Recent advances on the innate immune response to Coxiella burnetii
Abstract
This research was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health with grants RC IZSSI 08/19 and RC IZSSI 01/20.
Full text
Recent Advances on the Innate Immune Response to Coxiella burnetii Guido Sireci 1 , Giusto Davide Badami 1 , Diana Di Liberto 1 , Valeria Blanda 2 *, Francesca Grippi 2 , Laura Di Paola 2 , Annalisa Guercio 2 , Jose ´de la Fuente 3,4 and Alessandra Torina 2 1 Central Laboratory of Advanced Diagnostic and Biological Research (CLADIBIOR), Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (BIND), University Hospital “Paolo Giaccone”, Università degli studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy, 2 Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia, Palermo, Italy, 3 SaBio Health and Biotechnology, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos, IREC -Spanish National Research Council CSIC - University of Castilla-La Mancha UCLM - Regional Government of Castilla-La Mancha JCCM, Ciudad Real, Spain, 4 Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States Coxiella burnetii is an obligate intracellular Gram-negative bacterium and the causative agent of a worldwide zoonosis known as Q fever. The pathogen invades monocytes and macrophages, replicating within acidic phagolysosomes and evading host defenses through different immune evasion strategies that are mainly associated with the structure of its lipopolysaccharide. The main transmission routes are aerosols and ingestion of fomites from infected animals. The innate immune system provides the first host defense against the microorganism, and it is crucial to direct the infection towards a self-limiting respiratory disease or the chronic form. This review reports the advances in understanding the mechanisms of innate immunity acting during C. burnetii infection and the strategies that pathogen put in place to infect the host cells and to modify the expression of specific host cell genes in order to subvert cellular processes. The mechanisms through which different cell types with different genetic backgrounds are differently susceptible to C. burnetii intracellular growth are discussed. The subsets of cytokines induced following C. burnetii infection as well as the pathogen influence on an inflammasome-mediated response are also described. Finally, we discuss the use of animal experimental systems for studying the innate immune response against C. burnetii and discovering novel methods for prevention and treatment of disease in humans and livestock. Keywords: Coxiella burnetii, innate immunity, Toll-like receptors, cytokine—immunological terms, inflammasome, autophagia, immunotherapeutics, experimental model INTRODUCTION Coxiella burnetii (order Legionellales) is an obligate intracellular Gram-negative bacterium (Dragan and Voth, 2020) that can be transmitted by aerosol with a very low infectious dose, as 1–10 viable organisms are sufficient to induce in humans an infection via the aerogenic route (Moos and Hackstadt, 1987;Sawyer et al., 1987;Gürtler et al., 2014). These characteristics, combined with the Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 11 | Article 7544551 Edited by: Luciana Balboa, Academia Nacional de Medicina, Argentina Reviewed by: Deepak B. Rawool, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, India Anja Lührmann, University Hospital Erlangen, Gernmany *Correspondence: Valeria Blanda [email protected] Specialty section: This article was submitted to Microbes and Innate Immunity, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology Received: 06 August 2021 Accepted: 12 October 2021 Published: 02 November 2021 Citation: Sireci G, Badami GD, Di Liberto D, Blanda V, Grippi F, Di Paola L, Guercio A, de la Fuente J and Torina A (2021) Recent Advances on the Innate Immune Response to Coxiella burnetii. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 11:754455. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.754455 REVIEW published: 02 November 2021 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.754455
stability in the environment, make C. burnetii a potential biological weapon (Oyston and Davies, 2011). C. burnetii can infect many species in addition to humans, and cattle, goats, and sheep are the main reservoirs (Van den Brom et al., 2015). In animals, infection by C. burnetii can be asymptomatic or it can cause problems on the reproductive sphere. Other manifestations include pneumonia and eye infections (Van den Brom et al., 2015). Humans can acquire the infection by inhalation of infected aerosol or after exposure to urine, feces, placenta, sperm, and vaginal secretions of infected animals. In addition, the disease can be developed after consuming infected raw milk (Dabaja et al., 2020), even if the link between infection and clinical disease in humans through consumption of unpasteurised milk and milk products is unclear (EFSA, 2010). Indeed, although milk may contain large amounts of C. burnetii, it is probably a minor route of Q fever acquisition (Maurin and Raoult, 1999;Gale et al., 2015). C. burnetii in humans causes Q fever, usually an acute illness (Waag, 2007;Marrie et al., 2015), but in some cases, it can become chronic (Tobin et al., 1982;Oyston and Davies, 2011). Coxiella burnetii life cycle comprehends the stages of Small Cell Variant (SCV) and Large Cell Variant (LCV). The first is the infectious stage, found in the environment and resistant to environmental stresses; it is characterized by the synthesis of molecular determinants of SCV differentiation. SCV development involves responses to protect against oxidative and nutritional stress (Sandoz et al., 2016). Some of these proteins are under the control of the alternative sigma factor RpoS, an essential regulator of stress responses and stationaryphase physiology in several bacterial species (Moormeier et al., 2019). These proteins are involved in regulating the remodeling of the peptidoglycan, in facilitating penetration of the cell envelope and promoting both intracellular and extracellular survival (Moormeier et al., 2019). Among them, cbu0419 gene encodes a peptidoglycan polysaccharide deacetylase (Caufrier et al., 2003), which renders the peptidoglycan resistant to lysozyme, reducing the release of cell wall fragments and thus the probability of detection by cytosolic immune cell sensors (Vollmer and Tomasz, 2000;Boneca et al., 2007;Davis and Weiser, 2011; Kaoukab-Raji et al., 2012). Another factor that is SCV-associated is enhC (cbu1136), whose function in C. burnetii is unknown, while in Legionella pneumophila, it is thought to aid intracellular replication by controlling lytic murein transglycosylase activity and reducing the subsequent release of peptidoglycan peptide fragments into the cytosol that might be recognized by the cytosolic innate immune system (Liu et al., 2012;Moreira and Zamboni, 2012). Another enzyme that is SCV-associated is the deacetylates Nacetylglucosamine of peptidoglycan, which in C. burnetii also encodes a lytic murein transglycosylase (CBU0925) that is also known to aid penetration of the cell envelope by large and complex structures (Scheurwater and Burrows, 2011). LCV is the metabolically active form, replicating efficiently in eukaryotic cells, distinguishable by the production of proteins involved in cell division and in intracellular survival (Marrie et al., 2015;Ammerdorffer et al., 2017). SCVs are ingested by the host macrophages and the vacuole containing the bacterium merges with lysosomes to form the phagolysosome (Figure 1). Here, SCV becomes LCV, which,in turn, convert back to SCVs (Colemanetal., 2004). During the infection, C. burnetii creates a favorable environment inside the cell host to escape from the immune response and to replicate successfully. In particular, C. burnetii presents a type IV secretion system (T4SS) essential for renovation of a lysosome into a mature Coxiella-containing vacuole (CCV) permissive of intracellular replication. This secretion system has both sequence homology and functional similarity to the defect in organelle trafficking/intracellular multiplication (Dot/Icm) apparatus of L. pneumophila, which is designated as the type IVB (T4BSS) and it is involved in creating a vacuole that evades rapid endocytic maturation and matures into an endoplasmic reticulumderived organelle that supports bacterial replication (Roy and Tilney, 2002). FIGURE 1 |Coxiella burnetii phagolysosome formation in the host macrophage and induced effector mechanisms involved in protection against the pathogen. Sireci et al. Innate Immune Response to Coxiella burnetii Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 11 | Article 7544552
