scieee Open visual document viewer

Burial shafts and chambers of Nefer and Neferhathor in tomb AS 68d. A comparative evaluation of the ceramic finds

Arias Kytnarová, Katarína

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to compare two sets of ceramic finds from the two southernmost shafts uncovered in tomb AS 68d, namely Shaft 1, belonging to the main tomb owner named Nefer, and Shaft 2, which very likely belonged to his wife, Neferhathor. These shafts are interesting due to the fact that although both their burial chambers were robbed and thus the shafts must have been disturbed, a large number of typologically and metrically similar vessels and their fragments were uncovered in the fills. In both shafts, we were able to uncover a large amount of fragments belonging not only to certain ceramic classes (especially stands, platters and jars) but also to the same groups, such as the tall hour-glass stands or the low ring stands. Also, numerous examples from both shafts were able to be glued together to at least full profile, if not to full diameter. Thus it is possible to assume that these shafts were back-filled with either their original contents or at least an unknown fraction of it, and the ceramic finds uncovered in them were originally part of intentional burial shaft deposits.

Full text

PRAGUE E GYPTOLOGICAL STUDIES Con en s REPORTS Bu ial sha s and chambe s o Ne e and Ne e ha ho in omb AS 68d. A compa a i e e alua ion o he ce amic fi nds (Ka a ína A ias Ky na o á) . . . . . . . . .3 Tomb o he chie physician Shepseska ankh (Mi osla Bá a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 A chaeological exca a ion o he mas aba o Queen Khen kaus III ( omb AC 30) in Abusi (Ja omí K ejčí – Ka a ína A ias Ky na o á – Ma in Odle ) . . . . . . . . . . .28 Explo a ion o he bu ial apa men s in omb complex AS 68. P elimina y epo o he 2013 all season (Hana Vymazalo á) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43 STUDIES Ri ual adi ion and ans e be ween shape and meaning – model bee ja s in s one and po e y (Ka a ína A ias Ky na o á – Lucie Ji ásko á) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59 A bu ial wi h a s amp seal depic ing a Bes-like fi gu e om Abusi (Ve onika Dulíko á – Ma in Odle – Helena Březino á – Pe a Ha elko á). . . . . . .69 Damage and epai o he Old Kingdom canopic ja s – he case a Abusi (Lucie Ji ásko á) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76 The mi aculous ise o he Fi h Dynas y – he s o y o Papy us Wes ca and his o ical e idence (Mi osla Ve ne ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .86 Dea eade s, I has been hi een yea s since he fi s issue o P ague Egyp ological S udies was published in 2002. Since hen i has become an impo an and wide-selling jou nal, p o iding bo h he scien ifi c and laymen audience wi h he la es esul s o ou fi eldwo k and a ious s udies in he fi eld o Czech Egyp ology dealing wi h he ci ilisa ions o ancien Egyp and Sudan. A e mo e han a decade o i s exis ence, we a e pleased o launch he fi s issue o he English edi ion o P ague Egyp ological S udies. The English edi ion is dedica ed exclusi ely o he his o y, a chaeology and language o hi d millennium BC Egyp . Ye i also aims o include s udies dealing wi h o eign ela ions du ing he pe iod. A he same ime, we also welcome publica ions on he la es ad ances in he s udy o he en i onmen and s udies e alua ing