scieee Open visual document viewer

Change Detection of Tree Biomass with Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Quantitative Structure Modelling

Kaasalainen, S.,Krooks, A.,Liski, J.,Raumonen, P.,Kaartinen, H.,Kaasalainen, M.,Puttonen, E.,Anttila, K.,Mäkipää, R.

Full text

Remo e Sens. 2014, 6, 3906-3922; doi:10.3390/ s6053906 emo e sensing ISSN 2072-4292 www.mdpi.com/jou nal/ emo esensing A icle Change De ec ion o T ee Biomass wi h Te es ial Lase Scanning and Quan i a i e S uc u e Modelling Sanna Kaasalainen 1,*, Anssi K ooks 1, Ja i Liski 2, Pasi Raumonen 3, Ha i Kaa inen 1, Mikko Kaasalainen 3, Ee u Pu onen 1, Ka i An ila 1 and Raisa Mäkipää 4 1 Finnish Geode ic Ins i u e, Geodee in inne 2, FI-02431 Masala, Finland; E-Mails: Anssi.K ooks@ gi. i (A.K.); [email p o ec ed] (H.K.); [email p o ec ed] (E.P.); [email p o ec ed]i (K.A.) 2 Finnish En i onmen Ins i u e, Mechelininka u 34a, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland; E-Mail: Ja i.Liski@ympa is o. i 3 Tampe e Uni e si y o Technology, Depa men o Ma hema ics, P.O. Box 553, FI-33101 Tampe e, Finland; E-Mails: pasi. aum[email p o ec ed] (P.R.); Mikko.Kaasalaine[email p o ec ed] (M.K.) 4 Finnish Fo es Resea ch Ins i u e, Jokiniemenkuja 1, PL 18, FI-01301 Van aa, Finland; E-Mail: Raisa.Makipaa@me la. i * Au ho o whom co espondence should be add essed; E-Mail: Sanna[email p o ec ed]; Tel.: +358-295-308-031; Fax: +358-929-555-211. Recei ed: 29 Janua y 2014; in e ised o m: 21 Ma ch 2014 / Accep ed: 9 Ap il 2014 / Published: 30 Ap il 2014 Abs ac : We p esen a new applica ion o e es ial lase scanning and ma hema ical modelling o he quan i a i e change de ec ion o ee biomass, olume, and s uc u e. We in es iga e he easibili y o he app oach wi h wo case s udies on ees, assess he accu acy wi h labo a o y e e ence measu emen s, and iden i y he main sou ces o e o , and he ways o mi iga e hei e ec on he esul s. We show ha he changes in he ee b anching s uc u e can be ep oduced wi h abou ±10% accu acy. As he cu en biomass de ec ion is based on des uc i e sampling, and he change de ec ion is based on empi ical models, ou app oach p o ides a non-des uc i e ool o moni o ing impo an o es cha ac e is ics wi hou labo ious biomass sampling. The e iciency o he app oach enables he epea ing o hese measu emen s o e ime o a la ge numbe o samples, p o iding a as and e ec i e means o moni o ing o es g ow h, mo ali y, and biomass in 3D. OPEN ACCESS Remo e Sens. 2014, 6 3907 Keywo ds: e es ial lase scanning; au oma ic ee modelling; o es moni o ing; b anch size dis ibu ion; change de ec ion 1. In oduc ion The moni o ing o o es esou ces has adi ionally concen a ed on he olume o s em wood. This is because human in e es in o es s has s ongly ocused on his economically mos aluable o es cha ac e is ic. Today, he impo ance o o es s is seen in a wide pe spec i e. I is acknowledged ha se e al ecosys em se ices ha o es s p o ide a e ela ed o he whole biomass o ees a he han he s em only. These se ices include, o example, ca bon seques a ion, o es bioene gy esou ces and o es biodi e si y alue. T ee biomass is moni o ed using es ablished bu a he coa se me hods. A common me hod o biomass moni o ing (such as ha in he IPCC Guidelines [1]) is based on allome ic equa ions (e.g., [1,2]). These equa ions gi e he biomass es ima es as a unc ion o s em cha ac e is ics, such as ee heigh and he