scieee Open visual document viewer

Ways of taking random samples from a population for the needs of an economic indicators analysis

Gurinová, Kateřina

Abstract

Cílem příspěvku je poskytnout přehled možností, jak provádět náhodné výběry z populace České republiky, a jejich následné porovnání. Porovnání předložených metod bylo provedeno pomocí vybraných statistik, které umožňují zvolit metodu, jež přináší nejpřesnější odhady. Při závěrečných doporučeních však nesmíme zapomínat také na skutečnost, že při provádění náhodných výběrů v praxi jsme limitováni i finančními prostředky, pracovními silami, zabývajícími se šetřením, a dalšími faktory. Předkládáme tak v prvním případě řešení ideální a ve druhém optimální, a to s přihlédnutím ke všem ovlivňujícím faktorům.

Full text

53 WAYS OF TAKING RANDOM SAMPLES FROM A POPULATION FOR THE NEEDS OF AN ECONOMIC INDICATORS ANALYSIS Ka eřina Gu ino á *Vladimí a Ho o ko á Valen o á Technical Uni e si y o Libe ec Facul y o Economics S uden ská 2, 461 17, Libe ec 1, Czech Republic [email p o ec ed] * Technical Uni e si y o Libe ec Facul y o Economics S uden ská 2, 461 17, Libe ec 1, Czech Republic ladimi a. alen o [email protected] Abs ac The aim o his a icle is o p o ide a lis o possibili ies how o ake andom samples om he Czech Republic’s popula ion and, consequen ly, hei compa ison. The compa ison o he p esen ed me hods was ca ied ou wi h he help o selec ed s a is ic, which enables us o choose a me hod ha b ings in he mos accu a e es ima es. Howe e , we mus no o ge he ac ha when aking andom samples in p ac ise, we a e limi ed by inancial means, wo king o ce ha pa icipa es in he su ey, and o he ac o s. We a e, he e o e, p esen ing an ideal solu ion in he i s example and an op imal one in he second example while ha ing aken in o accoun all in luencing ac o s. In oduc ion This a icle was elabo a ed wi h he inancial help o he p ojec no. 1101 o he Fund o he De elopmen o Highe Educa ion Ins i u ions called C ea ion o a new module “S a is ical Da a Analysis o Ques ionnai es” and in connec ion wi h a p ojec egis e ed as WD-30-07-1 in he esea ch p og amme o he Minis y o Regional De elopmen . This p ojec called “Inno a ion App oach o Analysis o Dispa i ies on Regional Le el” has been ca ied ou a he Facul y o Economics, Technical Uni e si y o Libe ec du ing he yea s 2007- 2011. The ques ion how o ake he bes andom samples om a popula ion a ose while sol ing asks o he abo e men ioned p ojec , and du ing consul a ions wi h s uden s s udying a he Facul y o Economics, Technical Uni e si y o Libe ec (EF TUL). We ha e been ecen ly wo king, wi hin he ame o he p ojec WD-30-07-01, wi h he popula ion o he Czech Republic’s municipali ies, whe e alues o ce ain economic indica o s we e being elici ed. The aim o his a icle is o p o ide o he possible ways o aking andom samples o a ce ain numbe o municipali ies in he Czech Republic, which will be ins umen al in explo ing selec ed economic indica o s. This a icle is a ollow-up o he esea ch esul s published in [1]. New sugges ions o u he esea ch we e ecei ed a e publishing he a icle [1], and hese a e p esen ed in his a icle. 1 Theo e ical look a a andom sample Le us quickly ecapi ula e how a andom sample is de ined, and wha kinds o p obabili y samples we ha e. A sample is called andom when da a a e ob ained by andom sampling. 