Rhizomic communication practices bridging international students and the host society and beyond

This is a self-archived version of an original article. This version may differ from the original in pagination and typographic details. Author(s): Title: Year: Version: Copyright: Rights: Rights url: Please cite the original version: CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Rhizomic communication practices bridging international students and the host society and beyond © The Author(s) 2023 Published version Jokila, Suvi; Mathies, Charles Jokila, S., & Mathies, C. (2023). Rhizomic communication practices bridging international students and the host society and beyond. Higher Education, Early online. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01153-2 2023 Vol.:(0123456789) Higher Education https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01153-2 1 3 Rhizomic communication practices bridging international students andthehost society andbeyond SuviJokila1 · CharlesMathies2,3 Accepted: 28 November 2023 © The Author(s) 2023 Abstract Evidence suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted international student communities while reflecting wider societal inequalities. This study in the Finnish context examined international students’ experiences of the published national crisis communication and media usage during the first year of the pandemic. Using the national COVID-19 crisis communication practices as an example, we examined what kinds of strategies the international students deployed to access information in this non-English-speaking country and how they perceived the information communicated. Theoretically, we based the analysis on the theories of crisis communication and information inequality, which identify communication practices, such as language choice, that differentiate groups of people and impact their health outcomes. These are combined with rhizomic understanding, as reported by Deleuze and Guattari (1988/2020), of accessing media, and extended it to a mobile group of people (international students) living transnational lives. The data included interviews with international students studying at Finnish universities. The findings show that the students deployed five interlinked strategies to access information during the COVID-19 pandemic that highlight the heterogeneity of information and its usage, global asynchronousness of pandemic paths, and temporal changes in approaching information. Keywords COVID-19 pandemic· Communication· International student· Higher education Introduction Internationalization in higher education has led to an increasing number of students traveling abroad to pursue education. In fact, during the 20-year period between 1999 and 2019, the numbers of international students tripled from around two million to over six million * Suvi Jokila [email protected] Charles Mathies [email protected] 1 Department ofEducation, University ofTurku, Turku, Finland 2 Present Address: Department ofEducational Foundations & Leadership, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, USA 3 Finnish Institute forEducational Research, University ofJyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland Higher Education 1 3 (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2021). This trend has challenged national and institutional contexts to respond and develop their policies and practices to welcome the inflow of international students. As a result of increasing student mobility, the last decade has witnessed a surge in analyses of the complex relation between education and mobility (Robertson, 2013; Sá & Sabzalieva, 2018; Soong, 2016; Ziguras & McBurnie, 2015) that propose to scrutinize international student mobility beyond the spheres of education policy and educational institutions and aim to simultaneously understand the policies and everyday spheres that define the lives of international students and the potential disadvantages they face (Tannock, 2018). Ultimately, this body of work leads to analyses of the state’s role in framing international students’ lives in the host countries. Due to the increasing mobility of people, societies face issues of increasing language variation. This is especially so in countries where English does not hold an equal official status to the national language(s). Educational migration involves several policies and practices that together enable (or disable) the migration process. While previous research has tended to focus on the stage of entry to the host country or after graduation, Robertson (2013) advocated recognizing the overall study time as an unfolding migration process. During their studies abroad, international students may have varying roles, including student, worker, and migrant, which all have different framings for the international students (Maury, 2020; Robertson, 2013). Indeed, this also underlines the varying roles of the state in hosting mobile students. One way of looking at the position of international students within a state is through media spaces. Globally, although the media does not often shine a negative light on international students, their ambivalent positioning (including hope for revenue, skilled future labor, and targets of racism/discrimination) creates varied media representations. Besides their representations in media, international students’ media usage can contribute to their sense of belonging. For instance, Dwyer etal. (2021) suggested that both digital and legacy media structure students’ sense of belonging in the host country. Furthermore, Amoah and Mok’s (2022) study showed that during the COVID-19 crisis, informational support from the university was positively associated with international students’ well-being. To understand how international students navigate their host societies in these technology-driven times, researchers have employed the digital journey concept (Chang etal., 2021; Chang & Gomes, 2017; Qi etal., 2022), which pinpoints the nuanced ways in which international students must adapt and cross borders digitally to function in the society (Qi etal., 2022). In this study, we used the COVID-19 pandemic as a case to analyze crisis communication and how it dis/connected international students from/to their host country and beyond. Our aim was to understand what kinds of strategies international students in Finland adopted during the pandemic to obtain information. The study touched upon a particularly significant moment in mobile people’s lives, a pandemic situation, showing how complex the situation was for a group of mobile students living their transnational lives. Earlier work analyzing international students’ position during the pandemic