scieee Open visual document viewer

Spin and charge currents driven by the Higgs mode in high-field superconductors

Silaev, Mikhail A.,Ojajärvi, Risto,Heikkilä, Tero T.

Full text

This is a sel -a chi ed e sion o an o iginal a icle. This e sion may di e om he o iginal in pagina ion and ypog aphic de ails. Au ho (s): Ti le: Yea : Ve sion: Copy igh : Righ s: Righ s u l: Please ci e he o iginal e sion: CC BY 4.0 h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/ Spin and cha ge cu en s d i en by he Higgs mode in high- ield supe conduc o s © Au ho s, 2020 Published e sion Silae , Mikhail A.; Ojajä i, Ris o; Heikkilä, Te o T. Silae , M. A., Ojajä i, R., & Heikkilä, T. T. (2020). Spin and cha ge cu en s d i en by he Higgs mode in high- ield supe conduc o s. Physical Re iew Resea ch, 2(3), A icle 033416. h ps://doi.o g/10.1103/PhysRe Resea ch.2.033416 2020 PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH 2, 033416 (2020) Spin and cha ge cu en s d i en by he Higgs mode in high-field supe conduc o s Mikhail A. Silae ,1,2Ris o Ojajä i ,1and Te o T. Heikkilä 1 1Uni e si y o Jy askyla, Depa men o Physics and Nanoscience Cen e , P.O. Box 35 (YFL), FI-40014 Uni e si y o Jy äskylä, Finland 2Moscow Ins i u e o Physics and Technology, Dolgop udny, Moscow Region 141700, Russia (Recei ed 1 July 2019; e ised 23 Augus 2020; accep ed 25 Augus 2020; published 15 Sep embe 2020) The Higgs mode in supe conduc ing ma e ials desc ibes slowly decaying oscilla ions o he o de pa ame e ampli ude. We demons a e ha in supe conduc o s wi h a buil -in spin-spli ing field he Higgs mode is s ongly coupled o he spin deg ees o eedom, allowing o he gene a ion o ime-dependen spin cu en s. Con e ing such spin cu en s o elec ic signals by spin-fil e ing elemen s p o ides a ool o he second-ha monic gene a- ion and he elec ical de ec ion o he Higgs mode gene a ed by he ex e nal i adia ion. The nonadiaba ic spin o ques gene a ed by hese spin cu en s allow o he magne ic de ec ion o he Higgs mode by measu ing he p ecession o he magne ic momen in he adjacen e omagne . We discuss also he ecip ocal e ec , which is he gene a ion o he Higgs mode by he magne ic p ecession. Coupling he collec i e modes in supe conduc o s o ligh and magne ic dynamics p o ides an oppo uni y o he s udy o supe conduc ing op ospin onics. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRe Resea ch.2.033416 I. INTRODUCTION Oscilla ions o he o de pa ame e ampli ude in condensed-ma e sys ems a e o en called Higgs modes (HMs) [1–5], in analogy wi h he Higgs boson in pa icle physics [6]. These collec i e exci a ions a e gene ic o o de ed s a es such as an i e omagne s, cha ge densi y wa es [7], supe fluids [8–10], cold a omic gases [11,12] and supe conduc o s [2,13–27]. In gene al, one can call HMs all he possible collec i e modes o he o de pa ame e , o he han he Nambu-Golds one modes [4]. Higgs modes ha e been obse ed by Raman sca e ing in supe conduc o s wi h cha ge densi y wa e o de [14,15,17,28] and by he nuclea magne ic esonance in supe fluid 3He [8–10]. In usual supe conduc o s he HMs a e cha ge neu al and hus decoupled om cha ge cu en . In such sys ems he obse a ion o HMs has been acili a ed by he de elopmen o low- empe a u e e ahe z spec oscopy [18,19,24,29–32]. Wi h his echnique, HMs ha e been obse ed in NbTiN and NbN compounds [18,19]. Higgs modes ha e been obse ed indi ec ly as he AC linea conduc ance peak in cu en - ca ying films o NbN [24] and Al [33]. He e we sugges a di e en mechanism allowing elec ical de ec ion o HMs due o hei coupling wi h spin and cha ge deg ees o eedom in high-field supe conduc o / e omagne junc ions. Unusual anspo p ope ies o such sys ems ha e a ac ed in ense a en ion [34–37], s imula ing bo h expe i- men al [38–47] and heo e ical e o s [34,48–57]. The unde lying physical mechanism behind he sugges ed elec ical measu emen o he HM is oo ed in he s ong cou- pling be ween he supe conduc ing o de pa ame e dynamics Published by he Ame ican Physical Socie y unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 4.0 In e na ional license. Fu he dis ibu ion o his wo k mus main ain a ibu ion o he au ho (s) and he published a icle’s i le, jou nal ci a ion, and DOI. and elec on spins. The possibili y o ansmi spin signals by he o de pa ame e exci a ions has been elucida ed using he example o mobile opological de ec s, i.e., Ab ikoso o ices [55,56]. He e we demons a e ha ime-dependen spin cu en s can be gene a ed by he collec i e ampli ude modes in supe conduc o s. The s uc u e o his pape is as ollows. In Sec. II we in oduce he se up and model. Sec ion III shows he e ec o he HM on AC spin and cha ge cu en s. Thei use in access- ing he HM ei he in second-ha monic gene a ion o ia he measu emen o an a oided c ossing be ween e omagne