Integral bases and monogenity of pure fields
Full text
In eg al bases and monogeni y o pu e ields
Is ´an Ga´al∗
, and L´aszl´o Reme e
Uni e si y o Deb ecen, Ma hema ical Ins i u e
H–4002 Deb ecen P .400., Hunga y
e–mail: gaal.is [email p o ec ed]u, [email p o ec ed]u
Ap il 26, 2016
Abs ac
Le mbe a squa e- ee in ege (m6= 0,1). We show ha he s uc-
u e o he in eg al bases o he ields K=Q(n
√m) a e pe iodic in m.
Fo 3 ≤n≤9 we show ha he pe iod leng h is n2. We explici ly de-
sc ibe he in eg al bases, and o n= 3,4,5,6,8 we explici ly calcula e
he index o ms o K. This enables us in many cases o cha ac e ize
he monogeni y o hese ields. Using he explici o m o he index
o ms yields a new echnics ha enables us o de i e new esul s on
monogeni y and o ge se e al o me esul s as easy consequences.
Fo n= 4,6,8 we gi e an almos comple e cha ac e iza ion o he
monogeni y o pu e ields.
1 In oduc ion
Le mbe a squa e- ee in ege (m6= 0,1) and n≥2 a posi i e in ege . The e
is an ex ensi e li e a u e o pu e ields o ype K=Q(n
√m). (Desc ibing he
∗Resea ch suppo ed in pa by K115479 om he Hunga ian Na ional Founda ion o
Scien i ic Resea ch
2010 Ma hema ics Subjec Classi ica ion: P ima y 11R04; Seconda y 11Y50
Key wo ds and ph ases: pu e ields, in eg al basis, powe in eg al basis, monogeni y
ollowing esul s on pu e ields we use some basic concep s on monogeni y
and powe in eg al bases ha a e de ailed in Sec ion 2.)
B.K.Spea man and K.S.Williams [14] ga e an explici o mula o he
in eg al basis o pu e cubic ields. B.K.Spea man, Y.Qiduan and J.Yoo [13]
showed ha i iis a cube ee posi i e in ege hen he e exis in ini ely many
pu e cubic ields wi h minimal index equal o i. I.Ga´al and T.Szab´o [11]
s udied he beha iou o he minimal indices o pu e cubic ields in e ms o
he disc iminan . L. El Fadil [12] ga e condi ions o he exis ence o powe
in eg al bases o pu e cubic ields in e ms o he index o m equa ion.
T.Funaku a [7] s udied he in eg al basis in pu e qua ic ields. I.Ga´al
and L.Reme e [9] calcula ed elemen s o index 1 (wi h coe icien s <101000)
in pu e qua ic ields K=Q(4
√m) o 1 < m < 107,m≡2,3 (mod 4).
S.Ahmad, T.Nakaha a and S.M.Husnine [3] showed ha i m≡1 (mod
4), m6≡ ±1 (mod 9) hen Q(6
√m) is no monogenic. On he o he hand [4],
i m≡2,3 (mod 4), m6≡ ±1 (mod 9) hen Q(6
√m) is monogenic.
A.Hameed and T.Nakaha a [1] cons uc ed in eg al bases o pu e oc ic
ields Q(8
√m). They p o ed [2] ha i m≡1 (mod 4) hen Q(8
√m) is no
monogenic. On he o he hand A.Hameed, T.Nakaha a, S.M.Husnine and
S.Ahmad [5] p o ed ha i m≡2,3 (mod 4) hen Q(8
√m) is monogenic.
A.Hameed, T.Nakaha a, S.M.Husnine and S.Ahmad [5] showed ha i
m≡2,3 (mod 4) hen Q(2n
√m) is monogenic, his in ol es he pu e qua ic
and pu e oc ic ields, as well. Mo eo e , hey showed [5] ha i all he p ime
ac o s o ndi ide m hen Q(n
√m) is monogenic.
Ou pu pose is o 3 ≤n≤9 o gi e a gene al cha ac e iza ion o he
in eg al basis o K=Q(n
√m). We p o e ha he in eg al bases o K=
Q(n
√m) is pe iodic in m. Fo 3 ≤n≤9 he pe iod leng h is n2.
The knowledge o he in eg al bases makes possible also o compe e he
spo adic esul s on he monogeni y o hese ields. Ou me hod applying
he explici o m o he index o ms yields a new echnics ha enables us o
ob ain new esul s on he monogeni y o hese ields and o ob ain se e al
o me esul s as easy consequences.
