scieee Open visual document viewer

Neglecting diurnal variations leads to uncertainties in terrestrial nitrous oxide emissions

Shurpali, Narasinha J.,Rannik, Üllar,Jokinen, Simo,Lind, Saara,Biasi, Christina,Mammarella, Ivan,Peltola, Olli,Pihlatie, Mari,Hyvönen, Niina,Räty, Mari,Haapanala, Sami,Zahniser, Mark,Virkajärvi, Perttu,Vesala, Timo,Martikainen, Pertti J.

Full text

1 Scien i ic RepoR s | 6:25739 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep25739 www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s Neglec ing diu nal a ia ions leads o unce ain ies in e es ial ni ous oxide emissions Na asinha J. Shu pali1, Ülla Rannik2, Simo Jokinen1, Saa a Lind1, Ch is ina Biasi1, I an Mamma ella2, Olli Pel ola2, Ma i Pihla ie2,3, Niina Hy önen1, Ma i Rä y4, Sami Haapanala2, Ma k Zahnise 5, Pe u Vi kajä i4, Timo Vesala2,6,7 & Pe i J. Ma ikainen1 Ni ous oxide (N2O) is an impo an g eenhouse gas p oduced in soil and aqua ic ecosys ems. I s wa ming po en ial is 296 imes highe han ha o CO2. Mos N2O emission measu emen s made so a a e limi ed in empo al and spa ial esolu ion causing unce ain ies in he global N2O budge . Recen ad ances in lase spec oscopic echniques p o ide an excellen ool o a ea-in eg a ed, di ec and con inuous ield measu emen s o N2O luxes using he eddy co a iance me hod. By employing his echnique on an ag icul u al si e wi h ou lase -based analyse s, we show he e ha N2O exchange exhibi s con as ing diu nal beha iou depending upon soil ni ogen a ailabili y. When soil N was high due o e ilize applica ion, N2O emissions we e highe du ing day ime han du ing he nigh . Howe e , when soil N became limi ed, emissions we e highe du ing he nigh han du ing he day. These e e se diu nal pa e ns suppo ed by iso opic analyses may indica e a dominan ole o plan s on mic obial p ocesses associa ed wi h N2O exchange. This s udy highligh s he po en ial o new echnologies in imp o ing es ima es o global N2O sou ces. Ni ous oxide (N2O) is among he mos impo an g eenhouse gases (GHGs). I is p oduced bo h in na u al and managed soils, wi h ag icul u al soils being he la ges an h opogenic sou ce1,2. Despi e he ecen p og ess in quan i ying he di e se N2O sou ces, he ange o he global es ima e is s ill la ge a ying om 8.1–30.7 Tg N (N2O) a−1 (ac oss all na u al and an h opogenic sou ces) owing p ima ily o he s agge ing spa io empo al a - ia ion in he luxes3. Recen ly, a emp s ha e been made o p esen a comp ehensi e es ima e o he global N2O emissions using obse a ions, bo om-up and in e sion models4. Despi e he u iliza ion o all cu en ly a ailable global da a on N2O emissions om a ious sou ce sec o s, he o e a ching goal o educing he la ge unce ain y in global N2O budge s ill emains a o midable ask. Addi ionally, ou cu en p ocess le el unde s anding o he ac o s egula ing N2O emissions a a gi en si e is a om comple e5,6. As a gene al me hod, s a ic chambe s a e widely used o measu e soil N2O luxes expe imen ally7–11. Mos N2O exchange measu emen s a e made using manual chambe s leading o spa se empo al esolu ion in he da a. To o e come hese disc epancies, mic ome eo ological me hods (such as he eddy co a iance (EC) echnique) a e being inc easingly applied o con inuous measu emen s o N2O exchange12–14. This me hod o e s he ad an age o in eg a ing N2O luxes o e la ge a eas. Un il ecen ly, howe e , he lack o app op ia e gas analyse s wi h a su icien ime esponse and p ecision has been a majo limi a ion. Wi h he ecen de elopmen o lase -based spec oscopic echniques, as and accu a e measu emen s in conjunc ion wi h he EC o au oma ic chambe echniques a e now possible14–18 allowing accu a e s udies on he empo al a ia ion o N2O luxes. As a pa o he In eg a ed Ca bon Obse a ion Sys em (ICOS), a Eu opean in as uc u e p og am dedica ed o high p ecision moni o ing o g eenhouse gases, we conduc ed an EC based in e -compa ison ield campaign18 u ilizing ou di e en N2O analyze s. Ni ous oxide lux measu emen s we e made o e an ag icul u al ield si e 1Biogeochemis y esea ch g oup, Depa men o En i onmen al and Biological Sciences, Uni e si y o Eas e n Finland, Yliopis o an a 1D E, PO Box 1627, Kuopio campus, FI-70211 Finland. 2Depa men o Physics, P.O. Box 48, Uni e si y o Helsinki, 00014 Finland. 3Depa men o Food and En i onmen al Sciences, Di ision o Mic obiology and Bio echnology, P.O. Box 56, Uni e si y o Helsinki, FI-00014 Finland. 4Na u al Resou ces Ins i u e Finland, G een echnology, Halolan ie 31A Maaninka FI-71750, Finland. 5Ae odyne Resea ch, Inc., 45 Manning Road Bille ica, MA 01821-3976, USA. 6Viikki Plan Science Cen e, Uni e si y o Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, FI-00014 Finland. 