scieee Open visual document viewer

Study of resonance formation in the mass region 1400-1500 MeV through the reaction gamma gamma -> K0sK+-Pi-+

Achard, Pablo; Nagy, Sándor; Raics, Péter; Szillási, Zoltán

Full text

JHEP03(2007)018 Published by Ins i u e o Physics Publishing o SISSA Recei ed: Decembe 12, 2006 Accep ed: Feb ua y 1, 2007 Published: Ma ch 6, 2007 S udy o esonance o ma ion in he mass egion 1400 −1500 MeV h ough he eac ion γγ→K0 SK±π∓ L3 Collabo a ion Abs ac : The K0 SK±π∓ inal s a e in wo-pho on collisions is s udied wi h he L3 de ec o a LEP a e+e−cen e-o -mass ene gies om 183 o 209 GeV wi h an in eg a ed luminosi y o 664.6 pb−1. The η(1475) and 1(1420) mesons a e obse ed and hei con ibu ion is sepa a ed by measu ing he o ma ion a es as a unc ion o he pho on i uali y Q2. The η(1475) is ound o be dominan o Q2≤0.01 GeV2and i s wo-pho on wid h is measu ed o be 0.23 ±0.05 (s a .) ±0.05 (sys.) keV. A highe Q2, he 1(1420) is o med and decays o K∗(892)K. The γγ coupling and o m ac o pa ame e s o his s a e a e measu ed o be Γγγ = 3.2±0.6 (s a .) ±0.7 (sys.) keV and Λ1= 926 ±72 (s a .) ±32 (sys.) MeV, espec i ely. Keywo ds: e+-e- Expe imen s. c °SISSA 2007 h p://jhep.sissa.i /a chi e/pape s/jhep032007018 /jhep032007018.pd JHEP03(2007)018 Con en s 1. In oduc ion 1 2. Mon e Ca lo gene a o s 3 3. E en selec ion 4 4. Resul s 4 4.1 Q2dependence 4 4.2 Global i 7 4.3 Sys ema ic unce ain ies 8 4.4 The η(1475) esonance 9 4.5 The 1(1420) esonance 10 4.6 The 1(1420)→K∗(892)K decay 11 5. Conclusion 11 1. In oduc ion The s udy o esonance o ma ion by wo i ual pho ons is well sui ed o classi y q¯q s a es in o SU(3) none s. Only C= +1 esonances can be o med and hei wo-pho on wid h can be calcula ed in he amewo k o qua k models. As di ec gluon-pho on coupling is o bidden, gluonium s a es a e supp essed and he absence o a well-es ablished esonance in he wo-pho on mass spec um may be a signa u e o a gluon- ich pa onic s uc u e. This Le e p esen s a s udy o esonance o ma ion by wo i ual pho ons in he e- ac ion e+e−→e+e−γγ →e+e−K0 SK±π∓. Un agged wo-pho on collisions a e conside ed, co esponding o cases whe e he ou going elec on and posi on ca y almos he ull beam ene gy and a e no de ec ed. The da a used o his analysis we e collec ed wi h he L3 de ec o [1] a LEP a e+e−cen e-o -mass ene gies, √s, be ween 183 GeV and 209 GeV, comp ising a o al in eg a ed luminosi y o 664.6 pb−1. In he mass egion 1400 −1500 MeV, wo pseudoscala mesons (JP C = 0−+), η(1405) and η(1475), and an axial ec o meson (JP C = 1++), 1(1420), a e obse ed in he K0 SK±π∓ inal s a e [2]. The η(1405), obse ed in J/ψ(1S) adia i e decay and p¯p collisions a es , also decays in o ηππ while he η(1475) decays p edominan ly o K ¯ Kπ. In a p e ious Le e [3] we epo ed he obse a ion o he pseudoscala η(1475) and o he axial ec o 1(1420) in he K0 SK±π∓ inal s a e, bu no e idence was ound o he η(1405) ei he in he K0 SK±π∓o in he