ic esonance and HMs is discussed in Sec. IV. We conclude in Sec. Vwi h an ou look o he ange o phenomena a ec ed by he HM. II. SETUP AND MODEL The gene ic se up ha we s udy is shown in Fig. 1(a).I s basic elemen is a supe conduc ing film placed in con ac wi h a e omagne ic (FM) ma e ial. An e ec i e spin-spli ing field hen e ing as he Zeeman e m in he Hamil onian o he supe conduc o (SC) is induced by an ex e nal in-plane magne ic field. Al e na i ely, hcould be induced by he p ox- imi y o a e omagne ic insula o [58–62]. The sys em is exposed o an ex e nal i adia ion Eei which gene a es a ime-dependen pe u ba ion o he o de pa ame e ampli- ude δ( )=2e2i h ough he second-o de nonlinea i y 2∝E2 [63,64]. We model he SC/FM junc ion using he unneling Hamil- onian app oach [65,66], which has been used ex ensi ely o s udy bo h AC and DC unnel cu en s [65,67–69], HT= kkα A† kα(ˆ ˆ Bk)α+H.c.,(1) ˆ =Tˆτ3+U(m·ˆ σ).(2) He e Akα(Bkα) annihila es an elec on wi h momen um k and spin αin he SC ( e omagne ), he uni ec o m 2643-1564/2020/2(3)/033416(10) 033416-1 Published by he Ame ican Physical Socie y SILAEV, OJAJÄRVI, AND HEIKKILÄ PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH 2, 033416 (2020) (a) (b) FIG. 1. (a) Se up o he supe conduc o / e omagne s uc u e. The exchange field his induced by an ex e nal magne ic field B. The double- equency gap modula ion can be exci ed by he ex e - nal elec omagne ic i adia ion 2∝E2 and is enhanced due o he coupling o he HM. (b) Semiconduc o model o he cu en gene a ion by a slowly a ying pe u ba ion o he o de pa ame e ampli ude δ( ). Only he spin-down band is shown. The e o- magne has an equilib ium dis ibu ion n0(ε), while he dis ibu ion n(ε, ) o he supe conduc o is shi ed wi h espec o he equi- lib ium dis ibu ion (dashed line) by δ( ) away om he Fe mi le el. Due o he Zeeman shi h, he pe u ba ion in he numbe o exci a ions is asymme ic wi h espec o he Fe mi le el εF.This esul s in ne spin and cha ge cu en s flowing in o he a ached FM elec ode h ough he unnel ba ie (I). defines he spin quan iza ion axis o he ba ie , ˆτkand ˆσka e he Pauli ma ices in Nambu and spin spaces, e- spec i ely, and Uand Ta e he spin-independen and spin-dependen ma ix elemen s o he unneling Hamil onian, espec i ely [70]. The ma ix unneling cu en h ough he spin-pola ized ba ie s can be exp essed h ough momen um- a e aged G een’s unc ions (GFs) in he supe conduc ing and FM elec odes νSˆgS=ˆτ3kTˆ Ak(τ)ˆ A† k(τ)and νFˆgF= ˆτ3kTˆ Bk(τ)ˆ B† k(τ), espec i ely. He e τand τa e imag- ina y imes, Tis he ime-o de ing ope a o , and νSand νF a e he no mal me al densi ies o s a es on he wo sides o he junc ion. Fo simplici y, we assume momen um-independen unneling coe ficien s [70,71]. The ime-dependen unneling cu en o he gene al nonequilib ium s a e in he elec odes de i ed in Appendix A eads ˆ I(τ)=iνSνF 2[ˆgS◦(ˆ ˆgFˆ )−(ˆ ˆgFˆ )◦ˆgS]τ=τ,(3) whe e ◦deno es ime con olu ion. The o e all unnel cu en ampli ude is de e mined by κ=νSνF(T2+U2) and he e - ec i e spin-fil e ing pola iza ion is P=2TUm/(T2+U2). T acing he gene al exp ession wi h app op ia e Pauli ma- ices, we ex ac he cha ge cu en I=eT (ˆτ3ˆ I) and he spin cu en Is=T ( ˆ σˆ I). The eal- ime esponse is ob ained by he me hod o analy ic con inua ion, desc ibed in Appendix B. We assume ha he elec odes a e in he di usi e egime and can be desc ibed by he ime-dependen Usadel equa ion o quasiclassical GFs. In he imagina y- ime ep esen a ion i has he o m (we se ¯h=1 he e and below) −i{ˆτ3∂τ,ˆg}τ=Dˆ ∂ (ˆg◦ˆ ∂ ˆg)−i[ˆτ3ˆ H,ˆg]τ,(4) whe e Dis he di usion cons an , ˆ H=ˆτ1+h·ˆ σ, and h is he exchange field. The quasiclassical GFs also sa is y he no maliza ion condi ion (ˆg◦ˆg)τ,τ=δ(τ−τ). The ime de i a i e, con olu ion p oduc , and di e en ial supe ope a o in Eq. (4)a e {ˆτ3∂τ,ˆg}τ=ˆτ3∂τ1ˆg(τ1,τ 2)+∂τ2ˆg(τ1,τ 2)ˆτ3,(5) ( ◦g)(τ1,τ 2)=β 0 dτ3 (τ1,τ 3)g(τ3,τ 2),(6) ˆ ∂ =∂ −ie c[ˆτ3A(τ),·],(7) espec i ely, whe e eis he elemen a y cha ge and cis he speed o ligh . III. RESULTS A. Quali a i e desc ip ion In Fig. 1(b) we adap he usual semiconduc o pic u e o he unnel cu en in supe conduc o junc ions [72] oshow how he ime-dependen gap unc ion c ea es a nonequilib- ium s a e n(ε, ) in he supe conduc ing elec ode. Due o he Zeeman shi h, his s a e is nonsymme ic wi h espec o he Fe mi le el εFand he e o e p oduces spin cu en h ough he unnel ba ie be ween he SC and he adjacen no mal me al. This quali a i e pic u e is based on he ime-dependen ene gy spec um Eσ=√ξ2 p+( )2+σh, wi h σ=±1 o spin-up/down Bogoliubo quasipa icles, espec i ely, whe e ξpis he kine ic ene gy coun ed om he Fe mi le el εF. Fo a slow ime-dependen o de pa ame e he spin- esol ed pe u ba ion o he quasipa icle dis ibu ion unc ion can be w i en as ( ˙ /)d dNσ, whe e he numbe o he mally exci ed s a es in equilib