he signifi cance o applied sciences. Ou p incipal aim is o accommoda e s udies conce ning ei he p ima y esea ch in he fi eld o hose ha b ing up heo e ical inqui ies o essen ial impo ance o he indica ed scope and ime ame o he jou nal. The p esen issue is de o ed o he exca a ions a Abusi , he p incipal fi eld o esea ch o he Czech Ins i u e o Egyp ology. The indi idual epo s a e dedica ed o he exca a ion p ojec s ca ied ou in he py amid fi eld (Khen kaus III), as well as in he Abusi Sou h a ea ( omb complex AS 68, he omb o Shepseska ankh). In addi ion o hese, you will also fi nd mo e heo e ical s udies ocusing on he “Khen kaus p oblem”, which analyses he signifi cance and impo ance o h ee women bea ing he same name du ing he Fou h and Fi h Dynas ies, a s udy dealing wi h model bee ja s and hei ypological e olu ion, an in e es ing seal wi h a fi gu e o Bes, and an in e p e a ion o canopic ja s bea ing signifi can okens o pas ea men on hei bodies. We us ha he English edi ion o P ague Egyp ological S udies, which will be p oduced once a yea , will fi nd a fi m place among o he Egyp ological schola ly jou nals. We a e con inced ha a clea ly defi ned p ofi le o his scien ifi c jou nal will a ac no only he a en ion o many eade s bu also submissions o signifi can con ibu ions om he scien ifi c communi y and hus s eamline majo ad ances in he fi elds o hi d millennium BC Egyp his o y, a chaeology and he like. Mi osla Bá a and Lucie Ji ásko á PRAŽSKÉ EGYPTOLOGICKÉ STUDIE (P ague Egyp ological S udies) Edi o ial boa d P o . Mg . Mi osla Bá a, D . Ao. Uni .-P o . D . Pe e Jánosi P o . Pe e De Manuelian Junio p o . D . Joanne Rowland Mg . Rena a Landg á o á, Ph.D. D . Gab iele Pieke D . Teodozja Rzeuska Execu i e edi o s Mg . Ve onika Dulíko á Mg . Lucie Ji ásko á Mg . Ma ie Hloucho á Publishe Cha les Uni e si y in P ague, Facul y o A s, Czech Ins i u e o Egyp ology, Cele ná 20, 110 00 P aha 1, h p://egyp ologie. .cuni.cz The publica ion was p epa ed wi hin he P og amme o he De elopmen o Fields o S udy a Cha les Uni e si y, No. P14 “A chaeology o non-Eu opean Regions”, subp og amme “Resea ch o ancien Egyp ian ci iliza ion. Cul u al and poli ical adap a ion o he No h A ican ci ilisa ions in ancien his o y (5000 B.C. – 1000 A.D.)” Pho og aphs and illus a ions A chi e o he Czech Ins i u e o Egyp ology FA CU, Jiří Vaněk (Na ional museum) Language e iew An hony Pa ick A ias, B.A. Typog aphy PhD . Oleg Man Typese ing and p in SERIFA, s. . o., Jinonická 80, 150 00 P aha 5 ISSN 1214-3189 Copy igh Cha les Uni e si y in P ague Pho og aph on he on page A econs uc ion o he o e ing place in on o he alse doo o Ne e in omb AS 68d (pho o M. F ouz) XV/ 2015 CZECH INSTITUTE OF EGYPTOLOGY REPORTS PES XV/2015 3 The aim o his pape is o compa e wo se s o ce amic inds om he wo main sha s unco e ed in omb AS 68d, namely Sha 1 ( ha o he omb owne , Ne e ) and om Sha 2 ( e y likely belonging o his wi e, Ne e ha ho ). Bo h names a e a es ed on he alse doo o Ne e , si ua ed oughly wes o his sha (Bá a – Vymazalo á – Dulíko á e al. 2014: 29, Fig. 10). Bo h hei bu ial chambe s we e obbed and hus he sha s mus ha e been dis u bed, bu despi e his ac , la ge numbe s o ypologically and me ically simila essels and hei agmen s we e unco e ed in he ills o hese sha s. This pape shall concen a e on he impo ance and in e p e a ion o he spa ial dis ibu ion o hese ce amic inds, and hus he issues o da ing