showed that institutional policies regarding opening campuses affected international students by putting them and their local communities at a greater health risk (Whatley & Castiello-Gutiérrez, 2021). Qi and Ma’s (2021) study in the Australian context showed that the government excluded or left international students to fend for themselves during the pandemic. Although we can argue that the COVID-19 pandemic is an exceptional event, we also perceive that such a crisis condition brings to the surface the underlining practices that produce inequalities, such as how different communication practices exclude people. This study was situated in a sparsely inhabited northern non-English-speaking country, Finland, which has recruited an increasing number of international students to Higher Education 1 3 its universities. For the past 20 years, Finland has strived to boost the number of international students studying at Finnish higher education institutions, particularly those with the aim of obtaining a degree (Jokila etal., 2019). This has led to an increase in the overall international student body in higher education institutions from over 6100 in 2000 to almost 23,000 in 2020 (Vipunen, 2022). This policy initiative was based on several rationales, including internationalization at home, the need to recruit skilled labor for economic growth and revenue generation since the introduction of tuition fees in 2017 (Jokila, 2020; Kauko & Medvedeva, 2016; Mathies & Karhunen, 2021a, 2021b). This has resulted in the need for the government to develop its policies and practices to better accommodate the expanding student body through a faster visa procedure and smoother transition to Finnish work life (e.g., Talent Boost program). The language choices in the provision of degree programs to facilitate internationalization have been significant. In the late 1980s, Finland opted to establish Englishmedium educational programs for international students instead of building a system that would initially include language studies in the country’s official languages (Finnish or Swedish) and continue with subject studies (Jokila, 2020). The result of this decision is that Finland has the largest share of degree programs offered in English of any non-English-speaking European country (Wächter & Maiworm, 2014). Although these programs also offer opportunities to study Finland’s official languages, language has become an issue for international students in Finland. The internationalization of higher education in Finland has been normalizing the use of English as the main language of instruction, for instance, in international degree programs (Saarinen, 2020). Consequently, the language of instruction is one language (English), but this is not the dominant language in the society and labor market (Finnish and Swedish; Mathies & Karhunen, 2021a). Empirically, this study was based on interviews with international master’s students studying at Finnish universities. In this study, our research questions are (a) what strategies international students used to access information and (b) how they perceived the information communicated. We used the COVID-19 pandemic as a window of time to analyze these two sets of data, aiming to illustrate both the national media communication and international students’ descriptions of how they acted and accessed information during the pandemic. Theoretically, the analysis drew from previous work on crisis communication and information equality (Hyvärinen & Voss, 2016; Liu etal., 2016; Ramandhan & Viswanath, 2008; Sellnow & Seeger, 2013; Viswanath, 2006). We analyzed the communication practices and language choices in the Finnish national crisis communication during the pandemic as a rhizome (Deleuze & Guattari, 1988/2020), referring to the unstructured and evolving connections international students (in Finnish universities) described in accessing media during the pandemic. These connections were made and remade in the middle of the evolving situation. Communication forms the basis of social practices with the creation and continuation of social institutions (Voss & Lorenz, 2016) and higher education institutions. Thus, communication practices mediate international students’ sense of belonging in their local society. With its rhizomic theorization to international students and media, this paper contributes to the wider body of literature on how international students access media and digital spaces and content (e.g. Martin & Rizvi, 2014; Qi etal., 2022). Higher Education 1 3 Studying international student mobility andmedia To understand international students’ communication practices during the pandemic, we begin by introducing the work on media and international student mobility. As internationally mobile students increase in number, they become more visible in media spaces. Researchers have analyzed representations of international students as targets of student recruitment marketing (Bamberger etal., 2020; Jokila, 2019) and their representation in media content (Brooks, 2017). Others have recognized international students as users of digital spaces and noted that international mobility is not only physical but also digital (Qi etal., 2022). Authors have described international students studying during this technology-driven time as having a digital journey (Chang & Gomes, 2017) that includes “digital placemaking” (Qi etal., 2022) when entering a new locality. Chang and Gomes (2017) referred to the digital journey as the digital transition international students make in moving from one country to another. In their study, Qi etal. (2022) found that international students in the Chinese context needed to make a digital transition to the Chinese context to facilitate everyday life in China (e.g., moving from traditional payments to an almost fully digital wallet). A characteristic of international students’ media usage is the transnational aspect of connecting to the host country/city and home simultaneously (Martin & Rizvi, 2014). Martin and Rizvi (2014) showed how Chinese students in Australia used digital devices to enact their translocal subjectivities. In Dwyer etal.’s (2021) study, digital connectivity to home provided emotional comfort while international students experienced a push to their discomfort zone when staying abroad. This is in line with Masud’s (2020) argument that transnational media usage to connect with family and friends offers emotional support. Language also plays a role in digital mobility in the host country. In the Australian context, locals perceive international students as having limited English skills and do not recognize their other skills (Bodis, 2021). Moreover, Qi