scieee Open visual document viewer

Estimation of breed contributions to present and future genetic diversity of 44 North Eurasian cattle breeds using core set diversity measures

Bennewitz, Jörn,Kantanen, Juha,Tapio, Ilma,Li, Menghua,Kalm, Ernst,Vilkki, Johanna,Ammosov, Innokentyi,Ivanova, Zoya,Kiselyova, Tatyana,Popov, Ruslan,Meuwissen, Theo

Full text

Gene . Sel. E ol. 38 (2006) 201–220 201 c INRA, EDP Sciences, 2006 DOI: 10.1051/gse:2005036 O iginal a icle Es ima ion o b eed con ibu ions o p esen and u u e gene ic di e si y o 44 No h Eu asian ca le b eeds using co e se di e si y measu es Jö n Bennewi z∗a, Juha Kan anenb,IlmaTapiob, Meng Hua Lib,E ns Kalma, Johanna Vilkkib, Innoken yi Ammoso c,ZoyaI a n o a d, Ta yana Kiselyo ae, Ruslan Popo ,TheoH.E.Meuwisseng aIns i u e o Animal B eeding and Husband y, Ch is ian-Alb ech s-Uni e si y, 24098 Kiel, Ge many bBio echnology and Food Resea ch, MTT Ag i ood Resea ch Finland, 31600 Jokioinen, Finland cBa agay-Aly a, 678580, Sakha, Russia dYaku S a e Ag icul u al Academy, Ul. K asilniko a 15, Yaku sk, 677002, Sakha, Russia eDepa men o Gene ics and Bio echnology, All-Russian Resea ch Ins i u e o Fa m Animal Gene ics and B eeding, Moskowskoye shosse–55a, 189620 S . Pe e sbu g-Pushkin, Russia Depa men o Fa m Animals and B eeding, Minis y o Ag icul u e and Resou ces o Sakha, Yaku sk, 677007, Sakha, Russia gIns i u e o Animal and Aquacul u al Sciences, Ag icul u e Uni e si y o No way, Box 5052, 1432 Ås, No way (Recei ed 13 June 2005; accep ed 26 Oc obe 2005) Abs ac – Ex inc ion o b eeds h ea ens gene ic di e si y o li es ock species. The need o conse e gene ic di e si y is widely accep ed bu in ol es in gene al wo ques ions: (i) is he expec ed loss o di e si y in a se o b eeds wi hin a de ined u u e ime ho izon la ge enough o es ablish a conse a ion plan, and i so (ii) which b eeds should be p io i ised o such a conse - a ion plan? The p esen s udy uses a ma ke assis ed me hodology o add ess hese ques ions. The me hodology combines co e se di e si y measu es wi h a s ochas ic me hod o he es i- ma ion o expec ed u u e di e si y and b eed ma ginal di e si ies. The la e is de ined as he change in he o al di e si y o all b eeds caused by a one uni dec ease in ex inc ion p oba- bili y o a pa icula b eed. The s ochas ic me hod was alida ed by means o simula ions. A la ge ield da a se consis ing o 44 No h Eu asian ca le b eeds was analysed using simpli ied de e mined ex inc ion p obabili ies. The esul s show ha he expec ed loss o di e si y in his se wi hin he nex 20 o 50 yea s is be ween 1 and 3% o he ac ual di e si y, p o ided ha ∗Co esponding au ho : jbennewi z@ ie zuch .uni-kiel.de A icle published by EDP Sciences and a ailable a h p://www.edpsciences.o g/gse o h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1051/gse:2005036 202 J. Bennewi z e al. he ex inc ion p obabili ies which we e used a e app oxima ely alid. I his loss is o be e- duced, i is sufficien o include hose h ee o i e b eeds wi h he highes ma ginal di e si y in a conse a ion scheme. di e si y measu e /ma ginal di e si y /ex inc ion p obabili y /ca le b eeds /gene ic conse a ion 1. INTRODUCTION Ex inc ion o endange ed a m animal b eeds leads o an i e e sible loss o gene ic di e si y. Acco ding o he FAO [8], a ound one hi d o he eco ded li es ock b eeds a e classi ied as ha ing a high isk o ex inc ion and a ound 1000 ha e anished du ing he las 100 yea s. The need o conse e gene ic di- e si y is widely accep ed o biological, economic and cul u al easons [13]. A main eason is ha an abundan esou ce o gene ic di e si y wi hin each li es ock species is he p e equisi e o coping wi h pu a i e u u e changes in li es ock a ming condi ions. Because inancial unds a ailable o conse a- ion o di e si y a e limi ed, i is in gene al only possible o conse e a subse o impo an b eeds a he han all endange ed b eeds. Howe