and he p o iding o pa allels shall be ouched upon only occasionally as hey a e no he main opic o his analysis. The sha and bu ial chambe o Ne e The sou he nmos sha (Sha 1) in omb AS 68d was exca a ed du ing he 2014 season. I belonged wi hou any doub o he main owne o he omb, he high o icial Ne e , Bu ial sha s and chambe s o Ne e and Ne e ha ho in omb AS 68d. A compa a i e e alua ion o he ce amic inds Ka a ína A ias Ky na o á In he cou se o he yea s 2012–2014 in he a ea o Abusi Sou h, he Czech Ins i u e o Egyp ology unco e ed a la ge complex o an un il hen unknown p incess o he Fi h Dynas y, She e neb y, possibly a daugh e o King Nyuse e (Vymazalo á – Dulíko á 2012 and 2014). The complex is e y la ge and consis s o an open pilla ed cou ya d and ou ock-cu ombs (AS 68a – AS 68d) ha a e si ua ed sou h and sou heas o i (see plan 1 in Vymazalo á in his issue). Du ing he cou se o he explo a ion, ex ensi e une a y ac i i y was a es ed, no only in he ombs bu also in he open cou ya d and he adjoining co ido be ween he ock-cu ombs and he omb o Ne e shepes/Memi (AS 67). In he whole complex, 29 sha s we e buil du ing he span o he la e Fi h o he e minal Six h Dynas y. The complex is unique in se e al ea u es, one o hem also being he quan i y, quali y and ele ance o he ce amic inds, a la ge amoun o which we e ound in p ima y con ex s such as he bu ial chambe s o deposi s in he sha s. In o he cases, e en he mixed con ex s had high spa ial dis ibu ion alue as hey a e he emains o he o iginal in en ional deposi s. Fig. 1 A en a i e econs uc ion o he use o s ands wi h pla e s du ing i uals, in on o he alse doo o Ne e (AS 68d). The ce amics we e all ound in agmen s in he sha o Ne e (pho o M. F ouz) as is a es ed by his alse doo unco e ed in si u oughly wes o he sha (see ig. 1). The ce amic inds om his sha we e e y ex ensi e and exceeded hose unco e ed in he neighbou ing Sha 2 o his wi e (see in a). The ill o he sha was no homogenous, and as a esul , he ce amic inds we e collec ed in se e al le els, each ha ing a di e en con ex numbe . The e we e al oge he six ce amic con ex s in he sha . The la ges amoun o po e y, a leas 83 indi idual essels, came om he op laye o he sha , om a dep h down o 1.00 m, and included e y la ge agmen s o s ands (77.AS68d.2014). The mos dis inc i e con ex (78.AS68d.2014) came om a dep h o 3.00 m, whe e nume ous ce amic agmen s we e ound in a clus e in he sou heas e n co ne o he sha , oge he wi h animal bones (374/AS68d/2014). Ye ano he concen a ion o po e y was unea hed a a dep h o 3.00 m (80.AS68d.2014) in he sou hwes e n co ne o he sha , also accompanied by animal bones (375/AS68d/2014). Con ex 79.AS68d.2014 illed he a ea a ound and unde nea h his con ex , o a dep h o 3.50 m. Ca e ul documen a ion o he ce amic inds was necessa y, as du ing he ollowing econs uc ion o he inds, agmen s om di e en le els o he sha we e ound o complemen each o he , hus p o ing he dis u bed na u e o he sha . To gi e an explici example, a la ge a wi h a spou was unco e ed in h ee di e en con ex s; some body she ds came om con ex 77, one hal o he spou and la ge pa o he body was ound in con ex 78 and he o he hal plus mos o he body she ds om con ex 79. I a essel was ound in pieces in di e en con ex s, he inal essel numbe was alloca ed acco ding o he one wi h la ges amoun o sizeable pieces, in his case con ex 79. Finally, he e was a base o a bee ja (82.AS68d.2014) ound