scieee Open visual document viewer

A corpus-based study of Thai persuasive texts : a transitivity analysis of talisman advertisements

Patpong, Pattama Jor

Abstract

This study aims to explore talisman advertisements as examples of persuasive discourse widely found in Thailand. In the Thai context, the advertising of talismans and Buddha images seems prevalent in a wide range of printed media - leaflets, newspapers, magazines, and books. Data for this paper are drawn from a corpus consisting of twenty talisman advertisements. All of them are taken from Thailand';s best selling-printed newspaper - Thairath. This talisman corpus is composed of 629 clause complexes and 2,565 clause simplexes (involving a little over 20,000 words). The study explores the talisman advertisements stratally by investigating three strata - context, semantics and lexicogrammar. Contextually, the generic structure of the persuasive discourse - Generic Structural Potential (Hasan, 1984b/1996) - is proposed. Semantically, some nuclear and elaborative semantic properties realizing each generic stage are discussed. Lexicogrammatically, an exploration of experiential resources is the main focus of this study: how talisman advertisements are construed grammatically in the transitivity system of Thai.

Full text

A Co pus-based S udy o Thai Pe suasi e Tex s: A T ansi i i y Analysis o Talisman Ad e isemen s Pa ama Jo Pa pong, Ins i u e o Language and Cul u e o Ru al De elopmen , Mahidol Uni e si y This s udy aims o explo e alisman ad e isemen s as examples o pe suasi e discou se widely ound in Thailand. In he Thai con ex , he ad e ising o alismans and Buddha images seems p e alen in a wide ange o p in ed media  lea le s, newspape s, magazines, and books. Da a o his pape a e d awn om a co pus consis ing o wen y alisman ad e isemen s. All o hem a e aken om Thailand’s bes selling-p in ed newspape  Thai a h. This alisman co pus is composed o 629 clause complexes and 2,565 clause simplexes (in ol ing a li le o e 20,000 wo ds). The s udy explo es he alisman ad e isemen s s a ally by in es iga ing h ee s a a  con ex , seman ics and lexicog amma . Con ex ually, he gene ic s uc u e o he pe suasi e discou se  Gene ic S uc u al Po en ial (Hasan, 1984b/1996)  is p oposed. Seman ically, some nuclea and elabo a i e seman ic p ope ies ealizing each gene ic s age a e discussed. Lexicog amma ically, an explo a ion o expe ien ial esou ces is he main ocus o his s udy: how alisman ad e isemen s a e cons ued g amma ically in he ansi i i y sys em o Thai. K EYWORDS : co pus, pe suasi e discou se, alisman, ad e isemen , ansi i i y analysis 1 I NTRODUCTION 1 This esea ch aims o ex end Thai discou se s udies based on na a i es and news epo s o pe suasi e discou se and o build up a co pus-based s udy o ad e isemen ex ype ocusing on alisman ad e isemen s. In pa icula , his s udy explo es sys em o TRANSITIVITY  esou ces o cons uing human expe iences. This esea ch will epo p elimina y esul s o explo ing ad e ising discou se. This s udy was based on a small co pus o alisman ad e isemen s. The da a we e d awn om wen y alisman 1 I would like o exp ess my deepes g a i ude o Ch is ian M.I.M Ma hiessen o his con inued suppo s and encou agemen . I wish o exp ess my app ecia ion o he o ganise s o he 19 h Eu opean Sys emic Func ional Linguis ics Con e ence and Wo kshop a Saa land Uni e si y. I would like o hank pa icipan s a his Sys emic Wo kshop o hei commen s on he ma e ial I p esen ed. I would like o exp ess my hank ulness o M Richa d Hiam o his edi ing suppo . I am alone esponsible o any e o s o misunde s andings in i s concep ion. 2 ad e isemen s published in he bes selling Thai newspape  Thai a h. This alisman co pus was composed o 615 clause complexes and 2,565 clause simplexes (in ol ing a li le o e 20,000 wo ds). In his pape I will epo on how pe suasi e discou se is s a ally explo ed by in es iga ing pa e ning wi hin each “con en ” s a um  con ex , seman ics and lexicog amma ( ocusing on TRANSITIVITY sys em). 2 T EXT TYPOLOGY AND TEXT TYPE A sys emic collec ion o di e en ex ypes is e e ed as a ex ypology  a con inuous mul idimensional space along he cline o ins an ia ion. O e he las h ee decades, nume ous s udies ha e a emp ed o explo e and classi y na u ally occu ing ex s. Se e al p oposals ha e been made o se c i e ia and ex end linguis ic simila i ies and di e ences among a ious kinds o ex s (Bibe , 1989; Dijk, 1972; Eggins & Slade 1997; Feez, 1995; Longac e, 1974; Ma in, 1992; Plum, 1998; Vi anen, 1992; U e, 1989). Tex ypes a e sys emic pa e ns o ins an ia ion, loca ed along he cline o ins an ia ion a he in e media e egion be ween he wo poles o he cline  sys emic po en ial and ex ins ances (Ma hiessen, Te uya, and Wu o hcoming: 1): see Figu e 1. Tex ypes ha e also been e e ed as “ egis e s” and “gen es”. In e ms o ex -based esea ch, hese e ms a e used in e changeably and a e all based on he cline o ins an ia ion. Figu e 1: Loca ion o ex ypes ( egis e ) along he cline o ins an ia ion (Halliday and Ma hiessen 2004: 28) Figu e 1 emphasises he powe o he ins an ia ion dimension in ep esen ing a con inuum dimensionali y o ex ins ance and po en ial sys em. The cline o ins an ia ion anges om: (i) sys emic pa e ns o ex ins ances which a e d awn om p o iling o ex samples; (ii) sub-po en ial o ins ance ype; and (iii) o e all sys emic po en ial o a gi en language buil up by gene aliza ion ac oss a collec ion o ex ypes. 3 A he le el o con ex , he cline o ins an ia ion ex ends om si ua ions (ins ance) o con ex o cul u e (po en ial), wi h si ua ion ypes and ins i u ions occupying he egion in e media e be ween hese wo poles. 