diame e [3,4]. The same equa ions a e also used o es ima e changes in he biomass based on changes in he s em cha ac e is ics [1]. The mo ali y o ee biomass componen s is moni o ed using li e collec o s placed below ee canopies o de i ing es ima es om canopy measu emen s (e.g., [5]). The li e p oduc ion measu emen s a e combined wi h he biomass es ima es o ob ain u no e a es o ee biomass componen s; he u no e a e is equal o he li e p oduc ion di ided by he biomass (e.g., [6]). These u no e a es a e hen used o es ima e li e p oduc ion based on he biomass es ima es. Al hough hese me hods a e p ac ical, hei eliabili y and use ulness can s ill be imp o ed. Fi s , he allome ic equa ions and he biomass u no e a es can be made mo e eliable and applicable o new condi ions by aking mo e measu emen s. Since he cu en allome ic equa ions and biomass u no e a es a e based on labo ious biomass and li e measu emen s, hey a e s ill based on ela i ely small da a se s ha ep esen selec ed in ensi ely s udied si es. Second, hese me hods do no p o ide all he in o ma ion needed o cu en and u u e analyses. Fo example, he size o li e elemen s is an impo an a ibu e a ec ing he decomposi ion o li e [7,8]. This in o ma ion is hus ele an o he ca bon budge o o es s, bu is e y labo ious o measu e om he li e collec o s. In addi ion, he dis ibu ion o he biomass wi hin a canopy is a key cha ac e is ic in unde s anding he ligh -use e iciency and he compe i i e s a us o a ee [9]. The ligh -use e iciency (LUE); i.e., he amoun o ca bon ixed pe uni o abso bed pho osyn he ically ac i e adia ion, inc eases wi h he p opo ion o ligh ha is ecei ed a low i adiances and is he e o e highe o clumped canopies [10]. Thus, as measu emen s o he canopy b anching pa e n can help o p edic he e iciency wi h which canopies ha es ligh o ca bon assimila ion. Since he LUE is equen ly used wi h he emo e-sensed No malized Di e ence Vege a ion Index (NDVI) o calcula e p oduc i i y, me hods ha imp o e he unde s anding o he a ia ion o he LUE a e impo an o global ca bon balance es ima es [11]. Te es ial lase scanning (TLS) has become inc easingly impo an in o es s udies because o i s capabili y o p o iding accu a e 3D ee da a wi h e icien and ligh weigh ins umen s o ield use. Thus a , TLS-based me hods ha e been es ablished o de ec ing o es a ibu es such as ee loca ion, he diame e a b eas heigh (DBH), heigh , s em olume, and he o al biomass [12–14]. The o al Remo e Sens. 2014, 6 3908 biomass has been shown o co ela e wi h he TLS poin densi y o dis ibu ion [13,15], DBH, and ee heigh , om which i is possible o e ie e wi h allome ic biomass equa ions [3,4,16]. These me hods p o ide he o al biomass o a ee and a s and, wi hou in o ma ion on i s dis ibu ion in he canopy. T ee modelling has hus a mos ly ocused on e ie ing he s em olume o o es ( imbe ) in en o y pu poses [17,18]. Qui e ecen ly, me hods ha e also been p esen ed o ee 3D s uc u e including b anches [19–21]. These s udies ha e also ex ended in o 3D econs uc ions o he s ump- oo sys ems [22,23]. An e o ange o ±10% has been achie ed o he main s em olume, whe eas o b anches, he cumula i e b anch olumes ha e been es ima ed a ±30% accu acy o b anches down o 7 cm in diame e [20]. Inc easing he numbe o scans has been shown o educe he e o s somewha [21]. Ge ing quan i a i e s uc u e models o ees wi h small b anches has, howe e , s ill been a