The Role of Social Media Influencers in Public Health Communication : Case COVID-19 Pandemic

This is a self-archived version of an original article. This version may differ from the original in pagination and typographic details. Author(s): Title: Year: Version: Copyright: Rights: Rights url: Please cite the original version: CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ The Role of Social Media Influencers in Public Health Communication : Case COVID-19 Pandemic © 2022 the Authors Published version Pöyry, Essi; Reinikainen, Hanna; Luoma-Aho, Vilma Pöyry, E., Reinikainen, H., & Luoma-Aho, V. (2022). The Role of Social Media Influencers in Public Health Communication : Case COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 16(3), 469-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2022.2042694 2022 Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=hstc20 International Journal of Strategic Communication ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/hstc20 The Role of Social Media Influencers in Public Health Communication: Case COVID-19 Pandemic Essi Pöyry, Hanna Reinikainen & Vilma Luoma-Aho To cite this article: Essi Pöyry, Hanna Reinikainen & Vilma Luoma-Aho (2022) The Role of Social Media Influencers in Public Health Communication: Case COVID-19 Pandemic, International Journal of Strategic Communication, 16:3, 469-484, DOI: 10.1080/1553118X.2022.2042694 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2042694 © 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. Published online: 19 Jun 2022. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data The Role of Social Media Influencers in Public Health Communication: Case COVID-19 Pandemic Essi Pöyry a , Hanna Reinikainen b , and Vilma Luoma-Aho b a Centre for Consumer Society Research, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; b Jyväskylä University School of Business, Jyväskylä, Finland ABSTRACT During public health crises, public organizations face a variety of strategic communication challenges, and the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 is an extreme example. In Finland, the Prime Minister’s Office initiated a communication campaign that utilized social media influencers to communicate timely instructions regarding the pandemic. However, it is uncertain how social media influencers adapt to briefings of public organizations given that they typically work with brands that align with their own interests and expertise, which rarely is epidemiology. We use the two-step flow of communication model and social influence theory to analyze research data that consisted of 96 Instagram posts, 108 Instagram Stories and 1097 comments. Qualitative content analysis was used to see how the influencers communicated about the pandemic and how their followers reacted. The results suggest that the influencers tried to adapt the messages to their own style, and, instead of committing to the wordings of the campaign, they shared general guidelines and, with their own example, showed how to behave during the pandemic. Their participation in the campaign helped affect social norms during the time of the crisis, which in the case of public health communication is a substantial, strategic goal. Introduction In a time of crisis, Finland is calling in the cavalry: social media influencers. (Politico, 2020) This paper studies a strategic communication campaign to reach and inform citizens during the COVID-19 pandemic. Besides the unique context of a global pandemic, the campaign was unique also because it relied on social media influencers – thus far a rare feature in public communication campaigns (Bonnevie et al., 2020; Borchers & Enke, 2021). Finland was one of the first countries in the world to include social media influencers in the urgent COVID-19 communication, as part of a communication campaign initiated by the Prime Minister’s Office. The campaign titled Corona Facts encouraged and supported social media influencers in sharing reliable information about the coronavirus, combating the spread of misinformation, and reaching citizens who were outside the reach of legacy media and public organizations’ communication channels (Ping Helsinki, 2020; Reinikainen et al., in press). These efforts are perceived as strategic social media influencer communication – the utilization of social media influencers in strategic goal-attainment (Enke & Borchers, 2019). However, most social media influencers that authorities might hope to engage in public health communication campaigns are not experts in medicine, and their strategic influence is based on a number of interactive follower relationships and capability for content production and distribution CONTACT Essi Pöyry [email protected] Centre for Consumer Society Research, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION 2022, VOL. 16, NO. 3, 469–484 https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2042694 © 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (Enke & Borchers, 2019). Therefore, including social media influencers in strategic communication of urgent public health issues might be risky for organizations: public health-related posts most likely contrast with usual influencer content and undermine content coherence, a key factor of social media influencer effectiveness (Pöyry et al., 2019). As a result, the content does not necessarily create the wanted attention, engagement, and interaction. Building on strategic communication, media studies and social