scieee Open visual document viewer

The pentafluorophenyl group as π-acceptor for anions : a case study

Giese, Michael,Albrecht, Markus,Valkonen, Arto,Rissanen, Kari

Full text

This is an elec onic ep in o he o iginal a icle. This ep in may di e om he o iginal in pagina ion and ypog aphic de ail. Au ho (s): Ti le: Yea : Ve sion: Please ci e he o iginal e sion: All ma e ial supplied ia JYX is p o ec ed by copy igh and o he in ellec ual p ope y igh s, and duplica ion o sale o all o pa o any o he eposi o y collec ions is no pe mi ed, excep ha ma e ial may be duplica ed by you o you esea ch use o educa ional pu poses in elec onic o p in o m. You mus ob ain pe mission o any o he use. Elec onic o p in copies may no be o e ed, whe he o sale o o he wise o anyone who is no an au ho ised use . The pen a luo ophenyl g oup as π-accep o o anions : a case s udy Giese, Michael; Alb ech , Ma kus; Valkonen, A o; Rissanen, Ka i Giese, M., Alb ech , M., Valkonen, A., & Rissanen, K. (2015). The pen a luo ophenyl g oup as π-accep o o anions : a case s udy. Chemical Science, 6(1), 354-359. h ps://doi.o g/10.1039/C4SC02762K 2015 The pen afluo ophenyl g oup as p-accep o o anions: a case s udy†‡ Michael Giese, a Ma kus Alb ech ,* a A o Valkonen b and Ka i Rissanen* b The p esen s udy gi es a comp ehensi e insigh in o anion–pin e ac ions in he solid s a e, ocusing on pu ely o ganic and cha ge-neu al fluo ophenyl g oups bea ing a posi i e cha ge loca ed a a side chain. The de ailed s a is ical analysis o a se ies o s uc u al da a se s shows he geome ical a iabili y o anion–pbonding in he solid s a e. I e eals he di ec ing subs i uen s a he a ene as key elemen s o he posi ional p e e ences o anions abo e p-sys ems. The s uc u al a ie y o he in e ac ion be ween anions and elec on-deficien a enes is conside ed by use o he hap ici y concep . Toge he wi h new e alua ion c i e ia, wo help ul ools o unde s and and desc ibe anion–pin e ac ions in he solid a e used. In oduc ion Sup amolecula chemis y is dened as he chemis y o non- co alen in e ac ions. Due o hei b oad e sa ili y ( om weak an de Waals in e ac ions o hyd ogen bonding and s ong elec os a ic a ac ions) hey a y d ama ically in hei ene - ge ics. 1 Oen non-co alen in e ac ions a e weak compa ed o co alen bonds. Howe e , due o coope a i e and addi i e effec s hey a e able o con ol molecula o ganiza ion and assembly p ocesses and o m s able sup amolecula agg ega es. Ano he impo an ea u e o non-co alen in e ac ions, e e sibili y and sensi i i y o ex e nal s imuli p o ide he abili y o co ec e o s in he assembly, sel -heal s uc u al dis u bances, and c ea e new unc ional ma e ials. 2 Only ecen ly he in e ac ion be ween anions and elec on- decien a enes has gained conside able a en ion, due o i s po en ial applica ion in anion sensing, ecogni ion p ocesses and ele ance in enzyme ac i i y. 3 Since 2002 his in e molec- ula o ce is widely accep ed as an inuen ial a ac i e in e - ac ion. 3,4 A se ies o compu a ional as well as s uc u al s udies suppo he “exis ence”o anion–pin e ac ions based on mo e o less a bi a y e alua ion c i e ia. 3,5 Thus, anion–pin e ac- ions we e conside ed o be “commonplace”. In 2009 Hay and Cus elcean epo ed an analysis o he o ien a ion o anions owa ds p-sys ems using he Camb idge S uc u al Da abase (CSD). 