Reversion toward the mean of corporate revenues' growth – a sectoral perspective
Abstract
Charakteristické znamení finanční výkonnosti podniků je dlouhodobé navrácení těchto výsledků na úroveň průměru za celou ekonomiku. V případě příjmu, to znamená, že firmy v daném období, které vykazují nad průměr vyšší (nižší) dynamiku, v následujících obdobích ukazují tendenci k poklesu (nárůstu) v této dynamice. Článek se zabývá fenoménem návratu k průměru v případě sektorové dynamiky příjmů v Polsku v letech 2006-2008. Výzkum ukázal, že relativní dynamika příjmu jednolitvých sektorů, má tendenci navrácení se k průměru.
Full text
q :w4°H
– A SECTORAL PERSPECTI
113
q :w4°
– A SECTORAL PERSPECTI
+`,.6
S_(>(_^_
^(E?#Y((
|E?#
ul. Nowowiejska 3, 58-500 Jelenia Gó a, Polska
[email p o ec ed] oc.pl
Abs ac
;**_***HHH##
he long-"H*#_*#"#"?H*_*#(&W
*H"**es which ?"*_"-"?
"?_**H##_?²*(*_#_H*
g ow h and companies which ?"*_#_-"?"?_**
H##_?²*(*_HH?_*&This pape p esen s he
* H " _ * * H " ?_* H "#
indus ies in Poland in *H 2006-$$&Y**H**#""
g ow h wi hi*"#*_*(H"_*&
`8#F68%
U?"?_*##H#
HH##("#R(R?|#_%%¡¥I$$¥
VI*#$$®&"*"?_*H"#?#(
*H?_*H*(_***?"
?_* * _*# ( "#? * ?_* " H *
#??*(I#X#(}$$®&;**_
***HHH##@(&?&"?_*
H#(&C#?-"H*#_*(-_"?
#"# U U* %%%¥ X_? |# * $$¡¥ } V $$$¥ R
$$ ®&W*H"****?"
*_ "-"? @"-"?C " ?_* * H##_? ² *
(*_#_@HCH*?_*&W#(#**H#
# H ## "# ² #?- " _ * (-wide
"?& Y* ²# * * H " _ * * H
" ?_*H"#I#$$-$$@*H#
?_*H*>SC&
q :w4°
– A SECTORAL PERSPECTI
114
`@,&)).%ed analy ical p ocedu e
W***?#"HPolish companies we e used. The
#(_*#?*"?_*H %$$-2008.
These da a a e shown in Table 1.
Table 1: To al e"?_*HPolish indus ies in 2006-$$(&
W( E"?_*Î W( E"?_*Î
2006 2007 2008 2006 2007 2008
R?H##?¥
²H $% 1,00 1,22
RHH
medical, p ecision and
op ical ins umen s,
wa ches and clocks
1,22 1,18 1,17
{*?´(? 1,10 1,27 1,16
RHH
"*##
semi- aile s
1,17 1,14 1,06
RHHH
"? 1,07 1,15 1,05 RHH*
´ 1,06 1,06 1,08
RHH
p oduc s 1,06 1,18 0,72 RHH
H 1,10 1,11 $%
RHH²# 1,04 1,10 $%¡ E(#? % 1,24 1,11
RHH_?
#H( 1,12 $%% $%¡ >#(?
and *_#( 1,08 1,01 1,21
RHH#*
lea he p oduc s 1,15 1,18 $%
B##H
H
wa e
1,08 1,02 $%
RHH_
wood, s aw and wicke
p oduc s
1,07 1,23 $% B 1,21 1,31 1,15
RHH#
pape 1,04 1,13 1,04
Sale, main enance and
H"*#
(#¥#
H"H#
1,14 1,22 1,06
Publishing, p in ing, and
H
media
1,06 1,06 1,02 Wholesale and
commission ade 1,17 1,12 1,12
RHH
H# 1,27 1,18 1,28
E#¥H
pe sonal and household
goods
1,13 1,23 1,18
RHH*#
and chemical p oduc s 1,12 1,04 1,02 Ho els and es au an s 1,16 % 1,11
ManuHH
plas ic p oduc s % % 1,06 Land anspo ;
"# 1,14 1,12 1,06
RHH*-
me allic mine al p oduc s 1,17 1,23 1,07
;²#(
"¥
o ganiza ion
1,18 1,18 1,22
RH H
ma e ials % 1,14 $%% Pos and
elecommunica ions 1,03 1,06 1,07
RHH#
p oduc s 1,22 1,25 1,08
E#?