e , o any in- es iga ion ega ding gene ic di e si y wi hin a se o b eeds and subsequen ly o he assessmen o impo ance o pa icula b eeds o di e si y, a sui able di e si y measu e has o be applied. Wei zman [18, 20] desc ibed nice ma hema ical and biological p ope ies o a sui able di e si y measu e ( he so-called Wei zman c i e ia) and de el- oped a di e si y measu e ha ul illed hese c i e ia. Howe e , he Wei zman di e si y measu e was de eloped o assess di e si y ac oss species bu is inap- p op ia e ac oss b eeds [4,5]. Al e na i ely, Eding e al. [7] in oduced a co e se ha is buil by ela i e b eed con ibu ions in o de o maximise gene ic di e si y wi hin he co e se . In hei app oach, di e si y is de ined as he ge- ne ic a iance ha can be ound in pu a i e offsp ing ha a e ob ained om in e b eeding o hose b eeds ha con ibu e o he co e se [7]. A simila ap- p oach was de eloped by Caballe o and To o [4]. A d awback o his app oach migh be ha i gi es no pa icula weigh o he be ween b eed a iance, i.e. o he special allele and geno ype combina ions ha a e p esen wi hin b eeds. The e o e, an al e na i e co e se was ecen ly in oduced by Bennewi z and Meuwissen [2]. Thei co e se algo i hm es ima es ela i e b eed con ibu ions in o de o maximise o al gene ic a iance ha can be ound wi hin and be- ween b eeds. Bo h co e se s ag ee wi h he Wei zman c i e ia o a p ope di e si y measu e [2,7] and addi ionally hey a e less compu a ionally demand- ing e en i a la ge numbe o b eeds is included in he expe imen . B eed con ibu ions o p esen and u u e di e si y 203 Fo quan i ica ion o expec ed u u e di e si y and hence o he expec ed loss o di e si y, ex inc ion p obabili ies o a de ined ime ho izon ha e o be aken in o accoun . Gi en ha ex inc ion p obabili ies a e known (in eal li e hei es- ima ion is no a i ial ask, see [3, 12, 15]), Simiane e al. [17] p esen ed a de e minis ic me hod o he simul aneous calcula ion o expec ed u u e di e - si y and o ma ginal di e si ies o he b eeds. The la e one is de ined as he change in o al di e si y o all b eeds caused by a one uni dec ease in ex inc- ion p obabili y o a pa icula b eed by a conse a ion effo [17]. Howe e , he de e minis ic app oach in ol es 2N imes he compu a ion o he di e si y algo i hm, whe e Nis he numbe o b eeds included in he expe imen . This exponen ial inc ease in compu a ion effo limi s he applica ion o his algo- i hm o smalle da a se s. This is an e en g ea e p oblem when he Wei zman di e si y measu e is used because he Wei zman di e si y algo i hm is i sel compu a ionally e y demanding i many b eeds a e included [18]. This s udy in oduces a s ochas ic me hod o he simul aneous es ima ion o expec ed u u e di e si y and ma ginal di e si ies ha is ailo ed o la ge da a se s. The me hod was alida ed by means o simula ions and was applied o a la ge ield da a se consis ing o 44 No h Eu asian ca le b eeds using he wo co e se di e si y measu es men ioned abo e. The esul s (i) demons a ed he use ulness o he s ochas ic me hod and (ii) o he co e se gene ic di e si y measu es o he ma ke assis ed es ima ion o p esen and expec ed u u e gene ic di e si y and (iii) hey help o iden i y he mos impo an b eeds o he conse a ion o di e si y wi hin his se o No h Eu asian ca le b eeds, p o ided ha he assigned ex inc ion p obabili ies a e app oxima ely alid. 