influence theory, we analyze the Corona Facts campaign using the two-step flow of communication model. The model explains how information flows from the mass media to opinion leaders and then to the general public (Lazarsfeld et al., 1948). Later research has questioned the model, particularly because social media allows refined targeting and personalized communication (Bennett & Manheim, 2006). While most research agrees that opinion leaders play a role in disseminating information in social media, research has largely focused on organically emerged opinion leaders with pre-existing interest and knowledge of the topic in question (Choi, 2015; Nisbet & Kotcher, 2009) – features that rarely describe social media influencers in the case of contagious diseases and epidemiology. We analyze whether the intended campaign messages go through unchanged or whether the influencers shape the content or add their own interpretation of it. Further, according to the social influence theory, we analyze whether the influencers follow the informational or normative route of persuasion. The theory posits that people’s decisions and behaviors are influenced by either information on the desired behavior or by observations on others’ behavior and the social norms attached (Kaplan & Miller, 1987; Wood, 2000). In computer-mediated communication, normative influence disappears if there is no group saliency (Perfumi et al., 2019) but social media influencers can pose normative influence over their followers. This allows us to understand the persuasion strategies the influencers used and how their followers reacted. Literature review Strategic social media influencer communication has developed into a prominent domain in strategic communication (Borchers & Enke, 2021). Many organizations have found that collaboration with social media influencers can advance their strategic goal attainment, as endorsements made by influencers have been found to increase favorable attitudes, intentions, and behaviors towards organizations (J. E. Lee & Watkins, 2016; Munnukka et al., 2019; Reinikainen et al., 2020; Sokolova & Kefi, 2020; Trivedi & Sama, 2020). From the point of view of strategic communication, social media influencers have been defined as “third-party actors that have established a significant number of relevant relationships with a specific quality to and influence on organizational stakeholders through content production, content distribution, interaction, and personal appearance on the social web” (Enke & Borchers, 2019, p. 267). This definition highlights the interactive and intimate relationships that social media influencers are able to tie with their followers in high numbers. Studies have found that follower engagement is an important factor contributing to the success of influencer endorsements (Munnukka et al., 2019; Reinikainen et al., 2020) and thus to the effectiveness of strategic social media influencer communication. Interestingly, existing academic literature on social media influencers’ role in public health communication concentrates mostly on the influencers’ potential harmful effect on their followers. For example, Jenkins et al. (2020, p. 11) argue that social media influencers “often promote damaging faddiets and share misinformation without consequence” and Leader et al. (2021) interview vaccinehesitant and vaccine-refusing social media influencer-mothers. While these studies generate important knowledge on how disinformation and otherwise harmful information spreads, it is worthwhile also to look at the opportunities that relate to influencers as identifiable opinion leaders and communicators of urgent and critical information. From organizations’ point of view, working together with these opinion leaders might be essential to attain their strategic communication goals. 470 E. PÖYRY ET AL. Information flows and the role of social media influencers A seminal communication theory, the two-step flow of communication model, highlights interpersonal relationships in the mediation of information in the society. The theory argues that, instead of getting information directly from the news (one step), most people are persuaded through the so-called opinion leaders, who mediate information from news outlets to their friends and family (two steps; Katz, 1957; Lazarsfeld et al., 1948). At the time of the introduction of the theory, opinion leaders were thought to be individuals who have relatively large circles of contacts, are influential in specific domains, and more exposed to formal mass communication than other group members (Katz, 1957). Personal beliefs and values were seen to affect what kind of information opinion leaders pass on, thus acting as gatekeepers between public organizations, corporations, news organizations, and the masses (Laughey, 2007). While some elements of the two-step flow of communication model are less pressing in the present time and age, such as people’s access to news and the mass media, there are other elements that make the theory still relevant. In the time of online news and social media, the role of various gatekeepers and opinion leaders is as critical as ever. For example, in the case of social media platforms, people are more likely to read online news that are liked and recommended by other people (Choi, 2016; Wang & Li, 2016). It has also been shown that the so-called weak ties (interpersonal relationships that connect dissimilar and distant networks of people) are key in disseminating information