ηπ+π− inal s a e. The η(1475) can be iden i ied as he i s adial exci a ion o he η0[4, 5], while he η(1405) could be a gluonium candida e. The – 1 – JHEP03(2007)018 axial ec o 1(1420) was p e iously obse ed in wo-pho on collisions in he K¯ Kπ inal s a e by se e al expe imen s [6 – 9]. A ecen sea ch o η(1475) →K0 SK±π∓by he CLEO Collabo a ion in un agged wo-pho on e en s ga e a nega i e esul [10]. The same s udy obse ed he p oduc ion o he axial ec o s 1(1285) and 1(1420) in agged wo-pho on collisions [10]. This Le e p esen s an analysis o he K0 SK±π∓ inal s a e wi h he en i e L3 s a is ics ob ained du ing he high-ene gy LEP uns. This s a is ics is 50% highe han ha used p e iously [3]. In o de o sepa a e he 1(1420) om he η(1475), he o ma ion o he esonances is s udied as a unc ion o he ans e se momen um squa ed o he K0 SK±π∓ sys em, P2 T. To a good app oxima ion, P2 T=Q2, whe e Q2is he la ges i uali y o he wo in e ac ing pho ons. P oduc ion o spin-one esonances is o bidden o eal pho ons, acco ding o he Landau-Yang heo em [11]. The e o e, a low Q2, s a es wi h spin J6= 1 domina e. The c oss sec ion o a esonance Ro mass M, spin J, pa i y P, cha ge conjuga ion Cand wid h Γ is: σγγ→R= 8π(2J+ 1) ΓγγΓ (W2−M2)2+ Γ2M2F2 JP C (Q2),(1.1) whe e Wis he wo-pho on mass, Γγγ, he wo-pho on wid h, and F2 JP C (Q2) he squa e o he o m ac o . Fo a spin-one esonance, 1, he γγ-coupling pa ame e is de ined [2] as Γγγ( 1) = lim Q2→0 M2 Q2ΓTS γγ∗, wi h ΓTS γγ∗ he pa ial wid h o he ans e se-scala wo-pho on in e ac ion. In he ollowing, he model o Re e ence [12] is used. I is based on a ha d-sca e ing app oach [13] and desc ibes he Q2dependence o he o m ac o s as: F2 0−+(Q2) = 1 (1 + Q2/Λ2 0)2(1.2) and F2 1++ (Q2) = Q2 M2µ1 + Q2 2M2¶2 (1 + Q2/Λ2 1)4,(1.3) whe e Λ0and Λ1a e pseudoscala and axial- ec o meson o m- ac o pa ame e s, espec- i ely. The alues o Λ0and Λ1a e expec ed o be equal o he ho mass, mρ, o ligh mesons and o be close o he esonance mass o hea ie s a es [12]. The di e en be- ha iou o he wo o m ac o s as a unc ion o Q2is p esen ed in igu e 1. The same model was used o he analysis o he 1(1285) →η π+π− inal s a e and ound o ep oduce well he Q2-dependence o esonance o ma ion [14]. In con as , he model p oposed in Re e ence [15] and used in p e ious analyses [6, 7] wi h a o m ac o F2 1++ (Q2) = Q2 M2µ1 + Q2 2M2¶2 (1 + Q2/m2 ρ)2(1.4) was excluded by he da a [14]. – 2 – JHEP03(2007)018 η(1475) 1(1420) Q2 (GeV2) F2(Q2) 10 -1 1 0246810 Figu e 1: Dependence on Q2o he squa e o he o m ac o s o he η(1475) (solid line) and 1(1420) (dashed line) mesons. The o m ac o pa ame e s o o mulae (1.2) and (1.3) a e chosen as Λ0= 1470 MeV and Λ1= 1420 MeV, espec i ely. 2. Mon e Ca lo gene a o s Two Mon e Ca lo gene a o s a e used in his s udy o desc ibe wo-pho on esonance o ma ion: EGPC [16] and GaGaRes [17]. The EGPC Mon e Ca lo desc ibes he wo-pho on p ocess as he p oduc o he lu- minosi y unc ion o ans e se pho ons [18] and he esonance p oduc ion c oss sec ion. I is used o une e en selec ion c i e ia and calcula e selec ion e iciencies. The de- cay dis ibu ions o he esonance a e gene a ed acco ding o Lo en z in a ian phase- space. Abou 105Mon e Ca lo e en s a e gene a ed o each o h ee esonance masses: 1.41 GeV,1.44 GeV and 1.48 GeV. Only one alue o he e+e−cen e -o -mass ene gy is gen- e a ed, √s= 189 GeV, since de ec o e iciencies and Q2dis ibu ions a e ound o ha e a e y weak dependence on √s o he ene gy ange in es iga ed. The e en s a e passed h ough he L3 de ec o simula ion based on he GEANT [19] and GEISHA [20] p og ams. Time-dependen de ec o e iciencies, as moni o ed du ing he da a- aking pe iod, a e also simula ed. The GaGaRes gene a o , which calcula es a ma ix elemen o he p ocess e+e−→ e+e−R, desc ibes he Q2dependence o esonance o ma ion acco ding o he o m ac o s gi en in o mulae (1.2) and (1.3). I is used o compa e he expe imen al c oss sec ions – 3 – JHEP03(2007)018 wi h he expec a ions and o ex ac he esonance pa ame e s Γγγ(η), Γγγ( 1), Λ0and Λ1. 3. E en selec ion The e en s a e collec ed by wo cha ged- ack igge s. The i s igge [21] equi es a leas wo wide-angle acks, back- o-back wi hin ±41◦in he plane ans e se o he beam. The second igge [22] is based on an a i icial neu al ne wo k which was ained o selec low-mul iplici y e en s while ejec ing beam-gas and beam-wall backg ound. The p ocedu e o selec e+e−→e+e−K0 SK±π∓e en s is simila o ha used in he p e ious analysis [3]. E en s a e selec ed by equi ing ou cha ged pa icles in he cen al acke associa ed o wo e ices: wo acks associa ed o he e+e−in e ac ion poin , and a pai o acks coming om a seconda y e ex, co esponding o K0 Sdecay in o π+π−. The acks mus ha e mo e han 9 hi s and he numbe o hi s mus be g ea e han 60% o ha expec ed om he ack leng h. The seconda y e ex mus be a leas 2 mm away om he e+e−in e ac ion poin in he plane ans e se o he beam. The mass o he π+π−sys em, shown in igu e 2a, mus be in he ange 470 −520 MeV. The K±and π∓ acks a e iden i ied by he dE/dxmeasu emen s shown in igu e 2b. Fo each pai o pa icles, a join χ2is calcula ed o he hypo heses π+π−, K+K−o K±π∓. The iden i ica ion equi es a con idence le el (CL) g ea e han 5% o he hypo hesis K±π∓ while he cha ge-conjuga e hypo hesis, K∓π±, mus ha e a CL<3%, in o de esol e he K−πambigui y. The hypo heses π+π−and K+K−mus ha e a CL<10%. Since he 4πbackg ound is highe a low Q2, he con idence le el o dE/dxiden i ica ion o he hypo hesis π+π−is lowe ed o 0.1% o Q2<0.12 GeV2. Fo Q2>0.4 GeV2, he dE/dx pe o mance deg ades, bu he backg ound is lowe , he e o e e en s a e accep ed i hey sa is y one o he ollowing equi emen s: he same dE/dxc i e ia as o he 0.12 < Q2< 0.4 GeV2 ange; all acks ha e a leas 20 hi s; he seconda y e ex is a leas 4 mm away in he ans e se plane om he e+e−in e ac ion poin . E en s wi h candida e pho ons a e ejec ed. An elec omagne ic clus e , wi h ene gy g ea e han 100 MeV, is conside ed as a candida e pho on i i is sepa a ed om all acks by mo e han 0.2 adians. E en s wi h a second K0 Scandida e a e also ejec ed. This selec ion esul s in 820 e en s wi h a K0 SK±π∓e ec i e mass below 2.7 GeV and Q2in he ange 0 −7 GeV2. 