scieee Open visual document viewer

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathways for Aesthetic Breast Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study on Patient-Reported Outcomes

Stahl, Stéphane,Santos Stahl, Adelana,Feng, You-Shan,Estler, Arne,Buiculescu, Florian,Seabra Robalo Gomes Jorge, Ana Cristina

Abstract

Background Patients’ expectations of an anticipated timeline of recovery and fear of anesthesia in aesthetic breast surgery have not been studied. Objective This study aims to assess patient anxiety, expectations, and satisfaction after Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathways for aesthetic breast surgery and the progress of postoperative recovery. Materials and methods All consecutive patients who underwent aesthetic breast surgery between April 2021 and August 2022 were included in this single-center prospective cohort study. The ERAS protocol consists of more than 20 individual measures in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative period. Epidemiological data, expectations, and recovery were systematically assessed with standardized self-assessment questionnaires, including the International Pain Outcome Questionnaire (IPO), the BREAST-Q or BODY-Q, and data collection forms. Results In total, 48 patients with a median of 30 years of age were included. Patients returned to most daily activities within 5 days. Eighty-eight percent of patients were able to accomplish daily activities sooner than expected. The time of return to normal daily activities was similar across all procedure types. There was no statistically significant difference regarding postoperative satisfaction between patients who recovered slower (12%) and patients who recovered as fast or faster (88%) than anticipated (p=0.180). Patients reporting fear of anesthesia in the form of conscious sedation significantly diminished from 17 to 4% postoperatively (p<0.001). Conclusion Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathways for aesthetic breast surgery are associated with rapid recovery and high patient satisfaction. This survey study provides valuable insight into patients’ concerns and perspectives that may be implemented in patient education and consultations to improve patient satisfaction following aesthetic treatments. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Full text

ORIGINAL ARTICLE BREAST SURGERY Enhanced Reco e y A e Su ge y (ERAS) Pa hways o Aes he ic B eas Su ge y: A P ospec i e Coho S udy on Pa ien -Repo ed Ou comes S e ´phane S ahl 1 •Adelana San os S ahl 1 •You-Shan Feng 2 •A ne Es le 3 • Flo ian Buiculescu 1 •Ana C is ina Seab a Robalo Gomes Jo ge 4 Recei ed: 30 Ma ch 2023 / Accep ed: 23 Ap il 2023 The Au ho (s) 2023 Abs ac Backg ound Pa ien s’ expec a ions o an an icipa ed imeline o eco e y and ea o anes hesia in aes he ic b eas su ge y ha e no been s udied. Objec i e This s udy aims o assess pa ien anxie y, expec a ions, and sa is ac ion a e Enhanced Reco e y a e Su ge y (ERAS) pa hways o aes he ic b eas su ge y and he p og ess o pos ope a i e eco e y. Ma e ials and me hods All consecu i e pa ien s who unde wen aes he ic b eas su ge y be ween Ap il 2021 and Augus 2022 we e included in his single-cen e p ospec- i e coho s udy. The ERAS p o ocol consis s o mo e han 20 indi idual measu es in he p e-, in a-, and pos ope a i e pe iod. Epidemiological