6 The s ic c i e ia o anion–pin e ac ions selec ed in his s udy e oked a con o e sial discussion, since i did no e eal a single example o such an in e ac ion in he CSD. 7 Since 2008, we in es iga e anion–pin e ac ions o pen a- uo ophenyl de i a i es. 8 Due o he elec on wi hd awing na u e o he uo ine a om his g oup shows an opposi e cha ge dis ibu ion compa ed o co esponding phenyl de i a i es. Only ew examples by o he g oups we e epo ed whe e his a oma ic moie y was used o anion–ps udies (see Fig. 1). 9 In compa ison o many p e ious in es iga ions, a se o e ms and condi ions we e chosen o sys ema ically unde s and he in e ac ion be ween anions and elec on decien a enes: Fig. 1 Pen afluo ophenyl ecep o s o Reedijk (1), 9a Ghosh (2), 9b,c Johnson (3), 9d Maeda (4) 9e–g as well as Mizuse 9h,i and Webe (5) 9j o “anion–pin e ac ion s udies”in he c ys al, solu ion o in he gas phase. a Ins i u ¨ u O ganische Chemie, RWTH Aachen Uni e si y, Landol weg 1, 52074 Aachen, Ge many. E-mail: [email p o ec ed]w h-aachen.de b Depa men o Chemis y, Nanoscience Cen e , Uni e si y o Jy ¨ askyl¨ a, Su on ie 9, 40014 Jy ¨ askyl¨ a, Finland. E-mail: ka i. . issanen@jyu.; Fax: +358 14 260 2501; Tel: +358 50 562 3721 †This manusc ip is dedica ed o P o . Jean-Ma ie Lehn on he occasion o his 75 h bi hday. ‡Elec onic supplemen a y in o ma ion (ESI) a ailable. CCDC 967089, 967097, 1005267–1005289. Fo ESI and c ys allog aphic da a in CIF o o he elec onic o ma see DOI: 10.1039/c4sc02762k Ci e his: Chem. Sci.,2015,6,354 Recei ed 9 h Sep embe 2014 Accep ed 3 d Oc obe 2014 DOI: 10.1039/c4sc02762k www. sc.o g/chemicalscience 354 |Chem. Sci.,2015,6, 354–359 This jou nal is © The Royal Socie y o Chemis y 2015 Chemical Science EDGE ARTICLE Open Access A icle. Published on 16 Oc obe 2014. Downloaded on 18/01/2016 06:16:06. This a icle is licensed unde a C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 3.0 Unpo ed Licence. View A icle Online View Jou nal | View Issue (1) The cha ge neu al pen auo ophenyl uni (C 6 F 5 ) was chosen as elec on decien moie y in o de o ule ou ha he in e ac ion be ween he p-sys em and he anion is mainly based on elec os a ic a ac ion which o e ules a possible weak epulsion be ween he a oma ic uni and he anion. (2) A posi i e cha ge was es ablished a he subs i uen o he C 6 F 5 g oup ei he di ec ly bound o he ing o sepa a ed by a space . This gua an ees he p esence o an anion in he icini y o he elec on decien moie y. Resul s Ou p esen s udy is in he way unique, as i analyses a huge da a se o expe imen ally ob ained s uc u es o pu ely o ganic p-accep o complexes o uo oa enes (pe uo ina ed o pa ly uo ina ed) wi h a ious anions. In con as o p e ious epo s, he ocus is on he in e ac ion o anions wi h uncha ged p-sys ems. The ole o he anion as well as o di ec ing subs i uen s in he pe iphe y o he elec on decien a ene is in es iga ed. In his wo k, he posi ions o 101 anions ob ained a e sys ema ically compa ed om 80 c ys al s uc u es de e - mined by us, 25 in his wo k (see ESI‡), he emaining 55 being published ea lie , 8 wi h he aim o ge a comp ehensi e pic u e o he e sa ili y o anion–pcon ac s in he solid s a e (see Fig. 2). C i e ia o desc ibe in e ac ions be ween anions and p- sys ems In o de o ge an o e iew o he