ium is Nσ=dξpn(Eσ(ξp,)), wi h n(E)= anh(E/2T). The inelas ic sca e ing elaxa ion a e  is gi en by he Dynes pa ame e [73]. The spin-dependen pe u ba ion o he dis ibu ion unc- ion esul s in he spin cu en Is( )=κ  ˙ d d(N+−N−),(8) whe e κis he e ec i e ba ie anspa ency. As shown below, Eq. (8) is ob ained in he low- equency limi  om he gene al esul (21). The ad an age o Eq. (8) is ha i allows o he ca oon in e p e a ion in e ms o he semicon- duc o model in Fig. 1(b). Howe e , o he mos in e es ing case when he equency o he ( )∝e2i oscilla ion is compa able o he gap ∼and hence is coupled o he HM [13,16,74,75], he pic u e becomes mo e complica ed and equi es calcula ions using Eqs. (3) and (4) as desc ibed in Sec. IIIC. B. Second-ha monic gene a ion due o he b oken pa icle-hole symme y Spin cu en gene a ed by he HM can be con e ed o cha ge cu en using spin-fil e ing FM elec odes. In he se up shown in Fig. 1(a) he spin cu en is e ec i ely con e ed o he cha ge cu en while passing h ough he spin-fil e ing ba ie cha ac e ized by he pola iza ion ec- o P. The ime-dependen cha ge cu en induced in his way by he o de pa ame e ampli ude oscilla ion is he e o e quali a i ely gi en by I( )∝P·Is( ), which esul s in he 033416-2 SPIN AND CHARGE CURRENTS DRIVEN BY THE HIGGS … PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH 2, 033416 (2020) es ima e I( )∝(P·h)∂ . Modula ion o he o de pa am- e e ampli ude can be induced, o example, by an ex e nal i adia ion [63,64]( )∝A2( ), whe e A( ) is he ec o po en ial o he ex e nal field. Hence his cha ge cu en I( )∝ (P·h)∂ A2, being quad a ic in he ec o po en ial, demon- s a es he second-ha monic gene a ion (SHG) con olled by he supe conduc ing o de pa ame e . Despi e he la ge amoun o a en ion o he nonlinea e - ec s in supe conduc o s, SHG has no been ob ained be o e.1 Hence only hi d-ha monic gene a ion has been s udied in supe conduc o s [19,32,63,64,76]. We show below ha such a kind o SHG is no p ohibi ed by he gene ic symme ies o he p oblem, bu is elimina ed by he app oxima e symme y o Fe mi su ace sys ems, made exac in he widely used quasiclassical app oxima ion [77].2This addi ional symme y o he GF sa is ying he Usadel equa ion (4)is ˆg(A,h,)=−ˆτ1ˆg(−A,h, ∗)ˆτ1.(9) The o -diagonal Nambu space Pauli ma ix ˆτ1in e changes he pa icle and hole blocks in he Hamil onian [77], so he physical in e p e a ion o Eq. (9) is a pa icle-hole symme y. Fo he nons a iona y cha ge cu en gene a ed by he ime- dependen ec o po en ial his symme y yields I(A,)= −I(−A, ∗). Fu he , in he absence o supe cu en o ex- e nal o bi al fields we can assume he o de pa ame e o be eal =∗. Then e en he b oken in e sion symme y nea su aces does no help o p oduce SHG in supe conduc ing sys ems in con as o he no mal me al coun e pa o his e ec . Because o his symme y, he di ec coupling be ween he HM and he cha ge cu en is p ohibi ed. Howe e , as we see below, i allows o he spin cu en s d i en by he HM and ex e nal field e en wi h a non e omagne ic ba ie , ha is, a P=0. The pa icle-hole symme y is b oken in supe conduc ing/ FM sys ems leading o la ge he moelec ic [34,78,79] and anomalous Josephson e ec s [77]. Fo eal  he ans o ma- ion (9) applied o he gene al unnel cu en yields I(A,h,P)=−I(−A,h,−P).(10) This ela ion allows o SHG. Because he sign o Pis in e ed he e is no longe a symme y wi h espec o he me e flipping o he ec o po en ial, I(A)=−I(−A). Hence, o he AC ex e nal field Aei ,Eq.(10) allows o he double- equency cha ge cu en componen I2ei wi h he ampli ude I2∝ ||2A2 (P·h) as well as he DC unnel cu en [51]IDC ∝ ||2AA−(P·h). The esonan SHG o spin and cha ge cu en s h ough he exci a ion o HM by elec omagne ic i adia ion is discussed below in Sec. III C. C. Calcula ion o spin and cha ge cu en s We assume ha he supe conduc ing elec ode is d i en ou o equilib ium by he elec omagne ic field desc ibed by he ime-dependen ec o po en ial Aei . I p oduces 1He e we exclude he i ial SHG which esul s om he hi d-o de nonlinea i y when bo h he oscilla ing and cons an fields a e applied. 2The Fe mi su ace symme y p esen in he quasiclassical app ox- ima ion is b oken he e by he spin pola iza ion o unneling. he second-ha monic pe u ba ion o he GF and unnel cu en (3) ˆgS(τ,τ)=T ω ˆgS(ω+,ω −)eiω+τ−iω−τ,(11) ˆ I2=iνSνF 2T ω [ˆ ˆgSˆ ˆg0(ω−)−ˆg0(ω+)ˆ ˆgSˆ ],(12) whe e ω±=ω±a e he e mionic Ma suba a equencies shi ed by he equency o he ex e nal field. We define ˆgS=ˆgS(ω+,ω −) and assume ha he e omagne is in he equilib ium s a e de e mined by he GF ˆgF(ω)=ˆg0(ω)≡ sgn(ω)ˆτ3. The e a e wo quali a i ely di e en e ms in he nonequi- lib ium GF ˆgS=ˆgAA +ˆg. The fi s one is gene a ed by he di ec coupling o he ex e nal elec omagne ic field. The second e m is gene a ed by he o de pa ame e oscilla ions, which can be induced by ei