3 A DVERTISEMENT AND ITS LOCATION IN U RE ’ S TEXT TYPOLOGY (1989) U e (1989) p oposes a signi ican amewo k o classi ying ex s, widely known as ex ypology (see Table 1). The ex ypology is based on ou dimensions (P.P. emphasises): specializa ion (specialized and non-specialized), medium (spoken and w i en), social pu pose (expounding, epo ing, ec ea ing, sha ing, ecommending, enabling, explo ing, and doing), and expe ien ial domain ( e lec ion and ac ion). Table 1: U e’s ex ypology (1989) w i en spoken dialogue monologue dialogue specialized 1 Le e Re e ence book Lec u e Deba e expounding e lec ion Menu Tex book non-specialized 2 Ques ionnai e His o y S a emen in e idence C oss examina ion epo ing Biog aphy News epo 3 Comic s ip Memoi s Radio commen a y D ama ec ea ing No els Folk play S o ies Collabo a i e na a i e 4 Le e , pe sonal Dia y Reminiscence Con e sa ion sha ing 5 Le e , business   Co-ope a ion doing ac ion 6 Le e , agony aun Ad e isemen s P aye s Consul a ion ecommending Blu b Ad ice Business messages Wa nings 7 Open le e : exho a ion Ac o pa liamen Se mon Demons a ion enabling Regula ions Knowledge specialized 8 Le e o he edi o C i ical s udies Speech (TV alks) Discussion explo ing e lec ion In es iga ions 4 Based on U e’s ex ypology, ad e isemen s, as one o ex ypes, a e loca ed in non- specialized ealm. They a e classi ied as a w i en monologic ex ype. Thei social pu poses a e conce ned wi h ecommending. They in ol e ac ion a he han e lec ion. In addi ion, he no ion o ad e isemen as a ex ype in he ex ypology amewo k esona es wi h he Cook’s cha ac e is ic o ad e isemen s as a discou se ype (Cook 1992: 5). The ollowing sec ion deals wi h li e a u e e iew o language o ad e isemen . 4 L ANGUAGE OF ADVERTISEMENT Ad e isemen is an in e es ing esea ch opic. I is s udied in many disciplines namely mass media communica ion, ields ela ed o business (i.e. economics, ma ke ing, and managemen ), and linguis ics, In e ms o linguis ic explo a ion, language o ad e ising was ho oughly s udied by Leech (1966), Dye (1988), and Cook (1992). Leech p o ides p elimina y explo a ion o English s anda d ad e ising. In his s udy, he s udy o ad e ising language is pa ly based on Halliday’s con ibu ion (Halliday 1961). Based on Sys emic Func ional Linguis ics, Leech’s s udy co e s wo main dimensions: STRATIFICATION (i.e. lexicog amma , seman ics, and con ex ) and RANK (i.e. wo ds (including compound wo ds), g oups / ph ases (including nominal g oups and e bal g oups), and clauses) (P.P. emphasizes). Dye examines ad e ising as a o m o communica ion in con empo a y socie ies and discuses i in i s cul u al and economic con ex . Some aspec s o ad e ising language a e also examined. Cook’s explo es ad e isemen s as a discou se ype. Tha is, ad e ising is iewed as a p ominen discou se ype in all con empo a y socie ies. He p o ides a comp ehensi e in oduc ion o ad e ising discou se by in es iga ing he language o complemen a y ad e isemen s. Fou een p o o ypical ea u es o ad e isemen s a e also p o ided (Cook 1992: 214). The ad e ising is also explo ed in e ms o i s s a egic goals. Ves e gaa d and Sch Οde (1985) elabo a e a p o o ypical desc ip ion o s a egic goals o ad e ising copy p oposed by Lund (1947: 83). Fi e s a egic goals ha should be achie ed by ad e ise s a e a ac ing p ospec i e cus ome ’s ATTENTION, a ousing INTEREST, s imula ing DESIRE, c ea ing CONVICTION, and ge ing a posi i e ACTION (as ci ed in Ves e gaa d and Sch Οde 1985: 49). These s a egic equi emen s go back o he beginning o he wen ie h cen u y and ha e lead o a numbe o a ian s (Unge e , 2004). In hei ad e ising explo a ion, a en ion has been hea ily paid on ad e isemen o women’s luxu y p oduc s appea ing in expensi e women’s magazines. The ad e ising language was la e s udied by Toolan (1988). Toolan p oposes s uc u al componen s o ad e isemen s. He also p o ides a guideline o s anda d ea u es o English ad e isemen s. In addi ion, he s udy o ad e ising language was s udied in e ms o in o ma ion p ominence by F ies (1993). In his s udy, ad e isemen s a e in es iga ed in e ms o Theme – Rheme s uc u e. A new e m is coined  N-Rheme ( o New Rheme) e e ing o he las cons i uen o clause simplexes o clause complexes. In his s udy, 63 English w i en ad e isemen s a e examined. N-Rhema ic in o ma ion and Thema ic in o ma ion a e in es iga