etal. (2022) noted that international students’ Chinese skills shaped their possibilities in digital spaces. The outbreak of the pandemic transformed the digital spaces and information that international students were accessing. The pandemic conditions and the information shared within the local context also affected international higher education students. In other words, the host country’s cultural, political, and economic norms and discourses greatly influenced international students’ meaning-making of new policies and information (Crumley-Effinger, 2021). This suggests that international students in different host countries made sense of the rapidly changing environment according to how the host country responded to COVID-19. Media andinformation duringthepandemic To develop an understanding of international student media usage, we built on work on information and crisis communication. During the pandemic, the role of information and media in disseminating (dis)information has been significant, and some have even referred to the situation as an infodemic, where too much information, both accurate and inaccurate, spreads, making it challenging to obtain the essential information (Pulido et al., 2020). Additionally, information flows have been global with international organizations, like the World Health Organization (2020), acting in visible roles, first, in defining the situation as Higher Education 1 3 a pandemic and then in continuing to monitor the situation. The pandemic has also provided a platform for competing expertise, where medical experts, politicians, and media actors with different agendas and perspectives have commented on the situation (Zielonka, 2021). Therefore, from the perspective of information and communication, the situation has been complex. For instance, European communication experts called for “ethical and effective communication” to combat the virus and save lives (European Public Relations Education and Research Association, 2021). Besides this distinctive global character, local and national media spaces have been employed to inform and communicate pandemic regulations, making it essential for individuals to follow multiple media spaces. There is a wide body of literature discussing crisis communication in conditions such as pandemics (e.g. Hyvärinen & Voss, 2016; Liu etal., 2016; Ramandhan & Viswanath, 2008; Sellnow & Seeger, 2013; Viswanath, 2006). Crisis communication often takes place during uncertain situations accompanied by time pressures. This was also the case at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic as the situation evolved. Crisis communication has a temporal dimension as theories distinguish different stages and phases of a crisis that underline the different communication needs (Sellnow & Seeger, 2013). Focusing on crisis communication directs our attention away from biophysical events, which are often the center of attention, and towards analyzing the sociological perspective (Voss & Lorenz, 2016). It is through communication that people learn to see and understand the world. An event of the magnitude of the COVID-19 pandemic was not predictable, yet it did not come as a complete surprise, as there was evidence suggesting an event like this might happen at some point. Therefore, this study concerned the information conveyed, particularly how the risk, damage, or safety instructions were communicated. In this context, one cannot equate communication with language or linguistic information, as the very genesis of information occurs through and in the process of communication (see Hyvärinen & Voss, 2016; Sellnow & Seeger, 2013). Communication forms the basis of social practices along with the creation and continuation of social institutions (Voss & Lorenz, 2016) and higher education institutions. Thus, for international students, communication practices mediate the sense of belonging to the local society. Crisis communication generates specific forms of expression as means of achieving mutual understanding. Crisis communication theories explain what should have been communicated, what was and was not prepared beforehand, and what did or did not get communicated (see Hyvärinen & Voss, 2016; Sellnow & Seeger, 2013). In other words, these theories help us understand the position of international students within the communication practices of their setting. From a constructivist perspective, the measures implemented are based on how the actors involved in defining and interpreting the information actually act (Voss & Lorenz, 2016). During the COVID-19 crisis, communication measures focused on preventing the spread of the virus and in providing everyone with a sense of agency in their life despite the uncertainty of the situation. A concept related to crisis communication is informational inequality, which posits that different segments within a community have differences in the information they receive and the medium through which they receive it (Ramandhan & Viswanath, 2008; Viswanath, 2006). One of the social inequalities responsible for this gap among segments is literacy and language skills. Those with low literacy and/or language skills have barriers to receiving messages (Viswanath, 2006). This can be an issue among highly educated students living in non-English-speaking countries with small language footprints. To understand international students’ connectivity to different media spaces during COVID-19, we employed a rhizomic understanding of connections (Deleuze & Guattari, 1988/2020) students hadwith media spaces enabling them to approach student and media Higher Education 1 3 connectivities as constantly evolving and complex. Employing Deleuze and Guattari’s (1988/2020) understanding of a rhizome provided insight into how international students consume information during the early stages of the pandemic: “[a] rhizome has no beginning or end; it is always in the middle, between things, interbeing, intermezzo. The tree is filiation, but the rhizome is alliance, uniquely alliance” (p. 26). The pandemic produced numerous coping strategies, and international students did not act to find all possible information but rather exhibited various ways of connecting to media spaces (in the utopian sense, the “ideal” citizen would interact with the publicly communicated information and follow the given instructions). Deleuze and Guattari defined four principles that shape a rhizome. The first principle is connection and the second is heterogeneity, which refers to the ability to transform into something different. The third principle is multiplicity, referring to the multiple nature of a rhizome. The fourth principle is rupture, which refers to disconnecting and