54 Randomness ensu es he ep esen a i ness o a sample and s a is ics ob ained by such a sample can be gene alized o a popula ion by he me hods o ma hema ical s a is ics. F om he p obabili y poin o iew, andom sampling can be implemen ed by equal o unequal p obabili ies. The simples kind o a andom sample is a simple andom sample - SRS. I is a di ec selec ion o elemen s om an unso ed popula ion. Each elemen , which is in he popula ion du ing his d aw, has, du ing each d aw, he same p obabili y o being d awn. We dis inguish be ween wo simple andom samples, namely a simple andom sample wi h eplacemen and a simple andom sample wi hou eplacemen . A sample wi h eplacemen has a pa e n o independen ials. The p obabili y ha each elemen will be chosen is he same o all d aws (1/N), and he size o he popula ion does no a y du ing he d aw. A sample wi hou eplacemen has a pa e n o dependen ials, he p obabili y ha each elemen will be chosen ises wi h each d aw. The size o he popula ion dec eases wi h each ollowing d aw. Howe e , SRS is o en unsui able due o i s simplici y. The e o e, o he mo e complex kinds o andom samples, which enable us o see he complica ed eali y be e , a e used. One o he mo e complica ed kinds o sampling is s a i ied sampling. The popula ion mus be i s ly subdi ided in o g oups o by o he name s a a. A co ec alloca ion o he popula ion in o s a a has a g ea impac on he sample quali y. S a a a e de ined as g oups o elemen s, which a e somehow simila ; i means ha he s a a a e mo e homogenous inside han he sample as a whole. As S. L. Loh says in [5], s a i ica ion is he mos e ec i e when means in s a a a y a lo . These g oups o elemen s can be bo h na u al and a i icial. A andom sample o a gi en numbe o elemen s is aken in each s a um. The mos common sample is p opo ional alloca ion, whe e sample sizes in each s a um a e in due p opo ion o he sizes o he s a a. Ye , a di e en app oach can be aken, such as aking he same, p e iously s a ed, numbe o elemen s om each s a um. In his case we call i uni o m sampling. Ano he op ion is op imal alloca ion o sampling in o s a a, i means ha sample sizes a e no only p opo ional o he sizes o s a a, bu u he mo e, hei a iabili y is also aken in o accoun . The d awback o his p ocedu e is i s ela i e complexness. S a i ied sampling is complex as i equi es ce ain p elimina y in o ma ion necessa y o assigning elemen s in o s a a. The nex d awback o s a i ied sampling is he ac ha is leads o a ela i ely la ge space a iance. All in all, i is mo e demanding su ey o ganisa ion and da a p ocessing wise, which o cou se inc eases he su ey expenses. The ad an age, in compa ison o SRS, is he ac ha s a i ied sampling inc eases e iciency o es ima o s. Clus e sampling is conside ed as a mo e complica ed kind o a andom sample. I s simples ype is wo-s age clus e sampling, ye , he p ocedu e can be gene alized in o mo e s ages. A popula ion mus be di ided in o g oups. G oups o uni s, called p ima y uni s, a e andomly aken om he popula ion du ing he i s s age. Then, du ing he second s age, s a is ic uni s, called seconda y uni s, a e andomly selec ed om he p ima y uni s. The ad an age o such a kind o sampling, compa ed o s a i ied sampling, is he ac ha space a iance o he selec ed uni s is signi ican ly smalle , which leads o a educ ion o he su ey cos s. The disad an age is ha i b ings in less eliable easons wi hin he same sample size han he simple andom sampling o s a i ied sampling. I is due o he ac ha some p ima y uni s a e en i ely le ou du ing his p ocedu e; he e o e, he e is no in o ma ion abou hem a ailable. Clus e sampling equi es e y p ecise p epa a ion, and i s p ocessing by ma hema ical-s a is ical me hods is mo e complex. 55 2 Summa y o ob ained esul s The aim o he p e ious ac i i ies was o apply di e en kinds o andom samples o speci ic da a and o ca y ou a compa ison o he ob ained samples in e ms o hei ep esen a i ness. The popula ion we wo ked wi h consis ed o 6,248 Czech municipali ies. The esea ched economic indica o was unemploymen a e in %, in he yea 2006. The Czech S a is ical O ice (CSO) supplied he da a abou his indica o in all Czech municipali ies. The sample size was es ima ed as 520 uni s. Such a size is big enough o allow us o gene alize he esul s, and, in addi ion, i allowed us o ca y ou sys ema ic sampling. We ook 30 andom samples om he gi en popula ion. They ep esen ed 10 SRSs, sys ema ic sampling was used in 5 cases, and