he he elec omagne ic field o o he sou ces, o example, he spin cu en . Di ec coupling o he elec omagne ic field is desc ibed by he GF pe u ba ions o second o de by he ec o po en ial. F om he Usadel equa ion (4) we find ha he pe u ba ion ˆgAA(ω+,ω −) sa isfies he equa ion s+ˆg0(ω+)ˆgAA −s−ˆgAA ˆg0(ω−) =DeA c2 [ˆg0(ω+)ˆτ3ˆg0(ω)ˆτ3−ˆτ3ˆg0(ω)ˆτ3ˆg0(ω−)]. (13) Expanding he no maliza ion condi ion in pe u ba ion se ies p o ides an an icommu a ion ule ˆgAA ˆg0(ω−)=−ˆg0(ω+)ˆgAA, which can be used o sol e Eq. (13), ˆgAA =DeA c2ˆτ3ˆg0(ω)ˆτ3−ˆg0(ω+)ˆτ3ˆg0(ω)ˆτ3ˆg0(ω−) s++s− , (14) whe e s±=ˆs(ω±) and ˆs(ω)=2−(iω−h·ˆ σ)2. Abo e, we abuse he no a ion sligh ly by w i ing he ma ix in e se [s++s−]−1as a scala di ision. No ambigui y is in oduced as ˆs(ω)’s commu e wi h he e ms in he nume a o . Fu he - mo e, in he final exp ession o he spin cu en (21)weshi he ene gy in eg a ion and emo e he exchange field om he ˆs(ω)’s, making hei spin s uc u e i ial. Co ec ions o he GF induced by he ime-dependen o - de pa ame e ampli ude 2e2i can be ound in he o m ˆg(τ,τ)=Tωei(ω+τ−ω−τ)ˆg(ω+,ω −). F om he Usadel equa ion (4) ha ˆg(ω+,ω −) sa isfies he equa ion s+ˆg0(ω+)ˆg−s−ˆgˆg0(ω−)=2[ˆτ2ˆg0(ω−)−ˆg0(ω+)ˆτ2]. (15) Again using he no maliza ion condi ion, he solu ion o his equa ion is gi en by ˆg=2 ˆg0(ω+)ˆτ2ˆg0(ω−)−ˆτ2 s++s− .(16) The ampli ude 2can be ound om he sel -consis ency equa ion 2=−λT ω T [ˆτ2(ˆgAA +ˆg)],(17) 033416-3 SILAEV, OJAJÄRVI, AND HEIKKILÄ PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH 2, 033416 (2020) whe e we in oduce he dimensionless pai ing cons an λand he Pauli ma ix ˆτ2co esponds o he supe conduc ing ampli- ude e ex. The pa which is di ec ly p oduced by he i adia ion p o- ides a sou ce o he Higgs mode F(2)=−λT ω T [ˆτ2ˆgAA].(18) The o he pa de e mines he sel -induced co ec ions o he o de pa ame e ˜ 2=(2)2desc ibed by he pola iza- ion ope a o (2)=1+πλT ω T 2+2 s−s+(s−+s+),(19) whe e he ace is aken o e he spin deg ee o eedom. Col- lec ing all he con ibu ions o he sel -consis ency equa ion (17), we ge 2=F/[1 −(2)].(20) This exp ession desc ibes he HM exci a ion in he supe - conduc o d i en ou o equilib ium by a con inuous-wa e i adia ion as shown schema ically in Fig. 1(a). The esonance condi ion co esponding o he HM is sa isfied o =∗ when 1 −(2∗)=0+o(√). Hence he maximal ampli- ude o he o de pa ame e oscilla ions is de e mined by he b oadening pa ame e , leading o a sha p peak in 2(, T) o ≈∗(T). In he absence o spin elaxa ion p ocesses ∗=(T). Using he ound GF co ec ions (14) and (16), we calcu- la e he spin and cha ge componen s o he unneling cu en (12). The HM con ibu ion is de e mined by he e m ˆg. Using he p ocedu e o analy ical con inua ion desc ibed in Appendix B, we ob ain he ampli ude o eal- equency spin cu en Is()e2i d i en by he HM, Is()=iκh2 σ σ hdε 4π ε[n(ε+)−n(ε−)] sR +sA −(sR ++sA −),(21) whe e n(ε) is he equilib ium dis ibu ion unc ion. He e he spin spli ing has been shi ed om he spec al unc ions o he dis ibu ion unc ions, so ε±=ε±+σhand sR,A= −i(ε±i)2−2. In he low- equency limi we ob ain Eq. (8) when he spin cu en is d i en by he adiaba ic ime dependence o in acco dance wi h he quali a i e pic- u e shown schema ically in Fig. 1(b). In he p esence o he HM, which is he slowly decaying os- cilla ions o he o de pa ame e ( )[13,16], he spin cu en is gi en by he sum o he co esponding Fou ie componen s wi h he ampli udes gi en by (21). As a esul o Eq. (21)we ge slowly decaying oscilla ions o he spin cu en Is( ) which can be measu ed using elec ical p obes a e he supe con- duc o is ini ially d i en in o a nonequilib ium s a e by a field pulse. Taking in o accoun he ela ion (20), we ob ain he SHG spin and cha ge cu en s induced by he ex e nal i adia ion in acco dance wi h he quali a i e discussion in Sec. III B.The esonan beha io o he double- equency spin cu en Is() esul ing om he HM mode exci a ion is shown in Fig. 2. FIG. 2. Ampli ude o double- equency spin cu en Is()e2i d i en h ough he SC/ e omagne unnel junc ion by an ex e - nal field Aei . The cu en is no malized o I0=κD(eA/c)2; Tcis he c i ical empe a u e. The sha p maximum a equencies (2)≈1 co esponds o he esonan exci a ion o he Higgs mode. (a) Is(, T)and(b)Is(T) a di e en equencies /0= 0.4,0.8,0.95,1.2. The exchange field is h=0.20and he Dynes pa ame e =0.0050. The peaks a e a empe a u es de e mined by (2)≈1. IV. DISCUSSION A. Elec ical de ec ion o he Higgs mode The sugges ed e ec o SHG cha ge cu en coupled o he HM can be measu ed, o example, in hin films o Al supe - conduc o placed in a unnel con ac wi h FM i on elec odes simila o he se ups used in he measu emen o he non- local spin signals [38–40,43–47]. Wi h Tc=1.6 K and gap 0=2×10−4eV, he spin-spli ing field h=0.20can be ob ained wi h an ex e nal in-plane magne ic field