scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

High prevalence of selected viruses and parasites and their predictors in Malawian children

Fan, Y-M,Oikarinen, S,Lehto, K-M,Nurminen, N,Juuti, R,Mangani, C,Maleta, K,Hyöty, H,Ashorn, P

Full text

Epidemiology and Infection cambridge.org/hyg Original Paper Cite this article: Fan Y-M, Oikarinen S, Lehto K-M, Nurminen N, Juuti R, Mangani C, Maleta K, Hyöty H, Ashorn P (2019). High prevalence of selected viruses and parasites and their predictors in Malawian children. Epidemiology and Infection 147,e90,1–9. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0950268819000025 Received: 6 November 2017 Revised: 16 December 2018 Accepted: 1 January 2019 Key words: Infection; parasite; predictor; prevalence; virus Author for correspondence: Y.-M. Fan, E-mail: [email protected] © The Author(s) 2019. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. High prevalence of selected viruses and parasites and their predictors in Malawian children Y.-M. Fan1, S. Oikarinen2, K.-M. Lehto1, N. Nurminen2, R. Juuti3, C. Mangani1,4, K. Maleta4, H. Hyöty2and P. Ashorn1,5 1 Center for Child Health Research, Tampere University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; 2 Department of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland; 3 EPID Research Oy, Espoo, Finland; 4 College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi and 5 Department of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland Abstract Enteric pathogens have been related to child undernutrition. Whereas there are lots of data on enteric bacterial microbiota and infections, much less is known about the incidence of prevalence of intestinal colonisation with viruses or important parasitic species. This study assessed the presence of selected viruses and parasites in stools of 469, 354, 468 Malawian children at 6, 12 and 18 months. We also assessed environmental predictors of the presence of viruses and parasites among 6-month infants. Microbial presence was documented using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Enteroviruses were identified in 68%, 80% and 81% of the stool samples at 6, 12 and 18 months children, rhinovirus in 28%, 18% and 31%, norovirus in 24%, 22% and 16%, parechovirus in 23%, 17% and 17%, rotavirus in 3%, 1% and 0.6%, Giardia lamblia in 9.6%, 23.5% and 26%, and Cryptosporidium (spp.) in 6%, 8% and 2% of the 6, 12 and 18 months stool samples. Dry season (May–October) was associated with a low infection rate of enterovirus, norovirus and Cryptosporidium (spp.). Higher father’s education level, less number of person in the household and higher sanitation were associated with a low infection rate of enterovirus, norovirus and rotavirus, respectively. The results suggest that the prevalence of asymptomatic viral and parasitic infections is high among Malawian children and that the family’s living conditions and seasonality influence the rate of infections. Introduction Stunting, defined as children’s length-for-age or height-for-age, is more than two standard deviations below the World Health Organisation (WHO) Child Growth Standard median. Globally, it is estimated that 165 million children younger than 5 years were affected by stunting in 2011. The prevalence has been decreasing during the past decades, but is still high in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia (36% and 27%) [1]. In childhood, stunting is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality as well as delayed mental and motor development [1]. Impaired early childhood undernutrition in turn has been associated with lower educational achievement, lower adult productivity and earning potential [2]. The most common cause of stunting is believed to be results of inadequate dietary intake, frequent infections or combination of both. In recent years, environmental enteropathy, also known as environmental enteric dysfunction (EED), has been studied as another possible cause [3,4]. This condition is characterised by intestinal inflammation, diffuse villous atrophy and impaired nutrient absorption and growth. It is believed to have an infectious origin [5], but neither antibiotic nor probiotic treatment seems to modify its course [6,7]. Viral and parasitic infections would not be affected by antibacterial interventions but they do cause intestinal inflammation response [8,9]. Furthermore, whole-transcriptome analysis from Malawian children with varying states of EED showed that 57% transcripts with increased expression in EED were reported to respond to viral infection [10]. Viral or parasitic infections of the gastrointestinal tract are also often common but asymptomatic [11–18]; for instance, in a pilot study of 44 6-month-old infants in rural Malawi, we detected enteroviral RNA in 50% of the tested stool samples [19]. The stool samples were collected as part of the same intervention trial as the current study. Given all these findings, it seems plausible that asymptomatic intestinal viral or parasitic infections would be contributing to EED. To get a more comprehensive picture of the frequency of intestinal viral or parasitic infections among children in a low-income setting, we determined the prevalence of five virusesenterovirus, norovirus, rhinovirus, parechovirus, rotavirus and two parasites –Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium species in stools from 6, 12 and 18 months Malawian children. We focused on these pathogens because they are widely spread and reflect the hygienic conditions https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819000025 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Tampere, on 17 Apr 2019 at 09:09:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. where the children are living. As an attempt to identify potential targets for preventive interventions, we also sought to identify major environmental or socio-demographic predictors for being infected with selected viruses or parasites among 6-month infants. Methods Study design, study subjects and ethics This study was a cross-sectional study using data and stool samples that were collected from rural Malawi. The 6-month infants were recruited to a clinical dietary supplementation trial between January 2008 and May 2009, at that point we examined the infants, interviewed their guardians and collected and stored a stool sample from them. The infants were followed up for 12 months and stool samples were also collected when they were 12and 18-month-old. Details of this trial, designated Lungwena Child Nutrition Intervention Study (LCNI-5), have been described elsewhere [20]. In brief, the study population comprised 840 6-month-old infants, who were enrolled to a clinical trial assessing the effect of dietary supplementation with lipid-based nutrient supplements for 12 months on early childhood growth (registration ID: NCT00524446, at https://clinicaltrials.gov/). This trial was conducted in Lungwena and Malindi, two rural Malawian communities. Malindi is about 17 km from Mangochi town and had on average better access to electricity, clean water, sanitation and missionary hospital and a more educated population than Lungwena, a more rural site about 32 km from the town. Both areas are along the shores of Lake Malawi, Malawi. (Fig. 1). The trial adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and regulatory guidelines in Malawi. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants’guardians and the trial protocol was reviewed and approved by the College of Medicine research and ethics committee (University of Malawi) and the ethical committee of the Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Finland. Specimen collection, data collection and storage All stool samples were collected within 14 days after the enrolment. The guardians of the trial participants were given a container to collect the stool samples from the participants, and they brought the sample to the health centre afterwards. We collected data with picture calendar recorded by caretaker (guardian). Throughout the study, the guardians were asked to record on a daily basis the presence or absence of illness symptoms in picture calendars that were provided every 2 weeks. The calendar had separate rows for different days up to 2 weeks and separate columns for the following symptoms: (1) fever; (2) cough; (3) diarrhoea (≥3 stools/d); and (4) other. The first 3 symptom columns had pictures describing them to assist the guardians in identifying the correct area to record the information. The guardian reports on the calendars did not include the recording of temperature for fever or the number of stools for diarrhoea. The recorded information was reviewed and cross-checked by fieldworkers at each 2 weekly food-delivery visit for completeness. Those participants carrying the pathogens but did not have illness symptoms and looked ‘healthy’from their caretakers’views comprised our study subjects. From the information we collected at enrolment, 31 children had diarrhoea in the last 14 days, 22 during the last 7 days and 11 in the last 2 days. The pathogen infections were identified by PCR from stool samples collected at 6, 12 and 18 months. Time between defecation and stool freezing was typically 1– 3 h, maximally 6 h. About 1 g stool sample was aliquoted by a laboratory technician to a screw cap collection tube. The samples were stored for a maximum of 1 week at −20 °C in the study site, 2–4 years at −40 °C at a central laboratory in Mangochi and 2–7 months at −80 °C at the University of Tampere where the analysis was done. The sample shipment from Malawi to Tampere took place in dry ice. Sample preparations, nucleic acid extraction and real-time PCR Frozen stool samples were thawed and processed into 10% (w/v) suspension in HANKS medium containing 0.2% BSA. Nucleic acids were isolated using QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) from the 10% faecal suspension and real-time PCR was used to detect enteroviruses, rhinoviruses, noroviruses, parechoviruses and rotaviruses [21,22] as well as Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium (spp.) parasites as previously reported [23]. The primers and probes used for PCR were shown in supplementary Table S1. For each pathogen, we ran three times PCR and positive was identified if PCR were positive at two or three times. Collection of background information and laboratory tests The data on participants’socioeconomic background were collected through personal interviews during enrolment. At enrolment, the participants’blood haemoglobin concentration was also measured from a venous sample using cuvettes and a reader (HemoCue AB, Angelholm, Sweden). Malaria was diagnosed microscopically from Giemsa