ed and compa ed o see whe e 5 in o ma ion which is di ec ly ele an o he pe suasi e goals o he ad e isemen s (e.g., company o p oduc name, p oduc ea u es, p oduc unc ions, p oduc e alua ions) is placed in he clause s uc u e. The s udy e eals ha hose pe suasi e unc ions o ad e ising ypically a e placed a he N-Rheme posi ion and gi en ocal a en ion. These ou main s udies explo e ad e ising language as i is embedded in con ex o si ua ion. Tha is, we canno s udy ad e isemen wi hou a gene al pic u e o he ela ion be ween language and si ua ion (Leech 1966: 4). Based in li e a u e e iew, i can be seen ha he e a e a numbe o s udies o English ad e isemen s. Mo eo e , esea ches on Thai ad e isemen s a e mainly ocused on e ec s o ad e ising on mass media, ma ke ing and ad e ising s a egies. The e is, howe e , no a emp o examine Thai ad e isemen s in sys emic unc ional e ms. This esea ch is he i s a emp o explo e Thai alisman ad e isemen s. 5 T EXT SELECTION This s udy was a p elimina y esea ch. I aimed o explo e a g amma ical pe spec i e on discou se and o build up a co pus-based analysis o ad e isemen ex ype (U e 1989). In his cu en s udy, as an ini ial s age o he co pus-based analysis, wen y alisman ad e isemen s we e analysed. They we e aken om he bes selling Thai newspape  Thai a h. The wen y ex s we e collec ed om Ma ch 2005 o Ma ch 2007. The e we e 144 ela i e equencies o p in ed copies o hese wen y alisman ad e isemen s (see Table 2). The e a e 615 clause complexes and 2,565 clause simplexes. The ollowing sec ion deals wi h a s a al analysis o he wen y alisman ad e isemen s. I begins wi h con ex s a um. This is ollowed by a p elimina y explo a ion o seman ic s a um. Then he sys em o TRANSITIVITY o he wen y alisman ad e isemen s a e analysed. Table 2: Tex selec ion and numbe o clauses analysed Tex Ti le (in b ie ) ideology / symbol equencies o p in complexes simplexes o al o wo ds 1. Pho Pu Chu Chok Phoem Phun Sap c ea es mi acles human: Jujaka 41 33 124 1,034 2. Nok Khum Ma Rum calling o p ospe i ies animal: bi d: Nok Khum 24 54 258 1,866 3. Cia Buay and holy powe animal: ep ile: d agon and u le 18 28 90 818 4. “ Richly weal h ” o Luang Pho Phun, Phailom Temple animal: bi d: namely Sa ika plan : lo al pa asi e namely Ma um 9 23 79 620 5. Powe o he G ea Ruan Tu le animal: u le 8 28 98 743 6. “ Luk Om Phayakmekha ” o Kh u Ba K i sana In hawanno animal: ige 5 39 108 986 7. The g ea es supe na u al powe o mi aculous Thep Nang Chan se ies 9 model “ Comple e Success ” Goddess namely Thep Nang Chan 5 31 112 948 6 8. “ Yod Ke o Luang Pho Khun Pa i su ho ” Talisman is made o auspicious subs ances 4 46 230 1,913 9. “Kai Fa ” o Luang Pho Khun animal: pheasan 4 25 140 1,380 10. “ Fish calling o p ospe i ies ” animal: ish 4 14 93 878 11. Luk Sawa plan 4 28 137 889 12. Nangkhwak KhwakSap (Nangkhwak calling o p ospe i y) Ma Rum Khwak Sap (Ma Rum calling o p ospe i y) plan 3 56 239 2,101 13. Ka Fak Ma Rum o e s luck and o une lo al pa asi e 3 21 83 665 14. K acapnguen K acap houng o Luang Pho Phe . Plan : a kind o wa e ches nu (T apa bico nis) 3 27 127 992 15. “ Ngoknguen Ngok houng ” o Kh uba Khamkheunkaew non speci ied 3 18 69 750 16. Pla Taphiannguen Taphian houng animal: ish 2 35 135 1,202 17. Ph asomde Wa Rakhang se ies “ he mos popula mold 150 yea s ”. Talisman is made o auspicious subs ances 1 32 131 1,264 18. Floa ing Taku non speci ied 1 17 101 766 19. Nang Khwak calling o p ospe i y – G ea o une house liza d o Luang Pho Phe Sai houngpha ana Temple human: Nang Khwak animal: liza d, u le 1 26 81 838 20. Ph asomde Nangph aya So. Ko. Talisman is made o auspicious subs ances 1 34 130 1,106 To al 144 615 2,565 21,759 6 C ONTEXT OF ADVERTISEMENT DISCOURSE Language is iewed as one kind o a highe -o de semio ic sys em  a complex and adap i e sys em o making meaning (Halliday 1985: 7; Ma hiessen 2001). This means ha language is explo ed “ecologically”, and i is always in es iga ed in ela ion o, ins ead o being insula ed om, i s en i onmen . In o he wo ds, language is in es iga ed h ough na u ally occu ing ex s unc ioning in i s con ex . 6.1 C ONTEXT OF SITUATION : R ECOMMENDING GOODS - OR - SERVICES The ealiza ion o si ua ional con ex o a gi en language is based on he me a unc ional spec um: ield is ealized by he idea ional me a unc ion, eno by he in e pe sonal one, and mode by he ex ual one (Halliday 1978; Halliday and Hasan 1985; Ma in 1992). Based on Halliday (1977: 200-201; 1978: 142-143; 1985: 12), he h ee con ex ual alues a e desc ibed as ollows: Field as he social ac ion is conce ned wi h wha is going on in he si ua ion o ecommending goods-o -se ices: he na u e o he social p ocesses ha make up ad e isemen s, and he na u e o he domain o expe ience cons ued by pa icula ex ype. 7 Teno as he ole s uc u e is conce ned wi h who is aking pa in he si ua ion: he na u e o he in e ac an s’ oles in he si ua ion hey a e ope a ing in, he na u e o speech oles enac ed h ough he exchanges ha making up he ad e isemen s, and he ela ionship be ween