da a, expec a ions, and eco e y we e sys ema ically assessed wi h s anda dized sel - assessmen ques ionnai es, including he In e na ional Pain Ou come Ques ionnai e (IPO), he BREAST-Q o BODY- Q, and da a collec ion o ms. Resul s In o al, 48 pa ien s wi h a median o 30 yea s o age we e included. Pa ien s e u ned o mos daily ac i i ies wi hin 5 days. Eigh y-eigh pe cen o pa ien s we e able o accomplish daily ac i i ies soone han expec ed. The ime o e u n o no mal daily ac i i ies was simila ac oss all p ocedu e ypes. The e was no s a is ically signi ican di - e ence ega ding pos ope a i e sa is ac ion be ween pa ien s who eco e ed slowe (12%) and pa ien s who eco e ed as as o as e (88%) han an icipa ed (p=0.180). Pa ien s epo ing ea o anes hesia in he o m o conscious seda ion signi ican ly diminished om 17 o 4% pos ope a i ely (p 0.001). Conclusion Enhanced Reco e y a e Su ge y (ERAS) pa hways o aes he ic b eas su ge y a e associa ed wi h apid eco e y and high pa ien sa is ac ion. This su ey s udy p o ides aluable insigh in o pa ien s’ conce ns and pe spec i es ha may be implemen ed in pa ien educa ion and consul a ions o imp o e pa ien sa is ac ion ollowing aes he ic ea men s. Le el o E idence IV This jou nal equi es ha au ho s assign a le el o e idence o each a icle. Fo a ull desc ip ion o hese E idence-Based Medicine a ings, please e e o he Table o Con en s o he online Ins uc ions o Au ho s www.sp inge .com/00266. Keywo ds Fas - ack su ge y Fas eco e y su ge y  Enhanced eco e y su ge y B eas augmen a ion ERAS  Ou pa ien su ge y In oduc ion The e is an e e -inc easing p essu e o pe o m su ge ies in he ambula o y se ing, p ima ily o imp o e cos -e ec- i eness. This end has been ein o ced by he COVID-19 pandemic [1]. Many s udies ha e documen ed he sa e y and easibili y o ambula o y b eas su ge y in selec ed pa ien s. Mos o hese s udies ha e ocused on ou comes, namely complica ions and eadmissions [2,3]. &Ana C is ina Seab a Robalo Gomes Jo ge [email p o ec ed] 1 Cen e Plas p i a e p ac ice, Bahnho s aße 36, 66111 Saa b u ¨cken, Ge many 2 Ins i u e o Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biome ics, Medical Uni e si y o Tu ¨bingen, Tu ¨bingen, Ge many 3 Depa men o Diagnos ic and In e en ional Radiology, Uni e si y Hospi al o Tu ¨bingen, Tu ¨bingen, Ge many 4 Depa men o Gene al, Visce al, Vascula , and Pedia ic Su ge y, Saa land Uni e si y Hospi al, Ki be ge S aße, 66421 Hombu g/Saa , Saa land, Ge many 123 Aes h Plas Su g h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s00266-023-03392-1 Unde s anding ac o s ha enhance eco e y and pa ien com o , and inc ease pa ien sa is ac ion is a equisi e o main aining a success ul p ac ice. Enhanced Reco e y a e Su ge y (ERAS), also known as as - ack su ge y (FTS), consis s o in e disciplina y mul imodal pe iope a i e in e en ions aimed o op imize he eco e y p ocess, including educing hospi al s ay o a oiding hospi aliza- ion. The bene i s o ERAS p o ocols ha e been s udied in a ious su gical subspecial ies [4]. Al hough esea ch aiming a educing opioid consump ion and hospi al s ay da es o he 1990s, he e m ‘‘enhanced eco e y a e su ge y (ERAS)’’ has no gained much a en ion in cos- me ic plas ic su ge y [5]. Li le esea ch has been done ega ding unc ional eco e y o pa ien s a e aes he ic b eas su ge y [6]. Pa ien sa is ac ion a e su ge y co ela es wi h he