Reversible protein aggregation as cytoprotective mechanism against heat stress
Abstract
© The Author(s) 2021.
Full text
Vol.:(0123456789) 1 3 Current Genetics (2021) 67:849–855 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-021-01191-2 MINI-REVIEW Reversible protein aggregation ascytoprotective mechanism againstheat stress Paola Gallardo1,2· SilviaSalas‑Pino1· RafaelR.Daga1 Received: 23 February 2021 / Revised: 24 April 2021 / Accepted: 27 April 2021 / Published online: 6 June 2021 © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Temperature fluctuation is one of the most frequent threats to which organisms are exposed in nature. The activation of gene expression programs that trigger the transcription of heat stress-protective genes is the main cellular response to resist high temperatures. In addition, reversible accumulation and compartmentalization of thermosensitive proteins in high-order molecular assemblies are emerging as critical mechanisms to ensure cellular protection upon heat stress. Here, we summarize representative examples of membrane-less intracellular bodies formed upon heat stress in yeasts and human cells and highlight how protein aggregation can be turned into a cytoprotective mechanism. Introduction High temperature induces the unfolding and exposure of hydrophobic stretches in thermosensitive proteins, which can establish non-native intraand inter-molecular interactions leading to aggregation into high-order protein assemblies (Chiti and Dobson 2006; Kammerer etal. 2004; Tyedmers etal. 2010). Furthermore, a significant part of the proteome contains intrinsically disordered domains (IDD) (Oldfield and Dunker 2014; Uversky 2017). IDDs usually show high structural flexibility and, under environmental perturbations, such as high temperature, they can acquire new folding states that make them more prone to establish interactions with other proteins. This leads to phase separation and the concentration of molecules in intracellular condensates (Alberti and Hyman 2021; Dyson and Wright 2005; Fomicheva and Ross 2021; Franzmann and Alberti 2019; Uversky and Dunker 2010). The dynamic properties of IDDs also contribute to the formation of protein aggregates under more extreme stress conditions (Kim etal. 2013; Molliex etal. 2015; Patel etal. 2015). Cells respond to protein folding stress by activating the heat stress response (HSR), a transcriptional program that induces the expression of heat stress-response proteins (HSPs) such as chaperones and other cytoprotective factors, which boost the refolding of damaged proteins or their clearance by proteolytic mechanisms (Richter etal. 2010; Verghese etal. 2012). However, conditions of high proteotoxic stress that overcome the protein quality-control system may result in persistent protein aggregates which have been classically linked to a pervasive cellular decline and the development of degenerative and age-related diseases (pathological aggregation) (Diaz-Villanueva etal. 2015; Hipp etal. 2014; Klaips etal. 2018; Schneider and Bertolotti 2015). Interestingly, the accumulation of proteins in aggregates has also been more recently described as an organized and reversible process that displays cytoprotective functions (physiological aggregation) (Audas etal. 2016; Franzmann and Alberti 2019; Marijan etal. 2019; Tyedmers etal. 2010). This protective protein aggregation results in the formation of a variety of specific membrane-less inclusion bodies or biomolecular condensates, with different cellular locations, physico-chemical properties, and functions (Gallardo etal.2020; Shav-Tal etal. 2005; Sontag etal. 2017; Tyedmers etal. 2010; van Leeuwen and Rabouille 2019; Wallace etal. 2015; Wang Communicated by Michael Polymenis. * Silvia Salas-Pino [email protected] * Rafael R. Daga r[email protected] 1 Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, Universidad Pablo de Olavide-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Junta de Andalucía, Seville, Spain 2 European Research Institute fortheBiology ofAgeing, University ofGroningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
850 Current Genetics (2021) 67:849–855 1 3 etal. 2018). This review summarizes current knowledge on biomolecular condensates induced by HS in yeasts and humans with a focus on the recently described nucleolar rings (NuRs) in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. We discuss the function of the Hsf1-dependent HSR in the regulation of NuRs and its role in the maintenance of cell viability in high proteotoxic conditions such as acute HS. Stress granules andcytoplasmic protein aggregation centers. One of the most conserved and well-described inclusion bodies are the cytoplasmic stress granules (SGs) that are rapidly formed as a response to several environmental stresses, including high temperature (Fig.1) (Buchan and
