scieee Open visual document viewer

Deflation and output across sectors: results for the Czech Republic

Ryska, Pavel

Abstract

The present paper looks into the relationship between deflation and economic output. Previous studies relied uniquely on annual macroeconomic data on GDP and prices, which caused lack of observations on deflation. This paper uses panel data on 86 sectors of the Czech economy in 1993-2015, which offer more variation in price changes and display frequent observations of deflation. Our goal is to test the hypothesis whether deflation negatively affects output growth – as is commonly thought – and whether central banks should counter all deflation that appears. The most common argument against deflation is that decreasing prices lead consumers and firms to postpone purchases, which in turn depresses output. We find that (1) sectors with output price deflation and below-average inflation have higher growth rate of output, and that (2) these sectors also tend to show quicker growth in gross value added. This evidence contradicts the often held notion that deflation is linked with recession or subpar growth. It also shows that firms with deflating output prices do not have trouble preserving their profits. Deflation observed in the Czech economy in 1993-2015 is likely to be the result of falling unit costs enabled by firms’ investment rather than the result of falling demand. This might have policy implications. Our results highlight that monetary policy should differentiate among sources of deflation and that deflation observed in the Czech Republic has been rather of the 'good' type. We believe that our approach using sector data is novel because it uncovers more variation in prices and output than the more common approach that uses macroeconomic aggregates.

Full text

94 2018, XXI, 4 Ekonomie DOI: 10.15240/ ul/001/2018-4-007 In oduc ion The s udy o de l a ion seems o be gaining e e mo e impo ance. Cen al banks in mos ad anced economies, including he Eu opean Cen al Bank and he Czech Na ional Bank, ha e obse ed CPI in l a ion unning below hei a ge s o e en in ou igh de l a iona y e i o y. These cen al banks a gue ha de l a ion should be a oided a all cos s and employ ex ao dina y policies such as quan i a i e easing, o eign exchange in e en ions o nega i e nominal in e es a es o i gh agains i . As hese policies ha e no always led o highe economic g ow h and highe in l a ion, he e ha e been calls o e en mo e ex ao dina y measu es. Among hose is a p oposal o abolish cash money in o de o allow banks o ca y o e he nega i e in e es a es mo e e i cien ly on hei deposi o s and s oke in l a ion (see e.g. Bui e , (2009) o Rogo (2014)). The e o e, a lo is a s ake in knowing whe he de l a ion (especially mild de l a ion) should be a oided by all means. The e a e subs an ial p oblems wi h s udies ha ha e ied o assess he ela ionship be ween economic g ow h and he p ice le el. Fi s , all o hem ha e used agg ega e da a o coun ies such as GDP and CPI. While agg ega e a iables p o ide in o ma ion abou he economy as a whole, hey canno e eal he po en ial a ia ion in ou pu and p ices ha akes place ‘inside’ he economy. As a esul , we know e y li le abou whe he i ms and sec o s wi hin he economy ace de l a ion and whe e i comes om. We can also ha dly assess whe he de l a ion- ecession heo ies hold. Second, episodes o de l a ion in he agg ega e CPI o in he GDP de l a o ha e been sca ce in he pas decades. As a esul , s udies on de l a ion ha e had o ely on his o ical da a, o en be o e Wo ld Wa I. Wha e e hese s udies show, hei conclusions can be c i icized as i ele an , because hey a e based on ou da ed obse a ions. In his pape , we