Coxiella burnetii Dot/Icm T4SS consists primarily of bacterial membrane proteins that are assembled into the apparatus used to deliver effector proteins into the cytoplasm of the host cell. These effectors mediate the survival of the host cell and the development of CCV replicative compartment (Lührmann et al., 2017). The comprehension of the immune response elicited in the host by the pathogen is crucial to understand pathogen transmission, establishment and pathogenesis and for identifying novel checkpoints for pathogen control (Torina et al., 2020a). Innate immunity, in particular, causes a rapid and intense protection for the acute phase of infectious diseases. However, even if effector mechanisms of innate immune responses, displayed by host in short time, are able to inhibit symptoms in the acute infection phases, they do not usually contain the infection (Torina et al., 2020b). This review is focused on recent advances in the comprehension of innate immune mechanisms involved in protection against C. burnetii infection and the strategies elicited by the pathogen to invade the host cells and actively regulate the expression of specific host cell genes to subvert cellular processes. This information could be translated into new intervention for preventing, controlling, and improving Q fever symptoms. COXIELLA BURNETII LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE One of the major virulence factors of C. burnetii is the lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Functional interactions of LPSs and proteins have been thoroughly investigated by glycomics and proteomics studies and a role of this complex emerged not only in growth and development of the microorganism, but also in pathogenesis and immunity of Q fever (Seshadri et al., 2003; Thompson et al., 2003;Skultety et al., 2005;Samoilis et al., 2007; Toman et al., 2009). C. burnetii LPS is involved in immune evasion strategies since its peculiar structure leads to repressive effects on the defensive mechanisms of cells (Abnave et al., 2017). Wild-type C. burnetii strains possess a complex full-length LPS with typical O-chain saccharidic units that makes the bacterium virulent (it is the so-called phase I) (Hackstadt, 1986). Following repeated passage in chick embryo yolk sacs or in cell lines, i.e., in the absence of immune system intervention, C. burnetii wild-type strains convert to phase II and produce a phase II LPS determining the loss of virulence (Lukacova et al., 2008). Phase II LPS is easily eliminated by immune response in immunocompetent hosts (Hackstadt, 1990). This passage is accompanied by modifications in both composition and structure of the LPS macromolecule (Toman et al., 2009). LPS II shows a rough (R) structure, unlike LPS I, characterized by a smooth (S) aspect. Moreover, LPS II is characterized by a peculiar composition, which also includes the sugars virenose and dihydrohydroxystreptose, not present in other LPS and which are therefore representative of the C. burnetii LPS (Narasaki and Toman, 2012). Phase variation is also used in the diagnosis of Q fever since during acute Q fever, C. burnetii induces antibodies against phase II (protein antigens), while chronic Q fever, often manifested as endocarditis, is associated with the production of high titers of antibodies directed against phase I (LPS antigen) (Peacock et al., 1983). Truncated LPS is responsible for the avirulence of the Nine Mile phase II strain. Moreover, since phase I LPS of C. burnetii possesses low antigenic and immunogenic properties (Hitchcock et al., 1986), this LPS–protein complex is also used as a vaccine against Q fever. Though LPS I and LPS II are weak endotoxins, their ability to induce TNF-ahas been reported (Toman et al., 2009). In TNF-a and many other cytokines (IL1b, IL10, etc.), overproduction is involved (Dellacasagrande et al., 2000a)inC. burnetii survival inside the patient monocytes and may be related to specific inflammatory syndrome of Q fever endocarditis consisting of an increase in circulating TNF-awithout variations in cytokine antagonist (Capo et al., 1999a). TNF production did not directly reflect the virulence of C. burnetii strains since avirulent organisms induced TNF production. The overproduction of TNF stimulated by avirulent C. burnetii is probably related to the increase in bacterial binding to monocytes and not to the potency of their LPS (Dellacasagrande et al., 2000b), even considering that the interaction of avirulent variants with monocytes was dramatically more efficient than that of virulent organisms (Capo et al., 1999b). COXIELLA BURNETII INFECTION AND HOST CELL TOLL-LIKE RECEPTORS Most pathogens are initially recognized by the innate immune system through one or more Toll-like receptors (TLRs) (Medzhitov, 2007), a family of pattern recognition receptors present on macrophages and other cells acting in innate immunity. TLRs are able to recognize different microbial structures/patterns, thus intervening in the early immune responses to several etiologic agents (Ramstead et al., 2016). Their activity is often mediated by MyD88, which acts as an adapter involved in signal transduction (Janssens and Beyaert, 2002). Different studies investigated the role of TLR4 and TLR2 in C. burnetii infections (Honstettre et al., 2004;Zamboni et al., 2004; Meghari et al., 2005;Shannon et al., 2005). It was reported that phase I C. burnetii lacks the ability to stimulate TLR2 and TLR4 as a possible immune evasion strategy (Shannon et al., 2005). Moreover, it was reported that C. burnetii LPS is able to avoid the activation of p38a-MAPK through the TLR4 recruitment. In particular, the re-organization of the macrophage cytoskeleton by C. burnetii LPS disrupts the interaction between TLR-2 and TLR-4, which is necessary for TLRs signaling in case of recognition of pathogenic C. burnetii LPS. Blocking the actinmediated cytoskeleton re-organization was able to restore C. burnetii-induced TLR-2/TLR-4 association and the activation of p38a-MAPK (Conti et al., 2015). Sireci et al. Innate Immune Response to Coxiella burnetii Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 11 | Article 7544553
A study investigating the involvement of TLR2, TLR4, and MyD88 in pulmonary C. burnetii infection found a different role for these factors according to the site of infection. Indeed, TLR2 and TLR4 were not necessary to reduce the growth of the pathogen following peripheral infection and to elicit the inflammatory response in the lungs following pulmonary infection. However, they were able to limit bacterium replication in the lung and spleen when pulmonary infection occurred. Moreover, MyD88 was involved in the infectionrelated morbidity (Ramstead et al., 2016). Other factors involved in the innate immune response against microorganisms are nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain receptor 1 (NOD1), NOD2, and the mitogen-activated protein kinases. Inhibition of TLR2 and mitogen-activated protein kinasesaswellaspolymorphismsinTLR1andNOD2 decreased cytokine responses in C. burnetii–stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), confirming the important role of both TLR1/TLR2 heterodimer and NOD2 for cytokine response induction against C. burnetii in humans (Ammerdorffer et al., 2015). In a subsequent study, the same authors found that the absence of TLR10 resulted in increased cytokine responses following C. burnetii infection. Similarly, the occurrence of SNPs in TLR10 in healthy volunteers increased cytokine production upon C. burnetii stimulation, suggesting an inhibitory effect of TLR10 (Ammerdorffer et al., 2016). A different response of human TLR4 (hTLR4) and mouse TLR4 against differently hypo-acylated LPS has been reported. Since it is known that C. burnetii LPS is hypo-acylated and heavily glycosylated, a recent study investigated susceptibility to C. burnetii infection in mice expressing hTLR4. Although mice expressing hTLR4 and the human myeloid differentiation factor 2 (MD-2) adaptor protein showed a similar response with respect to wild-type mice, the authors observed differences in bacterial burdens in tissues and an increase in lung pathology in the first ones. An alteration of cytokine response was observed in hTLR4/MD2 mice, which showed the production of cytokines involved in myeloid cell recruitment accompanied by neutrophil recruitment to the lung. These responses were related to the subsequent observed increased bacterial load and worst pathology in the lung (Robison et al., 2019). MACROPHAGE ROLE IN C. BURNETII INFECTION Coxiella burnetii is able to apply several survival strategies to persist within myeloid cells by subverting their microbicidal activity (Ghigo et al., 2009). An interesting study reported the innate immune reactions of neutrophils and macrophages within the lungs elicited following an aerosol-mediated C. burnetii infection. These authors reported that both virulent C. burnetii Nine Mile phase I (NMI) and avirulent Nine Mile phase II (NMII) were able to infect neutrophils, but the infection was limited since a low infection rate was observed. In addition, a possible C. burnetii evasive strategy to infect macrophage emerged since neutrophils did not kill C. burnetii and the bacterium inside neutrophils was still able to infect and replicate within macrophages. An early neutrophil-mediated immune response against aerosolized C. burnetii was detected as SCID mice exposed to aerosolized C. burnetii showed a delay in the influx of neutrophils into the lungs, both in case of NMI and in case of NMII infection (Elliott et al., 2013). Human alveolar macrophages (hAMs) have been used as a model for defining novel innate immune responses to C. burnetii. These cells allowed the replication of C. burnetii in large, typical CCV, and in non-fused, atypical vacuole harboring replicating C. burnetii and recruiting lipid droplet. A functional type IV secretion system was necessary for the CCV formation and bacterial growth, suggesting production of effector proteins by C. burnetii able to control macrophage functions. Avirulent C. burnetii promoted the activation of pro-survival kinases, a shortterm phosphorylation of stress-related factors and a robust, early pro-inflammatory response through the secretion of TNF-aand IL-6. On the contrary, virulent isolates elicited reduced secretion of these cytokines. Finally, IFN-gtreatment of infected hAMs was able to control the intracellular replication of C. burnetii (Graham et al., 2013). Coxiella burnetii showed a limited ability of alveolar macrophage activation, as it was also supported by studies showing that the interactions between C. burnetii and the Ctype lectin surfactant protein D (SP-D), a member of the innate immune response in different mucosal surfaces and in the lungs, result in bacterial aggregation provoking pathogen killing and clearance. It was observed that SP-D is able to bind C. burnetii in a calcium-dependent manner, but no bacterial aggregation or bactericidal effects have been observed. SP-D interactions with C. burnetii decreased the infectivity of C. burnetii towards mouse alveolar macrophage cells, probably due to a significant reduction in its adherence and phagocytosis. However, SP-D does not alter classical activation of alveolar macrophages (Soltysiak et al., 2015). Coxiella burnetii phase II infection of primary murine alveolar macrophages (AMs) has been investigated in vitro (Fernandes et al., 2016), resulting in a pronounced M2 polarization of AMs and in the establishing of a highly permissive condition to C. burnetii multiplication in vitro. Murine AMs showed an increased susceptibility to infection in comparison to primary bone marrow-derived macrophages. Moreover, AMs from Nos2 or IFNgknockout (KO) mice were significantly more permissive than wild-type cells when cultured in the absence of IFNgand nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2). In contrast, AMs from Il4 - / - mice (in C57BL/6 mouse genetic background) were more restrictive to C. burnetii replication. These results showed that M2 polarization is relevant to elicit the permissiveness of AMs to C. burnetii replication (Fernandes et al., 2016). It was reported that C. burnetii NMII strain was able to replicate in both primary macrophages from C57BL/6J mice obtained differentiating bone marrow cells with recombinant murine macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) as well as in C57BL/6J myeloid progenitors immortalized with an estrogen-regulated Hoxb8 oncogene. These studies indicated Sireci et al. Innate Immune Response to Coxiella burnetii Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 11 | Article 7544554