then assuming another form. Being rhizomic underlines uncertainty and unpredictability in life (Samson etal., 2022), which was evident during the pandemic as, even though the overall global situation was new, this was also a new situation for international students. Everyone was craving accurate knowledge to understand the situation and act in the best possible way. In their study, Sederholm etal. (2021) argued that the coronavirus’s rhizomic information structure and the uncontrollable spread of information enabled the spread of misinformation. Working with the rhizomic understanding led us to consider the relations as becoming and approaching it from the middle rather than aiming to define a start and finish (Deleuze & Guattari, 1988/2020). This idea is relevant in understanding how people acted during the pandemic as they needed to cope with the situation and find the information in an evolving situation. Media spaces and how people related to them reflect a complex rhizome of actors and devices producing news and information. In addition to news and other such agencies, public authorities communicated their activities and practices directly to the public primarily through websites and social media channels, such as Twitter. We conceptualized this complex media space as evolving and constantly reforming as information was updated and changed rather than being fixed. Media space inFinland duringthepandemic For the Finnish government, similar to many other countries, the evolving pandemic conditions created challenges. The outbreak and global spread of COVID-19 was unexpected as it seemed rather distant from Finland in its early stages. The situation, however, developed rather quickly calling for quick policy responses in an unknown situation. The pandemic response developed over time from an intensified early shock stage to a temporally prolonged crisis, which called for new communication processes. The handling of the pandemic in Finland evinced the power of the state and authority in the country in an unforeseen way (Moisio, 2020). The instructions were heavily reliant on the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) for health and safety research and recommendations during the pandemic (Moisio, 2020). A year after the start of the pandemic, the Finnish government ordered an assessment of its crisis management (Deloitte, 2021). While the report noted that Finland was not well prepared for this grave crisis, the interviewed civil servants and politicians perceived its civil communication as one of the successful aspects. The report did not, however, discuss or analyze the language choices in the government’s communication (Deloitte, 2021). Higher Education 1 3 Finland is a bilingual country with Finnish and Swedish as its two official languages. According to Government Communication Strategy (Finnish Government, 2019), the objective is to provide information in the official languages and selected information in English: “Everybody affected by government decisions has the right to receive information on those decisions in understandable Finnish and Swedish1. All key decisions will also be translated into English” (p. 9). From the perspective of mobile people (including international students), this issue becomes more complex insituations like the pandemic. The language discrepancies between the academic and societal contexts became more apparent during the pandemic and illuminated the need for more information in English (Jokila & Filippou, 2021). In practice, the government followed this policy of communicating in the official languages and we found discrepancies in official sources of communication. We observed there were disseminations of official policies in Finnish while the authorities translated what they perceived as the most significant aspects into English. For example, the Finnish government employed many channels in their crisis communication, including regular briefings (TV, radio, and internet/news content) and communication from different ministries (Twitter and websites). These mostly targeted Finnish-speaking audiences. The government translated the content of briefings to English and communicated primarily through Yle’s (the national broadcasting agency) English content. For the Finnish-speaking audience, TV shows constituted a significant communication channel which provided context and depth in understanding why the measures were necessary; shows such as A-studio (https:// areena. yle. fi/1- 32512 27), for example, discussed the current situation of the pandemic. For the non-Finnish-speaking audience, there were fewer options for discussing measures as Finnish was almost the exclusive language on these communication forums. One English communication channel was “All points north,” a weekly podcast on life and news in Finland, but it did not focus solely on communicating pandemic-related information and aired only once a week. The Ministry of Education and Culture, via its website, communicated instructions to the education sector, including higher education. These were predominantly in Finnish with a shorter English translation. Social media channels, especially Twitter, became official communication channels that the government and Finnish officials used to communicate and disseminate their messages quickly (Finnish Government, 2022). While highlighting the significance of international students to Finland and acknowledging their situation, the positioning of international students was first and foremost as students within an institution rather than, for instance, “citizens” in the country. Indications of this appeared in the Ministry of Education and Culture’s tweets. On its official account on 31 March 2020, the ministry noted, “Finland welcomes international students and researchers, in all circumstances.” It continued by stating, “[u]niversities and universities of applied sciences are there for all students and staff. Be active and stay in contact with your own institution.” This, in essence, pushed the responsibility for COVID-19-related information and communication about regulations to higher education institutions. While this was a new role for Finnish higher education institutions and obviously were highly involved in the distribution of information to international students, the role and practices of Finnish institutions are not the focus of this study and beyond the scope of this study fully examined. 