challenge, and he small b anches ha e mos o en been excluded om he analysis. A plan opology model was p esen ed in [24] o desc ibe he opology and geome y o plan s. They also eco ded he spa ial coo dina es o plan s (e.g., b anch ips). In ou p e ious s udy, we ha e shown ha he s uc u e o ees can be cha ac e ized in de ail based on TLS measu emen s combined wi h 3D quan i a i e s uc u e modelling (which we he ea e call QSM) [25]. I hese measu emen s and his modelling we e epea ed o e ime, i could po en ially p o ide a la gely au oma ic, non-des uc i e and as means o es ima e he g ow h and mo ali y o ee biomass componen s in 3D. In ou QSM o ees, we use he geome ic p imi i es app oach wi h ci cula cylinde s. Al e na i e me hods o modelling he ee olume based on oxels and oxel skele ons exis (e.g., [14,26,27]). While he oxel and skele oniza ion models ha e been used success ully o ex ac ing ee me ics, such as he diame e and heigh [28], he QSM is di e en om hese models because i has been designed o ollow he simple mo phological ules o ee s uc u e (such as b anches a ached o he s em and sub-b anches being a ached o he main b anches, c . [25]) as a s a ing poin o he calcula ion. A pa icula challenge in he oxel me hods is ha hey equi e a comple e sampling o he ee su ace in o de o ill he in e io oxels. This equi es a la ge numbe o measu emen s and scan posi ions (e.g., 20–60 million poin s om 4 o 5 scan posi ions pe ee [28]). Wi h cylinde s, he ine i able gaps in he su ace sampling and he ac ha mos b anches a e sampled only om he bo om side a e no so c i ical. Simila ly, he oxel skele on models do no equi e a la ge numbe o measu emen s because he oxels a e only needed o he econs uc ion o he skele on and hen he olume is modelled, e.g., wi h cylinde s [27]. Changes in he o al biomass ha e been moni o ed wi h TLS and oxel o con ex hull models [29], bu mo e s udies a e needed o quan i y he dis ibu ion o he changes. The objec i es o his s udy we e o (1) e alua e he sui abili y o his app oach (p esen ed in [25]) o es ima ing changes in ee biomass, e.g., g ow h and li e p oduc ion; and (2) iden i y he mos impo an a eas o imp o emen . The compa ison wi h e e ence measu emen s also enabled us o imp o e he da a p ocessing and modelling s eps o op imize he p ocedu e by inding and elimina ing he sou ces o majo sys ema ic e o s in he measu emen (e.g., emo ing ex a noise) o modelling he smalles b anch ips. In his way, we imp o ed he p ocedu e o mo e eliable esul s. The change de ec ion app oach p esen ed in his pape is applied o ee-s anding ees. Ou u u e objec i e is o ex end he app oach in o la ge a eas and o alida e such plo -based modelling. We ha e used and will use he ou pu s o his p ocedu e o compu e ca bon emissions ia, e.g., he Yasso soil ca bon model as in [23]. Remo e Sens. 2014, 6 3909 This a icle is o ganized as ollows: he ma e ials and me hods a e p esen ed in Sec ion 2. The esul s o bo h he labo a o y and ield cases a e in Sec ions 3.1–3.3, and he discussion and conclusions a e p esen ed in Sec ions 3.4 and 4, espec i ely. 2. Ma e ials and Me hods 2.1. Samples We demons a e he app oach wi h wo case s udies: he i s one was ca ied ou in a labo a o y o a la ge (abou 2 m in leng h) aspen (Populus emula) b anch. We c ea ed a ime se ies o olume and leng h measu emen s by cu ing o pieces o he sub-b anches, a e which he b anch was scanned wi h a e