o he 5 samples we e ob ained by a andom numbe gene a o , which was un in he s a is ic so wa e STATGRAPHICS CENTURION XVI. O he 15 samples we e ob ained by s a i ied sampling (uni o m, p opo ional, and op imal alloca ion); he las 5 samples we e aken by wo-s age sampling. We used se e al c i e ia o compa e he quali y o ou es ima es ob ained by di e en kinds o andom samples:  S anda d e o o he mean  Mean de ia ion  Rela i e gains om s a i ica ion I is well known ha when a eal alue is eplaced by an es ima e ob ained by sampling, so called sampling e o occu s . I is impossible o de ine i in a eal si ua ion; we can only specula e abou some o i s alloca ion cha ac e is ics. The e o e, measu es o s a is ic a ia ion a e used o measu e he quali y o an es ima e, he mos common is he mean squa ed e o - page 28, in [4]:       . 2 2 b D E (1) This measu emen measu es he e o o poin es ima ion. In he case ha he sample cha ac e is ic is an unbiased es ima o o he popula ion cha ac e is ic, he mean squa e e o equals a iance. A s anda d de ia ion, hus a posi i e squa e oo o , is some imes called a s anda d e o o he mean, and i enables us o examine he accu acy o an unbiased es ima o . Based on he in o ma ion s a ed abo e, a sample a e age s anda d de ia ion can be de ined as ollows:  . n yD   (2) This cha ac e is ic canno usually be de ined p ecisely in p ac ise as we do no know he popula ion a iance. The e o e, i is impo an o eplace he unknown alue by i s poin es ima ion , and we ge :  . n s yDodh y  (3) Since we we e wo king wi h a popula ion, and he cha ac e is ics o he popula ion we e a ailable, we could calcula e he s anda d e o o he mean di ec ly. Table 1 shows selec ed cha ac e is ics o he popula ion, which we e calcula ed wi hin he ame o he p e ious ac i i ies desc ibed in [1]. 56 Tab. 1 Selec ed cha ac e is ics o he popula ion (own calcula ions) Popula ion    yD 9.20197 5.574498 0.244458 Tha , apa om o he hings, allowed us o compa e his measu emen wi h i s es ima o s ob ained by pa icula samples. Tables 2, 3, 4 show an o e iew o he ob ained esul s and selec ed cha ac e is ics o he sample desc ibed in [1]. Tab. 2 Selec ed cha ac e is ics o he simple andom sample (own calcula ions) Sample SRS – sys ema ic SRS – wi h help o andom numbe s i y i s   yDodh i y i s   yDodh Sample 1 9.15269 5.43582 0.238376 9.22019 5.70719 0.250277 Sample 2 9.06769 5.50411 0.241371 9.10981 5.54754 0.243276 Sample 3 9.13635 4.96938 0.217922 9.12923 5.19733 0.227918 Sample 4 9.14038 5.73322 0.251418 9.17962 5.73837 0.251644 Sample 5 9.78346 6.42324 0.281678 9.24788 5.51413 0.241810 Tab. 3 Selec ed cha ac e is ics o uni o m and p opo ional alloca ion (own calcula ions) Sample Uni o m alloca ion P opo ional alloca ion i y i s   yDodh i y i s   yDodh Sample 1 9.79962 5.75534 0.220511 8.88192 5.10039 0.192955 Sample 2 9.52788 5.40658 0.229614 9.53596 6.30391 0.235050 Sample 3 9.93827 6.02183 0.235961 9.22327 5.17975 0.198103 Sample 4 9.93871 5.98349 0.248117 9.12923 5.32163 0.202882 Sample 5 9.67692 5.64627 0.220972 8. 69404 4.90830 0.186032 Tab. 4 Selec ed cha ac e is ics o op imal alloca ion and wo-s age clus e sampling (own calcula ions) Sample Op imal alloca ion Two- s age clus e sampling i y i s   yDodh i y i s   yDodh Sample 1 9.65962 5.29517 0.186848 9.40365 5.85226 1.040275 Sample 2 9.49462 6.26057 0.206682 9.46577 5.74643 0.937844 Sample 3 9.46154 5.71500 0.204395 10.5004 6.18511 1.496538 Sample 4 9.24250 5.29480 0.198942 9.40192 5.70257 1.048770 Sample 5 9.73115 5.79131 0.206195 8.52788 4.65322 1.346991 As Tables 2, 3, and 4 show, he esul s ob ained by he simple andom sample wi h he help o andom numbe s come he closes o he ac ual s anda d e o o he mean. The second closes esul is om he sys ema ic sampling, ollowed by uni o m alloca ion, hen p opo ional alloca ion, and hen he op imal alloca ion. The wo s age clus e sampling di e ed signi ican ly. Ano he c