851Current Genetics (2021) 67:849–855 1 3 Parker 2009). SGs are biomolecular condensates containing mainly RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), translationally repressed mRNAs, translation factors, and 40S ribosomal subunits. SG formation is driven by the unfolding and promiscuous interactions of IDDs present in RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and involves a number of post-translational protein modifications (Hofmann etal. 2021; Molliex etal. 2015). SGs are dynamic structures that contribute to the repression of protein synthesis upon stress and are considered sites of mRNA triage, sorting towards the decay or the storage of mRNAs (Alberti etal. 2017; Anderson and Kedersha 2009). Other cytosolic biomolecular condensates termed protein aggregate centers (PACs) have been recently described to form in the fission yeast upon exposure to a mild HS (37℃) (Fig.1B) (Cabrera etal. 2020). PACs are dynamic assemblies that contain chaperones and components of the translational machinery; however, misfolded proteins also accumulate at PACs and this is required to avoid their degradation during the HS. Therefore, PACs have been proposed to protect these non-terminally misfolded proteins from degradation. PACs behave as liquid-like condensates that change to a more compacted state upon incubation of cells at higher temperatures, which suggests that PACs can function as seeds for SG formation. The assembly and disassembly of SGs and PACs are regulated by Hsp70 chaperones (Boronat etal. 2021; Cabrera etal. 2020; Cherkasov etal. 2013; Kroschwald etal. 2015; Mateju etal. 2017; O’Driscoll etal. 2015; Walters etal., 2015), and the disaggregase Hsp104 is key for their dissolution (Cabrera etal. 2020; Cherkasov etal. 2013; Kroschwald etal. 2015). Insoluble protein deposit, CytoQ, andIntranuclear quality‑control compartment. Other protein deposition centers have been observed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a result of HS. These include insoluble protein deposit (IPOD) and CytoQ in the cytoplasm, and intra-nuclear quality-control compartment (INQ) in the nucleus (Fig.1A). IPODs are perivacuolar deposits constituted by immobile, terminally aggregated proteins, including the amyloidogenic prion proteins Rnq1 and Sup35 (Kaganovich etal. 2008; Kumar etal. 2016), while CytoQ refers to different cytoplasmic condensates containing cytosolic non-terminally misfolded proteins. On the contrary, INQ, also termed juxtanuclear quality-control compartment (JUNQ), localize inside the nucleus, adjacent to the nucleolus, and harbor nuclear and cytosolic misfolded proteins (Kaganovich etal. 2008; Miller etal. 2015). CytoQ and INQ share similarities in their formation, which is dependent on cell-compartment-specific aggregases: the cytoplasmic small HSP (sHSP) Hsp42 for CytoQs and the nuclear aggregase Btn2 for INQs. Hsp42 and Btn2 function as sorting factors that promote the partitioning of misfolded proteins into CytoQs or INQs, respectively (Malinovska etal. 2012; Miller etal. 2015; Specht etal. 2011), and their activities are key to avoid the overload of the proteostatic capacity and, consequently, to prevent the loss of cell viability. Nonterminally unfolded proteins stored at CytoQs and INQs will be mainly targeted to the refolding pathway (Ho etal. 2019; Miller etal. 2015; Wallace etal. 2015), whereas terminally misfolded substrates accumulated at IPODs are either targeted for clearance (mainly by autophagy) or diluted by cell division (Kaganovich etal. 2008). Of note, in both cases, the Hsp70 chaperone system and the disaggregase Hsp104 participate in their sorting and re-solubilization (Gallina etal. 2015; Ho etal. 2019; Kaganovich etal. 2008; Malinovska etal. 2012; Miller etal. 2015; O’Driscoll etal. 2015). Aggresomes, nuclear stress bodies, andamyloid bodies Human cells have also been shown to form specialized inclusion bodies for sequestering misfolded proteins under HS. These include SGs and aggresomes in the cytoplasm, and nuclear stress bodies (nSBs) and amyloid bodies (AB) in the nucleus (Fig.1C). Fig. 1 Cytoprotective aggregation centers under HS. Schematic representation of different intracellular biomolecular condensates formed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and