ake a di e en app oach. Ins ead o using agg ega e da a on GDP and in l a ion, we ocus on sec o da a on p oduc ion and p ices. Speci i cally, we use da a om he Czech S a is ical O i ce on p oduc ion, g oss alue added and p ices in sec o s o he Czech economy om 1993 o 2015. This da ase has h ee ad an ages: (1) i is ich in in o ma ion on i ms’ ou pu and inpu s, (2) i p o ides ecen obse a ions, and (3) i con ains nume ous episodes o sec o de l a ion, which would on he mac oeconomic le el be concealed unde he agg ega e CPI o de l a o numbe s. We hink his app oach is no el: we do no know o ano he s udy ha would analyze de l a ion and g ow h using sec o da a. We i nd ha , con a y o common wisdom, de l a iona y p essu es in he Czech economy ha e been coming om sec o s wi h inc easing ou pu and inc easing g oss alue added, no om he de e io a ing ones. This shows ha de l a ion was mos o en g ow h-d i en, ep esen ing ising p oduc i i y. This ex p oceeds as ollows. In Sec ion 1, we p esen he cu en s a e o esea ch on de l a ion and show i s main d awbacks. In Sec ion 2, we p esen ou sec o da a om na ional accoun s. We i s show some desc ip i e s a is ics in Sec ion 3. We hen pe o m eg ession analysis in Sec ion 4, whe e we use he i xed e ec s model and Gene al Me hod o Momen s es ima ion o eg ess he g ow h in p oduc ion and g oss alue added on he g ow h o p ices plus con ol a iables. The las sec ion concludes he pape . 1. Cu en Resea ch 1.1 Empi ical S udies The e a e h ee main lines o easoning why de l a ion is hough by many o be ha m ul o economic g ow h. Fi s , he expec a ion o alling p ices may delay spending by consume s DEFLATION AND OUTPUT ACROSS SECTORS: RESULTS FOR THE CZECH REPUBLIC Pa el Ryska, Pe Sklenář EM_4_2018.indd 94EM_4_2018.indd 94 28.11.2018 13:12:5728.11.2018 13:12:57 95 4, XXI, 2018 Economics and businesses. Fi ms see hei e enues all and i hey canno adjus wages and o he cos s acco dingly, hei ma gins sh ink and hey ha e o lay o wo ke s. Second, o a gi en nominal in e es a e, de l a ion aises he eal in e es a e, which in u n migh de e in es men . Thi d, i he e is signi i can indeb edness in he economy, de l a ion may cause bank up cies as i inc eases he eal alue o deb . Se e al s udies ha e a emp ed o assess empi ically whe he he alleged link be ween de l a ion and ecession holds. Bo do and Redish (2003) es ic hei a en ion o he Uni ed S a es and Canada in he pe iod 1870- 1913, which was ich in episodes o de l a ion. They i nd ha p ices did no a ec ou pu . Bo do, Lane and Redish (2004) add Ge many o he sample and each a simila conclusion. O he ecen s udies use long da ase s ha span mo e han a cen u y and con ain many coun ies. A keson and Kehoe (2004) conclude om hei eg ession o ou pu g ow h on g ow h o p ices ha in he whole sample, he co ela ion is close o ze o. An excep ion is he subsample o he G ea Dep ession in he 1930s, whe e he link was posi i e. Bo io and Fila do (2004) as well as Bo io e al. (2015) gene ally con i m his esul . By con as , Gue e o and Pa ke (2006) lean o he conclusion ha de l a ion is bad o g ow h, i nding an economically small bu s a is ically signi i can link. Acco ding o hem, lagged de l a ion nega i ely a ec s ou pu . Benhabib and Spiegel (2009) i nd a non-linea ela ionship be ween de l a ion and ecession. In ecen yea s, some esea che s ha e ocused on he link be ween expec ed in l a ion (o de l a ion) and consump ion. In e es ingly, hey ha e p oduced s a kly di e en esul s. Bachmann, Be g and Sims (2015), using ecen da a on he US economy, e use he hypo hesis ha he expec a ion o de l a ion leads o lowe p esen consump ion. By con as , Ichiue and Nishiguchi (2014) suppo his hypo hesis using su ey da a on mode n Japan. O e all, he exis ing empi ical wo k on de la ion is a he limi ed – which is su p ising gi en i s impo ance o mone a y policy – and inconclusi e. As we explain below, he e is a majo p oblem o applicabili y o he majo i y o hese s udies o mode n-day mone a y policy. 