stained thick and thin blood films. Each smear was read by two independent microscopists and discordant results were re-read by a third microscopist. Anthropometric measurements Anthropometric measurements were carried out by three trained research assistants during the enrolment visit. Unclothed infants were weighed using an electronic infant weighing scale (SECA 735; Chasmors Ltd, London, England) and weights were recorded to the nearest 10 g. The length was measured to the nearest 1 mm using a high-quality length board (Kiddimetre; Raven Equipment Ltd, Essex, England). Anthropometric indices (weight-for-age Z score = WAZ, length-for-age Zscore = LAZ and weight-for-length Zscore = WLZ) were calculated using WHO Child Growth Standards (2010 STATA igrowup package) [24]. Age for all participants was verified before enrolment objectively by crosschecking documented birth dates in health passports and under-five cards. Statistical analysis Proportions, means and standard deviations (S.D.) were compared between groups by using Student’sttest for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for proportions. Frequencies were used to determine the prevalence of viruses and parasites. Bivariate analysis was used to determine the association between potential predictors including age, sex, growth indexes, age of the main guardian, number of persons and children <5 years of age in household, parents’education level, socioeconomic status, number of animals in the house, anaemia, malaria, source of drinking 2 Y.-M. FAN et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819000025 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Tampere, on 17 Apr 2019 at 09:09:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. water, household sanitation (latrine), site (Lungwena or Malindi), seasonality (dry or rainy season when stool samples were collected) and presence of viruses and parasites. Those predictors that were found to be at the P< 0.1 level were included in the multivariate logistic regression model. Age, sex, socioeconomic status and number of animals in household were forced into the model since they have been found to be significant in the literature and are potential confounders [25–27]. Odds ratios with 95% CI were used to measure the association between predictors and presence of viruses and parasites at statistical significance of P< 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 13.1 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA). Results Characteristics of study subjects Of the 840 LCNI-5 trial participants, we had 506 stored stool samples from 6-month infants. Among them, 37 were found to have diarrhoea at sample collection day and were excluded from this study. There were 11 infants who had diarrhoeal during the past 2 days when the samples were collected. However, these participants were included in the study subjects. Stool samples of 354 and 468 children were available at age of 12 and 18 months, respectively (Fig. 2). At 6 months of age, the mean LAZ, WAZ and WLZ of these participants were −1.65, −0.79 and +0.45, respectively. Approximately 13% of them had malaria parasitaemia in their blood. Infants who participated in the main intervention trial but were not included in this sub-study were on average similar to the included ones, except that they were slightly older and less often enrolled from Lungwena health centre (Table 1). Prevalence of viruses and parasites in stool samples A total of 320 (68.2%), 284 (80.2%) and 380 (81.2%) of the stool samples contained enteroviral RNA at 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively. Rhinovirus was detected in 130 (27.7%), 65 (18.4%) and 146 (31.2%) samples; norovirus in 110 (23.5%), 79 (22.3%) and 74 (15.8%); parechovirus in 106 (22.6%), 60 (17%) and 77 (16.5%); and rotavirus in 15 (3.2%), 4 (1.1%) and 3 (0.6%) samples from 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively (Table 2). A total of 45 (9.6%), 83 (23.5%) and 123 (26.3%) samples were positive for Giardia lamblia and 30 (6.4%), 28 (7.9%) and 9 (1.9%) for Cryptosporidium (spp.) from 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively (Table 2). At least one virus or parasite was detected in 414 (88.3%), 317 (89.5%) and 418 (89.3%) stool samples at 6, 12 and 18 months. Two or more microbes were detected in 234 (49.9%), 188 (53.1%) and 262 (56%) and three or more microbes in 86 (18.3%), 72 (20.7%) and 105 (22.4%) of 6, 12 and 18 months samples. We also used Ct values to classify infections as low (Ct ⩾36), median (30 ⩽Ct ⩽36) and high (Ct < 30) levels. The prevalence of microbes is highest in high infection levels in most of the viruses except rhinovirus in which the low infection level is the highest (data not shown). Fig. 1. Map of study sites (Lungwena and Malindi). Source: Data layer for Africa map downloaded from http://www.thematicmapping.org, 2015 available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License 3.0 (borders may not be completely accurate). All other data layers downloaded from Malawi Spatial Data Portal, 2015 (http://www.masdap.mw). Epidemiology and Infection 3 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819000025 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Tampere, on 17 Apr 2019 at 09:09:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Predictors of viral and parasitic infections