in es iga ed s uc u es, he posi ions o 101 anions (8 chlo ide, 58 b omide, 17 iodide and 17 s uc u es wi h o he anions such as e auo obo a e, hex- auo ophospha e o ni a e) we e plo ed in a no malized coo dina e sys em. The eby, he uo ina ed phenyl g oup is loca ed in he xz-plane wi h i s cen e in he ze o poin . The g aphical analysis (Fig. 3) shows ha he majo i y o he anions (91, 89%) a e loca ed abo e (o below) he plane o he a ene (on- op posi ion). Only 11 anions a e ound in he ou e pe iphe y o he a ene (side-on posi ion). In hose examples, ei he coc ys allized sol en molecules o ce he anions away om he op o he p-sys em o hey a e bound o o ho- hyd ogen a oms o pa ially uo ina ed a enes ( ew examples o C 6 HF 4 ,C 6 H 2 F 3 ,C 6 H 3 F 2 de i a i es a e included in he e). 8e Anions loca ed on- op o he p-sys em show a b oad posi ional dis ibu ion abo e he plane o he a ene wi h a ocus o he densi y o he anions nea he cen e o he a oma ic uni . As men ioned in he in oduc ion, anion–pin e ac ions in he solid s a e a e ega ded as ei he “commonplace o ex ao dina y”depending on he selec ed e alua ion c i e ia. In he e diffe en epo ed c i e ia we e applied on he collec ed s uc u al da a se . The ea ly c i e ia o Dey` ae al. (2002: dis ance be ween a ene-ca bon a oms and anion <P dW + 1.0 ˚ A) 5b and Reedijk and cowo ke s (2008: dis ance be ween cen e o a ene, any o he a ene a oms and he anion <P4.0 ˚ A) 10 lead o 54 o 40 hi s, espec i ely, o halide con aining anion–p agg ega es. Mo e es ic ed e alua ion c i e ia by Hay and Cus elcean (2009: dis ance be ween each a ene-ca bon a om and anion <P dW + 0.2 ˚ A) 6 do no lead o any anion–pcon ac in he analysis o he pen auo ophenyl sys em. In 2011 Dey` a and cowo ke s epo ed modied c i e ia o anion–pin e ac- ions conside ing he s uc u al a iabili y o he ela i e posi- ion o he anion abo e he p-sys em (dis ance be ween a ene- ca bon a oms and anion <P dW + 0.8 ˚ A). 7 This leads o 36 hi s o anion–pcomplexes wi hin he p esen s udy. Since c ys al s uc u es a e he esul o a complex in e play o non-co alen in e ac ions as packing effec s anions migh be o ced in un a ou able posi ions in he c ys al la ice. Based on his, he ini ial 2002 c i e ia o Dey` a seem o be oo loosely selec ed. On he o he hand, anion–pin e ac ions easily can be inuenced by o he non-co alen in e ac ions. Due o di ec ing effec s o he subs i uen s a he uo oa ene he posi ion abo e he cen e o he p-sys em does no ha e o be he mos a ou able one o he anion. The e o e, Hay's 2009 c i e ia would be co ec , i he in e ac ion would ha e a high co alen con ibu ion. Howe e , anion–pin e ac ions a e mainly based Fig. 2 Rep esen a i e s uc u es o pen afluo ophenyl ecep o s 6–10 in he c ys al discussed in he p esen s udy showing he e sa ili y o anion–pcomplexes as obse ed in he solid s a e (C: g ey, F: yellow, Cl: g een, B : ed, I: pink; co-c ys allized sol en molecules and coun e ca ions a e omi ed o cla i y). 