In ou Theo ems 4, 7, 8 we gi e an almos comple e cha ac e iza ion o
he monogeni y pu e qua ic, sex ic and oc ic ields, espec i ely. The cubic
case is well-known and easy, much less is known abou he quin ic, sep ic
and nonic cases.
2
2 Basic concep s abou he monogeni y o num-
be ields
We ecall hose concep s [8] ha we use h oughou . Le αbe a p imi i e
in eg al elemen o he numbe ield K( ha is K=Q(α)) o deg ee nwi h
ing o in ege s ZK. The index o αis
I(α) = (Z+
K:Z[α]+) = s
D(α)
DK
=1
p|DK|Y
1≤i<j≤nα(i)−α(j),
whe e DKis he disc iminan o Kand α(i)deno e he conjuga es o α. The
minimal index o Kis
iK= min I(α)
whe e α uns h ough he p imi i e in eg al elemen s o K.
I B= (b1= 1, b2, . . . , bn) is an in eg al basis o K, hen he index o m
co esponding o his in eg al basis is
I(x2, . . . , xn) = 1
p|DK|Y
1≤i<j≤n(b(i)
2−b(j)
2)x2+. . . + (b(i)
n−b(j)
n)xn
(whe e b(i)
jdeno e he conjuga es o bj) which is a homogeneous polynomial
wi h in eg al coe icien s. Fo he in eg al elemen
α=x1+b2x2+. . . +bnxn
we ha e
I(α) = |I(x2, . . . , xn)|
independen ly o x1.αgene a es a powe in eg al basis (1, α, . . . , αn−1) i
and only i I(α) = 1 ha is (x2, . . . , xn)∈Zn−1is a solu ion o he index
o m equa ion
I(x2, . . . , xn) = ±1 in(x2, . . . , xn)∈Zn−1.(1)
In his case
ZK=Z[α]
and Kis called monogenic.
3
3 Basic esul s
Th oughou we assume ha mis a squa e- ee in ege wi h m6= 0,1 and
n > 2 an in ege . Le K=Q(n
√m) and ϑ=n
√m.
Ou i s heo em is on he p ime di iso s o he denomina o s o he
in eg al basis elemen s:
Theo em 1. I (1, ϑ, . . . , ϑn−1)is no an in eg al basis in K, hen o any
elemen
α=a0+a1ϑ+. . . +an−1ϑn−1
q(2)
o he in eg al basis (wi h a0, . . . , an−1, q ∈Z,q6= 0) he denomina o qcan
only be di isible by p imes di iding n, he p ime ac o s o qdo no di ide
m.
P oo
The disc iminan o ϑ=n
√mis ±nnmn−1. I (1, ϑ, . . . , ϑn−1) is no an
in eg al basis in Q(ϑ), hen he e mus be a numbe qdi iding nnmn−1and
an elemen αo ype (2) such ha αis an algeb aic in ege and an elemen o
(1, ϑ, . . . , ϑn−1) can be eplaced by α o ge a basis wi h smalle disc iminan .
Le pbe a p ime di iso o q. Then ob iously
α0=q
pα=e0+e1ϑ+. . . +en−1ϑn−1
p(3)
is also an algeb aic in ege . We can also assume ha 0 ≤ei< p (0 ≤i≤
n−1) by aking each eimodulo p.
We show ha pis a di iso o n.
Assume on he con a y ha p|m. The elemen
α0ϑ=e0ϑ+e1ϑ2+. . . +en−2ϑn−1+en−1m
p
is ob iously an algeb aic in ege . By p|m he elemen
e0ϑ+e1ϑ2+. . . +en−2ϑn−1
p
4
is also an algeb aic in ege . We p oceed by mul iplying his elemen by ϑ
and omi ing he analogous in eg al pa . Finally we ob ain ha
%=e0ϑn−1
p
is an algeb aic in ege . The elemen %is he oo o he polynomial
%(x) = pxn−en
0m
pn−1
.