at 6-mon infants In bivariate analyses, enterovirus positivity in the stool samples was significantly associated with sanitation (no household latrine use), site (living in Lungwena), lower level of mother’s and father’s education and rainy season (Table 3). In multivariate analysis, seasonality and father’s education level remained significantly associated with enterovirus positivity (Table 3). Infants whose father had a higher level of education were less likely enterovirus positive than those whose father had a lower level of education (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89–0.99, P= 0.031). Infants whose sample was collected during the dry season (May–October) were less likely to be enterovirus positive than those whose sample was collected during the rainy season (November–April) (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43–0.99, P=0.045) (Table 3). Agewas associated with rhinovirus infections in multivariate analysis. Older infants were less likely rhinovirus positive than those young infants (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19–0.99,P= 0.046) (Table 3). The results of norovirus, parechovirus and rotavirus are shown in Table 4. In bivariate analysis,the numberof persons inthe household, mother’s education level, father’s education level, anaemia and rainy season were significantly associated with norovirus presence. Anaemia was associated with parechovirus infections and lower level of sanitation (household latrine use) was associated with rotavirusinfections (Table 4). In multivariate analysis, numberofpersons in the household and seasonality remained significantly associated with norovirus presence; and sanitation with rotavirus presence. The more person living in the house, the more likely infants were to have norovirus infection (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02–1.31, P=0.024). Infants whose sample was collected during the dry season (May– October) were less likely norovirus positive than those whose sample was collected during the rainy season (November–April) (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32–0.86, P= 0.01). Infants whose home did not have latrine had four times higher odds of rotavirus being detected in their stool than those whose home had latrine (OR 4.11,95% CI 1.13–14.88,P= 0.032) (Table 4). For Giardia lamblia infection, the study site and mother’s education level were associated with it in bivariate analysis (P= 0.015 and P= 0.012). In multivariate analysis, both associations were disappeared (P= 0.097 and P= 0.082) (Table 5). Cryptosporidium (spp.) infections were significantly associated with seasonality and WLZ in bivariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, they remained independently associated with Cryptosporidium infections together with gender (Table 5). Infants who had higher WLZ were less likely infected with Cryptosporidium than those with lower WLZ (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39–0.87, P= 0.008). Infants whose samples were collected during the dry season (May–October) were less likely to be infected with Cryptosporidium than those whose samples were collected during the rainy season (November–April) (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.11–0.81, P= 0.018). Girls were more likely infected with Cryptosporidium than boys (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.19–6.88, P= 0.019). Discussion Our study investigated the prevalence of selected common viruses and parasites in a population of asymptomatic 6, 12 and 18Fig. 2. Flow diagram of participant progress throughout the study. CSB, corn-soy blend; LAZ, length-for-age Z-scores; milk-LNS, lipid-based nutrient supplement with milk protein base; soy-LNS, lipid-based nutrient supplement with soy protein base; WFL, weight-for-length. 4 Y.-M. FAN et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819000025 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Tampere, on 17 Apr 2019 at 09:09:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. month-old Malawian children. The study also assessed the environmental predictors of the presence of viruses and parasites among 6-month infants. We found a high prevalence of viral and parasitic infections in these children. Several predictors were found to be associated with the infections including seasonality of sample collection, sanitation conditions and father’s education level. In this study, we used real-time PCR to detect viruses and parasites. Due to the sensitivity of these assays we could detect also low-grade infections which may be common in asymptomatic infants and children. Compared with traditional methods such as cell culture, antigen detection or microscopic examination of viruses or parasites, our results give more representative picture of the epidemiology of these infections including asymptomatic ones. The prevalence of viruses and parasites in our study were much higher than those studies carried out in high-income countries, and more comparable with studies in low-income countries. The enterovirus prevalence in our study was much higher than those reported in Norwegian [28] and Finnish infants [13,29], but more comparable with Mongolia infants [30]. The same trend was for the prevalence of rhinovirus in our study vs. Finnish infants [21,29]; parechovirus vs. Finnish infants [13, 31] and