in the digital sphere (Bakshy et al., 2012), a phenomenon that is further affected by the logic of the algorithms (Soffer, 2019). Most social media channels were originally created for the purpose of connecting with friends, family and acquaintances. Later, the importance of organizational and non-personal connections on social media grew. In the current social media environment, one can subscribe to the content created by brands, media outlets, politicians, celebrities, and social media influencers, which inevitably decreases the relative visibility of personal, “real-world”, connections (Pöyry et al., 2019). Because of this phenomenon, Thorson and Wells (2016) propose the concept of curated flows to be an important feature in what kind of information gets consumed. According to this view, one’s personal communication network is affected by processes of curation by different actors, such as journalists, strategic communicators, social contacts, algorithmic filters, and the person herself. A social media influencer’s decision regarding the topic areas they post about represents the process of curation (Thorson & Wells, 2016). The existing categorization of the curated communication flows does not however account for the curation undertaken by social media influencers. Social media influencers are not journalists as they are not bound by similar ethical guidelines. They typically post about matters related to their personal life and are not expected to consider any wider perspective. Neither are they friends with all their followers, which means that social curation is different from the curation performed by the influencers. Finally, influencers might curate content based on financial or other interests, which makes it resemble strategic curation, but the goals of the influencers might heavily fluctuate over time, which is rarely the case of corporations or public organizations. “Influencer curation” is therefore an important and distinct process when considering the information that gets produced, circulated, and consumed today. Persuasive capabilities of social media influencers In principle, there are two types of opinion leaders: monomorphic, who employ expertise in one specific, narrow area, and polymorphic, who employ expertise in several, broader areas of knowledge (Merton, 1957). In practice, however, opinion leaders usually possess a mixture of monomorphic and polymorphic features, thus exerting both narrow and general expertise (Wang & Li, 2016). The same multifaceted nature of expertise can be seen to apply also to social media influencers; many social media influencers have a distinct brand and are profiled through a specific domain (Duffy & Hund, 2015). This does not mean that they only publish content in their domain, or that they would not have an effect on other domains or more general issues. Based on the theory of weak ties (Bakshy et al., 2012), it could be assumed that individuals who typically publish content on a certain domain (e.g., beauty), can have a disproportionately large effect on INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION 471 information dissemination and persuasion when they publish content on other domains (e.g., a public health crisis). Indeed, there are numerous examples of celebrities who have taken upon various social causes that go beyond what they were originally known for (Bennett, 2014; Williams, 2020), as well as private citizens who possess disproportionately large impact in their online social networks because they are active and influential in several different sub-networks (Choi, 2015; Nisbet & Kotcher, 2009). The persuasive capabilities of social media influencers rely on other factors than in the case of other types of communicators. Authenticity (Pöyry et al., 2019) and intimacy (Berryman & Kavka, 2017) are features that describe persuasive social media influencers and differentiate them from politicians, officials, and other formal authorities. Social media influencers are often perceived as peers to their followers, which differentiates them from traditional celebrities (Enke & Borchers, 2019). Nevertheless, influencers are often adored and admired in the same way as celebrities are. Thus, a certain kind of fan behavior can be discerned – followers sometimes support and defend their favourite social media influencers, pursue interaction with them, seek to conform to their endorsements and follow their advice (Berryman & Kavka, 2017; Marôpo et al., 2020). Research has shown that it is rather their emotional contagion (e.g., excitement, passion) and linguistic style that affect social media influencers’ ability to persuade than content or production expertise (M. T. Lee & Theokary, 2021). The relatively insignificant effect of influencer expertise on endorsement effectiveness has been also shown by other research (Kim & Kim, 2021; Lou & Yuan, 2019). A unique feature in what makes social media influencers persuasive is also their relationship with followers. Reinikainen et al. (2020) show that parasocial relationship – an imaginary relationship with media performers (Brown, 2015, p. 275) – affects influencer endorsement effectiveness. This suggests that persuasion of social media influencers is notably different from the traditional meritocratic formation of expertise and authority. Finally, an influencer’s ability to persuade his or her followers might follow the routes of social influence theory. Social influence refers to how people are influenced by the behavior