May 2009 Recommended by Alberto Cabada This paper is devoted to derive some sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of positive solutions to a singular second-order dynamic equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions. Copyright q2009 A. G´ omez Gonz´ alez and V. Otero-Espinar. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 1. Introduction Hilger 1introduced the notion of time scale in 1990 in order to unify the theory of continuous and discrete calculus. The field of dynamic equations on time scale contains, links, and extends the classical theory of differential and difference equations, besides many others. There are more time scales than just Rcorresponding to the continuous caseand Ndiscrete caseand hence many more classes of dynamic equations. By time scale we mean a closed subset of the real numbers. Let Tbe an arbitrary time scale. We assume that Thas the topology that it inherits from the standard topology on R. Assume that a<bare points in Tand define the time scale interval a, bT{t∈T:a≤t≤ b}. For t∈T, define the forward jump operator σ:T→Tby σtinf{s∈T:s>t}and the backward jump operator ρ:T→Tby ρtsup{s∈T:s<t}. In this definition we put σttif Tattains a maximum tand ρttif Tattains a minimum t.Ifσt>t,tis said to be right-scattered and if σtt, t is said to be right-dense. If ρt<t,tis said to be left-scattered and if ρtt, t is said to be left-dense. A function f:T→Ris said to be rd-continuous provided it is continuous at all rightdense points of T, and its left-sided limit exists at left-dense points of T. For t∈T,thedelta
2 Advances in Difference Equations derivative fΔtof fat tis defined to be the number if existssuch that for given >0, there exists a neighborhood Uof tsuch that fσt−fs−fΔtσt−s≤|σt−s|,∀s∈U. 1.1 See 2for general theory about time scales. The problem we will consider in this work is of the type −uΔΔ gt, uσt, uauσ2b0. 1.2 Under this general form it included the Emden-Fowler equation, which arises in several fields, such as the following: iAstrophysics: related to the stellar structure gaseous dynamics. In this case the fundamental problem is to investigate the equilibrium configuration of the mass of spherical clouds of gas. iiGas dynamics and fluid mechanics. The solutions of physical interest in this context are bounded nonoscillatory and possess a positive zero. iiiRelativistic mechanics. ivNuclear physics. vChemically reacting systems: in the theory of diffusion and reaction this equation appears as governing the concentration uof a substance which disappears by an isothermal reaction at each point of a slab of catalyst. We refer to Wong 3, for a general historical overview about this equation. Many works on this equation have been written in the continuous case, and we can cite among others, 4,5or 6. On the discrete case we find the book 7which studies the oscillation properties of the solutions of different difference equations. For the specific problem uΔΔtptuγσt 0, where p≥0andγquotient of odd positive numbers, also oscillation properties were studied in 8. On time scales some results on existence and uniqueness of solutions in the sense of distribution for this equation can be found in the article 9. Considering classical solutions, oscillation properties have also been studied, in works such as 10with delayor 11. In the present paper we present some results on time scales considering classical solutions which generalize the ones from the continuous case. 2. Lower and Upper Solutions Method Let a, b ∈T, such that a<ρb. Let us put Ja, σ2bT,J κa, σbT,andJκo a, σbTif a/ σaand Ja, σ2bT,J κa, σbT,andJκoa, σbTif aσa.