Norwegian infants [32]; norovirus vs. German [33], Korean [34], Cameroonian [12] and South African children [35]. The prevalence of Giardia lamblia in our study was also higher than reported in Bangladeshi healthy infants [36], but quite comparable with Ugandan asymptomatic infants [37]. Cryptosporidium (spp.) prevalence was also higher than previously reported from Spanish [38] and French children [14], and Chinese [15] and Bangladeshi infants [36]. Our results were also comparable with those in MAL-ED and GEMS nondiarrhoeal samples in norovirus [16,18] and Giardia infections [17], but with a lower rate of rotavirus and Cryptosporidium infections in our study [18]. The discrepancy between our findings and those of other studies can to some extent be explained by the use of different methods for detecting the infections. In addition, other factors such as differences in study populations, personal and community hygienic standards, sanitation, climate, home crowding, water and food supplies, socioeconomic condition, seasonal variations, proximity to both domestic and wild animals and a high prevalence of other diseases and conditions such as HIV infection and malnutrition may have influenced the findings in different studies. Only a few studies have investigated the predictors of viral and parasitic infections in healthy infants living in rural low-income settings. Our results are, however, in agreement with previous studies showing seasonality of enterovirus and Cryptosporidium infections [39–41]. There is also some previous evidence from Accra that the use of non-flush toilets is associated with a higher enteroviral isolation rate among healthy infants [39]. The absence of latrines has been associated with diarrhoea incidence also in Vietnam, where rotavirus was the most common causative agent [42]. These findings are consistent with the fecal-oral transmission route for these microbes and suggest that improvements in sanitary conditions might decrease the prevalence of enteric viral infections in rural Malawi. Our study shows the high asymptomatic infections in Malawian children. These children carrying the pathogens did Table 1. Characteristics of participants Study participants (N= 469) Subjects without stool samples or with diarrhoea (N= 371) Pvalue Proportion of boys 47.3% 53.1% 0.110 Mean (S.D.) infant age, months 5.98 (0.25) 6.09 (0.22) <0.001 Mean (S.D.) weight-for-age z-score (WAZ) −0.79 (1.10) −0.79 (1.13) 0.499 Mean (S.D.) length-for-age z-score (LAZ) −1.65 (1.00) −1.66 (1.03) 0.4403 Mean (S.D.) weight-for-length z-score (WLZ) 0.45 (1.02) 0.45 (1.08) 0.473 Mean (S.D.) age of the main guardian, years 28 (9) 28 (10) 0.342 Mean (S.D.) number of persons in household 4.8 (1.8) 4.9 (1.8) 0.196 Mean (S.D.) number of children <5 years of age in household 1.6 (0.7) 1.6 (0.6) 0.145 Mean (S.D.) mothers’education, completed years 3.5 (3.4) 3.6 (3.2) 0.328 Mean (S.D.) fathers’education, completed years 4.1 (3.8) 4.3 (4.0) 0.269 Mean (S.D.) number of economic support person in the family 1.5 (1.1) 1.7 (1.3) 0.076 Mean (S.D.) number of animals in the house 5.9 (10.6) 5.2 (8.0) 0.166 Proportion with moderate anaemia (Hb <80 g/l) 15.0% 14.9% 1.00 Proportion with positive malaria microscopy 13.0% 14.6% 0.539 Proportion with unsafe source of drinking water a 10.2% 6.2% 0.056 Proportion with household latrine 92.8% 93.8% 0.673 Proportion enrolled from Lungwena site 62.9% 48.5% <0.001 Proportion of sample collection at rainy season, November–April 58.4% 53.6% 0.183 S.D., standard deviation. a Source of drinking water from unprotected well, lake or pond. P-value obtained from Student’sttest (continuous variables) or Fisher’s exact test (proportions). Epidemiology and Infection 5 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819000025 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Tampere, on 17 Apr 2019 at 09:09:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. not have clinical symptoms and looked ‘healthy’from their caretakers’views when the stool samples were collected. It is possible that the high prevalence of the asymptomatic infections in these children is due to the frequent exposure to the pathogens which are common in low-income settings. In regards to Cryptosporidium and Giardia lamblia, some species does not infect human and possibly play a role in the high prevalence of parasitic asymptomatic infections in our study. To reduce the Table 3. Bivariate and multivariate analysis of potential predictors for enterovirus and rhinovirus among the participants Enterovirus bivariate Enterovirus multivariate Rhinovirus bivariate Rhinovirus multivariate Variable OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value Age 0.50 (0.23–1.10) 0.084 0.64 (0.27–1.53) 0.32 0.46 (0.20–1.03) 0.06 0.43 (0.19–0.99) 0.046 Gender (girls) 1.15 (0.78–1.69) 0.491 1.19 (0.79–1.79) 0.418 1.11 (0.74–1.67) 0.6 1.16 (0.77–1.76) 0.485 Number of economic support person in the family 1.02 (0.84–1.23) 0.849 1.09 (0.90–1.33) 0.374 1.05 (0.87–1.27) 0.612 1.06 (0.87–1.28) 0.573 Sanitation (no household latrine) 2.72 (1.03–7.20) 0.044 2.40 (0.87–6.59) 0.089 0.68 (0.29–1.62) 0.385 Site (Lungwena) 1.56 (1.05–2.32) 0.028 1.18 (0.75–1.87) 0.467 1.16 (0.76–1.77) 0.49 Number of children < 5 years of age in household 1.28 (0.96–1.71) 0.096 1.19 (0.88–1.59) 0.258 1.12 (0.85–1.47) 0.435 High maternal education level 0.91 (0.86–0.97) 0.002 0.96 (0.89–1.02) 0.208 0.99 (0.93–1.05) 0.665 High parental education level 0.92 (0.87–0.97) 0.001 0.94 (0.89–0.99) 0.031 0.99 (0.94–1.04) 0.664 Season (May–October) 0.64 (0.43–0.95) 0.027 0.65 (0.43–0.99) 0.045 1.04 (0.69–1.57) 0.843 Number of animals in house 0.89 (0.75–1.07) 0.209 1.00 (0.98–1.02) 0.791 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 0.404 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 0.403 CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. Bivariate analysis also included WAZ, LAZ, WLZ, number of persons in household, anaemia, malaria, source of drinking water and age of main guardian (N= 455–469). Table 2. Prevalence of viruses and parasites in 6, 12 and 18-month-old Malawian children Virus/Parasite Age NNof positive % of positive 95% CI Enterovirus 6-month 469 320 68.2 64.0–72.5 12-month 354 284 80.2 76.1–84.4 18-month 468 380 81.2 77.6–84.7 Rhinovirus 6-month 469 130 27.7 23.7–31.8 12-month 354 65 18.4 14.3–22.4 18-month 468 146 31.2 27.0–35.4 Norovirus 6-month 469 110 23.5 19.6–27.3 12-month 354 79 22.3 18.0–26.7 18-month 468 74 15.8 12.5–19.1 Parechovirus 6-month 469 106 22.6 18.8–26.4 12-month 354 60 17.0 13.0–20.9 18-month 468 77 16.5 13.1–19.8 Rotavirus 6-month 469 15 3.2 1.6–4.8 12-month 354 4 1.1 0.02–2.2 18-month 468 3 0.6 −0.08 to 1.4 Giardia lamblia 6-month 469 45 9.6 6.9–12.3 12-month 354 83 23.5 19.0–27.9 18-month 468 123 26.3 22.3–30.3 Cryptosporidium 6-month 469 30 6.4 4.2–8.6 12-month 354 28 7.9 5.1–10.7 18-month 468 9 1.9 0.7–3.2 CI, confidence interval. 6 Y.-M. FAN et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819000025 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Tampere, on 17 Apr 2019 at 09:09:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Table 4. Bivariate and multivariate analysis of potential predictors for norovirus, parechovirus and rotavirus among the participants Norovirus bivariate Norovirus multivariate Parechovirus bivariate Parechovirus multivariate Rotavirus bivariate Rotavirus multivariate Variable OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value Age 1.29 (0.55–3.02) 0.56 1.40 (0.58–3.34) 0.455 1.38 (0.58–3.28) 0.463 1.44 (0.61–3.44) 0.407 0.57 (0.07–4.38) 0.588 0.82 (0.10–6.97) 0.859 Gender (girls) 1.16 (0.75–1.78) 0.503 1.08 (0.68–1.71) 0.753 1.06 (0.69–1.63) 0.795 1.03 (0.65–1.62) 0.902 1.03 (0.37–2.88) 0.958 1.28 (0.43–3.79) 0.652 Number of economic support person in the family 0.98 (0.80–1.21) 0.87 1.07 (0.86–1.34) 0.552 1.05 (0.85–1.28) 0.669 1.10 (0.89–1.35) 0.384 0.93 (0.55–1.57) 0.79 1.00 (0.59–1.71) 0.992 Sanitation (no household latrine) 0.88 (0.37–2.10) 0.778 1.31 (0.59–2.92) 0.503 5.23 (1.57–17.44) 0.007 4.11 (1.13–14.88) 0.032 High maternal education level 0.92 (0.86–0.99) 0.017 0.95 (0.87–1.03) 0.183 1.02 (0.95–1.09) 0.579 0.88 (0.73–1.05) 0.16 High parental education level 0.93 (0.88–0.99) 0.022 0.94 (0.88–1.01) 0.094 1.01 (0.96–1.07) 0.611 0.85 (0.72–1.01) 0.059 0.88 (0.74–1.04) 0.128 Season (May-October) 0.55 (0.35–0.87) 0.01 0.53 (0.32–0.86) 0.01 0.66 (0.42–1.04) 0.072 0.71 (0.44–1.13) 0.149 1.63 (0.58–4.58) 0.352 Number of animals in house 0.98 (0.96–1.01) 0.199 0.98 (0.95–1.01) 0.169 0.99 (0.97–1.02) 0.512 0.99 (0.97–1.02) 0.461 0.95 (0.86–1.05) 0.307 0.96 (0.87–1.06) 0.44 Number of persons in household 1.13 (1.01–1.27) 0.032 1.16 (1.02–1.31) 0.024 1.06 (0.94–1.19) 0.322 0.92 (0.68–1.25) 0.6 Anaemia 0.45 (0.22–0.95) 0.035 0.45 (0.20–1.01) 0.052 0.47 (0.23–0.99) 0.046 0.52 (0.24–1.10) 0.086 1.57 (0.43–5.76) 0.5 CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. Bivariate analysis also included WAZ, LAZ, WLZ, site, number of children <5 years of age in household, age of main guardian and source of drinking water (N= 455–469). Epidemiology and Infection 7 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819000025 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Tampere, on 17 Apr 2019 at 09:09:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. infection rate based on our findings, hygiene, better sanitation especially in the rainy season are important. Taken together, our findings reveal a high prevalence of viruses and parasites in asymptomatic Malawian children. The high prevalence of infection could affect immune response and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, nutritional status and the development of EED. Chronic infections may be asymptomatic in these children. However, the cumulative effect of these infections could be substantial. Future studies are needed to investigate if such infections and specific species of pathogens are associated with the development of EED and eventually lead to growth failure among infants and children in low-income settings. Supplementary material. The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819000025. Author ORCIDs. Y.-M. Fan, 0000-0002-3241-6225 Acknowledgements. We thank the study participants and the staff members of Lungwena Health Centre in Mangochi District for their support and help in the study and Emily McKinney, Marie Hélou, Maria Ovaskainen, Eveliina Jalonen and Basho Poelman for their skilful technical assistance. The LCNI-5 clinical trial was funded by the Academy of Finland (grants 109796 and 127025), with additional funding from the Foundation for Paediatric Research in Finland, the competitive research Funding of the Tampere University Hospital (grants 9H003, 9J006 and 9R005), the US Agency for International Development under terms of cooperative agreement CHN-A00-08-00001-00, through the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance-2 Project managed by the Academy for Educational Development (AED) and the Nutriset Inc. Conflict of interest. None. References 1. Black RE et al.