of others to conform to community behavior patterns (Venkatesh & Brown, 2001). The theory suggests that there are two types of social influence: informational and normative. The former refers to information as a form of persuasion while the latter to persuasion based on observations on others’ behavior and the desire to maintain group harmony (Kaplan & Miller, 1987; Wood, 2000). Normative influence is thus based on perceptions about social norms. Online environments typically support informational persuasion because information can be so easily shared in a digital format, even anonymously. However, normative influence can take place in online environments if there is group saliency (Perfumi et al., 2019), that is, when people identify with a group that defines membership in terms of certain behavioral and attitudinal norms (Terry & Hogg, 1996; Wellen et al., 1998). Social media influencers could, therefore, utilize normative persuasion if their followers perceive to belong in the same social category with the influencer. This is a notable opportunity particularly when considering the format and style of most social media content – storydriven and emotion-laden images and videos (M. T. Lee & Theokary, 2021). Based on the reviewed literature and the particularities of the Corona Facts campaign, the research questions of this paper are: 1) How do social media influencers interpret the campaign’s suggestions for communicating about COVID-19 pandemic? 2) How do their followers react to the campaign messages? 3) How do influencers interact with their followers on the topic? Next, we describe how these questions are empirically scrutinized. Methodology The Corona Facts campaign started in March 2020 quickly after the pandemic hit. The campaign invited all Finnish social media influencers to participate but also selected some influencers for increased collaboration. None of the influencers however received financial compensation for posting for the campaign. The marketing agency responsible for the campaign created an information center 472 E. PÖYRY ET AL. for the influencers, sent out sixteen newsletters and organized two webinars on the pandemic and the imposed safety measures and restrictions. The influencers were asked to post about this fact-checked content and use a hashtag #coronafacts. We collected all Instagram posts that mentioned the campaign hashtag and their comments on May 4, 2020. For data collection, we used 4CAT, a tool provided by Digital Methods Initiative of University of Amsterdam, that can be used to scrape incoming posts on various forums, image boards and web platforms (Peeters & Hagen, 2018). At that time, the tool allowed scraping feed data from Instagram, which has however been disabled since. Thus, we have data ranging from March 7 to May 4, 2020, during which nine newsletters were sent out. Instagram Stories – short videos or photos that by default disappear after 24 hours – were collected manually if they had been saved to Instagram Highlights by the influencer. In the case of the Corona Facts campaign, three influencers had saved their Corona Facts Stories. We sorted out posts by public organizations and posts by individuals with less than 1000 followers. This resulted in 96 Instagram posts, 108 Stories and 1097 public comments made to the posts. Multiple story photos or videos were considered one story if they formed one clear entity (e.g., a longer video cut in shorter bits). Figure 1 presents the timeline of the Corona Fact posts (excluding Instagram Stories because their exact date is not provided). We used qualitative content analysis to see how the influencers interpreted the communication suggestions (according to the content and schedule of the newsletters) and how their followers reacted to these posts. Posts and comments were analyzed separately. In case the influencers interacted with their followers, we also analyzed the content of these interactions. We followed the procedure of inductive content analysis (Krippendorff, 2004; Kuckartz, 2014). After having collected the data set, a classification scheme of thematic categories was created, discussed and revised by two researchers using a subset of the data. While we were interested to see how strictly the influencers followed the campaign suggestions for communicating about the COVID-19 pandemic, the classes were allowed to generate from the data. Then, the full dataset was classified using the scheme by one researcher. The final classifications were cross-checked and discussed by the research team, and they are presented in Table 1. While the main goal of the analysis was to qualitatively understand the nature of the data, the share of each class is displayed to give the reader an understanding of their relative prevalence. The unit of analysis was one post or one comment. In case of posts, the analysis focused particularly on textual or oral content as opposed to visual content. In case of comments, it was sometimes needed to go back to the original context to understand its (likely) meaning. While influencers can be considered public figures and their posts are publicly open for anyone to see, we hid the identity of the commentators in the analysis phase. The only exception were comments that were from the Figure 1. Timeline of Corona Facts posts and comments and the publication of the newsletters (dotted lines). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION 473 influencer who had posted the original photo or video. To illustrate the findings, we present example messages from the data. All messages are however translated from Finnish to English, which works as fabrication particularly in case of the comments (Markham, 2012). Results Social media influencers’ means of communication In total, there were 204 posts by social media influencers on Instagram that mentioned the hashtag #coronafacts (96 posted to the feed and 108 to the Stories section). Sixty-six different influencers took Table 1. Categories of qualitative content analysis Influencer posts (feed, Stories) N % Example message Instructions, general facts General instructions about how to behave during the pandemic, and general facts about the virus and related issues 73 36% ”Hey, we have a message to you Let’s stay home. Let’s wash our hands. Let’s respect the professionals who are fighting for us. Let’s save lives. We will get through this together. #flattenthecurve #stayhome #covıd19 #corona #coronafacts” Direct sharing of campaign messages Direct sharing of campaign messages 45 22% ”Finnish Food Authority informs: There is no research evidence that dietary supplements would protect against the corona virus or cure the disease it has caused. — #coronafacts #foodsupplement #health #medicine #bloggers #influencer #influencermarketing #healthblog” Showing an example Demonstrating or describing how to behave during the pandemic and how to cope with it. Peer support. 32 16% ”Tomorrow we’ll go outdoors only with our own family, like we did today. Luckily we’re many, we live close to nature, and the spring is pretty. We’ve decided that we don’t meet any friends, even outdoors. I wrote a blog post about this decision and I included some tips for how to communicate this to kids’ friends!” Campaign Information about the Corona Facts campaign, informing about the reponsibilities of social media influencers 28 14% ”Hey you, we’re now needed @finnishgovernment has put its faith on social media influencers and asks us all to take part in relable communication about the corona virus. — Regardless if you have 200 or 20k followers – all voices are now important to speak for urgent matters.” Emotions Sharing of emotions, such as concern, humour, hope, respect 26 13% ”If something about these dreaded times is to stay, I wish they were the sense of community and respect for healthcare professionals. #flattenthecurve” 204 100% Comments (either by a follower or the influencer) Positive reaction Supportive messages, positive or supportive emojis, giving thanks, relationship work 687 63% ”More of these, please ”, ”Have a nice May Day and remember to eat lots of donuts ” Information sharing Sharing the same opinion, sharing information, answering questions 124 11% ”Mortality rates vary widely between countries and are largely affected by how badly the health care system is saturated. Washing your hands should be a basic thing, but yes, even I have paid more attention to it now.” Advice Giving advice, tips, sharing new ideas 71 6% ”You should look closely at what model to buy. A mere rectangular strip of fabric with rubber bands fits poorly. At least a couple of pleats should be at the edges to allow for stretching.” Concern Concern about the disease or its effects on oneself or other people, or about the restrictions affect the society or the economy sad reactions 42 4% ”I’m worried because my mediaction lowers my immunity”, ”That is truly irresponsible and selfish” Question Question about the virus, how to behave in certain situations, or about something that the influencer has posted (sincerely) 28 3% ”What is your opinion as a doctor, should meetings for less than 10 people be cancelled? What about two-person meetings?” Debate Contesting, pondering about the truth, irritation towards others 26 2% ”We cannot afford to keep everyone alive forever. According to the oath of the doctors, every person who dies is a failure. Should we start looking at the situation differently?” Unrelated Comments that do not fit to the context, links to other users, only hashtags 119 11% 1097 100% 474 E. PÖYRY ET AL. part in the campaign and, notably, a large share of them were women. While it is not possible to identify the gender of all the influencers (some are not personified at all), it could be estimated that at least 85% of them identified as women. There were both big influencers with tens of thousands of followers as well as small influencers with a few thousand followers. Instructions, general facts The most typical posts by the influencers concerned general facts and instructions on how to deal with the virus, the pandemic, and the following restrictions (37% of the posts). Many posts reminded followers about proper hand and coughing hygiene and asked everyone to stay at home and avoid unnecessary physical contacts. A common hashtag in these posts was “flatten the curve”, which suggested that the healthcare system should be spared from overflow of corona patients. While many of these posts aligned with the information shared by the Corona Facts campaign, they were more general and did not relate to the weekly or even daily updates from the government or the health officials. Among the photos that attracted the most likes and comments were a photo of 16 influencers arranged in a collage. In the photo, each influencer held a paper with a word, and, together, those words said: “Let’s stay at home, let’s wash hands. Let’s respect the professionals who fight for us, that way we’ll save lives. Together we’ll go through