7Depa men o Fo es Sciences, P. O. Box 27, Uni e si y o Helsinki, 00014 Finland. Co espondence and eques s o ma e ials should be add essed o N.J.S. (email: na asinha.shu pali@ue . i) ecei ed: 19 Ma ch 2015 Accep ed: 21 Ap il 2016 Published: 09 May 2016 OPEN www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/ 2 Scien i ic RepoR s | 6:25739 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep25739 (in eas e n Finland) cul i a ed wi h eed cana y g ass (RCG, Phala is a undinaceae, L.), a pe ennial c op, om Ap il un il No embe in 2011 (Supplemen a y In o ma ion). The soil mois u e and empe a u e du ing he pe iod (Supplemen a y Fig. S1) we e ypical o condi ions du - ing la e sp ing, summe and ea ly au umn in his ecosys em. The mean olume ic wa e con en in he soil p o ile (0–100 cm deep) du ing ea ly May was high (0.63 ± 0.1 cm3 cm−3) owing o he mel ing o snow since Ap il. Wi h soil p o ile empe a u es s eadily inc easing om 2.5 °C (wi h a s anda d de ia ion o 2.5 °C) in ea ly May o 11.6 °C ( ± 2.7 °C) by ea ly June, mois u e con en in all soil laye s showed a s eady decline. Soil mois u e con en emained s able a 0.25 cm3 cm−3 ( ± 0.04 cm3 cm−3) du ing June o mid-Sep embe . The luc ua ions in soil mois- u e con en we e less p onounced wi h soil dep h. Soil empe a u es peaked a 15.7 °C ( ± 1.6 °C) du ing he sec- ond week o July. Towa ds he end o he s udy pe iod, soil mois u e con en was high and soil empe a u es we e low. The O2 concen a ions in he i s 30 cm o he soil p o ile s ayed high (be ween 15 and 21%) h oughou he obse a ion pe iod (Supplemen a y Fig. S1). Howe e , O2 concen a ions we e low and a ied widely a deepe soil laye s indica ing oxygen limi a ions in hese laye s. Wa e illed po e space (WFPS) which egula es soil gas di usion a e, a ied be ween 60–100% du ing he ea ly pa , 20–60% du ing he middle pa o he season and emained abo e 60% du ing he la e pa o he s udy pe iod (Supplemen a y Fig. S1) wi h he su ace soil laye s gene ally exhibi ing highe a ia ion in WFPS h oughou he season. An emission pulse (up o 33 mg m−2 d−1) ha occu ed wi hin 24 hou s o he applica ion o an N-P-K-S e ilize con aining 76 kg N ha−1 cha ac e ized he seasonal pa e n o N2O exchange om he RCG cul i a ion sys em. This high N2O emission ac i i y las ed abou 15 days (days 143–158, e e ed o he ea e as he high emission pe iod, Fig.1A). Following his pe iod, emissions declined o backg ound le els o abou 1 mg m−2 d−1 (low emission pe iod). All ope a ional N2O gas analyze s showed a simila seasonal pa e n o N2O exchange. I is ele an he e o dwell on he seasonal plan g ow h pa e n in conjunc ion wi h he abo e-indica ed seasonal end in N2O exchange. Soil mois u e le els we e op imal and he daily p ecipi a ion was well dis ibu ed du ing Figu e 1. Seasonal dis ibu ion o (A) daily a e aged N2O emissions (mg m−2 d−1) as measu ed by 4 di e en lase based gas analyse s (ARC – con inuous wa e lase spec ome e , Ae odyne Resea ch Inc., Bille ica, MA, USA; TGA – ace gas analyse , Campbell Scien i ic Inc., Logan, UT, USA; LGR - con inuous wa e lase spec ome e , Los Ga os Resea ch Inc., Moun ain View, CA, USA; ARP – pulsed quan um cascade lase spec ome e , Ae odyne Resea ch Inc., Bille ica, MA, USA) (B) daily a e aged olume ic soil mois u e con en (m3 m−3) measu ed a 2.5 cm below he soil su ace and daily sum o p ecipi a ion (mm) and (C) daily sums o g oss ecosys em p oduc i i y (GEP, g C m−2 d−1) du ing he N2O ins umen in e -compa ison o ganised du ing Ap il – No embe 2011 a a mine al soil si e a Maaninka in eas e n Finland. The si e was cul i a ed wi h eed cana y g ass (RCG, Phala is a undinaceae, L.), a pe ennial bioene gy c op. www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/ 3 Scien i ic RepoR s | 6:25739 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep25739 he ea ly pa o he g owing season (Fig.1B). This esul ed in a sha p inc ease in he c op g ow h ( ep esen ed in Fig.1C as g oss ecosys em p oduc i i y, GEP) wi h GEP eaching i s peak abou h ee weeks ollowing he e ilize applica ion and he la ges N2O elease o he a mosphe e du ing he season. As he EC me hod o e s unique possibili ies o insigh s in o N2O luxes a high empo al esolu ion6, we ocused he e pa icula ly on diu nal a ia ion in N2O lux as measu ed by one o he analyze s (conside ed o be he bes pe o ming N2O analyze in an in e -compa ison s udy)18. Du ing he high lux pe iod shown in Fig.2A, N2O emissions exhibi ed a diu nal a ia ion, wi h he highes luxes obse ed du ing he day ime and he lowes a nigh ime on h ee consecu i e days. All analyze s ope a ional du ing his ime exhibi ed a simila pa e n. The day ime emissions we e 2.7–4.2 imes highe han hose measu ed du ing nigh (Fig.2A). A mean diu nal pa e n o he en i e high- lux pe iod (n = 16) is shown in Fig.2B. The subsequen , much longe low lux pe iod (day 161– day 273) e ealed some peculia i ies in he empo al N2O dynamics. A close look a he diu nal pa - e n o N2O emissions du ing his N de icien low lux pe iod indica ed ha N2O emissions we e, on an a e age, abou 50% highe du ing nigh han du ing he day (Fig.3A). This is in con as o he diu nal end obse ed du ing he high- lux pe iod (Fig.2B). Impo an ly, all analyze s ope a ional du ing he ime we e consis en in eco ding such a phenomenon. The seasonal (Ap il – No embe 2011) sum o N2O emissions amoun ed o 2.8 kg N2O ha−1 wi h emissions om he sho high lux pe iod accoun ing o abou 55% o he seasonal sum. As discussed abo e, he diu nal N2O exchange du ing and ou side he high lux pe iod we e in con as . To al emissions om he high lux pe iod calcula ed only om day ime measu ed luxes (and he eby neglec ing he diu nal a ia ions) we e 23% highe compa ed o he sum calcula ed by conside ing he diu nal pa e n. In con as o his o e es ima ion, he o al emissions du ing N de icien condi ions we e 16% lowe compa ed o he sum ob ained by accoun ing o he comple e diu nal pa e n o N2O exchange. We ca ied ou an independen p ocess s udy; a 15N labelling (15NH415NO3) ield campaign du ing mid-July in 2011 ( he