ul illmen o pa ien s’ p esu gical expec a ions [7]. Un e- alis ic expec a ions p edic an unsa is ac o y ou come [8]. Pa ien s belie e ha anes hesia and eco e y a e ela i ely simple and, he e o e, es ic ion o ac i i ies a e aes he ic su ge y is no necessa y [9,10]. Di e gence be ween ac ual expe ience and expec a ions impac s ea men adhe ence and he pa ien s’ sa is ac ion [11]. Only one s udy exam- ining pa ien sa is ac ion wi h pos ope a i e eco e y was iden i ied in a sys ema ic e iew o pa ien - epo ed ou - comes ollowing cosme ic su ge y [12]. This gap o knowledge may lead physicians o unde alue he aspec s o eco e ing. This s udy’s objec i e is o in es iga e a) pa ien s’ expec a ions abou eco e y imelines as well as conce ns be o e unde going aes he ic b eas su ge ies wi hou gen- e al anes hesia and b) o e alua e eco e y and sa is ac ion a e enhanced ERAS pa hways o aes he ic b eas su ge y. Ma e ial and Me hods Pa ien s The local E hics Commi ee ga e hei pe mission o his p ospec i e s udy (p ojec no. 144/21). In o med consen o p ospec i e analysis was ob ained. All consecu i e pa ien s who unde wen aes he ic b eas su ge y om Ap il 2021 o Augus 2022 we e included in his s udy. Unde age pa ien s and pa ien s equi ing e ision su ge ies wi hin he i s week we e excluded, as we e pa ien s wi h incomple e sel -assessmen ques ionnai es o incomple e clinical s udy epo s. The ERAS p o ocol and anes hesia was pe o med as p e iously desc ibed by he au ho s [13]. All pa ien s ecei ed 1000 mg ace aminophen and 1000 mg anexamic acid PO 2 h be o e su ge y, as well as dexame hasone 4 mg IV be o e s a ing he su ge y (Table 1). The au ho s desc ibed p eope a i e counseling explici ly in p e iously published wo k [13]. Pa ien s engaged in minimal wo k- ela ed physical ac i i y and we e ad ised o ake 7 days o wo k. Re u n o mode a e ae obic physical ac i i y o s enuous a m wo kou was discou aged be o e he i h pos ope a i e week. Comp ehensi e pe iope a i e ins uc ions we e a ached o he in o med consen o m and sen ia e-mail be o e su ge y. Su ge y and Loco egional Anes hesia All in e cos al blocks we e pe o med wi h opi acaine 0.375%, 4 mg o dexame hasone, and epineph ine (1:100.000). Immedia ely a e seda ion, he su geon injec ed 5 ml in he subcos al egion o in e cos al block be ween he hi d and he se en h ibs in a s anda d ashion [14]. Fo hemos asis and local anes hesia, lidocaine 0.1% wi h epineph ine (1:500.000) was injec ed in o he incision si es (Table 1), obse ing p e iously desc ibed maximum dosages o 28 mg/kg [15]. Ten minu es a e su ge y, pa ien s we e allowed o d ink and, in he absence o nausea, o ea a e wa d. Pa ien s we e gi en pe mission o discha ge a e su ge y i hey ole a ed ood, could u ina e, walk alone, had no unbea able pain, and had no nausea. Pa ien s we e eques ed o ha e he assis ance o a ca e- gi e a home on he i s nigh . Pa ien s ecei ed a dis- cha ge le e including pos ope a i e ins uc ions, ollow- up appoin men s, and he su geons’ cell phone numbe . The su geons made a pos ope a i e ollow-up phone call la e he same day. Ques ionnai es and Clinical S udy Repo s Clinical s udy epo s we e designed in ol ing all membe s o he eam as easy- o-use da a collec ion o ms wi h su - icien and unambiguous da a. Sa is ac ion wi h he ope - a i e esul was assessed wi h he BREAST-Q Augmen a ion, BREAST-Q Reduc ion/Mas opexy, o