he in e ac an s in e ms o social hie a chy and dis ance. Mode as he symbolic o ganiza ion is conce ned wi h he ole ha language is playing in he un olding con ex : he di ision be ween language and o he social p ocesses, in c ea ing si ua ion, he channel assigned o language. I includes ole o language, channel, and medium. In o de o gi e a con ex o si ua ion o he ad e isemen s in gene al and alisman ad e isemen s in pa icula , I cha ac e ize he con ex ual alues o he ad e isemen s ep esen ed in e ms o ield, eno , and mode. Table 3 summa ises he h ee con ex ual alues o he ad e ising discou se. Table 3: The con ex ual alues o ad e isemen discou se con ex ual alues sub ypes desc ip ion Field social p ocesses comme cial ecommenda ion; ecommending goods-o - se ices o a p ospec i e public h ough gi ing in o ma ion s a egy, mass media, newspape (p in ed o ms) social ac ion pe suade cus ome s o pu chase goods-o -se ices domain na u e o in o ma ion being gi en: in o ma ion gi en wi h comme cial ansac ion goal Teno ins i u ional ole copy w i e − cus ome s hie a chy (i) unequal: copy w i e as an expe – cus ome s as no ices in his pa icula in o ma ion (c . Wigh 1972: 9 as ci ed in Ves e gaa d and Sch Οde (1985; 2)); (ii) equal: copy w i e as an expe – p ospec i e cus ome s as alisman expe s who seek o good alismans ha mee hei desi es (c . Ves e gaa d and Sch Οde (1985: 2)) in e ac an expe : copy w i e / audience: in e es ed public, especially alisman buye s, who a e seeking o good luck and o une, plus some g oups o special conce ns (whose ac ions many be a ec ed by he in o ma ion, e.g. alisman p oduce s) dis ance no speci ic ela ionship be ween copy w i e s and cus ome s speech ole in o ma ion gi e − in o ma ion ecei e Mode medium W i en, p in , p ose o ma wi h pho og aphic p esen a ion u n- aking monologue be ween unequal pa icipan s (Toolan 1988: 54) and equal pa icipan s 8 Mode he o ical mode pe suasi e mode, he symbolic o ganiza ion o he ex in ol ing he p agma ic pu pose o ien ed o he ield o public in e es ; i is accompanied by o he isual modes, pho os o success ul indi iduals, alismans sold 6.2 C ONTEXT UAL REALIZATION : TEXT STRUCTURE As men ioned abo e, a he con ex ual s a um, ad e isemen s can be iewed in e ms o a iables o ield, eno , and mode. These con ex ual alues can be ealized s uc u ally by di e en s ages un olding h ough ime. Leech (1966: 59) p oposes a p ess ad e isemen s uc u e. (as shown in Figu e 2). This ad e isemen s uc u e is u he elabo a ed and discussed by Toolan (1988: 55) as illus a ed in Figu e 3. Figu e 2: Leech’s p ess ad e isemen s uc u e (Leech 1966) As illus a ed in Figu e 2, he s anda d componen s o p ess ad e isemen s a e o ganized in o a se ies o o de ed elemen s  om op o bo om. The headline and signa u e line a e obliga o y componen s o a p ess ad e isemen , while o he componen s a e op ional and can be omi ed (Leech 1966: 59). 9 Figu e 3: Toolan’s ad e isemen componen s (Toolan 1988) Figu e 3 illus a es he componen s ha can be supe imposed o in eg a ed wi h o he componen s by means o images, pic o ial p esen a ion, whe eas he o he i e componen s a e e bal exp essions. They ypically occu in he e ical sequence. In sys emic unc ional linguis ics, he s uc u al s ages men ioned abo e a e known as “Gene ic S uc u e Po en ial” (GSP). The in e es in gene ic (o schema ic) s uc u e o ex s has been g ea ly in luenced by Hasan (Halliday and Hasan 1985; Hasan 1978, 1984b/1996, and 1984c) and Ma in (1992). Fahey (2005) p oposes a Gene ic S uc u e Po en ial o magazine ad e isemen s as p esen ed in Figu e 4. Figu e 4: Fahey’s Gene ic S uc u al Po en ial o magazine ad e isemen (adap ed om Fahey 2005) 16 Figu e 8: Fou p ima y p ocess ypes and wo in e media e p ocess ypes 9.1 C ONSTRUING THE FLOW OF EVENTS In his sec ion, I will illus a e how alisman ad e isemen s a e ep esen ed; ha is, clauses a e iewed as ep esen a ions (Halliday and Ma hiessen 2004; Ma hiessen 1995, 1999). I is ep esen ed as he low o e en s: how he alisman ad e isemen s a e p esen ed h ough he clauses o cons uing human expe iences (i.e. expe iences o ad e isemen copy w i e s, alisman’s belie e s, gene al cus ome s as well as po en ial / p ospec i e cus ome s). 9.2 N UCLEAR TRANSITIVITY PROFILE OF THE TALISMAN ADVERTISEMENTS The e a e six p ocess ypes ins an ia ed in he alisman ad e isemen s. The six p ocess ypes a e ma e ial, beha iou al, men al, e bal, ela ional, and exis en ial. The coun s a e p esen ed in Table 7. 