a he bo om o Sha 1, in on o he pa ly dis u bed mud b ick wall leading in o he bu ial chambe . Howe e , his bee ja should no be seen as any emnan o o e ings o omb goods bu a he as e use om seconda y i ual ac i i ies connec ed o he bu ial – i was ound wi h a hick laye o mo a (o a simila ough whi e subs ance) inside and he e o e mos likely se ed as a con aine o mo a designa ed o sealing he sa cophagus o whi ening he closing wall. While i was e iden ly used du ing he sealing i uals, i s p esence a he bo om o he sha may be in en ional only in he sense ha such a ja could no be la e eused o any o he pu pose due o eligious belie s and hus had o be abandoned he e. Vessels illed wi h mo a o a di e en whi e subs ance (such as ine plas e ) a e commonly ound a he bo om o bu ial sha s, mos no ably in Giza, Nazle Ba an, Saqqa a and Meidum.1They a e no o be con used wi h he eligious meaning and unc ion o ully in ac bee ja s o en unco e ed in si u on he bo om o sha s wi h alse Nile mud illing inside, such as a ja om Sha 5 in he omb o p ies Ne e inpu (Bá a e al. 2014: Figs. 3.56, 3.57) and in he ombs o he Lake o Abusi ceme e y (ye unpublished). Some o hese la e bee ja s we e addi ionally also sealed wi h a s oppe and undoub edly se ed as an o e ing du ing he closing i uals.2 The ce amic inds om he sha bo e se e al in e es ing cha ac e is ics, such as a la ge pe cen age o ce ain classes. Among hese, he classes o s ands and pla e s 4PES XV/2015 BURIAL SHAFTS AND CHAMBERS OF NEFER AND NEFERHATHOR Fig. 2 Almos ully econs uc ed pla e unco e ed in agmen s in a clus e o po e y and animal bones a a dep h o 3.00 m in he sha o Ne e (pho o K. A ias Ky na o á) we e by a he mos dominan . Also, a la ge numbe o hese s ands and pla e s we e able o be econs uc ed o ull p o ile, wi h mo e han 70 % o hei im and base diame e s p ese ed. All his could poin o he ac ha he ill o he sha , al hough dis u bed, was no composed o some acciden al e use bu a he ha la ge pa s o he o iginal ill o he sha we e s ill in place. The agmen s om which hese essels we e econs uc ed measu ed om la ge (especially sha s o s ands) o e y small ( im and base she ds) and all o hem had sha p, une oded edges wi hou any aces o being exposed o sun, wind o o he elemen s. Some pla e s we e able o be glued almos ully om mo e han 10 indi idual agmen s (e.g. see ig. 2). The o he classes unco e ed in he sha s included some b ead moulds and bee ja s. The wo ce amic con ex s (78.AS68d.2014 and 80.AS68d.2014) ha we e collec ed a ound he animal bones, a a dep h o 3.00 m in he sou heas e n and sou hwes e n co ne o he sha , con ained only a small numbe o indi idual essels, bu some o hese we e able o be econs uc ed almos ully, such as pla e 78-4.AS68d.2014 ( ig. 2) and s and 80-1.AS68d.2014 (see ig. 4). The animal bones ha e no ye unde gone an analysis; i is he e o e impossible o s a e whe he he bones we e pa o a single animal o wo di e en ones. Howe e , i is impo an o s ess ha he ce amic agmen s om hese wo con ex s complemen ed each o he well, especially in he case o pla e s. The whole assemblage is mos cha ac e is ic o i s high numbe o s ands, ha ing a high p edominance o e all he o he ce amic classes. These s ands a e no all iden ical and hey belong o h ee main g oups; namely all hou -glass shaped s ands, lowe biconical s ands and inally low ing BURIAL SHAFTS AND CHAMBERS OF NEFER AND NEFERHATHOR PES XV/2015 5 Fig. 3 Selec