BODY-Q Ches module. Anxie y and sa is ac ion ega d- ing anes hesia we e assessed wi h 5 i ems om he ali- da ed In e na ional Pain Ou come Ques ionnai e (IPO) [16]. I ems om he Wo ld Heal h O ganiza ion (WHO) In e na ional Classi ica ion o Func ioning, Disabili y, and Heal h (ICF) we e chosen based on expe opinions and li e a u e esea ch [17,18]. The de elopmen o he ques- ionnai e has been desc ibed elsewhe e [13]. P ima y and seconda y ou come pa ame e s and iming o assessmen s we e: 123 Aes h Plas Su g •S uc u ed sel -assessmen ques ionnai e o demo- g aphic da a (gende , age, BMI, como bidi ies, medi- ca ion, and ASA sco e) comple ed be o e he i s consul a ion. •Pa ien - epo ed anxie ies and sa is ac ion ega ding anes hesia we e assessed by he IPO adminis e ed be o e and he day a e su ge y. •Pa ien - epo ed an icipa ed and ac ual eco e y in he i s pos ope a i e week was assessed wi h a sel -assessmen ques ionnai e be o e and 10 days a e su ge y. •Clinical s udy epo s wi h desc ip i e da a ega ding su ge y and anes hesia we e assessed on he ope a ion day by he ci cula ing nu se. •Pa ien - epo ed sa is ac ion wi h he ope a i e esul was assessed wi h he BREAST-Q Augmen a ion, BREAST-Q Reduc ion/Mas opexy o BODY-Q Ches module adminis e ed be o e he i s consul a ion and a leas 4 weeks pos ope a i ely. S a is ics Fo con inuous a iables wi h a no mal dis ibu ion, he mean and s anda d de ia ion (95% con idence in e al) a e p esen ed, whe eas o non-no mal da a, he median and in e qua ile ange. The s a is ical analyses we e ca ied ou wi h SPSS Ve sion 28 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). The co ela- ions be ween he a ious pa ame e s we e e alua ed using a Spea man co ela ion ma ix. PB0.05 was used o de ine sig- ni icance. We used he Wilcoxon ank-sum es o access g oup di e ences ac oss nonpa ame ic a iables. Resul s No pa ien d opped ou , wo we e excluded due o ope a- i e e ision, and one because o an incomple e ques ion- nai e. Fo y-eigh pa ien s wi h a median (IQR) o 30 Table 1 Anes he ic p o ocol Timing Anes he ic p o ocol P eope a i e A leas 2 appoin men s o comp ehensi e p eope a i e counseling Pe iope a i e ins uc ions a ached o he in o med consen o m and sen ia e-mail be o e su ge y Chlo hexidine showe ing on he day o su ge y Abs ain om solid ood 6 h be o e su ge y and clea liquids 2 h be o e su ge y 2 h be o e su ge y P eemp i e medica ion PO Ace aminophen 1000 mg T anexamic acid 1000 mg 15 min be o e su ge y Dexame hasone 4 mg IV P opo ol 5 mg/kg/h con inuous IV in usion pump Al en anil 0.5 mg IV be o e he in e cos al block and when pa ien esponds o pain s imuli In e cos al block 20 ml Ropi acaine 0.375%, 4 mg dexame hasone, and epineph ine (1:100.000) pe side 5 min be o e incision Local anes hesia 20–100 ml Lidocaine 0.1% wi h epineph ine (1:500.000) pe side In aope a i e S ess- educing s a egies (communica ion skills, backg ound music, p o essional and an icipa ing eam) No monopola elec ocau e y Wa ming blanke s and wa med umescen solu ions 48 h a e su ge y P eemp i e analgesia PO Ace aminophen 500 mg and Me amizole 500 mg al e na ely e e y 3 h P o e na a medica ion PO Tilidine/naloxone (50/4 mg) slow- elease able s Dimenhyd ina e 150 mg Pos ope a i e Ambula ion wi hin he i s hou Discha ge upon ole ance o ood, oiding, ambula ion wi hou assis ance, absence o in ole able pain, and absence o