" 1,11 1,24 %
RHH*(
´ 1,13 1,26 1,17 > 1,20 1,32 1,26
RHHHH
*( $% 1,46 1,84 Heal h and social wo k 1,20 1,25 1,43
RHH##
*( % 1,15 $%
{*(
social and pe sonal
""
1,06 1,23 1,36
q :w4°H
– A SECTORAL PERSPECTI
115
RHH
#"
´
and appa a us
1,16 $%% 1,10
Î"(¹
B##{HH¥*##&
Y*#"?_"_-#&Y*H
he pe iod be ween 2006-2007 and he second one emb aced 2007-$$&W*H*-
#_#(*"_*H*"?_*&W*
H * H -# ## % _ H ? "
?_* $$ @H * ( _* * *?* ?_* * ( _* * #_
?_*C& Y* * _ " # * * H #
$¸ H _* * H " ?_* $06 and he las decile
$¸H_**#_"?_*$$&}#
H " " ´##( # _ * H
"*##@ "C&U*H*#
*_(*"?_*$$_&Y**"
?_* * H##_? ( _ H * #& Y* H
"?_*@#C_#("?**?"#
(*##*&A#?_H*-
# @? $$-$$C& Y* # H " ?_*
#"#H*"_*H*"?_*&
`@,,(F.8(
B***H"_**H"
?_*H$$-2008. The cha s*_*"?H#H
"?_*&U²#*"#H*H#Y@_*Y*(H
_***#H##*C**"?H_
"#H#H*H#*H(H*-samples.
;#?#(*"#H*H#YÐ@_*YÐ*(H##_?*
(H_***#H##*C**"?H
he _"#H#H*H#*(H*
sub-samples. As i can be seen in he cha , he 2006-2008 pe iod was * ( a
?H"_*H"?_*HPolish indus ies. In he pe iods
unde "? * # H " ?_* * H # "?
& Y* ** " ?_* *H # ² *
"?_*?##*(¸&Y*#?"#H he en h
#"?$¡&Y* ** "?_*** #_
#_**"?_*?##*(¡¸&X_"*
HH**H##_?(&Y*ce be ween he highes and he
#_ "# H # * ( Y "? ? *
H##_? ( # $ ? & Y* " H * #
"?_**?#?#H?&Y*_*
*?**#_"#H# ha (Y"?
?*H##_?(#$?&X_"*#
no iced ha despi e * # " _ * ( YÐ * #"
" ?_* * H # * "-"? #"# * #"
q :w4°
– A SECTORAL PERSPECTI
116
" ?_* * # # #_-"? #"#& Y*H * #
"**(&
B*)#"?_*Î#HPolish indus ies in 2006-
2008.
1,06
1,12
$%
0,85
0,80
$%$
1,00
1,10
TYÐ
Pe iod
)#H"É?_*
#H
Decile 1** Decile 2 Decile 3 Decile 4
Decile 5 Decile 6 Decile 7 Decile 8
V#% Decile 10***
Î#H"?_*_*H"
?_*?"# *"?_*?##**
pe iod
ÎÎ$¸H_***?*"?_*(Y
ÎÎÎ$¸H_**#_"?_*(Y
IY*(H_***#H ##*YÐ*
(H##_?*(H_***#H##*&
B##{HH¥*##&
Y*"#*_**"_*_"
?_* H Polish indus ies in 2006-$$& W * H ( ( (
²"-"?@#_-"?C"?_**#""?_*
##(#@C*H##_?(_he all- he-"?&"*
H**#"_**(*#(H*
H*"_&Y*HY#*#
"?_**H (H*-#@&&**
H"?*?"-##C&Y*##H*#@*C
**"?H*#@H*-#C&W o de
"#*H"_*_@H*#*-
#C*H#*(*#*
H(&Y**_*HY#&
In *#(-#*"?_*H?*H
#²*"?_*H##*(¸&X_"
#(H(*#"?_**# (*
"?H¡¸@*#*_"**H??H*-
#C& Y* * H h % h and 10 h deciles. The median
"?_*H? he 10 h decile "?¡¸H"
?_*H##*&X_"*H##_?(*?H"_*
q :w4°H
– A SECTORAL PERSPECTI
117
@#"?_**##("?H
¸C&
Table 2: No malized medians H"?_*Î(Y**?H*
(YÐ&
V#H
indus ies
Sub-sample ;*"?
in bo h
sub-samples
2006-2007 2007-2008
No malized medians
H"?_*Y
Decile 1** 1,13 1,11 1,12
Decile 2 1,07 1,06 1,06
Decile 3 1,05 1,04 1,05
Decile 4 1,03 1,02 1,03
Decile 5 1,01 1,00 1,01
Decile 6 $%% $% $%
Decile 7 $% $%¡ $%
Decile 8 $% $% $%
V#% $% 0,87 $%$
Decile 10*** 0,85 0,84 0,85
The changes in no malized medians
H"?_*YÐÎÎÎÎ
Decile 1** 0,88 1,01 $%¡
Decile 2 1,01 1,00 1,01
Decile 3 $% 1,05 1,00
Decile 4 $% $% $%¡
Decile 5 1,01 1,00 1,00
Decile 6 $% $% $%
Decile 7 $% 1,03 $%
Decile 8 1,07 1,01 1,04
Decil% 1,01 1,15 1,08
Decile 10*** 1,05 1,21 1,13
Î#H"?_*_*H"
?_*?"#*"?_*?##**
pe iod
ÎÎ$¸H_***?*"?_*(Y
ÎÎÎ$¸H_**#_"?_*(Y
ÎÎÎÎ#"?_*?"#(YÐ"(#
"?_**#(Y
B##{HH¥*##&
VH*##HY## he ´HH*H"
_*&B**#*_*"?@*H(H
bo h sub-samp#C"#H"?_*"##**?H
* # ? * H##_? (& W * #( * _
´a ?H?"#*_*#""? ow h in
Y#@YÐC*?H*#"?_*&W_**"-
"? @#_-"?C " ?_* ?" ( ² *
@CH*?_*_##- he-"?*H##_?(&
q :w4°
– A SECTORAL PERSPECTI
118
B*Y*#*_*#H"?_*#H
(Y**?H*?_**#(YÐ&
" «««
±«
R
2
«
$%$
$%¡
1,00
1,05
1,10
1,15
0,80 0,85 $%$ $%¡ 1,00 1,05 1,10 1,15
;"?#H"É?_*#H
*HH*#(#
;"?H#H
*"É?_***
HH*#Î
ÎH*#(YÐ*#(Y
B##{HH¥*##&
B* Y-(""H#"?_*ÎHPolish indus ies
#*H#?-linea eg ession.