ed ce amic essels om he ill o Sha 1 (d awing K. A ias Ky na o á, L. Vařeko á) s ands. Fo each g oup, he specimens a e e y simila in quali y, sizes and su ace ea men . The all hou -glass shaped s ands (Abusi ype S-1a) ha e ei he a simple o a olled im ( ig. 3). The examples wi h a simple im (S-1aI) a e sligh ly smalle , wi h ape u e diame e s be ween 12.50 and 13.00 cm, base diame e s o 10.50–12.50 cm and e y cons an heigh s o 23.00–23.50 cm ( ig. 3, second ow and ig. 4).3Those wi h olled o modelled im (S-1aII) a e isibly la ge , wi h ape u e diame e s o 13.00–15.00 cm, base diame e s o 12.00–14.00 cm and heigh s o 27.50–29.00 cm ( ig. 3, i s ow and ig. 5 ).4The e we e also wo medium- sized biconical s ands, wi h heigh s o only 15.50–16.00 cm. Finally, he small ing s ands o Abusi g oup S-6 we e also cons an in hei sizes, wi h ape u e and base diame e s o 10.00–12.00 cm and heigh s be ween 11.00 and 14.50 cm (see ig. 3, hi d ow).5F om his enume a ion i should be clea ha his was no andom e use bu a he he emnan s o a single deposi o a speci ic se and ha he o iginal numbe o s ands in his sha mus ha e been e y high. The di e en g oups o s ands se ed a di e se pu pose; om iconog aphic ep esen a ions i is clea ha while low ing s ands we e used as s ands o all ja s and especially bee ja s, he all biconical s ands we e a he used o bowls o pla e s, c ea ing hus he o m o a able (see also ig. 1). 6PES XV/2015 BURIAL SHAFTS AND CHAMBERS OF NEFER AND NEFERHATHOR Fig. 4 Example o a all hou -glass shaped s and wi h a simple im and base (Abusi ype S-1aI) om he sha o Ne e (pho o M. F ouz) Fig. 5 One o he all hou -glass shaped s ands wi h a olled im and base (Abusi ype S-1aII) om he sha o Ne e . The le -o e clay on he base is clea ly isible (pho o M. F ouz) Fig. 6 De ail o he inne walls o a all hou -glass shaped s and, wi h a hin laye o le -o e clay isible (pho o K. A ias Ky na o á) As a ule, all hese s ands we e made o medium ine Nile sil B1 ab ic. The all hou -glass shaped s ands we e buil up om coils and inished on a wheel in wo di e en pa s ha we e joined in he middle, esul ing in a e y ough inne middle su ace which is cha ac e is ic o his g oup. All he low ing s ands we e made on a wheel, also om coils. A p edominan numbe o hese s ands we e le uncoa ed and we e only we -smoo hed, lea ing ho izon al o diagonal smoo hing ma ks on he ou e body. An in e es ing echnological de ail is he li le a en ion ha was gi en o he bases o hese s ands – in almos all cases, while he ims o he s ands we e ca e ully smoo hed, he bases a e o en le ough, wi h supe luous clay emaining on he inne and some imes e en he ou e walls o he base ( ig. 6 and see also ig. 5). In all cases om his sha , i was he e o e possible o iden i y whe he a diagnos ic she d o a s and belonged wi hou any doub o a im o a base. Besides he s ands, he pla e s we e he mos common ce amic class. In he whole a ea o he sha , we unco e ed nume ous agmen s belonging o a leas 25 di e en pla e s. Some o hem we e able o be pains akingly econs uc ed o ull shape.6Mos o hese pla e s belong o so called Abusi g oup P-3, wi h ei he a ine o deepe g oo e unde he inne im ( ig. 7). Addi ionally, mos o hese pla e s sha e simila ea u es; as a ule, hey we e made o oughe ab ic, such as mos commonly Nile sil B2. Despi e his ac , almos all o hem we e co e ed wi h a hin laye o ed slip on hei uppe (inne ) su aces and some imes also on he ou