This polynomial is i educible o e Qi and only i i s ecip ocal polynomial
1/%(x) = en
0m
pn−1
xn−p.
is i educible. He e m/p is an in ege , no di isible by pbecause mis squa e-
ee. e0is also no di isible by p(o he wise we did no ha e e0in (3) and we
had he same esul wi h he i s non-ze o ei). Hence 1/%(x) is an Eisen-
ein polynomial, he e o e %(x) is i educible. Then %(x) is he de ining
polynomial o %. This con adic s o %being an algeb aic in ege . 2
Rema k. Theo em 1 implies Theo em 3.1. o A.Hameed, T.Nakaha a,
S.M.Husnine and S.Ahmad [5]: i all he p ime ac o s o ndi ide m hen
Q(n
√m) is monogenic.
Nex we show ha he in eg al bases o K=Q(n
√m) a e pe iodic. Fi s
we p o e his s a emen wi h a pe iod leng h much la ge han n2bu his
esul is alid o any n.
Theo em 2. Le n=ph1
1. . . phk
kand n0=p[nh1/2]
1. . . p[nhk/2]
kwhe e [x]deno es
he lowe in ege pa o x. Le ϑ=n
√mand γ=n
√m+nn
0. Then he
s uc u e o he in eg al bases o he ields Q(ϑ)and Q(γ)is he same in
e ms o ϑand γ, espec i ely.
Rema k. Unde he ”same s uc u e” we mean ha i he in eg al basis o
Q(ϑ) has an elemen
a0+a1ϑ+. . . +an−1ϑn−1
q,
5
hen he in eg al basis o Q(γ) has an elemen
a0+a1γ+. . . +an−1γn−1
q
and ice e sa.
P oo
Assume ha (1, ϑ, . . . , ϑn−1) is no an in eg al basis in Q(ϑ). Then he e
mus be in ege elemen s o ype
α=a0+a1ϑ+. . . +an−1ϑn−1
q(4)
which can eplace elemen s o (1, ϑ, . . . , ϑn−1) o ob ain an in eg al basis.
We show ha he exis ence o analogous algeb aic in ege s o ype (4) is
equi alen in he ields gene a ed by ϑ=n
√mand by γ=n
√m+nn
0.
I we eplace an elemen o he basis (1, ϑ, . . . , ϑn−1) by αo (4) hen he
disc iminan o he basis dec eases by a ac o q2. Hence q2di ides ±nnmn−1
( he disc iminan o ϑ=n
√mis ±nnmn−1). By Theo em 1 he p ime di iso s
po qdo no di ide m. Hence q2|nn, which implies ha qdi ides n0.
Deno e he conjuga es o αby α(j), j = 1, . . . , n. The de ining polynomial
o αis
n
Y
j=1
(x−α(j)) = 1
qn
n
Y
j=1
(qx −a0−a1ϑ(j)−. . . −an−1(ϑ(j))n−1).
The p oduc is a symme ical polynomial o ϑ(1), . . . , ϑ(n), hence i s coe -
icien s can be exp essed as polynomials (wi h in ege coe icien s) o he
de ining polynomial o ϑ, ha is xn−m. Hence he e exis polynomials
P0, . . . , Pn−1∈Z[x] such ha
n
Y
j=1
(x−α(j)) = 1
qn((qx)n+Pn−1(m)(qx)n−1+. . . +P1(m)(qx) + P0(m)).
The e o e he elemen αis an algeb aic in ege i and only i qn|qjPj(m) ha
is
qn−j|Pj(m) (j= 0,1, . . . , n −1).(5)
6
Replace now mby m0=m+nn
0and conside in eg al bases in he ield
Q(γ) = Q(n
√m+nn
0). In his ield an elemen o ype (4), ha is
δ=a0+a1γ+. . . +an−1γn−1
q(6)
is an algeb aic in ege i and only i
qn−j|Pj(m+nn
0) (j= 0,1...,n−1) (7)
wi h he same polynomials Pj. By q|n0 he condi ions (5) a e equi alen o
(7). The e o e Q(ϑ) and Q(γ) con ains he same ype o in ege elemen s.
Elemen s o ha ype a e linea ly independen in he i s case i and only i
hey a e linea ly independen in he second case. The e o e Q(ϑ) and Q(γ)
admi s he same ype o in eg al bases. 2
4 The s uc u e o he in eg al bases is
pe iodic in mmodulo n2 o 3≤n≤9
Theo em 2 implies ha he in eg al bases o K=Q(n
√m) a e pe iodic mod-
ulo nn
0. This numbe is o magni ude nn2/2. Fo small alues o nwe ha e a
much sha pe asse ion.