this. Everything will be alright. #flattenthecurve”. The same picture was shared by the participating influencers, but not all of them used the campaign hashtag. The concept of a collage photo was recreated also by travel and pet influencers. Direct sharing of campaign messages The next most common category of posts was posts that directly shared the campaign messages (20% of the posts). They were identifiable based on the ready-made visuals and texts provided by the marketing agency on their Instagram account or in their newsletters or webinars, or they were screenshots or shared posts from the website or Instagram account of the Finnish government or the Finnish institute for health and welfare. Unlike usual, these posts did not highlight the posting individual, but they merely forwarded and reminded about important public information. Content-wise, these posts concerned timely information about the virus, instructions on how to prevent an infection, and newly imposed restrictions to prevent the spreading of the virus. A share of these posts were also direct campaign messages and pictures about “Virtual May Day”, an event that helped people celebrate May Day virtually and apart from other people. One influencer for example, shared a campaign photo and wrote: “May Day has not been cancelled – it will be celebrated this year at home and virtually!”, see, Figure 2. Showing an example One way of communicating about the COVID-19 pandemic and the restrictions was showing an example on how to behave and cope (16% of the posts). Influencers for example, told that they had been staying at home, maintained an improved standard of hygiene, or had avoided seeing other people, for example, grandparents or friends. A strong element in these posts was peer support and consideration of the particular issues one’s followers might have; family-themed influencers posted about things to do with kids while staying at home, and travel influencers discussed how to find adventure in nearby locations. One influencer for example, posted a picture of two kids using a smartphone alongside a caption that said: Keeping in touch while social distancing Although it’d now be possible to travel to grandma, it’s not yet time for that long-awaited visit. Let’s all still stay at home, keep physical distance and avoid all unnecessary contacts #socialdistancing #stayhome #coronafacts #facetiming #twins #mymamahood A few influencers also shared their own experiences with the virus, either directly or through someone they know. One influencer had got a severe COVID-19 disease and she shared multiple, detailed stories of her case. With plain black text on white background, she began to describe her condition on her Stories as follows: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION 475 Another limitation relates to the way people interact on Instagram. Besides commenting on a photo or a video on the feed, people can also interact via direct messages that are private. These messages are naturally beyond a researcher’s reach, but the ability to communicate also via direct messages might affect what kinds of comments are being posted publicly. In this study, positive reactions and other positively oriented comments were numerous while negative and critical comments were rare. It might be more typical to post a positive comment publicly but send a negative comment privately. Future research could collaborate with influencers and study anonymized direct messages influencers receive from their followers (comparable to fan mail) to understand how followers perceive their content without the pressures of public visibility. Another limitation with regards to the comments relates to the possible content moderation performed by the influencers (c.f. Ruckenstein & Turunen, 2020). This is another factor that might create a bias towards more positive comments in the data. Finally, the context of study is likely to affect the results. When the COVID-19 pandemic hit Finland in March 2020, the consensus was that excess illnesses should be avoided, and the functionality of the healthcare system should be protected by social distancing. The government swiftly posed several restrictions for example, on traveling, businesses, and schools, and the government was very popular during this time (Yle, 2020). The contrast to the pandemic restrictions in neighboring country Sweden was, for example, sharp. Thus, it could be that in Finland influencers were unusually willing to take part in a government-initiated communication campaign. Research is therefore needed to understand more thoroughly the cultural, social, and political aspects that affect influencer participation in public health campaigns. Acknowledgments The authors are grateful for the financial support from Helsingin Sanomat Foundation (project Unconventional Communicators in the Corona Crisis) and Academy of Finland (decision number 320373). Disclosure statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s). Funding This work was supported by the Academy of Finland [320373]; Helsingin Sanomat Foundation [Unconventional Communicators in the Corona Crisis]. ORCID Essi Pöyry http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2940-8889 Hanna Reinikainen http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3165-4889 Vilma Luoma-Aho http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1316-3725 References Bainotti, L., Caliandro, A., & Gandini, A. (2021). From archive cultures to ephemeral content, and back: Studying Instagram Stories with digital methods. New Media & Society, 23(12), 3656–3676. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1461444820960071 Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. (2012, April). The role of social networks in information diffusion. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 519–528). New York, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. Bennett, L. (2014). ‘If we stick together we can do anything’: Lady Gaga fandom, philanthropy and activism through social media. Celebrity Studies, 5(1–2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2013.813778 Bennett, W. L., & Manheim, J. B. (2006). The one-step flow of communication. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 608(1), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716206292266 482 E. PÖYRY ET AL. Berryman, R., & Kavka, M. (2017). ‘I guess a lot of people see me as a big sister or a friend’: The role of intimacy in the celebrification of beauty vloggers. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017. 1288611 Bonnevie, E., Rosenberg, S. D., Kummeth, C., Goldbarg, J., Wartella, E., & Smyser, J. (2020). Using social media influencers to increase knowledge and positive attitudes toward the flu vaccine. Plos One, 15(10), 1–14. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240828 Borchers, N. S., & Enke, N. (2021). Managing strategic influencer communication: A systematic overview on emerging planning, organization, and controlling routines. Public Relations Review, 47(3), 102041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. pubrev.2021.102041 Brown, W. J. (2015). Examining four processes of audience involvement with media personae: Transportation, parasocial interaction, identification, and worship. Communication Theory, 25(3), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt. 12053 Brown, J., Ryan, C., & Harris, A. (2014). How doctors view and use social media: A national survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(12), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3589 Choi, S. (2015). The two-step flow of communication in Twitter-based public forums. Social Science Computer Review, 33(6), 696–711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314556599 Choi, J. (2016). Why do people use news differently on SNSs? An investigation of the role of motivations, media repertoires, and technology cluster on citizens' news-related activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.006 Duffy, B. E., & Hund, E. (2015). “Having it All” on social media: Entrepreneurial femininity and self-branding among fashion bloggers. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604337 Enke, N., & Borchers, N. S. (2019). Social media influencers in strategic communication: A conceptual framework for strategic social media influencer communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2019.1620234 Henley, J. (1 April 2020). Finland enlists social influencers in fight against Covid-19. The Guardian. https://www. theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/01/finland-enlists-social-influencers-in-fight-against-covid-19 Jenkins, E. L., Ilicic, J., Molenaar, A., Chin, S., & McCaffrey, T. A. (2020). Strategies to improve health communication: Can health professionals be heroes? Nutrients, 12(6), 1861. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12061861 Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, C. E. (1987). Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(2), 306. https://doi.org/10. 1037/0022-3514.53.2.306 Katz, E. (1957). The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 21(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1086/266687 Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H. Y. (2021). Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media. Journal of Business Research, 134(September), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.024 Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage. Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative text analysis: a guide to methods, practice and using software. Sage. Laughey, D. (2007). Key themes in media theory. McGraw-Hill. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 261(1), 194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716206292266 Leader, A. E., Burke-Garcia, A., Massey, P. M., & Roark, J. B. (2021). Understanding the messages and motivation of vaccine hesitant or refusing social media influencers. Vaccine, 39(2), 350–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020. 11.058 Lee, M. T., & Theokary, C. (2021). The superstar social media influencer: Exploiting linguistic style and emotional contagion over content? Journal of Business Research, 132(August), 860–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020. 11.014 Lee, J. E., & Watkins, B. (2016). YouTube vloggers’ influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5753–5760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.171 Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018. 1533501 Luoma-aho, V., Pirttimäki, T., Maity, D., Munnukka, J., & Reinikainen, H. (2019). Primed authenticity: How priming impacts authenticity perception of social media influencers. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2019.1617716 Markham, A. (2012). Fabrication as ethical practice. Information, Communication & Society, 15(3), 334–353. https://doi. org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.641993 Marôpo, L., Jorge, A., & Tomaz, R. (2020). ‘I felt like I was really talking to you!’: Intimacy and trust among teen vloggers and followers in Portugal and Brazil. Journal of Children and Media, 14(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798. 