scieee Open visual document viewer

Large-scale GWAS identifies multiple loci for hand grip strength providing biological insights into muscular fitness

Willems, S M,Wright, D J,Day, F R,Lyytikäinen, Leo-Pekka,Kähönen, Mika,Lehtimäki, Terho

Full text

ARTICLE Recei ed 13 Ma 2017 |Accep ed 22 May 2017 |Published 12 Jul 2017 La ge-scale GWAS iden ifies mul iple loci o hand g ip s eng h p o iding biological insigh s in o muscula fi ness Sa a M. Willems e al.# Hand g ip s eng h is a widely used p oxy o muscula fi ness, a ma ke o ail y, and p edic o o a ange o mo bidi ies and all-cause mo ali y. To in es iga e he gene ic de e - minan s o a ia ion in g ip s eng h, we pe o m a la ge-scale gene ic disco e y analysis in a combined sample o 195,180 indi iduals and iden i y 16 loci associa ed wi h g ip s eng h (Po5108) in combined analyses. A numbe o hese loci con ain genes implica ed in s uc u e and unc ion o skele al muscle fib es (ACTG1), neu onal main enance and signal ansduc ion (PEX14, TGFA, SYT1), o monogenic synd omes wi h in ol emen o psycho- mo o impai men (PEX14, LRPPRC and KANSL1). Mendelian andomiza ion analyses a e consis en wi h a causal e ec o highe gene ically p edic ed g ip s eng h on lowe ac u e isk. In conclusion, ou findings p o ide new biological insigh in o he mechanis ic unde - pinnings o g ip s eng h and he causal ole o muscula s eng h in age- ela ed mo bidi ies and mo ali y. Co espondence and eques s o ma e ials should be add essed o R.S. (email: obe .sco @m c-epid.cam.ac.uk) o o N.W. (email: nick.wa eham@m c-epid.cam.ac.uk). #A ull lis o au ho s and hei a filia ions appea s a he end o he pape . DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 OPEN NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:16015 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions 1 Muscle s eng h, measu ed by isome ic hand g ip s eng h, is an accessible and widely used p oxy o muscula fi ness. Lowe g ip s eng h is associa ed wi h impai ed quali y o li e in olde adul s, and is an es ablished ma ke o ail y, p edic ing physical decline and unc ional limi a ion in daily li ing1–3. The alue o g ip s eng h as a clinical p edic o o ac u e isk has been demons a ed in di e en popula ions4,5, and highe g ip s eng h has been ound o be p ognos ic o walking eco e y a e hip ac u e su ge y in la e li e6. G ip s eng h has also been shown o p edic ca dio ascula disease (CVD) and all-cause mo ali y o e many yea s o ollow-up7–9. Whils i emains unclea whe he hese p ospec i e associa ions wi h ac u e isk, CVD and mo ali y a e causal—o eflec ea ly mani es a ion o unde lying disease p ocesses— he ole o muscula s eng h as a p edic o o unc ional capaci y highligh s he impo ance o unde s anding i s ae iology. G ip s eng h is highly he i able (h2¼30–65%)10–12. Whils candida e gene app oaches ha e implica ed mul iple loci in his pheno ype, including he mogenic and myogenic ac o s13,14, he e emain ew obus ly eplica ed associa ions. Two genome- wide associa ion s udies in up o 27,000 indi iduals ha e been epo ed o da e15,16, yielding one in e genic genome-wide significan associa ion16. He e, in a combined sample size o 195,180 indi iduals, including 142,035 indi iduals om he UK Biobank (UKB) coho 17, we iden ified 16 genome-wide significan loci associa ed wi h g ip s eng h. We also pe o med Mendelian andomiza ion (MR) analyses, which showed no e idence o causali y in he associa ions o g ip s eng h wi h CVD o all-cause mo ali y, bu we e sugges i e o a causal e ec o muscula s eng h on ac u e isk. Resul s Mul iple no el loci a e associa ed wi h g ip s eng h.Ins age one analyses, we es ed he associa ion o 417 million a ian s (mino allele equency (MAF)40.1%, impu a ion quali y 40.4), in 142,035 whi e Eu opean indi iduals om UK Biobank (Supplemen a y Table 1) wi h maximal g ip s eng h. Genome-wide single-nucleo ide a ian (SNV) he i abili y was es ima ed a 23.9% (SE 2.7%). Twen y-one loci showed genome-wide significan asso- cia ions (Po5108) in s age one (Supplemen a y Fig. 1), and we e subsequen ly ollowed up in s age wo analyses o up o 53,145 indi iduals om 8 addi ional s udies (Supplemen a y Table 1; Supplemen a y No e) including he Coho s o Hea and Aging Resea ch in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) conso ium16. Twel e loci we e independen ly eplica ed (di ec ional consis ency wi h s age one, Po0.05) in s age wo coho s (Supplemen a y Table 2A) and 16 loci con ained genome-wide significan associa ions (Po5108) in combined analyses. E ec sizes on g ip s eng h anged om 0.14 o 0.42kg pe allele unde an addi i e model (Table 1; Supplemen a y Fig. 1; Supplemen a y Table 2A and B). Gi en he disco dance in sample size be ween s age one and wo analyses, and in he in e es s o maximizing powe , we conside ed he e o be e idence o associa ion a any locus eaching genome-wide significance in combined analyses, and pu sued all 16 in downs eam analyses. Lead SNVs a he 16 g ip s eng h-associa ed loci included common a ian s (MAFZ5%) in o nea POLD3,TGFA,ERP27,HOXB3,GLIS1,PEX14,MGMT, LRPPRC, SYT1, GBF1, KANSL1, SLC8A1, IGSF9B, ACTG1, alow- equency a ian (MAF 3%) in DEC1, and a u he common a ian alling wi hin he human leukocy e an igen (HLA) egion (Table 1; Supplemen a y Fig. 2). App oxima e condi ional analyses iden ified no addi ional signals a genome-wide significance a hese 16 loci a e condi ioning on hei espec i e lead SNVs. A wo loci, we saw e idence o a depa u e om addi i i y (Po3.13 103 unde a dominance de ia ion model (see Me hods)); a he GBF1 locus, we saw e idence o a dominan e ec o he g ip s eng h- aising A allele (P domde ¼2.3 103;Supplemen a yFig.3A),and a he SYT1 locus, we saw e idence o a ecessi e e ec o he g ip s eng h- aising A allele (P domde ¼3.0 103;Supplemen a y Fig. 3B). No indi idual a ian s showed significan e ec modifica ion by age o sex (Supplemen a y Table 2C and D). The associa ion o he 16 SNV gene ic sco e (modelled as he sum o he g ip s eng h-inc easing allele dosage a each SNV pe indi idual) showed no in e ac ion wi h age (P in e ac ion ¼0.30), bu was s onge in men han in women (men: b¼0.20 kg pe g ip s eng h-inc easing allele, P¼2.38 1048;women: b¼0.13 kg pe g ip s eng h-inc easing allele, P¼3.61 10 43; P in e ac ion ¼1.56 105;Fig.1;Supplemen a yTable2CandD). Age a ec ui men was independen o s eng h-inc easing allele Table 1 | Associa ion o he six een loci eaching genome-wide significance in combined analyses. S age one (UKB)wS age wo coho s Combined sID Gene* All. EAF E ec zS.E. P- alue E ec zS.E. P- alue E ec zS.E. P- alue N s958685 TGFA A/C 0.52 0.154 0.026 2.8 1090.164 0.04 3.8 1050.157 0.022 4.8 10 13 191,754 s72979233 POLD3 A/G 0.76 0.210 0.03 3.7 1012 0.112 0.041 5.8 10 30.175 0.024 5.0 1013 192,490 s11614333 ERP27 C/T 0.62 0.181 0.027 5.0 1011 0.117 0.04 3.5 1030.16 0.023 1.6 1012 195,154 s2288278 HOXB3 A/G 0.66 0.162 0.027 3.0 1090.147 0.04 2.8 10 40.157 0.023 3.8 1012 195,133 s4926611 GLIS1 C/T 0.64 0.173 0.027 1.3 1010 0.115 0.041 5.1 1030.156 0.023 4.8 10 12 192,964 s6687430 PEX14 G/A 0.46 0.15 0.026 7.6 1090.124 0.04 1.7 1030.142 0.022 5.6 10 11 195,176 s10186876 LRPPRC A/G 0.36 0.162 0.027 2.7 10 90.113 0.041 6.2 10 30.147 0.023 9.8 1011 192,490 s374532236 MGMT T/C 0.38 0.157 0.027 5.5 1090.121 0.042 4.2 1030.147 0.023 1.1 10 10 189,701 s10861798 SYT1 A/G 0.43 0.145 0.026 4.3 1080.159 0.047 7.4 1040.148 0.023 1.3 1010 189,160 s78325334 HLA T/C 0.84 0.228 0.038 2.4 10 90.113 0.05 0.024 0.186 0.03 9.6 10 10 193,127 s2273555 GBF1 A/G 0.61 0.153 0.027 9.1 1090.096 0.041 0.019 0.136 0.022 1.1 109191,754 s80103986 KANSL1 A/T 0.81 0.201 0.033 1.8 1090.098 0.052 0.059 0.171 0.028 1.2 10 9193,090 s2110927 SLC8A1 C/T 0.27 0.161 0.029 4.4 10 80.098 0.045 0.029 0.142 0.025 7.7 109192,490 s6565586 ACTG1 A/T 0.25 0.169 0.03 2.2 10 80.096 0.064 0.14 0.156 0.027 1.2 108187,072 s72762373 DEC1 A/G 0.03 0.424 0.078 4.9 10 80.359 0.255 0.16 0.418 0.074 1.8 10 8152,162 s34845616 IGSF9B A/G 0.25 0.168 0.03 1.7 10 80.07 0.049 0.15 0.141 0.025 2.7 108189,666 All, alleles (e ec /o he ); EAF, e ec allele equency; HLA, HLA egion; N, sample size; UKB, UK Biobank. Resul s a e so ed by combined s age one þs age wo P- alue. *Nea es gene o he lead SNP. wS age one analyses include 142,035 pa icipan s. zE ec es ima es a e in kg pe allele and co espond o he fi s allele shown. ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 2NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:16015 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions dosage a each o he 16 SNVs om combined analyses. Equally, allele equency a each SNP was no p edic ed by age, sugges ing ha he e is no selec ion o alleles by age a hese loci18.Wedidno eplica e he p e iously- epo ed associa ion a s752045 wi h g ip s eng h16 (bpe mino allele (95% confidence in e al (CI))¼0.01 (0.06, 0.08), P¼0.75). A numbe o associa ed loci con ained genes wi h biologically plausible oles in s eng h and neu omuscula fi ness, h ough e ec s on he s uc u e and unc ion o skele al muscle (ACTG1), exci a ion-con ac ion coupling (SLC8A1), e idence o neu o- ophic oles (TGFA), o in ol emen in he egula ion o neu o ansmission (SYT1). ACTG1 (Ac in, g1A) encodes a key componen o he cos ame e—a p o ein complex localized o he Z-disc o skele al muscle which physically e he s myofib ils o he cell memb ane and ansmi s con ac ile o ce gene a ed a he sa come e o he ex acellula ma ix ia he dys ophin glycop o- ein complex (DGC)19,20. Monogenic loss o elemen s o he DGC esul s in muscula dys ophies21, whils Ac g1 knockou mice display o e muscle weakness, p og essi e myopa hy and dec eased isome ic wi ch o ce22.SLC8A1 encodes a ansmemb ane Naþ/Ca2þexchange which is i al o es o ing Ca2þconcen a ion o p e-exci a ion le els in exci able cells. Muscle-specific o e exp ession o SLC8A1 has been shown o induce dys ophy-like skele al muscle pa hology23. Synap o agmin- 1, encoded by SYT1, is an in eg al synap ic memb ane p o ein which egula es Ca2þ-dependen neu o ansmi e elease a he p esynap ic e minal24, and is implica ed in de elopmen o neu omuscula junc ion pa hology in oden models o spinal muscula a ophy25.TGFA encodes ans o ming g ow h ac o alpha, a well-cha ac e ized g ow h ac o which plays a key neu o ophic ole in he cen al and pe iphe al ne ous sys ems26, and is up egula ed du ing he acu e inju y esponse o mo o neu ons, p omo ing neu onal su i al27,28. Th ee lead a ian s o g ip s eng h map in o nea genes implica ed in monogenic synd omes cha ac e ized by neu ological and/o psychomo o impai men (Table 1; Supplemen a y Fig. 2). s10186876 (P combined ¼9.75 1011)lies15kbups eamo LRPPRC (leucine- ich pen aco ipep ide-con aining), which has been implica ed in he F ench-Canadian a ian o Leigh Synd ome (MIM: 220111), a cy och ome C oxidase deficiency wi h ea u es including de elopmen al delay, hypo onia and weakness29. Mu a ions in PEX14 (Pe oxisomal Biogenesis Fac o 14) (in onic lead a ian s6687430) unde lie ce ain o ms o Zellwege Spec um Pe oxisomal Biogenesis Diso de (MIM: 614887), a synd ome cha ac e ized by absence o unc ional pe oxisomes and sys emic neu ological impai men 30. Finally, s80103986 is in onic in KANSL1, which has been implica ed in he complex impai ed-psychomo o pheno ype o Koolen-de V ies synd ome (MIM: 610443)31. Fu he , he signal a KANSL1 is in a la ge linkage disequilib ium (LD) block also con aining MAPT ( s754512, P disco e y ¼3.7 108), which encodes he mic o ubule-associa ed au p o ein. MAPT has been implica ed in a sui e o so-called auopa hies cha ac e ized by p og essi e neu ological defici , and is also a isk locus o Pa kinson’s disease32. 17q21.31 has a complex haplo ype s uc u e comp ising an in e sion and h ee s uc u al copy numbe a ian s a ising om duplica ion e en s, which has p e iously been shown o be o ele ance o heal h33. A e impu ing he nine common s uc u al haplo ypes a his locus33–35, haplo ype was significan ly associa ed wi h g ip s eng h. In pa icula , he in e ed haplo ype was associa ed wi h lowe s eng h (b¼0.17 kg, P¼3.85106), independen o age, sex, heigh and BMI (Supplemen a y Table 3A). This associa ion appea ed o be d i en by he in e ed a2.g2 s uc u al a ian (b¼0.18kg, P¼1.24105). In sensi i i y analyses, we e- es ed associa ions o he 16 g ip s eng h a ian s in UKB a e exclusion o up o 8,676 indi iduals wi h ype 1 diabe es, cance , o o he p e alen disease wi h po en ial o influence muscle s eng h. No loci showed significan a enua ion o e ec ela i e o o e all analyses (Supplemen a y Table 3B and C). Signals a e en iched o biologically ele an issues. To iden i y en ichmen o associa ion signals ac oss di e en issues and iden i y likely e ec o issues, we pe o med cell ype-specific pa i ioned he i abili y36 analyses on genome-wide associa ion esul s om he disco e y phase. A e adjus men o mul iple es ing ac oss nine dis inc issue ypes (Po0.0056), we obse ed significan en ichmen s o associa ions wi h g ip s eng h in issue-specific egula o y egions o a numbe o issues, including bone/connec i e issue (P¼2.03 1010), skele al muscle (P¼1.88 109) and he CNS (P¼7.37 10 8). En ichmen s a weake le els o s a is ical significance we e also obse ed in ca dio ascula and gas oin es inal issue, as well as he ad enal/panc eas axis, and ‘o he ’ issues (Supplemen a y Fig. 4). In eg a ion o gene exp ession da a. Guided by issue-specific en ichmen s, we sough o iden i y pu a i e e ec o ansc ip s unde lying hese associa ions by in es iga ing associa ions o lead SNVs o hei p oxies ( 240.8) wi h ansc ip le els in b ain, ibial ne e and skele al muscle in GTEx (Supplemen a y Table 4). The g ip s eng h-inc easing allele a ACTG1 ( s6565586) was S a a n <50 yea s 50–60 yea s 37,543 50,326 23,991 Be a (95% CI) P- alue 4.00 × 10–24 1.91 × 10–24 4.47 × 10–44 2.38 × 10–48 3.61 × 10–43 0.19 (0.15, 0.23) 0.15 (0.12, 0.17) 0.17 (0.14, 0.19) 0.20 (0.18, 0.23) 0.13 (0.11, 0.15) 53,090 58,770 Be a (kg pe g ip s eng h-inc easing allele) –0.10 –0.05 0.00 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.300.200.10 >60 yea s Male Female Figu e 1 | Associa ion o he 16 SNV g ip s eng h sco e wi h g ip s eng h by age and sex s a a. Associa ion o he g ip s eng h-inc easing gene ic sco e showed no in e ac ion wi h obse ed g ip s eng h by age (p in e ac ion ¼0.30) bu was s onge in men han in women (P in e ac ion ¼1.56 105)ina subse o 111,860 un ela ed UK Biobank pa icipan s om s age one analyses. Associa ions shown a e om linea eg ession. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:16015 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions 3 associa ed wi h lowe exp ession o ACTG1 in skele al muscle (P EXP-Lead ¼3.81 1013,P EXP-Bes eQTL ¼2.64 10 13, 2¼0.85), coun e odi ec ionssugges edbyac g1 knockou in mouse. A LRPPRC ( s10186876), he s eng h-inc easing allele was associa ed wi h highe LRPPRC exp ession le els in ce ebellum (P EXP-Lead ¼6.35 107,P EXP-Bes eQTL ¼9.35 108, 2¼0.93) and ce ebella hemisphe e (P EXP-Lead ¼1.29 106, P EXP-Bes eQTL ¼3.62 108, 2¼1.00), which appea s di ec ionally conco dan wi h p e iously cha ac e ized loss o unc ion and o he wise damaging mu a ions associa ed wi h he disease pheno ype o F ench-Canadian Leigh Synd ome37. A s1161433 (ERP27 locus), he g ip s eng h-inc easing allele was associa ed wi h highe le els o MGP exp ession in ibial ne e (P EXP-Lead ¼5.90 1010, P EXP-Bes eQTL ¼2.19 1012, 2¼0.84). MGP (Ma ix Gla P o ein) is a well-cha ac e ized inhibi o o ascula issue and ca ilage calcifica ion, and consequen lyac sasakey egula o o bone o ma ion38. We also pe o med in eg a ed ansc ip ome-wide analyses using ecen ly-desc ibed Me aXcan39 and SMR app oaches40. Accoun ing o 5973 independen exp ession p obes (Bon e oni- co ec ed P 8.37 106 o a 0.05), and po en ial coinciden al o e lap o eQTL signals wi h GWAS loci, SMR analyses using whole blood ansc ip ome da a41 sugges ed co ela ion be ween highe g ip s eng h and lowe exp ession le els o ERP27 (P SMR ¼2.50 109)andKANSL1 (P SMR ¼3.05 107), bo h o which a e implica ed genes om ou GWAS analysis. Me aXcan analysis iden ified 25 p o ein-coding ansc ip s implica ed in g ip s eng h a Bon e oni-co ec ed significance in a leas one o wel e biologically ele an issues om he GTEx esou ce (neu onal, muscle, connec i e, and ogenic issues and whole blood; Supplemen a y Table 5). T ansc ip s showed conco dan ly al e ed exp ession ac oss a numbe o hese candida e issue ypes (Fig. 2). Fo LRPPRC, o example, we obse ed associa ion o highe exp ession le els ac oss a numbe o b ain issue ypes, ibial ne e, whole blood and es is, wi h highe g ip s eng h. Highe MAPT exp ession in mul iple b ain egions known o be implica ed in mo o coo dina ion (co ex, ce ebellum and ce ebella hemisphe e) was also associa ed wi h highe g ip s eng h. Pa hways unde lying a ia ion in g ip s eng h. Hypo hesis- ee gene se en ichmen analysis (GSEA) based on gene-se s o common unc ional anno a ion, o belonging o p e-defined canonical pa hways (Supplemen a y Table 6A and B), indica ed fi e- old en ichmen o associa ion in/nea genes implica ed in ‘posi i e egula ion o p o ein ca abolic p ocess’ (gene on ology (GO): 1903364, alse disco e y a e (FDR) ¼0.026), and nominal en ichmen o associa ions nea genes implica ed in ‘dual excision epai in global genomic nucleo ide excision epai ’ (Reac ome: R-HSA-5696400, FDR ¼0.047). Gi en he iden ifi- ca ion o es ablished psychomo o disease loci amongs index a ian s o g ip s eng h, we addi ionally in e oga ed ou associa ion esul s o en ichmen o genes known o be implica ed in monogenic myopa hies and dys ophies (Suppleme- n a y Table 6B). G ip s eng h associa ions we e nominally en iched in he myopa hy-linked gene se (P¼0.017), bu no a loci implica ed in dys ophic condi ions (P¼0.47). Insigh s in o o e lap wi h p o-a ophic signalling. Myokine signalling ia ac i in ype II ecep o s (Ac RII) has been ecognized as a key pa hway by which muscle mass migh be p ese ed in many clinical con ex s42,43; ye , we saw no e idence o en ichmen o associa ions a ound genes in a cus om-defined pa hway o myos a in/ac i in signalling h ough Ac RII ( e . 42; Supplemen a y Table 6A and B; desc ibed in mo e de ail in he me hods sec ion). We also pe o med gene-based associa ion analyses using VEGAS44 o genes encoding ecep o s and ligands in he Ac RII signalling pa hway, as well as known a ophy e ec o s (Supplemen a y Table 7). Two genes (ACVR2B and FBXO32) showed a significan associa ion wi h g ip s eng h (Po0.0071, accoun ing o se en gene-based es s; Suppleme- n a y Table 7). ACVR2B, o which we ound he s onges e idence o gene-based associa ion (P¼0.0002), encodes he p incipal ansmemb ane ecep o o myos a in: he a ge o BYM338, a monoclonal an ibody-based inhibi o o Ac RIIB, which has shown ea ly p omise in e e sing muscle a ophy and p omo ing hype ophy in phase I ials45,46.FBXO32 encodes he E3 ubiqui in ligase A ogin-1/MAFbx, which is ecognized as undamen al e ec o o a ophy42. T ans o med ib oblas s Ce eb al co ex Ce ebellum Ce ebella hemisphe e Basal ganglia (NAcc) Basal ganglia (cauda e) Hypo halamus Hippocampus Basal ganglia (pu amen) Whole blood Tes is Tibial ne e Skele al muscle ASB8 RAET1G ARL17A LRRC37A LRRC37A2 WDR73 LRPPRC SLC35E2B KIF1B SPPL2C ARHGAP27 ACTG1 CHRDL2 PLEKHM1 H2AFJ ARHGDIB CRHR1 FMNL1 MAPT ERP27 GFAP MGP RP11−182J1.16 SLIT1 −7 −4.94 −1.96 0 1.96 4.94 7 Figu e 2 | Me aXcan-p edic ed associa ion o p edic ed gene ansc ip le els wi h g ip s eng h ac oss biologically ele an issues in GTEx. Da a a e shown o all genes a which al e ed ansc ip ion was significan ly associa ed wi h g ip s eng h in a leas one biologically ele an issue, a e accoun ing o mul iple es ing. Da a a e z-sco es o ansc ip le el associa ion wi h highe handg ip s eng h, clus e ed by issue. Di ec ion o z-sco e indica es whe he highe o lowe gene exp ession is associa ed wi h highe g ip s eng h. Absolu e z-sco e41.96 indica es nominal significance a P 0.05, and Z4.94 indica es significance a e adjus men o mul iple es ing (P 7.91 107). NAcc, nucleus accumbens. ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 4NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:16015 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions Implica ion o loci in eli e a hle ic pe o mance. Whils poo g ip s eng h is no mally conside ed a ma ke o ail y, we also in es iga ed he ole o g ip s eng h-associa ed SNVs in he opposi e ex eme o physiology: eli e a hle e s a us. We examined he associa ion o g ip s eng h-associa ed SNVs wi h odds o being an eli e sp in /powe a hle e in a me a-analysis o ou s udies o sp in and powe a hle es (N a hle es ¼616, N con ols ¼1,610; see Me hods and Supplemen a y No e o u he de ails o me hods and pa icipan s). Among he 14 a ailable SNVs, we saw no e idence o associa ion wi h eli e a hle e s a us (Supplemen a y Table 8). P e iously, a nonsense mu a ion (R577X) in ACTN3, which encodes he ac in-binding p o ein a-ac inin 3 in skele al muscle, has been associa ed wi h eli e a hle e s a us47. We ound a nominally significan associa ion o he s op-gain a ian (T allele) wi h lowe g ip s eng h (addi i e: b¼0.062 kg, P¼0.018) (Supplemen a y Table 9) al hough we ound no e idence o any depa u e om an addi i e gene ic model a his locus (P domde ¼0.72; Supplemen a y Fig. 5). Va ian associa ion wi h muscle his ology. We also examined whe he he lead SNVs a g ip s eng h-associa ed loci we e associa ed wi h in e se-no malized muscle fib e ype and capil- la y densi y in a small sample in which muscle fib e ype his- ology and genome-wide geno yping we e a ailable (13 o 16 SNVs we e a ailable; Supplemen a y Table 10). Allowing o 13 es s (Po3.8 103), he g ip s eng h- aising allele a TGFA was associa ed wi h a lowe p opo ion o ype I (slow- wi ch oxida i e) muscle fib es (b¼0.16, P¼3.3 103), and a endency owa ds highe p opo ion o ype IIB ( as - wi ch glycoly ic) muscle fib es (b¼0.16, P¼5.5 103) (Supplemen- a y Table 10). We acknowledge limi ed powe in his small sample o iden i y modes e ec sizes. Gi en a mino allele e- quency o 0.1 and a sample size o 656 indi iduals, we es ima ed 80% powe o de ec an e ec size o B0.35 SDs. MR o in e media e pheno ypes on muscle s eng h. Gi en he oles o sex- and g ow h ho mones and ela ed pheno ypes in muscle g ow h and de elopmen 48–50, we pe o med summa y s a is ic MR51,52 o es whe he gene ically-de e mined sex ho mone binding globulin (SHBG), dehyd oepiand os e one sulpha e (DHEA-S), insulin and insulin-like g ow h ac o -I (IGF-I) le els we e associa ed wi h g ip s eng h. Using genome- wide significan ly associa ed SNVs o SHBG ( e . 53), DHEA-S ( e . 54) and IGF-1 le els55, we saw no e idence o a causal associa ion wi h g ip s eng h (Supplemen a y Table 11). We saw some indica ion o causali y o insulin esis ance and as ing insulin le els in g ip s eng h (Supplemen a y Table 11) in in e se- a iance and median-weigh ed analyses, al hough he conside able he e ogenei y in in e se- a iance weigh ed esul s wa an s a cau ious in e p e a ion (Supplemen a y Table 11; Supplemen a y Fig. 6). Muscle s eng h as a possible causal exposu e. Using a MR app oach, we in es iga ed he po en ially causal ole o muscula s eng h in bo h mo ali y and disease ou comes, u ilizing he 16 eplica ed loci as an ins umen al a iable o model gene ically de e mined g ip s eng h as a p oxy o wide muscula s eng h. Mo ali y: We ound no e idence o a causal ela ionship be ween muscula s eng h and all-cause mo ali y in 21,043 pa icipan s (5,699 dea hs) d awn om he EPIC-No olk coho (haza d a io (HR) pe kg highe g ip s eng h (95% CI): 0.96 (0.91, 1.03), P¼0.265) (Fig. 3a). Howe e , gi en wide CIs we also sough o imp o e powe using a ecen ly published app oach le e aging da a on pa en al li espan56. Using his app oach in T ai T ai P- alue P- alue 0.953 0.086 0.229 0.265 0.96 (0.91, 1.03) 0.00 (–0.05, 0.05) 0.04 (–0.01, 0.09) 0.02 (–0.01, 0.05) 0.074 0.878 0.07 (–0.01, 0.15) 0.01 (–0.15, 0.18) –0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 Be a (kg·m–2) Odds a io 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 –0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 Be a (s anda d de ia ion) Haza d a io E ec (95% CI) E ec (95% CI) 1.01 (0.98, 1.04) 1.00 (0.96, 1.03) 1.00 (0.98, 1.03) 0.99 (0.94, 1.03) 0.631 0.433 0.020 0.98 (0.93, 1.03) 0.95 (0.90, 0.99) 0.504 0.859 0.739 Fo ea m BMD Lumba spine BMD Femo al neck BMD Mo ali y (EPIC-No olk) Pa e nal li espan (UKB) Pa en al li espan (UKB) Any ac u e Myoca dial in a c ion Co ona y hea disease Lean mass index Fa mass index 184,305 171.876 120,326 21,043 133,123 138,096Ma e nal li espan (UKB) n ba dc Figu e 3 | Mendelian andomiza ion es ima es o he associa ion o g ip s eng h wi h mo ali y and mo bidi y ou comes. (a) Mo ali y and pa en al li espan in UKB and EPIC-No olk; (b) o ea m bone mine al densi y (BMD), lumba spine BMD and emo al neck BMD in GEFOS; (c) co ona y hea disease and myoca dial in a c ion in CARDIoGRAMplusC4D, and ac u e isk in GEFOS þEPIC-No olk; (d) lean mass index and a mass index in he Fenland S udy þEPIC-No olk (n¼12,851). E o ba s eflec 95% CI. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:16015 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions 5 UKB (102,072 pa e nal dea hs, 83,315 ma e nal dea hs), we again ound no e idence o causali y, wi h g ea e p ecision (HR (95% CI): 1.00 (0.98, 1.03), P¼0.739) (Fig. 3a). Co ona y hea disease. We nex in es iga ed a causal ole o g ip s eng h in ca dio ascula disease using genome-wide associa ion esul s o co ona y hea disease (CHD; 60,801 cases, 123,504 con ols) and myoca dial in a c ion (MI; 43,677 cases, 128,199 con ols) om he CARDIoGRAMplusC4D Conso - ium57 (Fig. 3c). We ound no e idence o a causal ela ionship be ween g ip s eng h and CHD (odds a io (OR) pe gene ically p edic ed kg highe g ip s eng h (95% CI): 0.99 (0.94, 1.03), P¼0.631) o MI (OR (95% CI): 0.98 (0.93, –1.03), P¼0.433) (Supplemen a y Table 12). This esul was u he suppo ed by c oss- ai LD Sco e eg ession esul s showing no significan gene ic co ela ion be ween g ip s eng h and CHD ( g ¼0.045, P¼0.362; Supplemen a y Table 13). F ac u e isk and bone mine al densi y: We pe o med MR analyses o ac u e isk using a me a-analysis o 1) summa y s a is ic MR esul s o ac u e isk om he Gene ic Fac o s o Os eopo osis (GEFOS) conso ium (ncases ¼20,439; ncon ols ¼78,843) (Supplemen a y No e; Supplemen a y Table 12), and 2) logis ic eg ession esul s om associa ion o he weigh ed g ip s eng h gene ic sco e wi h ac u e isk in he EPIC-No olk s udy (1,002 cases, 20,042 con ols). Me a-analysis esul s sugges ed a po en ial causal associa ion o gene ically- p edic ed highe g ip s eng h wi h lowe isk o ac u e (OR pe gene ically p edic ed kg highe g ip s eng h (95% CI): 0.95 (0.90– 0.99), P¼0.02; Fig. 3b). Summa y s a is ic MR o gene ically de e mined g ip s eng h on publicly a ailable bone mine al densi y (BMD) GWAS esul s58 did no show significan associa ions be ween g ip s eng h and BMD (Fig. 3c; Supplemen a y Table 12). Howe e , we did find genome-wide gene ic co ela ions o bone mine al densi y wi h g ip s eng h ( emo al neck BMD: g ¼0.123, P¼9.5 103; lumba spine BMD: g ¼0.156, P¼6104) (Supplemen a y Table 13), suppo i e o a ole o gene ically p edic ed g ip s eng h in ac u e isk. Simila o he BMD esul s, MR analyses o gene ically- de e mined g ip s eng h on me a-analysed GWAS esul s comp ising 12,851 pa icipan s om he Fenland and EPIC- No olk coho s did no show significan associa ions be ween g ip s eng h and lean mass index (LMI) o a mass index (FMI) (LMI: b¼0.072 kg m2,P¼0.074; FMI: b¼0.013 kg m 2,P¼0.878) (Fig. 3d; Supplemen a y Table 12). A significan gene ic co ela ion was obse ed be ween g ip s eng h and LMI ( g ¼0.258, P¼2.8 105), bu no FMI (Supplemen a y Table 13). Discussion We ha e iden ified 16 loci associa ed wi h maximal hand g ip s eng h a genome-wide significance. A numbe o he lead a ian s we e loca ed wi hin o close o genes implica ed in s uc u e and unc ion o skele al muscle fib es, neu onal main enance and signal ansduc ion in he cen al and pe iphe al ne ous sys ems. Pa i ioned he i abili y analyses indica ed significan issue-specific en ichmen o skele al muscle, CNS, connec i e issue and bone in he genome-wide g ip s eng h esul s. We obse ed e idence o sha ed gene ic ae iology be ween lean mass and g ip s eng h, while pa hway analyses indica ed a ole o genes in ol ed in egula ion o p o ein ca abolism in he ae iology o g ip s eng h. Due o he well-es ablished obse a ional associa ions o g ip s eng h wi h mo ali y and inciden CHD i has been hypo hesized ha imp o emen o muscle s eng h migh inc ease longe i y and educe isk o ad e se ca dio ascula e en s7. Ou MR analyses do no find e idence suppo i e o a causal ole o muscula s eng h in mo ali y isk, no in isk o ca dio ascula e en s (CHD and MI), lea ing open he possibili y ha hese obse a ional associa ions may be a ibu able o con ounding and/o e e se causali y. Rega dless, his does no nega e he impo ance o main aining s eng h and muscle mass du ing ageing as a s a egy o main ain physical unc ion59, and we acknowledge he po en ial limi a ions o ou MR. Fo example, he limi ed a iance in in e media e ai s explained by gene ic a ian s lea es unce ain y o e he p esence o a small causal e ec . Thus, expanded gene ic disco e y e o s and g ea e a ailabili y o la ge-scale s udies o disease ou comes will imp o e he p ecision o MR analyses in u u e. We saw e idence o sha ed gene ic ae iology o bone mine al densi y and lean mass wi h g ip s eng h, and MR esul s sugges ed a causal ole o highe muscula s eng h in lowe isk o ac u e. Collec i ely, hese esul s sugges ha he de e minan s o muscula s eng h a e sha ed wi h he de e minan s o ac u e isk and a e consis en wi h findings om in e en ion s udies o inc ease muscle s eng h, which ha e been shown o imp o e unc ional capaci y and educe he a eo alls 59, as well as a enua ing he a e o unc ional decline and inc eased ail y which o en ollows majo ac u e among he elde ly60. Despi e he es ablished decline in g ip s eng h wi h inc easing age, we did no obse e he e ogenei y in he e ec o g ip s eng h-associa ed a ian s wi h g ip s eng h by age. Howe e , we did obse e ha he cumula i e e ec o he gene ic sco e was g ea e in men han women. We saw e idence o en ichmen o associa ions wi h g ip s eng h a ound genes implica ed in myopa hies. We also no ed h ee loci wi h genome-wide significan associa ions con aining genes (KANSL1, PEX14 and LRPPRC) implica ed in a e, se e e clinical synd omes cha ac e ized by pheno ypes o p og essi e psychomo o impai men , muscle hypo onia and neu opa- hy29,31. Wi hin he UKB disco e y coho , he associa ion o all h ee loci wi h g ip s eng h pe sis ed a genome-wide significance e en a e sensi i i y analyses es ic ed o pa icipan s wi hou any o m o sel - epo ed condi ion which migh a ec muscle mass o unc ion. Whils hese clinical condi ions ep esen he ex eme pheno ype o highly dele e ious a e mu a ions in hese genes, we demons a e ha p oximal common a ian s a e likely o unde pin mo e sub le popula ion- le el a ia ion in s eng h in heal hy popula ions. Finally, we ound ha common a ia ion a ACVR2B, he p incipal ecep o o myos a in and ac i in in skele al muscle, is associa ed wi h popula ion-le el a ia ion in g ip s eng h. Ongoing clinical ials and de elopmen o pha maceu ical agen s a ge ing his pa hway ha e demons a ed hei po en ial o e e se a ophy and imp o e physical unc ioning46, and ou findings p o ide some le el o gene ic suppo o a ole in muscula s eng h. In conclusion, we iden ified 16 loci obus ly implica ed in g ip s eng h and p o ide insigh in o he unde lying biology o his impo an , widely s udied, ye poo ly cha ac e ized ai . MR analyses sugges no causal ole o muscula s eng h in mo ali y, bu do p o ide e idence o a causal ole in ac u e isk, highligh ing he impo ance o in e en ions o imp o e muscle s eng h as a means o educe ac u e isk and