es ial lase scanne (see Sec ion 2.2). The scanning was epea ed ou imes ( om h ee di ec ions each ime) and he cu s we e ca ied ou be ween each scan. The aim o hese measu emen s was o p o ide e e ence o alida e he b anch size ( he olume and leng h o he s em and all sub-b anches) es ima ion wi h he QSM model. The second case s udy was a ield moni o ing o changes in ee biomass in Espoonlah i, Finland. We p oduced a ime se ies o TLS poin clouds o a maple (Ace pla anoides) shown in Figu e 1. Fi e scans we e ca ied ou : in Feb ua y 2011, No embe 2011, No embe 2012, Ap il 2013, and No embe 2013. The changes in ee b anch olume and b anch leng h, caused by g ow h and mo ali y, we e modelled om each poin cloud. Figu e 1. (Le ) he maple ee in Espoonlah i (pho og aphed Feb ua y 2011). Some o he whi e sphe ical e e ence a ge s used o egis a ion a e also isible, be ween he lamp pos and he ee; (Righ ) a sec ion o he poin clouds om Feb ua y 2011 ( ed) and No embe 2011 (g een), showing a missing b anch deno ed by an a ow. 2.2. Te es ial Lase Scanning Bo h he ee and he b anch sample we e measu ed wi h a phase-based e es ial lase scanne Leica HDS6100, see Table 1 o scanne pa ame e s. The same scanne (and he same scanning Remo e Sens. 2014, 6 3910 pa ame e s) was also used in ou p e ious s udies [25]. The ins umen al pa ame e s ela ed o each measu emen a e lis ed in Table 2. The scanning was ca ied ou wi h he “High” esolu ion se up. To p oduce a poin cloud, h ee s a iona y TLS scans we e ca ied ou o each sample om di e en di ec ions, and hese scans we e co- egis e ed using whi e sphe ical e e ence a ge s ( isible in Figu e 1 du ing he TLS o he Espoonlah i maple, c . [13]). The co- egis a ion accu acy is bes desc ibed in e ms o he e o in loca ing he cen e poin s o he sphe ical e e ence a ge s, which a ied be ween 1 and 3 mm in he labo a o y. Howe e , he e a e g ea e sou ces o unce ain y, especially in ou doo measu emen s, caused by, e.g., he b anches mo ing du ing he scans. In Espoonlah i, some pa s o he a ge (such as he canopy) we e u he om he scanne , and he co- egis a ion accu acy a ied om 4 o 7 mm. The dis ance be ween he scanne and he ee a ied om 1 o 2 m in he labo a o y and 9–20 m in Espoonlah i. The aspen b anch was scanned be o e any cu s and a e each h ee cu s, om h ee di e en di ec ions each ime. A e he hi d cu , we ca ied ou wo independen scans (deno ed wi h cu 3A and 3B in he ollowing sec ions), i.e., al oge he six scans we e made. This was done o compa e he epea abili y o he measu emen and modelling p ocedu es. Table 1. Te es ial lase scanne pa ame e s. Scanne Leica HDS6100 Wa eleng h 650–690 nm Field o iew 360° × 310° Poin sepa a ion 0.036° Beam diame e 3 mm Beam di e gence 0.22 m ad Maximum Range 79 m Table 2. Measu emen speci ica ions o he labo a o y and ield case. Measu emen Labo a o y (aspen) Espoonlah i (maple) Numbe o poin s 390,000–460,000 1–5 million Ho izon al dis ance be ween scanne and b anch/ ee s em 1.5–1.9 m 7–12 m A e age poin densi y 11–25 poin s /cm2 2–5 poin s/cm2 The p e-p ocessing o he TLS da a was ca ied ou wi h he Z+F Lase Con ol 8 so wa e (Zolle + F öhlich GmbH). The dis ance measu emen o he scanne , based on phase di e ence, causes inc eased mixed pixel noise in complex s uc u es, whe e he lase beam hi s mul iple a ge s a he same ime. The measu emen noise was minimized wi h in ensi y- and poin -densi y based il