1.2 ‘Good’ o ‘Bad’ De l a ion? Two lines o hough can be aced in cu en mains eam mac oeconomics. The i s g oup conside s de l a ion decisi ely ha m ul and s udies ways o a oid i . He e we can include in l uen ial mac oeconomis s K ugman (1998), Be nanke (2002) o S ensson (2003). The second g oup akes a mo e de ailed look a de l a ion. Bo do and Redish (2003) coined he e ms ‘good’ and ‘bad’ de l a ion. De l a ion is o he good ype i is associa ed wi h ising ou pu . In pa icula , good de l a ion occu s when i ms in es o dec ease uni cos s and inc ease ou pu . As a esul , i he economy ope a es wi h a cons an money supply, consume s buy an inc eased ou pu wi h he same amoun o money, so he p ice le el dec eases. This is a synonym o an ou wa d shi in he agg ega e supply cu e. This si ua ion is hough o ha e been ypical o he p e-Wo ld Wa I pe iod. By con as , bad de l a ion is associa ed wi h alling ou pu . In his case, de l a ion esul s om dec easing nominal demand, which canno be immedia ely passed on o lowe p ices o inpu s. Fi ms see hei p o i abili y dec ease and cu p oduc ion. This was mos p obably one o he cha ac e is ics o he G ea Dep ession o he 1930s. O he wo ks adhe ing o his dis inc ion be ween good and bad de l a ion include Beckwo h (2007), Bo do and Fila do (2005) and o a ce ain ex en also Bo io e al. (2015). The e ms good and bad de l a ion do no desc ibe causali y – hey only desc ibe co ela ions. Fo example, bad de l a ion does no necessa ily mean ha de l a ion causes alling ou pu . Dec easing p ices may only be a symp om o alling demand, no he oo cause i sel . Howe e , he e ms may be use ul in p ac ice because policymake s y o de e mine he ype and decide whe he hey should o should no coun e ac i . I de l a ion esul s om dec easing nominal demand, cen al banks conside i undesi able and p e e o o se i by easing policy. On he con a y, i i esul s om cheape p oduc ion wi hou di ec link o demand, cen al banks may be mo e willing o le such de l a ion un i s cou se. The e o e, i we i nd ha mos de l a ion going on in he economy is o he good ype, i may ha e a di ec policy implica ion. Fo hese pu poses, he exis ing empi ical esea ch has a clea disad an age. All he s udies men ioned in Sec ion 1.1 use only agg ega e mac oeconomic a iables, mos o en he GDP and CPI in l a ion. This causes a ade-o : he agg ega e annual da a do no EM_4_2018.indd 95EM_4_2018.indd 95 28.11.2018 13:12:5828.11.2018 13:12:58 96 2018, XXI, 4 Ekonomie show almos any yea s wi h de l a ion in he las decades o mos de eloped economies (Fo he Czech Republic, oo, he agg ega e p ice de l a o shows only one yea wi h de l a ion in he pe iod 1993-2015.). When esea ches wan o use agg ega e da a and lea n mo e abou de l a ion, hey ha e o use p e-Wo ld Wa I da a which a e ich in obse a ions o de l a ion. Bu hen he esul s a e based on old obse a ions which may ha e li le ele ance o oday because mone a y egimes ha e changed, he e a e s a kly di e en le els o deb , he e is mo e i nancial in e media ion, e c. By con as , using sec o da a, we ha e many episodes o mode n-day de l a ion and we ci cum en he ade-o . We a e hus be e equipped o make judgmen s abou a po en ial link be ween p ices and ou pu and o assess pa icula de l a ion- ecession heo ies. (Below we use he e ms in l a ion and de l a ion also o he change o sec o p ices. Some may insis ha in l a ion and de l a ion deno e only agg ega e p ice mo emen s, bu no sec o p ice mo emen s. Howe e , all agg ega e numbe s ha e hei sou ces in hei componen s, and i is p ecisely hese sou ces ha we analyse below. Thus we use in l a ion and de l a ion in he b oade sense.) 