B≈0.5T, and he pola iza ion o his ype o FM con ac [44]isP=0.2. Wi h la ge enough a ea, he no mal-s a e unnel conduc ance can be eκ=10−2S. The elec omagne ic pa o he se up can be simila o he expe imen s on s imula ed supe conduc i i y [80,81]. The elec omagne ic powe is cha ac e ized by he pa- ame e α=D(eA/c)2, which can be made as la ge as α= 0.1Tcwi hou des oying he supe conduc i i y [82]. Fo Al i yields α≈10−5eV. Wi h such pa ame e s he cha ge cu en ampli ude co esponding o Fig. 2is ePI0=20 nA, which is wo o de s o magni ude la ge han he nonlocal he moelec- ic cu en measu ed ecen ly in a simila se up [47]. The maximal HM esonance equency in Al is 2=100 GHz, which is wi hin he capabili y o mode n spec um analyse s. A 10-nA cu en ac oss 50 co esponds o he signal ampli- ude −113 dBm, which means ha he signal- o-noise le el exceeding uni y can be ob ained wi hin a 1-s measu emen ime wi h s a e-o - he-a high- equency mic owa e spec um analyse s wi h a noise floo abou −120 dBm/Hz. B. Spin o ques gene a ed be he Higgs mode I he exchange field hin he SC is noncollinea wi h he magne iza ion min he e omagne , he HM gene a es a spin o que ac ing on m. The gene ic sys em which can ealize his configu a ion is shown in Fig. 3(a). He e he exchange field hm0is c ea ed by he e omagne ic insula o laye wi h a fixed magne ic momen m0[34]. The spin- ans e o que (STT) gene a ed by he HM is shown schema ically in Fig. 3(a). The pola iza ion o he 033416-4 SPIN AND CHARGE CURRENTS DRIVEN BY THE HIGGS … PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH 2, 033416 (2020) FIG. 3. Se ups o s udying ans e se spin cu en s coupled o he HM in he supe conduc o (S). The exchange field in S is gene - a ed by he adjacen e omagne ic insula o (FI) wi h magne iza ion m0. (a) The spin o que τis gene a ed in an adjacen e omagne (F) wi h noncollinea magne iza ion m∦m0. (b) Magne iza ion p e- cession m( ) induces he spin cu en Isand he spin ba e y e ec leading o a pe u ba ion o he o de pa ame e ampli ude δ. nonequilib ium spin cu en Isis de e mined by he di ec- ion o he exchange field h. Assuming ha he ans e se componen o he spin cu en is abso bed in he e omag- ne [83–87], we ob ain he STT τ=Ish⊥/h, whe e h⊥= h−m(m·h) is he pe pendicula componen o he exchange field. The ecip ocal e ec shown in Fig. 3(b) is he pe u ba ion o he gap δ by he magne ic p ecession. The pumped spin cu en [83]Is∝m×˙ mhas a longi udinal componen Ish which gene a es a ime-dependen spin accumula ion μsin he SC. In combina ion wi h he spin-spli ing field h, his esul s in [51,88] δ =λ 1−μs∂(N+−N−),(22) whe e 1 −∝λis he low- equency asymp o ic o he pola iza ion ope a o . This exp ession demons a es he pos- sibili y o couple he o de pa ame e ampli ude wi h he magne iza ion dynamics. Thus he highe - equency magne- iza ion p ecession wi h ∼gene a es he HM in he supe conduc o wi h a spin-spli ing field. This e ec can be iewed as he HM-media ed ans e o he spin angula momen um om he e omagne ic insula o o he me allic e omagne shown in Fig. 3(a). Oscilla ing STT gene a ed by he o de pa ame e ampli ude mode can exci e he e omagne ic esonance (FMR) in he a ached e omagne . Hyb idiza ion o he FMR and Higgs esonance should show up as he a oided c ossing o he peaks in he second-ha monic esponse o he sys ems. Such an ex- pe imen will di ec ly demons a e he dynamical coupling o he magne ic and supe conduc ing o de s. Modifica ion o he FMR linewid h by supe conduc ing co ela ions in e omagne /SC s uc u es has been obse ed [89–91]. In pe malloy films he FMR has been measu ed in fields up o 0.3 T co esponding o a equency o 20 GHz. Fo such a equency he Higgs esonance in Al is expec ed o occu a T≈0.92Tc. Thus a ying he field, one can measu e he empe a u e-con olled hyb idiza ion o he HM and FMR mode in Al/pe malloy s uc u es wi hin he cu en ly acces- sible ange o pa ame e s. V. CONCLUSION We ha e demons a ed ha spin and cha ge cu en s can be e ec i ely gene a ed by he collec i e ampli ude modes o he supe conduc ing o de pa ame e . Owing o he ac ha he HM can be gene a ed by ex e nal i adia ion [27,92], ou esul pa es he way o a concep ually di e en di ec ion o supe conduc ing op ospin onics: he s udy o spin cu en s and spin o ques gene a ed by ligh in e ac ing wi h supe con- duc ing ma e ials. We ha e sugges ed a de ec ion scheme o he HM based on measu ing esonan elec ic signals, ei he he cha ge cu en o ol age gene a ed ac oss he spin-pola ized unnel junc ion by he ex e nal field. Because hese signals appea a he doubled equency o he ex e nal field, ou se up in oduces a sys em ea u ing second-ha monic gene a ion con olled by supe conduc i i y. The sugges ed SHG can be s udied using op ical o mic owa e de ec o s [93] and he unneling cu en I2can be de ec ed using elec ical p obes. This ea u e o he SHG as compa ed o he p e iously known nonlinea esponse echniques allows o an elec ical de ec ion o he HM in supe conduc o s. Finally, a quali a i ely simila e ec should occu p o ided he e omagne is eplaced by ano he spin-fil e ing elemen such as a semiconduc o nanowi e in p oposed Majo ana- based qubi s [94–97]. The cha ge noise which is impo an in such de ices [97] can cause he o de pa ame e oscilla ions coupled o he spli ing o Majo ana ze o modes. This cou- pling opens possibili ies o many in e es ing e ec s o s udy. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This wo k was suppo ed by he Academy o Finland (P ojec s No. 297439 and No. 317118), Jenny and An i Wihu i Founda ion, Russian Science Founda ion (G an No. 19-19-00594), and he Eu opean Union’s Ho izon 2020 e- sea ch and inno a ion p og am unde G an Ag eemen No. 800923 (SUPERTED). APPENDIX A: TUNNEL CURRENT We model he spin-dependen unneling h ough he SC/ e omagne in e ace by he unneling Hamil onian (1). We calcula e he unneling cu en as a unc ion o he ime on he con ou unning along he imagina y axis om 0 o β=1/T. The ma ix unneling cu en in e ms o he imagina y ime unc ions eads ˆ I(τ)=i 2 k [∂τˆ GS(τ,τ,k,k)+∂τˆ GS(τ,τ,k,k)]τ=τ. (A1) To find he pe u ba ion we conside he con ou -o de ed GF ˆ GS(τ1,τ 2,k,k)=Tˆ Sˆ Ak(τ1)ˆ A† k(τ2),(A2) whe e Tis he con ou -o de ing ope a o and ˆ S≈1−β 0 dτ3HT(τ3).(A3) 033416-5 SILAEV, OJAJÄRVI, AND HEIKKILÄ PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH 2, 033416 (2020) In he in e ac ion ep esen a ion wi h espec o he unneling Hamil onian he equa ion o mo ion is ∂τˆ Ak=[ˆ Ak,HT]= k (ˆ kkˆ Bk).(A4) Using he equa ion o mo ion we ge −∂τ1ˆ GS(τ1,τ 2,k,k)=− qTˆ S[ˆ kq ˆ Bq(τ1)] ˆ A† k(τ2) ≈ qTβ 0 dτ3HT(τ3)ˆ kq ˆ Bq(τ1)ˆ A† k(τ2) = k1,k 1,qTβ 0 dτ3ˆ B† k 1(τ3)ˆ † k1k 1 ˆ Ak1(τ3)ˆ kq ˆ Bq(τ1)ˆ A† k(τ2) = k1,k 1,qβ 0 dτ3ˆ kqTˆ Bq(τ1)ˆ B† k 1(τ3)ˆ k 1k1Tˆ Ak1(τ3)ˆ A† k(τ2) = k1,k 1,qβ 0 dτ3ˆ kq ˆ GF(τ1,τ 3,q,k 1)ˆ k 1k1ˆ GS(τ3,τ 2,k1,k)(A5) and −∂τ2ˆ GS(τ1,τ 2,k,k)=− qTˆ Sˆ Ak(τ)[ˆ kq ˆ Bq( )]† ≈ qTβ 0 dτ3HT(τ3)ˆ Ak(τ1)[ˆ kq ˆ Bq(τ2)]† = k1,k 1,qTβ 0 dτ3ˆ k1k 1ˆ Bk 1(τ3)ˆ A† k1(τ3)ˆ Ak(τ1)ˆ B† q(τ2)ˆ † qk =− k1,k 1,qβ 0 dτ3Tˆ Ak(τ1)ˆ A† k1(τ3)ˆ k1k 1Tˆ Bk 1(τ3)ˆ B† q(τ2)ˆ qk =− k1,k 1,qβ 0 dτ3ˆ GS(τ1,τ 3,k,k1)ˆ k1k 1ˆ GF(τ3,τ 2,k 1,q)ˆ qk.(A6) Hence he ma ix cu en is gi en by ˆ I(τ)=i 2 k,k1,k 1,qβ 0 dτˆ GS(τ,τ,k,k1)ˆ k1k 1ˆ GF(τ,τ,k 1,q)ˆ qk −ˆ kq ˆ GF(τ,τ,q,k1)ˆ k1k 1ˆ GS(τ,τ,k 1,k).(A7) We assume ha GFs a e spa ially homogeneous, so ˆ GF(τ,τ,q,k1)=δq,k1ˆ GF(τ,τ,q) and he ma ix elemen is momen um independen ˆ kk=ˆ . Then we can in oduce he quasiclassical unc ions qˆ GF,S(τ,τ,q)=νF,Sˆτ3ˆgF,S(τ,τ) o w i e he cu en as ˆ I(τ)=iνSνF 2[ˆgS◦(ˆτ3ˆ ˆgFˆ ˆτ3)−(ˆτ3ˆ ˆgFˆ ˆτ3)◦ˆgS]τ=τ.(A8) Taking in o accoun ha he no mal me al GF ˆgFcommu es wi h ˆτ3,Eq.(A8) can be educed o Eq. (3). APPENDIX B: ANALYTICAL CONTINUATION In o de o find he eal- equency esponse we need o implemen he analy ic con inua ion o Eq. (12). These second-o de esponses a e ob ained by he summa ion o exp essions which depend on he mul iple shi ed e mionic equencies such as g(ω1,ω 2,ω 3). The analy ic con inua ion o he sum by Ma suba a equencies is de e mined acco ding o he gene al ule [98] T ω g(ω1,ω 2,ω 3)→ 3  l=1dε 4πin0(εl)g...,−iεR l,... −g...,−iεA l,...,(B1) 033416-6 SPIN AND CHARGE CURRENTS DRIVEN BY THE HIGGS … PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH 2, 033416 (2020) whe e n0(ε)= anh(ε/2T) is he equilib ium dis ibu ion unc ion. On he igh -hand side o (B1) we subs i u e in each e m ωk<l=−iεR kand ωk>l=−iεA k o k=1,2,3, and we define εk=ε+(2 −k),εR=ε+i, and εA=ε−i. He e he e m wi h >0 is added o shi he in eg a ion con ou in o he co esponding hal plane. A he same ime,  can be used as he Dynes pa ame e [73] o desc ibe he e ec o di e en depai ing mechanisms on spec al unc ions in he supe conduc o . We implemen he analy ical con inua ion in such a way ha s(−iεR,A)=−i(εR,A)2−2, assuming ha he b anch cu s un om (, ∞) and (−∞,−). In he p esence o he spin-spli ing field he ene gy in Eq. (B1) should be shi ed o ε+σh, whe e σ=±1 is he spin subband index. The equilib ium GF in he imagina y equency domain is gi en by ˆg0(ω)=(ˆτ3ω−ˆτ2)/s(ω). The eal- equency con- inua ion eads ˆgR,A 0(ε)=(ˆτ3εR,A−iˆτ2)/(εR,A)2−2. Example. To demons a e he analy ical con inua ion in p ac ice we calcula e he spin cu en d i en by he Higgs mode. Fo eal equencies he spin cu en ob ained om (A8) can be w i en in e ms o he Keldysh componen Is=κ 8π σ σdεT [ˆgF(ε+)ˆgS(ε)−ˆgS(ε)ˆgF(ε−)]K =κ 8π σ σdε[n(ε+)−n(ε−)]T ˆτ3ˆga S,(B2) whe e ε±=ε+σh±ω. In de i ing (B2) we used he ac ha ˆgR(A) F=±1 do no depend on ene gy. The anomalous pa o he nonequilib ium GF in he supe conduc o is ˆga S=2 ˆgR(ε+)ˆτ2ˆgA(ε−)−ˆτ2 sR ++sA − ,(B3) whe e we define sR,A ±=sR,A(ε±). Subs i u ing he solu ion (B3) and using T [τ3gR +τ2gA −]=2i0ε/sR +sA −, we ge Is=iκ02 σ σdε 4π (ε+σh)[n(ε+)−n(ε−)] sR +sA −(sR ++sA −) =iκ02 (ω+i)dε 16π σ σ[n(ε+)−n(ε−)]1 sR +−1 sA −, (B4) whe eweuse(sR +)2−(sA −)2=4(ε+σh)(ω+i). In he low- equency limi we can subs i u e n(ε+)−n(ε−)= 2ω∂εnand sR +=−sA +=−i√ε2−2. Then he spin cu en can be w i en in he simple o m Is=κ  σ σd d dξpn(Eσ(ξp,( ))) =κ  ˙ d d(N+−N−),(B5) whe e Eσ(ξp,( ))=√ξ2 p+2( )+σhis he spec um o Bogoliubo quasipa icles shi ed by he spin-spli ing field h. [1] C. M. Va ma, Higgs boson in supe conduc o s, J. Low Temp. Phys. 126, 901 (2002). [2] D. Podolsky, A. Aue bach, and D. P. A o as, Visibili y o he ampli ude (Higgs) mode in condensed ma e , Phys. Re . B 84, 174522 (2011). [3] A. Pashkin and A. Lei ens o e , Pa icle physics in a supe con- duc o , Science 345, 1121 (2014). [4] G. E. Volo ik and M. A. Zubko , Higgs bosons in pa icle physics and in condensed ma e , J. Low Temp. Phys. 175, 486 (2014). [5] D. Pekke and C. M. Va ma, Ampli ude/Higgs modes in con- densed ma e physics, Annu. Re . Condens. Ma e Phys. 6, 269 (2015). [6] P. W. Higgs, B oken Symme ies and he Masses o Gauge Bosons, Phys.Re .Le .13, 508 (1964). [7] G. G üne , The dynamics o cha ge-densi y wa es, Re . Mod. Phys. 60, 1129 (1988). [8] D. N. Paulson, R. T. Johnson, and J. C. Whea ley, P opaga ion o Collisionless Sound in No mal and Ex ao dina y Phases o Liquid 3He below 3 mK, Phys. Re . Le . 30, 829 (1973). [9] D. T. Lawson, W. J. Gully, S. Golds ein, R. C. Richa dson, and D. M. Lee, A enua ion o Ze o Sound and he Low- Tempe a u e T ansi ions in Liquid 3He, Phys. Re . Le . 30, 541 (1973). [10] V. V. Za jalo , S. Au i, V. B. El so , P. J. Heikkinen, and G. E. Volo ik, Ligh Higgs channel o he esonan decay o magnon condensa e in supe fluid 3He-B, Na . Commun. 7, 10294 (2016). [11] U. Bissbo , S. Gö ze, Y. Li, J. Heinze, J. S. K ause , M. Weinbe g, C. Becke , K. Sengs ock, and W. Ho s e e , De ec - ing he Ampli ude Mode o S ongly In e ac ing La ice Bosons by B agg Sca e ing, Phys. Re . Le . 106, 205303 (2011). [12] M. End es, T. Fukuha a, D. Pekke , M. Cheneau, P. Schauß, C. G oss, E. Demle , S. Kuh , and I. Bloch, The ‘Higgs’ ampli ude mode a he wo-dimensional supe fluid/Mo insula o ansi- ion, Na u e (London) 487, 454 (2012). [13] A. F. Volko and S. M. Kogan, Collisionless elaxa ion o he ene gy gap in supe conduc o s, Zh. Eksp. Teo . Fiz. 65, 2038 (1973) [So . Phys.—JETP 38, 1018 (1974)]. [14] R. Soo yakuma and M. V. Klein, Raman Sca e ing by Supe conduc ing-Gap Exci a ions and hei Coupling o Cha ge-Densi y Wa es, Phys.Re .Le .45, 660 (1980). [15] P. B. Li lewood and C. M. Va ma, Ampli ude collec i e modes in supe conduc o s and hei coupling o cha ge-densi y wa es, Phys. Re . B 26, 4883 (1982). [16] R. A. Ba anko , L. S. Le i o , and B. Z. Spi ak, Collec i e Rabi Oscilla ions and Soli ons in a Time-Dependen BCS Pai ing P oblem, Phys.Re .Le .93, 160401 (2004). [17] R. G asse , T. Cea, Y. Gallais, M. Cazayous, A. Sacu o, L. Ca io, L. Ben a o, and M.-A. Méasson, Higgs-mode adiance and cha ge-densi y-wa e o de in 2H-NbSe2,Phys.Re .B97, 094502 (2018). [18] R. Ma sunaga, Y. I. Hamada, K. Makise, Y. Uzawa, H. Te ai, Z. Wang, and R. Shimano, Higgs Ampli ude Mode in he BCS Supe conduc o s Nb1−xTixN Induced by Te ahe z Pulse Exci- a ion, Phys.Re .Le .111, 057002 (2013). 033416-7 SILAEV, OJAJÄRVI, AND HEIKKILÄ PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH 2, 033416 (2020) [19] R. Ma sunaga, N. Tsuji, H. Fuji a, A. Sugioka, K. Makise, Y. Uzawa, H. Te ai, Z. Wang, H. Aoki, and R. Shimano, Ligh - induced collec i e pseudospin p ecession esona ing wi h Higgs mode in a supe conduc o , Science 345, 1145 (2014). [20] D. She man, U. S. P ach , B. Go shuno , S. Po an, J. Jesudasan, M. Chand, P. Raychaudhu i, M. Swanson, N. T i edi, A. Aue bach, M. Sche fle , A. F ydman, and M. D essel, The Higgs mode in diso de ed supe conduc o s close o a quan um phase ansi ion, Na . Phys. 11, 188 (2015). [21] N. Tsuji and H. Aoki, Theo y o Ande son pseudospin eso- nance wi h Higgs mode in supe conduc o s, Phys.Re .B92, 064508 (2015). [22]R.Ma sunaga,N.Tsuji,K.Makise,H.Te ai,H.Aoki,andR. Shimano, Pola iza ion- esol ed e ahe z hi d-ha monic gene - a ion in a single-c ys al supe conduc o NbN: Dominance o he Higgs mode beyond he BCS app oxima ion, Phys. Re . B 96, 020505(R) (2017). [23] K. Ka sumi, N. Tsuji, Y. I. Hamada, R. Ma sunaga, J. Schneeloch, R. D. Zhong, G. D. Gu, H. Aoki, Y. Gallais, and R. Shimano, Higgs Mode in he d-Wa e Supe conduc o Bi2S 2CaCu2O8+xD i en by an In ense Te ahe z Pulse, Phys. Re . Le . 120, 117001 (2018). [24] S. Nakamu a, Y. Iida, Y. Mu o ani, R. Ma sunaga, H. Te ai, and R. Shimano, In a ed Ac i a ion o he Higgs Mode by Supe cu en Injec ion in Supe conduc ing NbN, Phys. Re . Le . 