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1. Expec ed u u e di e si y and ma ginal di e si ies Assume a se o Nb eeds wi h known ex inc ion p obabili ies z o a de- ined ime ho izon . Fu he assume ha he gene ic di e si y Do his se is es ima ed and he applied di e si y measu e ul ils he ollowing Wei zman c i e ia: Mono onici y in species (Dshould no inc ease when a popula ion is emo ed) and win p ope y (addi ion o a b eed ha is a copy o a b eed al- eady p esen in he se should no change D). Fo he es ima ion o expec ed u u e di e si y and o b eed ma ginal di e si ies, he ollowing sampling algo- i hm can be applied. The algo i hm epea edly gene a es a sample s om he b eeds included in he se . I s a s wi h he illing in o an indica o ec o k o dimension N(N=numbe o b eeds). Each elemen kiin kis alloca ed o 204 J. Bennewi z e al. one b eed i, i is ei he se o ze o wi h an ex inc ion p obabili y zi(b eed iis ex inc a ime ) o o one wi h a p obabili y 1 – zi(b eed iis ali e a ime ). The b eeds wi h ki=0 a e emo ed om he cu en sample sand he di e si y es ima ion algo i hm is applied o his sample. The es ima ed di e si y wi hin he sample, Ds, is eco ded. The algo i hm is epea ed S imes (i.e. S diffe en samples s). The expec ed di e si y a he end o he de ined ime ho izon can be es ima ed as: E(D )=1 S S  s=1 Ds,(1) and he a iance o he expec ed di e si y as a (D )=σ2 D =1 S−1 S  s=1 (Ds−E(D ))2.(2) The co a iance s uc u e o kand D is a k D =Qg gσ2 D ,(3) whe e Qis a ma ix o dimension N×Nand con ains he a iance o ki( ha is zi(1 – zi)) on he diagonal elemen s and ze o elsewhe e. σ2 D is a scala and can be ob ained using (2). The ec o g(dimension N) con ains he co a i- ance be ween he kiand D , and hese can be ob ained om he Ssamples. The ma ginal di e si y o b eed i,mi, is hen es ima ed using he ollowing eg ession: mi=bD ,ki×ki=co (D ,ki) a (ki).(4) No e ha he ob ained ma ginal di e si ies will be posi i e due o he eg ession on kiin (4). I is expec ed ha his me hod will yield accu a e es ima es o Sbeing la ge. This s ochas ic app oach was compa ed o he de e minis ic me hod o Simiane e al. [17] ou lined in he ollowing. A he end o he ime ho izon 2Ndiffe en combina ions o kiwi hin ka e possible, hus 2Ndiffe en ec o s migh exis , each wi h p obabili y P(k). Fo a ce ain ec o kj he p obabili y can be es ima ed as ollows: P(kj)= N  i=1ki+(−1)kizi.(5) The mean and a iance o D a e E(D )= 2N  j=1 P(kj)Dj,and a (D )= 2N  j=1 P(kj)D2 j−[E(D )]2,(6) B eed con ibu ions o p esen and u u e di e si y 205 whe e Djis he di e si y acco ding o kj. The ma ginal di e si y o b eed iis calcula ed as he pa ial de i a i e o E(D ) wi h espec o zi: mi=+ ∂E(D ) ∂zi ·(7) The posi i e sign makes i di ec ly compa able wi h he ma ginal di e si ies ob ained om (4) (see [17] o compu a ional de ails). This me hod will p o- duce co ec mies ima es (igno ing e o s in he di e si y measu e). Howe e , i becomes ob ious ha hese o mulae equi e he calcula ion o 2N imes he di e si y measu e, which becomes compu a ionally e y difficul o e en im- possible o la ge N. 2.2. Co e se di e si y measu es Assume a se o Nb eeds wi h a known kinship ma ix Mo dimension N×N. The maximum a iance o al (MVT) me hod o ms a co e se in which he o al gene ic a iance o a hypo he ical quan i a i e ai is maximised [2]. The ela i e con ibu ions o he b eeds o he MVT co e se a e es ima ed as [2] cm =1 4M−1F−1NM−1F−4 1NM−11N ·M−11N,(8) whe e cm is he ela i e con ibu ion ec o o dimension Ncon aining he con ibu ions, Fis a ec o o dimension N ha con ains he wi hin b eed kin- ship, i.e. F=diag(M), and 1Na ec o o dimension Ncon aining ones. The MVT di e si y measu e (Dm ) wi hin he co e se is hen calcula ed as [2] Dm (MVT co e se ) =1+cm F−2cm Mcm .(9) The co e se o Eding e al. [7] is buil by ela i e b eed con ibu ions in o - de o maximise he gene ic a iance in he po en ial offsp ing o a conse ed popula ion ha is ob ained by in e b eeding he conse ed b eeds. I will be e med maximum a iance offsp ing (MVO) co e se in he ollowing. The el- a i e b eed con ibu ions o he MVO co e se (s o ed in he ec o cm o)a e es ima ed as [7] cm o =M−11N 1NM−11N ·(10) The MVO di e si y measu e (Dm o) wi hin he co e se can be es ima ed as [7] Dm o(MVO co e se ) =1−cm oMcm o.