2. Da a We use da a om he Czech S a is ical O i ce (2017). I has comple e da a on 86 sec o s o he Czech economy as de i ned in na ional accoun s. The de i ni ion o each indus y is based on NACE classi i ca ion and alues a e published in he s a is ics o Na ional Accoun s. The da a spans om 1993 o 2015. As we use g ow h in a iables a he han le els, one ime pe iod d ops ou , so we ha e 22 ime pe iods. Tha gi es a o al o 1892 obse a ions. The a iables a e ou pu p ices (implici p ice de l a o ), ou pu , g oss alue added (GVA), employmen and in e media e inpu s. Ou pu , GVA, employmen and in e media e inpu s a e a ailable bo h in nominal and eal e ms, bu in his a icle we use hem in eal e ms (i.e., in cons an p ices) as we a e in e es ed in assessing he e ec o p ices on eal ou pu o i ms. An impo an ea u e o he NACE classi i ca ion is ha i does no co e only sec o s p oducing o i nal consump ion, bu also sec o s uppe in he p oduc ion chain – i.e., sec o s p oducing capi al goods and in e media e inpu s. As a esul , i ms’ ou pu does no mean only consume goods bough by consume s, bu also capi al goods bough by o he i ms. Fig. 1: P oduc ion and GVA g ow h agains change o p ices Sou ce: Czech S a is ical O i ce (2017), own compu a ions EM_4_2018.indd 96EM_4_2018.indd 96 28.11.2018 13:12:5828.11.2018 13:12:58 97 4, XXI, 2018 Economics 3. Desc ip i e S a is ics In ou sample, posi i e p ice g ow h p e ails and accoun s o 80% o all obse a ions (see Fig. 1). A he same ime, app oxima ely h ee i hs o obse a ions ha e posi i e g ow h o p oduc ion and g oss alue added. As a esul , oughly hal o obse a ions lie in he op- igh quad an in Fig. 1. In his sec ion we ocus on basic s a is ical ela ionships be ween he sign o p ice change (in l a ion/de l a ion) and he sign and g ow h a e o p oduc ion o GVA. In pa icula , we ocus on whe he declines in p oduc ion a e associa ed wi h de l a ion. In Tab. 1, we epo he compa ison o g ow h in p oduc ion and g oss alue added unde inc easing e sus dec easing p ices. We also isualize he compa isons wi h densi y g aphs in Fig. 2. Ou o obse a ions wi h p ice de l a ion, 69.7% eco ded posi i e g ow h in eal p oduc ion, while he co esponding pe cen age o obse a ions wi h in l a ion is only 58.8%. This is also e l ec ed in he a e ages: he a e age g ow h a e o p oduc ion du ing episodes o p ice de l a ion is 5.47%, which is sizably highe han he a e age g ow h wi h in l a ion (2.85%). The e o e, his p elimina y obse a ion con adic s he no ion ha de l a ion is linked o subpa ou pu g ow h. To check his i nding, we also an a o mal es o equali y o means. As seen in Tab. 2, he - es ejec s he null hypo hesis ha he a e age p oduc ion g ow h unde in l a ion is equal o ha unde de l a ion, he eby con i ming he i nding. In con as , he s anda d de ia ions o g ow h a es a e simila , which is also suppo ed by he es ing o equali y o a iances. We pe o med he same analysis also o eal g oss alue added (see Tab. 1). He e he be e pe o mance unde de l a ion is e en mo e p onounced: 77.8% o de l a iona y obse a ions epo posi i e g ow h in g oss alue added, while o in l a iona y obse a ions he pe cen age is only 52.3%. The a e age g ow h o g oss alue added is 14.1% wi h de l a ion, while only 0.68% wi h in l a ion. The di e ence is also con i med by he - es . The only di e ence wi h g oss alue added as opposed o p oduc ion is he highe s anda d de ia ion wi h de l a ion han wi h in l a ion. The eason o hese a he con incing i ndings may be he p e alence