that both these ex vivo models can be useful to investigate the interplay between Coxiella and macrophages (Cockrell et al., 2017). Coxiella burnetii infection was also analyzed in CD14 + macrophages collected from full-term placentas. The bacterium was detected in these macrophages after 4 h culture and was eliminated after 9 days. C. burnetii infection did not prevent placental macrophages from generating multinucleated giant cells, and it was able to induce an inflammatory profile, in particular stimulating IFN-gproduction. Indeed, C. burnetii clearance was clearly correlated to IFN-gproduction (Mezouar et al., 2019a). An involvement of mast cells (MCs) has been supposed in Q fever pathophysiology since a decrease in MC progenitor count was observed in Q fever patients together with an increase of serum tryptase levels, which are markers of MCs activation (Mezouar et al., 2019b). CYTOKINES IN Q FEVER Cytokines are proteins involved in immunity and inflammation, which are mainly produced by monocytes and lymphocytes in response to an immune insult. Since C. burnetii is an obligate intracellular pathogen, it causes alterations in host immune response to survive inside this cell, and the cytokine response is significantly affected by modifications induced by the bacterium (Amara et al., 2012). For example, PBMCs from patients affected by Q fever Fatigue Syndrome (QFS), a debilitating fatigue syndrome lasting 5 to 10 years or longer after the acute illness, showed increased IL-6 and IFN-gamma and reduced IL-2 levels compared to controls (Penttila et al., 1998). The role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of the acute and chronic Q fever and in the development of the QFS has been investigated. For instance, it has been hypothesized that cytokines may be responsible of persistent fever in patients affected by acute Q fever, which scarcely respond to antibiotic therapy (Lai et al., 2010). Moreover, serum levels of specific cytokines have been suggested as markers of acute or chronic Q fever. It has been proposed that acute C. burnetii infection may cause an epigenetic remodeling of the promoter regions of proinflammatory cytokine genes, which determines an impaired inflammatory response. In particular, QFS patients affected by frequent and severe infections in the upper respiratory tract show a reduced cytokine response, probably due to a long-term change in monocytes induced by C. burnetii (Raijmakers et al., 2019). Coxiella burnetii isolated from cattle induced higher levels of IL-1b,TNF-a, and IL-22 than bacteria isolated from goats, sheep, and chronic Q fever patients, which probably explains the low incidence of human outbreak associated with bovine disease. Cytokine responses depended on host origin more than on C. burnetii genotypes (Ammerdorffer et al., 2017). Moreover, viable C. burnetii induces lower levels of TNF-a, IL-1b, IL-6, and IL-10 but similar levels of IFN-g, IL-17, IL-22, and CXCL9 (IFN-g-dependent chemokine) compared to the heat-killed bacteria. In contrast, the adaptive response is similar in both cases (Jansen et al., 2018). In Q fever, IFN-gpromotes C. burnetii killing by the induction of TNF-mediated apoptosis in infected monocytes (Dellacasagrande et al., 1999;Dellacasagrande et al., 2002). In particular, IFN-gis significantly increased in acute but not in vascular chronic Q fever patients compared to people with past infection, whereas IL-18 shows a similar rise in both acute and chronic patients. The IFN-g-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) and the TGF-binstead are lower in patients affected by chronic vascular infection, suggesting that chronic patients had an impaired Type I immune response against C. burnetii (Pennings et al., 2015). Patients affected by chronic Q fever showed intact IFN-g response, so defects concerning this pathway are not involved in progression to chronic infection. Instead, since polymorphisms in the IL-12p40 gene are associated with chronic Q fever, the IL12/IFN-gpathway may play a role in this progression (Schoffelen et al., 2017). The QFS patients show similar levels of IFN-gand decreased IFN-g/IL-2 ratio compared to those affected by chronic Q fever. Symptom duration is positively correlated with IL-2 production and negatively correlated with the IFN-g/IL-2 ratio, suggesting an impaired cell-mediated response in QFS (Keijmel et al., 2016). Type I IFNs (IFN-a,b,k,w,t, and ϵ) and other interferons are important in immune response against C. burnetii (Snyder et al., 2017). IFN-aadministration at peritoneal level exacerbated disease, while at the lung level (site of infection), it reduced bacterial replication (Hedges et al., 2016). The negative impact of the peripheral delivery may be explained by the fact that type I IFNs reduce the inflammatory cytokine expression, whereas the beneficial effect of lung administration suggests that aerosolized type I IFNs may be an effective alternative to antibiotics to treat affected patients. There was also a report of an interaction between C. burnetii and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), which play a key role in antiviral immunity via the production of I IFNs. C. burnetii was able to stimulate pDCs increasing the expression of activation and migratory markers and upregulating genes encoding for pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and type I IFN. Type I IFN upregulation was related to the increase in IFN-arelease by C. burnetii-stimulated pDCs (Ka et al., 2016). Coxiella burnetii also stimulates IL-10 production, a cytokine crucial for bacterial replication inside of monocytes. The mechanism involved probably consists in monocyte deactivation mediated by TNF suppression. It has been suggested that IL-10 overproduction promotes progression to chronic Q fever (Ghigo et al., 2001). Monocytes from patients affected by Q fever endocarditis instead show increased TNF production, which is associated with impaired C. burnetii elimination (Dellacasagrande et al., 2000b). Other studies, conversely, reported that the production of TNF is required to restrict C. burnetii Nine Mile II replication within macrophages (Bradley et al., 2016). Q fever patients with hepatitis show serum cytokines levels higher than those affected by pneumonia or fever, and TNF and Sireci et al. Innate Immune Response to Coxiella burnetii Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 11 | Article 7544555
IL-10 are increased in patients with valvulopathy and extremely high in case of endocarditis. These observations indicate that acute Q fever is associated with cytokine overproduction and that TNF may be a marker of chronic evolution of Q fever (Honstettre et al., 2003). Besides, the activation marker of B cells sCD23 in Q fever endocarditis patients is significantly higher than in acute patients and controls, suggesting that it may be a marker of the Q fever endocarditis (Capo et al., 1999a). Serum levels of cytokines such as IFN-gand IL-6 may be helpful for distinguishing between past and chronic disease as well as for diagnosis of acute Q fever. For example, it has been observed that an IFN-g/IL-2 ratio > 11 is strongly suggestive for chronic Q fever (Schoffelen et al., 2014b). Likewise, in sheep, goats and she-camels, cytokines, acute phase proteins, and oxidative stress markers may be useful tools to diagnose the Q fever, since animals that aborted due to coxiellosis show a significant increase of the proinflammatory cytokines (El-Deeb et al., 2019). Finally, IFN-gand IL-10 serum levels in dairy cattle may be helpful to value the health status of seropositive animals and to monitor response to vaccine (Małaczewska et al., 2018). APOPTOSIS AND INFLAMMASOME IN COXIELLA BURNETII INFECTIONS Apoptosis is a programmed cell death process essential for the immune system homeostasis, acting also as a scavenger for damaged or infected cells (Byrne and Ojcius, 2004). Apoptosis can be triggered through two different pathways called the extrinsic and intrinsic pathway. In the first pathway, several ligands are involved, such as Fas Ligand (FasL) and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), their death receptors, and some adaptor proteins, which activate caspases (cysteinyl aspartate proteases). In the second pathway, the activation of the Bax group of proteins plays a crucial role. Their oligomerization leads to the permeabilization of the mitochondrial membrane, the resulting cytochrome crelease, and the activation of effector caspases (caspases 3, 6, and 7). In detail, caspase 3 induces robust proteolysis and chromatin fragmentation (Enari et al., 1998;Cory and Adams, 2002). Nowadays, it is well known that some pathogens are able to interfere positively or negatively withthe apoptotic process through different pathways, such as Chlamydia pneumoniae,Rickettsia