17 Table 7: Rela i e selec ions o p ocess ypes wi h ins an ia ion o P ocess ype [N = 2,518] [N – numbe o simple clauses and embedded clauses] P ocess ype Sub ype Numbe o clauses Pe cen age happening ma e ial doing 1,073 42.61 % beha iou al 10 0.40 % pe cep i e cogni i e deside a i e men al emo i e 305 12.11 % e bal 264 10.48 % a ibu e ela ional iden i ying 707 28.08 exis en ial 159 6.32 % Table 7 shows he equency o selec ion o di e en p ocess ypes a e aged o e he wen y alisman ad e isemen s. This p o ides a p o ile o he equency o ins an ia ion o he sys em choices which cons i u e his pa icula ad e ising discou se. As Table 7 shows, he mos equen selec ion is ma e ial a a ound 42.61 % ( he ansi i i y g amma o happening and doing). This is ollowed by ela ional a a ound 28.08 % ( he ansi i i y g amma o being and ha ing). I is in u n ollowed by men al a a ound 12.11 % ( he ansi i i y g amma o sensing). The nex selec ion is e bal a a ound 10.48 % ( he ansi i i y g amma o saying). This is ollowed by exis en ial a a ound 6.32 % ( he ansi i i y g amma o exis ing). Beha iou al is he mino p ocess ype in e ms o equency a a ound 0.40 % ( he ansi i i y g amma o beha ing). The high selec ion o ma e ial p ocesses in his esea ch is highly mo i a ed, as he alisman ad e isemen s a e conce ned wi h doing a commodi y ansac ion  pu chasing goods-o -se ices. Rela ional p ocesses a e he second mos equen p ocess ypes. This ela ional selec ion is mo i a ed since one o he s a egic goals o ad e isemen copy w i e s is o gain he po en ial cus ome ’s a en ion and in e es by a ousing he cus ome ’s desi e which leads o desi able ac ion  leading he cus ome o pu chase he ad e ised p oduc . A ousing desi e can be achie ed by consis en ly desc ibing p oduc ea u es, unc ions, e alua ion, and ad an ages (Leech 1966; F ies 1993; Unge e 2004). The men al p ocesses a e p o iled as he hi d coun in he p ocess selec ion. This selec ion is s ongly mo i a ed as he alisman ad e isemen s p o ide pe suasi e in o ma ion in ela ion o a success ul indi idual’s sensing p ocesses ela ed o he magic powe o ad e ised alismans (e.g., belie , disbelie , espec , dis espec , knowing, hinking, and ealizing). This pe suasi e message is achie ed by con inuously p o oking he indi idual’s belie be o e and a e becoming an owne and wo shipping he ad e ised alisman. The men al p ocesses (especially cogni i e men al p ocesses) a e mainly ound in he gene ic s age o Expe ience. They a e elabo a ed in o mula passages, o example: 18 (1) Tex 2: “Nok Khum Ma Rum calling o p ospe i ies” Whoe e does belie e on his kind o s o y (supe s i ious s o y), i is okay o belie e ha . Whoe e does no belie e, i is also okay. The e is no one s opping you om belie o disbelie on ha s o y. Bu my whole amily does belie e on his s o y. (2) Tex 8: “Yod Ke o Luang Pho Khun Pa i su ho” Whoe e does belie e, i is okay. Whoe e does no belie e, i is does no ma e o bo he me ( alisman’s belie e ). Bu , I do belie e i . (3) Tex 10: “Fish calling o p ospe i ies” This kind o s o y is supe s i ious. Whoe e does belie e o disbelie e. I is up o indi idual’s belie . Whoe e does no belie e, one should no be dis espec ul o he alisman. (4) Tex 12: “Nangkhwak KhwakSap Ma Rum Khwak Sap” Whoe e does no belie e his s o y (s o y o an indi idual’s success ul expe ience), one has o belie e. One canno be dis espec ul o he supe s i ious s o y. Ve bal p ocesses a e coun ed as he ou h ank o equency. They a e used by success ul alisman belie e s who na a e hei pe sonal mi acle expe iences and a e exploi ed by epo e s who epo and in e iew on he success ul expe iences. In explo ing ansi i i y p o ile, i is in e es ing o explo e ela i e equencies o he in e sec ion o simul aneous sys ems (bo h o igina ing om he same and he di e en me a unc ions) (See Ma hiessen 1999). The ollowing sec ion deals wi h an in e sec ion o wo di e en me a unc ions  in e pe sonal and expe ien ial. 9.3 I NTERSECTION OF SIMULTANEOUS SYSTEMS : C LAUSE ( INTERPERSONAL AND EXPERIENTIAL ): POLARITY AND PROCESS TYPE POLARITY and PROCESS TYPE a e sys ems o igina ing om di e en me a unc ions: he in e pe sonal and expe ien ial me a unc ions espec i ely. The ela i e equencies o he ins an ia ion o e ms in POLARITY and PROCESS TYPE a e shown in Figu e 9. 19 Figu e 9: Sys em o in e pe sonal and expe ien ial clauses: POLARITY and PROCESS TYPE [N = 2,518 ins ances] In gene al, he a io o posi i e o nega i e pola i y a ies ac oss he p ocess ypes. This a ia ion is p edic able. This sample suppo s a skewed coun o quan i a i e endencies ha ing a 0.9 o 0.1 a io o he wo- e m sys em (Halliday 1999a, 1999b, 1992). In his skewed a io, posi i e is he unma ked choice ac oss di e en p ocess ypes and nega i e is he ma ked one. The nega i e e m is ealized by a nega i e ma ke maj3. In a de ailed in es iga ion, nega i e a ies om he lowes p opo ion o 0 % in beha iou al clauses and a highe p opo ion o 35.2% in men al clauses. The highes nega i e selec ion o men al p ocesses is mo i a ed, as he nega i e men al choices a e used o exp ess he alisman belie e ’s nega i e a i ude and ha dship. The selec ion o nega i e men al p ocesses is equen ly ound be o e he alisman belie e pu chases he ad e ised alisman. A e pu chasing and wo shipping, he alisman belie e ’s a i ude becomes posi i e. Thei li es ha e changed in a posi i e way. Tha is, he ha dship and li e di icul ies a e elie ed. The scale o nega i i y ac oss p ocess ypes is shown below. I anges om he lowes nega i e a ac ion o he highes one. Low nega i e a ac ion High nega ion a ac