o ‘good de l a ion’ in ou sample: he sec o s ha epo ed p oduc p ice de l a ion could be p ecisely he ones ha in es ed mos in p oduc ion and he e o e enabled cheape and g ea e p oduc ion. Anyway, his p elimina y look uns agains he claim ha de l a ion ha ms p ospec s o g ow h. In he Appendix, we e e se ou pe spec i e and ask he ques ion how much g ow h in p ices he e is unde he opposi e scena ios o ise and all in p oduc ion and GVA. All da a In l a ion De l a ion Obse a ions 1,892 1,509 383 P oduc ion obs. wi h p oduc ion inc ease 61.00% 58.80% 69.70% obs. wi h p oduc ion dec ease 39.00% 41.20% 30.30% Mean g ow h 3.38 2.85 5.47 S anda d de ia ion o g ow h 12.89 12.71 13.39 G oss alue added obs. wi h GVA inc ease 57.50% 52.30% 77.80% obs. wi h GVA dec ease 42.50% 47.70% 22.20% Mean g ow h 3.40 0.68 14.10 S anda d de ia ion o g ow h 34.86 25.74 57.05 Sou ce: Czech S a is ical O i ce (2017), own compu a ions Tab. 1: G ow h o p oduc ion and GVA unde in l a ion and de l a ion EM_4_2018.indd 97EM_4_2018.indd 97 28.11.2018 13:12:5828.11.2018 13:12:58 98 2018, XXI, 4 Ekonomie This complemen s ou esul he e ha slowe p ice g ow h o ou igh de l a ion is accompanied by quicke ou pu g ow h. 4. Reg ession Analysis 4.1 Time A e ages As a i s look on co ela ions, we pe o med a simple eg ession o ime a e ages. We eg essed a e age annual ou pu g ow h in he 86 sec o s o he Czech economy o e 1993- 2015 on he co esponding a e age annual p ice g ow h, as seen in Tab. 3. In wha ollows below, we deno e x he annual pe cen age change in a iable X. Tha is, p is he g ow h in p ices, q in eal ou pu (p oduc ion) and g a in eal g oss alue added. We es ed he esul s in Tab. 3 o he p esence o he e oscedas ici y and whene e i was de ec ed we used he Whi e’s he e oscedas ici y-co ec ed co a iance ma ix. Tes s a is ic p- alue P oduc ion - es o equali y o means 3.44*** <0.001 F- es o equali y o a iances 1.11 0.19 G oss alue added - es o equali y o means 4.49*** <0.001 F- es o equali y o a iances 4.91*** <0.001 Sou ce: Czech S a is ical O i ce (2017), own compu a ions No e: We use he Welch - es , i.e., a s anda d unpai ed and wo-sided - es o de e mine whe he he means o p odu- c ion g ow h unde in l a ion and de l a ion a e equal o each o he . The null hypo hesis is ha he wo means a e equal. To es he equali y o a iances, we use an F- es , whe e he null hypo hesis is ha he a io o he a iances o he samples is equal o 1. No e: The sign *** deno es signi i cance a 1% le el. Tab. 2: Tes s o equali y o means and a iances Fig. 2: Densi y o p oduc ion and GVA g ow h unde de l a ion and in l a ion Sou ce: Czech S a is ical O i ce (2017), own compu a ions EM_4_2018.indd 98EM_4_2018.indd 98 28.11.2018 13:12:5828.11.2018 13:12:58 99 4, XXI, 2018 Economics The eg ession coe i cien on p (pe cen age g ow h in p ices) is -1.142, signi i can a 1%, sugges ing ha slowe p ice g ow h has been associa ed wi h as e ou pu g ow h. As depic ed in Fig. 3, he e is one dis inc ou lie on op le . This sec o is he manu ac u ing o compu e , elec onic and op ical p oduc s. In e es ingly, i is bo h he sec o wi h he as es g ow h a e o p oduc ion and he only sec o wi h a e age annual de l a ion o e 1993- 2015. We also an he eg ession wi hou his ou lie , bu he nega i e coe i cien and high s a is ical signi i cance emain (see Tab. 3). We ied lea ing ou up o 10 mos ex eme obse a ions, bu he nega i e and s a is ically signi i can coe i cien o p emained. We can obse e he gene al pa e n o he sec o s in he Czech economy om Fig. 3: while All da a Wi hou ou lie Coe i cien p- alue Coe i cien p- alue Reg essing q on: In e cep 7.082*** <0.001 -6.118*** <0.001 p -1.142*** <0.001 -0.919*** <0.001 Obse a ions 86 85 Adj. R2 0.237 