8b,e, ,i Fig. 3 G aphical analysis o 101 anion posi ions in espec o a no malized (pen a)fluo oa ene. (A) Top iew; (B) side iew (C: g ey, F: yellow, Cl: g een, B : ed, I: pink, o he anions (e.g. BF 4  ,PF 6  ,NO 3  , I 3  , B IB  ,I 42 ): ligh g een). This jou nal is © The Royal Socie y o Chemis y 2015 Chem. Sci.,2015,6, 354–359 | 355 Edge A icle Chemical Science Open Access A icle. Published on 16 Oc obe 2014. Downloaded on 18/01/2016 06:16:06. This a icle is licensed unde a C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 3.0 Unpo ed Licence. View A icle Online on non-di ec ed elec os a ic a ac ion. Consequen ly, he in e ac ion o molecula species wi h a p-sys em should no be es ic ed o he posi ion di ec ly abo e he cen e o an a ene and he exac sum o an de Waals adii is no a sufficien c i e ion o e alua e anion–pcon ac s. Fo example, ca ion–p in e ac ions o phenyl g oups can span he whole ange om h 1 o h 6 . Based on his, a deni ion o anion–pin e ac ions using he “hap ici y concep ”in combina ion wi h newly adjus ed c i e ia a e ecommended in he e: (1) The anion has o be loca ed abo e he p-sys em. The e- o e, any cen oid- ing a om–anion angle should no be highe han 90(+10% o ole ance). (2) The dis ance be ween he anion and he plane o he p-sys em has o be sho e han P dW + 0.4 ˚ A ( he p oblem o a xed numbe o he dW adii o halogen anions is discussed in e . 7). (3) The hap ici y o he anion–pin e ac ions is gi en by he numbe o con ac s o ing a oms which a e <P dW + 0.4 ˚ A. The main ex o he a icle should go he e wi h headings as app op ia e. An al e na i e o epo he hap ici y would be o lis he “offse ”o he anion om he cen e o he a oma ic uni in o de o desc ibe he ela i e posi ion o he anion o he a oma ic ing, which is easy o quan i y. Howe e , o us he simple hap ici y seems o be mo e desc ip i e and easie compa able. The e alua ion c i e ia p oposed in he e a e based on ou expe ience wi h solid s a e anion–pin e ac ions. Fo an a ac i e in e ac ion be ween an anion and an elec on- decien a ene he anion has o be loca ed on op o he a ene (c i e ion 1) in close p oximi y o he a ene plane (c i e ion 2). The 0.4 ˚ A which a e added o he dW adii a e due o a ecen adjus men o he abula ed dW adii o halide anions as epo ed by Dey` a and cowo ke s in 2011. 7 The nal c i e ion in oduces a ool o desc ibe he e sa ili y o anion–pin e ac ions in he solid s a e by a simple conside a ion o he gi en a ene a om/anion dis ances. Selec ed c ys al s uc u es The dened c i e ia will be illus a ed by he c ys al s uc u es o he chlo ide 11, he iodide 12 as well as he b omide sal s 13– 15 ep esen ed in Fig. 4. The de i a i es bea diffe en ca ionic uni s (ammonium e sus imidazolium e sus aminopy idinium) in he side chain. In he discussion o he c ys al s uc u es only ele an dis ances and in e ac ions will be desc ibed al hough he e a e many mo e p esen . The c ys al s uc u e o 11 ep esen s he ideal case o anion– pcon ac s (see Fig. 5). The chlo ide is xed di ec ly on op o he cen e o he pen auo ophenyl uni by wo non-classical hyd ogen bonds o he wo me hyl g oups (CH/Cl ¼2.92, 2.94 ˚ A). All six ca bon/anion dis ances ma ch ou c i e ia (C1–C6 ¼ 3.50–3.83 ˚ A) esul ing in he “h 6 ”- ype in e ac ion. Howe e , he sho es non-co alen con ac s in he solid s a e s uc u e o 11 a e obse ed be ween he anion and he coc ys allized wa e (HOH/Cl ¼2.43 ˚ A). The closely ela ed s uc u e o compound 12 is shown in Fig. 6. Iodide is loca ed close o he ca ionic ammonium g oup as well as o he pen auo ophenyl p-accep o . In e ac ion wi h he e ae hylammonium uni akes place by non-classical hyd ogen bonds be ween