rickettsii,andToxoplasma gondii. They act, for example, by degrading pro-apoptotic proteins, inducing the transcription of some genes encoding anti-apoptotic proteins or inhibiting the activation of the intrinsic pathway (Clifton et al., 1998;Byrne and Ojcius, 2004;Fischer et al., 2004;Carmen et al., 2006). C. burnetii, as other intracellular pathogens, need to hinder the apoptosis process to survive and to establish a favorable environment inside the host cell. It has been seen that cells infected by C. burnetii show different susceptibility to apoptosis depending on their type, stage of maturation, and surface receptors expressed (Schoenlaubetal.,2016).Forexample,infectionbyNMII C. burnetii in murine bone marrow neutrophils inhibits apoptosis (Cherla et al., 2018), whereas in peritoneal B1a cells from the same species, it induces cell death (Schoenlaub et al., 2016). Similarly, Zhang et al. (2012) obseved that in human monocytic THP-1 cells, early C. burnetii infection induces apoptosis by a caspaseindependent pathway involving translocation of Bcl-2-associated X protein (BAX) and Apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF),respectively, to the mitochondria and to the nucleus. The authors suggested that mantaining a certain level of apoptosis may be useful for C. burnetii to establish persistent infection. It has been seen that C. burnetii infection affects both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis pathway (Bisle et al., 2016;Cordsmeier et al., 2019). Some experimental evidences showed that C. burnetii inhibits the activation of the host cell apoptotic process preventing the release of cytochrome cand the subsequent activation of caspase 3/7, probably through the upregulation of A1/bfl-1 and c-IAP2 (Lührmann and Roy, 2007;Voth et al., 2007). Effectors needed to inhibit apoptosis are injected inside the host cell through the type IVB secretion system (T4BSS) (Lührmann et al., 2010). However, it is well known that microbial activation of TLRs in macrophages commonly leads to the induction of anti-apoptotic gene expression, suggesting that the C. burnetii could interfere with host cell survival through the activity of some specific bacterial protein produced upon the infection. Among the C. burnetii proteins involved in the anti-apoptotic process, AnkG, CaeA, and CaeB are the most studied. AnkG is a 388-amino acid protein that belongs to the Ankyrin repeat family and is capable of blocking the p32-mediated apoptosis pathway in mammalian cells (Lührmann et al., 2010). It has been seen that the amino terminal 1–69 region codify a domain that is both necessary and sufficient to interact with p32 and to inhibit the apoptosis, whereas truncated variants are not able to block apoptosis. Moreover, to prevent pathogen-induced cell death, AnkG needs to be localized in the nucleus (Eckart et al., 2014; Schäfer et al., 2017;Schäfer et al., 2020). CaeB is a T4BSS effector protein, which, in stressed mammalian cells, targets the endoplasmatic reticulum stress sensor IRE1, thereby inhibiting the ER stress-induced apoptosis. Due to its activity, CaeB is involved in pathogenity in vivo (Friedrich et al., 2021). In contrast to CaeB, CaeA affects both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis acting respectively on caspases and Fas pathways. An EK (glutamic acid/lysine) repetition motif is believed to be essential for CaeA anti-apoptotic activity (Bisle et al., 2016; Raghavan, 2016). Finally, apart from those mentioned above, another C. burnetii effector worth mentioning is IcaA, secreted, similarly to AnkG, CaeA, and CaeB, by the Dot/Icm type IV secretion system. This protein is responsible for caspase-11 inhibition and plays an important role in preventing pyroptosis, which is an inflammatory cell death pathway massively involved in infection control (Cunha & Zamboni, 2013;Cunha et al., 2015; Cordsmeier et al., 2019). In addition, C. burnetii, as well as other bacteria, implements several mechanisms to evade inflammasome activation and pyroptosis induction (Cunha and Zamboni, 2013). Sireci et al. Innate Immune Response to Coxiella burnetii Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 11 | Article 7544556
Inflammasome is a protein scaffold involved in modulation of caspase-1 and in the maturation of IL-1band IL-18 (Torina et al., 2020b). It is activated during infections by several pathogens, including Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, virus, fungi, and protozoa (Hayward et al., 2018;Scorpio et al., 2018). It is generally activated by different PathogenAssociated Molecular Patterns (PAMPs) or Damage-Associated MolecularPatterns(DAMPs)through various Nod-like receptors (NLRs), such as NLRP3. Inflammasome activation induces several processes, including the release of Caspase-1 active form. The protease allows pro-IL1b/pro-IL18 maturation and the release of active IL1band IL18 with pyroptotic, or inflammatory, cell death induction. Coxiella burnetii, as well as other bacteria, implements several mechanisms to evade inflammasome activation and pyroptosis induction (Cunha and Zamboni, 2013). For example, a study found that C. burnetii was able to prevent the non-canonical activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome mediated by caspase-11 in case of successive infection with other bacteria such as Escherichia coli or L. pneumophila. This activity was related to a novel C. burnetii gene (IcaA) codifying a protein interfering with caspase activation and with the non-canonical activation of the inflammasome mediated by caspase-11 (Cunha et al., 2015). Coxiella burnetii is not involved in caspase-1 activation, IL-1b secretion, or cell death during the in vitro infection of murine macrophages. Moreover, C. burnetii-infected cells have no evident NLRP3 or ASC (apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a carboxy-terminal caspase activation and recruitment domain [CARD]) foci, indicating its ability to avoid cytosolic detection. C. burnetii is not able to inhibit and instead potentiates Caspase-1-mediated cell death, upregulating pro-IL1b and priming NLRP3 inflammasomes via TLR2 and MyD88 signaling (Delaney et al., 2021). AUTOPHAGY Coxiella burnetii can subvert the autophagy process to obtain a better bacterial replication activity taking advantage of the host’s cellular response (Castrejon-Jimenez et al., 2015). It was argued that the autophagic compartments rich in nutrients (cell degradation products, small peptides, amino acids, etc.) such as those of the host cell autophagosomes, contribute to the conversion of SCV to LCV. Therefore, the morphogenesis and multiplication of the bacterium depend not only on the pH of the vacuoles, but also on the accessibility of nutrients (Gutierrez and Colombo, 2005;Colombo et al., 2006). The role of the bacterial Dot/Icm type IV secretion system, through which C. burnetii translocates effector substrates from the bacterial cytosol directly into the cytosol of the host eukaryotic cell, has been investigated. Translocated effectors are involved in the pathogenesis mechanisms and therefore in the progression of infection. Through these effectors, C. burnetii modulates several cellular activities in order to maintain the infection. These activities include apoptosis suppression, lipid metabolism, and membrane trafficking alteration, gene transcription modification through the interaction of these effectors directly with targets in the nucleus, etc. (van Schaik et al., 2013). One of these proteins is Cig2, also known as vacuolar protein B (CvpB) (Martinez et al., 2016). This C. bunetii effector interacts with phosphoinositides on host cell membranes and manipulates phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate metabolism for optimal Coxiella-containing vacuole (CCV) development, promoting the fusion between autolysosomes and CCV and maintaining it in an autolysosomal stage. This allows distinguishing the CCV from the other vacuoles containing other pathogenic bacteria, which become targets of the host’s defensive pathway. This is a mechanism through which C. bunetii is able to subvert the host phagocytosis pathway in its favor, influencing the host’s immune response (Kohler and Roy, 2015). Another study reported that GTPases of the Rho family have an important role in C. burnetii phagocytosis. More specifically, the active forms of the members of the Rho family RhoA, Cdc42, and Rac1 are involved in the entry of C. burnetii into the host cell, regulating the rearrangement of actin, necessary for the internalization process. The authors also showed that the effectors of RhoA mDia1 and ROCK are involved in the signal transduction mechanism, which favors the entry of C. burnetii (Salinas et al., 2015). A recent study identified host proteins required for Dot/Icm effector translocation and for endocytic trafficking of the C. burnetii-containing vacuole to the lysosome. Moreover, many of the lysosomal proteins contribute to the virulence of C. burnetii, including the lysosomal serine protease TPP1. This tripeptidyl peptidase 1, also known as CLN2, is selectively transported to the lysosome by a lysosomal receptor, where it generates tripeptides from degraded proteins within the lysosome (Qian et al., 2008). The authors demonstrated that C. burnetii is capable of detecting specific amino acids present in lysosomes and of upregulating gene expression required for the activity of the Dot/Icm system itself (Newton et al., 2020). A role also for galectin proteins, b-galactoside-binding lectins involved in many biological processes (Blanda et al., 2020), has been reported. Galectin-3, -8, and -9 monitor bacteria vacuolar rupture, and endosomal and lysosomal loss of membrane integrity through binding of host glycans exposed in the cytoplasm after membrane damage (Mansilla Pareja et al., 2017). Moreover, vacuoles containing C. burnetii are characterized by a reversible recruitment of members of the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) and the interference with this recruitment reduces intravacuolar bacterial replication (Radulovic et al., 2018). INNATE IMMUNITY IN CHRONIC Q FEVER Patients affected by Q fever usually recover entirely through antimicrobial therapy or even without any treatment, but in less than 5% of cases they develop chronic infection, a serious disease difficult to treat (a minimum of 18 months of antimicrobial therapy is required). Endocarditis and vascular infection are the Sireci et al. Innate Immune Response to Coxiella burnetii Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 11 | Article 7544557