1 In this study, we do not focus on the role of Swedish in crisis communication in Finland. Higher Education 1 3 The significance of accessing media spaces and up-to-date information became evident in spring 2021 when the international students’ situation came into the spotlight in Finnish media due to outbreaks in exchange student communities. Subsequently, university student groups called for better communication of the regulations (Yle, 2021). According to a news piece, non-governmental organizations took the initiative to inform immigrants (including international students) in Finland about the regulations in English (Yle, 2021). Method Our research questions are (a) what strategies international students used to access information and (b) how international students perceive the information that was communicated. We are particularly interested in the international students’ perspective in both questions. In our analysis, we focus on how international students engaged with media and news content. This is in line with Deuchar’s (2022) argument for focusing on international students’ practices, and thus their agency, rather than their experiences. Thus, this approach highlights international students’ agency rather than perceiving them only as a vulnerable group of students. Participants andinterviews We used interviews to develop an understanding of international students’ strategies to access and perceive information during the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland. Specifically, we analyzed interviews with international master’s students in spring 2020 (n = 33) and follow-up interviews in spring 2021 (n = 23). These interview data are part of a larger research project, International students in times of crisis, focused on studying international students’ experiences and practices during the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland. We conducted interviews predominantly virtually via Zoom or Teams. Although conducting interviews online during the pandemic presented challenges for researchers (Howlett, 2022), meeting online also provided a safe space health-wise allowing reflection on the situation. When inviting respondents to participate in this study, we presented them with a privacy notice detailing how we would handle their data. We also provided information about the ethical steps we would take during the study, such as confidentiality and the right to withdraw from the study. Participants were a highly varied group of students, including students with a (Finnish) spouse and/or child in Finland and single students. They were all registered to complete their master’s degree at a Finnish university and perceived themselves as international students. We recruited interviewees on the basis of the willingness they expressed to take part in the interviews in a survey (n = 192) of international students in Finnish higher education institutions at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to inviting surveyed students to take part in the interviews, we used a snowball method to increase the number of participants. We acknowledge a limitation of this approach is that the students participating in this study might not be fully representative of the international student body in Finnish universities. Table1 displays the interviewees’ demographic information. In semi-structured interviews (Rubin & Rubin, 2005) lasting from half an hour to over two hours, we asked comprehensive questions about the participants’ lives including their studies, financial situation, daily practices, and media usage during the pandemic. We selected themes according to what shapes international students’ lives take during their Higher Education 1 3 networks that were following the current information: “No, I don’t want to. I sometimes ask my boyfriend, how many percent is vaccinated already, or how’s the situation in Finland?” When the pandemic situation evolved, the international students also started to focus on the development of vaccines and the pandemic, to some extent, started to become one aspect of everyday life without changing people’s behavior that much: My behavior doesn’t really change anymore, at the moment. I’m careful. I have my mask; I wear it in every public place – supermarket, train. Now, if they would say the cases are rising, I mean, I could put on two masks. But there’s not much more I can do. (James) This shows the temporality of the pandemic: the students started to get used to it and evolved their media and information consumption and their personal practices with the ebbs and flows of the pandemic. For international students in Finland, this meant they generally followed the recommendations from the government as compared to many other countries, Finland did not impose heavy, obligatory measures in its COVID strategy. They offered recommendations and suggestions (Moisio, 2020) that were efficient as the majority of residences mainly followed them. Discussion: making sense ofthemess In this paper, we have discussed the strategies international students used to access and perceive information during the COVID-19 pandemic. We base our argument on crisis communication (Hyvärinen & Voss, 2016; Sellnow & Seeger, 2013), information inequality literature (Ramandhan & Viswanath, 2008; Viswanath, 2006), and the rhizomic nature of accessing information (Deleuze & Guattari, 1988/2020). We used these theoretical frameworks as we analyzed the communication practices and language choices in Finland’s national crisis communication during the pandemic and how international students engaged with them. In our study, we could observe asynchronous and asymmetrical pandemic paths that contributed to the information international students were accessing not only in Finland but also beyond. This study outlines the simultaneity of different media and digital spaces (Martin & Rizvi, 2014) and digital in-betweenness (Qi etal., 2022) in which the students were involved and the important health-related information they accessed during the pandemic. This study, then, confirms that studying abroad is not only a physical transition from one locality to another but also a digital journey (Chang & Gomes, 2017) that has a significant transnational character (Martin & Rizvi, 2014) in the simultaneity of media spaces used. We found that COVID-19-related information was available and was communicated differently to different language groups in the national media space, and some international students needed more information about the local Finnish context in English. This supports the theory of information inequality in the health communication literature positing that community members receive information differently and use diverse media to receive it (Ramandhan & Viswanath, 2008; Viswanath, 2006). One of the social inequalities responsible for gaps (differences) among groups in terms of the information they receive and their understanding of it is the level