human cells at different cellular locations upon HS. A Biomolecular condensates in S. cerevisiae upon HS. SGs and CytoQ encompass different cytoplasmic condensates, which contain non-terminally misfolded proteins mainly destined for refolding after the stress, similar to the INQ formed in the nucleus adjacent to the nucleolus. IPODs, however, are aggregate deposits formed in the cytoplasm adjacent to the vacuole, which accumulate terminally misfolded proteins destined for degradation. B Two types of cytoplasmic condensates have been described in S. pombe; PACs and SGs. PACs form upon mild HS and accumulate non-terminally misfolded proteins whose fate is refolding. PACs have been proposed to constitute the precursors of SGs formed upon more severe stress conditions. In the nucleus, misfolded proteins accumulate at NuRs upon acute HS. NuRs form at the nucleolar region and function as reversible protein sequestering centers. Upon stress relief, NuRs dissolution is linked to the restoration of cell growth. C Upon stress conditions, human cells form different cytoplasmic deposition sites, such as SGs or aggresomes. Aggresomes represent sites of terminal aggregation of damaged proteins whose destiny is degradation by autophagic mechanisms. In the nucleus, human cells protect thermosensitive proteins by their coalescence along with lncRNAs transcribed from ribosomal intergenic spacers in nucleolar structures known as amyloid bodies (ABs). AB are reversible structures and have been shown to promote local nuclear translation during the stress. On the other hand, nSBs are nuclear assemblies of RNA and proteins formed upon HS which function by sequestering transcription-related factors facilitating the HS-induced inhibition of bulk RNA transcription ◂
852 Current Genetics (2021) 67:849–855 1 3 Aggresome assembly depends on the active delivery (by dynein motor complex) and the accumulation of aggresomal particles containing misfolded proteins near the centrosome (Johnston etal. 1998) (Fig.1). Aggresomes recruit chaperones, ubiquitination enzymes, and proteasomes and, in conditions of insufficient proteasome degradation, the prolonged presence of aggresomes results in their autophagic clearance (Johnston etal. 1998; Tyedmers etal. 2010). Therefore, they are considered as garbage depositories that aid in the clearance of terminally aggregated proteins (Kawaguchi etal. 2003; Tyedmers etal. 2010). On the other hand, ABs are formed in the nucleus by the rapid and reversible interaction between heterogeneous proteins and ribosomal intergenic non-coding RNA (rIGSRNA). rIGSRNAs are expressed in a stress-inducible manner and act as the seeding elements for AB formation in subnuclear foci, trapping, and immobilizing proteins that are characterized by their insolubility. Upon stress relief, ABs are disaggregated in an HSP70-dependent manner and their components return to their normal localization (Audas etal. 2016, 2012). Interestingly, a new and unexpected function has been recently ascribed to ABs as solid-like condensates that support nuclear translation of Hsf1 targets during acidosis and HS (Theodoridis etal. 2021). Another subnuclear foci that is found exclusively in primates upon heat and chemical stresses are the nuclear stress bodies (nSBs) (Biamonti and Vourc’h 2010). nSB formation is initiated by binding of Hsf1 to pericentric tandem repeats of satellite III (Sat 3). Hsf1-dependent transcription of Sat 3 transcripts promotes the binding and sequestration of transcription factors and RBPs to these long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). Sat3 transcripts tend to stay associated with the transcription site, forming subnuclear foci that concentrate and sequester several nuclear factors required for transcription, mainly at the 9q12 locus (Biamonti and Vourc’h 2010). nSBs do not seem to colocalize with Hsf1 canonical targets of the HSR, suggesting that nSB formation is not required for the transcription of HSR genes (Jolly etal. 1997). However, nSB assembly is required to sustain the HS-induced transcriptional repression and to maintain cell viability after the HS (Goenka etal. 2016) and, therefore, they have been proposed to function as sequestering centers which facilitate the downregulation of general transcription during the stress. Nucleolar rings In fission yeast, acute heat stress (42℃), which prevents bulk protein synthesis and blocks general mRNA metabolism (Cabrera etal. 2020; Gallardo etal. 2020; Ribeiro etal. 1997), results in a dramatic