e im. While hei inne su aces a e oughly smoo hed, hei bo oms we e only pounded and le u he un ea ed. The class o ja s was su p isingly unde ep esen ed. Conce ning bee ja s, he e we e nume ous ims, body BURIAL SHAFTS AND CHAMBERS OF NEFER AND NEFERHATHOR PES XV/2015 7 Fig. 7 One o he ed-slipped pla e s o g oup P-3 (wi h a g oo e unde he inne im) unco e ed in he sha o Ne e (pho o K. A ias Ky na o á) Fig. 8 A bee ja om Sha 1, econs uc ed o ull p o ile om agmen s. I was pa ly co e ed wi h a hin laye o Nile mud on he ou e shoulde s (d awing K. A ias Ky na o á, L. Vařeko á) she ds and base agmen s, bu only one example could be econs uc ed o ull p o ile, p o iding us hus wi h some me ic da a. This bee ja (77-6.AS68d.2014) was unco e ed in agmen s in he opmos laye o he sha . I belongs o Abusi ype J-1b wi h a low s aigh neck, o oid body and poin ed base ( ig. 8). The bee ja was 33.00 cm all, wi h an ape u e diame e o 8.50 cm and a maximum diame e o 17.00 cm. These dimensions a e in acco dance wi h he ime pe iod be ween he i s and he second s age o he nea by omb o Ne e inpu, hus e y likely he eign o King Nyuse e (see cha 1 in K ejčí – A ias Ky na o á – Odle in his issue). This pa icula bee ja is an exempla y case o obse ing some echnological de ails conce ning he making o hese ja s. They we e commonly buil by hand om h ee sepa a e pa s – he base, he main body and inally he neck. In his case, he neck i sel was inished on a u ning de ice. On he lowe body, he poin a which he body and base we e connec ed is clea ly isible bo h om inside and ou side. The main body o he ja was smoo hed; on he inne walls, he e a e isible aces o e ical smoo hing in wo le els. The ou e shoulde s and lowe body we e smoo hed wi h diagonal s okes. Addi ionally, he uppe shoulde s we e co e ed wi h a hin laye o mud. Such a su ace ea men is no unusual; i is clea ly isible on ea ly Old Kingdom bee ja s, such as hose om anonymous omb AS 54 (see ig. 7 in A ias Ky na o á – Ji ásko á in his issue). The pu pose is unclea – in he case o he ja s om AS 54, hei ou e walls we e en i ely co e ed in a compac laye o mud, and his could ha e se ed ei he as addi ional wa e -p oo ing o as he mal insula ion. As a as ja 77-6.AS68d.2014 is conce ned, only an a emp a he mal insula ion can be seen, as he laye he e is e y hin and only andomly dis ibu ed o e he shoulde s, seeming mo e symbolic han unc ional. The e we e nume ous no able ce amic inds om he ill o Sha 1 bu no all can be discussed in his pape . One in e es ing ind ha shall be men ioned is ce amic ool 79-1.AS68d.2014, which was ound in agmen s in he middle a ea o he sha , unde nea h and a ound he clus e wi h animal bones. I is an example o a ool made om a ce amic she d, e y likely o iginally belonging o a ine unslipped ja . I has an ellipsoid shape, and due o i s smoo h uppe and lowe su ace and clea ly wo n edges, i has o be assumed ha i se ed as a sc ape o smoo he ( ig. 9). Such ools a e gaining mo e in e es , and in Abusi , se e al pieces ha e been unco e ed o da e.7 The closes pa allels a e hose ha come om he omb o P ince We kau e in Cen al Abusi (A ias Ky na o á 2014b: Fig. 4.103:T and Fig. 4.104). The p esence o ce amic ools in a sha is unusual; howe e , i mus be s essed ha s one ools such as lin kni es ha e been ound bo h in i ual and bu ial sha s (see e.g. Rzeuska 2006: 451, 496, Table 4, Table 7; A ias Ky na o á 2014b: 86). While hese lin kni