ion beha iou al [0 %] > exis en ial [3.9%] > e bal [6.2%] > ma e ial [24.0%] > ela ional [30.7%] > men al [35.2%] 20 9.4 C IRCUMSTANTIAL TRANSITIVITY PROFILE OF THE TALISMAN ADVERTISEMENTS : PROCESS TYPE AND CIRCUMSTANTIATION The sys ems o AGENCY and PROCESS TYPE cons ue he nuclea domain o a quan um o change. This nucleus can be augmen ed by ci cums an ial TRANSITIVITY (CIRCUMSTANTIATION). Table 8 shows he in e sec ion o PROCESS TYPE wi h CIRCUMSTANTIATION. Table 8: In e sec ion o PROCESS TYPE and CIRCUMSTANTIATION in he wen y alisman ad e isemen s Doing Sensing Being # % Ci cums ance Type Ci cums ance sub-ca ego y ma e ial # beha iou al # men al # e bal # ela ional # exis en ial # ime 76 0 14 11 33 10 144 21.40 loca i e place 131 0 15 6 36 11 199 29.57 du a ion 23 0 4 6 3 0 36 5.35 dis ance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ex en equency 10 0 1 1 1 1 14 2.08 means 8 0 0 0 1 0 9 1.34 quali y 84 0 28 13 45 26 196 29.12 compa ison 3 0 0 1 3 0 7 1.04 manne deg ee 3 0 1 0 1 0 5 0.74 eason 5 0 0 1 3 0 9 1.34 pu pose 6 0 0 1 6 0 13 1.93 cause behal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 condi ion 12 0 3 1 2 1 19 2.82 con ingency concession 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 accompanimen comi a i e 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.30 guise 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ole p oduc 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 sou ce 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 angle iew poin 1 0 0 0 2 0 3 0.44 ma e ma e 0 0 13 4 0 0 17 2.53 To al # o ci cums ance 364 0 79 45 136 49 673 100% To al % o ci cums ance 54.09 0 11.74 6.68 20.21 7.28 100% 100% Table 8 shows ha he e a e clea ly a o ed and non- a o ed combina ions o ci cums an ial ypes and p ocess ypes. Fo example, he combina ion o ma e ial and empo al loca ion and spa ial loca ion a e clea ly a ou ed. Ma e is a ac ed o men al and e bal p ocesses. Mo eo e , he dis ibu ion o some ci cums an ial ypes seems o a y ac oss p ocess ype. Fo example, ci cums ance o quali a i e Manne is mo e s ongly a ac ed o ma e ial clauses (98 ins ances). This is ollowed by ela ional clauses (45 ins ances), which is in u n ollowed by men al clauses (28 ins ances), and exis en ial clauses a abou equal measu e (26 ins ances). Ve bal clause (13 ins ances) and “beha iou al” clauses (0 ins ance) ha e mino coun s in e ms o equency. 21 The ela i e equencies o ci cums an ial selec ions a y ac oss p ocess ypes. Fo example: ma e ial: place > ime > quali y > du a ion > condi ion > equency > … beha iou al: none > none > none > … men al: quali y > place > ime > ma e > du a ion > condi ion > … e bal: quali y > ime > place / du a ion > ma e > … ela ional: quali y > place > ime > pu pose > du a ion / compa ison > … exis en ial: quali y > place > ime > equency /condi ion > … 10 C ONCLUSION In his esea ch, ad e isemen s ha e been explo ed as a ype o ad e ising discou se, based on he selec ed co pus o wen y alisman ad e isemen s. Tex s a e cons uc ed as an ongoing p ocess o selec ion o ea u es in simul aneous sys ems. These selec ions c ea e pa e ns as he ex un olds  logogene ic pa e ns (Ma hiessen 2002). By acking he local selec ions, he pa e n o lexicog amma in alisman ad e isemen s un old in he ex s. Wi hin he dimension o STRATIFICATION, h ee s a a o alisman ad e isemen s a e in es iga ed  con ex , seman ics, and lexicog amma . A he con ex ual s a um, he con ex ual alues (i.e., Field, Teno , and Mode alues) a e discussed. Wi hin his con ex ual le el, he gene ic s uc u e po en ial o he wen y alisman ad e isemen s is in es iga ed. Based on Hasan’s pionee ing wo k on he con ex ual con igu a ion, he wen y alisman ad e isemen s a e analysed in o eigh een gene ic s ages. A he seman ics s a um, all eigh een gene ic s ages a e ealized by seman ic p ope ies. The seman ic p ope ies comp ise nuclea and elabo a i e seman ic epe oi es. The alisman ad e isemen s ealized as sys ems o meaning a e in u n ealized by sys ems o wo dings  lexicog amma . The lexicog amma s a um is me a unc ionally explo ed. The analysis is based on expe ien ial clause g amma  he sys em o TRANSITIVITY. Expe ien ially, human expe ience is cons ued by di e en p ocess ypes in ol ing di e en pa icipan oles. The indings e eal ha ma e ial p ocesses a e selec ed mo e equen ly han any o he p ocess ypes (42.61 %). This sugges s ha hese alisman ad e isemen s a e la gely conce ned wi h ac ions and e en s. Rela ional p ocesses a e selec ed in he second ank o equency (28.08 %). They exp ess p oduc a ibu es, p oduc p oduc ion and habi ude o belie e s. This cu en pape is conce ned wi h he o e all ansi i i y selec ions o alisman ad e isemen s. The e emain o he a enues o u he esea ches. Fu he mo e, wi hin he co pus o alisman ad e isemen s i is in e es ing o explo e he ansi i i y p o iles o di e en s ages which make up his pa icula ex ype. I can be hypo hesized ha di e en s ages a e ypically ea u ed by di e en a ou i e p ocess ypes (Ma hiessen 1995: 360). 