low- lux pe iod) on plo s cul i a ed wi h a mix u e o imo hy (Phleum p a ense L.) and meadow escue (Fes uca p a ensis Huds.) and loca ed a he same s udy si e. Repea ed measu emen s o 15N a om % abundance o accumula ed N2O in he headspace o opaque and anspa en chambe s (simula ing nigh and day- ime condi- ions) we e consis en ly and signi ican ly di e en . While he 15N a om % alues o N2O om anspa en cham- be s emained abou cons an du ing he chambe closu e pe iod, hose om he opaque chambe s inc eased linea ly o e he 35 minu es o chambe closu e (Fig.4). The slope o he build-up o he hea ie iso ope (15N) in he da k chambe headspace was an o de o magni ude highe (0.001 a om % min−1) compa ed o ha in he anspa en chambe headspace (0.0001 a om % min−1). In e es ial ecosys ems, N2O is p oduced ia a wide ange o mic obiological N cycling p ocesses such as chemoli ho ophic NH4 + oxida ion19, deni i ica ion20,21, ni i ie deni i ica ion22, codeni i ica ion23, dissimi- la o y ni a e educ ion (DNRA)24, he e o ophic ni i ica ion25,26, chemodeni i ica ion and abio ic decompo- si ion o ammonium ni a e27. The ac o s ha egula e N cycling p ocesses o deni i ica ion and ni i ica ion in soils ha e been ca ego ized as p oximal and dis al con ols28. Fo deni i ying mic obes he key p oximal ac- o s di ec ly con olling he ac i i y a e O2 concen a ion, soil NO3− and C a ailabili y and empe a u e29,30. Fo Figu e 2. E olu ion o 30-minu e alues o (A) N2O exchange in μ g m−2 h −1 ( ed solid ci cles, he downwa d a ow indica es he day o e iliza ion wi h ammonium ni a e), (B) mean diu nal lux pa e n du ing he high lux pe iod ( ed solid ci cles; he black line is a endline i ed o he mean diu nal lux da a in μ g m−2 h −1 wi h he quad a ic leas squa es i ). Measu emen s we e made a a mine al soil si e loca ed in Maaninka in eas e n Finland du ing Ap il – No embe 2011. The si e was cul i a ed wi h eed cana y g ass (RCG, Phala is a undinaceae, L.), a pe ennial bioene gy c op. www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/ 4 Scien i ic RepoR s | 6:25739 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep25739 ni i ica ion, a ailabili y o O2 and NH4 + and empe a u e a e impo an p oximal con ols31. Dis al ac o s such as plan g ow h, managemen p ac ices, soil ex u e and wa e a ailabili y, egula e indi ec ly deni i ica ion/ ni i ica ion ac i i ies by a ec ing he p oximal con olling ac o s28–30. We obse ed he la ges N2O emissions a he s udy si e immedia ely a e he applica ion o an ino ganic N e ilize (Fig.1A). Du ing his high emission pe iod wi h he day ime peaks in N2O emissions, a ailabili y o mine al N (NH4 + and NO3−) was high (Supplemen a y Fig. S2). I is no ewo hy a his junc u e ha he pe - ennial bioene gy c op (RCG) om he p e ious season was le on he si e o o e win e . RCG possesses a la ge amoun o nons uc u al ca bohyd a e (NSC) ese es in i s oo s as a coping mechanism o o e come he ha sh o e win e ing en i onmen . The concen a ion o NSCs in he RCG oo s has been epo ed o be abou h ee imes highe han ha in he abo eg ound plan pa s32. The si e was e ilized wi hin a mon h a e he c op om he p e ious season was ha es ed. We ing e en s and he p esence o RCG li e le o e on he soil su ace a e c op ha es ing as well as high ac i i y o RCG oo s may ha e aided he de elopmen o anae obic mic osi es in he su ace laye s33. Lack o oxygen (Suppo ing Fig.2), high soil SOC and high a ailabili y o soil N may ha e igge ed enhanced a es o N2O p oduc ion h ough deni i ica ion. Figu e 3. Mean (day 206– day 280) diu nal pa e n o (A) N2O exchange in μ g m−2 h −1 ( ed solid ci cles) and pho osyn he ically ac i e adia ion (PAR in μ mol m−2 s−1, blue solid ci cles whe e solid black lines ep esen a e age N2O emission a es du ing di e en pe iods o he day, ligh g ey lines abo e and below he black line ep esen he con idence band wi h ± 1 s anda d e o o he mean), (B) g oss ecosys em p oduc i i y (GEP, mg CO2 m−2 h −1, g een solid ci cles) du ing he low lux pe iod (day 206–280) in 2011 g owing season a a mine al soil si e in Maaninka in eas e n Finland cul i a ed wi h a pe ennial c op, (C) Low lux pe iod N2O emissions (μ g N2O m−2 h −1) i ed as a linea unc ion o he concu en ly measu ed g oss ecosys em p oduc i i y (mg CO2 m−2 h −1). The solid line ep esen s he linea leas squa es i o he da a, alues o he slope, in e cep , and he coe icien o de e mina ion esul ing om his i a e shown in he panel. www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/ 5 Scien i ic RepoR s | 6:25739 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep25739 Unde condi ions o high mine al N a ailabili y, he a ia ion in empe a u e likely was among he key ac o o he diu nal a ia ion in he mic obial ac i i ies associa ed wi h N2O emissions. Diu nal a iabili y wi h a day ime peak in N2O luxes was epo ed o he i s ime in he la e 1970s34,35. The i s s udy36 ha speci ically examined easons o he diu nal a iabili y a ibu ed 90% o he obse ed diu nal a ia ion o changes in soil empe a u e and associa ed changes in N2O solubili y. Ano he s udy37 conside s ha he ole o he plan pho- osyn he ic ac i i y in he N2O lux diu nal a iabili y is caused by supplying C o soil mic oo ganisms, ia oo exuda ion, since days wi h la ge diu nal a iabili y in N2O luxes had high adia ion. This could lead also o lowe oxygen con en in he soil su ace du ing he day