es undoub edly se ed a e y di e en unc ion, e y likely connec ed di ec ly o he cu ing o he animal pieces ha a e ound as o e ings in hese sha s, i is possible ha ce amic ools could also ha e had some so a unknown cul ic pu pose. I is, howe e , mo e likely ha hey we e pa o seconda y echnical po e y (used as a smoo hing o sc aping ool) ha was le behind only acciden ally. I is o no li le in e es ha a leas wo examples o ine ja s wi h isible aces o deep e ical smoo hing, which could ha e esul ed om he use o such a ool, we e unco e ed in he sha o Ne e . None o hese we e able o be econs uc ed o ull p o ile, bu wo we e spindle-shaped ja s wi h poin ed bases, while he las one is a la ge ja wi h a icula ed shoulde s, simila o he one almos ully p ese ed in he sha o Ne e ’s wi e (Bá a – Vymazalo á – Dulíko á e al. 2014: Fig. 13). Compa ed o he plen i ul po e y om he sha , he ce amic inds om he bu ial chambe o Ne e seem a he poo . Howe e , he bu ial chambe was disco e ed wi h a pa ially collapsed and uns able ceiling, and hus only pa o he o iginal omb goods we e able o be eco e ed du ing he isky cleaning wo ks. While he o iginal ex en o he i ems placed in his chambe is unclea , he e we e a leas wo di e en essels – one bee ja ound in agmen s (83-3.AS68d.2014 and 83-4.AS68d.2014) and a ca ina ed bowl, so called Meidum bowl, also b oken o pieces (83-1.AS68d.2014). As a as he bee ja is conce ned, i could no be econs uc ed o ull p o ile, bu due o he quali y o he she ds, i ing and colou s o he she ds and hei su ace ea men , i is clea ha hese agmen s belonged o a single essel, which had a sligh ly o al mou h wi h a diame e o 10.50 × 11.00 cm. Such dis igu a ion is no unusual and p obably occu ed ei he du ing he d ying (Rzeuska 2006: 385) o he i ing o he essels (Junke 1950: 16), when hey we e s acked on 8PES XV/2015 BURIAL SHAFTS AND CHAMBERS OF NEFER AND NEFERHATHOR Fig. 9 Comple e ce amic sc ape unco e ed in he middle pa o he sha (pho os K. A ias Ky na o á) each o he o placed oo igh ly in ows. In addi ion o he bee ja agmen s, he bu ial chambe also yielded an in ac mud s oppe om un i ed mud (83-2.AS68d.2014). As he bee ja im is incomple e and o al in shape, he associa ion o he mud s oppe wi h i is en a i e, bu hey could ha e belonged oge he . The mud s oppe has he shape o a unca ed cone (Abusi ype D-4), simila o hose ound in si u in he undis u bed bu ial chambe o p ies Ne e inpu in omb AS 37 (A ias Ky na o á 2014a: Figs. 7.8, 7.9), bu his one is o mo e compac ma e ial, wi hou isible aces o coiling and smoo hing on he ou e walls. The p esence o a sealed bee ja in a bu ial chambe is e y common, and he essels we e pa o he omb goods o he deceased, ep esen ing di e en i ems needed o he a e li e. In he case o a ious ja s, hese ep esen ed di e se luids, in his case na u ally he bee . I is no ewo hy ha in he abo e-men ioned in ac bu ial chambe o p ies Ne e inpu en such bee ja s we e unco e ed, p obably designed as an a e li e pe diem a ion o he p ies . The ca ina ed bowl unco e ed in agmen s eas o he sa cophagus, unde nea h he collapsed ceiling, was able o be econs uc ed o almos ull shape ( ig. 10). The bowl was o e y high quali y, being made o Nile sil A and co e ed ho oughly wi h a well-polished ed slip o hue 10R4/8. I had a all ecu ed im and angula shoulde s, wi h iden ical ape u e and shoulde diame e s (21.00 cm) and a medium deep body wi h a heigh o 7.50 cm. All i s