4. Resul s 4.1 Q2dependence Fo he ollowing analysis, he da a is subdi ided in o i e Q2 anges lis ed in he i s column o able 1. The co esponding K0 SK±π∓e ec i e mass spec a o he i e Q2 anges a e p esen ed in igu e 3. A clea peak be ween 1.35 GeV and 1.55 GeV is p esen in each sub-sample. A high Q2- alues, ano he peak, which we associa e wi h he 1(1285) meson, is also seen. Each mass spec um o igu e 3 is i ed wi h a Gaussian unc ion o e a backg ound unc ion o he o m (W−1.16)2exp(p1+p2W2), whe e Wis he K0 SK±π∓mass and – 4 – JHEP03(2007)018 0 500 1000 1500 0.45 0.5 0.55 M(π+π−) (GeV) E en s / 4 MeV a) L3 Momen um (GeV) dE / dx (a bi a y uni s) L3 b) K candida es π candida es 0 1 2 3 4 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 Figu e 2: a) Spec um o he π+π−mass be o e any o he selec ion cu . The a ows indica e he K0 Scandida e window. b) The dE/dxdis ibu ion o cha ged pa icles a he e+e−in e ac ion e ex. Q2 ange ²T R (%) ²[ 1(1420)] (%) ²[η(1475)] (%) E en s M(MeV) σ(MeV) 0−0.01 92 ±2 0.51 ±0.03 0.53 ±0.03 43 ±9 1464 ±12 54 ±10 0.01 −0.12 94 ±2 0.49 ±0.05 0.45 ±0.05 40 ±9 1462 ±16 63 ±20 0.12 −0.4 91 ±2 0.82 ±0.10 0.79 ±0.09 32 ±7 1426 ±9 32 ±8 0.4−0.9 83 ±2 1.19 ±0.15 1.25 ±0.15 45 ±9 1453 ±9 42 ±9 0.9−7 67 ±5 1.92 ±0.24 1.78 ±0.22 33 ±10 1431 ±19 32 ±10 Table 1: Resul s o a Gaussian i o he peaks o he mass spec a o igu e 3. Fo each Q2 ange he igge e iciency, ²T R, he o e all e iciency o he esonances, ², he numbe o e en s, he mass, M, and he wid h, σ, o he Gaussian peak a e p esen ed. All unce ain ies a e s a is ical only. – 5 – JHEP03(2007)018 0 10 20 1 1.5 2 2.5 0 10 20 1 1.5 2 2.5 0 10 20 1 1.5 2 2.5 0 10 20 1 1.5 2 2.5 M(K0 S K±π ) (GeV) E en s / 40 MeV ± L3 Da a Fi Bkgd b) d) a) c) e) 0 10 20 1 1.5 2 2.5 Figu e 3: The K0 SK±π∓e ec i e mass spec a o i e Q2bins: a) 0 −0.01 GeV2; b) 0.01 − 0.12 GeV2; c) 0.12 −0.4 GeV2; d) 0.4−0.9 GeV2; e) 0.9−7 GeV2. Fi s o a Gaussian unc ion o e a Q2-dependen backg ound a e supe imposed on he da a. Fo spec a wi h Q2>0.12 GeV2, an addi ional Gaussian unc ion, ep esen ing he 1(1285), is added wi h ixed mass and wid h: M= 1282 MeV and σ= 20 MeV. 1.16 GeV is he edge o he mass spec um. Fo he spec a abo e Q2>0.12 GeV2, an addi ional Gaussian unc ion, ep esen ing he 1(1285), is added wi h a ixed mass, M= 1282 MeV [2], and a ixed wid h co esponding o he expe imen al mass esolu ion, σ= 20 MeV. The peak yield o each Q2- ange is p esen ed in able 1 oge he wi h he mass and wid h ob ained by he i . Table 1 also p esen s he igge e iciencies. These a e e alua ed by using he da a hemsel es compa ing he a es o wo independen igge s. The selec ion e iciencies a e also lis ed in he