esul an mo bidi ies. Fu he gene ic and unc ional wo k o cha ac e ize hese loci will elucida e new pa hways in ol ed in he egula ion o muscle s eng h and in o m he de elopmen o d ugs o ackle muscle was ing and weakness. Me hods S udy coho s.S age one (disco e y) analyses comp ised pa icipan s d awn om he UK Biobank (UKB) s udy17, a la ge popula ion-based coho o middle and olde -aged (40–69 yea s) B i ish esiden s ec ui ed om UK Na ional Heal h Se ice (NHS) p ima y ca e egis e s be ween 2006 and 2010. In o al, 503,325 pa icipan s we e en olled, and a ended an ini ial assessmen isi a one o 22 s udy cen es loca ed h oughou England, Sco land and Wales, du ing which a comp ehensi e ca alogue o an h opome ic, li es yle and beha iou al exposu es ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 6NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:16015 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions we e assessed, and biological samples we e a ained. All pa icipan s p o ided in o med consen . UKB gained e hical app o al om he Na ional Resea ch E hics Commi ee (No h Wes ) and was conduc ed in ull compliance wi h p inciples o he Wo ld Medical Associa ion Decla a ion o Helsinki. Independen lead a ian s om s age one we e ollowed-up (s age wo analyses) in an independen sample o up o 53,145 whi e Eu opean indi iduals d awn om he Coho s o Hea and Aging Resea ch in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) conso ium16 and an addi ional se en collabo a ing s udies, which had assessed maximal isome ic hand g ip s eng h by dynamome y. De ails o all s age wo coho s (including he cons i uen coho s o CHARGE) a e p o ided in he Supplemen a y No e. Fu he desc ip i e de ails o he se en addi ional coho s a e p o ided in Supplemen a y Table 1. Desc ip i e de ails o CHARGE Coho s ha e been published in de ail elsewhe e16. Assessmen o g ip s eng h and co a ia es.Hand g ip s eng h a baseline in UKB was measu ed isome ically using a calib a ed Jama J00105 hyd aulic hand dynamome e (La aye e Ins umen Company, IN, USA) adjus ed o he indi idual’s hand size. Wi h he pa icipan sea ed, one measu emen was aken pe hand, and maximal g ip s eng h aken as he highe o he wo eadings. Body mass was assessed using a BC418MA Body Composi ion Analyse (Tani a Eu ope BV, Ams e dam, The Ne he lands), wi h he pa icipan d essed in ligh clo hing. S anding heigh was measu ed on a igid s adiome e (Seca, Bi mingham, UK). Pheno yping de ails o each o he s age wo coho s a e de ailed in Supplemen a y Table 1. Geno yping and impu a ion.Ou s age one analyses use da a om UKB’s impu ed in e im geno yping elease (May 2015), es ic ed o biallelic SNVs wi h MAF Z0.1%. Geno yping and impu a ion we e conduc ed by UKB using a cen alized pipeline, o which de ailed p o ocols a e a ailable (see URLs). B iefly, UKB ex ac ed DNA om EDTA bu y coa , be o e shipping o A yme ix (San a Cla a, CA, USA) o cen alized geno yping. Samples we e geno yped a 4800,000 loci on wo cus om-designed a ays wi h 95% common con en , designed o op imize quali y and quan i y o genome-wide impu a ion: he UK Biobank Axiom a ay, and he UK BiLEVE Axiom A ay. A e es ic ion o biallelic SNVs wi h MAFZ1% and addi ional sample geno yping QC, a subse o 641,081 au osomal SNVs om 152,256 samples we e a ailable o impu a ion. SNVs we e p e-phased using SHAPEIT3 so wa e and impu ed (using a modified e sion o IMPUTE2 so wa e) o a me ged e e ence panel con aining haplo ypes om he UK10K Conso ium combined wi h he 1000 Genomes P ojec e e ence (see URLs). This app oach has p e iously been shown o p o ide a high-quali y impu a ion e e ence in popula ions o mixed ances y61. Geno yping and impu a ion de ails o s age wo coho s a e de ailed in Supplemen a y Table 1. 17q21.31 Haplo ype impu a ion and analyses.Nine s uc u al haplo ypes p e iously epo ed a 17q21.31 we e impu ed acco ding o p e ious wo k33–35. Impu a ion was based on a haplo ype e e ence panel34, which uniquely coded each s uc u al haplo ype using a combina ion o wel e su oga e, i ual bina y ma ke s. In addi ion, he file con ained 6,302 flanking a ian haplo ypes. IMPUTE 2.3.2 was used o impu e he geno ypes o he su oga e ma ke s agains he e e ence panel. The panel con ained 284 geno yped a ian s wi hin he e e ence egion, p e-phased wi h SHAPEIT 2.837. Va ian s wi hin he copy-numbe a iable egion, o wi h MAFo0.01/Ha dy-Weinbe g Equilib ium Po110 6 we e excluded. Su oga e ma ke s we e subsequen ly decoded in o he co esponding nine s uc u al haplo ypes o analysis. Associa ion o haplo ypes (in e ed e sus non-in e ed, con inuous s uc u al a ian [a/b/g] copy numbe , and 9 common haplo ypes as a ca ego ical exposu e) wi h g ip s eng h was modelled using linea eg ession adjus ed o age, sex, heigh (m), BMI (kg m 2) and UKB geno ype chip in up o 111,860 un ela ed gene ic whi e Eu opeans defined cen ally by UKB (see URLs). He i abili y es ima ion.In UKB, a iance componen analyses we e pe o med in he subse o indi iduals o ‘whi e B i ish’ gene ic ances y using Res ic ed Es i- ma e Maximum Likelihood (REML) models in BOLT-LMM so wa e ( 2.2)62. Gene ic a iance was calcula ed on all quali y con olled geno yped au osomal SNVs, adjus ing o geno yping a ay and he op fi e gene ically-de e mined p incipal componen s. Genome-wide associa ion analyses o g ip s eng h.142,035 UKB pa icipan s had impu ed gene ic da a, g ip s eng h and ull co a ia e a ailabili y o genome-wide associa ion analyses; all we e o sel -iden ified whi e ances y, wi h he majo i y (94.6%) epo ing as whi e B i ish. Disco e y analyses o maximal g ip s eng h (n¼142,035) we e un using a Bayesian linea mixed model (LMM) adjus ed o age (yea s), sex, heigh (m) and BMI (kg m2), implemen ed in BOLT-LMM so wa e ( 2.2)62. P ima y analyses assumed addi i e (pe -allele) e ec . Analyses we e es ic ed o biallelic a ian s wi h MAFZ0.1% which had been di ec ly yped, o impu ed wi h impu a ion quali y (IMPUTE2 in o)Z0.4. LMMs o e a obus solu ion o handle unknown con ounding (pa icula ly ha a ising om sub-e hnic popula ion s a ifica ion and c yp ic ela edness) in genome-wide associa ion s udies, and con e inc eased powe in la ge popula ion-based coho s62. Independen loci om genome-wide disco e y we e defined as he 500 kb egion flanking each lead a ian eaching genome wide significance (P 5108). Independen lead a ian s (n¼21) we e ollowed-up in up o 53,145 indi iduals. In cases whe e an index a ian was no yped o impu ed a su ficien quali y, app op ia e p oxies we e defined as he a ian wi h he nex -lowes P- alue wi hin 500 kb o he index (Supplemen a y Table 15). Each s age wo coho accoun ed o popula ion s uc u e acco ding o i s usual p ac ice. Full de ails o he analy ical app oach and model specifica ion o each eplica ion coho a e summa ized in Supplemen a y Table 1. S age one and s age wo esul s o each o he 21 a ian s we e combined by in e se a iance-weigh ed fixed-e ec me a-analysis using METAL. Six een loci eached P 5108in combined me a-analysis and we e conside ed o be associa ed wi h g ip s eng h. To examine local linkage disequilib ium s uc u e o eplica ed loci, egional plo s o each o he 16 eplica ed loci we e gene a ed in LocusZoom using LD e e ence alues om he CEU panel o 1000G Phase I. To in es iga e possible independen signals a each o he 16 eplica ed loci, app oxima e condi ional analyses we e unde aken using Genome-Wide Complex T ai Analysis so wa e (GCTA, Ve sion 1.25.2). LD sco e eg ession.Using genome-wide summa y s a is ics om ou UKB phase one analyses, he ecen ly-desc ibed LD Sco e Reg ession me hod desc ibed by Bulik-Sulli an and colleagues63 (implemen ed in LDSC so wa e, 1.0.0) was used o (i) es ima e gene ic co ela ion be ween g ip s eng h and o he pheno ypes, and (ii) de i e issue-specific pa i ioned he i abili y o g ip s eng h, based on p e-calcula ed Eu opean LD Sco es. To a oid con ounding by impu a ion quali y, all analyses we e es ic ed o a ian s a ailable in HapMap Phase III. Gene ic co ela ions. Using