e s a ailable wi h he Z+F so wa e. In his case, noise il e ing esul ed in he ejec ion o 1%–3% o he da a poin s. 2.3. Re e ence Measu emen s To change he b anch leng h and olume in he labo a o y, he sample b anches o he aspen we e cu a e each measu emen o poin clouds. The leng hs o he cu b anch pieces we e measu ed manually (wi h a s anda d me ic measu e). The o al olume emo ed in each cu was measu ed by weighing Remo e Sens. 2014, 6 3911 he cu b anches, and app oxima ing hei olume on he basis o hei densi y. The densi y o he esh sample b anches was measu ed by subme ging he b anch pieces in wa e and eco ding he inc ease o weigh o he wa e eplaced by he b anches. The weigh ep esen s he olume, and he esh weigh di ided by his olume gi es he densi y, which was used as a densi y app oxima ion o he en i e b anch. In his way, he app oxima e esh densi y o ou sample b anches was 0.925 kg/dm3. We also measu ed he o al leng h and olume o he en i e b anch (including all he sub-b anches) a e he hi d cu o b anches (a e which we made wo se s o scans, which we e p ocessed as wo independen h ee-scan measu emen s, 3A and 3B). Because he o al olume e e ence was e ie ed using he app oxima e densi y measu ed om small b anch bi s, some unce ain y may occu in he densi y o he la ge pa s o he b anch. These b anch leng h and olume alues we e compa ed o hose p oduced by TLS and he QSM model [25]. 2.4. Quan i a i e S uc u e Modelling (QSM) The b anch size and olume o each sample was compu ed using he quan i a i e s uc u e modelling me hod [25]. In he QSM, he su ace o he isible ee pa s is econs uc ed by making a lexible su ace model o he ee o model he s em and b anch sizes and he opological b anching s uc u e. The me hod uses a local app oach in which he poin cloud is co e ed wi h small se s co esponding o connec ed su ace pa ches in he ee su ace. Wi h hese pa ches he en i e ee is segmen ed in o s em and b anches. The pa ches a e andomly bu e enly dis ibu ed along he isible ee su ace and hei size de e mines he smalles de ails ha can be sepa a ed o he ee model. The segmen s a e hen modelled wi h collec ion o cylinde s i ed o he de ails o he segmen s. Wi h hese cylinde s, he b anching s uc u e, olume, and b anch size dis ibu ions, e c. can be app oxima ed bo h o he whole ee and some o i s pa s indi idually. We use cylinde s because o all he geome ic p imi i es ha app oxima e he local s em and b anch shape well, hey a e he mos obus and eliable o i . Mo e de ails o he model and i s alida ion a e p o ided in [25]. We also compa ed he QSM wi h he T iangula ed I egula Ne wo k (TIN), commonly used o il e ing lase scanne da a o digi al ele a ion model (DEM) gene a ion and p oducing 3D models o di e en objec s [30,31]. The TIN model was a educed 3D Delaunay iangula ion. The algo i hm had he ollowing s eps: 1. The aw poin cloud was i s iangula ed wi h 3D Delaunay iangula ion. 2. Te ahed ons wi h side leng hs o e a p ede ined h eshold (3 cm) we e emo ed. 3. The su ace o he educed iangula ion was sea ched and hen di ided in o sepa a e laye s using poin s on he su ace as ini ial poin s. 4. The second e ahed on educ ion un wi h 2 cm h eshold was ca ied ou o he e ahed ons in he wo ou e mos laye s. 5. The ee olume was es ima ed by summing he olume o he e ahed ons emaining a e bo h educ ion uns. No addi ional smoo hing was done o he poin clouds, hus some noise poin s nea