able. They a e de e mined as he a io o selec ed o gene a ed Mon e Ca lo e en s in he mass ange a ound he esonance peak. The e iciencies a e es ima ed o each Q2in e al. The igge e iciency dec eases a highe Q2due o he back- o-back equi emen imposed on he acks. In con as , he geome ical accep ance – 6 – JHEP03(2007)018 Q2 (GeV2) E en s L3 a) Da a η(1475) 1(1420) 0 25 50 75 100 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 1 Q2 (GeV2) E en s / ∆Q2 (1/GeV2) L3 b) Da a Global i η(1475) 1(1420) 1 10 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 1 Figu e 4: a) Numbe o e en s ob ained by he Gaussian i p esen ed in able 1 and igu e 3 compa ed o Mon e Ca lo p edic ions in p esence o a single esonance, ei he he η(1475) (do ed- dashed line) o he 1(1420) (dashed line). b) Numbe o e en s pe ∆Q2 ange obse ed in da a, oge he wi h he esul s a global i (solid line) including wo con ibu ions: 1(1420) (dashed line) and η(1475) (do ed-dashed line). In bo h igu es he unce ain ies a e s a is ical only. o he de ec o inc eases wi h inc easing Q2. The numbe s o e en s in he peak a e compa ed in igu e 4a o he expec a ions o he GaGaRes Mon e Ca lo o he o ma ion o a single pseudoscala meson, η(1475), o a single axial- ec o meson, 1(1420). A χ2compa ison o he i e bins o his his og am gi es a con idence le el o 3×10−4 o he 1(1420) hypo hesis and 6×10−9 o he η(1475) hypo hesis. The e o e he da a canno be desc ibed by a single pseudoscala o axial- ec o meson: bo h s a es mus be included in a i o he mass spec a. In addi ion, he e is no e idence ha also he o ma ion o η(1405) o 1(1510) mus be included, consis en wi h a gluon- ich pa onic s uc u e o hese s a es. 4.2 Global i The i e K0 SK±π∓mass spec a a e i ed simul aneously wi h a binned maximum- likelihood me hod, using a mass bin o 5 MeV,1in he hypo hesis o he p esence o bo h pseudoscala and axial- ec o esonances. The ela i e yield o he esonances as a unc- ion o Q2is ixed acco ding o he GaGaRes p og am. Each esonance is desc ibed by he con olu ion o a B ei -Wigne unc ion wi h a Gaussian esolu ion unc ion es ima ed by Mon e Ca lo. The esolu ion is o he o de o σ= 20 MeV. The ee pa ame e s o he i a e: he mass o each esonance; he η(1475) wid h; he Λ1pa ame e o he 1(1420) o m ac o and he o e all no malisa ion o each esonance. The 1(1420) wid h is ixed o he wo ld a e age alue, Γ = 55 MeV [2]. I his pa ame e is le ee he i becomes uns able. The Λ0pa ame e o he η(1475) o m ac o canno 1The bin wid h was a ied be ween 2 MeV and 6 MeV and no signi ican di e ence in he esul s was obse ed. – 7 – JHEP03(2007)018 S a e E en s M(MeV) Γ (MeV) ΓγγBR(K¯ Kπ) (keV) Λ (MeV) 1(1420) 133 ±23 1434 ±5±5 ixed o 55 3.2±0.6±0.7 926 ±72 ±31 η(1475) 74 ±16 1469 ±14 ±13 67 ±18 ±7 0.23 ±0.05 ±0.05 ixed o 1470 Table 2: Resul s o a global i o he mass spec a o igu e 5. The numbe o e en s, he mass, M, and he wid h, Γ, o he 1(1420) and η(1475) B ei -Wigne unc ions a e gi en. The