i e ion used o compa e he aken samples was he mean de ia ion o each sample mean om he ac ual mean o he popula ion. The mean de ia ion is calcula ed as ollows: 57 Mean de ia ion  , 2 1 k y k i i      (4) whe e i y a e indi idual sample means and k is a numbe o samples. Table 5, which is also a esul o he ac i i ies published in [1], shows a compa ison o h ee kinds o andom sampling. Tab. 5 Compa ison o di e en kinds o andom sampling wi h he help o mean de ia ion. (own calcula ions) Cha ac e is ic SRS S a i ied sampling wo-s age clus e sys ema ic andom numbe s p opo ional uni o m op imal Mean de ia ion 0.2708 0.0578 0.3091 0.6011 0.3589 0.6768 The esul s p esen ed in Table 5 show ha he simple andom sample wi h he help o andom numbe s accoun s o he bes alues. The a e age di e ence o sample means om he ac ual mean is only 0.0578, he second bes is he sys ema ic simple andom sample wi h i s alue 0.2708. The wo-s age clus e sampling demons a ed he bigges di e ence 0.6768. The uni o m alloca ion o s a i ied sampling shows he second wo s esul , whe e he mean de ia ion is 0.6011. Ano he c i e ion used o compa e he gi en samples was hei ela i e gains om s a i ica ion, which S.L. men ions in [page 77, 5]. I is weighing up he a iance o s a i ied sampling and he a iance o a simple andom sample o he same size. Mo e signi ican ela i e gains om he s a i ica ion was no iced only in wo cases, namely when compa ing p opo ional alloca ion o s a i ied sampling wi h he sys ema ic simple andom sample (0.9025) and he simple andom sample wi h he help o andom numbe s (0.9434). 3 A new pe spec i e on s a i ied sampling A e publishing he abo e esul s o ou esea ch, we we e conce ned wi h co ec de ining s a a in s a i ied sampling. As s a ed he einbe o e, he quali y o he esul s ob ained based on he s a i ied sampling is con ingen on he co ec de ini ion o s a a. The egions o he Czech Republic we e conside ed as s a a in ou las esea ch, i means ha we ollowed he o mal o ganiza ion. As he esul s demons a e in [1], egions a e no exac ly ideal g oups. The a iabili y wi hin hem is ela i ely high and hey do no di e a lo among hemsel es. Now, we ocused on he ac how di e en ly s a a o s a i ied sampling can be de ined, so ha he ob ained esul s would be mo e sa is ying han in he p e ious case. We ook in conside a ion he ac ha unemploymen a e can be di e en in di e en ly-sized municipali ies, he e o e we made a decision ha a new g ouping c i e ion will be he size o a municipali y gi en by he numbe o inhabi an s. We bo owed he ca ego iza ion om he Czech S a is ic O ice – see e.g. [8], whe e we di e en ia e he ollowing g oups:  municipali ies up o 199 inhabi an s;  municipali ies wi h 200 – 499 inhabi an s;  municipali ies wi h 500 – 999 inhabi an s;  municipali ies wi h 1,000 – 1,999 inhabi an s;  municipali ies wi h 2,000 – 4,999 inhabi an s; 58  municipali ies wi h 5,000 – 9,999 inhabi an s;  municipali ies wi h 10,000 – 19,999 inhabi an s;  municipali ies wi h 20,000 – 49,999 inhabi an s;  municipali ies wi h 50,000 – 99,999 inhabi an s;  municipali ies wi h 100,000 inhabi an s and mo e. Table 6 shows he numbe o municipali ies in he Czech Republic, in each ca ego y. Tab. 6 Numbe o municipali ies in each size ca ego y acco ding o he numbe o inhabi an s ( he CZSO and own calcula ions) Ca ego y Up o199 200-499 500- 999 1,000 – 1,999 2,000 – 4,999 5,000 – 9,999 10,000 – 19,999 20,000 – 49,999 50,000 – 99,999 abo e 100,000 Numbe o municipali ies 1 608 2 012 1 304 678 376 138 69 42 16 5 We did no see uni o m sp eading o he s a i ied sampling meaning ul due o he numbe o municipali ies in each ca ego y. The e o e, we ca ied ou only p opo ional and op imal alloca ion o s a i ied sampling – 5 samples om each kind. Fi s ly, we c ea ed 5 p opo ional samples. The sample size in each s a um was de ined acco ding o (see page 17, [13]): , N N nn h h (5) whe e h n is a sample size