nausea Discha ge le e including pos ope a i e ins uc ions, ollow-up appoin men s Cellula elephone access o su geon Rou ine ollow-up call by he su geon 12 h a e he su ge y Knee-high comp ession s ockings o 10 days 123 Aes h Plas Su g (36–25) yea s o age we e included in his s udy. Eigh y- one pe cen o pa icipan s we e women, and he median (IQR) BMI was 24 (26–22) kg/m 2 . Como bidi ies, medi- ca ion, and ASA sco e a e p esen ed in Table 2. Nea ly hal o all su ge ies pe o med we e b eas aug- men a ions. B eas educ ions comp ised 35% and gynecomas ia abou 17% o all su gical in e en ions. Mas opexy was pe o med in 23% o pa ien s. Six y-nine pe cen o he su ge ies in ol ed addi ional p ocedu es such as liposuc ion. The median ope a ing ime was 02:12 (IQR: 02:49–01:36) hou s. Gynecomas ia co ec ions we e he sho es p ocedu es (median (IQR) 1:42 (1:52–1:09) hou s) and b eas educ ions he longes (median (IQR) 2:37 (2:58–1:52) hou s). The median (IQR) du a ion o b eas augmen a ion (including implan and a g a only, as well as hyb id b eas augmen a ion) was 2:14 (2:49–1:35) hou s. The a e age doses o adminis e ed al en anil and p opo ol we e, espec i ely, 0.31 lg/kg/min (minimum 0.02, maximum 0.83 lg/kg/min) and 4.43 mg/kg/h (mini- mum 2.27, maximum 6.21 mg/kg/h). Sa is ac ion wi h Ou come Ou esul s show a s a is ically signi ican inc ease in sa - is ac ion wi h b eas appea ance, as well as psychological and sexual well-being pos ope a i ely (Table 3). The e was an inc ease o 32 poin s (pB0.001) in pa ien sa is ac ion wi h b eas s, 18 poin s (pB0.001) in psychosocial well- being, and 10 poin s (pB0.001) in sexual well-being. Six y- wo pe cen o he esponden s epo ed 100% sa is ac ion wi h he ou come. App ehension Be o e and A e Anes hesia The g ea es p eope a i e conce ns o pa ien s we e epo ed using a 1 (no a all) o 5 ( e y s ong) a ing scale, and we obse ed a s a is ically signi ican educ ion pos - ope a i ely (pB0.001) in all ca ego ies (Fig. 1). In his se ies o ou pa ien aes he ic b eas su ge y unde seda ion, in e cos al block, and umescen anes hesia, mos pa ien s epo ed li le o no conce n abou anes hesia (median (IQR) 2 (2–1)) and abou eeling pain, nausea, o dyspnea (median (IQR) 2 (3–1)) be o e he p ocedu e. This app e- hension aded pos ope a i ely, and pa ien s e ealed ha - ing no ea (median (IQR) was 1 (2–1) in all ca ego ies). Mode a e, s ong, o e y s ong conce ns ega ding he anes hesia in he o m o conscious seda ion we e exp es- sed by 17% o pa ien s be o e he su ge y and only by 4% o he pa ien s a e he su ge y (Fig. 1). The e was no s a is ically signi ican co ela ion be ween p eope a i e anxie y and he dose o al en anil o be ween anxie y and he dose o p opo ol equi ed du ing su ge y ( s =-0.286) (Table 4). A powe analysis o es ima ion o he sample size which compa ed he p eop- e a i e and pos ope a i e conce ns showed ha he e ec size o ou s udy was ex emely la ge (powe 1.000, alpha 0.050). An icipa ed and Ac ual Reco e y Pa ien s e u ned o mos daily ac i i ies wi hin 5 days a e su ge y. Se en y-one pe cen o pa ien s we e able o pe o m mos daily ac i i ies soone han an icipa ed (p 0.001). Pa ien s we e able o wash hemsel es, climb s ai s, and go o walks s a is ically signi ican ly ea lie han an icipa ed (Table 5). The i s ac i i ies o be pe - o med we e walking a ound he house and climbing s ai s. Pa ien s we e able o d