2019.1699589 Merton, R. K. (1957). Social Theory and social structure. Revised and enlarged edition. The Free Press. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION 483 Munnukka, J., Maity, D., Reinikainen, H., & Luoma-aho, V. (2019). “Thanks for watching”. The effectiveness of YouTube vlog endorsements. Computers in Human Behavior, 93(April), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb. 2018.12.014 Navarro, C., Moreno, A., Molleda, J. C., Khalil, N., & Verhoeven, P. (2020). The challenge of new gatekeepers for public relations. A comparative analysis of the role of social media influencers for European and Latin American professionals. Public Relations Review, 46(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101881 Nisbet, M. C., & Kotcher, J. E. (2009). A two-step flow of influence? Opinion-leader campaigns on climate change. Science Communication, 30(3), 328–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008328797 Peeters, S., & Hagen, S. (2018). 4CAT: Capture and analysis toolkit (version 0 (5)). Comput Software. Perfumi, S. C., Bagnoli, F., Caudek, C., & Guazzini, A. (2019). Deindividuation effects on normative and informational social influence within computer-mediated-communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 92(March), 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.017 Ping Helsinki (2020, July 1). Combating coronavirus together by sharing reliable information. Retrieved June 30, 2021, from: https://pinghelsinki.fi/en/combating-coronavirus-together-by-sharing-reliable-information/ Politico (31 March 2020). Finland taps social media influencers during coronavirus crisis. Politico. https://www.politico. eu/article/finland-taps-influencers-as-critical-actors-amid-coronavirus-pandemic/ Pöyry, E., Pelkonen, M., Naumanen, E., & Laaksonen, S. M. (2019). A call for authenticity: Audience responses to social media influencer endorsements in strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(4), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2019.1609965 Reinikainen, H., Laaksonen, S.-M., Pöyry, E., & Luoma-aho, V. (in press). Conquering the liminal space: Strategic social media influencer communication in the Finnish public sector during the COVID-19 pandemic. In O. Niininen (Ed.), Social media for progressive public relations. Routledge. Reinikainen, H., Munnukka, J., Maity, D., & Luoma-aho, V. (2020). ‘You really are a great big sister’–parasocial relationships, credibility, and the moderating role of audience comments in influencer marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3–4), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1708781 Ruckenstein, M., & Turunen, L. L. M. (2020). Re-humanizing the platform: Content moderators and the logic of care. New Media & Society, 22(6), 1026–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819875990 Soffer, O. (2019). Algorithmic personalization and the two-step flow of communication. Communication Theory, 31(3), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz008 Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53(March), 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011 Statista (2021). Distribution of Instagram users worldwide as of April 2021, by age and gender. https://www.statista.com/ statistics/248769/age-distribution-of-worldwide-instagram-users/ Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(8), 776–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296228002 Thorson, K., & Wells, C. (2016). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087 Trivedi, J., & Sama, R. (2020). The effect of influencer marketing on consumers’ brand admiration and online purchase intentions: An emerging market perspective. Journal of Internet Commerce, 19(1), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15332861.2019.1700741 Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2001). A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 71–102. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250959 Wang, Y., & Li, Y. (2016). Proactive engagement of opinion leaders and organization advocates on social networking sites. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2016. 1144605 Wellen, J. M., Hogg, M. A., Terry,D.J. (1998). Group norms and attitude–behavior consistency: The role of group salience and mood. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699. 2.1.48 Williams, M. L. (2020). Social media’s commodified, transgender ambassador: Caitlyn Jenner, celebrity activism, and social media. Celebrity Studies, 13(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2020.1782236 Wood, W. (2000). Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(February), 539– 570. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539 Yle. (2020, May 24). Yle poll: Corona crisis has unified Finland. https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/yle_poll_corona_crisis_ has_unified_finland/11366124 Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Nothhaft, H., & Werder, K. P. (2018). Strategic communication: Defining the field and its contribution to research and practice. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 487–505. https://doi. org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1493485 484 E. PÖYRY ET AL.