in h s a um, n is a o al sample size, h N is a h-s a um size, N is a popula ion size. Table 7 shows he numbe o municipali ies selec ed in each ca ego y, based on he numbe o inhabi an s. Tab. 7 Numbe o municipali ies in he sampling in each size ca ego y acco ding o he numbe o inhabi an s a p opo ional alloca ion ( he CZSO and own calcula ions) Ca ego y Up o 199 200 -499 500 -999 1, 000 – 1, 999 2, 000 – 4, 999 5, 000 – 9, 999 10, 000 – 19, 999 20, 000 – 49, 999 50, 000 – 99, 999 abo e 100, 000 Numbe o municipali ies 134 167 109 56 31 12 6 4 1 0 As we can see, he las ca ego y, municipali ies wi h mo e han 100,000 inhabi an s, was no ep esen ed in he sample. We p esume ha his ac could cause less accu a e esul s han i all he ca ego ies we e included in he sample. Table 8 shows he calcula ed selec ed cha ac e is ics om all 5 samples. 59 Tab. 8 Selec ed cha ac e is ics o p opo ional and op imal alloca ion (own calcula ions) Sample P opo ional alloca ion Op imal alloca ion i y i s   yDodh i y i s   yDodh Sample 1 9.25510 4.98647 0.208174 9.17675 5.12996 0.205640 Sample 2 9.23478 5.30185 0.221910 9.10845 5.78815 0.230998 Sample 3 9.88580 5.88114 0.246896 9.64418 5.81105 0.244301 Sample 4 8.90485 5.55757 0.233371 9.16308 5.52874 0.225410 Sample 5 9.41249 5.66548 0.236503 9.38354 5.86010 0.232929 S anda d e o o es ima ed mean in s a um h is calcula ed acco ding o (p esen ed in e. g. [3]): , 1 )( 2 2 2         L h hh h hsN n N N yDodh (6) whe e N is a popula ion size, h N is he popula ion o al in s a um h, h n is he sample size in s a um h, 2 h s is an es ima o o he popula ion a iance in s a um h ( o sampling wi h and wi hou eplacemen ). The es ima o o he popula ion a iance in s a um h 2 h s is de ined as:  , 2 2 h n k hhk hn yy s h   (7) whe e hk y is a alue o k- h uni in s a um h and h y is an es ima o o he popula ion mean in s a um h. A e p opo ional alloca ion o s a i ied sampling, we ca ied ou op imal alloca ion. The op imal sample size in s a um h ( o sampling wi hou eplacemen ) is de e mined by he ela ion p esen ed in e. g. [3]: ,    hh hh hSN SN nn (8) whe e h N is he popula ion o al in s a um h, h n is he sample size in s a um h, h S is he popula ion s anda d de ia ion in s a um h. The s anda d de ia ion h S is calcula ed acco ding o he o mula: 60  , 1 2    h N k hhk hN YY S h (9) whe e hk Y is a alue o k- h uni in he popula ion, h N is he popula ion o al in s a um h, h Y is he popula ion mean in s a um h. We calcula ed selec ed cha ac e is ics on a base o i e andom samples – hey a e also p esen ed in Table 8. Focusing on he compa ison o hese samples, we ha e o supplemen commen s wi h he calcula ions o he a e age de ia ion o sample means om he popula ion mean. Table 9 con ains ou calcula ions. Tab. 9 Compa ison o p opo ional and op imal alloca ion o s a i ied sample wi h he help o he a e age de ia ion (own calcula ion) Cha ac e is ic S a i ied sampling P opo ional alloca ion Op imal alloca ion A e age de ia ion 0.3476 0.2190 The esul s in he p e ious ables show ha s anda d e o s a e smalle in he case o op imal alloca ion o s a i ied sampling bu he di e ences a e no so signi ican . I we compa e he new samples wi h he p e ious ones (p esen ed in [1]), i is e iden ha new alloca ion o s a a does no b ing any bene i because he s anda d e o s a e g ea e han in he case when he s a a we e de ined as egions o he Czech Republic. Le us look a he alues o a e age de ia ions. The a e age de ia ion is conside ably smalle in he case o op imal alloca ion o s a i ied sampling in compa ison o p opo ional alloca ion. We can also no ice by he compa ison o he new esul s wi h he esul s om he p e ious esea ch (see Table 5) ha he a e age de ia ion o op imal alloca ion is signi ican ly smalle in compa ison o he s a i ied sampling when he s a a we e de ined as egions o he Czech Republic. We can e en egis e ha i is he second bes esul ( he bes is SRS