c oss- ai LD Sco e eg ession, genome-wide gene ic co ela ions o g ip s eng h we e calcula ed wi h CHD isk, lean mass index (LMI), a mass index (FMI) and bone mine al densi y (BMD) measu ed a he o ea m, emo al neck o lumba spine. Fo CHD and BMD we used publicly a ailable GWAS summa y s a is ics o m he CARDIoGRAMplusC4D57 and GEFOS58 conso ia, espec i ely. To ob ain genome-wide summa y s a is ics o LMI and FMI, we conduc ed GWAS in up o 12851 indi iduals d awn om he Fenland S udy and EPIC-No olk. De ails o hese coho s a e p o ided in he Supplemen a y No e, and Supplemen a y Table 14. LMI and FMI (kg m2)we edefinedasdualx- ay abso p iome y (DXA)-de i ed lean mass o a mass, espec i ely, di ided by he squa e o DXA-de i ed heigh (GE Luna P odigy p ocessed using Luna EnCORE 14.1, GE Heal hca e). GWAS we e conduc ed sepa a ely in each coho unning a linea mixed model using BOLT-LMM62. FMI analyses we e adjus ed o age and sex. Because o he sex specific dis ibu ion o he pheno ype, LMI analyses we e un sex s a ified and adjus ed o age. Resul s om bo h coho s we e combined by fixed- e ec in e se a iance-weigh ed me a-analysis using METAL. Tissue-specific pa i ioned he i abili y: Pa i ioned he i abili y by LD Sco e Reg ession can iden i y whe he ce ain cell ypes a e en iched o unc ional gene ca ego ies which disp opo iona ely con ibu e o he he i abili y o a pheno ype36. In his way, o e - ep esen ed e ec o issues impo an in he ae iology o he pheno ype can be iden ified. Pa i ioned he i abili y was un indi idually o each o he eigh cu a ed issue classes dis ibu ed wi h LDSC, adjus ing in each case o he i abili y explained by each unc ional ca ego y o a ian s ac oss he genome ( ha is, in a non- issue-specific manne ). A Bon e oni-co ec ed log 10 P- alue accoun ing o eigh es s was aken as indica i e o s a is ical significance. Exp ession analyses.To explo e he po en ial unc ional significance o g ip s eng h a ian s in gene exp ession, and o p io i ize unc ional genes alling wi hin iden ified loci, we unde ook a numbe o exp ession-based analyses. Ini ially, a look-up o all 16 eplica ed g ip s eng h a ian s o hei bes p oxy ( 240.8) was conduc ed in skele al muscle, ans o med fib oblas s, ne ous sys em and b ain egions in he GTEx esou ce o iden i y eQTL associa ions (see URLs). Va ian s passing GTEx c i e ia o issue-specific eQTL associa ion, and in high LD ( 2Z0.8) wi h he bes eQTL o he ansc ip in ques ion in he issue o in e es we e conside ed significan eQTLs. To supplemen his a ian -cen ic app oach, we addi ionally ook ad an age o wo new me hods o in eg a ing genome wide GWAS summa y s a is ics wi h exp ession associa ions om independen s udies: SMR40 and Me aXcan39.By u ilizing es ablished eQTL da a se s as e e ence, hese app oaches a e able o e ec i ely model expec ed a ia ion in he ansc ip ome o he GWAS sample based on a ia ion in au osomal SNVs ac oss he genome, and hen es o independen associa ions be ween impu ed ansc ip le els and he pheno ype o in e es . To es o associa ions o ansc ip abundance wi h g ip s eng h in whole blood, we implemen ed SMR so wa e using published whole blood eQTL da a om Wes a and colleagues41 as he e e ence panel. Me aXcan—an ex ension o he P ediXcan app oach modified o use summa y-le el associa ion s a is ics as inpu —analyses we e used o explo e u he issue-specific associa ions be ween modelled gene exp ession and g ip s eng h. Tissue-specific exp ession p edic ion models gene a ed om GTEx we e downloaded om he P edic DB esou ce (see URLs) as ansc ip ome e e ence. We conse a i ely conside ed p edic ed exp ession o a gene o be associa ed wi h g ip s eng h a a Me aXcan P- alue 2.52 107, aking each gene associa ion in each issue as an independen es o he pu poses o Bon e oni co ec ion. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:16015 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions 7 Gene se en ichmen analyses.Genome-wide disco e y esul s om he UKB coho we e es ed o en ichmen o p e-specified gene se s based on common unc ional anno a ion o known biological pa hways in MAGENTA ( 2.4)64. En ichmen was assessed in a hypo hesis- ee manne ac oss gene se s d awn om six public da abases o gene on ology, unc ional anno a ion and canonical/cu a ed pa hways: GO Te ms, he P o ein Analysis h ough E olu iona y Rela ionships (PANTHER) da abase, Ingenui y, he Kyo o Encyclopaedia o Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Bioca a and Reac ome pa hways (downloaded ia he Molecula Signa u es Da abase, MSigDB [see URLs], July 2011). Analyses we e es ic ed o 3,216 gene se s wi h an e ec i e size o Z10 genes a e fil e ing o p oximal genes and genes no con aining a ian s o analysis. Cus om se s we e also defined om li e a u e e iew, inco po a ing genes wi h known unc ion in pa hways o p ocesses ele an o muscle de elopmen and main enance. Genes in ol ed in signal ansduc ion o myos a in/ac i in signalling ia Ac i in A ype II ecep o s (ACVR2A and ACVR2B) we e defined om Han e al.42. Monogenic genes implica ed in muscula dys ophies and myopa hies we e based on Kaplan & Ham oun (2014)65 wi h addi ional manual cu a ion o include collagen IV-opa hies, congeni al myopa hies and glycogen s o age diseases which may p esen wi h a simila pa e n o limb-gi dle muscle weakness. Gene-based associa ion es s.Genes in ol ed in myos a in/ac i in signalling ia ac i in ype II ecep o s (FST, MSTN, ACVR2A, ACVR2B) and known a ophy e ec o s TRIM63 and FBXO32 we e iden ified om li e a u e42,43 and defined as candida e genes o g ip s eng h based on hei biological p io o an in ol emen in skele al muscle ophism. Gene-based associa ion es s we e pe o med o each candida e using he Ve sa ile Gene-based Associa ion S udy (VEGAS) algo i hm44, calcula ing LD om HapMap Eu opeans. VEGAS was applied o he g ip s eng h disco e y-phase associa ion esul s ac oss he whole genome, es ic ing o di ec ly yped and well-impu ed a ian s (IMPUTE in o40.8). Muscle his ology lookup.To iden i y whe he g ip s eng h a ian s we e associa ed wi h elemen s o muscle his ology, we looked-up each o he 16 eplica ed loci om combined analyses in a p e-exis ing GWAS o muscle his ology pa ame e s in a sample o 656 men om h ee independen coho s o Swedish ances y (see Supplemen a y No e o coho de ails). Specifically, we in es iga ed he linea (addi i e) associa ion o each o he 16 lead SNVs wi h pe cen age o (i) ype I fib es, (ii) ype IIA fib es and (iii) ype IIB fib es om muscle biopsy, as well as capilla y densi y (calcula ed as he numbe o capilla ies di ided by he o al numbe o fib es). Pheno ypes we e in e se-no malized p io o analysis. To be e quan i y powe in his sample, o mal powe calcula ions we e pe o med using Quan o (see URLs). Mendelian andomiza ion analyses.We pe o med summa y s a is ic Mendelian andomiza ion (MR)51,52 o es whe he gene ically de e mined sex and g ow h ho mone- ela ed pheno ypes we e causally associa ed wi h g ip s eng h. As p ima y analyses we pe o med in e se a iance weigh ed summa y s a is ics MR52. In addi ion, as sensi i i y analyses o obus causal in e ence we es ed o he e ogenei y using Coch an’s Q es , an MR-Egge 66 o assess o pleio opic e ec , and addi ionally used a weigh ed median es ima o and penalized weigh ed median es ima o 67. We used publicly a ailable genome-wide associa ion esul s o sex ho mone binding globulin (SHBG)53, dehyd oepiand os e one sulpha e (DHEA-S)54, as ing insulin68, insulin sec e ion69 and insulin-like g ow h ac o -I (IGF-I)55. The a ian s included in he MRs a e lis ed in Supplemen a y Table 16. G ip s eng h summa y s a is ics we e ob ained om ou s age one GWAS in UKB. To in e causali y in he associa ion o g ip s eng h wi h CHD, myoca dial in a c ion (MI), ac u e isk, BMD ( o ea m, lumba spine, emo al neck), LMI and FMI, we an summa y s a is ic MR as desc ibed abo e using he 16 iden ified loci as ins umen al a iable o gene ically-de e mined g ip s eng h. Fo CHD, BMD, LMI and FMI we used he same GWAS summa