122, 257001 (2019). [25] H. Uema su, T. Mizushima, A. Tsu u a, S. Fujimo o, and J. A. Sauls, Chi al Higgs Mode in Nema ic Supe conduc o s, Phys. Re . Le . 123, 237001 (2019). [26] A. Moo , A. F. Volko , and K. B. E e o , Ampli ude Higgs Mode and Admi ance in Supe conduc o s wi h a Mo ing Con- densa e, Phys. Re . Le . 118, 047001 (2017). [27] M. Silae , Nonlinea elec omagne ic esponse and Higgs-mode exci a ion in BCS supe conduc o s wi h impu i ies, Phys. Re . B99, 224511 (2019). [28] R. G asse , Y. Gallais, A. Sacu o, M. Cazayous, S. Mañas- Vale o, E. Co onado, and M.-A. Méasson, P essu e-Induced Collapse o he Cha ge Densi y Wa e and Higgs Mode Visi- bili y in 2H-TaS2,Phys. Re . Le . 122, 127001 (2019). [29] M. Beck, M. Klamme , S. Lang, P. Leide e , V. V. Kabano , G. N. Gol’ sman, and J. Demsa , Ene gy-Gap Dynamics o Supe conduc ing NbN Thin Films S udied by Time- Resol ed Te ahe z Spec oscopy, Phys. Re . Le . 107, 177007 (2011). [30] M. Beck, I. Rousseau, M. Klamme , P. Leide e , M. Mi endo , S. Winne l, M. Helm, G. N. Gol’ sman, and J. Demsa , T ansien Inc ease o he Ene gy Gap o Supe con- duc ing NbN Thin Films Exci ed by Resonan Na ow-Band Te ahe z Pulses, Phys.Re .Le .110, 267003 (2013). [31] R. Ma sunaga and R. Shimano, Nonequilib ium BCS S a e Dynamics Induced by In ense Te ahe z Pulses in a Supe con- duc ing NbN Film, Phys. Re . Le . 109, 187002 (2012). [32] F. Gio gianni, T. Cea, C. Vica io, C. P. Hau i, W. K. Wi hanage, X. Xi, and L. Ben a o, Legge mode con olled by ligh pulses, Na . Phys. 15, 341 (2019). [33] W. V. Budzinski, M. P. Ga unkel, and R. W. Ma kley, Magne ic field dependence o he su ace esis ance o pu e and impu e supe conduc ing aluminum a pho on ene gies nea he ene gy gap, Phys. Re . B 7, 1001 (1973). [34] F. S. Be ge e , M. Silae , P. Vi anen, and T. T. Heikkilä, Colloquium: Nonequilib ium e ec s in supe conduc o s wi h a spin-spli ing field, Re . Mod. Phys. 90, 041001 (2018). [35] T. T. Heikkilä, M. Silae , P. Vi anen, and F. S. Be ge e , The mal, elec ic and spin anspo in supe conduc o / e omagne ic-insula o s uc u es, P og. Su . Sci. 94, 100540 (2019). [36] D. Beckmann, Spin manipula ion in nanoscale supe conduc o s, J. Phys.: Condens. Ma e 28, 163001 (2016). [37] C. H. L. Quay and M. Ap ili, Ou -o -equilib ium spin anspo in mesoscopic supe conduc o s, Philos. T ans. R. Soc. A 376, 20150342 (2018). [38] F. Hüble , M. J. Wol , D. Beckmann, and H. . Löhneysen, Long-Range Spin-Pola ized Quasipa icle T anspo in Meso- scopic Al Supe conduc o s wi h a Zeeman Spli ing, Phys. Re . Le . 109, 207001 (2012). [39] M. J. Wol , C. Sü ge s, G. Fische , and D. Beckmann, Spin-pola ized quasipa icle anspo in exchange-spli supe - conduc ing aluminum on eu opium sulfide, Phys. Re . B 90, 144509 (2014). [40] M. Rouco, S. Chak abo y, F. Aikebaie , V. N. Golo ach, E. S ambini, J. S. Moode a, F. Giazo o, T. T. Heikkilä, and F. S. Be ge e , Cha ge anspo h ough spin-pola ized unnel junc- ion be ween wo spin-spli supe conduc o s, Phys. Re . B 100, 184501 (2019). [41] G. De Simoni, E. S ambini, J. S. Moode a, F. S. Be ge e , and F. Giazo o, Towa d he absolu e spin- al e e ec in supe con- duc ing unnel junc ions, Nano Le . 18, 6369 (2018). [42] E. S ambini, V. N. Golo ach, G. De Simoni, J. S. Moode a, F. S. Be ge e , and F. Giazo o, Re ealing he magne ic p oxim- i y e ec in EuS/Al bilaye s h ough supe conduc ing unneling spec oscopy, Phys. Re . Ma e . 1, 054402 (2017). [43] S. Kolenda, M. J. Wol , and D. Beckmann, Obse a ion o The moelec ic Cu en s in High-Field Supe conduc o - Fe omagne Tunnel Junc ions, Phys. Re . Le . 116, 097001 (2016). [44] M. J. Wol , F. Hüble , S. Kolenda, H. . Löhneysen, and D. Beckmann, Spin injec ion om a no mal me al in o a meso- scopic supe conduc o , Phys.Re .B87, 024517 (2013). [45] C. H. L. Quay, D. Che allie , C. Bena, and M. Ap ili, Spin imbalance and spin-cha ge sepa a ion in a mesoscopic supe - conduc o , Na . Phys. 9, 84 (2013). [46] C. H. L. Quay, C. Du eix, D. Che allie , C. Bena, and M. Ap ili, F equency-domain measu emen o he spin-imbalance li e ime in supe conduc o s, Phys.Re .B93, 220501(R) (2016). [47] J. Heid ich and D. Beckmann, Nonlocal he moelec ic e ec s in high-field supe conduc o - e omagne hyb id s uc u es, Phys. Re . B 100, 134501 (2019). [48] M. Silae , P. Vi anen, F. S. Be ge e , and T. T. Heikkilä, Long- Range Spin Accumula ion om Hea Injec ion in Mesoscopic Supe conduc o s wi h Zeeman Spli ing, Phys. Re . Le . 114, 167002 (2015). [49] I. V. Bobko a and A. M. Bobko , Long- ange spin imbalance in mesoscopic supe conduc o s unde Zeeman spli ing, JETP Le . 101, 118 (2015). [50] T. K ish op, M. Houze , and J. S. Meye , Nonequilib ium spin anspo in Zeeman-spli supe conduc o s, Phys. Re . B 91, 121407(R) (2015). 033416-8