most frequent clinical manifestations that can be lethal if untreated (Mazokopakis et al., 2010). Moreover, patients returning from C. burnetii acute infection can develop a chronic fatigue syndrome (Wildman et al., 2002;Morroy et al., 2016). Mechanisms involved in the establishment of chronic infection are unknown, but it has been suggested that the chronicity may be due to a specific immune deficiency (e.g., lack of IFN-g) and not to a general immunodeficiency. Pregnant women, people affected by heart valve disorders, and cancer patients are most at risk to develop chronic infection. Several studies focused on the role of the immune response, and defects in both innate and adaptive immunity have been linked to the risk of developing the disease (Capo and Mege, 2012). For example, it was reported that monocytes from patients with chronic Q fever in evolution, who do not control the infection, exhibited defective phagosome maturation and impaired C. burnetii killing. Both responses were restored in patients recovering from Q fever. A significant correlation was reported between phagosome maturation and C. burnetii killing. Defective phagosome maturation and impaired C. burnetii killing were induced by interleukin (IL)-10 addition to monocytes from convalescent patients and were restored by IL-10 neutralization in chronic Q fever in evolution (Ghigo et al., 2004). The defective granuloma formation, an ineffective high level of TNF, a lack of antimicrobial activity of monocytes, and the failure of T-cell response are other examples of anomalies that appear involved in the chronic infection establishment. Genetically modified mice overexpressing IL-10 have been used as a model to analyze the role of IL-10 in chronic Q fever development. It has been demonstrated that IL-10 overproduction suppresses the microbicidal pathway (NO synthase and inflammatory cytokines), making the macrophages incapable of killing C. burnetii. This altered immune response causes sustained C. burnetii burden in tissues, high levels of antibody, and impaired granuloma formation, which are typical of the chronic Q fever (Meghari et al., 2008). Some studies (Marmion et al., 2009;Sukocheva et al., 2010) performed by inoculating SCID mice with samples (bone marrow, PBMC, or heart valve) coming from Q fever patients showed the persistence of the so-called “Immunomodulatory complex”(IMC)evenafteralongtimeawayfromacute infection. This is composed by non-infective and nonbiodegraded Coxiella cell components, including C. burnetii antigens, specificLPS,andtracesofgenomicDNA.The persistence of the IMC involve the capacity to pass repeatedly into the macrophages, and it induces an abnormal immune response, which may explain the development of chronic sequelae as the long fatigue syndrome after the acute infection in some patients. Th-1 and IFN-gresponse is another aspect that has become crucial to control acute C. burnetii infection. The development of the chronic Q fever reflects indeed its failure, whereas the antibody response seems less important (Eldin et al., 2017). The IFN-ginducible chemokine CXCL9 is higher in sera from chronic Q fever patients than in people healed from C. burnetii infection, and so it has been proposed as a chronic Q fever biomarker (Jansen et al., 2017a). Even genetics host factors have a role in chronic Q fever progression. For example, SNPs in genes crucial for phagolysosome maturation, bacterial killing, and autophagy are involved in higher or decreased susceptibility to chronic Q fever (Jansen et al., 2019). A further example can be found in the genes coding for matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Coxiella burnetii in fact induces their overexpression, contributing to the onset of chronic Q fever. Moreover, SNPs in MMP genes are more common in patients affected by chronic infection than in healthy people, so they can be considered as a risk factor (Jansen et al., 2017b). Persistent infection by C. burnetii is a serious problem also for animal health. Affected Cows, sheep, and goats indeed show reproductive troubles, which result in economic damage for the farmers. In cattle, chronic Q fever often causes ipofertility, endometritis, and low birth weight, whereas goats and sheep show more frequent abortion and premature delivery. In another study (De Biase et al., 2018), the correlation between C. burnetii infection and reproductive problems in cows was proven through the detection of the bacterium inside the uterine macrophages of cattle affected by chronic endometritis and low fertility and PCR and aerobic culture negative for other pathogens. In addition, another important problem relating to affected animals is that they expel C. burnetii through milk, feces, vaginal mucus, and birth products, which are vehicles for spreading the infection between the livestock and to the humans. Cattle, goats, and sheep are indeed considered as the most important reservoirs for the human infection (Georgiev et al., 2013; Pouquet et al., 2020). NEW IMMUNOTHERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS IN EXPERIMENTAL MODELS OF C. BURNETII INFECTIONS Model organisms and cell culture are relevant for understanding complex biological mechanisms, as the immune response and the interaction between pathogen and host (Metters et al., 2019). Animals belonging to invertebrates, small mammals, and nonhuman primates have been used to analyze the interaction between C. burnetii and host cell, the course of disease, and the role of innate and adaptive immunity against the infection (Bewley, 2013)(Table 1). The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is susceptible to C. burnetii phase II and it develops acute infection. The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is susceptible to C. burnetii phase II; the infection can be induced by injection and it can cause mortality, which in females is dose-dependent (Bastos et al., 2017). Larvae of the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella, have been used as a Sireci et al. Innate Immune Response to Coxiella burnetii Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 11 | Article 7544558
TABLE 1 | Experimental models and results of C. burnetii infection. Experimental model Purpose Infection route Effect Ref. Caenorhabditis elegans To investigate the role of the host innate immunity Feeding Exposure to live bacterium caused clear pathologic effects (as intestinal distension and anal deformation) on C. elegans No problems after exposure to the killed bacterium Some mutants C. elegans showed reduced lifespan or slighter infection signs Battisti et al., 2017 Drosophila melanogaster To investigate the role of the host innate immune response and of the Coxiella type 4 secretion system (T4SS) in Q fever pathogenesis Injection D. melanogaster lacking in Eiger, a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily homolog in Drosophila, less susceptible to the infection and Coxiella-infected flies exhibit reduced mortality from infection. Coxiella T4SS is critical for the formation of the Coxiella-containing vacuole and establishment of infection in Drosophila. Bastos et al., 2017 Galleria mellonella To investigate susceptibility to infection with both C. burnetii NMI and NMII. To characterize the role of the type 4 secretion system in C. burnetii NMII Injection G. mellonella susceptible to lethal infection with C. burnetii without significant difference in virulence between C. burnetii NMI and NMII strains. C. burnetii induce dose-dependent killing of G. mellonella. Dot/Icm type 4 secretion system (T4SS) is required for C. burnetii NMII virulence. Norville et al., 2014 Galleria mellonella To identify virulence genes of C. burnetii NMII Injection Coxiella strains exhibit various levels of pathogenicity for G. mellonella. Tetracycline increased the mean time to death and decreased the lethal effect of Coxiella strains. Selim et al., 2018 Galleria mellonella To study the intracellular growth and identify potential virulence factors. To map the transcriptome of C. burnetii during the infection Injection C. burnetii replicate in G. mellonella hemocytes and occupy a vacuole similar to the CCV seen in infected mammalian phagocytes. Identification of genes significantly upregulated or downregulated at different days postinfection. KovacsSimon et al., 2020 Ixodes scapularis To characterize host–pathogen interactions In vitro using IDE8 cells Development of an in vitro model Herrin et al., 2011 Inbred laboratory mice To evaluate susceptibility of inbred mice to infection by phase I C. burnetii Inoculated intraperitoneally Resistant, of intermediate sensitivity, and sensitive inbred mice were identified. Among the susceptible ones, BALB/c mice were infectable and showed signs of disease, A/J mice had the highest mortality rate Scott et al., 1987 IFN-gknockout mice, BALB/c, Toll-like receptor 2 knockout mice and C57BL/6 To verify if avirulent C. burnetii NM II could elicit disease in immunodeficient mice Inoculated intraperitoneally Fever and splenomegaly in immunodeficient mice, minimal symptoms in immunocompetent mice. Immunodeficient mice were protected against secondary infection: possible use of NMII for vaccine development against C. burnetii OchoaReparaz et al., 2007 My-D88-deficient mice To study early C. burnetii infection and prevention of infection spreading In vitro infection of bone marrowderived macrophages MyD88-dependent signaling is essential for early control of C. burnetii infection and to prevent systemic dissemination. Kohl et al., 2019 BALB/cJ Mice