0,80
$%$
1,00
1,10
T YÐ YÐ YÐ YÐ YС YÐ YÐ YÐ YÐ%
Pe iod**
)#"É?_*
indus ies*
Î*H"?_*?"("?_*H##
ÎÎ(#(@Y*(YÐ H##_?(C
B##{HH¥*##&
The log-# ? *_ B* #d he # H * #"
" ?_* H -( H& Y* ? # he
##H*²H²-("_*H*#"#
H # " ?_*& E## @ * H * ?
q :w4°H
– A SECTORAL PERSPECTI
%
HHC H * H* ( @H ( YÐC ? #?- e m
"-"@**##*(*?HH#C&
B* * #H*"H#"?_*#H he
#"#@*_*"#HH*#*_*##
HY#C&Y***_*?*??"H
"?_*H_**""?-¡(
I#@***?HH#C&W_*"-
"?@#_-"?C"?_*?"( *_#_@*?*C#"
" ?_* * H##_? (& Y* #"-"?@#_-"?C H
"?_**H##_?((##(*##- he-"?
#"#&X_"?*s ima ed log-#?*"?
abou 4-¡(&
`6.F(%(
The esea ch p esen ed * @ ? " ?_* H
Polish indus ies in 2006-$$CH**#""?_*Hindus ies ends o
" _ * & W * #( # H % * ?H ?"
#*_*#"@&&#*"?H##*C"
?_*?"(**?H*#"?_**²(_&W
**("-"?@#_-"?C"?_*(
(##(²?H@CH*?_*_*(-wide
#"#*H##_?(&X_"?**H#
"*-¡(&
EH
[1] Bajaj M., Denis D. J., Sa in A.: ZO!!z©Z&
in Co po a e Valua ion. J#H;#U&'#&&B*?$$&
[2] DePamphilis D. M.: Z-[!WO[( Academic
I;"U&$$&
®U>&U&U*|&E&Fo ecas ing P o i abili y and Ea nings. BHE*
(I^?I&B*?%%%&
[4] Hwang M., Keil M., Smi h G.: ] ! N !(
;#U#>&'#&&$$&
¡®R(E&B&R?O&E&|#_^&O&Con empo a y Financial Managemen . Wes
I#*?B(&&I#%%¡&
[6] Mu s ein B. I.: O!!ZBW!zZ!$X&!)!&
in he S ock Ma ke . Y*O#H}*"#U&'#&&O(B($$ &
[7] Palep|&&X#(I&R&}'&&N[ª!|
S a emen s. Thomson Sou h-Wes e n. Mason 2004.
[8] Penman S. H.: Financial S a emen Analysis and Secu i y Valua ion. McG aw-Hill. New
~$$&
V&$&$$%
E" $&&$$%
*"##"&&$$%
q :w4°
– A SECTORAL PERSPECTI
120
q q: q ::
: : q – w
NACH SEKTOREN
B** H¯ H## O*? " Un e nehmen is eine
#?H?|"?>?**#*)"H¯?
^*H&WU##>À?S*
q¯**#***@?CV(?ÀI
Y R? @q*C H?& W E* _*H#* ;
* I*À E¯* R#_ U###V(
>À? I# q $$-2008 *& V ? #"
V(>À?#YE¯*R#_
H?&
+ q ¢q+ q: 4q;
4q – +
B* *(( _(_ H_(* _ ?_
_ (* _(_ _ (* # ?& ^ (
(*_ _ _( _ (
_(@C*(_*#(*_(@_C
(& ^ (# _ _ ` _ ( _
((*__ I#_#*$$-$$&I_ _(
#(_ ( (*_ ?#(* _ _( _
`&
4:²4hz4q²q:4hz+:4qz
– 4hz4
B*< H"!F#*<" +*
"!#F["±F+#&'=+=9H("
< <"(F+"(44 @94C( "#**
#@FC"<(&#!"H<"
F+"=+"<((=F"I#"#*$$-$$&'!#
9 #" ( = #"!* F " F+&