wo-pho on wid h o he wo-pho on coupling pa ame e , Γγγ, imes he b anching a io o he decay o K ¯ Kπ, BR(K¯ Kπ), a e ex ac ed om he c oss sec ions, es ima ed wi h he GaGaRes p og am om he i ed numbe o e en s and he e iciencies o he esonances. The o m ac o pa ame e , Λ, is also lis ed. The i s unce ain y is s a is ical, he second sys ema ic. M(η(1475)) Γ(η(1475)) Γγγ (η(1475)) M( 1(1420)) Γγγ ( 1(1420)) Λ( 1(1420)) BR(K ¯ Kπ) BR(K ¯ Kπ) M(η(1475)) 1 Γ(η(1475)) −0.20 1 Γγγ (η(1475))BR(K ¯ Kπ) 0.09 −0.42 1 M( 1(1420)) −0.06 −0.11 −0.02 1 Γγγ ( 1(1420))BR(K ¯ Kπ) 0.38 −0.21 0.11 0.08 1 Λ( 1(1420)) −0.28 0.20 −0.20 −0.04 −0.69 1 Table 3: Co ela ion coe icien s o he ee pa ame e s o he global i shown in igu e 5. be de e mined as mos o he η(1475) da a is in a single bin. I is ixed o he heo e ical alue 1470 MeV [12]. As in he p e ious i a Q2-dependen backg ound is used. The pa ame e s p1and p2 o he backg ound a e de e mined sepa a ely in each Q2in e al and he 1(1285) is added o he backg ound unc ion in he high Q2in e als. The esul s o he i a e gi en in able 2 and p esen ed in igu es 4b and 5. The p oduc ion c oss sec ion is calcula ed om he numbe o e en s, he e iciency and he luminosi y. The wo-pho on wid h is hen ex ac ed by compa ing his c oss sec ion o ha es ima ed by he GaGaRes p og am. The co ela ion coe icien s o he pa ame e s o in e es a e gi en in able 3. A χ2compa ison o his i o he i e bins p esen ed in igu e 4b gi es a con idence le el o 22%. The o al numbe o e en s in he 1(1285) peak is ound o be 19.8±4.4. The limi ed s a is ics and he unce ain ies o he e iciency co ec ions a h eshold p e en u he in es iga ion o he o ma ion o his esonance. 4.3 Sys ema ic unce ain ies Di e en sou ces o sys ema ic unce ain ies on he η(1475) and 1(1420) pa ame e s a e conside ed, as lis ed in able 4. They a e es ima ed by a ying he selec ion cu s, he ixed pa ame e s o he i and aking in o accoun he unce ain ies on he o al e iciencies: •The K0 Smass window, shown by he a ows in igu e 2a, is ex ended o 465−525 MeV and na owed o 475 −515 MeV. •The cu on he dis ance, in he ans e se plane, o he K0 Sdecay e ex om he in e ac ion poin is a ied o 3 mm o Q2<0.4 GeV2and o 4 mm o highe Q2. – 8 – JHEP03(2007)018 17 INFN Sezione di Fi enze and Uni e si y o Flo ence, I-50125 Flo ence, I aly 18 Eu opean Labo a o y o Pa icle Physics, CERN, CH-1211 Gene a 23, Swi ze land 19 Wo ld Labo a o y, FBLJA P ojec , CH-1211 Gene a 23, Swi ze land 20 Uni e si y o Gene a, CH-1211 Gene a 4, Swi ze land 21 Uni e si y o Hambu g, D-22761 Hambu g, Ge many 22 Chinese Uni e si y o Science and Technology, USTC, He ei, Anhui 230 029, China4 23 Uni e si y o Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Swi ze land 24 Ins i u de Physique Nucl´eai e de Lyon, IN2P3-CNRS,Uni e si ´e Claude Be na d, F-69622 Villeu banne, F ance 25 Cen o de In es igaciones Ene g´e icas, Medioambien ales y Tecnol´ogicas, CIEMAT, E-28040 Mad