ypological and me ic ea u es poin o he ac ha his bowl was manu ac u ed in he la e Fi h Dynas y (Op de Beeck 2004: 265, Table 3), wi h all ese a ions o he limi a ions o such a da ing.8Bowls such as hese we e commonly placed in he bu ial chambe s ep esen ing BURIAL SHAFTS AND CHAMBERS OF NEFER AND NEFERHATHOR PES XV/2015 9 Fig. 10 Almos ully p ese ed ca ina ed bowl unco e ed in she ds in he bu ial chambe o Ne e (pho o M. F ouz) mos likely he ood o he deceased. The e we e no o he agmen s belonging o a di e en bowl, so i is e y likely ha his was he only one. The ce amic inds o Ne e ha ho Sha 2 was e y likely c ea ed o he wi e o he main owne , Ne e ha ho , and a he ime o i s disco e y in he au umn o 2012, i was ound pa ly emp y o a dep h o abou 3.00 m. The iden i ica ion o he owne is based on he g ounds o he epig aphic e idence, wi h he name a es ed on he alse doo o he husband, Ne e (si ua ed immedia ely wes o Sha 1) and he ac ha she would be expec ed o ha e been bu ied in his nex , second sha o he omb. The an h opological analysis con i med ha a emale was bu ied in he sa cophagus o he bu ial chambe o Sha 2 and hus he associa ion o Ne e ha ho wi h he owne o his sha is ela i ely conclusi e. Ce amic inds we e unco e ed in se e al le els o he sha and i s bu ial chambe .9Unlike he abo e-men ioned sha , hese we e all assigned a single ce amic con ex numbe (44.AS68d.2012), only di e en ia ed by he le e s o he baske s and in he desc ip ion. Simila o Sha 1, he bu ial chambe o Sha 2 was also obbed and, he e o e, a leas pa o his sha mus ha e been emp ied. Howe e , clus e s o po e y in ce ain co ne s o he sha poin o he ac ha i was p obably no emp ied ully. The ill was a he compac , consis ing o b own sand mixed wi h a l, limes one chips and agmen s. The mos ele an con ex was a clus e o la ge ce amic agmen s in he sou heas e n co ne o he sha a a dep h o 2.70–3.50 m, consis ing e y likely o he emains o he o iginal sha deposi . I s con en s we e comp ised p edominan ly o s ands, pla e s and ine po e y. Roughly unde nea h his deposi was a sca e o animal bones (186/AS68d/2012), ound along he eas e n, wes e n and no he n side o he sha , as well as agmen s o wood (185/AS68d/2012). Smalle amoun s o disa icula ed po e y om Sha 2 came om below he clus e , om a dep h o 3.50 m and deepe . Finally, a he bo om o he sha , a a dep h o 6.50 m and di ec ly connec ed o he en ance in o he bu ial chambe , he emains o nume ous agmen s o po e y we e ound ( ig. 11). This clus e consis ed mainly o s ands, as well as a ully p ese ed b ead o m and she ds o ine po e y, including a bowl wi h a hick laye o a ine whi e subs ance inside, e y likely plas e in ended o coa ing. This bowl (44-5.AS68d.2012) is o Abusi ype B-2c, namely wi h ben -sided walls and a spou ed im ( ig. 12). Bo h cu ed spou s we e ound, al hough he essel was p ese ed only o abou 55 % o i s diame e . The use o such ine po e y as a con aine o plas e is less usual, bu in p inciple i e lec s he simila disco e y o a bee ja base wi h mo a illing a he bo om o Sha 1 and has o be in e p e ed in a simila way (see sup a). This was no he only ine po e y used as a con aine o plas e – he con ex in on o he sealing wall con ained agmen s o ano he essel, o much less usual shape, also wi h a laye o whi e subs ance on i s inne walls. I is e y small, wi h an ape u e diame e o only 18.50 cm and a heigh o 9.50 cm. The mos unusual ea u es a e i s