b anches and he s em we e le , esul ing in o e es ima ion o he ee olume. Remo e Sens. 2014, 6 3912 3. Resul s and Discussion 3.1. Aspen B anch Measu ed in Labo a o y: Valida ion o B anch Size Modelling The changes in he olume (Table 3) and leng h (Table 4) o b anches es ima ed wi h he QSM ag eed well wi h e e ence measu emen s. The modelling was ca ied ou as i he b anch we e a small ee, i.e., he main b anch was segmen ed as “s em”, whe eas he sub-b anches a e ea ed as b anches. All changes a e mean alues o 10 modelling uns, whe e he size o he a e age pa ch emains cons an bu hei numbe and loca ions a y andomly be ween di e en models which a ec s he segmen a ion and i ed cylinde s. Typical anges o he s anda d de ia ions o he 10 models o each cu a e 5%–15% o he b anch olume and 1%–2% o he b anch leng h. Table 3. Change o aspen b anch olume (in (li es)) a e each cu . Cu s 3A and 3B ep esen wo independen scans o he ee a e he hi d cu ( he e e ence being he same). Cu 1 (L) Cu 2 (L) Cu 3A (L) Cu 3B (L) Re e ence −0.06 −0.06 −0.08 −0.08 QSM −0.02 −0.06 −0.11 −0.11 Re e ence, cumula i e −0.06 −0.11 −0.19 −0.19 QSM, cumul. −0.02 −0.08 −0.18 −0.18 Table 4. Cumula i e change o aspen b anch leng h (in me es) a e each cu . Cu s 3A and 3B ep esen wo independen scans o he ee a e he hi d cu ( he e e ence being he same). In “Re e ence (>5 cm)”, he smalles sub-b anches (less han 5 cm leng h) we e no included in he o al b anch leng h. Cu 1 (m) Cu 2 (m) Cu 3A (m) Cu 3B (m) Re e ence −3.85 −7.25 −10.43 −10.43 Re e ence (>5 cm) −3.08 −5.37 −7.97 −7.97 QSM −2.29 −5.06 −6.53 −6.37 The poin clouds and models a e p esen ed in Figu es 2 and 3. To compa e wi h he e e ence measu emen s, which we e ca ied ou o he cu pieces only, he modelling esul s a e also p esen ed he e as changes om he o iginal condi ion o he b anch (be o e any cu s). The model has unde es ima ed he cumula i e changes, which is mos likely a esul o inaccu acies in he measu emen ; see Sec ion 3.2 o mo e de ails. A close examina ion o he poin clouds and models (see Figu e 4) e ealed ha he smalles sub-b anches ( hose wi h leng h less han 5 cm) we e ha dly isible in he poin cloud, and had mos ly been le ou by he model. The numbe o poin s o hose bi s is oo small o o m a cylinde . To ge some insigh in o he e ec o his ea u e on he esul s, we made ano he leng h e e ence, whe e he smalles (<5 cm) sub-b anches had also been omi ed (see Table 4). In addi ion, some segmen a ion e o s we e also p esen , esul ing in he cylinde s o e lapping each o he (Figu e 4). A u he analysis on he o e all accu acy o he app oach is p o ided in Sec ion 3.2. Remo e Sens. 2014, 6 3913 Figu e 2. TLS poin clouds o he aspen b anch: he o iginal b anch (g een) and ha a e he las ( hi d) cu ( ed). The poin cloud has been plo ed in o an xyz-coo dina e sys em o show he scaling (in (me es)). Figu e 3. Quan i a i e s uc u e models o he aspen b anch (wi h cylinde s plo ed o e he poin cloud): (a) he o iginal b anch; (b) he b anch a e he hi d cu . The o de o b anches has been deno ed wi h colou s: he s em ( he main b anch) is blue, he i s o de and second o de b anches a e g een and ed, espec i ely. Remo e Sens. 2014, 6 3914 Figu e 4. E o sou ces in he QSM, ma ked wi h g een ci cles: (a) B anches sho e han 5 cm a e poo ly isible in he poin cloud (blue poin s) and ha e been omi ed by he model (no cylinde ); (b) Some cylinde s o e lap