reorganization of the nucleus. These nuclear architectural changes include nucleolar contraction and the formation of ring-shaped nucleolar aggregation centers, named Nucleolar Rings (NuR) (Gallardo etal. 2020). NuRs assemblies contain a wide and functionally divergent group of nuclear factors, including factors involved in mRNA processing and export, nuclear pore complex (NPC) components, mRNA, chromatin-associated factors, and cell cycle regulators. The formation of these assemblies is triggered by HSinduced unfolding and aggregation of proteins and RNAs (Gallardo etal. 2020). While the aggregation of cell cycle factors at NuRs could contribute to the arrest of cell division observed under this extreme temperature, the rearrangement of the NPC and mRNA machinery could be responsible for the block of housekeeping mRNA metabolism and export and for the formation of a reservoir of messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNPs) particles, which would be ready for export once stress conditions cease. This rearrangement bears similarities with the compositional changes of mRNPs under heat stress described for other organisms, including budding yeast and higher eukaryotes (Bond 1988; Bracken and Bond 1999; Hochberg-Laufer etal. 2019; Kay etal. 1987; Lutz etal. 1988; Mahl etal. 1989; Mayrand and Pederson, 1983; Sadis etal. 1988). In fact, in S. cerevisiae, heat stress leads to the uncoupling of several RBPs from the mRNA and their accumulation in nuclear foci, in a manner dependent on the nucleoporins Mlp1 and Mlp2. This reorganization has been proposed to prevent the quality control and export of regular mRNAs, while promoting the export of HS mRNAs (Carmody etal. 2010; Zander etal. 2016; Zander and Krebber 2017). The study of NuRs has shed light on the dynamic nature of these stress-induced assemblies. NuRs are formed by the rapid aggregation of multiple nuclear proteins, which remain mostly immobile, while the stress persists. However, when the stress is relieved, NuRs disaggregate and their multiple components relocate back to their functional localization (Gallardo etal. 2020). This shows that fission yeast cells can modulate protein aggregation, turning deleterious protein aggregates into cytoprotective protein sequestering centers which contribute to maintain cellular homeostasis. Hsf1 is the main transcription factor involved in the activation of the HSR (Akerfelt etal. 2010). Upon incubation of fission yeast cells at 42℃, Hsf1 rapidly accumulates in the nucleoplasm; however, it does not localize at NuRs. Interestingly, once the heat stress is over, cell growth recovery tightly correlates with a peak in Hsf1 expression (Gallardo etal. 2020). This delayed Hsf1 upregulation is also observed in S. cerevisiae during the recovery from severe heat shock (Yamamoto etal. 2008). Furthermore, a partial Hsf1 depletion significantly delays NuRs dissolution and cell growth reinitiation during the recovery from acute HS. This suggests that Hsf1 expression during the acute HS is limited, and that a burst in newly synthesized Hsf1 during the recovery period
853Current Genetics (2021) 67:849–855 1 3 is required to trigger the refolding of most heat-denatured proteinsin order to reactivate cellular metabolism (Gallardo etal. 2020; Yamamoto etal. 2008). Hsf1 activation leads to the expression of HSPs, such as chaperones and disaggregases (Akerfelt etal. 2010). These proteins localize at aggregates and are responsible for aggregate dissolution once the stress is over. In addition, chaperones are commanders in the triage of aggregated proteins for recycling or degradation during the recovery from HS (Balchin etal. 2016; Escusa-Toret etal. 2013; Hartl etal. 2011; Malinovska etal. 2012; Mogk etal. 2015; Vabulas etal. 2010). Consistently, NuRs accumulate several HSPs, such as the Hsp70 homologs Ssa1 and Ssa2, and the disaggregase Hsp104. Importantly, Hsp104 is required for NuR aggregate dissolution, for the relocalization of NuRs components, and for the resumption of cell growth after acute HS (Gallardo etal. 2020). This is in agreement with previous studies that have demonstrated that Hsp104, in concert with the chaperones Hsp70/Hsp40, functions in the reassembly of small nuclear RNPs after HS (Bracken and Bond 1999; Cherkasov etal. 2013; Haslbeck etal. 2005). Interestingly, a recent study in budding yeast shows that the Hsp70/Hsp40 chaperone partners aid in the solubilization of intra-nuclear inclusions formed after incubation of the cells at 42℃, independently on Hsp104. In these conditions, Hsp40 