ime. Such a day-nigh pa e n in oxygen con en was no iced a ou s udy si e (Supplemen a y Fig. 2). A s udy conduc ed in 201038 obse ed diu nal a ia ion in N2O lux du ing a b ie pe iod o high N2O lux ollowing he cul i a ion o a na i e empe a e g assland soil. Based on iso opologue da a, he a o emen ioned s udy epo ed an inc ease in N2O de i ed om bac e ial deni i ica ion om mo ning o a e noon hou s. As indica ed abo e, he high lux pe iod ollowing he e ilize applica ion las ed abou 15 days. The ea e , he soil mine al N s a us was consis en ly low (Supplemen a y Fig. S2), while he RCG c op was ac i ely pho o- syn hesizing (Fig.3B). Once he e ec o he applied N subsides, soils gene ally emi N2O a small a es, o en desc ibed as he ‘backg ound’ emissions. Du ing his ‘backg ound’ emission phase las ing un il he end o he plan pho osyn he ic ac i i y, a diu nal pa e n wi h lowe day ime ne emissions compa ed o hose du ing he nigh ime was consis en ly e iden (Fig.3A). Such obse a ions wi h low ne emissions o e en ne soil N2O up ake du ing day ime ha e been epo ed p e iously39,40. Howe e , his is one o he ew s udies ha epo such con inuous eco ds o his phenomenon wi h such high p ecision in a pe ennial g assland ecosys em unde No dic condi ions. A numbe o s udies ha e epo ed a sha p inc ease in N2O concen a ion wi h dep h25,41. In hese s udies, N2O concen a ions ha e been as high as 20–30 imes he ambien concen a ion in he a mosphe e a he deepes subsoil sampling poin s, sugges ing N2O p oduc ion a e in subsoil is su icien o main ain a s eep N2O concen- a ion g adien h ough he soil p o ile. Based on he soil mois u e con en , O2 concen a ion and WFPS pa e ns a ou si e, i is in ui i e o assume ha he e is a con inuous N2O p oduc ion deepe in he soil p o ile h oughou he g owing season. Howe e , based on he da a we ha e, i is no clea how his deep N2O could con ibu e o he con as ing diu nal a ia ion in he N2O emissions wi hin he g owing season, since he diu nal a ia ions in all en i onmen al a iables such as soil oxygen and wa e con en , empe a u e, especially a deepe laye s, a e small (Supplemen a y Fig. 2). Du ing ac i e pho osyn hesis, plan oo s discha ge eadily a ailable C42. The oo exuda ion p ocess is epo ed o ollow diu nal hy hms, wi h exuda ion inc easing du ing ligh pe iods43. Such obse a ions sugges ha he ans e o C compounds om assimila ing lea es o oo s and soil mic obes occu s as , wi hin hou s, as has been shown o RCG by using 13CO2 pulse-chase labeling44, demons a ing he igh coupling o soil mic obial ac i i y o plan pho osyn hesis45. This ex a ca bon s imula es he ac i i y o he e o ophic mic obes and immo- biliza ion o ino ganic N. Addi ionally, soil a ailable N is aken up by he plan s du ing day ime46. This leads o a sho age o + NH4 ha limi s he ac i i y o ammonium oxidizing mic obes and hei N2O p oduc ion. Wi h mo e ca bon a ailable o he deni i ie s, enhanced a es o N2O educ ion o N2 a e suppo ed unde poo N a aila- bili y and lowe oxygen con en in he soil p o ile owing o inc eased he e o ophic and au o ophic espi a ion47. The e o e, i is logical o hink ha he amoun o N2O ha di uses om he deepe laye s du ing day ime is likely o be consumed by deni i ie s mo e e icien ly hus lowe ing he o e all N2O emissions. The ela i ely highe educ ion o N2O o N2 may help explain he nega i e ela ionship be ween he g oss ecosys em p oduc i i y and ne N2O emissions (Fig.3C). Figu e 4. Measu emen s o a om % abundance ollowing he addi ion o labelled 15N e ilize o imo hy and meadow escue g ass plo s loca ed on a mine al si e cul i a ed wi h a pe ennial bioene gy c op in eas e n Finland. The blue do s ep esen measu emen s made wi h a anspa en chambe and he ed do s wi h a da k chambe . www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/ 6 Scien i ic RepoR s | 6:25739 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep25739 The soil oxygen concen a ions in he su ace laye s exhibi ed diu nal a ia ions in he su ace laye s (0–20 cm dep hs) du ing May h ough Augus (Supplemen a y Fig. 2). This is he pe iod when he plan s a e pho osyn he i- cally mos ac i e. The a ia ions we e dampened du ing he mon h o Sep embe when he plan s we e unde go- ing senescence. Addi ionally, he e we e no consis en diu nal a ia ions in oxygen concen a ions deepe in he soil laye (80–100 cm) sugges ing ha hese deepe laye s a e decoupled wi h espec o he plan oo ac i i y in he uppe laye s. Ou assump ion ha he plan s ha e a ole o play in C and N dynamics inds addi ional suppo in he esul s om an independen 15N labelling campaign (Fig.4), men ioned abo e. A e adding labelled e i- lize o he soil, he label was acked in N2O o a g ea e ex en unde da k han unde ligh condi ions. While he ecosys em scale EC measu emen s ep esen ed N2O emissions om RCG, a pe ennial g ass species wi h ae en- chyma ous issue, he plo scale iso opic analyses we e pe o med on imo hy and meadow escue, pe ennial g ass species wi h no such issue. These common obse a ions om his s udy highligh ing ligh -dependen plan and soil mic obial in e ac ions om s uc u ally di e en plan species sugges ha he N dynamics pe haps ollow a simila pa e n unde N de iciency ac oss ege a ion ypes in his ecosys em. Mos o he pas s udies on N cycling in ag icul u al soils ha e ocused hei a en ion p ima ily on plan a ail- able N in soluble ino ganic (NO3−, NH4 + , NO2−) o m. Recen ly, howe e , he hough ha plan s may ely on o ganic N sou ces when he e ec o he added N e ilize subsides is gaining impo ance48. In iew o his, he o iginal hole in he pipe model wi h only wo N sou ces is now sugges ed o be modi ied o include o ganic N as an addi ional N sou ce in he pipe49. The pool o soluble o ganic N, especially ee amino acids, has been obse ed in soils a concen a ions compa able o o g ea e han ha o ino ganic N50. Soil o ganic ma e u no e , plan , and mic obial N up ake p ocesses ope a e apidly and a a ying a es, causing soil amino acid composi ion o be highly dynamic in space and ime51. A s udy on soil N lux dynamics in e ilized and un e ilized bo eal o es soils has shown ha soil amino acids can a y o e sho , diu nal imescales52. In iew o such obse a ions, i is possible ha he dynamic na u e o soil o ganic N plays a ole in he diu nal egula ion o N2O emissions om ou s udy si e, especially unde condi ions o low soil N a ailabili y. Howe e , e ec s o en i onmen al change on soil amino acid concen a ions and composi ion and hei ole in soil N ans o ma ions a e no ye well unde s ood. Whe e does he N2O emi ed du ing he high and low lux pe iods o igina e om ? Wha a e he dominan p ocesses ha accoun o he con as ing diu nal pa e ns o N2O emissions ? These ob ious ques ions need u - he s udies on soil physical, chemical and biological p ope ies and plan -mic obial p ocesses. Ou obse a ions highligh ha he accu a e ne N2O exchange ac oss he soil–a mosphe e in e ace, signi ican ly imp o ed by mode n analy ical me hods such as he con inuous wa e lase spec oscopy, can now be measu ed o e eal con- as ing sho - e m exchange pa e ns unde high and low soil N a ailabili y. Such s udies need o be ideally com- bined wi h smalle scale p ocess s udies on a highe spa ial and empo al esolu ion o elucida e he soil p ocesses and d i e s o simul aneous N2O p oduc ion, consump ion and anspo wi hin he hizosphe e. In iew o he dynamic sho - e m a ia ions in N2O emissions, con inuous au oma ed chambe - and eddy co a iance-based lux measu emen s a e necessa y o a be e unde s anding o he in ima e, empo al coupling be ween plan s and soil mic obial communi ies and hei esou ce demands in e es ial ecosys ems. Me hods The s udy si e. The eddy co a iance measu emen s o N2O exchange we e made on an ag icul u al ield si e, 6.3 ha in a ea. The si e is loca ed in he u al dis ic o Maaninka, Eas e n Finland (63° 9′ 48.69″ N, 27° 14′ 3.29″ E). Long- e m ( e e ence pe iod 1981–2010) annual ai empe a u e in he egion is 3.2 °C and he annual p ecipi a ion is 612 mm53. The soil ype a ied be ween loam and clay loam. The ield was sown in June 2009 wi h a pe ennial bioene gy c op, eed cana y g ass (RCG, Phala is a undinaceae, L. c . Pala on). A e he i s yea o c op es ablishmen , he si e was e ilized a he s a o e e y g owing season (la e May) wi h an N-P-K-S e ilize con aining 76 kg N ha−1 (NO3-N : NH4-N = 47:53). The canopy heigh de eloped h oughou he 2011 g owing season om abou 10 cm in mid-May o 1.7 m by la e June wi h a slowe inc ease o a maximum heigh o 1.9 m by ea ly July (see Supplemen a y In o ma ion o u he de ails abou he si e). Eddy co a iance (EC) measu emen s o N2O and CO2 exchange. The EC measu emen s we e made as a pa o he ICOS (In eg a ed Ca bon Obse a ion Sys em) Finland p og am du ing Ap il o No embe 201118. The main objec i e behind hese measu emen s was o measu e accu a ely he ni ous oxide exchange om an ag icul u al si e and o compa e he pe o mance o ou di e en lase -based comme cial gas analyz- e s. The EC sys em consis ed o ou di e en N2O gas analyze s: ARC – con inuous wa e lase spec ome e , Ae odyne Resea ch Inc., Bille ica, MA, USA; TGA – ace gas analyse , Campbell Scien i ic Inc., Logan, UT, USA; con inuous wa e lase spec ome e , Los Ga os Resea ch Inc., Moun ain View, CA, USA; ARP – pulsed quan um cascade lase spec ome e , Ae odyne Resea ch Inc., Bille ica, MA, USA (see Supplemen a y In o ma ion o de ails). While TGA is a legacy ace gas analyse , ARP ep esen s he in e media e le el and ARC and LGR ep- esen he highes le els o ad ancemen wi h espec o hei abili y o de ec N2O signals a a p ecision necessa y o EC measu emen s. Ca e ul calib a ion and co ec ions we e pe o med in o de o mee he objec i es o he campaign. In addi ion, wo sonic anemome e s (RS-50, Gill Solen L d., UK and USA-1, Me ek Ge many GMBH) o measu ing u bulen wind componen s, an in a ed gas analyse (LI7000/LI6262 – Li-Co Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) o de ec ing high equency CO2 and wa e apou concen a ions we e used in he s udy. A wea he s a- ion loca ed a he si e moni o ed con inuously se e al mic ome eo ological obse a ions such as ai empe a u e and humidi y, a mosphe ic p essu e, wind speed and di ec ion, adia ion balance componen s, pho osyn he i- cally ac i e adia ion (PAR), p o iles o soil empe a u e and mois u e e c. G ea e de ails on EC da a acquisi- ion, adop ed da a p ocessing p ocedu es, applied lux co ec ions and ins umen de ails a e desc ibed in he Supplemen a y In o ma ion. www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/ 7 Scien i ic RepoR s | 6:25739 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep25739 Iso opic analyses o 15N. Chambe echnique based ni ous oxide luxes we e measu ed on 8 July 2011 om p e-ins alled aluminium