in he model. The QSM and TIN models a e compa ed in Figu e 5, which also p esen s he s anda d de ia ion e o s o he QSM. In he ini ial es s, bo h models o e es ima ed he b anch olume change by se e al o de s o magni ude. This esul s om he inaccu acy in measu emen , because he diame e s o he b anch ips a e less han o equal o he lase spo size (abou 3 mm) owa ds he b anch ips. The e o e, we used a modi ied app oach o he QSM p esen ed in [25], whe e he sizes o b anches wi h diame e less han 1 cm we e app oxima ed wi h a b anch diame e ha dec eases linea ly owa ds he b anch end. This imp o ed he esul s, al hough some disc epancy be ween he measu emen s and he model s ill emained. Ano he imp o emen was he emo al o ex a noise. Figu e 5. Compa ison o he QSM (blue) and TIN ( ed) models o : (a) The o al olume. The dec easing end has no been ep oduced in cu 2 by ei he o he models; (b) The o al leng h. The QSM s anda d de ia ions a e p esen ed as e o ba s. Re e ence measu emen s o o al olume and leng h, plo ed wi h g een symbols, only exis o cu 3. The TIN model has o e es ima ed he b anch olumes mo e han he QSM (c . Figu e 5), whe eas he leng hs ha e been unde es ima ed somewha . The TIN model seems o be mo e sensi i e o measu emen noise in his case han he QSM, especially in he case o hin b anches, o which he TIN model ends o include he noise poin s in he calcula ion. The compu a ional e e ence o b anch Remo e Sens. 2014, 6 3921 11. Ruimy, A.; Ke goa , L.; Bondeau, A. Compa ing global models o e es ial ne p ima y p oduc i i y (NPP): Analysis o di e ences in ligh abso p ion and ligh -use e iciency. Glob. Chang. Biol. 1999, 5, 56–64. 12. Pueschel, P. The in luence o scanne pa ame e s on he ex ac ion o ee me ics om FARO Pho on 120 e es ial lase scans. ISPRS J. Pho og amm. Remo e Sens. 2013, 78, 58–68. 13. Kanka e, V.; Holopainen, M.; Vas a an a, M.; Pu onen, E.; Yu, X.; Hyyppä, J.; Vaaja, M.; Hyyppä, H.; Alho, P. Indi idual ee biomass es ima ion using e es ial lase scanning. ISPRS J. Pho og amm. Remo e Sens. 2013, 75, 64–75. 14. P ei e , N.; Go e, B.; Win e halde , D. Au oma ic econs uc ion o single ees om e es ial lase scanne da a. In . A ch. Pho og amm. Remo e Sens. Spa . In . Sci. 2004, 35, 114–119. 15. Kaasalainen, S.; Hyyppä, J.; Ka jalainen, M.; K ooks, A.; Lyy ikäinen-Saa enmaa, P.; Holopainen, M.; Jaakkola, A. Compa ison o e es ial lase scanne and syn he ic ape u e ada da a in he s udy o o es de olia ion. In . A ch. Pho og amm. Remo e Sens. Spa . In . Sci. 2010, 38, 82–87. 16. Hun e , M.O.; Kelle , M.; Vic o ia, D.; Mo on, D.C. T ee heigh and opical o es biomass es ima ion. Biogeosciences 2013, 10, 8385–8399. 17. Liang, X.; Hyyppä, J.; Kaa inen, H.; Holopainen, M.; Melkas, T. De ec ing changes in o es s uc u e o e ime wi h bi- empo al e es ial lase scanning da a. ISPRS In . J. Geo-In . 2012, 1, 242–255. 18. Holopainen, M.; Vas a an a, M.; Kanka e, M.; Rä y, M; Vaaja, M.; Liang, X.; Yu, X.; Hyyppä, J.; Hyyppä, H.; Vii ala, R.; e al. Biomass es ima ion o indi idual ees using s em and c own diame e TLS measu emen s. In . A ch. Pho og amm. Remo e Sens. Spa . In . Sci. 2011, 38, 91–95. 19. Cô é, J.-F.; Widlowski, J.-L.; Fou nie , R.A.; Ve s ae e, M.M. The s uc u al and adia i e consis ency o h ee-dimensional ee econs uc ions om e es ial LiDAR. Remo e Sens. En i on. 2009, 113, 1067–1081. 