and Hsp104 compete for protein disaggregation, targeting proteins towards turnover or refolding, respectively (den Brave etal. 2020). Metazoans lack Hsp104 orthologues and the disaggregase activity is accomplished by Hsp70 and Hsp110, among others (Mogk etal. 2015; Rampelt etal. 2012; Shorter 2011). In conclusion, fission yeast NuRs are reversible molecular assemblies rapidly formed upon acute heat stress by the aggregation of nuclear and nucleolar factors along with RNA. Their formation correlates with nucleolar contraction and the inhibition of cell growth and their Hsp104-dependent dissolution is required for cell growth restoration once the heat stress is relieved. Therefore, NuRs can be considered emergency storage deposits for thermolabile proteins and its assembly might contribute to the inhibition of nuclear functions under acute HS. Concluding remarks As discussed above, HS elicits the formation of a variety of high-order-molecular assemblies, which are formed both in the cytoplasm and the nucleus, by the promiscuous interaction of misfolded proteins, IDD-containing proteins and usually RNA. Although the functions of all these intracellular protein deposits are still under investigation, they share a common role as protective mechanisms preserving cellular homeostasis during stress conditions and promoting cell survival. The concentration of proteins in biomolecular condensates contributes to inactivate unneeded or energetically consuming cellular functions and avoids the interference of misfolded proteins with stress-response cellular pathways. The local recruitment and concentration of HSPs at these condensates facilitates the refolding or clearance of stresssensitive proteins and can also promote the efficiency of essential processes, such as translation in the case of ABs. Understanding how chaperones modulate and reverse protein aggregation is of prime importance, since the formation of amyloid deposits has been linked to the development of a variety of degenerative diseases, such as Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s, or Parkinson’s disease, among others (Chiti and Dobson 2017). In addition, recent advances have shown that aging is associated with progressive exhaustion of the proteostatic capacity of cells and the formation of pathogenic aggresomes, which compromises multiple cellular processes (Hipp etal. 2019, 2014; Moreno-Blas etal. 2018; Morimoto 2008; Thiruvalluvan etal. 2020). Therefore, achieving a better knowledge of what factors and mechanisms are involved in the aggregation and disaggregation processes would be extremely valuable for future therapeutic strategies of age-related diseases. In this sense, yeasts as model organisms represent a valuable tool for genetic or drug screening purposes to find new modulators that could potentially alleviate pathologic aggregation in humans. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Daga’s lab members and our colleagues at the CABD for helpful discussions. Funding This work was supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (Grant: PGC2018-099849-B-I00 to R.R. Daga) and Junta de Andalucía-FEDER-UPO (grant: UPO-1264663 to S.S.P.). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/. References Akerfelt M, Morimoto RI, Sistonen L (2010) Heat shock factors: integrators of cell stress, development and lifespan. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:545–555
854 Current Genetics (2021) 67:849–855 1 3 Alberti S, Hyman AA (2021) Biomolecular condensates at the nexus of cellular stress, protein aggregation disease and ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 22:196–213 Alberti S, Mateju D, Mediani L, Carra S (2017) Granulostasis: protein quality control of RNP granules. Front Mol Neurosci 10:84 Anderson P, Kedersha N (2009) RNA granules: post-transcriptional and epigenetic modulators of gene expression. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:430–436 Audas TE, Jacob MD, Lee S (2012) Immobilization of proteins in the nucleolus by ribosomal intergenic spacer noncoding RNA. Mol Cell 45:147–157 Audas TE, Audas DE, Jacob MD, Ho JJ, Khacho M, Wang M, Perera JK, Gardiner C, Bennett CA, Head T, Kryvenko ON, Jorda M, Daunert S, Malhotra A, Trinkle-Mulcahy L, Gonzalgo ML, Lee S (2016) Adaptation to stressors by systemic protein amyloidogenesis. Dev Cell 39:155–168 Balchin D, Hayer-Hartl M, Hartl FU (2016) Invivo aspects of protein folding and quality control. Science. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. aac43 54 Biamonti G, Vourc’h C (2010) Nuclear stress bodies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2(6):a000695 Bond U (1988) Heat shock but not other stress inducers leads to the disruption of a sub-set of snRNPs and inhibition of invitro splicing in HeLa cells. EMBO J 7:3509–3518 Boronat S, Cabrera M, Hidalgo E (2021) Spatial sequestration of misfolded proteins as an active chaperone-mediated process during heat stress. Curr Genet 67:237–243 Bracken AP, Bond U (1999) Reassembly and protection of small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles by heat shock proteins in yeast cells. RNA 5:1586–1596 Buchan JR, Parker R (2009) Eukaryotic stress granules: the ins and outs of translation. Mol Cell 36:932–941 Cabrera M, Boronat S, Marte L, Vega M, Perez P, Ayte J, Hidalgo E (2020) Chaperone-facilitated aggregation of thermo-sensitive proteins shields them from degradation during heat stress. Cell Rep. 30(7):2430–2443 Carmody SR, Tran EJ, Apponi LH, Corbett AH, Wente SR (2010) The mitogen-activated protein kinase Slt2 regulates nuclear retention of non-heat shock mRNAs during heat shock-induced stress. Mol Cell Biol 30:5168–5179 Cherkasov V, Hofmann S, Druffel-Augustin S, Mogk A, Tyedmers J, Stoecklin G, Bukau B (2013) Coordination of translational control and protein homeostasis during severe heat stress. Curr Biol 23:2452–2462 Chiti F, Dobson CM (2006) Protein misfolding, functional amyloid, and human disease. Annu Rev Biochem 75:333–366 Chiti F, Dobson CM (2017) Protein misfolding, amyloid formation, and human disease: a summary of progress over the last decade. Annu Rev Biochem 86:27–68 den Brave F, Cairo LV, Jagadeesan C, Ruger-Herreros C, Mogk A, Bukau B, Jentsch S (2020) Chaperone-mediated protein disaggregation triggers proteolytic clearance of intra-nuclear protein inclusions. Cell Rep. 31(9):107680 Diaz-Villanueva JF, Diaz-Molina R, Garcia-Gonzalez V (2015) Protein folding and mechanisms of proteostasis. Int J Mol Sci 16:17193–17230 Dyson HJ, Wright PE (2005) Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:197–208 Escusa-Toret S, Vonk WI, Frydman J (2013) Spatial sequestration of misfolded proteins by a dynamic chaperone pathway enhances cellular fitness during stress. Nat Cell Biol 15:1231–1243 Fomicheva A, Ross ED (2021) From prions to stress granules: defining the compositional features of prion-like domains that promote different types of assemblies. Int J Mol Sci. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ ijms2 20312 51 Franzmann TM, Alberti S (2019) Protein phase separation as a stress survival strategy. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 11(6):034058 Gallardo P, Real-Calderon P, Flor-Parra I, Salas-Pino S, Daga RR (2020) Acute heat stress leads to reversible aggregation of nuclear proteins into nucleolar rings in fission yeast. Cell Rep. 33(6):108377 Gallina I, Colding C, Henriksen P, Beli P, Nakamura K, Offman J, Mathiasen DP, Silva S, Hoffmann E, Groth A, Choudhary C, Lisby M (2015) Cmr1/WDR76 defines a nuclear genotoxic stress body linking genome integrity and protein quality control. Nat Commun 6:6533 Goenka A, Sengupta S, Pandey R, Parihar R, Mohanta GC, Mukerji M, Ganesh S (2016) Human satellite-III non-coding RNAs modulate heat-shock-induced transcriptional repression. J Cell Sci 129:3541–3552 Hartl FU, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M (2011) Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature 475:324–332 Haslbeck M, Miess A, Stromer T, Walter S, Buchner J (2005) Disassembling protein aggregates in the yeast cytosol. The cooperation of Hsp26 with Ssa1 and Hsp104. J Biol Chem 280:23861–23868 Hipp MS, Park SH, Hartl FU (2014) Proteostasis impairment in protein-misfolding and -aggregation diseases. Trends Cell Biol 24:506–514 Hipp MS, Kasturi P, Hartl FU (2019) The proteostasis network and its decline in ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 20:421–435 Ho CT, Grousl T, Shatz O, Jawed A, Ruger-Herreros C, Semmelink M, Zahn R, Richter K, Bukau B, Mogk A (2019) Cellular sequestrases maintain basal Hsp70 capacity ensuring balanced proteostasis. Nat Commun 10:4851 Hochberg-Laufer H, Schwed-Gross A, Neugebauer KM, Shav-Tal Y (2019) Uncoupling of nucleo-cytoplasmic RNA export and localization during stress. Nucleic Acids Res 47:4778–4797 Hofmann S, Kedersha N, Anderson P, Ivanov P (2021) Molecular mechanisms of stress granule assembly and disassembly. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 1868(1):118876 Johnston JA, Ward CL, Kopito RR (1998) Aggresomes: a cellular response to misfolded proteins. J Cell Biol 143:1883–1898 Jolly C, Morimoto R, Robert-Nicoud M, Vourc’h C (1997) HSF1 transcription factor concentrates in nuclear foci during heat shock: relationship with transcription sites. J Cell Sci 110(Pt 23):2935–2941 Kaganovich D, Kopito R, Frydman J (2008) Misfolded proteins partition between two distinct quality control compartments. Nature 454:1088–1095 Kammerer RA, Kostrewa D, Zurdo J, Detken A, Garcia-Echeverria C, Green JD, Muller SA, Meier BH, Winkler FK, Dobson CM, Steinmetz MO (2004) Exploring amyloid formation by a de novo design. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S a 101:4435–4440 Kawaguchi Y, Kovacs JJ, McLaurin A, Vance JM, Ito A, Yao TP (2003) The deacetylase HDAC6 regulates aggresome formation and cell viability in response to misfolded protein stress. Cell 115:727–738 Kay RJ, Russnak RH, Jones D, Mathias C, Candido EP (1987) Expression of intron-containing C. elegans heat shock genes in mouse cells demonstrates divergence of 3’ splice site recognition sequences between nematodes and vertebrates, and an inhibitory effect of heat shock on the mammalian splicing apparatus. Nucleic Acids Res 15:3723–3741 Kim HJ, Kim NC, Wang YD, Scarborough EA, Moore J, Diaz Z, MacLea KS, Freibaum B, Li S, Molliex A, Kanagaraj AP, Carter R, Boylan KB, Wojtas AM, Rademakers R, Pinkus JL, Greenberg SA, Trojanowski JQ, Traynor BJ, Smith BN, Topp S, Gkazi AS, Miller J, Shaw CE, Kottlors M, Kirschner J, Pestronk A, Li YR, Ford AF, Gitler AD, Benatar M, King OD, Kimonis VE, Ross ED, Weihl CC, Shorter J, Taylor JP (2013) Mutations in prionlike domains in hnRNPA2B1 and hnRNPA1 cause multisystem proteinopathy and ALS. Nature 495:467–473
855Current Genetics (2021) 67:849–855 1 3 Klaips CL, Jayaraj GG, Hartl FU (2018) Pathways of cellular proteostasis in aging and disease. J Cell Biol 217:51–63 Kroschwald S, Maharana S, Mateju D, Malinovska L, Nuske E, Poser I, Richter D, Alberti S (2015) Promiscuous interactions and protein disaggregases determine the material state of stress-inducible RNP granules. Elife 4:e06807. https:// doi. org/ 10. 7554/ eLife. 06807 Kumar R, Nawroth PP, Tyedmers J (2016) Prion aggregates are recruited to the insoluble protein deposit (IPOD) via myosin 2-based vesicular transport. PLoS Genet 12(9):e1006324 Lutz Y, Jacob M, Fuchs JP (1988) The distribution of two hnRNPassociated proteins defined by a monoclonal antibody is altered in heat-shocked HeLa cells. Exp Cell Res 175:109–124 Mahl P, Lutz Y, Puvion E, Fuchs JP (1989) Rapid effect of heat shock on two heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein-associated antigens in HeLa cells. J Cell Biol 109:1921–1935 Malinovska L, Kroschwald S, Munder MC, Richter D, Alberti S (2012) Molecular chaperones and stress-inducible protein-sorting factors coordinate the spatiotemporal distribution of protein aggregates. Mol Biol Cell 23:3041–3056 Marijan D, Tse R, Elliott K, Chandhok S, Luo M, Lacroix E, Audas TE (2019) Stress-specific aggregation of proteins in the amyloid bodies. FEBS Lett 593:3162–3172 Mateju D, Franzmann TM, Patel A, Kopach A, Boczek EE, Maharana S, Lee HO, Carra S, Hyman AA, Alberti S (2017) An aberrant phase transition of stress granules triggered by misfolded protein and prevented by chaperone function. EMBO J 36:1669–1687 Mayrand S, Pederson T (1983) Heat shock alters nuclear ribonucleoprotein assembly in Drosophila cells. Mol Cell Biol 3:161–171 Miller SB, Ho CT, Winkler J, Khokhrina M, Neuner A, Mohamed MY, Guilbride DL, Richter K, Lisby M, Schiebel E, Mogk A, Bukau B (2015) Compartment-specific aggregases direct distinct nuclear and cytoplasmic aggregate deposition. EMBO J 34:778–797 Mogk A, Kummer E, Bukau B (2015) Cooperation of Hsp70 and Hsp100 chaperone machines in protein disaggregation. Front Mol Biosci 2:22 Molliex A, Temirov J, Lee J, Coughlin M, Kanagaraj AP, Kim HJ, Mittag T, Taylor JP (2015) Phase separation by low complexity domains promotes stress granule assembly and drives pathological fibrillization. Cell 163:123–133 Moreno-Blas D, Gorostieta-Salas E, Castro-Obregon S (2018) Connecting chaperone-mediated autophagy dysfunction to cellular senescence. Ageing Res Rev 41:34–41 Morimoto RI (2008) Proteotoxic stress and inducible chaperone networks in neurodegenerative disease and aging. Genes Dev 22:1427–1438 O’Driscoll J, Clare D, Saibil H (2015) Prion aggregate structure in yeast cells is determined by the Hsp104-Hsp110 disaggregase machinery. J Cell Biol 211:145–158 Oldfield CJ, Dunker AK (2014) Intrinsically disordered proteins and intrinsically disordered protein