ess o und ess and go o a walk ou side on he ollowing day, and o cook a meal and Table 2 Demog aphic da a (age, BMI, como bidi ies, medica ion, ASA sco e) Age median (IQR) 30 (36–25) BMI median (IQR) 24 (26–22) kg/m2 Sex 39 (81%) women ASA I 34 (71%) ASA II 14 (29%) Como bidi ies* No como bidi ies: 40 (83%) 3 (6%) hy oid disease 2 (4%) a e ial hype ension 2 (4%) as hma 4 (8%) o he Medica ion* No medica ions: 34 (71%) 8 (17%) ho monal con acep ion 3 (6%) le o hy oxine 2 (4%) an ihype ensi e d ugs 5 (10%) o he P o ession (acco ding o he In e na ional S anda d Classi ica ion O Occupa ions, ISCO-08): 5 (10%) skill le el 1 17 (35%) skill le el 2 9 (19%) skill le el 3 7 (15%) skill le el 4 7 (15%) no applicable 3 (6%) no men ioned *The o al numbe does no sum o 48 (100%) 123 Aes h Plas Su g Table 3 BREAST-Q sco es and g ouping o di e en su gical echniques a e shown (Rasch ans o med sco e ange, 0–100). Highe sco es indica e highe sa is ac ion Su ge y ype To al Ques ionnai e Sa is ac ion wi h b eas s Psychosocial well-being Sexual well-being Sa is ac ion wi h ou come P eope a i e Pos ope a i e p alue** P eope a i e Pos ope a i e p alue** P eope a i e Pos ope a i e p alue** B eas augmen a ion 7 BREAST-Q 22 (33 –11) * 96 (100–82)* p= 0.001 39 (58 –33) 89 (100–71)* p= 0.003 40 (55 –20) 85 (100–68)* p= 0.001 100 (100– 89)* Augmen a ion mas opexy 1 Hyb id b eas augmen a ion 8 Implan exchange and mas opexy 1 Fa ans e 6 B eas educ ion and mas opexy 1 BREAST-Q Reduc ion/ Mas opexy 44 (65–17) 94 (100 – 88)* p= 0.002 39 (63–28) 94 (100–75)* p= 0.001 28 (39–15) 80 (100–69) p= 0.001 100 (100–81) Mas opexy and a ans e 4 Mas opexy 11 Implan emo al and mas opexy 1 Gynecomas ia 8 40 (95–15) 80 (89–13) p= 0.046 80 (89–13) To al/Mean 48 22 (50–16)* 94 (100–81)* p= 0.001 39 (59–31) 92 (100–75)* p= 0.001 33 (46–20) 83 (100–66) * p= 0.001 100 (100–84)* All sco es a e median (IQR) *Skewed a iable **Wilcoxon signed- ank es 123 Aes h Plas Su g showe on he second pos ope a i e day. Ac i i ies ha equi ed a longe eco e y ime o be accomplished we e doing housewo k and shopping (on he ou h pos ope a i e day) as well as d i ing a ca (on he i h day) (Table 5). The speed o eco e y did no co ela e wi h he ope - a ing ime ( s = 0.068, p=0.650) (Table 6). Nei he he al en anil no he p opo ol dosages co ela ed signi ican ly wi h he speed o eco e y (Table 6). Reco e y ime was simila ac oss ca ego ies, pa ien s needed a median (IQR) o 2 (2–1), 2(3–1), and 2 (2–1) days a e b eas augmen- a ion, educ ion, and gynecomas ia su ge ies, espec i ely, o e u n o no mal daily ac i i ies. Eigh y-eigh pe cen o pa ien s equi ed less ime o exac ly he same ime o eco e as an icipa ed p eope a i ely. Howe e , pa ien s wi h a slowe eco e y han an icipa ed we e no less sa - is ied wi h he aes he ic esul han pa ien s whose eco e y was as as o as e han an icipa ed ( ank-sum es : p=0.180). Powe analysis showed a powe o 0.983 o de ec a di e ence o alpha 0.05 be ween p eope a i e conce ns and pos ope a i e eco e y. Discussion We belie e his is he i s s udy o assess pa ien s’ anxie y, expec a ions, sa is ac ion, and ac ual eco e y ime a e ERAS pa hways o ou pa ien aes he ic b eas su ge y. Pa ien s e u ned o mos daily ac i i ies wi hin 5 days (Table 5). A e ospec i e s udy o da a collec ed be ween 1982 and 1990 sugges ed ha educ ion in su gical auma enabled pa ien s o li objec s up o 20 