(11) 206 J. Bennewi z e al. Bo h con ibu ion ec o s, cm and cm o, a e es ima ed unde he es ic ion ha he con ibu ions a e ze o o posi i e and ha hey sum up o one. I he b eeds showed nega i e con ibu ions, he mos nega i e con ibu ion was se o ze o and he con ibu ion ec o was ecalcula ed wi hou he co espond- ing b eed. This is epea ed un il no u he nega i e con ibu ion es ima es a e obse ed. In p ac ice he a e age kinship ma ix Mis gene ally unknown, bu can be es ima ed om molecula ma ke in o ma ion [6], esul ing in ˆ M.ˆ Mcan hen be used in he equa ions (8)–(11). Howe e , mo e accu a e con ibu ion ec- o s a e ob ained i his me hod is ex ended wi h boo s apping [2]. B ie ly, a boo s ap sample bis gene a ed by sampling he indi iduals wi hin b eed and he ma ke loci ac oss b eeds simul aneously wi h eplacemen . Fo each b, he kinship ma ix is es ima ed by a log-linea model [6] and subsequen ly he co esponding con ibu ion ec o s (cm band cm ob) a e es ima ed using equa- ions (8) and (10). Addi ionally he wo di e si y measu es Dm band Dm ob a e calcula ed o each busing (9) and (11). A o al o Bboo s ap samples a e gene a ed. The inal boo s ap es ima es o he con ibu ion ec o s a e he ollowing: cm =1 B B  b=1 cm b,and cm o =1 B B  b=1 cm ob.(12) The inal boo s ap es ima es o Dm and Dm oa e he ollowing: Dm =1 B B  b=1 Dm b,and Dm o=1 B B  b=1 Dm ob.(13) 2.3. Simula ion To es he pe o mance o he p oposed sampling app oach o i s abili y o es ima e accu a e expec ed u u e di e si y and ma ginal di e si ies, i was compa ed by means o simula ions wi h he de e minis ic app oach. Nb eeds (N=10, 20, espec i ely) we e simula ed o each eplica e, one base b eed (consis ed o 50 indi iduals) and N−1 b eeds ha we e o med by ission om he base b eed. The numbe o gene a ions conside ed was 50. Fo each indi- idual a numbe o 20 unlinked gene ic ma ke loci we e assumed. Fo each b eed an ex inc ion p obabili y was sampled om he in e al 0.1/0.9. Because some cons ella ions we e compu a ionally e y demanding o simula e and analyse, he numbe o eplica es was es ic ed o 10. Fo de ails o he simu- la ion p o ocol see [2]. B eed con ibu ions o p esen and u u e di e si y 207 The pedig ee in o ma ion was eco ded du ing he simula ion and was used o calcula e he ue a e age kinship ma ix M. I was used o calcula e he ue ac ual di e si ies using equa ions (8)–(11) and o calcula e he ue expec ed u u e di e si ies and he ue ma ginal di e si ies by he de e minis ic o mu- lae (Eqs. (5)–(7)). The geno ypes o gene a ion 50 we e used o es ima e he ma ke es ima ed kinship ma ix ˆ Mby a weigh ed log-linea model [6]. The ac- ual di e si y was es ima ed by wo diffe en me hods. Fi s by he use o ˆ Min equa ions (8)–(11) and second by he boo s ap app oach (Eqs. (12) and (13)). The expec ed u u e di e si y as well as he ma ginal di e si ies o he b eeds we e es ima ed using he ollowing h ee app oaches. Fi s by he use o ˆ M in equa ions (8)–(11) and he de e minis ic o mulae (5)–(7), second by he boo s ap app oach (Eqs. (12) and (13), B=100) and he de e minis ic o mu- lae (5)–(7), and hi d by he boo s ap app oach (Eqs. (12) and (13), B=100) and he sampling algo i hm (Eq. (1)–(4)), b eeds wi h ki=0 we e emo ed om all boo s ap samples). Fo he las app oach he numbe o samples was a ied (S=10, 100, 1000, 10000). 2.4. No h Eu asian ca le b eeds A da a se o 44 diffe en na i e and comme cial ca le b eeds o igina ing om a la ge geog aphic egion (i.e. om he Scandina ian and he Bal ic coun ies, Finland, Russia, Byelo ussia, Uk aine and Poland) was examined. The Russian b eeds included in he s udy we e om he Eu opean pa o he Russian Fede a ion excep he Yaku ian ca le, which o igina e om Asia. The Yaku ian ca le make he da a se o pa icula in e es because his b eed is classi ied as a Tu ano-Mongolicus ype o ca le [1, 9]. This ca le b eed is an endange ed na i e b eed in he Sakha Republic ( o me ly he Yaku ia Republic) in he no heas o Sibe ia in Russia. The da a se includes bo h in ensi ely selec ed comme cial b eeds and less selec ed land aces. Fu he in o ma ion o he b eeds