Theo em 3. Fo 3≤n≤9 he in eg al bases o Q(n
√m)a e pe iodic in m
modulo n2.
P oo
Fo n= 3,4,5 he nn
0is 27, 655536, 9765625, espec i ely. Calcula ing he
in eg al bases o Q(n
√m) o squa e- ee mup o nn
0i is easily seen ha he
s uc u e o he in eg al bases o Q(n
√m) a e pe iodic modulo n2. One can
easily de ec a ew ypes o in eg al bases ha a e epea ed o squa e- ee
alues o m,m+n2,m+ 2n2e c.
Le now n > 5. Then nn
0is a oo la ge o he calcula ions desc ibed
abo e. Howe e o n= 6,7,8,9 we managed o p o e he same asse ion.
7
Le 1 < < n2. I is squa e- ee, hen se 0= . I has a common
squa e ac o wi h n, hen none o +kn2is squa e- ee, we omi . I has
no common squa e ac o wi h nbu con ains ano he squa e ac o , hen we
se 0= +n2o 0= + 2n2e c. which is al eady squa e- ee.
Le ϑ=n
√ 0, calcula e he in eg al bases o Q(n
√ 0) and deno e he basis
elemen s by (b1= 1, b2, . . . , bn), whe e bjis o he o m
bj=aj0+aj1ϑ+. . . +aj,n−1ϑn−1
q
(wi h aj0, aj1, . . . , aj,n−1∈Zand wi h a non-ze o denomina o q he p ime
ac o s o which di ide n).
Le m= +kn2be a squa e- ee in ege , γ=n
√mand
b0
j=aj0+aj1γ+. . . +aj,n−1γn−1
q.
We wonde
I. i he analogues o he elemen s bj, ha is he elemen s b0
j emain algeb aic
in ege o any squa e- ee m= +kn2, u he
II. i o some squa e- ee m= +kn2some o he basis elemen s (b0
1=
1, b0
2, . . . , b0
n) can be eplaced by an in eg al elemen o ype
d=e1b0
1+. . . +enb0
n
p(8)
(whe e 0 ≤e1, . . . , en≤p−1 and pis a p ime di iso o n) o ob ain a basis
wi h smalle disc iminan .
I. The de ining polynomial o e1b0
1+. . . +enb0
nis
G(x) =
n
Y
j=1
(x−e1b0(j)
1−. . . −enb0(j)
n).
This polynomial is symme ical in he conjuga es o γ=n
√m, hence i s
coe icien s will be polynomials in m:
G(x) = xn+Gn−1(m)xn−1+. . . +G1(m)x+G0(m).
8
Since he e a e denomina o s in he b0
i, he polynomials Gj(depending also
on e1, . . . , en) a e no necessa ily o in ege coe icien s. Le us subs i u e
m= +kn2. We ob ain
G(x) = xn+Hn−1(k)xn−1+. . . +H1(k)x+H0(k).
Fo all possible esidues we ha e explici ly calcula ed hese polynomials
Hj(k) which also depend on e1, . . . , en. In all cases we ound ha hese a e
polynomials in k, e1, . . . , enwi h in ege coe icien s. Subs i u ing ei= 1 and
ej= 0, j = 1, . . . , n, j 6=i his implies ha b0
iis in ege o any squa e- ee
m= +kn2(1 ≤i≤n).
II.Conside now he de ining polynomial o d(8), ha is
P(x) = 1
pnG(px) = 1
pn(px)n+Hn−1(k)(px)n−1+. . . +H1(k)(px) + H0(k).
This polynomial has in ege coe icien s i and only i pndi ides pjHj(k) ha
is
pn−j|Hj(k) = Hj(k, e1, . . . , en) (0 ≤j≤n−1).(9)
Le now (e1, . . . , en)∈Znbe an a bi a y gi en ixed uple. Ob iously by
(9) he alidi y o he s a emen i dis in eg al o no , depends only on he
beha iou o kmodulo pnand no on he alue o k. This allows us o es
he ields Q(n
√m) o squa e- ee m= +kn2whe e k uns hough all esidue
classes modulo pn. These ields we e es ed di ec ly, calcula ing hei in eg al
bases. We ound ha in all cases he ields had he same s uc u e o in eg al
basis in e ms o γ=n
√mlike he ield Q(n
√ 0) in e ms o ϑ=n
√ 0. This
p o es ou asse ion. 2
Rema k The es desc ibed a he end o he abo e p oo equi ed o calcu-
la e he in eg al bases o
24(26+ 36) = 18239 sex ic ields,
48 ·77= 39530064 sep ic ields,
48 ·28= 12288 oc ic ields and
72 ·39= 1417176 nonic ields.