id, Spain[ 26 Flo ida Ins i u e o Technology, Melbou ne, FL 32901, USA 27 INFN-Sezione di Milano, I-20133 Milan, I aly 28 Ins i u e o Theo e ical and Expe imen al Physics, ITEP, Moscow, Russia 29 INFN-Sezione di Napoli and Uni e si y o Naples, I-80125 Naples, I aly 30 Depa men o Physics, Uni e si y o Cyp us, Nicosia, Cyp us 31 Radboud Uni e si y and NIKHEF, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, The Ne he lands 32 Cali o nia Ins i u e o Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 33 INFN-Sezione di Pe ugia and Uni e si `a Degli S udi di Pe ugia, I-06100 Pe ugia, I aly 34 Nuclea Physics Ins i u e, S . Pe e sbu g, Russia 35 Ca negie Mellon Uni e si y, Pi sbu gh, PA 15213, USA 36 INFN-Sezione di Napoli and Uni e si y o Po enza, I-85100 Po enza, I aly 37 P ince on Uni e si y, P ince on, NJ 08544, USA 38 Uni e si y o Cali o na, Ri e side, CA 92521, USA 39 INFN-Sezione di Roma and Uni e si y o Rome, “La Sapienza”, I-00185 Rome, I aly 40 Uni e si y and INFN, Sale no, I-84100 Sale no, I aly 41 Uni e si y o Cali o nia, San Diego, CA 92093, USA 42 Bulga ian Academy o Sciences, Cen al Lab. o Mecha onics and Ins umen a ion, BU-1113 So ia, Bulga ia 43 The Cen e o High Ene gy Physics, Kyungpook Na ional Uni e si y, 702-701 Taegu, Republic o Ko ea 44 Na ional Cen al Uni e si y, Chung-Li, Taiwan, China 45 Depa men o Physics, Na ional Tsing Hua Uni e si y, Taiwan, China 46 Pu due Uni e si y, Wes La aye e, IN 47907, USA 47 Paul Sche e Ins i u , PSI, CH-5232 Villigen, Swi ze land 48 DESY, D-15738 Zeu hen, Ge many 49 Eidgen¨ossische Technische Hochschule, ETH Z¨u ich, CH-8093 Z¨u ich, Swi ze land §Suppo ed by he Ge man Bundesminis e ium ¨u Bildung, Wissenscha , Fo schung und Technologie. ‡Suppo ed by he Hunga ian OTKA und unde con ac numbe s T019181, F023259 and T037350. ¶Also suppo ed by he Hunga ian OTKA und unde con ac numbe T026178. [Suppo ed also by he Comisi´on In e minis e ial de Ciencia y Tecnolog´ıa. ]Also suppo ed by CONICET and Uni e sidad Nacional de La Pla a, CC 67, 1900 La Pla a, A gen ina. 4Suppo ed by he Na ional Na u al Science Founda ion o China. †Deceased. – 15 – JHEP03(2007)018 Re e ences [1] L3 collabo a ion, B. Ade a e al., The cons uc ion o he L3 expe imen ,Nucl. Ins um. Me h. A 289 (1990) 35; M. Accia i e al., The L3 silicon mic o e ex de ec o ,Nucl. Ins um. Me h. A 351 (1994) 300; M. Chema in e al., Tes beam esul s o an upg aded o wa d agge o he L3 expe imen a LEP II,Nucl. Ins um. Me h. A 349 (1994) 345; A. Adam e al., The o wa d muon de ec o o L3,Nucl. Ins um. Me h. A 383 (1996) 342; I.C. B ock e al., Luminosi y measu emen in he L3 de ec o a LEP,Nucl. Ins um. Me h. A 381 (1996) 236. [2] W.