iodide and a-CH o wo e hyl g oups (CH/I¼3.17, 3.22 ˚ A). The iodide is loca ed close o he cen e o he pen auo ophenyl uni wi h dis ances o ca bon a oms o 4.10 (C1), 4.07/4.05 (C2/C6), 3.98/3.99 (C3/C5) and 3.94 ˚ A (C4). The dis ance be ween iodide and C1 sligh ly exceeds ou limi esul ing in a “h 5 ” ype a angemen . Howe e , due o he Fig. 4 Selec ed examples o pen afluo ophenyl de i a i es wi h diffe en ca ionic side chains. Fig. 5 S uc u e o 11 in he c ys al exhibi ing he h 6 in e ac ion be ween he pen afluo ophenyl g oup and chlo ide. The co-c ys al- lized wa e was omi ed o cla i y. Fig. 6 S uc u e o 12 in he c ys al exhibi ing he h 5 in e ac ion be ween he pen afluo ophenyl g oup and iodide. 356 |Chem. Sci.,2015,6, 354–359 This jou nal is © The Royal Socie y o Chemis y 2015 Chemical Science Edge A icle Open Access A icle. Published on 16 Oc obe 2014. Downloaded on 18/01/2016 06:16:06. This a icle is licensed unde a C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 3.0 Unpo ed Licence. View A icle Online bulkiness o he ammonium subs i uen , he anion is some- wha shied om he cen e owa ds C4 p ohibi ing “h 6 ”. The ele an anion ca ion pai o 13 as ound in he c ys al is depic ed in Fig. 7. The imidazoline plane is somewha il ed agains he C1–C4 axis o he uo ina ed phenyl g oup wi h he CH]CH uni poin ing owa ds he elec on decien ing. Imidazoline-CH in 5-posi ion binds o he b omide anion (H/ B ¼2.77 ˚ A). Dis ances be ween b omide and he ing ca bon a oms a e 4.04 (C1), 3.91 (C2), 3.65 (C3), 3.46 (C4), 3.59 (C5) and 3.87 ˚ A (C6). The in e ac ion o C1 clea ly exceeds ou limi and he s uc u e again can be desc ibed o be h 5 . In o de o show he e sa ili y o obse ed anion–pcon ac s in he p esen solid s a e s udy we depic in addi ion he c ys al s uc u e o 14 (Fig. 8). Simila o he s uc u es o 11 and 12 he b omide is xed by non-classical hyd ogen bonds o he alkyl g oups close o he pen auo ophenyl sys em (CH/B ¼3.41, 3.71 ˚ A). Howe e , in con as o he s uc u es desc ibed abo e, he anion is shied owa ds he im o he p-sys em leading o ou C/B dis ances wi hin he applied e alua ion c i e ia (C3–C6 ¼3.92, 3.54, 3.43 and 3.70 ˚ A) esul ing in a “h 4 ”- ype a angemen o he anion ela i e o he elec on-decien a ene. S uc u e 15 is e y diffe en (Fig. 9). The 2-aminopy idin subs i uen is o ien a ed wi h he amino g oup away om he pen auo ophenyl moie y. The amine unde goes hyd ogen bonds o b omide anions which a e no ele an o he p esen discussion. The in e ac ion o H6 o he py idine o b omide (2.77 ˚ A) is ele an . I di ec s he anion o e he a oma ic uni , no a he cen e bu a he im. Ca bon b omide dis ances a e 4.33 (C1), 3.69 (C2), 3.60 (C3), 4.15 (C4), 4.73 (C5), and 4.80 ˚ A showing clea ly he h 2 mode o in e ac ion. In e ac ions o halides wi h pen auo ophenyl de i a i es Due o he sphe ical shape and easy de e mina ion o hei posi ion, halides a e ideal anions o analyze anion–pin e ac- ions. The e o e he ollowing discussion will ocus on his class o anions. Applying hose c i e ia o ou da a se leads o 48 anion–p con ac s o he halide s uc u es con aining pen auo ophenyl uni . A summa y o he s uc u al ndings depending on he applied sea ch c i e ia is gi en in Table 1. In o de o e alua e he posi ion o he anion in espec o he p-sys em, he “hap ici y”( he numbe