22 In e ms o ad e ising s a egies, ad e ising copy w i e s exploi some key p inciples o c ea e and ecommend goods-o -se ices o p ospec i e cus ome s. Some key p inciples o success ul ad e isemen s a e ecommended as ollows (based on Leech 1966: 27; Toolan 1988: 53; F ies 1993): • G ab po en ial cus ome s’ a en ion and in e es by exp essing in Cap u e, Hook and Showcase s ages; • Sus ain po en ial cus ome s’ a en ion and in e es by elabo a ing on p oduc a ibu es, alues, unc ions; • Rein o ce memo abili y by using epe i ion s a egy. The alisman-name is selec ed epea edly as bo h in unma ked Theme posi ion and New-Rheme posi ion (F ies 1993); • Con ey selling powe by p o oking po en ial cus ome s owa ds he igh eac ion (i.e., buy, con ac , ind / phone o mo e in o ma ion, and pay); • Ca e ully p esen p oduc ea u es, unc ions, and e alua ions h ough Thema ic in o ma ion and N-Rhema ic in o ma ion (F ies 1993). This cu en s udy con ibu es o ad e isemen copy w i ing o his pa icula ad e isemen by sugges ing w i ing s a egies as ollows: • P o ide examples o success ul expe iences wi h speci ic de ails o he belie e s (a leas one pe sonal expe ience). Those expe iences p omo e and p o oke oppo uni ies o belie e s o expe ience he magical powe by buying, ying on, o wo shipping he ad e ised alisman. • Emphasise on alisman a ibu es and unc ions bo h physical (how i is p oduced, i s unc ion) and spi i ual (how i s supe na u al powe changes one’s li e: mi aculous success). Ad e ising is an excellen example o he a o pe suasion. In o de o achie e he desi ed ou come, he key unc ions o ad e ising a e o in o m abou a p oduc ’s cha ac e is ics, o in luence eade /lis ene a i udes ( o pu chase he p omo ed p oduc ), and o a ac and sus ain eade /lis ene needs and a en ion in sys emic ways (Toolan 1988). R EFERENCES Bibe , Douglas. 1989. A ypology o English ex s. Linguis ics 27: 3-43. Ca a el, Alice, James R. Ma in and Ch is ian M.I.M. Ma hiessen 2004. In oduc ion: sys emic unc ional ypology. In Ca a el, Alice, James R. Ma in and Ch is ian M.I.M. Ma hiessen (eds.), Language ypology: a unc ional pe spec i e. Ams e dam: John Benjamins. 23 Cook, Guy. 1992. The Discou se o Ad e ising. New Yo k: Rou ledge. Dijk, Teun A. an. 1972. Founda ions o Typologies o Tex s. Semio ica 4(6). 297-323. Dye , Gillian. 1988. Ad e ising as Communica ion. London: Rou ledge. Eggins, S. and Di Slade. 1997. Analysing casual con e sa ion. London: Cassell. Fahey, Rhondda. 2005. Language o ad e ising. BBA 316’s handou . MS. Depa men o Linguis ics, Macqua ie Uni e si y Feez, Susan. 1995. Gen es in he seconda y school. MS. F ies, Pe e H. 1993. In o ma ion low in w i en ad e ising. In James Ala is (ed.), Language, communica ion and social meaning. Washing on, D.C.: Geo ge own Uni e si y P ess. 336-352. Halliday, M.A.K. 1961. Ca ego ies o he heo y o g amma . Wo d 17(3). 241-292. Halliday, M.A.K. 1977. Tex as seman ic choice in social con ex s. In Teun A. an Dijk and Jonoss Pe o i (eds.), G amma s and desc ip ions: s udies in ex Theo y and ex analysis. Be lin: Wal e de G ug e . 176-225. Halliday, M.A.K. 1978. Language as social semio ic: he social in e p e a ion o language and meaning. London: Edwa d A nold. Halliday, M.A.K. 1984. Linguis ics in he uni e si y: he ques ion o social accoun abili y. In James E. Copeland (ed.), New di ec ions in linguis ics and semio ics. Hous on, Texas: Rice Uni e si y S udies. 51-67. Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. Sys emic backg ound. In J.D. Benson and W. G ea es (eds.), Sys emic pe spec i es on discou se. Volume.1. No wood, NJ: Ablex. Halliday, M.A.K. 1991a. Co pus s udies and p obabilis ic g amma . In Ka in Aijme and Beng Al enbe g (eds.), English co pus linguis ics: s udies in honou o Jan S a ik. London: Longman. 33-44. Halliday, M.A.K. 1991b. Towa ds p obabilis ic in e p e a ions. In Ven ola, Eija (ed.), T ends in Linguis ics S udies and Monog aphs 55: Func ional and Sys emic Linguis ics App oaches and Uses. Be lin: Mou on de G uy e . Halliday, M.A.K. 1992. Language as sys em and language as ins ance: The co pus as a heo e ical cons uc . In S a ik, Jan (ed.). Di ec ions in Co pus Linguis ics. P oceedings o Nobel Symposium 82, S ockholm, 4-8 Augus 1991, Be lin: Mou on de G uy e . 61-77. Halliday, M. A. K. and Ch is ian M.I.M. Ma hiessen. 1999. Cons uing expe ience h ough meaning: a language-based app oach o cogni ion. London: Cassell. Halliday, M.A.K. and Ch is ian M.I.M. Ma hiessen. 3 d . 2004. An in oduc ion o unc ional g amma . London: Edwa d A nold. Halliday, M.A.K. and Ruquiya Hasan. 1985. Language, con ex , and ex : aspec s o language in social-semio ic pe spec i e. Geelong, Vic o ia: Deakin Uni e si y P ess. (Language and Lea ning Se ies). Hasan, Ruquiya. 1978. Tex in he sys emic- unc ional model. In Wol gang. D essle . (ed.), Cu en ends in ex linguis ics. Be lin: de G uy e . 228-246. Hasan, Ruquiya. 1979. On he no ion o ex . In Pe o_ i, J.S. (ed.), Tex s. sen ence: Basic ques ions o ex linguis ics. (Pape s in Tex linguis ics 20.2). Buske: Hambu g. Hasan, Ruquiya. 