9
Case 6.3. = 10,19, m= + 36ksqua e- ee
1, x, x2, x3,1 + x2+x4
3,x+x3+x5
3, D = 2632m5
Calcula ing he index o m i is easily seen ha he index o m equa ion
is no sol able modulo 3, hence hese ields a e no monogenic. This case
is no co e ed by S. Ahmad, T. Nakaha a and S. M. Husnine [3], [4] since
m≡1 (mod 9).
Case 6.4. = 26,35, m= + 36ksqua e- ee
1, x, x2, x3,1+2x2+x4
3,x+ 2x3+x5
3, D = 2632m5
This case is no co e ed by S. Ahmad, T. Nakaha a and S. M. Husnine [3],
[4] since m≡ −1 (mod 9).
I m= 26+36k hen 4m|( 2−9 3). I Kis monogenic hen o a solu ion
o he index o m equa ion hese ac o s a e equal o ±1. The possible alues
o 2−9 3a e ±8,±10, hence he abo e di isibili y can no hold.
I m= 35 + 36k hen 4(35 + 36k)|( 2−9 3). I Kis monogenic hen
o a solu ion o he index o m equa ion hese ac o s a e equal o ±1. The
possible alues o 2−9 3a e ±8,±10, hence he abo e di isibili y can only
hold o k=−1, ha is m=−1. I is easily seen ha he ela i e index
[10] o elemen s o K=Q(6
√−1) is di isible by 9, he e o e his ield is no
monogenic, ei he .
Case 6.5. = 17, m= + 36ksqua e- ee
1, x, x2,1 + x3
2,4+3x+ 2x2+x4
6,4x+ 3x2+ 2x3+x5
6, D = 32m5
This case is no co e ed by S. Ahmad, T. Nakaha a and S. M. Husnine [3],
[4] since m≡ −1 ( mod 9). Calcula ing he index o m we can easily see ha
he index o m equa ion is no sol able modulo 6.
Case 6.6. m= 1, m= 1 + 36ksqua e- ee
1, x, x2,1 + x3
2,4+3x+ 4x2+x4
6,3+4x+ 3x2+x3+x5
6, D = 32m5
16
This case is no co e ed by S. Ahmad, T. Nakaha a and S. M. Husnine [3],
[4] since m≡1 (mod 9). Calcula ing he index o m we can easily see ha
he index o m equa ion is no sol able modulo 3.
Summa izing he abo e s a emen s we ha e
Theo em 7. Fo he ollowing alues o le m= + 36k(k∈Z) be a
squa e- ee in ege . The ield K=Q(6
√m)is monogenic o
= 2,3,6,7,11,14,15,22,23,30,31,34 and is no monogenic o
= 1,5,10,13,17,19,21,25,26,29,33,35.
6 Pu e sep ic ields, K=Q(7
√m)
Case 7.1. = 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,20,21,22,23,24,
25,26,27,28,29,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,
m= + 49ksqua e- ee
B={1, x, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6}, D =−m677
These ields a e ob iously monogenic.
Case 7.2. = 18, m= 18 + 49ksqua e- ee
B={1, x, x2, x3, x4, x5,1+2x+ 4x2+x3+ 2x4+ 4x5+x6
7}, D =−m675
Case 7.3. = 19, m= 19 + 49ksqua e- ee
B={1, x, x2, x3, x4, x5,1+3x+ 2x2+ 6x3+ 4x4+ 5x5+x6
7}, D =−m675
17
Case 7.4. = 30, m= 30 + 49ksqua e- ee
B={1, x, x2, x3, x4, x5,1+4x+ 2x2+x3+ 4x4+ 2x5+x6
7}, D =−m675
Case 7.5. = 31, m= 31 + 49ksqua e- ee
B={1, x, x2, x3, x4, x5,1+5x+ 4x2+ 6x3+ 2x4+ 3x5+x6
7}, D =−m675
Case 7.6. = 48, m= 48 + 49ksqua e- ee
B={1, x, x2, x3, x4, x5,1+6x+x2+ 6x3+x4+ 6x5+x6
7}, D =−m675
Case 7.7. = 1, m= 1 + 49ksqua e- ee
B={1, x, x2, x3, x4, x5,1 + x+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6
7}, D =−m675
7 Pu e oc ic ields, K=Q(8
√m)
In all hese cases he index o m is he p oduc o h ee ac o s o deg ees
4,8,16, espec i ely. We shall deno e hese ac o s by 1, 2, 3. These depend
on he pa ame e mand on he a iables x2, . . . , x8.