o easonable bonding con ac s be ween an anion and ca bon a oms o he a ene) was de e mined (Fig. 10). In eigh cases he anions a e loca ed close o he cen e o he a ene and ma ching he c i e ia o all six ca bon a oms, hus hey show a h 6 - ype binding mo i . Howe e , he majo i y o anions (40 anions) in e ac s pa ially wi h he elec on-decien p-sys em (h 1 –h 5 binding) and, in e es ingly, in only wo s uc u es he anion is loca ed close o only one ca bon a om o he pen auo ophenyl uni . The s uc u al compa ison o he c ys allog aphic da a e eals a signican inuence o he scaffold o med by he subs i uen o he p-accep o s. Those s uc u es whe e he side g oup o he p-accep o (i) is igid, (ii) does no in oduce dissymme y and (iii) any dis u bing coc ys allized sol en molecules a e absen (see 6, Fig. 2 as a ep esen a i e example o an example) lead o ou een hi s wi hin ou collec ion o da a wi h anions loca ed close abo e he cen e o he elec on- decien a ene (see Fig. 11a and b). In con as o ha , Fig. 8 Solid s a e s uc u e o 14 illus a ing he h 4 - ype a angemen o he b omide ela i e o he pen afluo ophenyl uni . Fig. 9 S uc u e o 15 in he c ys al exhibi ing he h 2 in e ac ion be ween he pen afluo ophenyl g oup and b omide. Table 1 Anion–pcon ac s o in es iga ed halide de i a i es in espec o he applied e alua ion c i e ia Reedijk e al. 2008 ( e . 10) Hay e al. 2009 ( e . 6) Dey` ae al. 2002 ( e . 5b) Dey` ae al.2011 ( e . 7) This s udy 2014 Cl 3 0 3 3 6 B 33 0 35 25 29 I 11 0 16 8 13 P47 0 54 36 48 Fig. 7 S uc u e o 13 in he c ys al exhibi ing he h 5 in e ac ion be ween he pen afluo ophenyl g oup and b omide. This jou nal is © The Royal Socie y o Chemis y 2015 Chem. Sci.,2015,6, 354–359 | 357 Edge A icle Chemical Science Open Access A icle. Published on 16 Oc obe 2014. Downloaded on 18/01/2016 06:16:06. This a icle is licensed unde a C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 3.0 Unpo ed Licence. View A icle Online co esponding s uc u es wi h mo e exible and less symme ic scaffolds (see 7, Fig. 2 as a ep esen a i e example) show a signican ly b oade dis ibu ion o he anion posi ion abo e he ing (see Fig. 11c and d o an example). This obse a ion suppo s ou p e ious sugges ion ha he posi ion o he anion in espec o he p-acidic uni s ongly depends on he subs i uen s in he pe iphe y o he a ene and can be con olled by hose. 8a,b Conclusions In conclusion, he p esen ed s a is ical app oached based on sys ema ically ob ained expe imen al da a, in es iga es me al- ee and cha ge-neu al uo ophenyl de i a i es in espec o hei p-accep o abili y o anions. Posi i e cha ge is only in oduced in he pe iphe y o he a ene side chains. The esul s clea ly show ha anions p e e he posi ion abo e he elec on- decien p-sys em (nea ly 90%). The high a iabili y o he anion posi ion is caused by in e play o a ious non-co alen in e ac ions. The eby, di ec ing subs i uen s a he uo oa ene play a key ole. The in oduced concep o hap ici y as well as he p oposed e alua ion c i e ia a e help ul o sufficien ly desc ibe anion–pin e ac ions in he c ys al. Acknowledgemen s We hank he Fonds de Chemischen Indus ie (MA) and he Academy o Finland (KR, p oj. nos 263256 and 265328) o nancial suppo . No es and e e ences 1(a) J.