To study Q fever in pregnancy. Inoculated intraperitoneally Elevated bacterial load in the placenta, associated with still birth, perinatal death and high abortion rate, decreased birth rate Baumgärtner and Bachmann, 1992 Female BALB/c To investigate manifestations of perinatal Q fever Intraperitoneal infection Persistent infection associated with abortion and perinatal death, increased risk of endocarditis in pregnant mice Stein et al., 2000 Mice overexpressing IL-10 To clarify the role of host immune response in chronic Q fever Intraperitoneal and intratracheal routes Alteration in granuloma formation, elevated antibodies levels, and marked C. burnetii load in the tissue, consistent with human chronic infection characteristics Meghari et al., 2008 C57/BL6 mice To investigate the role of sex hormones in the pathogenesis of C. burnetii infection. Injected intraperitoneally C. burnetii load and granuloma numbers reduced in females. Ovarectomized mice increased presence of bacterium and granuloma, to a male similar level. Ovarectomized mice treated with 17bestradiol reduced both bacteria and granuloma numbers Leone et al., 2004 Guinea pigs To investigate the pathophysiologic features of Q fever. Inoculated intraperitoneally Liver, spleen, heart, and lungs were the most affected organs; granulomas detected in liver and spleen, infiltrations of mononuclear cells detected in lung alveoli and in the heart. No valvular damage found, except for animals with formerly electrocoagulated heart valves Heggers et al., 1975 Inbred strains of mice, and outbred guinea pigs To investigate the susceptibility to C. burnetii infection Several routes Guinea pigs more susceptible with respect to mice, which showed more diffused lesions. Scott et al., 1978 (Continued) Sireci et al. Innate Immune Response to Coxiella burnetii Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 11 | Article 7544559
Le, J., Lin, J. X., Henriksen-DeStefano, D., and Vilcek, J. (1986). Bacterial Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Interferon-Gamma Production: Roles of Interleukin 1 and Interleukin 2. J. Immunol. 136 (12), 4525–4530. Leone, M., Honstettre, A., Lepidi, H., Capo, C., Bayard, F., and Raoult D and Mege, J. L. (2004). Effect of Sex on Coxiella burnetii Infection: Protective Role of 17beta-Estradiol. J. Infect. Dis. 189, 339–345. doi: 10.1086/380798 Liu, M., Haenssler, E., Uehara, T., Losick, V. P., Park, J. T., and Isberg, R. R. (2012). The Legionella Pneumophila EnhC Protein Interferes With Immunostimulatory Muramyl Peptide Production to Evade Innate Immunity. Cell Host Microbe 12, 166 –1176. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.06.004 Long, C. M., Beare, P. A., Cockrell, D. C., Fintzi, J., Tesfamariam, M., Shaia, C. I., et al. (2021). Contributions of Lipopolysaccharide and the Type IVB Secretion System to Coxiella burnetii Vaccine Efficacy and Reactogenicity. NPJ Vaccines 6 (1):38. doi: 10.1038/s41541-021-00296-6 Lührmann, A., Newton, H. J., and Bonazzi, M. (2017). Beginning to Understand the Role of the Type IV Secretion System Effector Proteins in Coxiella burnetii Pathogenesis. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 413, 243–268. doi: 10.1007/9783-319-75241-9_10 Lührmann, A., Nogueira, C. V., Carey, K. L., and Roy, C. R. (2010). Inhibition of Pathogen-Induced Apoptosis by a Coxiella burnetii Type IV Effector Protein. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.107 (44), 18997–19001. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.1004380107 Lührmann, A., and Roy, C. R. (2007). Coxiella burnetii Inhibits Activation of Host Cell Apoptosis Through a Mechanism That Involves Preventing Cytochrome C Release From Mitochondria. Infect. Immun. 75 (11), 5282–5289. doi: 10.1128/ IAI.00863-07 Lukacova, M., Barak, I., and Kazar, J. (2008). Role of Structural Variations of Polysaccharide Antigens in the Pathogenicity of Gram-Negative Bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 14, 200–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01876.x Mahapatra, S., Ayoubi, P., and Shaw, E. I. (2010). Coxiella burnetii Nine Mile II Proteins Modulate Gene Expression of Monocytic Host Cells During Infection. BMC Microbiol. 10, 244. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-244 Małaczewska, J., Kaczorek-Łukowska, E., Szymanska-Czerwinska, M., Rękawek, W., Wojcik, R., Niemczuk, K., et al. (2018). Early Cytokine Response After Vaccination With Coxiella burnetii Phase I in an Infected Herd of Dairy Cattle. J. Vet. Res. 62, 469–476. doi: 10.2478/jvetres-2018-0076 Mansilla Pareja, M. E., Bongiovanni, A., Lafont, F., and Colombo, M. I. (2017). Alterations of the Coxiella burnetii Replicative Vacuole Membrane Integrity and Interplay With the Autophagy Pathway. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 7, 112. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00112 Marmion, B. P., Ormsbee, R. A., Kyrkou, M., Wright, J., Worswick, D. A., Izzo, A. A., et al. (1990). Vaccine Prophylaxis of Abattoir-Associated Q Fever: Eight Years’Experience in Australian Abattoirs. Epidemiol. Infect. 104 (2), 275–287. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800059458 Marmion, B. P., Sukocheva, O., Storm, P. A., Lockhart, M., Turra, M., Kok, T., et al (2009). Q Fever: Persistence of Antigenic Non-Viable Cell Residues of Coxiella burnetii in the Host–Implications for Post Q Fever Infection Fatigue Syndrome and Other Chronic Sequelae. QJM 102, 673–684. doi: 10.1093/ qjmed/hcp077 Marrie, T. J., Minnick, M. F., Textoris, J., Capo, C., and Mege, J. L. (2015). “Coxiella,”in In Molecular Medical Microbiology (Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U. S. A.), 1941–1972. Martinez, E., Allombert, J., Cantet, F., Lakhani, A., Yandrapalli, N., Neyret, A., et al. (2016). Coxiella burnetii Effector CvpB Modulates Phosphoinositide Metabolism for Optimal Vacuole Development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113 (23), E3260–E3269. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522811113 Maurin, M., and Raoult, D. (1999). Q Fever. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12, 518–553. doi: 10.1128/CMR.12.4.518 Mazokopakis, E. E., Karefilakis, C. M., and Starakis, I. K. (2010). Q Fever Endocarditis. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets 10, 27–31. doi: 10.2174/ 187152610790410918 Medzhitov, R. (2007). TLR-Mediated Innate Immune Recognition. Semin. Immunol. 19, 1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.02.001 Meekelenkamp, J. C., Schneeberger, P. M., Wever, P. C., and Leenders, A. C. (2012). Comparison of ELISA and Indirect Immunofluorescent Antibody Assay Detecting Coxiella burnetii IgM Phase II for the Diagnosis of Acute Q Fever. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 31 (6), 1267–1270. doi: 10.1007/ s10096-011-1438-0 Meghari, S., Bechah, Y., Capo, C., Lepidi, H., Raoult, D., Murray, P. J., et al. (2008). Persistent Coxiella burnetii Infection in Mice Overexpressing IL-10: An Efficient Model for Chronic Q Fever Pathogenesis. PloS Pathog. 4, e23. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0040023 Meghari, S., Honstettre, A., Lepidi, H., Ryffel, B., Raoult, D., and Mege, J. L. (2005). TLR2 is Necessary to Inflammatory Response in Coxiella burnetii Infection. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1063, 161–166. doi: 10.1196/annals.1355.025 Metters, G., Norville, I. H., Titball, R. W., and Hemsley, C. M. (2019). From Cell Culture to Cynomolgus Macaque: Infection Models Show Lineage-Specific Virulence Potential of Coxiella burnetii. J. Med. Microbiol. 68, 1419–1430. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001064 Mezouar, S., Benammar, I., Boumaza, A., Diallo, A. B., Chartier, C., Buffat, C., et al. (2019a). Full-Term Human Placental Macrophages Eliminate Coxiella burnetii Through an IFN-gAutocrine Loop. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2434. doi: 10.3389/ fmicb.2019.02434 Mezouar, S., Morel, V., Leveille, L., Resseguier, N., Chartier, C., Raoult, D., et al. (2019b). Progenitor Mast Cells and Tryptase in Q Fever. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 64, 159–162. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2019.03.011 Miller, H. E., Hoyt, F. H., and Heinzen, R. A. (2019). Replication of Coxiella burnetii in a Lysosome-Like Vacuole Does Not Require Lysosomal Hydrolases. Infect. Immun. 87 (11), e00493–e00419. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00493-19 Moormeier, D. E., Sandoz, K. M., Beare, P. A., Sturdevant, D. E., Nair, V., Cockrell, D. C., et al. (2019). Coxiella burnetii RpoS Regulates Genes Involved in Morphological Differentiation and Intracellular Growth. J. Bacteriol. 201 (8), e00009–e00019. doi: 10.1128/JB.00009-19 Moos, A., and Hackstadt, T. (1987). Comparative Virulence of Intraand Interstrain Lipopolysaccharide Variants of Coxiella burnetii in the Guinea Pig Model. Infect. Immun. 55, 1144–1150. doi: 10.1128/iai.55.5.1144-1150.1987 Moreira, L. O., and Zamboni, D. S. (2012). NOD1 and NOD2 Signaling in Infection and Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 3, 328. doi: 10.3389/ fimmu.2012.00328 Morgan, J. K., Luedtke, B. E., and Shaw, E. I. (2010). Polar Localization of the Coxiella burnetii Type IVB Secretion System. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 305 (2), 177–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01926.x Mori, M., Mertens, K., Cutler, S. J., and Santos, A. S. (2017). Critical Aspects for Detection of Coxiella burnetii. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 17, 33–41. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2016.1958 Morroy, G., Keijmel, S. P., Delsing, C. E., Bleijenberg, G., Langendam, M., Timen, A., et al. (2016). Fatigue Following Acute Q-Fever: A Systematic Literature Review. PloS One 11, e0155884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155884 Narasaki, C. T., and Toman, R. (2012). Lipopolysaccharide of Coxiella burnetii. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 984, 65–90. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4315-1_4 Natale, A., Bucci, G., Capello, K., Barberio, A., Tavella, A., Nardelli, S., et al. (2012). Old and New Diagnostic Approaches for Q Fever Diagnosis: Correlation Among Serological (CFT, ELISA) and Molecular Analyses. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 35, 375–379. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2012.03.002 Newton, P., Thomas, D. R., Reed, S. C. O., Lau, N., Xu, B., Ong, S. Y., et al. (2020). Lysosomal Degradation Products Induce Coxiella burnetii Virulence. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.117 (12), 6801–6810. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.1921344117 Nooroong, P., Trinachartvanit, W., Baimai, V., Anuracpreeda, P., and Ahantarig, A. (2021). Partial DnaK Protein Expression From Coxiella-Like Endosymbiont of Rhipicephalus Annulatus Tick. PloS One 16, e0249354. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0249354 Norville, I. H., Hartley, M. G., Martinez, E., Cantet, F., Bonazzi, M., and Atkins, T. P. (2014). Galleria Mellonella as an Alternative Model of Coxiella burnetii Infection. Microbiology (Reading) 160 (Pt 6):1175–1181. Ochoa-Reparaz, J., Sentissi, J., Trunkle, T., Riccardi, C., and Pascual, D. W. (2007). Attenuated Coxiella burnetii Phase II Causes a Febrile Response in Gamma Interferon Knockout and Toll-Like Receptor 2 Knockout Mice and Protects Against Reinfection. Infect. Immun. 75, 5845–5858. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00901-07 OIE (2018). “Q Fever. Chapter 3.1.16 [WWW Document],”in OIE Terr. Man. Paris, France. Available at: https://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_ standards/tahm/3.01.16_Q_FEVER.pdf. Omsland, A., Beare, P. A., Hill, J., Cockrell, D. C., Howe, D., Hansen, B., et al. (2011). Isolation From Animal Tissue and Genetic Transformation of Coxiella burnetii Are Facilitated by an Improved Axenic Growth Medium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77 (11), 3720–3725. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02826-10 Sireci et al. Innate Immune Response to Coxiella burnetii Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 11 | Article 75445516
Omsland, A., Cockrell, D. C., Howe, D., Fischer, E. R., Virtaneva, K., Sturdevant, D. E., et al. (2009). Host Cell-Free Growth of the Q Fever Bacterium Coxiella burnetii.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 (11), 4430–4434. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.0812074106 Oyston, P. C. F., and Davies, C. (2011). Q Fever: The Neglected Biothreat Agent. J. Med. Microbiol. 60, 9–21. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.024778-0 Peacock, M. G., Philip, R. N., Williams, J. C., and Faulkner, R. S. (1983). Serological Evaluation of Q Fever in Humans: Enhancedphase I Titers of Immunoglobulins G and A Arediagnostic for Q Fever Endocarditis. Infect. Immun. 41, 1089–1098. doi: 10.1128/iai.41.3.1089-1098.1983 Pennings, J. L., Kremers, M. N., Hodemaekers, H. M., Hagenaars, J. C., Koning, O. H., Renders, N. H., et al. (2015). Dysregulation of Serum Gamma Interferon Levels in Vascular Chronic Q Fever Patients Provides Insights Into Disease Pathogenesis. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 22, 664–671. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00078-15 Penttila, I. A., Harris, R. J., Storm, P., Haynes, D., Worswick, D. A., and Marmion, B. P. (1998). Cytokine Dysregulation in the Post-Q-Fever Fatigue Syndrome. QJM 91 (8), 549–560. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/91.8.549 Piel, L. M. W., Durfee, C. J., and White, S. N. (2021). Proteome-Wide Analysis of Coxiella burnetii for Conserved T-Cell Epitopes With Presentation Across Multiple Host Species. BMC Bioinf. 22, 296. doi: 10.1186/s12859-021-04181-w Pouquet, M., Bareille, N., Guatteo, R., Moret, L., and Beaudeau, F. (2020). Coxiella burnetii Infection in Humans: To What Extent do Cattle in Infected Areas Free From Small Ruminants Play a Role? Epidemiol. Infect. 148, e232. doi: 10.1017/ S0950268820001880 Qian, M., Sleat, D. E., Zheng, H., Moore, D., and Lobel, P. (2008). Proteomics Analysis of Serum From Mutant Mice Reveals Lysosomal Proteins Selectively Transported by Each of the Two Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptors. Mol. Cell Proteomics 7 (1), 58–70. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700217-MCP200 Radulovic, M., Schink, K. O., Wenzel, E. M., Nähse, V., Bongiovanni, A., Lafont, F., et al. (2018). ESCRT-Mediated Lysosome Repair Precedes Lysophagy and Promotes Cell Survival. EMBO J. 37, e99753. doi: 10.15252/embj.201899753 Raghavan, R. (2016). A Repeat Motif on a Coxiella Effector Protein Facilitates Apoptosis Inhibition. Virulence 7:369–71. doi: 10.1080/21505594. 2016.1156834 Raijmakers, R. P. H., Koeken, V. A. C. M., Jansen, A. F. M., Keijmel, S. P., Roerink, M. E., Joosten, L. A. B., et al. (2019). Cytokine Profiles in Patients With Q Fever Fatigue Syndrome. J. Infect. 78, 349–357. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.01.006 Ramstead, A. G., Robison, A., Blackwell, A., Jerome, M., Freedman, B., Lubick, K. J., et al. (2016). Roles of Toll-Like Receptor 2 (TLR2), TLR4, and MyD88 During Pulmonary Coxiella burnetii Infection. Infect. Immun. 84, 940–949. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00898-15 Reeves, P. M., Paul, S. R., Sluder, A. E., Brauns, T. A., and Poznansky, M. C. (2017). Q-Vaxcelerate: A Distributed Development Approach for a New Coxiella burnetii Vaccine. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 13, 2977–2981. doi: 10.1080/ 21645515.2017.1371377 Robison, A., Snyder, D. T., Christensen, K., Kimmel, E., Hajjar, A. M., Jutila, M. A., et al. (2019). Expression of Human TLR4/myeloid Differentiation Factor 2 Directs an Early Innate Immune Response Associated With Modest Increases in Bacterial Burden During Coxiella burnetii Infection. Innate Immun. 25, 401– 411. doi: 10.1177/1753425919855420 Roy, C. R., and Tilney, L. G. (2002). The Road Less Traveled: Transport of Legionella to the Endoplasmic Reticulum. J. Cell Biol. 158 (3), 415–419. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200205011 Ruiz, S., and Wolfe, D. N. (2014). Vaccination Against Q Fever for Biodefense and Public Health Indications. Front. Microbiol. 5, 726. doi: 10.3389/ fmicb.2014.00726 Sahu, R., Rawool, D. B., Vinod, V. K., Malik, S. V. S., and Barbuddhe, S. B. (2020). Current Approaches for the Detection of Coxiella burnetii Infection in Humans and Animals. J. Microbiol. Methods 179, 106087. doi: 10.1016/ j.mimet.2020.106087 Salinas, R. P., Ortiz Flores, R. M., Distel, J. S., Aguilera, M. O., Colombo, M. I., and Beron, W. (2015). Coxiella burnetii Phagocytosis Is Regulated by GTPases of the Rho Family and the RhoA Effectors Mdia1 and ROCK. PloS One 10 (12), e0145211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145211 Samoilis, G., Psaroulaki, A., Vougas, K., Tselentis, Y., and Tsiotis, G. (2007). Analysis of Whole Cell Lysate From the Intercellular Bacterium Coxiella burnetii Using Two Gel-Based Protein Separation Techniques. J. Proteome Res. 6 (8), 3032–3041. doi: 10.1021/pr070077n Sandoz, K. M., Popham, D. L., Beare, P. A., Sturdevant, D. E., Hansen, B., Nair, V., et al. (2016). Transcriptional Profiling of Coxiella burnetii Reveals Extensive Cell Wall Remodeling in the Small Cell Variant Developmental Form. PloS One 11, e0149957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149957 Sandoz,K.M.,Sturdevant,D.E.,Hansen,B.,andHeinzen,R.A.(2014). Developmental Transitions of Coxiella burnetii Grown in Axenic Media. J. Microbiol. Methods 96, 104–110. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.11.010 Sawyer, L. A., Fishbein, D. B., and McDade, J. E. (1987). Q Fever: Current Concepts. Rev. Infect. Dis. 9 (5), 935–946. doi: 10.1093/clinids/9.5.935 Schäfer, W., Eckart, R. A., Schmid, B., Cagköylü, H., Hof, K., Muller, Y. A., et al. (2017). Nuclear Trafficking of the Anti-Apoptotic Coxiella burnetii Effector Protein AnkG Requires Binding to P32 and Importin-a1. Cell. Microbiol. 19 (1):10.1111/cmi.12634. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12634 Schäfer, W., Schmidt, T., Cordsmeier, A., Borges, V., Beare, P. A., Pechstein, J., et al. (2020). The Anti-Apoptotic Coxiella burnetii Effector Protein AnkG Is a Strain Specific Virulence Factor. Sci. Rep. 10 (1), 15396. doi: 10.1038/s41598020-72340-9 Scheurwater, E. M., and Burrows, L. L. (2011). Maintaining Network Security: How Macromolecular Structures Cross the Peptidoglycan Layer. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 318, 1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02228.x Schneeberger, P. M., Hermans, M. H., van Hannen, E. J., Schellekens, J. J., Leenders, A. C., and Wever, P. C. (2010). Real-Time PCR With Serum Samples Is Indispensable for Early Diagnosis of Acute Q Fever. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 17 (2), 286–290. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00454-09 Schoenlaub, L., Cherla, R., Zhang, Y., and Zhang, G. (2016). Coxiella burnetii Avirulent Nine Mile Phase II Induces Caspase-1-Dependent Pyroptosis in Murine Peritoneal B1a B Cells. Infect. Immun. 84, 3638–3654. doi: 10.1128/ IAI.00694-16 Schoffelen, T., Herremans, T., Sprong, T., Nabuurs-Franssen, M., Wever, P. C., Joosten, L. A., et al. (2013). Limited Humoral and Cellular Responses to Q Fever Vaccination in Older Adults With Risk Factors for Chronic Q Fever. J. Infect. 67 (6), 565–573. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2013.08.008 Schoffelen, T., Sprong, T., Bleeker-Rovers, C. P., Wegdam-Blans, M. C., Ammerdorffer, A., Pronk, M. J., et al. (2014b). A Combination of InterferonGamma and Interleukin-2 Production by Coxiella burnetii-Stimulated Circulating Cells Discriminates Between Chronic Q Fever and Past Q Fever. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 20, 642–650. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12423 Schoffelen, T., Textoris, J., Bleeker-Rovers, C. P., Ben Amara, A., van der Meer, J. W., Netea, M. G., et al. (2017). Intact Interferon-gResponse Against Coxiella burnetii by Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Chronic Q Fever. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 23, 209.e9-209.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.11.008 Schoffelen, T., Wong, A., Rumke, H. C., Netea, M. G., Timen, A., van Deuren, M., et al. (2014a). Adverse Events and Association With Age, Sex and Immunological Parameters of Q Fever Vaccination in Patients at Risk for Chronic Q Fever in the Netherlands 2011. Vaccine 32 (49), 6622–6630. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.061 Scholzen, A., de Vries, M., Duerr, H. P., Roest, H. J., Sluder, A. E., Poznansky, M. C., et al. (2021). Whole Blood Interferon G Release Is a More Sensitive Marker of Prior Exposure to Coxiella burnetii Than Are Antibody Responses. Front. Immunol. 12, 701811. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.701811 Scorpio, D. G., Choi, K. S., and Dumler, J. S. (2018). Anaplasma PhagocytophilumRelated Defects in CD8, NKT, and NK Lymphocyte Cytotoxicity. Front. Immunol. 9, 710. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00710 Scott, G. H., Burger, G. T., and Kishimoto, R. A. (1978). Experimental Coxiella burnetii Infection of Guinea Pigs and Mice. Lab. Anim. Sci. 28, 673–675. Scott, G. H., Williams, J. C., and Stephenson, E. H. (1987). Animal Models in Q Fever: Pathological Responses of Inbred Mice to Phase I Coxiella burnetii. J. Gen. Microbiol. 133, 691–700. doi: 10.1099/00221287-133-3-691 Selim, A., Yang, E., Rousset, E., Thiery, R., and Sidi-Boumedine, K. (2018). Characterization of Coxiella burnetii Strains From Ruminants in a Galleria Mellonella Host-Based Model. New Microbes New Infect. 24, 8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2018.02.008 Seshadri, R., Paulsen, I. T., Eisen, J. A., Read, T. D., Nelson, K. E., Nelson, W. C., et al. (2003). Complete Genome Sequence of the Q-Fever Pathogen Coxiella burnetii.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (9), 5455–5460. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.0931379100 Shannon, J. G., Howe, D., and Heinzen, R. A. (2005). Virulent Coxiella burnetii Does Not Activate Human Dendritic Cells: Role of Lipopolysaccharide as a Sireci et al. Innate Immune Response to Coxiella burnetii Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 11 | Article 75445517
Shielding Molecule. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 8722–8727. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.0501863102 Skultety, L., Hernychova, L., Toman, R., Hubalek, M., Slaba, K., Zechovska, J., et al. (2005). Coxiella burnetii Whole Cell Lysate Protein Identification by Mass Spectrometry and Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1063, 115–122. doi: 10.1196/annals.1355.019 Snyder, D. T., Hedges, J. F., and Jutila, M. A. (2017). Getting "Inside" Type I IFNs: Type I IFNs in Intracellular Bacterial Infections. J. Immunol. Res. 2017, 9361802. doi: 10.1155/2017/9361802 Soltysiak,K.A.,vanSchaik,E.J.,andSamuel,J.E.(2015).SurfactantProteinDBinds to Coxiella burnetii and Results in a Decrease in Interactions With Murine Alveolar Macrophages. PloS One 10 (9), e0136699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136699 Stein, A., Lepidi, H., Mege, J. L., Marrie, T. J., and Raoult, D. (2000). Repeated Pregnancies in BALB/c Mice Infected With Coxiella burnetii Cause Disseminated Infection, Resulting in Stillbirth and Endocarditis. J. Infect. Dis. 181, 188–194. doi: 10.1086/315166 Sukocheva, O. A., Marmion, B. P., Storm, P. A., Lockhart, M., Turra, M., and Graves, S. (2010). Long-Term Persistence After Acute Q Fever of NonInfective Coxiella burnetii Cell Components, Including Antigens. QJM 103, 847–863. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq113 Tennenberg, S. D., and Weller, J. J. (1996). Endotoxin Activates T Cell InterferonGamma Secretion in the Presence of Endothelium. J. Surg. Res. 63 (1), 73–76. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1996.0225 Thompson, H. A., Hoover, T. A., Vodkin, M. H., and Shaw, E. I. (2003). Do Chromosomal Deletions in the Lipopolysaccharide Biosynthetic Regions Explain All Cases of Phase Variation in Coxiella burnetii Strains? Update. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 990, 664–670. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07441.x Tobin, M. J., Cahill, N., Gearty, G., Maurer, B.,Blake, S., Daly, K., et al. (1982). Q Fever Endocarditis. Am. J. Med. 72, 396–400. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90495-8 Toman, R., Skultety, L., and Ihnatko, R. (2009). Coxiella burnetii Glycomics and Proteomics–Tools for Linking Structure to Function. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1166, 67–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04512.x Torina, A., Blanda, V., Villari, S., Piazza, A., La Russa, F., Grippi, F., et al. (2020a). Immune Response to Tick-Borne Hemoparasites: Host Adaptive Immune Response Mechanisms as Potential Targets for Therapies and Vaccines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 8813. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228813 Torina, A., Naranjo, V., Pennisi, M. G., Patania, T., Vitale, F., Laricchiuta, P., et al. (2007). Serologic and Molecular Characterization of Tickborne Pathogens in Lions (Panthera leo) From the Fasano Safari Park, Italy. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 38 (4), 591–593. doi: 10.1638/2007-0043R1.1 Torina, A., Villari, S., Blanda, V., Vullo, S., La Manna, M. P., Shekarkar Azgomi, M., et al. (2020b). Innate Immune Response to Tick-Borne Pathogens: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Induced in the Hosts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 5437. doi: 10.3390/ijms21155437 Van den Brom, R., van Engelen, E., Roest, H. I., van der Hoek, W., and Vellema, P. (2015). Coxiella burnetii Infections in Sheep or Goats: An Opinionated Review. Vet. Microbiol. 181, 119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.07.011 van Schaik, E. J., Chen, C., Mertens, K., Weber, M. M., and Samuel, J. E. (2013). Molecular Pathogenesis of the Obligate Intracellular Bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11, 561–573. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3049 Varela-Castro, L., Zuddas, C., Ortega, N., Serrano, E., Salinas, J., Castellà, J., et al. (2018). On the Possible Role of Ticks in the Eco-Epidemiology of Coxiella burnetii in a Mediterranean Ecosystem. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 9, 687–694. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.02.014 Vollmer, W., and Tomasz, A. (2000). The pgdA Gene Encodes for a Peptidoglycan N-Acetylglucosamine Deacetylase in Streptococcus Pneumoniae. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 20496–20501. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M910189199 Voth, D. E., and Heinzen, R. A. (2007). Lounging in a Lysosome: The Intracellular Lifestyle of Coxiella burnetii. Cell Microbiol. 9, 829–840. doi: 10.1111/j.14625822.2007.00901.x Voth, D. E., Howe, D., and Heinzen, R. A. (2007). Coxiella burnetii Inhibits Apoptosis in Human THP-1 Cells and Monkey Primary Alveolar Macrophages. Infect. Immun. 75 (9), 4263–4271. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00594-07 Waag, D. M. (2007). Coxiella burnetii: Host and Bacterial Responses to Infection. Vaccine 25, 7288–7295. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.08.002 Waag, D. M., England, M. J., Tammariello, R. F., Byrne, W. R., Gibbs, P., Banfield, C. M., et al. (2002). Comparative Efficacy and Immunogenicity of Q Fever Chloroform:Methanol Residue (CMR) and Phase I Cellular (Q-Vax) Vaccines in Cynomolgus Monkeys Challenged by Aerosol. Vaccine 20, 2623–2634. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00176-7 Wegdam-Blans, M. C., Tjhie, H. T., Korbeeck, J. M., Nabuurs-Franssen, M. N., Kampschreur, L. M., Sprong, T., et al. (2014). Serology in Chronic Q Fever Is Still Surrounded by Question Marks. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 33 (7), 1089–1094. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2048-4 Wegdam-Blans, M. C., Wielders, C. C., Meekelenkamp, J., Korbeeck, J. M., Herremans, T., Tjhie, H. T., et al. (2012). Evaluation of Commonly Used Serological Tests for Detection of Coxiella burnetii Antibodies in Well-Defined Acute and Follow-Up Sera. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 19 (7), 1110–1115. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05581-11 Wildman, M. J., Smith, E. G., Groves, J., Beattie, J. M., Caul, E. O., and Ayres, J. G. (2002). Chronic Fatigue Following Infection by Coxiella burnetii (Q Fever): Ten-Year Follow-Up of the 1989 UK Outbreak Cohort. QJM 95, 527–538. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/95.8.527 Woc-Colburn, A. M., Garner, M. M., Bradway, D., West, G., D’Agostino, J., Trupkiewicz, J., et al. (2008). Fatal Coxiellosis in Swainson’s Blue Mountain Rainbow Lorikeets (Trichoglossus Haematodus Moluccanus). Vet. Pathol. 45, 247–254. doi: 10.1354/vp.45-2-247 Zamboni, D. S., Campos, M. A., Torrecilhas, A. C., Kiss, K., Samuel, J. E., Golenbock, D. T., et al. (2004). Stimulation of Toll-Like Receptor 2 by Coxiella burnetii Is Required for Macrophage Production of ProInflammatory Cytokines and Resistance to Infection. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 54405–54415. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410340200 Zhang, Y., Zhang, G., Hendrix, L. R., Tesh, V. L., and Samuel, J. E. (2012). Coxiella burnetii Induces Apoptosis During Early Stage Infection via aCaspaseIndependent Pathway in Human Monocytic THP-1 Cells. PloS One 7 (1), e30841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030841 Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Publisher’s Note: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher. Copyright © 2021 Sireci, Badami, Di Liberto, Blanda, Grippi, Di Paola, Guercio, de la Fuente and Torina. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. Sireci et al. Innate Immune Response to Coxiella burnetii Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 11 | Article 75445518