-M. Yao e al., Re iew o Pa icle Physics,J. Phys. G 33 (2006) 1. [3] L3 collabo a ion, M. Accia i e al., Ligh esonances in K0 sK±π∓and ηπ+π− inal s a es in γγ collisions a LEP,Phys. Le . B 501 (2001) 1 [hep-ex/0011035]. [4] A.V. Aniso ich, V.V. Aniso ich, V.A. Nikono and L. Mon ane , Pa ial wid hs o he decays η1295 →γγ and η1440 →γγ,Eu . Phys. J. A6 (1999) 247 [hep-ph/9910321]. [5] T. Ba nes, N. Black and P.R. Page, S ong decays o s ange qua konia,Phys. Re . D 68 (2003) 054014 [nucl- h/0208072]. [6] G. Gidal e al., Obse a ion o a spin 1 esonance in he eac ion γγ∗→K0K±πmp,Phys. Re . Le . 59 (1987) 2016. [7] TPC/Two Gamma collabo a ion, H. Aiha a e al., Fo ma ion o spin one mesons by pho on-pho on usion,Phys. Re . D 38 (1988) 1. [8] JADE collabo a ion, P. Hill e al., Obse a ion o spin 1 esonance o ma ion in he inal s a e KKπ p oduced in agged wo pho on collisions,Z. Physik C 42 (1989) 355. [9] CELLO collabo a ion, H.J. Beh end e al., K0 sKπ p oduc ion in agged and un agged γγ in e ac ions,Z. Physik C 42 (1989) 367. [10] CLEO collabo a ion, R. Ahohe e al., The sea ch o η1440 →K0 sK±π∓in wo-pho on usion a CLEO,Phys. Re . D 71 (2005) 072001 [hep-ex/0501026]. [11] L.D. Landau, The momen o a 2-pho on sys em,Dokl. Akad. Nauk. USSR 60 (1948) 207; C.N. Yang, Selec ion ules o he dema e ializa ion o a pa icle in o wo pho ons,Phys. Re . 77 (1950) 242. [12] G.A. Schule , F.A. Be ends and R. an Gulik, Meson pho on ansi ion o m ac o s and esonance c oss-sec ions in e+e−collisions,Nucl. Phys. B 523 (1998) 423 [hep-ph/9710462]. [13] G.P. Lepage and S.J. B odsky, Exclusi e p ocesses in pe u ba i e quan um ch omodynamics, Phys. Re . D 22 (1980) 2157; S.J. B odsky and G.P. Lepage, La ge angle wo pho on exclusi e channels in quan um ch omodynamics,Phys. Re . D 24 (1981) 1808. [14] L3 collabo a ion, P. Acha d e al., 1(1285) o ma ion in wo-pho on collisions a LEP,Phys. Le . B 526 (2002) 269. [15] R.N. Cahn, P oduc ion o spin 1 esonances in gamma gamma collisions,Phys. Re . D 35 (1987) 3342; C oss-sec ions o single agged wo pho on p oduc ion o esonances,Phys. Re . D 37 (1988) 833. – 16 – JHEP03(2007)018 [16] F.L. Linde, Cha m p oduc ion in wo-pho on collisions, Ph. D. Thesis, Rijksuni e si ei Leiden (1988). [17] R. an Gulik, GaGaRes: A Mon e Ca lo gene a o o esonance p oduc ion in wo-pho on physics,Nucl. Phys. 82 (P oc. Suppl.) (2000) 311; F.A. Be ends and R. an Gulik, GaGaRes: a Mon e Ca lo gene a o o esonance p oduc ion in wo-pho on physics,Compu . Phys. Commun. 144 (2002) 82 [hep-ph/0109195]. [18] V.M. Budne e al., The wo pho on pa icle p oduc ion mechanism. Physical p oblems. Applica ions. Equi alen pho on app oxima ion,Phys. Rep . 15 (1975) 181. [19] R. B un e al., GEANT 3.15 p ep in CERN DD/EE/84-1 (1984), e ised 1987. [20] H. Fese eld , RWTH Aachen epo PITHA 85/2 (1985). [21] P. B´en´e e al., Fi s -le el cha ged pa icle igge o he L3 de ec o ,Nucl. Ins um. Me h. A 306 (1991) 150. [22] D. Haas e al., The new inne -TEC igge o he L3 expe imen using a hadwi ed neu al ne wo k p ocesso ,Nucl. Ins um. Me h. A 420 (1999) 101. [23] F.E. Close and A. Ki k, Implica ions o he Glueball-q¯q il e on he 1++ none ,Z. Physik C 76 (1997) 469 [hep-ph/9706543]. – 17 –