Case 8.1. = 2,3,6,7,10,11,14,15,18,19,22,23,26,27,30,31,34,35,38,
39,42,43,46,47,50,51,54,55,58,59,62,63, m= + 64ksqua e- ee
1, x, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, D =−88m7
18
These ields a e ob iously monogenic. This also ollows om A.Hameed,
T.Nakaha a, S.M.Husnine and S.Ahmad [5].
Case 8.2. = 1,17,33,49, m= + 64ksqua e- ee
1, x, x2, x3,1 + x4
2,x+x5
2,1 + x2+x4+x6
4,
1 + x+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7
8, D =−210m7
These ields a e no monogenic by he heo em o A.Hameed and T.Nakaha a
[2]. We conjec u e ha in hese ields he minimal index is 128.
Case 8.3. = 5,13,21,29,37,45,53,61, hese cases can be included by
m= 5 + 8k, squa e- ee
1, x, x2, x3,1 + x4
2,x+x5
2,x2+x6
2,x3+x7
2, D =−216m7
Calcula ing and ac o izing 3−16 2
2we ind ha i is di isible by m.
I he e exis ed a powe in eg al basis hen o a solu ion o he index o m
equa ion we would ha e 1, 2, 3=±1, hence 3−16 2
2=±1−16 is ei he
−15 o −17. The possible di iso s a e ±3,±5,±15,±17 bu only m=−3,5
is o ype m= 5 + 8k.
Fo m=−3 hen elemen (−1,−1,0,1,1,0,−1) has index one, hence
K=Q(8
√−3) is monogenic.
Fo m= 5 he leas index we ound in K=Q(8
√5) was 16.
No e ha A.Hameed, T.Nakaha a, S.M.Husnine and S.Ahmad [2] asse
ha hese ields a e no monogenic, hey ce ainly did no in ol e K=
Q(8
√−3).
Case 8.4. = 9,25,41,57, hese cases can be included by m= 9 + 16k,
squa e- ee
1, x, x2, x3,1 + x4
2,x+x5
2,1 + x2+x4+x6
4,x+x3+x5+x7
4, D =−212m7
19
Calcula ing and ac o izing 2−4 2
1we ind ha i is di isible by m. I he e
exis ed a powe in eg al basis hen o a solu ion o he index o m equa ion
we would ha e 1, 2, 3=±1, hence 2−4 2
1=±1−4 is ei he −3 o −5.
The possible di iso s a e ±3,±5 bu none o hem is o ype m= 9 + 16k.
The e o e hese ields a e no monogenic. This also ollows om he heo em
o A.Hameed, T.Nakaha a, S.M.Husnine and S.Ahmad [2].
Summa izing he abo e s a emen s we ha e
Theo em 8. Fo he ollowing alues o le m= + 64k(k∈Z) be a
squa e- ee in ege . The ield K=Q(8
√m)is monogenic o
= 2,3,6,7,10,11,14,15,18,19,22,23,26,27,30,31,34,35,38,39,42,43,46,
47,50,51,54,55,58,59,62,63 and is no monogenic o
= 1,5,9,13,17,21,25,29,33,37,41,45,49,53,57,61,m6= 5, wi h he ex-
cep ion o K=Q(8
√−3) which is monogenic.
Rema k 9. We conjec u e ha he minimal index o K=Q(8
√5) is 16.
Oc ic ields o his ype will be conside ed in a o ecoming pape .
8 Pu e nonic ields, K=Q(9
√m)
Case 9.1. = 2,3,4,5,6,7,11,12,13,14,15,16,20,21,22,23,24,25,29,30,
31,32,33,34,38,39,40,41,42,43,47,48,49,50,51,52,56,57,58,59,60,61,65,
66,67,68,69,70,74,75,76,77,78,79, m= + 81k, squa e- ee
1, x, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, D = 318m8
These ields a e ob iously monogenic.