colla s (0.36 m−2 basal a ea) wi h anspa en chambe and opaque chambe (wi h a chambe heigh o 0.33 m and 0.15 m, espec i ely) om 3 plo s (9 m2 each). The plo s we e es ablished in June 2009 wi h a o age g ass mix u e consis ing o imo hy (Phleum p a ense L. ,c . Tuukka), and meadow escue (Fes uca p a ensis Huds., c An i). G ass ield had been ha es ed wo weeks ea lie (on 22 June 2011) and a second e ilize dose o 15N-en iched Ammonium Ni a e (15NH415NO3, 10 AT-% (a om pe cen abundance) in bo h N o ms a a a e o 100 kg N ha−1) was applied a day p io o he chambe lux measu emen s. The objec i e o his ield campaign was o es ima e he ac ion o N2O de i ed om he 15N-en iched N- e ilize . Each N2O lux measu emen las ed 35 min. Gas samples o AT-% o 15N-N2O analysis we e collec ed a 5, 10, 15, 25 and 35 min in e als om he chambe headspace. Gas samples we e aken wi h a 160 ml sy inge om which he sample was immedia ely injec ed in o a p e-e acua ed 120 ml ials. Fo anspa en chambe measu emen s, as he g ass species ixed CO2 om he chambe head space unde ligh , concen a ion inside he chambe was moni o ed con inuously wi h an in a ed gas analyse (LI6400, Li-Co Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) o e he 35 min chambe deploymen du a ion. CO2 le els inside he anspa en chambe we e con inuously adjus ed du ing his pe iod by adding CO2 gas in o he chambe ai om a s anda d CO2 gas bo le so ha he CO2 con- cen a ion wi hin he chambe emained close o he ambien le el o e he measu emen pe iod. Addi ionally, a cooling uni was used in he anspa en chambe measu emen o keep he chambe ai empe a u e close o he ou side ai empe a u e. Du ing he opaque chambe measu emen , howe e , no chambe ai cooling o CO2 le el adjus men was done. The 35 min a e age empe a u es om anspa en and da k chambe headspaces a ied wi hin 5 °C. The collec ed gas samples we e analysed o he AT -% 15N-N2O wi h an iso ope a io mass spec ome- e (IRMS; The mo Finnigan Del a V plus wi h ConFlo IV, The mo Fishe Scien i ic) coupled o a ace-gas p e-concen a ion uni (P eCon, The mo Fishe Scien i ic) and a gas ch oma og aph. Wa e and CO2 gas we e emo ed om he sample gas by a chemical ap (con aining NaOH o CO2 and Mg(ClO4)2 o H2O). Re e ences 1. Myh e, G. e al. An h opogenic and Na u al Radia i e Fo cing. Chap e 8 (Camb idge, Uni ed Kingdom and New Yo k, NY, USA, 2013). 2. Reay, D. S. e al. Global ag icul u e and ni ous oxide emissions. Na . Clim. Change 2, 410–416 (2012). 3. Ciais, P. e al. Ca bon and O he Biogeochemical Cycles. Chap e 6 (Camb idge Uni e si y P ess, Camb idge, Uni ed Kingdom and New Yo k, NY, USA, 2013). 4. Saikawa, E. e al. Global and egional emissions es ima es o N2O. A mos. Chem. Phys. 14, 4617–4641, doi: 10.5194/acp-14-4617- 2014 (2014). 5. Came on, K. C., Di, H. J. & Moi , J. L. Ni ogen losses om he soil/plan sys em: a e iew. Ann. App. Biol. 162, 145–173, doi: 10.1111/aab.12014 (2013). 6. Rees, R. M. e al. Ni ous oxide emissions om Eu opean ag icul u e - an analysis o a iabili y and d i e s o emissions om ield expe imen s. Biogeosciences 10, 2671–2682, doi: 10.5194/bg-10-2671-2013 (2013). 7. Bouwman, A. F., Boumans, L. J. M. & Ba jes, N. H. Emissions o N2O and NO om e ilized ields: Summa y o a ailable measu emen da a. Glob. Biogeochem. Cy. 16, 6-1–6-13, doi: 10.1029/2001gb001811 (2002). 8. Chadwick, D. R. e al. Op imizing chambe me hods o measu ing ni ous oxide emissions om plo -based ag icul u al expe imen s. Eu . J. Soil Sci. 65, 295–307, doi: 10.1111/ejss.12117 (2014). 9. Ku zbach, L. e al. CO2 lux de e mina ion by closed-chambe me hods can be se iously biased by inapp op ia e applica ion o linea eg ession. Biogeosciences 4, 1005–1025, doi: 10.5194/bg-4-1005-2007 (2007). 10. Maljanen, M. e al. A o es a ion does no necessa ily educe ni ous oxide emissions om managed bo eal pea soils. Biogeochemis y 108, 199–218, doi: 10.1007/s10533-011-9591-1 (2012). 11. Li ings on, G. & Hu chinson, G. Enclosu e-based measu emen o ace gas exchange: applica ions and sou ces o e o . In Biogenic ace gases: measu ing emissions om soil and wa e (eds P. A. Ma son & R. C. Ha is) 14–51 (Blackwell Sci., Malden, Mass., 1995). 12. Pa ey, E. e al. Towa ds s anda ds o measu ing g eenhouse gas luxes om ag icul u al ields using ins umen ed owe s. Can. J. Soil Sci. 86, 373–400, doi: 10.4141/S05-100 (2006). 13. Baldocchi, D. Measu ing luxes o ace gases and ene gy be ween ecosys ems and he a mosphe e – he s a e and u u e o he eddy co a iance me hod. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 3600–3609, doi: 10.1111/gcb.12649 (2014). 14. Nicolini, G., Cas aldi, S., F a ini, G. & Valen ini, R. A li e a u e o e iew o mic ome eo ological CH4 and N2O lux measu emen s in e es ial ecosys ems. A mos. En i on. 81, 311–319, doi: 10.1016/j.a mosen .2013.09.030 (2013). 15. Pihla ie, M. K. e al. Compa ison o s a ic chambe s o measu e CH4 emissions om soils. Ag . Fo es Me eo ol. 171–172, 124–136, doi: 10.1016/j.ag o me .2012.11.008 (2013). 16. Sa age, K., Phillips, R. & Da idson, E. High empo al equency measu emen s o g eenhouse gas emissions om soils. Biogeosciences 11, 2709–2720, doi: 10.5194/bg-11-2709-2014 (2014). 17. We le, P. Accu acy and p ecision o lase spec ome e s o ace gas sensing in he p esence o op ical inges and a mosphe ic u bulence. App. Phy. B 102, 313–329 (2011). 