can be ound a h p://neu ocad.l a.l /. The b eed samples we e geno yped a he ollowing 20 mic osa elli e ma ke s: BM1824, BM2113, ETH10, ETH225, ETH3, HEL5, ILSTS005, INRA023, INRA035, INRA005, BM1818, CSSM66, ETH152, HEL1, HEL13, HEL9, ILSTS006, INRA032, INRA037 and INRA063. A mo e de ailed desc ip ion o he b eed geno ype da a se will be published elsewhe e. I was analysed by he wo co e se algo i hms using he boo s ap app oach as desc ibed abo e. A o al o 100 (B=100) boo s ap samples we e gene a ed and hese we e s o ed o he ma ginal di e si y es ima ion. The ela i e b eed con ibu ion ec o s as well as he conse ed di e si y we e es ima ed using he equa ions (8)–(13). Gene ic 208 J. Bennewi z e al. dis ances we e ob ained om he ma ke es ima ed kinships as desc ibed in [5] and hey we e isualised in a dend og am using he PHYLIP so wa e [10]. Expec ed u u e di e si y as well as ma ginal di e si ies we e es ima ed using he sampling algo i hm (Eqs. (1)–(4)) applied o he s o ed 100 boo - s ap samples and using he di e si y measu es ob ained om equa ions (12) and (13). A o al o wen y housand samples we e pe o med (S=20000). The es ima ion o ex inc ion p obabili ies needs a subs an ial amoun o da a [3,15]. These we e no a ailable o he majo i y o he 44 b eeds. The e- o e, he b eeds we e classi ied in o i e diffe en isk classes acco ding o hei numbe o b eeding emales. Simpli ied ex inc ion p obabili ies o he b eeds we e hen ob ained by assigning ex inc ion p obabili ies o he co esponding isk class. I was assumed ha hese a e alid o a ime ho izon be ween 20 and50yea sin o he u u e.The i ediffe en isk classes and he assigned ex inc ion p obabili ies za e he ollowing: class one (less han 100 b eeding emales) z=0.8; class wo (be ween 100 and 1000 b eeding emales) z=0.6; class h ee (be ween 1000 and 5000 b eeding emales) z=0.4; class ou (be- ween 5000 and 10000 b eeding emales) z=0.2; and class i e (mo e han 10000 b eeding emales) z=0.02. An ex inc ion p obabili y abo e ze o was assigned o he i e, because a comple ely sa e b eed is no alid [15]. Fo he isk class o he b eeds in his s udy as well as o o he b eed in o ma ion see he Appendix. Fo each b eed, he conse a ion po en ial (CP) was es ima ed as CPi=zi×mi. The conse a ion po en ial quan i ies how bene icial i would be in e ms o di e si y o make a b eed comple ely sa e. 3. RESULTS 3.1. Resul s om he simula ions The esul s om he expec ed u u e di e si y es ima ion a e p esen ed in Table I. I seems ha i is sligh ly easie o es ima e he expec ed u u e di e - si y i he numbe o b eeds included is low. No subs an ial diffe ences be ween he esul s ob ained om he diffe en me hods we e obse ed. E en he sam- pling app oach wi h a low numbe o samples p oduced eliable u u e di e - si y es ima es. The co ela ion be ween he es ima ed a iances o he expec ed u u e di e si ies we e on a simila ly high le el (no shown) indica ing ha he second momen can also be es ima ed accu a ely by he sampling app oach. The a e age co ela ion be ween ue and es ima ed ma ginal di e si ies is shown in Table II. The de e minis ic app oach p oduced mo e accu a e es ima es when applied o he boo s ap ma ke es ima ed kinship ma ices. B eed con ibu ions o p esen and u u e di e si y 209 Table I. A e age co ela ion be ween es ima ed and ue expec ed u u e di e si y o he diffe en me hods and numbe o b eeds (N), esul s om he simula ions. Me hodaMVT co e se MVO co e se N=10 N=20 N=10 N=20 11111 2 0.918 0.794 0.923 0.903 3 0.930 –b0.921 –b 4(S=10) 0.888 0.561 0.763 0.938 4(S=100) 0.932 0.911 0.921 0.889 4(S=1000) 0.924 0.887 0.910 0.899 4(S=10000) 0.931 0.901 0.915 0.903 aMe hod 1: Use o Mma ix in equa ions (8)–(11) and de e minis ic app oach (Eqs. (5)–(7)), ue scena io. Me hod 2: Use o ˆ Mma ix in equa ions (8)–(11) and de e minis ic app oach (Eqs. (5)–(7)). Me hod 3: Use o boo s ap ˆ Mma ices and de e minis ic app oach (Eqs. (5)–(7)). Me hod 4: Use o boo s ap ˆ Mma ices and s ochas ic app oach (Eqs. (1)–(4)), Sdeno es he numbe o samples. bCompu a ionally oo demanding o es ima ion. Table II. A e age co ela ion be ween es ima ed and ue ma ginal di e si y o he diffe en me hods and numbe o b eeds (N), esul s om he simula ions. Me hodaMVT co e se MVO co e se N=10 N=20 N=10 N=20 11111 2 0.871 0.812 0.856 0.821 3 0.921 –b0.843 –b 4(S=10) 0.489 0.493 0.410 0.236 4(S=100) 0.833 0.688 0.807 0.736 4(S=1000) 0.908 0.853 0.874 0.825 4(S=10000) 0.916 0.858 0.891 0.843 a,bSee Table I. Fu he mo e, he de e minis ic app oach always p oduced mo e accu a e es- ima es han he s ochas ic app oach (Tab. II). Hence, i is ad isable o apply he de e minis ic app oach i possible (small/mode a e N) and o apply he boo s ap s a egy. O he wise, i he de e minis ic app oach is eplaced by he s ochas ic sampling algo i hm, he educ ion in accu acy is only small i a ea- sonably high numbe o samples a e pe o med. In gene al, o a gi en Si is easie o ob ain accu a e es ima es o a se wi h small N. Some o he es ima es o he ma ginal di e si ies we e nega i e due o es ima ion e o . These es i- ma es we e se o ze o. 216 J. Bennewi z e al. As al eady men ioned, he es ima ion o ex inc ion p obabili ies is a diffi- cul ask [3, 12, 15]. The e o e, in his s udy hey we e de e mined by simply assigning p obabili ies o he de ined i e isk classes o endange men . In o - de o es he sensi i i y o he somewha a bi a y alues, wo diffe en se s o assigned ex inc ion p obabili ies we e used. The i s se was as desc ibed abo e and he ex inc ion p obabili ies o he second se we e exac ly he hal om hose o he i s se . Consequen ly, wo ma ginal di e si y es ima es o each b eed we e es ima ed. A linea model was applied ha included he b eed and he se o ex inc ion p obabili ies (ei he se one o se wo) as ixed e - ec s. The null hypo hesis was ha bo h ma ginal di e si ies wi hin a b eed we e he same, he al e na i e hypo hesis was ha a leas o one b eed he ma ginal di e si ies we e no he same. The esul s o his model sugges ed o ejec he null hypo hesis (P<0.01 o bo h di e si y measu es). In gene al, he ma ginal di e si ies we e somewha highe o he highe ex inc ion p ob- abili ies, howe e , wi hou changing he anking o de o he b eed ma ginal di e si ies (no shown). The expec ed loss o di e si y was a ound 50% lowe o he se o lowe ex inc ion p obabili ies. Based on hese esul s, i is ben- e icial o ha e mo e accu a e ex inc ion p obabili y es ima es because mo e p ecise conclusions could be d awn om he esul s ob ained. An al e na i e o he applied combina ion o ex inc ion p obabili ies and di e si y measu es is he so-called ‘sa e se sa e se +1’ app oach as used in [7]. By using his app oach, he anking o endange ed b eeds o conse a ion p io i y is done acco ding o hei con ibu ion o he di e si y o a sa e (i.e. no endange ed) se o b eeds. The ad an age is ha no ex inc ion p obabili ies a e needed, i only has o be decided which b eeds o m he sa e se . 4.3. Conse a ion o he No h Eu asian ca le b eed gene ic di e si y As men ioned abo e, e en wi hou any conse a ion effo he expec ed loss o di e si y wi hin his se o b eeds is low, ega dless o he applied di e si y measu e. I , howe e , e en his small loss is o be educed, i is no help ul o educe he ex inc ion p obabili ies o he mos endange ed b eeds wi hou conside ing he ma ginal di e si ies because he e is i ually no ela ionship be ween he ex inc ion p obabili y on he one hand and he ela i e b eed con ibu ion and ma ginal di e si y on he o he hand as shown in Table IV. Simila esul s ound in a diffe en da a se we e epo ed by [17]. Assume a conse a ion scheme in which he cos o make a b eed sa e (i.e. b inging i s ex inc ion p obabili y close o ze o) is independen om i s ex inc- ion p obabili y and mo e o less equal o all b eeds. Unde hese condi ions, B eed con ibu ions o