y s a is ics as we used o es gene ic co ela ions (see abo e). In addi ion, we used publicly a ailable MI summa y s a is ics om he CARDIoGRAMplusC4D conso ium57, ac u e isk summa y s a is ics om an ongoing analysis by he GEFOS conso ium (Supplemen a y No e), and indi idual ac u e isk da a in EPIC-No olk. Whe e g ip s eng h lead SNVs we e no a ailable in he ou come pheno ype summa y s a is ics, p oxies we e defined as he a ian wi h he nex -lowes P- alue o associa ion wi h g ip s eng h wi hin 500 kb o he index in s age one (UKB). All a ian s included in he analyses a e de ailed in Supplemen a y Table 18. Because EPIC-No olk was included in he LMI and FMI GWAS me a-analyses, and in he indi idual le el da a ac u e isk analyses, we used he g ip s eng h e ec sizes ob ained a e exclusion o he EPIC-No olk s udy in he g ip s eng h-LMI, g ip s eng h-FMI and indi idual le el g ip s eng h- ac u e isk MR analyses (Supplemen a y Table 17). On he indi idual le el ac u e isk da a we an a logis ic eg ession model adjus ed o age and sex. Summa y s a is ics and indi idual le el ac u e isk MR esul s om GEFOS and EPIC-No olk we e me a-analysed using fixed e ec s me a-analysis. To es he causal ela ionship wi h all-cause mo ali y, we calcula ed a gene ic g ip s eng h isk sco e pe indi idual in he EPIC-No olk s udy (n o al ¼21,043, ncases ¼5,699 cases) based on he numbe o g ip s eng h-inc easing alleles weigh ed by he e ec size om he combined phase one and ollow-up analyses. We used e ec sizes ob ained by fixed-e ec in e se a iance-weigh ed me a-analysis o he phase one and wo esul s, excluding EPIC-No olk, o gene a e weigh s ha we e independen o EPIC-No olk (Supplemen a y Table 17). The gene ic isk sco e o mo ali y associa ion was es ed unde a Cox p opo ional haza ds model adjus ed o age and sex. P opo ional haza ds we e confi med using s anda d echnique. We also sough o imp o e powe by using pa en al li espans in UKB (pa e nal: n TOTAL ¼133,123, n DEATHS ¼102,072; ma e nal: n TOTAL ¼138,096, n DEATHS ¼83,315), in line wi h p e ious wo k56. Pa en al li espans and ali e/dead s a us we e eg essed using Cox models on o sp ing geno ype, in e ec impu ing pa en geno ype om o sp ing. The e ec s obse ed hus eflec he e ec o o sp ing geno ype on pa en al pheno ype, and he expec ed allelic dosages in he pa en al gene a ion a e hal he measu ed dosages in o sp ing. E ec es ima es pe pa en al allele a e co espondingly wice ha obse ed pe o sp ing allele: esul s shown a e he e ec o one allele in pa en s on pa en s’ li espan. Associa ion o eplica ed loci wi h eli e a hle ic s a us.Using da a om ou mul i-e hnic coho s o eli e a hle es, including eli e Japanese a hle es and con ols (N a hle es ¼54, N con ols ¼406); eli e A ican-Ame ican ((N a hle es ¼79, N con ols ¼391) and Jamaican sp in /powe a hle es (N a hle es ¼88, N con ols ¼87), and Eu opean a hle es (N a hle es ¼395, N con ols ¼726) (Supplemen a y No e), we assessed he associa ion o he 16 eplica ed g ip s eng h index a ian s wi h odds o a aining eli e a hle e s a us, ela i e o age, sex and e hnically-ma ched con ols, using condi ional logis ic eg ession (addi i e model). Analyses we e pe o med sepa a ely in each coho , and me a-analysed using METAL. Tes s o model fi .To es o depa u e om addi i i y, we used a es o dominance de ia ion, including wo e ms o bes guess geno ypes: a e m encoding he majo homozygo es, he e ozygo es and mino allele homozygo es as 0,1,2 and ano he coding hem as 0,1,0, which es s whe he he he e ozygo es ha e mean ai alues hal way be ween he homozygo e g oups and can de ec a depa u e om addi i i y. Checks o allele selec ion by age.Gi en ha obse a ional g ip s eng h is s ongly p edic i e o mo ali y8, we an wo complemen a y analyses in UKB o ensu e ha s eng h-inc easing alleles om combined s age one þ wo analyses we e no unde selec ion by age. Modelling each SNV as s eng h-inc easing allele dosage, linea eg ession was used o assess he associa ion o age wi h allele dosage (age as dependen a iable). We hen pe o med he in e se o his eg ession o gauge whe he allele dosage was p edic ed by age (age as he independen a iable). This app oach has ecen ly been applied o es o selec ion o a ian s by age in he Gene ic Epidemiology Resea ch on Aging (GERA) coho 18. Analyses we e es ic ed o 112,337 un ela ed whi e Eu opeans defined cen ally by UKB, and adjus ed o sex and geno yping chip. URLs.UK Biobank Geno yping and QC Documen a ion h p://biobank.c su.ox.- ac.uk/c ys al/docs/geno yping_qc.pd ; UK Biobank Phasing and Impu a ion P o- ocol; h p://biobank.c su.ox.ac.uk/c ys al/docs/impu e_ukb_ 1.pd ; MSigDB; h p://so wa e.b oadins i u e.o g/gsea/msigdb; SMR; h p://cnsgenomics.com/ so wa e/sm ; P edic DB Da abase; h p://p edic db.hakyimlab.o g; Quan o; h p:// bios a s.usc.edu/Quan o.h ml Da a a ailabili y.S age one da a a e om UK Biobank, and can be ob ained upon applica ion (ukbiobank.ac.uk). Access o unde lying eplica ion and ollow-up da a including his ology and eli e a hle ic pe o mance coho s may be limi ed by pa icipan consen and da a sha ing ag eemen s; eques s should be di ec ed in he fi s ins ance ia he co esponding au ho s. P e-defined gene se s (MSigDB), exp ession da a (GTEx) and ansc ip ome models used by Me aXcan (P edic DB) and SMR me hods a e a ailable om he lis ed URLs. Re e ences 1. Bohannon, R. W. Hand-g ip dynamome y p edic s u u e ou comes in aging adul s. J. Ge ia . Phys. The . 31, 3–10 (2008). 2. Taekema, D. G., Gussekloo, J., Maie , A. B., Wes endo p, R. G. J. & de C aen, A. J. M. Handg ip s eng h as a p edic o o unc ional, psychological and social heal h. A p ospec i e popula ion-based s udy among he oldes old. Age Ageing 39, 331–337 (2010). 3. Ran anen, T. e al. Muscle s eng h as a p edic o o onse o ADL dependence in people aged 75 yea s. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 14, 10–15 (2002). 4. Cheung, C.-L. e al. Low handg ip s eng h is a p edic o o os eopo o ic ac u es: c oss-sec ional and p ospec i e e idence om he Hong Kong Os eopo osis S udy. Age 34, 1239–1248 (2012). 5. Ka ¨ kka ¨inen, M. e al. Associa ion be ween unc ional capaci y es s and ac u es: an eigh -yea p ospec i e popula ion-based coho s udy. Os eopo os. In . 19, 1203–1210 (2008). 6. Sa ino, E. e al. Handg ip s eng h p edic s pe sis en walking eco e y a e hip ac u e su ge y. Am. J. Med. 126, 1068–75.e1 (2013). 7. Leong, D. P. e al. P ognos ic alue o g ip s eng h: findings om he P ospec i e U ban Ru al Epidemiology (PURE) s udy. Lance 386, 266–273 (2015). ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 8NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:16015 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions 8. Coope , R., Kuh, D. & Ha dy, R.Mo ali y Re iew G oup & FALCon and HALCyon S udy Teams. Objec i ely measu ed physical capabili y le els and mo ali y: sys ema ic e iew and me a-analysis. BMJ 341, c4467 (2010). 9. O ega, F. B., Sil en oinen, K., Tynelius, P. & Rasmussen, F. Muscula s eng h in male adolescen s and p ema u e dea h: coho s udy o one million pa icipan s. BMJ 345, e7279 (2012). 10. Reed, T., Fabsi z, R. R. R., Selby, J. V. V. & Ca melli, D. Gene ic influences and g ip s eng h no ms in he NHLBI win s udy males aged 59-69. Ann. Hum. Biol. 18, 425–432 (1991). 11. A den, N. K. & Spec o , T. D. Gene ic influences on muscle s eng h, lean body mass, and bone mine al densi y: a win s udy. J. Bone Mine . Res. 12, 2076–2081 (1997). 12. Ma eini, A. M. e al. He i abili y es ima es o endopheno ypes o long and heal h li e: he Long Li e Family S udy. J. Ge on ol. A. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 65, 1375–1379 (2010). 13. Saye , A. A. e al. Polymo phism o he IGF2 gene, bi h weigh and g ip s eng h in adul men. Age Ageing 31, 468–470 (2002). 14. Da o, S. e al. UCP3 polymo phisms, hand g ip pe o mance and su i al a old age: associa ion analysis in wo Danish middle aged and elde ly coho s. Mech. Ageing De . 133, 530–537 (2012). 