Advances in Difference Equations 3 We consider the second-order dynamic equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions, −uΔΔtft, uσt,t∈Jκo, uaA, uσ2bB, P where f:Jκo×A → R,A⊂R, satisfies the following condition. H1iFor every x∈A,f·,x∈CrdJκo, iift, ·is continuous on Auniformly in t∈Jκo. For convenience, we denote Eh∈CrdJκo,R:σb a σs−aσ2b−shsΔs<∞.2.1 We say that fsatisfies the condition H2on B⊂Jκo×Aif there exists a function h∈E such that H2 ft, x≤ht,∀t, x∈B.2.2 Definition 2.1. A solution of Pis a function u∈C2 rda, bTsuch that ut∈A, for all t∈a, σ2bT, which satisfies the equalities on Pfor each t∈Jκo, where C2 rda, bTy∈Ca, σ2bT,y ΔΔ :Jκo−→ R,y ΔΔ ∈Crda, bT.2.3 Definition 2.2. We say that α∈C2 rda, bTis a lower solution of Pif αt∈A, for all t∈a, σ2bTand −αΔΔt≤ft, ασt,t∈Jκo, αa≤A, ασ2b≤B. 2.4 An upper solution β∈C2 rda, bTof Pis defined similarly by reversing the previous inequalities. We have the following result. Theorem 2.3. Let αand βbe, respectively, a lower and upper solution for problem P, such that α≤βon a, σ2bT.Iffsatisfies H1and the conditions H2on Dβ αt, x∈Jκo×R:ασt≤x≤βσt,2.5 then problem Phas at least one solution usuch that α≤u≤βon a, σ2bT.
4 Advances in Difference Equations Proof. We consider the following modified problem: −uΔΔtf∗t, uσt,t∈Jκo, uaA, uσ2bB. Pm with f∗t, x ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ft, ασt ασt−x 1ασt−x,if x≤ασt, ft, x,if ασt≤x≤βσt, ft, βσtx−βσt 1x−βσt,if βσt≤x. 2.6 Due to the hypothesis it can be easily checked that H1and H2are satisfied by the function f∗. Note that, if uis a solution of Pmsuch that α≤u≤βon a, σ2bT, then uis a solution of P, also satisfying α≤u≤βon a, σ2bT. To show that any solution uof Pmis between αand β,letvtαt−ut,and suppose that there exists t∗∈a, σ2bTsuch that vt∗>0. As va≤0andvσ2b ≤0, then there exists t0∈a, σ2bTwith vt0maxvt,t∈a, σ2bT>0,2.7 and vt<vt0for t∈t0,σ2bT. The point t0is not simultaneously left-dense and right-scattered see 12, Theorem 2.1 this implies that σ◦ρt0t0, and we have that vΔΔρt0 ≤0see 12,so −vΔΔρt0uΔΔt0−αΔΔt0 ≤−f∗ρt0,u σρt0fρt0,α σρt0 −αt0−ut0 1αt0−ut0 <0. 2.8 So vΔΔρt0 >0, that is a contradiction. And so we have proved that vt≤0,∀t∈ a, σ2bT. Analogously it can be proved that ut≤βt,∀t∈a, σ2bT. We only need to prove that problem Pmhas at least one solution. Consider now the operator N:Ca, σ2bT→Ca, σ2bT, defined by Nutφtσb a Gt, sf∗s, uσsΔs, 2.9