regions. Annu Rev Biochem 83:553–584 Patel A, Lee HO, Jawerth L, Maharana S, Jahnel M, Hein MY, Stoynov S, Mahamid J, Saha S, Franzmann TM, Pozniakovski A, Poser I, Maghelli N, Royer LA, Weigert M, Myers EW, Grill S, Drechsel D, Hyman AA, Alberti S (2015) A liquid-to-solid phase transition of the ALS protein FUS accelerated by disease mutation. Cell 162:1066–1077 Rampelt H, Kirstein-Miles J, Nillegoda NB, Chi K, Scholz SR, Morimoto RI, Bukau B (2012) Metazoan Hsp70 machines use Hsp110 to power protein disaggregation. EMBO J 31:4221–4235 Ribeiro MJ, Reinders A, Boller T, Wiemken A, De Virgilio C (1997) Trehalose synthesis is important for the acquisition of thermotolerance in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Microbiol 25:571–581 Richter K, Haslbeck M, Buchner J (2010) The heat shock response: life on the verge of death. Mol Cell 40:253–266 Sadis S, Hickey E, Weber LA (1988) Effect of heat shock on RNA metabolism in HeLa cells. J Cell Physiol 135:377–386 Schneider K, Bertolotti A (2015) Surviving protein quality control catastrophes–from cells to organisms. J Cell Sci 128:3861–3869 Shav-Tal Y, Blechman J, Darzacq X, Montagna C, Dye BT, Patton JG, Singer RH, Zipori D (2005) Dynamic sorting of nuclear components into distinct nucleolar caps during transcriptional inhibition. Mol Biol Cell 16:2395–2413 Shorter J (2011) The mammalian disaggregase machinery: Hsp110 synergizes with Hsp70 and Hsp40 to catalyze protein disaggregation and reactivation in a cell-free system. PLoS ONE 6(10):e26319 Sontag EM, Samant RS, Frydman J (2017) Mechanisms and functions of spatial protein quality control. Annu Rev Biochem 86:97–122 Specht S, Miller SB, Mogk A, Bukau B (2011) Hsp42 is required for sequestration of protein aggregates into deposition sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 195:617–629 Theodoridis PR, Bokros M, Marijan D, Balukoff NC, Wang D, Kirk CC, Budine TD, Goldsmith HD, Wang M, Audas TE, Lee S (2021) Local translation in nuclear condensate amyloid bodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ pnas. 20144 57118 Thiruvalluvan A, de Mattos EP, Brunsting JF, Bakels R, Serlidaki D, Barazzuol L, Conforti P, Fatima A, Koyuncu S, Cattaneo E, Vilchez D, Bergink S, Boddeke E, Copray S, Kampinga HH (2020) DNAJB6, a key factor in neuronal sensitivity to amyloidogenesis. Mol Cell. 78(2):346–358 Tyedmers J, Mogk A, Bukau B (2010) Cellular strategies for controlling protein aggregation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:777–788 Uversky VN (2017) Intrinsically disordered proteins in overcrowded milieu: membrane-less organelles, phase separation, and intrinsic disorder. Curr Opin Struct Biol 44:18–30 Uversky VN, Dunker AK (2010) Understanding protein non-folding. Biochim Biophys Acta 1804:1231–1264 Vabulas RM, Raychaudhuri S, Hayer-Hartl M, Hartl FU (2010) Protein folding in the cytoplasm and the heat shock response. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2(12):a004390 van Leeuwen W, Rabouille C (2019) Cellular stress leads to the formation of membraneless stress assemblies in eukaryotic cells. Traffic 20:623–638 Verghese J, Abrams J, Wang Y, Morano KA (2012) Biology of the heat shock response and protein chaperones: budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a model system. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76:115–158 Wallace EW, Kear-Scott JL, Pilipenko EV, Schwartz MH, Laskowski PR, Rojek AE, Katanski CD, Riback JA, Dion MF, Franks AM, Airoldi EM, Pan T, Budnik BA, Drummond DA (2015) Reversible, Specific, Active Aggregates of Endogenous Proteins Assemble upon Heat Stress. Cell 162:1286–1298 Walters RW, Muhlrad D, Garcia J, Parker R (2015) Differential effects of Ydj1 and Sis1 on Hsp70-mediated clearance of stress granules in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA 21:1660–1671 Wang M, Tao X, Jacob MD, Bennett CA, Ho JJD, Gonzalgo ML, Audas TE, Lee S (2018) Stress-induced low complexity RNA activates physiological amyloidogenesis. Cell Rep. 24(7):1713–1721 Yamamoto N, Maeda Y, Ikeda A, Sakurai H (2008) Regulation of thermotolerance by stress-induced transcription factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 7:783–790 Zander G, Krebber H (2017) Quick or quality? How mRNA escapes nuclear quality control during stress. RNA Biol 14:1642–1648 Zander G, Hackmann A, Bender L, Becker D, Lingner T, Salinas G, Krebber H (2016) mRNA quality control is bypassed for immediate export of stress-responsive transcripts. Nature 540:593–596 Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.