15. Chan, J. P. L. e al. Gene ics o hand g ip s eng h in mid o la e li e. Age 37, 9745 (2015). 16. Ma eini, A. M. e al. GWAS analysis o handg ip and lowe body s eng h in olde adul s in he CHARGE conso ium. Aging Cell 15, 792–800 ð2016Þ: 17. Sudlow, C. e al. UK Biobank: an open access esou ce o iden i ying he causes o a wide ange o complex diseases o middle and old age. PLoS Med. 12, e1001779 (2015). 18. Mos a a i, H., Be isa, T., P zewo ski, M. & Pick ell, J. K. Iden i ying gene ic a ian s ha a ec iabili y in la ge coho s. P ep in a bioRxi h ps://doi.o g/ 10.1101/085969 (2016). 19. E as i, J. M. Cos ame es: he Achilles’ heel o He culean muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 13591–13594 (2003). 20. Rybako a, I. N., Pa el, J. R. & E as i, J. M. The dys ophin complex o ms a mechanically s ong link be ween he sa colemma and cos ame ic ac in. J. Cell Biol. 150, 1209–1214 (2000). 21. Dalkilic, I. & Kunkel, L. M. Muscula dys ophies: genes o pa hogenesis. Cu . Opin. Gene . De . 13, 231–238 (2003). 22. Sonnemann, K. J. e al. Cy oplasmic gamma-ac in is no equi ed o skele al muscle de elopmen bu i s absence leads o a p og essi e myopa hy. De . Cell 11, 387–397 (2006). 23. Bu , A. R. e al. Na þdys egula ion coupled wi h Ca2 þen y h ough NCX1 p omo es muscula dys ophy in mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 34, 1991–2002 (2014). 24. Mackle , J. M., D ummond, J. A., Loewen, C. A., Robinson, I. M. & Reis , N. E. The C(2)B Ca(2 þ)-binding mo i o synap o agmin is equi ed o synap ic ansmission in i o.Na u e 418, 340–344 (2002). 25. Dale, J. M. e al. The spinal muscula a ophy mouse model, SMAD7, displays al e ed axonal anspo wi hou global neu ofilamen al e a ions. Ac a Neu opa hol. 122, 331–341 (2011). 26. Junie , M.-P. Wha ole(s) o TGFain he cen al ne ous sys em? P og. Neu obiol. 62, 443–473 (2000). 27. Liso oski, F. e al. T ans o ming g ow h ac o alpha exp ession as a esponse o mu ine mo o neu ons o axonal inju y and mu a ion-induced degene a ion. J. Neu opa hol. Exp. Neu ol. 56, 459–471 (1997). 28. Boille ´e, S., Cadusseau, J., Coulpie , M., G annec, G. & Junie , M. P. T ans o ming g ow h ac o alpha: a p omo e o mo oneu on su i al o po en ial biological ele ance. J. Neu osci. 21, 7079–7088 (2001). 29. Deb ay, F.-G. e al. LRPPRC mu a ions cause a pheno ypically dis inc o m o Leigh synd ome wi h cy och ome c oxidase deficiency. J. Med. Gene . 48, 183–189 (2011). 30. S einbe g, S. J. e al. Pe oxisome biogenesis diso de s. Biochim. Biophys. Ac a 1763, 1733–1748 2006. 31. Koolen, D. A. e al. Mu a ions in he ch oma in modifie gene KANSL1 cause he 17q21.31 mic odele ion synd ome. Na . Gene . 44, 639–641 ð2012Þ: 32. Nalls, M. A. e al. La ge-scale me a-analysis o genome-wide associa ion da a iden ifies six new isk loci o Pa kinson’s disease. Na . Gene . 46, 989–993 (2014). 33. Wain, L. V. e al. No el insigh s in o he gene ics o smoking beha iou , lung unc ion, and ch onic obs uc i e pulmona y disease (UK BiLEVE): a gene ic associa ion s udy in UK Biobank. Lance . Respi . Med. 3, 769–781 (2015). 34. Boe ge , L. M., Handsake , R. E., Zody, M. C. & McCa oll, S. A. S uc u al haplo ypes and ecen e olu ion o he human 17q21.31 egion. Na . Gene . 44, 881–885 (2012). 35. S einbe g, K. M. e al. S uc u al di e si y and A ican o igin o he 17q21.31 in e sion polymo phism. Na . Gene . 44, 872–880 (2012). 36. Finucane, H. K. e al. Pa i ioning he i abili y by unc ional anno a ion using genome-wide associa ion summa y s a is ics. Na . Gene . 47, 1228–1235 (2015). 37. Moo ha, V. K. e al. Iden ifica ion o a gene causing human cy och ome c oxidase deficiency by in eg a i e genomics. P oc. Na l Acad. Sci. USA 100, 605–610 (2003). 38. Julien, M. e al. Phospha e-dependen egula ion o MGP in os eoblas s: ole o ERK1/2 and F a-1. J. Bone Mine . Res. 24, 1856–1868 (2009). 39. Ba bei a, A. e al. In eg a ing issue specific mechanisms in o GWAS summa y esul s. P ep in a bioRxi h ps://doi.o g/10.1101/045260 (2016). 40. Zhu, Z. e al. In eg a ion o summa y da a om GWAS and eQTL s udies p edic s complex ai gene a ge s. Na . Gene . 48, 481–487 ð2016Þ: 41. Wes a, H.-J. e al. Sys ema ic iden ifica ion o ans eQTLs as pu a i e d i e s o known disease associa ions. Na . Gene . 45, 1238–1243 (2013). 42. Han, H. Q., Zhou, X., Mi ch, W. E. & Goldbe g, A. L. Myos a in/ac i in pa hway an agonism: molecula basis and he apeu ic po en ial. In . J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 45, 2333–2347 (2013). 43. Cohen, S., Na han, J. A. & Goldbe g, A. L. Muscle was ing in disease: molecula mechanisms and p omising he apies. Na . Re . D ug Disco . 14, 58–74 (2015). 44. Liu, J. Z. e al. A e sa ile gene-based es o genome-wide associa ion s udies. Am. J. Hum. Gene . 87, 139–145 (2010). 45. Lach-T ifilie , E. e al. An an ibody blocking ac i in ype II ecep o s induces s ong skele al muscle hype ophy and p o ec s om a ophy. Mol. Cell. Biol. 34, 606–618 (2014). 46. Ama o, A. A. e al. T ea men o spo adic inclusion body myosi is wi h bimag umab. Neu ology 83, 2239–2246 (2014). 47. Yang, N. e al. ACTN3 geno ype is associa ed wi h human eli e a hle ic pe o mance. Am. J. Hum. Gene . 73, 627–631 (2003). 48. She field-Moo e, M. & U ban, R. J. An o e iew o he endoc inology o skele al muscle. T ends Endoc inol. Me ab. 15, 110–115 (2004). 49. Ho s man, A. M., Dillon, E. L., U ban, R. J. & She field-Moo e, M. The ole o and ogens and es ogens on heal hy aging and longe i y. J. Ge on ol. 67, 1140–1152 (2012). 50. Gulle , N. P., Hebba , G. & Ziegle , T. R. Upda e on clinical ials o g ow h ac o s and anabolic s e oids in cachexia and was ing 1–4. Cu . Opin. Clin. Nu . Me ab. Ca e 91, 1143–1147 (2010). 51. Lawlo , D. A., Ha bo d, R. M., S e ne, J. A. C., Timpson, N. & Da ey Smi h, G. Mendelian andomiza ion: using genes as ins umen s o making causal in e ences in epidemiology. S a . Med. 27, 1133–1163 (2008). 52. Bu gess, S., Bu e wo h, A. & Thompson, S. G. Mendelian andomiza ion analysis wi h mul iple gene ic a ian s using summa ized da a. Gene . Epidemiol. 37, 658–665 (2013). 53. Co iello, A. D. e al. A genome-wide associa ion me a-analysis o ci cula ing sex ho mone-binding globulin e eals mul iple Loci implica ed in sex s e oid ho mone egula ion. PLoS Gene . 8, e1002805 (2012). 54. Zhai, G. e al. Eigh common gene ic a ian s associa ed wi h se um DHEAS le els sugges a key ole in ageing mechanisms. PLoS Gene . 7, e1002025 (2011). 55. Teume , A. e al. Genomewide me a-analysis iden ifies loci associa ed wi h IGF-I and IGFBP-3 le els wi h impac on age- ela ed ai s. Aging Cell 15, 811–824 (2016). 56. Joshi, P. K. e al. Va ian s nea CHRNA3/5 and APOE ha e age- and sex- ela ed e ec s on human li espan. Na . Commun. 7, 11174 (2016). 57. Nikpay, M. e al. A comp ehensi e 1,000 Genomes-based genome-wide associa ion me a-analysis o co ona y a e y disease. Na . Gene . 47, 1121–1130 (2015). 58. Zheng, H. e al. Whole-genome sequencing iden ifies EN1 as a de e minan o bone densi y and ac u e. Na u e 526, 112–117 (2015). 59. Clemson, L. e al. In eg a ion o balance and s eng h aining in o daily li e ac i i y o educe a e o alls in olde people ( he LiFE s udy): andomised pa allel ial. BMJ 345, e4547 (2012). 60. Edwa ds, B. J., Song, J., Dunlop, D. D., Fink, H. A. & Cauley, J. A. Func ional decline a e inciden w is ac u es--S udy o Os eopo o ic F ac u es: p ospec i e coho s udy. BMJ 341, c3324–c3324 (2010). 61. Huang, J. e al. Imp o ed impu a ion o low- equency and a e a ian s using he UK10K haplo ype e e ence panel. Na . Commun. 6, 8111 (2015). 62. Loh, P.-R. e al. E ficien Bayesian mixed-model analysis inc eases associa ion powe in la ge coho s. Na . Gene . 47, 284–290 (2015). 63. Bulik-Sulli an, B. K. e al. LD Sco e eg ession dis inguishes con ounding om polygenici y in genome-wide associa ion s udies. Na . Gene . 47, 291–295 (2015). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:16015 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16015 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions 9