-M. Lehn, Sup amolecula Chemis y –Concep s and Pe spec i es, VCH, Weinheim, 1995; (b) J. S eed and J. L. A wood, Sup amolecula Chemis y, John Wiley, New Yo k, 2009. 2(a) J. Ruokolainen, R. M¨ akinen, M. To kkeli, T. M¨ akel¨ a, R. Se imaa, G. en B inke and O. Ikkala, Science, 1998, 280, 557; (b) T. Ka o, N. Mizoshi a and K. Kishimo o, Angew. Chem., In . Ed., 2006, 45, 38; (c) E. K ieg and B. Ryb chinski, Chem.–Eu . J., 2011, 17, 9016; (d) K. Liu, Y. Kang, Z. Wang and X. Zhang, Ad . Ma e ., 2013, 25, 5530; (e) X.-Y. Hu, T. Xiao, C. Lin, F. Huang and L. Wang, Acc. Chem. Res., 2014, 47, 2041. 3(a) A. Bianchi, K. Bowman-James and E. Ga cia-Espana, Sup amolecula Chemis y o Anions, Wiley-VCH, New Yo k, 1997; (b) P. Balles e , S uc . Bonding, 2008, 129, 127; (c) B. L. Scho el, H. T. Chi o ides and K. R. Dunba , Chem. Soc. Re ., 2008, 37, 68; (d) O. B. Be yman, V. S. B yanse , D. P. S ay, D. W. Johnson and B. P. Hay, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 48; (e) B. P. Hay and V. S. B yan se , Chem. Commun., 2008, 2417; ( ) P. Gamez, T. J. Mooib oek, S. J. Tea and J. Reedijk, Acc. Chem. Res., 2007, 40, 435; (g) A. Robe azzi, F. K ull, E.-W. Knapp and P. Gamez, C ys EngComm, 2011, 13, 3293; (h) T. J. Mooib oek and P. Gamez, C ys EngComm, 2012, 14, 3902; (i) C. Es a ellasm, A. F on e a, D. Quinone o and P. M. Dey` a, Angew. Chem., In . Ed., 2011, 50, 415; (j) A. Bauz´ a, D. Quinone o, P. M. Dey` a and A. F on e a, Chem.–Eu . J., 2014, 20, 6985. 4 H.-J. Schneide , F. We ne and T. Bla e , J. Phys. O g. Chem., 1993, 6, 590. 5(a) K. Hi oaka, S. Mizuse and S. Yamabe, J. Phys. Chem., 1987, 91, 5294; (b) D. Quinone o, C. Ga au, C. Ro ge , A. F on e a, P. Balles e , A. Cos a and O. M. Dey` a, Angew. Chem., In . Ed., 2002, 41, 3389; (c) D. Quinone o, A. Cos a, P. Balles e , A. Cos a and P. M. Dey` a, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2005, 109, 4632; (d) A. F on e a, D. Quinone o, A. Cos a, P. Balles e and P. M. Dey` a, New J. Chem., 2007, 31, 556; (e) S. Demeshko, S. Deche and F. Meye , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 4508; ( ) C. S. Campos-Fe n´ andez, B. L. Scho el, H. T. Chi o ides, J. K. Be a, J. Bacsa, J. M. Koomen, D. H. Russell and K. R. Dunba , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 12909; (g) B. L. Scho el, J. Bacsa and K. R. Dunba , Chem. Commun., Fig. 10 S uc u al analysis o he halides loca ed abo e he elec on- deficien p-sys ems acco ding o he binding mo i . Fig. 11 Compa a i e, g aphical analysis o s uc u es o p-accep o s wi h a symme ical, igid scaffold and wi hou coc ys allized sol en molecules; (a) op iew; (b) side iew, as well as o mo e flexible and less symme ic scaffolded accep o sys ems; (c) op iew and (d) side iew (C: g ey, F: yellow, Cl: g een, B : ed, I: pink, o he anions (BF 4  and PF 6  a e included in addi ion o he halides): ligh g een). 358 |Chem. Sci.,2015,6, 354–359 This jou nal is © The Royal Socie y o Chemis y 2015 Chemical Science Edge A icle Open Access A icle. Published on 16 Oc obe 2014. Downloaded on 18/01/2016 06:16:06. This a icle is licensed unde a C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 3.0 Unpo ed Licence. View A icle Online 2005, 46; (h) B. L. Scho el, H. T. Chi o ides, M. Sha uk, A. Chouai, J. Bacsa, L. M. P´ e ez and K. R. Dunba , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 5895; (i) S. Fu kawa, T. Okubo, S. Masaoka, D. Tanaka, H. Chang and S. Ki agawa, Angew. Chem., In . Ed., 2005, 44, 2700; (j) P. U. Maheswa i, B. Modec, A. Pe ec, B. Kozle ca , C. Masse a, P. Gamez and J. Reedijk, Ino g. Chem., 2006, 45, 6637; (k) H. Casellas, C. Masse a, F. Buda, P. Gamez and J. Reedijk, New J. Chem., 2006, 30, 1561; (l) A. Gals yan, P. J. S. Miguel and B. Lippe , Chem.