of literacy and language skills. Those with low literacy and/ or language skills face significant barriers to accessing information and understanding its meaning (Viswanath, 2006). This can present an issue for highly educated people living Higher Education 1 3 in non-English countries with small language footprints. In health-related situations, these barriers to accessing and understanding information lead to increased health risks for those with low literacy and/or language skills (Ramandhan & Viswanath, 2008; Viswanath, 2006). Although we have shown the significance of language in communicating information during a crisis, through our analysis, we hope to have shown why it is too simplistic to discuss national communication practices merely as the language of choice. We suggest that international students’ connections to media spaces form a rhizome (Deleuze & Guattari, 1988/2020), referring to the continuously evolving and unstructured connections international students (in Finnish higher education) describe in accessing media and making sense of the messages. Using the rhizome concept to understand media communication and related practices for accessing information enables us to move beyond a structural understanding of top-down direct communication practices and identify many nuanced strings individuals use to connect to information and communication. We observed that as the pandemic persisted, international students started to adjust to the situation and began to avoid accessing information. This is also instrumental in understanding how to plan the dissemination of crisis communication during a situation like a pandemic. While Sellnow and Seeger (2013) suggest there are stages or phases that underlie the different communication needs in a crisis, the evidence here suggests that these were not so clear or linear; where one moves from one stage or phase into the next. Rather, the evidence points to an unstructured and constantly evolving process of capturing and understanding information on COVID-19. We argue Deleuze and Guattari’s (1988/2020) rhizome concept is helpful in understanding how international students access communication during the COVID-19 pandemic as their four principles (connection, heterogeneity, multiplicity, and ruptures) of a rhizome were clearly visible across the five themes. From a temporal aspect, what perhaps was the clearest was consistent and constant changing in information gathering. There was a constant tension between the need and desire for information, being able to access accurate information, the need to take a break from information for mental health reasons. By showing how mobile people connect to various local, national, and transnational media and information in diversified rhizomic ways, this study provides theoretical implications for communication practices for international students. While Amoah and Mok (2022) identified a positive association between the university’s informational support and well-being, our findings show the more nuanced and complex ways the students were connected to the national and international media. International students gained information from official Finnish and international media as well as through private contacts. This created a situation where there was contradictory information and individuals needed to assess the information’s accuracy. From the perspective of effective crisis communication (Sellnow & Seeger, 2013), this is problematic as international students, like everyone else, need accurate information. Conclusion COVID-19 has had a profound impact on international higher education and societies in general. Many international students were stuck in their host countries in lockdowns and border closures while others might experience difficulties after returning back home. COVID-19 challenged governments, institutions, students, and staff. Its effects are still Higher Education 1 3 ongoing and likely will carry forward for the foreseeable future. But there are a few key takeaways that the crisis is another evolution of COVID-19 or another crisis altogether. First, the practical implications of this study suggest the need for accurate, timely information and information in languages that reach all residents. This includes international students. This means imbedding within the crisis communication strategy, nationally or institutionally, a plan to ensure clear and up-to-date information is not only available but also accessible (e.g., in multiple languages) and complete (i.e., not shortened versions of the official languages of a country). Additionally, the observation of students restricting the information flow in the prolonged crisis condition highlights the need to consider appropriate communication channels and means of reaching the students. Second, international students will access transnational information and communication networks in a time of crisis. In a situation like COVID-19 that was constantly evolving and involved serious medical complications, national and institutional communication networks, practices, and strategies may not be enough. Host institutions and countries have a duty to care for international students as they would their domestic students. This means ensuring the same information available to local students is just as accessible to their international student populations. Third, from a theoretical perspective, Deleuze and Guattari’s (1988/2020) rhizome conception was helpful in making sense of how international students accessed and perceived the information provided during COVID-19. The four principles of a rhizome (connection, heterogeneity, multiplicity, and ruptures) made clear how unpredictable and constantly changing the environment was during this period. Each of the five identified themes showed evidence of this constant and every changing temporal quality; there was always a need for updated information due to the constantly changing environment which required students adjusting their sources and amount of information consumed. There were also clear evidence of international students experiencing informational inequality (Ramandhan & Viswanath, 2008; Viswanath, 2006). They experienced higher health and safety risks largely due to lower Finnish literacy and language skills than the general population, the language and literacy skills of the host country. As this study involved international students studying at Finnish universities during the pandemic, further studies are needed to elaborate on the phenomenon in other countries. As noted previously, our method of recruiting participants in interviews might not have led to a full representative of all international students in Finland. Lastly, expanding the analysis of media usage to local students would increase our understanding of the higher education student population as a whole and the strategies they used. Funding Open Access funding provided by University of Turku (including Turku University Central Hospital). Declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Higher Education 1 3 References Alho, R. (2020). ‘You need to know someone who knows someone’: International students’ job search experiences. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 10(2), 3–22. Amoah, P. A., & Mok, E. W. C. (2022). COVID-19 and well-being of non-local students: Implications for international higher education governance. Higher Education Policy, 35, 651–672. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1057/ s41307- 022- 00270-4 Bamberger, A., Bronshtein, Y., & Yemini, M. (2020). Marketing universities and targeting international students: A comparative analysis of social media data trails. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 476–492. Bodis, A. (2021). ‘Double deficit’ and exclusion: Mediated language ideologies and international students’ multilingualism. Multilingua, 40(3), 367–391. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1515/ multi- 2019- 0106 Brooks, R. (2017). Representations of East Asian students in the UK media. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(14), 2363–2377. Chang, S., & Gomes, C. (2017). Digital journeys: A perspective on understanding the digital experiences of international students. Journal of International Students, 7(2), 347–366. https:// doi. org/ 10. 32674/ jis. v7i2. 385 Chang, S., Gomes, C., Platt, M., Trumpour, S., McKay, D., & Alzougool, B. (2021). Mapping the contours of digital journeys: A study of international students’ social networks in Australian higher education. Higher Education Research and Development. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 07294 360. 2021. 19628 12 Crumley-Effinger, M. (2021). International students at the intersection of local policy and global emergency. In K. Bista, R. Allen, & R. Chan (Eds.), Impacts of COVID-19 on international students and the future of student mobility (pp. 147–161). Routledge. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2020). A thousand plateaus. Bloomsbury (Original work published 1988). Deloitte. (2021). Selvitys koronakriisin aikana toteutetun valtioneuvoston kriisijohtamisen ja valmiuslain käyttöönoton kokemuksista [Report on the experiences of Finnish Government’s crisis management and implementation of the ‘preparedness law’ during the COVID-19 pandemic]. Valtioneuvoston selvitys. Deuchar, A. (2022). The problem with international students’ ‘experiences’ and the promise of their practices: Reanimating research about international students in higher education. British Educational Research Journal. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ berj. 3779 Dwyer, T., Kanai, A., Pfefferkorn, J., Fan, J., & Lambert, A. (2021). Media comforts and international student mobility: Managing hopes, host and home. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 42(4), 406–422. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 07256 868. 2021. 19392 77 European Public Relations Education and Research Association. (2021). Statement on communication of COVID-19 pandemic. https:// eupre ra. org/ 2021/ 04/ 15/ commu nicat ionsaves- lifescommu nicat ionexper tscall- forethic al- and- effec tivecommu nicat ions- to- handlecovid- 19- globalpande mic/ Finnish Government. (2019). Government communication strategy. https:// valti oneuv osto. fi/ en/ marin/ gover nmentprogr amme/ gover nmentcommu nicat ionsstrat egy. Valti oneuv osto Finnish Government. (2022). Social media. https:// valti oneuv osto. fi/ en/ socialmedia. Valti oneuv osto Howlett, M. (2022). Looking at the ‘field’ through a Zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. Qualitative Research, 22(3), 387–402. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 14687 94120 985691 Hyvärinen, J., & Voss, M. (2016). Communication concerning disasters and pandemics: Coproducing community resilience and crisis response. In A. Schwarz, M. W. Seeger, & C. Auer (Eds.), The handbook of international crisis communication research (pp. 96–107). Wiley-Blackwell. Jokila, S. (2019). International student recruitment strategies in Finland and China: An analysis of website content. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 3(4), 1–17. https:// doi. org/ 10. 7577/ njcie. 3426 Jokila, S. (2020). From inauguration to commercialisation: Incremental yet contested transitions redefining the national interests of international degree programmes in Finland. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(2), 143–156. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 20020 317. 2020. 17450 16 Jokila, S., & Filippou, K. (2021). Kansainvälisten opiskelijoiden kokema tuen tarve pandemian aikana [Support needs of the international students during the pandemic]. Tiedepolitiikka, 46(4), 21–26. Jokila, S., Kallo, J., & Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (2019). From crisis to opportunities: Justifying and persuading national policy for international student recruitment. European Journal of Higher Education, 9(4), 393–411. Kauko, J., & Medvedeva, A. (2016). Internationalisation as marketisation? Tuition fees for international students in Finland. Research in Comparative and International Education, 11(1), 98–114. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 17454 99916 631061 Higher Education 1 3 Koo, K. (2021). Distressed in a foreign country: Mental health and well-being among international students in the United States during COVID-19. In K. Bista, R. Allen, & R. Chan (Eds.), Impacts of COVID-19 on international students and the future of student mobility (pp. 28–41). Routledge. Koo, K., & Nyunt, G. (2022). Pandemic in a foreign country: Barriers to international students’ well-being during COVID-19. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 19496 591. 2022. 20564 76 Korhonen, V. (2015). Ajelehtien kulttuurien välisessä tilassa? Kansainvälisten tutkinto-opiskelijoiden integraatiokokemukset ja odotukset sijoittumisestaan suomalaisille työmarkkinoille [Drifting in the space between cultures: International degree students’ integration experiences and expectations into the Finnish labour market]. Ammattikasvatuksen Aikakauskirja, 17(2), 44–60 http:// elekt ra. helsi nki. fi/ oa/ 2489- 5822/ 17/2/ ajele hti. pdf Liu, B. F., Bartzb, L., & Duke, N. (2016). Communicating crisis uncertainty: A review of the knowledge gaps. Public Relations Review, 42, 479–487. Martin, F., & Rizvi, F. (2014). Making Melbourne: Digital connectivity and international students’ experience of locality. Media, Culture and Society, 36(7), 1016–1031. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 01634 43714 541223 Masud, M. M. H. (2020). International student migration and polymedia: The use of communication media by Bangladeshi students in Germany. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 5(3), 95–110. Mathies, C., & Karhunen, H. (2021a). Do they stay or go? Analysis of international students in Finland. Globalissation, societies, and education, 19(3), 298–310. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 14767 724. 2020. 18169 26 Mathies, C., & Karhunen, H. (2021b). International student migration in Finland: The role of graduation on staying. Journal of International Students, 11(4), 874–894. https:// doi. org/ 10. 32674/ jis. v11i4. 2427 Maury, O. (2020). Between a promise and a salary: Student-migrant-workers’ experiences of precarious labour markets. Work, Employment and Society, 34(5), 809–825. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 09500 17019 887097 Moisio, S. (2020). State power and the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Finland. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 61(4-5), 598–605. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 15387 216. 2020. 17822 41 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Education at a glance. Figure B6.3. OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing. Price, M., Legrand, A. C., Brier, Z. M. F., van Stolk-Cooke, K., Peck, K., Dodds, P. S., Danforth, C.M, Adams, Z. W. (2022). Doomscrolling during COVID-19: The negative association between daily social and traditional media consumption and mental health symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. PsyArXiv 14(8), 1338–1346. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ tra00 01202 Pulido, C. M., Villarejo-Carballido, B., Redondo-Sama, G., & Gómez, A. (2020). COVID-19 infodemic: More retweets for science-based information on coronavirus than for false information. International Sociology, 35(4), 377–392. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 02685 80920 914755 Qi, J., & Ma, C. (2021). Australia’s crisis responses during COVID-19: The case of international students. Journal of International Students, 11(S2), 94–111. https:// doi. org/ 10. 32674/ jis. v11iS2. 3578 Qi, J., Shen, W., & Dai, K. (2022). From digital shock to miniaturised mobility: International students’ digital journey in China. Journal of Studies in International Education, 26(2), 128–144. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 10283 15321 10651 35 Ramandhan, S., & Viswanath, K. (2008). Communication inequality. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication (pp. 1–6). John Wiley & Sons. Robertson, S. (2013). Transnational student-migrants and the state: The education-migration nexus. Springer. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Designing main questions and probes. SAGE Publications. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4135/ 97814 52226 651 Sá, C. M., & Sabzalieva, E. (2018). The politics of the great brain race: Public policy and international student recruitment in Australia, Canada, England and the USA. Higher Education, 75, 231–253. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10734- 017- 0133-1 Saarinen, T. (2020). Higher education, language and new nationalism in Finland: Recycled histories. Palgrave Macmillan. Samson, S., Hutchings, C., Goolam Hoosen, T., & Thesen, L. (2022). ‘I am everywhere all at once’: Pipelines, rhizomes and research writing. Higher Education, 83, 1207–1223. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10734- 021- 00738-z Sederholm, T., Jääskeläinen, P., & Huhtinen, A.-M. (2021). Coronavirus as a rhizome: The pandemic of disinformation. International Journal of Cyber Warfare and Terrorism, 11(2), 43–55. Sellnow, T. L., & Seeger, M. W. (2013). Theorizing crisis communication. John Wiley & Sons. Soong, H. (2016). Transnational students and mobility lived experiences of migration. Routledge. Higher Education 1 3 Tannock, S. (2018). Educational equality and international students: Justice across borders? Springer. Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. The University of Chicago Press. Vipunen. (2022). Korkeakoulujen ulkomaalaiset opiskelijat [Foreign students in higher education institutions]. https:// vipun en. fi/ fifi/_ layou ts/ 15/ xlvie wer. aspx? id=/ fifi/ Rapor tit/ Korke akoul utuks enulk omaal aiset opisk elijatnäkökulma vuosi. xlsb Viswanath, K. (2006). Public communications and its role in reducing and eliminating health disparities. In G. E. Thomson, F. Mitchell, & M. B. Williams (Eds.), Examining the health disparities research plan of the National Institutes of Health: Unfinished business (pp. 215–253). National Academies Press. Voss, M., & Lorenz, D. F. (2016). Sociological foundations of crisis communication. In A. Schwarz, M. W. Seeger, & C. Auer (Eds.), The handbook of international crisis communication research (pp. 45–55). Wiley-Blackwell. Wächter, B., & Maiworm, F. (2014). English-taught programmes in European higher education: The state of play in 2014. Lemmens Medien GmbH. http:// www. acasecre tariat. be/ filea dmin/ aca_ docs/ images/ membe rs/ ACA- 2015_ Engli sh_ Taught_ 01. pdf Whatley, M., & Castiello-Gutiérrez, S. (2021). Balancing finances, politics, and public health: International student enrollment and reopening plans at US higher education institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10734- 021- 00768-7 World Health Organization. (2020, March 11). Breaking: Coronavirus disease [Tweet]. Twitter. https:// twitt er. com/ WHO/ status/ 12377 77021 74233 8049 Yle. (2021). As COVID spreads at exchange student events, university groups call for better information. https:// yle. fi/ uutis et/ osasto/ news/ as_ covid_ sprea ds_ at_ excha nge_ stude nt_ events_ unive rsity_ groups_ call_ for_ better_ infor mation/ 11836 405 Yle. (2022). Yle news: About us. https:// yle. fi/ news/3- 12169 597 Ytre-Arne, B., & Moe, H. (2021). Doomscrolling, monitoring and avoiding: News use in COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Journalism Studies, 22(13), 1739–1755. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 14616 70X. 2021. 19524 75 Zielonka, J. (2021). Who should be in charge of pandemics? Scientists or politicians? In G. Delanty (Ed.), Pandemics, politics, and society: Critical perspectives on the COVID-19 crisis (pp. 59–73). De Gruyter. Ziguras, C., & McBurnie, G. (2015). Governing cross-border higher education. Routledge. Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.