0.167 Reg essing g a on: In e cep 8.996*** <0.001 8.824*** <0.001 p -1.998*** <0.001 -1.819*** <0.001 Obse a ions 86 85 Adj. R2 0.380 0.323 Sou ce: Czech S a is ical O i ce (2017), own compu a ions No e: The sign *** deno es signi i cance a 1% le el. Tab. 3: Time a e ages: Reg ession o a e age annual g ow h in ou pu and GVA on in l a ion Fig. 3: Reg essing ime a e ages: (a) Ou pu g ow h on in l a ion, (b) GVA g ow h on in l a ion (all da a) Sou ce: Czech S a is ical O i ce (2017), own compu a ions EM_4_2018.indd 99EM_4_2018.indd 99 28.11.2018 13:12:5828.11.2018 13:12:58 100 2018, XXI, 4 Ekonomie he con ac ing sec o s had bo h low and high in l a ion, booming sec o s ended o ha e lowe in l a ion and hose ha expanded mos quickly – wi h g ow h a e o ou pu abo e 10% – had exclusi ely low in l a ion o ou igh de l a ion. The esul s sugges ha highe ou pu g ow h is linked o slowe p ice g ow h, i.e. low in l a ion o ou igh de l a ion. Howe e , i may no be e iden wha happens o i ms’ p o i s as in l a ion slows o u ns in o de l a ion. We he e o e used g ow h in eal g oss alue added ins ead o eal ou pu g ow h and eg essed i on p ice g ow h. The esul s a e e y simila o hose wi h ou pu g ow h (see Tab. 3 and Fig. 3). O e all, his e idence oo seems o un agains he de l a ion- ecession heo ies. In ou sample, as e ou pu g ow h and p o i g ow h a e associa ed wi h slowe in l a ion o ou igh de l a ion. This could sugges ha highe p oduc ion mos o en esul s om in es men in o lowe -cos p oduc ion, o which consume s eac by pu chasing mo e. 4.2 Panel Da a Two Models Using panel da a na u ally o e s much mo e in o ma ion han ime a e ages because we can make use o he en i e a ia ion o annual obse a ions. Ou da a a e in he o m o balanced panel da a and we use he i xed e ec s model o es ima ion. This model allows unobse ed sec o -speci i c e ec s o ha e any co ela ion wi h he explici eg esso s. We es ima ed he models below using he so-called ‘wi hin es ima ion’. Gene ally, we use wo economic models o es ima ion. The i s is an au o eg essi e dis ibu ed lag (ADL) model which akes a mac oeconomic app oach o p ices and p oduc ion. Jus as s udies ci ed in Sec ion 1.1 eg ess GDP g ow h on p ice g ow h (in l a ion o de l a ion), we eg ess sec o ou pu g ow h on he espec i e g ow h in ou pu p ices o he gi en sec o . This di ec ly add esses he ques ion o co ela ion be ween p ices and ou pu . We also include lagged a iables. Fo example, we es ima e qi = â0 + â1qi -1 + â2 pi + â3 pi -1 + ai + ui (1) whe e qi is eal ou pu g ow h in sec o i and yea , pi g ow h in ou pu p ices in he sec o (bo h in pe cen e ms), ai he sec o -speci i c unobse ed e ec and ui he e o e m. The second model, in con as , akes a mo e mic oeconomic, i m-le el app oach. To p oduce ou pu , i ms mus employ wo ke s and buy in e media e inpu s. The e o e, he model we es ima e is qi = â0 + b1 pi + â 2empi + â3inpi + ai + ui (2) whe e emp is g ow h in labou employed (measu ed in o al hou s wo ked) and inp g ow h in he olume o in e media e inpu s in p oduc ion. The eg esso s include wo usual inpu s in he neoclassical p oduc ion unc ion ( o why we exclude capi al K, see ou discussion below) plus a special e m – he ou pu p ice change p. P oduc i i y, o e i ciency o p oduc ion, is usually accoun ed o as a esidual, i.e., wha emains unexplained in ou pu p oduced i we ake in o accoun changes in labou , capi al and in e media e inpu s. Fi ms ypically in es o ake o he measu es in o de o make p oduc ion mo e e i cien . A e hey do so, hey can p oduce mo e and wi h lowe cos s, so hey can o e hei p oduc s mo e cheaply and each mo e cus ome s. I his is he case, hen he ou pu p ice P ac s as a p oxy o e i ciency. The lowe