18. Rannik, Ü. e al. In e compa ison o as esponse comme cial gas analyse s o ni ous oxide lux measu emen s unde ield condi ions. Biogeosciences 12, 415–432, doi: 10.5194/bg-12-415-2015 (2015). 19. Bu e bach-Bahl, K., Baggs, E. M., Dannenmann, M., Kiese, R. & Zechmeis e -Bol ens e n, S. Ni ous oxide emissions om soils: how well do we unde s and he p ocesses and hei con ols ? Philos. T ans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 368, 20130122, doi: 10.1098/ s b.2013.0122 (2013). 20. W age, N., G oenigen, J. W. ., Oenema, O. & Baggs, E. M. A no el dual-iso ope labelling me hod o dis inguishing be ween soil sou ces o N2O. Rapid Commun. Mass Sp. 19, 3298–3306, doi: 10.1002/ cm.2191 (2005). 21. B ake , G. & Con ad, R. Di e si y, s uc u e, and size o N(2)O-p oducing mic obial communi ies in soils–wha ma e s o hei unc ioning? Ad . Appl. Mic obiol. 75, 33–70, doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-387046-9.00002-5 (2011). 22. Philippo , L. e al. Mapping ield-scale spa ial pa e ns o size and ac i i y o he deni i ie communi y. En i on. Mic obiol. 11, 1518–1526, doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01879.x (2009). 23. Kool, D. M. e al. Ni i ie deni i ica ion can be a sou ce o N2O om soil: a e ised app oach o he dual-iso ope labelling me hod. Eu . J. Soil Sci. 61, 759–772, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01270.x (2010). 24. Spo , O., Russow, R. & S ange, C. F. Fo ma ion o hyb id N2O and hyb id N2 due o codeni i ica ion: Fi s e iew o a ba ely conside ed p ocess o mic obially media ed N-ni osa ion. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 1995–2011, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.06.014 (2011). 25. Laughlin, R. J. & S e ens, R. J. E idence o Fungal Dominance o Deni i ica ion and Codeni i ica ion in a G assland. Soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66, 1540–1548, doi: 10.2136/sssaj2002.1540 (2002). www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/ 8 Scien i ic RepoR s | 6:25739 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep25739 26. Mülle , C., Laughlin, R. J., Spo , O. & Rü ing, T. Quan i ica ion o N2O emission pa hways ia a 15N acing model. Soil Biol. Biochem. 72, 44–54, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.01.013 (2014). 27. S ange, C. F. e al. Use o he in e se abundance app oach o iden i y he sou ces o NO and N2O elease om Spanish o es soils unde oxic and hypoxic condi ions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 57, 451–458, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.10.006 (2013). 28. Cleempu , O. & Sama e , A. H. Ni i e in soils: accumula ion and ole in he o ma ion o gaseous N compounds. Fe . Res. 45, 81–89, doi: 10.1007/b 00749884 (1995). 29. Wallens ein, M. D., My old, D. D., Fi es one, M. & Voy ek, M. En i onmen al con ols on deni i ying communi ies and deni i ica ion a es: Insigh s om molecula me hods. Ecol. Appl. 16, 2143–2152, doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2143:ECODCA]2.0.CO;2 (2006). 30. Tiedje, J. M. Ecology o deni i ica ion and dissimila o y ni a e educ ion o ammonium. In En i onmen al Mic obiology (ed A. J. B. Zehnde ) 179–244 (John Wiley and Sons, New Yo k, 1988). 31. Mosie , A. R., Mo gan, J. A., King, J. Y., LeCain, D. & Milchunas, D. G. Soil-a mosphe e exchange o CH4, CO2, NOx, and N2O in he Colo ado sho g ass s eppe unde ele a ed CO2. Plan Soil 240, 201–211, doi: 10.1023/A:1015783801324 (2002). 32. Kowalchuk, G. A. & S ephen, J. R. Ammonia-oxidizing bac e ia: a model o molecula mic obial ecology. Annu. Re . Mic obiol. 55, 485–529, doi: 10.1146/annu e .mic o.55.1.485 (2001). 33. Tamu a, Y. & Mo iyama, M. Nons uc u al Ca bohyd a e Rese es in Roo s and he Abili y o Tempe a e Pe ennial G asses o O e win e in Ea ly G ow h S ages. Plan P od. Sci. 4, 56–61, doi: 10.1626/pps.4.56 (2001). 34. Kusel, K. & D ake, H. L. Anae obic capaci ies o lea li e . Appl. En i on. Mic ob. 62, 4216–4219 (1996). 35. Denmead, O., T., J.R., F. & J.R., S. S udies o ni ous oxide emission om a g ass swa d. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43, 726–728 (1979). 36. Ryden, J. C., Lund, L. J. & Foch , D. D. Di ec in- ield measu emen o ni ous oxide lux om soils. Soil Sci. So.c Am. J. 42, 731–737 (1978). 37. Blackme , A. M., Robbins, S. G. & B emne , J. M. Diu nal a iabili y in a e o emission o ni ous oxide om soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46, 937–942 (1982). 38. Ch is ensen, S. Ni ous oxide emission om he soil su ace: Con inuous measu emen by gas ch oma og aphy. Soil Biol. Biochem. 15, 481–483, doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(83)90015-9 (1983). 39. Os om, N. E. e al. Iso opologue da a e eal bac e ial deni i ica ion as he p ima y sou ce o N2O du ing a high lux e en ollowing cul i a ion o a na i e empe a e g assland. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 499–506, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.12.003 (2010). 40. Ne el, A. e al. Expe imen al assessmen o N2O backg ound luxes in g assland sys ems. Tellus B 59, 470–482, doi: 10.1111/j.1600- 0889.2007.00273.x (2007). 41. Zona, D. e al. N2O luxes o a bio-ene gy popla plan a ion du ing a wo yea s o a ion pe iod. Glob. Change Biol. Bioene gy 5, 536–547, doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12019 (2013). 