(2013) Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 382, 427–451. 2. Victora CG et al.(2008) Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capital. Lancet 371, 340–357. 3. Keusch GT et al.(2014) Environmental enteric dysfunction: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and clinical consequences. Clinical Infectious Diseases :i an Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 59, S207–S212. 4. Prendergast AJ and Humphrey JH (2014) The stunting syndrome in developing countries. Paediatrics and International Child Health 34, 250–265. 5. Crane RJ, Jones KD and Berkley JA (2015) Environmental enteric dysfunction: an overview. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 36(suppl. 1), S76–S87. 6. Trehan I et al.(2009) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of rifaximin, a nonabsorbable antibiotic, in the treatment of tropical enteropathy. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 104,2326–2333. 7. Galpin L et al.(2005) Effect of Lactobacillus GG on intestinal integrity in Malawian children at risk of tropical enteropathy. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 82, 1040–1045. 8. Goto R, Mascie-Taylor CG and Lunn PG (2009) Impact of intestinal permeability, inflammation status and parasitic infections on infant growth faltering in rural Bangladesh. The British Journal of Nutrition 101, 1509–1516. 9. Prendergast A and Kelly P (2012) Enteropathies in the developing world: neglected effects on global health. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 86, 756–763. 10. Yu J et al.(2015) Environmental enteric dysfunction includes a broad spectrum of inflammatory responses and epithelial repair processes. Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2, 158–174. 11. Amar CF et al.(2007) Detection by PCR of eight groups of enteric pathogens in 4,627 faecal samples: re-examination of the English case-control Infectious Intestinal Disease Study (1993–1996). European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases : Official Publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology 26, 311–323. 12. Ayukekbong J et al.(2011) Enteric viruses in healthy children in Cameroon: viral load and genotyping of norovirus strains. Journal of Medical Virology 83, 2135–2142. 13. Simonen-Tikka ML et al.(2013) Virus infections among young children – the first year of the INDIS study. Journal of Medical Virology 85, 1678– 1684. Table 5. Bivariate and multivariate analysis of potential predictors for Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium among the participants Giardia bivariate Giardia multivariate Cryptosporidium bivariate Cryptosporidium multivariate Variable OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value Age 0.91 (0.27–3.10) 0.882 1.19 (0.35–4.03) 0.781 0.82 (0.19–3.59) 0.795 1.78 (0.43–7.37) 0.424 Gender (girls) 0.93 (0.50–1.73) 0.826 1.01 (0.53–1.89) 0.987 2.20 (0.99–4.91) 0.054 2.86 (1.19–6.88) 0.019 Number of economic support person in the family 0.78 (0.55–1.11) 0.172 0.87 (0.60–1.25) 0.439 1.03 (0.73–1.45) 0.877 1.16 (0.80–1.69) 0.433 Sanitation (no household latrine) 1.30 (0.44–3.89) 0.636 0.43 (0.06–3.26) 0.414 Site (Lungwena) 2.55 (1.20–5.43) 0.015 1.97 (0.88–4.39) 0.097 2.48 (0.99–6.19) 0.052 2.59 (0.97–6.89) 0.057 Number of children <5 years of age in household 1.22 (0.83–1.80) 0.301 0.88 (0.52–1.51) 0.645 High maternal education level 0.87 (0.78–0.97) 0.012 0.90 (0.81–1.01) 0.082 0.95 (0.84–1.07) 0.359 High parental education level 0.94 (0.87–1.03) 0.185 0.97 (0.88–1.08) 0.619 Season (May–October) 0.61 (0.31–1.17) 0.137 0.33 (0.13–0.83) 0.018 0.30 (0.11–0.81) 0.018 Number of animals in house 0.99 (0.95–1.02) 0.489 0.99 (0.95–1.03) 0.644 0.99 (0.94–1.03) 0.537 0.97 (0.91–1.04) 0.393 WLZ 0.96 (0.71–1.30) 0.801 0.68 (0.47–0.99) 0.043 0.58 (0.39–0.87) 0.008 Age of main guardian 1.01 (0.97–1.04) 0.665 1.03 (1.00–1.07) 0.08 1.04 (0.99–1.09) 0.051 CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. Bivariate analysis also included WAZ, LAZ, number of persons in household, anaemia, malaria, and source of drinking water (N= 455–469). 8 Y.-M. FAN et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819000025 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Tampere, on 17 Apr 2019 at 09:09:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. 14. Lacroix C et al.(1987) Cryptosporidium oocysts in immunocompetent children: epidemiologic investigations in the day-care centers of Poitiers, France. European Journal of Epidemiology 3, 381–385. 15. Chen YG et al.(1992) Cryptosporidium infection and diarrhea in rural and urban areas of Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 30, 492–494. 16. Rouhani S et al.(2016) Norovirus infection and acquired immunity in 8 countries: results from the MAL-ED Study. Clinical Infectious Diseases : an Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 62, 1210–1217. 17. Rogawski ET et al.(2017) Determinants and impact of Giardia infection in the first 2 years of life in the MAL-ED Birth Cohort. Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society 6, 153–160. 18. Liu J et al.(2014) Development and assessment of molecular diagnostic tests for 15 enteropathogens causing childhood diarrhoea: a multicentre study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 14, 716–724. 19. Rodriguez-Diaz J et al.(2014) Presence of human enteric viruses in the stools of healthy Malawian 6-month-old infants. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 58, 502–504. 20. Mangani C et al.(2015) Effect of complementary feeding with lipid-based nutrient supplements and corn-soy blend on the incidence of stunting and linear growth among 6to 18-month-old infants and children in rural Malawi. Maternal & Child Nutrition 11(suppl. 4), 132–143. 21. Honkanen H et al.(2013) Human rhinoviruses including group C are common in stool samples of young Finnish children. Journal of Clinical Virology 56, 334–338. 22. Krogvold L et al.(2015) Detection of a low-grade enteroviral infection in the islets of langerhans of living patients newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 64, 1682–1687. 23. Nurminen N et al.(2015) High-throughput multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction method for Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium Species detection in stool samples. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 92, 1222–1226. 24. World Health Organization (WHO) (2010) Anthro for personal computers, version 3.2.2, 2011: Software for assessing growth and development of the world’s children. Available at http://www.who.int/childgrowth/ software/en/ (Accessed 20 February 2011). 25. Jenista JA, Powell KR and Menegus MA (1984) Epidemiology of neonatal enterovirus infection. The Journal of Pediatrics 104, 685–690. 26. Green MS (1992) The male predominance in the incidence of infectious diseases in children: a postulated explanation for disparities in the literature. International Journal of Epidemiology 21, 381–386. 27. Traub RJ et al.(2004) Epidemiological and molecular evidence supports the zoonotic transmission of Giardia among humans and dogs living in the same community. Parasitology 128, 253–262. 28. Cinek O et al.(2006) Longitudinal observation of enterovirus and adenovirus in stool samples from Norwegian infants with the highest genetic risk of type 1 diabetes. Journal of Clinical Virology 35,33–40. 29. Salminen KK et al.(2004) Isolation of enterovirus strains from children with preclinical Type 1 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine : a Journal of the British Diabetic Association 21, 156–164. 30. Kuramitsu M et al.(2005) Non-polio enterovirus isolation among families in Ulaanbaatar and Tov province, Mongolia: prevalence, intrafamilial spread, and risk factors for infection. Epidemiology and Infection 133, 1131–1142. 31. Kolehmainen P et al.(2012) Human parechoviruses are frequently detected in stool of healthy Finnish children. Journal of Clinical Virology 54, 156–161. 32. Tapia G et al.(2008) Longitudinal observation of parechovirus in stool samples from Norwegian infants. Journal of Medical Virology 80, 1835– 1842. 33. Karsten C et al.(2009) Incidence and risk factors for community-acquired acute gastroenteritis in north-west Germany in 2004. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases : Official Publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology 28, 935–943. 34. Cheon DS et al.(2010) Seasonal prevalence of asymptomatic norovirus infection in Korean children. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 7, 1427–1430. 35. Mattison K et al.(2010) Molecular detection and characterization of noroviruses from children in Botswana. Journal of Medical Virology 82, 321–324. 36. Haque R et al.(2009) Prospective case-control study of the association between common enteric protozoal parasites and diarrhea in Bangladesh. Clinical Infectious Diseases: an Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 48, 1191–1197. 37. Ankarklev J et al.(2012) Common coinfections of Giardia intestinalis and Helicobacter pylori in non-symptomatic Ugandan children. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6, e1780. 38. Garcia-Rodriguez JA et al.(1990) The prevalence of Cryptosporidium species in children in day care centres and primary schools in Salamanca (Spain): an epidemiological study. European Journal of Epidemiology 6, 432–435. 39. Otatume S and Addy P (1975) Ecology of enteroviruses in tropics. I. Circulation of enteroviruses in healthy infants in tropical urban area. Japanese Journal of Microbiology 19, 201–209. 40. Molbak K et al.(1993) Cryptosporidiosis in infancy and childhood mortality in Guinea Bissau, West Africa. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 307, 417–420. 41. Newman RD et al.(1999) Longitudinal study of Cryptosporidium infection in children in northeastern Brazil. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 180, 167–175. 42. Vu Nguyen T et al.(2006) Etiology and epidemiology of diarrhea in children in Hanoi, Vietnam. International Journal of Infectious Diseases: IJID : Official Publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases 10, 298–308. Epidemiology and Infection 9 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819000025 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Tampere, on 17 Apr 2019 at 09:09:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.