using he andom numbe gene a o ). The alue o his cha ac e is ic is now wo se o p opo ional alloca ion o s a i ied sampling han in he p e ious esea ch. We omi he compa ison wi h he help o he ela i e gain om s a i ica ion because i does no b ing signi ican bene i s which would make he decision on a kind o sampling easie . Conclusion The calcula ions and compa isons o he a ious kinds o sampling men ioned abo e indica e ha nei he s a i ied sampling no wo-s age clus e sampling imp o e he quali y o es ima es. The a e age de ia ion shows ha he es ima ions ob ained by SRS do no di e om he popula ion cha ac e is ics as much as he es ima es ob ained om o he kinds o samplings. We achie ed a ce ain imp o emen in he quali y o es ima ions, wi h espec o his c i e ion o he compa ison, by changing he de ini ion o s a a om he “ egions o he Czech Republic“ o he “municipal size ca ego ies“. Howe e , we did no ge as a signi ican imp o emen o he es ima ions quali y by changing he s a a de ini ion as we had expec ed. 61 The eason can be unemploymen a e blindness in ela ion o he numbe o inhabi an s, o la ge a iabili y o alues wi hin he s a a, and small a iabili y among hem. So, we assume ha municipal size ca ego ies a e no a sui able so ing c i e ion ei he . In conclusion, le us add ha i is necessa y o ake in o conside a ion he ac ha we a e limi ed by many a ious ac o s when ca ying ou sampling in p ac ise. Fi s ly, i is he a ailabili y o da a, which a e no o en in such a s uc u e ha can be subdi ided in o sui able subg oups. Fu he mo e, he e is he means, which makes us minimize he su ey cos s. I is necessa y o ha monize all hese equi emen s and choose a sui able comp omise. E en hough i is e iden ha he bes way o aking andom samples om a popula ion would be simple andom sampling in ela ion o he es ima ions quali y, i s inancial and o ganiza ional demandingness makes us use some o he mo e complex kinds o sampling. Two-s age clus e sampling is e y o en he mos common solu ion in p ac ise. I allows us o educe su ey cos s bu he e iciency o es ima o s is small. We ha e he e p esen ed he cha ac e is ics and esul s o wo-s age clus e sampling wi h equal p obabili ies only. We could ha e ob ained mo e e icien es ima o s i we had ca ied ou sampling wi h unequal p obabili ies. This idea can be an impulse o he nex esea ch. Li e a u e [1] GURINOVÁ, K.; HOVORKOVÁ VALENTOVÁ, V. Možnos i p o edení náhodných ýbě ů z populace ČR za účelem zkoumání ý oje hospodářských ukaza elů. In VII. očník meziná odní kon e ence apliko ané s a is iky Fe nS a _CZ 2010. Ús í nad Labem 23. – 24. 9. 2010. Sbo ník příspě ků. Ús í nad Labem: UJEP, FSE, 2010 – no p in ed ye . [2] ČERMÁK, V.; VRABEC, M. Teo ie ýbě o ých še ření. Čás 1. 1. ydání. Vysoká škola ekonomická P aze, P aha, 1999. ISBN 80-7079-191-8. [3] ČERMÁK, V.; VRABEC, M. Teo ie ýbě o ých še ření. Čás 3. 1. ydání. Vysoká škola ekonomická P aze, P aha 1999. ISBN 80-245-0003-5. [4] KAHOUNOVÁ, J. P ak ikum k ýuce ma ema ické s a is iky I. Odhady. 1. ydání. Vysoká škola ekonomická P aze, P aha, 2000. ISBN 80-245-0070-1. [5] LOHR, L. S. Sampling: Desing and Analysis. 2. ydání. B ooks/Cole, Bos on (USA) 2010. ISBN 978-0-495-11084-2. [6] PACÁKOVÁ, V. a kol. Š a is ické me ódy p e ekonómo . P é ydanie. Iu a Edi ion, B a isla a, 2009. ISBN 978-80-8078-284-9. [7] PECÁKOVÁ, I; NOVÁK, I.; HERZMANN, J. Pořizo ání a yhodnoco ání da e ýzkumech eřejného mínění. Vysoká škola ekonomická P aze, P aha, 2000. ISBN 80- 7079-357-0. [8] Český s a is ický úřad: Tab. 2.3.1 P ůmě ná oby ná plocha / m2/ na 1 by podle poč u oby ných mís nos í a podle elikos ní ka ego ie obce k 1. 3. 2001 [online]. P aha, Český s a is ický úřad, [ci . 2010-10-14]. A ailable om WWW: <www.czso.cz/csu/2005edicniplan.ns /p/4131-05> __________________________________________________________________________ Ing. Ka eřina Gu ino á, Ph.D. Ing. Vladimí a Ho o ko á Valen o á, Ph.D.