42. G oenigen, J. W. . e al. Subsoil 15N-N2O concen a ions in a sandy soil p o ile a e applica ion o 15N- e ilize . Nu . Cycl. Ag oecosys. 72, 13–25 (2005). 43. Mu ay, P. J. e al. Deni i ica ion po en ial in a g assland subsoil: e ec o ca bon subs a es. Soil Biol. Biochem. 36, 545–547, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.10.020 (2004). 44. Hughes, M., Donnelly, C., C ozie , A. & Wheele , C. T. E ec s o he exposu e o oo s o Alnus glu inosa o ligh on la onoids and nodula ion. Can. J. Bo . 77, 1311–1315, doi: 10.1139/b99-077 (1999). 45. Ta i, N. M. e al. Linking mic obial communi y s uc u e and alloca ion o plan -de i ed ca bon in an o ganic ag icul u al soil using 13CO2 pulse-chase labelling combined wi h 13C-PLFA p o iling. Soil Biol. Biochem. 58, 207–215, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.013 (2013). 46. Dene , K. e al. Communi y shi s and ca bon ansloca ion wi hin me abolically-ac i e hizosphe e mic oo ganisms in g asslands unde ele a ed CO2. Biogeosciences 4, 769–779, doi: 10.5194/bg-4-769-2007 (2007). 47. Macdu , J. H. & Bakken, A. K. Diu nal a ia ion in up ake and xylem con en s o ino ganic and assimila ed N unde con inuous and in e up ed N supply o Phleum p a ense and Fes uca p a ensis. J. Exp. Bo . 54, 431–444 (2003). 48. Del G osso, S. J. e al. Gene al model o N2O and N2 gas emissions om soils due o den i ica ion. Glob. Biogeochem. Cy. 14, 1045–1060, doi: 10.1029/1999GB001225 (2000). 49. Inselsbache , E. e al. Sho - e m compe i ion be ween c op plan s and soil mic obes o ino ganic N e ilize . Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 360–372, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.019 (2010). 50. Zhang, J., Mülle , C. & Cai, Z. He e o ophic ni i ica ion o o ganic N and i s con ibu ion o ni ous oxide emissions in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 84, 199–209, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.028 (2015). 51. Inselsbache , E. & Näsholm, T. A no el me hod o measu e he e ec o empe a u e on di usion o plan -a ailable ni ogen in soil. Plan Soil 354, 251–257, doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-1061-y (2011). 52. We din-P is e e , N. R., Kielland, K. & Boone, R. D. Soil amino acid composi ion ac oss a bo eal o es successional sequence. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 1210–1220, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.001 (2009). 53. Inselsbache , E., Oyewole, O. A. & Näsholm, T. Ea ly season dynamics o soil ni ogen luxes in e ilized and un e ilized bo eal o es s. Soil Biol. Biochem. 74, 167–176, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.03.012 (2014). 54. Pi inen, P. e al. Tilas oja Suomen ilmas os a 1981–2010. (Finnish Me eo ological Ins i u e, Helsinki, Finland, Helsinki, Finland, 2012). Acknowledgemen s This wo k was suppo ed by he Academy o Finland (p ojec nos 118780, 127456, 1118615 and 263858). ICOS (271878), ICOSFinland (281255) and ICOS-ERIC (281250), DEFROST No dic Cen e o Excellence and InGOS EU a e g a e ully acknowledged o unding his wo k. This wo k was also suppo ed by ins i u ional esea ch unding (IUT20-11) o he Es onian Minis y o Educa ion and Resea ch. The UEF pa o he esea ch wo k was suppo ed by he unding om he UEF in as uc u e unding, Academy o Finland FidiP o p og amme (PIs – P o s Pe i Ma ikainen and Seppo Kellomäki) and he Minis y o Ag icul u e and Fo es y, Finland and MTT Ag i ood Resea ch Finland (MTT) s a egic unding (p ojec no. 21030028). Maa- ja esi ekniikan uki y and Jenny and An i Wihu i Founda ion a e hanked o esea ch unding g an ed o Simo Jokinen. Au ho Con ibu ions N.J.S., Ü.R., P.J.M., T.V. and M.P. concei ed he idea o he pape . Ü.R., I.M., O.P., N.J.S. and S.L. analysed he eddy co a iance da a o N2O and CO2 exchange om he s udy si e. S.H., S.L., N.J.S. and N.H. collec ed he ield expe imen al da a on N2O and CO2 exchange. The da a used in his analysis a e om he N2O lase spec ome e p o ided by M.Z. who ensu ed ha N2O analyse s (manu ac u ed by Ae odyne Resea ch Inc.) a e p ope ly ins alled in he ield and ha good quali y da ase s can be collec ed om hem. P.V. and M.R. we e esponsible o he si e main enance, c op husband y and es ablishmen o ield expe imen a ion o he iso opic analyses needed in he s udy. C.B. and S.J. we e esponsible o he iso opic analysis pa o he s udy. N.J.S., P.J.M. and C.B. w o e he pape and all au ho s commen ed on ea lie e sions o he manusc ip . www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/ 9 Scien i ic RepoR s | 6:25739 | DOI: 10.1038/s ep25739 Addi ional In o ma ion Supplemen a y in o ma ion accompanies his pape a h p://www.na u e.com/s ep Compe ing inancial in e es s: The au ho s decla e no compe ing inancial in e es s. How o ci e his a icle: Shu pali, N. J. e al. Neglec ing diu nal a ia ions leads o unce ain ies in e es ial ni ous oxide emissions. Sci. Rep. 6, 25739; doi: 10.1038/s ep25739 (2016). This wo k is licensed unde a C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 4.0 In e na ional License. The images o o he hi d pa y ma e ial in his a icle a e included in he a icle’s C ea i e Commons license, unless indica ed o he wise in he c edi line; i he ma e ial is no included unde he C ea i e Commons license, use s will need o ob ain pe mission om he license holde o ep oduce he ma e ial. To iew a copy o his license, isi h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/