Advances in Difference Equations 5 for each t∈a, σ2bT, where see 2 Gt, s1 σ2b−a⎧ ⎨ ⎩ t−aσ2b−σs,t≤s, σs−aσ2b−t,σ s≤t 2.10 is Green’s function of the problem −xΔΔ 0, xaxσ2b0, 2.11 and for t∈a, σ2bT φtAB−A σ2b−at−a2.12 is the solution of −xΔΔ 0 such that φaAand φσ2b B. Clearly, Gt, s>0ona, σ2bT×a, σ2bT,Gt, ·is rd-continuous on a, σbT and G·,sis continuous on a, σ2bT. The function Nu defined by 2.9belongs to Ca, σ2bTbecause f∗checks the conditions H1and H2on Jκo×Rand Gt, s≤s1−s, for each t, s ∈a, σ2bT. It is obvious that u∈Ca, σ2bTis a solution of Pmif and only if uNu.Sothe problem now is ensuring the existence of fixed-points of N. First of all, Nis well defined, is continuous, and NCa, σ2bT is a bounded set. The existence of a fixed-point of Nfollows from the Schauder fixed-point theorem, once we have checked that NCa, σ2bT is relatively compact, that using the Ascoli-Arzela theorem is equivalent to proving that NCa, σ2bT is an equicontinuous family. Let h∗∈Ebe the function related to f∗by condition H2. We compute the first derivative of Nu using 2, Theorem 1.117 NuΔt1 σ2b−aB−A−t a σs−af∗s, uσsΔs σb tσ2b−σsf∗s, uσsΔs ≤1 σ2b−a|B−A|t a σs−ah∗sΔsσb tσ2b−σsh∗sΔs :1 σ2b−a|B−A|λt. 2.13
6 Advances in Difference Equations Finally it is enough to check that λ∈L1Jκo, using integration by parts we obtain σb a |λs|Δsσb a λsΔs lim r→σb−r at a σs−ah∗sΔsΔt lim r→aσb rσb tσ2b−σsh∗sΔsΔt 2σb a σs−aσ2b−σsh∗sΔs −lim r→σb−σ2b−rr a σs−ah∗sΔs −lim r→ar−aσb rσ2b−σsh∗sΔs<∞, 2.14 due to h∗∈E, and the fact σ2b−rr a σs−ah∗sΔs≤σb a σs−aσ2b−σsh∗sΔs, r−aσb rσ2b−σsh∗sΔs≤σb a σs−aσ2b−σsh∗sΔs. 2.15 And so the result is proved. 3. Existence and Uniqueness of Positive Solution Let g:Jκo×0,∞→Rin the condition H1, where A0,∞, and consider the problem −uΔΔtgt, uσt,t∈Jκo, uauσ2b0. Q We will deduce the existence of solution to Qby supposing that the following hypothesis holds. H3There exists a constant L>0 such that for any compact set D⊂Jκo, there is εεD>0: gt, x>L, ∀t, x∈D×0,ε.3.1
Advances in Difference Equations 7 Theorem 3.1. Suppose that H1and H3hold. If, for any δ>0,gsatisfies the condition H2on Jκo×δ, ∞, then problem Qhas at least one solution. Proof. Let’s consider {an}n≥1,{bn}n≥1⊂Jκoas two sequences such that {an}n≥1⊂ a, aσb/2Tis strictly decreasing to aif aσa,andanafor all n≥1ifa<σa,and {bn}n≥1⊂aσb/2,σbTis strictly increasing to σbif ρσb σb,b nρσb for all n≥1ifρσb <σb. We denote as Dn:an,b nT⊂Jκo,n≥1. Due to the first hypothesis, we can then ensure the existence of εn>0 such that gt, x>L, for all t, x∈Dn×0,ε n. We can suppose, without restriction that {εn}is a decreasing sequence and limn→∞εn0. Consider the function γ:a, a1T→R, such that γa0, and if a/ a1then γt ε2for t∈a2,a 1,γtεn, for all t∈Dn\Dn−1,withn≥3. Since γis nondecreasing, we obtain that for t∈a, a1 γ1t:1 σ2b−at a γsΔs≤γt3.2 is continuous and increasing. Repeating this argument twice, for i2,3 we define γit:1 σ2b−at a γi−1sΔs≤γt.3.3 So γ3∈C2a, a1Tis a convex function verifying γ3t≤εn,∀t∈Dn\Dn−1,n≥2. Analogously, we can consider γ:b1,σ2bT→R, such that γσ2b 0,γσb 0,γtε2, for all t∈b1,b 2and γtεn, for all t∈Dn\Dn−1,withn≥3. Taking γ0γ,we obtain, for i1,2,3, that for t∈b1,σ2b γit:1 σ2b−aσ2b