p esen and u u e di e si y 217 he b eeds wi h he highes conse a ion po en ial would ecei e he highes p io i y o he inclusion in he conse a ion p og amme. In he p esen s udy he i e b eeds wi h he highes conse a ion po en ial o he MVT di e si y measu e a e Yaku ian ca le, Bohus Poll, Ringamala ca le, Red Danish 1970 and Väne ca le. Fo he MVO, hese b eeds a e he Ringamala ca le, Bohus Poll, Doela ca le, La ian Blue and Swedish Moun ain ca le. I by including hem in a conse a ion plan he ex inc ion p obabili y o hese b eeds would be close o ze o, he e would be almos no expec ed loss o di e si y a he end o he ime ho izon (no shown). Howe e , hese assump ions migh only be alid in ex-si u conse a ion schemes (e.g. ans e ing a deposi o gene ic ma- e ial om endange ed b eeds o a genebank), bu no in in-si u conse a ion schemes, whe e he b eeds a e conse ed wi hin he p oduc ion sys em. Fo he la e si ua ion, Simiane e al. [17] p oposed a mo e sophis ica ed amewo k o iden i y he mos efficien conse a ion plan. The cu en s udy p o ides he p e equisi e o apply he me hods o [17], gi en ha he unknowns in he me hod can be eplaced by eliable es ima es. Howe e , i is easonable o as- sume ha hose h ee o i e b eeds wi h high conse a ion po en ial will also be ecommended o a conse a ion plan by he algo i hms o [17]. Th oughou his s udy he ocus was based exclusi ely on gene ic di e si y as a c i e ion o he conse a ion o a b eed. O he conse a ion c i e ia such as adap a ion o a speci ic en i onmen , special ai s o economic in e es o his o ical o cul u al alue a e discussed by e.g. [11,13,16]. 5. CONCLUSION I was shown ha he sampling algo i hm in combina ion wi h he wo co e se gene ic di e si y measu es p o ides a sui able s a is ical ool o he ma ke assis ed es ima ion o p esen and expec ed u u e di e si y and o b eed ma ginal di e si ies, gi en ha ex inc ion p obabili ies o he b eeds a e known. The analysis o he No h Eu asian ca le b eeds e ealed ha wi h- ou any conse a ion effo s he expec ed loss o di e si y du ing he nex 20 o 50 yea s is be ween 1 and 3% om ac ual di e si y, p o ided ha he sim- pli ied de e mined ex inc ion p obabili ies a e app oxima ely alid. I his loss was o be educed o e en s opped by a limi ed conse a ion und, i seems o be sufficien o in es he a ailable money in he educ ion o he ex inc ion p obabili y o hose h ee o i e b eeds wi h he highes ma ginal di e si y and he highes conse a ion po en ial. These a e no necessa ily he mos endan- ge ed b eeds. 218 J. Bennewi z e al. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Jö n Bennewi z was suppo ed by a g an om he Ge man Academic Exchange Se ice (Deu sche Akademische Aus auschdiens , DAAD). REFERENCES [1] Banniko a L.V., Zuba e a L.A., Gene ic s uc u e o some na i e and comme - cial b eeds o ca le (Bos au us) om Eu asia, Russian J. Gene . 31 (1995) 597–607. [2] Bennewi z J., Meuwissen T.H.E., A no el me hod o he es ima ion o he ela- i e impo ance o b eeds in o de o conse e he o al gene ic a iance, Gene . Sel. E ol. 37 (2005) 315–337. [3] Bennewi z J., Meuwissen T.H.E., Es ima ion o ex inc ion p obabili ies o i e Ge man ca le b eeds by popula ion iabili y analysis, J. Dai y Sci. 88 (2005) 2949–2961. [4] Caballe o A., To o M.A., Analysis o gene ic di e si y o he managemen o conse ed subdi ided popula ions, Conse . Gene . 3 (2002) 289–299. [5] Eding J.H., Meuwissen T.H.E., Ma ke based es ima es o be ween and wi hin popula ion kinships o he conse a ion o gene ic di e si y, J. Anim. B eed. Gene . 118 (2001) 141–159. [6] Eding J.H., Meuwissen T.H.E., Linea me hods o es ima e kinships om gene ic ma ke da a o he cons uc ion o co e se s in gene ic conse a ion schemes, J. Anim. B eed. Gene . 