is he cos o p oduc ion, he lowe is he obse ed p ice P. The e o e, p ice g ow h p is no only a a iable ha we add o i nd ou abou i s co ela ion wi h ou pu g ow h q, bu i also has a conc e e economic in e p e a ion as a p oxy o he e i ciency o p oduc ion. Equa ion 1 abo e con ains he lagged dependen a iable qi -1 among eg esso s. As a esul , he i xed-e ec s es ima o is gene ally no consis en . As Woold idge (2002) shows, he bias alls a a a e 1/T as T g ows, and o a ime dimension high enough, he inconsis ency would be negligible. We hink ha wi h ou T = 22, we do ha e a T high enough o be su e ha mos o he bias disappea s. Howe e , as a check we also pe o m Gene al Me hod o Momen s (GMM) es ima ion in equa ions whe e he e a e lagged dependen a iables. Ou GMM es ima ion ollows A ellano and Bond’s (1991) wo-s ep p ocedu e and we use lags o o de 2 o 5 o he dependen a iable as ins umen al a iables. Finally, in he i xed e ec s models below, each eg ession was es ed o he e oscedas ici y and se ial co ela ion. When ei he o hese was de ec ed, a obus a iance ma ix es ima o was used o co ec he a iances and es s a is ics. EM_4_2018.indd 100EM_4_2018.indd 100 28.11.2018 13:12:5928.11.2018 13:12:59 101 4, XXI, 2018 Economics Resul s: Mac oeconomic App oach In he i s , mac oeconomic app oach, we es ima e he e ec o in l a ion on ou pu g ow h and GVA g ow h in an au o eg essi e dis ibu ed lag model. Tab. 4 shows ha con empo aneous in l a ion p is nega i ely linked wi h ou pu g ow h, con i ming ou i ndings om Sec ion 4.1 abo e. The GMM es ima ion b ings an es ima e o he coe i cien o p e y simila o he i xed e ec s es ima ion (-0.303 s. -0.293) and con i ms i s s a is ical signi i cance. By con as , he coe i cien o p -1 is economically and s a is ically less signi i can , bo h acco ding o i xed e ec s es ima ion and GMM. Simila ly o ou pu , in l a ion is nega i ely linked o he g ow h in g oss alue added o i ms (see he lowe hal o Tab. 4). The only di e ence is ha he magni ude o he coe i cien o p is bigge o g oss alue added han o ou pu as dependen a iable. This is unde s andable since i ms usually ha e ope a ing le e age: a ise in ou pu ( e enues) by 1% causes a ise in g oss p o i o mo e han 1%. Resul s: P oduc ion-Func ion App oach In he second, mo e mic oeconomic app oach, we use ypical inpu s in o p oduc ion unc ion as con ol a iables o assessing he impac o in l a ion on ou pu g ow h. These should be mo e powe ul con ol a iables as hey a e di ec ly linked o ou pu . We es ima e he equa ion wi h g ow h in labou emp ( o al hou s wo ked) and g ow h in he olume o in e media e inpu s inp as con ols. We ha e also added g ow h in g oss capi al s ock k o imi a e mo e he adi ional p oduc ion unc ion Y = (L, K). Because da a on capi al s ock ha e poo e a ailabili y han o he da a, we used an al e na i e sou ce om he OECD (2016). I is bo h na owe (only 57 sec o s) and sho e (1995-2009) han ou main da ase , so i has much ewe obse a ions (798). Resul s om his enla ged eg ession ha includes k a e no ma e ially di e en om hose epo ed in Tab. 5 and we do no epo hem he e. As expec ed, his model shows a much highe i as Adj. R2 is as high as 0.638 in he ou pu eg ession in Tab. 5. And again, in l a ion nega i ely a ec s ou pu g ow h (-0.476) wi h high s a is ical signi i cance. Labou and in e media e inpu s also ha e he expec ed signs and high signi i cance. In he GVA eg ession, in l a ion also has a nega i e coe i cien and he coe i cien is again g ea e in absolu e magni ude. In e es ingly, while he labou inpu has a posi i e and s a is ically signi i can impac on GVA, in e media e inpu s lose hei signi i cance. In e p e a ion The empi ical esul s b ing, in ou iew, wo impo an i