tγi−1sΔs≤γt3.4 is continuous and decreasing, and γ3∈C2b1,σ2bTa convex function such that γ3t≤ εn,∀t∈Dn\Dn−1,n≥2. We now define αt⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ γ3t,t∈a, a1T, α∗t,t∈a1,b 1T, γ3t,t∈b1,σ2bT, 3.5 with α∗ta convenient function, so that α∈C2a, σ2bT,and0<αt≤ε1for all t∈ a1,b 1T. So α∈C2a, σ2bTis a function such that αaασ2b 0,αt>0fort∈ a, σbT,αt≤ε1for t∈D1,andαt≤εn,fort∈Dn\Dn−1,n≥2. In this way, we note that gt, x>L, ∀t, x∈Jκo×{x∈0,∞:0<x≤αt}.3.6
8 Advances in Difference Equations Let m0min{1,L/αΔΔ 1}. Let Ft, x≥gt, x, for all t, x∈Jκo×0,∞,withFin the conditions H1.We will prove that if v∈C2 rda, σ2bTis any solution of −vΔΔ Ft, vσt,3.7 with va≥0,vσ2b ≥0andvt>0 for all t∈Jκo, then, vt≥m0αt,∀t∈a, σ2bT.3.8 Suppose there exists t∈a, σ2bT, such that vt−m0αt<0. Then, we can assure, using arguments analogous to the ones in the proof of Theorem 2.3, that there exists t∗∈a, σ2bT verifying vΔΔρt∗≥m0αΔΔρt∗,3.9 which implies that L<F ρt∗,vσρt∗−vΔΔρt∗≤−m0αΔΔρt∗<m 0 αΔΔ 1≤L, 3.10 which is a contradiction. We define now, for each n∈N gnt, x:maxgτnt,x,gt, x,3.11 where, for each t∈Jκo τntmax{an,min{t, bn}}.3.12 For each nwe have that gnis a function verifying H1on Jκo×0,∞,andgnt, x≥gt, x, for all t, x∈J×0,∞and gnt, xgt, x,fort∈Dn. The sequence {gn}nconverges to guniformly in every set of the form D×0,∞, where D⊂Jκois a compact set. Defining, by induction, g1t, xg1t, xand for n>1 gn1t, xmingnt, x,gn1t, x,3.13 we have that, for each n, the function gnsatisfies the condition H1on Jκo×0,∞.As well g1≥g2≥···≥gn≥···≥g, and {gn}nconverges to guniformly, in every set of the form D×0,∞, where D⊂Jκois a compact set. It is also verified that gnt, xgt, x,t∈an,b n,x∈0,∞.
Advances in Difference Equations 9 Now we define the following problems: uΔΔtgnt, uσt 0,t∈Jκo, uauσ2bεn. Qn We will prove that for any c∈0,ε n, the constant function αn≡cis a strictlower solution for Qn. It is obvious that cαna≤εn,andcαnσ2b ≤εn. Now we have to prove that gnt, c>0,t∈Jκo,c∈0,ε n.3.14 For n1, let c∈0,ε 1such that g1t, cg1t, cmaxgτ1t,c,gt, c≥gτ1t,c>L. 3.15 Suppose now that gnt, c>0,t∈Jκo,c∈0,ε n,foragivenn≥1, and we will check that gn1t, c>0,t∈Jκo.Letc∈0,ε n1such that gn1t, cmingnt, c,gn1t, c≥mingnt, c,gτn1t,c>0.3.16 Thus the assertion is proved. Moreover, as gn≥gn1on Jκo×0,∞, it can be easily checked that any solution un of Qnis an upper solution for Qn1. To show that problem Q1has at least one solution. We fix a constant M≥ε1.From the assumption imposed, there exists a function hM∈CrdJκo,Rsuch that gt, x≤hMt,∀t∈Jκo,x≥M. 3.17 Note that gτ1t,x≤hMτ1t ≤R, ∀t∈Jκo,∀x≥M, 3.18 with R>0 is a suitable constant. Set qt:hMtR. We have that q∈CrdJκo,0,∞,and g1t, x≤qt,∀t∈J, x ≥M. 3.19 Let β∈C2 rda, bTbe a solution of the boundary value problem: uΔΔtqt0, uauσ2bM. 3.20