120 (2003) 289–302. [7] Eding J.H., C ooijmans R.P.M.A., G oenen M.A.M., Meuwissen T.H.E., Assessing he con ibu ion o b eeds o gene ic di e si y in conse a ion schemes, Gene . Sel. E ol. 34 (2002) 613–633. [8] FAO, Wo ld wa ch lis o domes ic animal di e si y, 3nd ed., Rome, 2000, h p://www. ao.o g/dad-is/. [9] Felius M., Ca le b eeds. An Encyclopedia, Misse ui ge e ij b , Doe inchem, NL, 1995. [10] Felsens ein J., PHYLIP (Phylogeny In e ence Package) Ve sion 3.5c, Uni e si y o Washing on, 1995. [11] Gandini G., Villa E., Analysis o he cul u al alue o local li es ock b eeds: a me hodology, J. Anim. B eed. Gene . 120 (2003) 1–11. [12] Gandini G., Olli ie L., Danell B., Dis l O., Geo goudis A., G oene eld E., Ma yniuk E., an A endonk J.A.M., Wolliams J.A., C i e ia o assess he de- g ee o endange men o li es ock b eeds in Eu ope, Li es . P od. Sci. 91 (2004) 173–182. [13] Oldenb oek J.K., Genebanks and he conse a ion o a m animal gene ic e- sou ces. DLO, Lelys ad, 1999. [14] Piyasa ian N., Kingho n B.P., Balancing gene ic di e si y, gene ic me i and pop- ula ion iabili y in conse a ion p og ammes,J. Anim. B eed. Gene . 120 (2003) 137–149. B eed con ibu ions o p esen and u u e di e si y 219 [15] Reis -Ma i S.B., Simiane H., Gibson J., Hano e O., Rege J.E.O., Wei zman’s app oach and conse a ion o b eed di e si y: an applica ion o A ican b eeds, Conse . Biol. 17 (2003) 1299–1311. [16] Ruane J., A c i ical e iew o he alue o gene ic dis ances in conse a ion o animal gene ic esou ces, J. Anim. B eed. Gene . 116 (1999) 317–323. [17] Simiane H., Ma i S.B., Gibson J., Hano e O., Rege J.E.O., An app oach o he op imal alloca ion o conse a ion unds o minimize loss o gene ic di e si y be ween li es ock b eeds, Ecol. Econ. 45 (2003) 377–392. [18] Thaon d’A noldi C., Foulley J.-L., Olli ie L., An o e iew o he Wei zman app oach o di e si y, Gene . Sel. E ol. 30 (1998) 149–161. [19] To o M.A., Caballe o A., Cha ac e isa ion and conse a ion o gene ic di e - si y be ween b eeds. Session G3.4. 55 h Annual Mee ing o he Eu opean Associa ion o Animal P oduc ion, 5–8 Sep embe , 2004, Bled, Slo enia. [20] Wei zman M.L., On di e si y, Qua . J. Econ. 107 (1992) 363–405. 220 J. Bennewi z e al. APPENDIX In o ma ion abou he b eeds included in he ield da a se . B eed Sample size Sample o igin Risk classa Byelo ussian Red 23 Byelo ussia Fi e Danish Je sey 41 Denma k Fi e Es onian Red 40 Es onia Fi e Finnish Ay shi e 46 Finland Fi e Finnish Hols ein-F iesian 43 Finland Fi e Icelandic ca le 44 Iceland Fi e Kholmogo y 42 Russia Fi e La ian B own 40 La ia Fi e Li huanian Black and Whi e 41 Li huania Fi e Li huanian Red 40 Li huania Fi e No wegian Dai y ca le 38 No way Fi e Polish Black and Whi e 30 Poland Fi e Swedish Hols ein-F iesian 44 Sweden Fi e Swedish Red and Whi e 39 Sweden Fi e Ya osla l 44 Russia Fi e Is oben 49 Russia Fou Suksun 40 Russia Fou Blacksided T oende 34 No way Th ee Es onian Na i e 40 Es onia Th ee Swedish Moun ain ca le 41 Sweden Th ee Telema k ca le 46 No way Th ee Uk ainian Whi eheaded 11 Uk aine Th ee Wes e n Finnca le 41 Finland Th ee Doela ca le 35 No way Two Eas e n Finnca le 31 Finland Two Eas e n Red Polled 11 No way Two Ju land b eed 49 Denma k Two La ian Blue 40 La ia Two La ian Danish Red 40 La ia Two Li huanian Ligh G ey 41 Li huania Two Li huanian Whi e Backed 40 Li huania Two No h Finnca le 26 Finland Two Pecho a 33 Russia Two Red Danish 1970 39 Denma k Two Swedish Red Polled 34 Sweden Two Uk ainian G ey 30 Uk aine Two Väne ca le 18 Sweden Two Wes e n Fjo d ca le 41 No way Two Wes e n Red Polled 36 No way Two Yaku ian ca le 54 Russia Two Bohus Poll 14 Sweden One Danish Black-Pied 1965 27 Denma k One Fjällnä a ca le 15 Sweden One Ringamala ca le 20 Sweden One aClassi ica ion done acco ding o he numbe o b eeding emales as ollows: class one (less han 100 e- males), class wo (be ween 100 and 1000 emales), class h ee (be ween 1000 and 5000 emales), class ou (be ween 5000 and 10000 emales), class i e (mo e han 10000 emales). F om his, class one is c i ically endange ed and class i e no endange ed.