1984a. Cohe ence and cohesi e ha mony. In James Flood (ed.), Unde s anding eading comp ehension: cogni ion, language and he s uc u e o p ose. Newa k: In e na ional Reading Associa ion. 24 Hasan, Ruquiya. 1984b/1996. The nu se y ales as a gen e. No ingham Linguis ic Ci cula . 13: 71-102. (Rep in ed in Hasan, Ruquiya. 1996. Ways o saying: ways o meaning. London: Cassell.) Hasan, Ruquiya. 1984c. The s uc u e o he nu se y ale: an essay in ex ypology. In L. Co e i (ed.), Linguis ica Tes uale. Rome: Bulzoni. Hass, Ma y. R. 1964. Thai-English S uden ’s Dic iona y. Cali o nia: S and o d Uni e si y P ess. Leech, G. 1966. English in ad e ising. London: Longman. Longac e, Robe E. 1974. Na a i e e sus o he discou se gen e. In R.M. B end (ed.), Ad ances in Tagmemics. Ams e dam: No h- Holland. 357-367. Ma in, James R. 1992. English Tex : Sys em and S uc u e. John Benjamins: Ams e dam. Ma hiessen, Ch is ian M.I.M. 1988. O ganizing ex : he o ical schemas and gene ic s uc u e po en ial. MS. Uni e si y o Sydney. Ma hiessen, Ch is ian M.I.M. 1992. In e p e ing he ex ual me a unc ion. In Ma in Da ies and Louise Ra elli (eds.), Ad ances in sys emic linguis ics: ecen heo y and p ac ice. London: Pin e . Ma hiessen, Ch is ian M.I.M. 1993. Regis e in he ound: di e si y in a uni ied heo y o egis e analysis. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Regis e analysis: heo y and p ac ice. London: Pin e . 221-291. Ma hiessen, Ch is ian M.I.M. 1995. Lexicog amma ical ca og aphy: English sys ems. Tokyo: In e na ional Language Sciences Publishe s. Ma hiessen, Ch is ian M.I.M. 1999. The sys em o ansi i i y: an explo a o y s udy o ex -based p o iles. Func ions o Language 6(1). 1-51. Ma hiessen, Ch is ian M.I.M. 2000. Na a i e egis e  lexicog amma ical pa e ns. MS. Depa men o Linguis ics, Macqua ie Uni e si y. Ma hiessen, Ch is ian M.I.M. 2001. No es on sys emic unc ional esea ch. MS. Depa men o Linguis ics, Macqua ie Uni e si y. Ma hiessen, Ch is ian M.I.M. 2002. Lexicog amma in discou se de elopmen : logogene ic pa e ns o wo ding. In Guowen, H. and W. Zongyan (eds.), Discou se and language unc ions. Shanghai: Fo eign Language and Resea ch P ess. 91-126 Ma hiessen, Ch is ian M.I.M. 2003. Expe ien ial clause g amma : TRANSITIVITY. MS. Depa men o Linguis ics, Macqua ie Uni e si y Ma hiessen, Ch is ian, M.I.M. 2004. F equency p o iles o some basic g amma ical sys ems: an in e im epo . In Huns on, Susan., Geo Thompson (eds.), Sys em and co pus: explo ing connec ions. London: Equinox. (Pape p esen ed a The 29 h Sys emic Func ional Linguis ics Cong ess: Sys emic Linguis ics and he Co pus a The Uni e si y o Li e pool, 15-19 July 2002.) Ma hiessen, Ch is ian M.I.M. n.d. Mic o-gene ic s ages  ealiza ion. MS. Depa men o Linguis ics, Macqua ie Uni e si y Ma hiessen, Ch is ian, M.I.M., Kazuhi o Te uya & Canzhong Wu. o hcoming. Tex ypology: egis e s in si ua ion ypes and con ex ual s uc u es. (d a 2004). Mi chell, T.F. 1957. The language o buying and selling in Cy enaica: a si ua ional s a emen . Hespe is. 26. 31-71. Rep in ed in T.F. Mi chell. 1975. P inciples o Neo- Fi hian Linguis ics. London: Longman. 167-200. 25 Nilsen, Don L. F. 1993. Language plays in ad e ising: linguis ic in en ion in p oduc naming. In James Ala is (ed.), Language, communica ion and social meaning. Washing on, D.C.: Geo ge own Uni e si y P ess. 272-286. O’Ba , William M. 1993. Language and ad e ising. In James Ala is (ed.), Language, communica ion and social meaning. Washing on, D.C.: Geo ge own Uni e si y P ess. 272-286. Pa pong, Pa ama. 2006. A Sys emic Func ional In e p e a ion o Thai G amma : An Analysis o Na a i e Discou se. Ph.D. hesis, Macqua ie Uni e si y. Plum, Guen e A. 1998. Tex ual and con ex ual condi ioning in spoken English: a gen e-based app oach. Monog aphs in Sys emic Linguis ics. Numbe 10. Depa men o English S udies: Uni e si y o No ingham Sinclai , John McH. 1987. Colloca ion: a p og ess epo . In R S eele and T. Th eadgold (eds.), Language opics: essays in honou o Michael Halliday. Ams e dam: John Benjamins. 319-332. Toolan, Michael. 1988. The language o p ess ad e ising. In Ghadessy (ed.), Regis e s o w i en English: si ua ional ac o s and linguis ic ea u es. London: Pin e (Open Linguis ic Se ies). pp. 52-65. Unge e , F ied ich. 2004. Ads as news s o ies, news s o ies as ads: The in e ac ion o ad e isemen s and edi o ial ex s in newspape s. Tex . 24(3). 307-328. U e, Jean 1989. Tex Typology. MS. U e, Jean and Je ey Ellis. 1977. Regis e in desc ip i e linguis ics and linguis ic sociology. In Osca U ibe-Villegas (ed.), Issues in Sociolinguis ics. The Hague: Mou on Publishe s. 197-243. Ves e gaa d, To ben and Sch Οde , Kim 1985. The language o ad e ising. Ox o d, Blackwell. Vi anen, Tuija. 1992. Issues o ex ypology: na a i e  a ‘basic’ ype o ex ?. Tex . 12(2). 293-310. Pa ama Jo Pa pong Ins i u e o Language and Cul u e o Ru al De elopmen Mahidol Uni e si y Nakho n Pa hom 73170 Thailand [email protected]. h