20. Dasso , M.; Colin, A.; San enoise, P.; Fou nie , M.; Cons an , T. Te es ial lase scanning o measu ing he solid wood olume, including b anches, o adul s anding ees in he o es en i onmen . Compu . Elec on. Ag ic. 2012, 89, 86–93. 21. Keigh ley, K.E.; Bawden, G.W. 3D olume ic modeling o g ape ine biomass using T ipod LiDAR. Compu . Elec on. Ag ic. 2010, 74, 305–312. 22. Danjon, F.; Reubens, B. Assessing and analyzing 3D a chi ec u e o woody oo sys ems, a e iew o me hods and applica ions in ee and soil s abili y, esou ce acquisi ion and alloca ion. Plan Soil 2008, 303, 1–34. 23. Liski, J.; Kaasalainen, S.; Raumonen, P.; Akujä i, A.; K ooks, A.; Repo, A.; Kaasalainen, M. Indi ec emissions o o es bioene gy: De ailed modeling o s ump- oo sys ems. GCB Bioene gy 2014, in p ess. A ailable online: h p://onlinelib a y.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.12091/abs ac (accessed on 27 Janua y 2014). 24. Godin, C.; Cos es, E.; Sinoque , H. A me hod o desc ibing plan a chi ec u e which in eg a es opology and geome y. Ann. Bo . 1999, 84, 343–357. 25. Raumonen, P.; Kaasalainen, M.; Åke blom, M.; Kaasalainen, S.; Kaa inen, H.; Vas a an a, M.; Holopainen, M.; Disney, M.; Lewis, P. Fas au oma ic p ecision ee models om e es ial lase scanne da a. Remo e Sens. 2013, 5, 491–520. Remo e Sens. 2014, 6 3922 26. Hosoi, F.; Nakai, Y.; Omasa, K. 3-D oxel-based solid modeling o a b oad-lea ed ee o accu a e olume es ima ion using po able scanning LiDAR. ISPRS J. Pho og amm. Remo e Sens. 2013, 82, 41–48. 27. Bucksch, A.; Lindenbe gh, R. CAMPINO—A skele oniza ion me hod o poin cloud p ocessing. ISPRS J. Pho og amm. Remo e Sens. 2008, 63, 115–127. 28. Vonde ach, C.; Voeg le, T.; Adle , P. Voxel-based app oach o es ima ing u ban ee olume om e es ial lase scanning da a. In . A ch. Pho og amm. Remo e Sens. Spa . In . Sci. 2012, 39, 451–456. 29. Olsoy, P.J.; Glenn, N.F.; Cla k, P.E.; De ybe y, D.R. Abo eg ound o al and g een biomass o d yland sh ub de i ed om e es ial lase scanning. ISPRS J. Pho og amm. Remo e Sens. 2014, 88, 166–173. 30. Axelsson, P. DEM gene a ion om lase scanne da a using adap i e TIN models. In . A ch. Pho og amm. Remo e Sens. Spa . In . Sci. 2000, 33, 110–117. 31. Si hole, G.; Vosselman, G. Expe imen al compa ison o il e algo i hms o ba e-Ea h ex ac ion om ai bo ne lase scanning poin clouds. ISPRS J. Pho og amm. Remo e Sens. 2004, 59, 85–101. 32. Cao, J.; Tagliasacchi, A.; Olson, M.; Zhang, H.; Su, Z. Poin Cloud Skele ons ia Laplacian-Based Con ac ion. In P oceedings o 2010 IEEE Con e ence on Shape Modeling In e na ional, Aix-en-P o ence, F ance, 21–23 June 2010; pp. 187–197. 33. Yang, X.; S ahle , A.H.; Schaa , C.B.; Jupp, D.L.B.; Yao, T.; Zhao, F.; Wang, Z.; Cul eno , D.S.; Newnham, G.J.; Lo ell, J.L.; e al. Th ee-dimensional o es econs uc ion and s uc u al pa ame e e ie als using a e es ial ull-wa e o m lida ins umen (Echidna®). Remo e Sens. En i on. 2013, 135, 36–51. 34. Van Leeuwen, M.; Coops, N.C.; Hilke , T.; Wulde , M.A.; Newnham, G.J.; Cul eno , D.S. Au oma ed econs uc ion o ee and canopy s uc u e o modeling he in e nal canopy adia ion egime. Remo e Sens. En i on. 2013, 136, 286–300. © 2014 by he au ho s; licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land. This a icle is an open access a icle dis ibu ed unde he e ms and condi ions o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion license (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/3.0/).