Case 9.2. = 1,28,55, m= + 81k, squa e- ee
1, x, x2, x3, x4, x5,1 + x3+x6
3,x+x4+x7
3,
20
1 + x+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x7+x8
9, D = 310m8
Case 9.3. = 8,17,35,44,62,71, m= + 81k, squa e- ee
1, x, x2, x3, x4, x5,1+2x3+x6
3,x+ 2x4+x7
3,x2+ 2x5+x8
3, D = 312m8
Case 9.4. = 10,19,37,46,64,73, m= + 81k, squa e- ee
1, x, x2, x3, x4, x5,1 + x3+x6
3,x+x4+x7
3,x2+x5+x8
3, D = 312m8
Case 9.5. = 26,53,80, m= + 81k, squa e- ee
1, x, x2, x3, x4, x5,1+2x3+x6
3,x+ 2x4+x7
3,
1+2x+x2+ 8x3+ 7x4+ 8x5+x6+ 2x7+x8
9, D = 310m8
9 Compu a ional ema ks
In all ou calcula ions we used Maple [6] and mos o ou p og ams execu ed
a couple o seconds o a ew minu es on an a e age lap op. Fo n= 4,6,8
we needed a e y ca e ul calcula ion o he ac o s o he index o ms, which
may ake ex emely long o he wise.
The es s co esponding o Theo em 3 ook also a ew minu es o n=
3,4,5,6,8. Fo n= 9 i execu ed 5 hou s. Fo n= 7 we execu ed ou Malpe
p og am on a supe compu e wi h nodes ha ing 24 CPU-s. The unning
ime on one node was 10 hou s pe emainde . We had 48 emainde s and
he p og am was unning on 10 nodes pa allelly.
21
Re e ences
[1] A.Hameed and T.Nakaha a, In eg al bases and ela i e monogeni y o
pu e oc ic ields, Bull. Ma h. Soc. Sci. Ma h. R´epub. Soc. Roum., Nou .
S´e . 58(106)(2015) No.4, 419–433.
[2] A.Hameed and T.Nakaha a, On pu e oc ic ields ela ed o a p oblem o
Hasse, manusc ip .
[3] S. Ahmad, T. Nakaha a and S. M. Husnine, Non-monogenesis o a amily
o pu e sex ic ields, A ch. Sci. (Gene a) 65(2012), No. 7, 42-49.
[4] S.Ahmad, T.Nakaha a and S.M.Husnine, Powe in eg al bases o ce -
ain pu e sex ic ields, In . J. Numbe Theo y 10(2014), No. 8, 2257–
2265.
[5] A.Hameed, T.Nakaha a, S.M.Husnine and S.Ahmad, On exis ence o
canonical numbe sys em in ce ain classes o pu e algeb aic numbe
ields, J. P ime Resea ch in Ma hema ics, 7(2011), 19–24.
[6] B.W.Cha , K.O.Geddes, G.H.Gonne , M.B.Monagan, S.M.Wa (eds.)
MAPLE, Re e ence Manual, Wa com Publica ions, Wa e loo, Canada,
1988.
[7] T.Funaku a, On in eg al bases o pu e qua ic ields, Ma h. J. Okayama
Uni . 26(1984), 27–41.
[8] Diophan ine equa ions and powe in eg al bases, Bos on, Bi kh¨ause ,
2002.
[9] I.Ga´al and L.Reme e, Binomial Thue equa ions and powe in eg al bases
in pu e qua ic ields JP Jou nal o Algeb a Numbe Theo y Appl.
32(2014), No. 1, 49–61.
[10] I.Ga´al, L.Reme e and T.Szab´o, Calcula ing powe in eg al bases by using
ela i e powe in eg al bases Func iones e App oxima io, o appea .
22
[11] I.Ga´al and T.Szab´o, A no e on he minimal indices o pu e cubic ields,
JP Jou nal o Algeb a Numbe Theo y Appl. 19(2010), No. 2, 129–139.
[12] L. El Fadil, Compu a ion o a powe in eg al basis o a pu e cubic numbe
ield, In . J. Con emp. Ma h. Sci. 2(2007), No. 13–16, 601–606.
[13] B.K.Spea man, Y.Qiduan and J.Yoo, Minimal indices o pu e cubic
ields, A ch. Ma h. 106(2016), No.1, 35–40.
[14] B.K.Spea man and K.S.Williams, An explici in eg al basis o a pu e
cubic ield, Fa Eas J. Ma h. Sci. 6(1998), No. 1, 1–14.
23