ndings. Fixed e ec s GMM Coe i cien p- alue Coe i cien p- alue Reg essing q on: q -1 0.012 0.696 0.042 0.231 p -0.293*** 0.003 -0.303** 0.014 p -1 0.136* 0.052 0.110 0.121 Obse a ions 1,806 1,720 Adj. R2 0.017 - Reg essing g a on: g a -1 -0.086*** 0.002 -0.178 0.236 p -1.614*** <0.001 -1.768*** <0.001 p -1 0.614 0.173 0.393 0.617 Obse a ions 1,806 1,720 Adj. R2 0.068 - Sou ce: Czech S a is ical O i ce (2017), own compu a ions No e: The sign * deno es s a is ical signi i cance a 10%, ** a 5% and *** a 1% le el. Tab. 4: ADL: Reg ession o g ow h in ou pu and GVA on in l a ion EM_4_2018.indd 101EM_4_2018.indd 101 28.11.2018 13:12:5928.11.2018 13:12:59 102 2018, XXI, 4 Ekonomie Fi s ly, he nega i e ela ionship be ween g ow h in ou pu and g ow h in p ices sugges s ha obse ed de l a ion has been p edominan ly o he ‘good’ ype. I alling p ices esul ed om alling nominal demand, i ms would no espond by inc easing p oduc ion – on he con a y, hey would cu i , as he ‘bad de l a ion’ hypo hesis goes. Hence, we would obse e a posi i e co ela ion be ween p and q. The al e na i e hypo hesis is ha as i ms in es and imp o e e i ciency, hey manage o cu uni cos s and p ices. This allows hem o sell mo e p oduc s, i.e., each new ma ginal demand h ough lowe p ices. This ‘good de l a ion’ hypo hesis is consis en wi h ou i ndings – we see epea edly a nega i e ela ionship be ween p and q. I could be a gued ha he nega i e ela ionship be ween p and q may in some mo e in l a iona y yea s e l ec a he he compa ison o high e sus low in l a ion han in l a ion e sus de l a ion. Tha may be ue. The shi o he agg ega e demand cu e – o example, h ough cen al bank easing – may mo e he whole mass o obse a ions o he igh in Fig. 3, b inging many o hem ou o he de l a iona y sec ion. Symme ically, lack o agg ega e nominal demand may push hem o he le , which was he case o ins ance in 2009 when he economy as a whole had a 1.4% de l a ion (measu ed as ou pu de l a o ). Howe e , a he han ocusing on he posi ion o he mass o obse a ions, we a e in e es ed in he slope o he eg ession line – ha is, in he shape o he mass. I s nega i e slope sugges s ha he endency o cu p ices o a leas ha e slowe p ice inc eases han he a e age is associa ed wi h g owing i ms, no declining ones. O e all, we a e no claiming ha ‘bad de l a ion’ does no exis o ha i canno be ha m ul. We a e only showing e idence ha he e is much mo e ‘good de l a ion’ han ‘bad de l a ion’ in ou sample. Secondly, using g oss alue added in addi ion o ou pu , we ha e shown ha lowe p ices a e no only associa ed wi h g ea e ou pu , bu also wi h g ea e g oss p o i o i ms. Ou pu in i sel is no he i ms’ goal, bu p o i is. I i ms in es o inc ease p oduc ion and cu p ices, hey also succeed in inc easing p o i s, ou esul s show. This i nding is impo an because one line o easoning (s a ing wi h Fishe , 1933) is ha de l a ion o oo low in l a ion ul ima ely e odes i ms’ p o i s and leads hem o bank up cies. Ou esul s show o he wise, again p o iding suppo o he case ha de l a ion in ou sample s ems om i ms’ own ini ia i es, no om nega i e shocks ha would squeeze p o i s. As poin ed ou in Sec ion 2, he sec o s used a e no only hose ha p oduce consume Fixed e ec s Coe i cien p- alue Reg essing q on: p -0.476*** <0.001 emp 0.280*** <0.001 inp 0.582*** <0.001 Obse a ions 1,700 Adj. R2 0.638 Reg essing g a on: p -1.663*** <0.001 emp 0.889*** <0.001 inp 0.062 0.637 Obse a ions 1,700 Adj. R2 0.112 Sou ce: Czech S a is ical O i ce (2017), own compu a ions No e: The sign *** deno es signi i cance a 1% le el. Tab. 5: P oduc ion unc ion: Reg ession o g ow h in ou pu and GVA on in l a ion EM_4_2018.indd 102EM_4_2018.indd 102 28.11.2018 13:12:5928.11.2018 13:12:59