–Eu . J., 2010, 16, 5577; (m) Fo a ecen in es iga ion o he modynamics o anion–pin e ac ion using e.g. C 6 F 5 uni s see: L. Ad ienssens, G. Gil-Rami ez, A. F on e a, D. Quinone o, E. C. Escude o-Adan and P. Balles e , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 3208. 6 B. P. Hay and R. Cus elcean, C ys . G ow h Des., 2009, 9, 2539. 7 C. Es a ellas, A. Bauz´ a, A. F on e a, D. Quinone o and P. M. Dey` a, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, 5696. 8(a) M. Alb ech , C. Wessel, M. de G oo , K. Rissanen and A. L¨ uchow, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 4600; (b) M. Alb ech , M. M¨ ulle , O. Me gel, K. Rissanen and A. Valkonen, Chem.–Eu . J., 2010, 16, 5062; (c)M.M ¨ ulle , M. Alb ech , V. Gossen, T. Pe e s, A. Hoffmann, G. Raabe, A. Valkonen and K. Rissanen, Chem.–Eu . J., 2010, 16, 12446; (d)M.M ¨ ulle , M. Alb ech , J. Sackmann, A. Hoffmann, F. Die kes, A. Valkonen and K. Rissanen, Dal on T ans., 2010, 11329; (e) M. Giese, M. Alb ech , C. Bannwa h, G. Raabe, A. Valkonen and K. Rissanen, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 8542; ( ) M. Giese, M. Alb ech , K. Wieme , G. Kubik, A. Valkonen and K. Rissanen, Eu . J. Ino g. Chem., 2012, 2995; (g) M. Giese, M. Alb ech , K. Wieme , A. Valkonen and K. Rissanen, New J. Chem., 2012, 1368; (h) M. Giese, M. Alb ech , G. I ano a, A. Valkonen and K. Rissanen, Sup amol. Chem., 2012, 1, 48; (i) M. Giese, M. Alb ech , T. Repenko, J. Sackmann, A. Valkonen and K. Rissanen, Eu . J. O g. Chem., 2014, 2435. 9(a)R.J.G ¨ o z, A. Robe azzi, I. Mu ikainen, U. Tu peinen, P. Gamez and J. Reedijk, Chem. Commun., 2008, 3384; (b) P. S. Lakshmina ayanan, I. Ra ikuma , E. Su esh and P. Ghosh, Ino g. Chem., 2007, 46, 4769; (c) I. Ra ikuma , P. S. Lakshmina ayanan, M. A unachalam, E. Su esh and P. Ghosh, Dal on T ans., 2009, 4160; (d) O. B. Be yman, F. Ho , M. J. Hynes and D. W. Johnson, Chem. Commun., 2006, 506; (e) H. Maeda, Y. Ishikawa, T. Ma suda, A. Osuka and H. Fu u a, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 11822; ( ) H. Maeda, A. Osuka, Y. Ishikawa, I. A i ome, Y. Hisaeda, T. Ma suda and H. Fu u a, O g. Le ., 2003, 5, 1293; (g) D.-H. Won, M. Toganoh, H. Uno and H. Fu u a, Dal on T ans., 2009, 6151; (h) K. Hi aoka and S. Mizuse, J. Chem. Phys., 1986, 86, 4102; (i) K. Hi aoka and S. Mizuse, J. Phys. Chem., 1987, 91, 5294; (j) H. Schneide , K. M. Vogelhube , F. Schinle and J. M. Webe , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 13022. 10 T. J. Mooib oek, C. A. Black, P. Gamez and J. Reedijk, C ys . G ow h Des., 2008, 8, 1082. This jou nal is © The Royal Socie y o Chemis y 2015 Chem. Sci.,2015,6,354–359 | 359 Edge A icle Chemical Science Open Access A icle. Published on 16 Oc obe 2014. Downloaded on 18/01/2016 06:16:06. This a icle is licensed unde a C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 3.0 Unpo ed Licence. View A icle Online