pounds, d i e a ca , e u n o wo k, and lie p one on hei b eas s 24 h a e submuscula b eas augmen a ion and gene al endo acheal anes hesia [19]. In a p ospec i e s udy o pa ien s a e submuscula b eas augmen a ions, pa ien s esumed d i - ing a e 5.4 ±4.1 (min: 1, max: 21) days a e su ge y. Howe e , no de ails we e gi en on he numbe and ype o Fig. 1 Pa ien - epo ed conce ns abou p eope a i e (ligh blue) as well as pos ope a i e (da k blue) anxie y and ea o anes hesia (Be o e: ‘‘When I hink abou he upcoming anes hesia, I am conce ned ha ...’’; A e : ‘‘I I needed his o m o anes hesia in he u u e, I would be conce ned ha ...’’). Scale 1: no a all; 2: a li le; 3: mode a ely; 4: s ongly; and 5: e y s ongly Table 4 Spea man’s co ela ion o p eope a i e conce ns and su gical and anes he ic pa ame e s Sa is ac ion wi h b eas s Psychosocial well-being Sexual well- being BMI P ocedu e du a ion (min) To al al en anil dose pe pa ien (lg/kg/min) To al p opo ol dose pe pa ien (mg/kg/h) P eope a i e anxie y and ea o anes hesia: s= 0.119 s= -0.179 s= -0.123 s= 0.152 s= -0.082 s= -0.090 s= -0.286 p= 0.435 p=0.283 p=0.462 p=0.303 p=0.578 p=0.609 p=0.095 123 Aes h Plas Su g Table 5 P eope a i e pa ien s’ expec a ions ega ding eco e y and e u n o no mal daily ac i i ies (‘‘Please es ima e you physical i ness in he i s 7 days a e su ge y.’’) and pos ope a i e assessmen o eco e y and e u n o no mal daily ac i i ies in he i s 7 days a e su ge y (‘‘When did you physically eel able o pe o m he ollowing ac i i ies.’’) Days a e su ge y on which he pa ien an icipa ed (be o e su ge y) and ac ually was able o pe o m he ollowing ac i i ies (a e su ge y): Scale: 0: Day o Su ge y; 1: 1s day; 2: 2nd day; 3: 3 d day; 4: 4 h day; 5: 5 h day; 6: 6 h day; 7: 7 h day; 8: A e 1 week To wash you sel (wi h showe plas e ) To d ess o und ess To walk in he house/apa men To climb s ai s (1 loo ) To go o a walk ou side (10 minu es) Su ge y ype P eope a i e Pos ope a i e p alue** P eope a i e Pos ope a i e p alue** P eope a i e Pos ope a i e p alue** P eope a i e Pos ope a i e p alue** P e ope a i e Pos ope a i e P alue** B eas Augmen a ion 2 (2 -1) 2 (3 -1) p=0.239 1 (2–0) 2 (2–0) * p=0.048 0 (1–0)* 1 (2–0)* p=0.615 1 (2–0) 1 (1–0)* p=0.302 2 (3–1) 2 (2–1) p=0.161 B eas educ ion/ Mas opexy 1 (3–1)* 2 (4–1) p=0.123 1 (2–0)* 1 (2–0)* p=0.230 0 (1–0)* 0 (1–0)* p=0.107 1 (2–0)* 0 (1–0)* p=0.048 1 (3–1)* 1 (2–0) p=0.088 Gynecomas ia 1 (3–1) 3 (3–1) p=0.063 1 (2–0) 1 (2–0)* p=0.518 1 (2–0)* 0 (1–0) p=0.705 1 (1–0) 0 (1–0) p=1.000 1 (3–0) 1 (1–0) p=1.000 To al/Median (IQR) 2 (3 - 1)* 2 (3 - 1) p=0.014 1 (2 –0)* 1 (2 –0)* p=0.323 0 (1–0)* 0 (1 - 0) * p=0.438 1 (2 - 0) * 0 (1 - 0) * p=0.042 2 (3 - 1) * 1(2-1) p=0.031 Days a e su ge y on which he pa ien an icipa ed (be o e su ge y) and ac ually was able o pe o m he ollowing ac i i ies (a e su ge y): Scale: 0: Day o Su ge y; 1: 1s day; 2: 2nd day; 3: 3 d day; 4: 4 h day; 5: 5 h day; 6: 6 h day; 7: 7 h day; 8: A e 1 week To cook (a small meal o you sel ) To do housewo k (washing clo hes, acuuming he loo ) To go shopping (g oce ies) To d i e a ca (up o 50 km) Su ge y ype P eope a i e Pos ope a i e P alue** P eope a i e Pos ope a i e P alue** P eope a i e Pos ope a i e P alue** P eope a i e Pos ope a i e P alue** B eas Augmen a ion 2 (4 -1) 2 (3 -1)* p=0.976 5 (7–3) 5 (5 - 4) p=0.961 5 (7 - 3) 4 (5 - 4) p=0.728 6 (8–3) 5 (8–2) p=1.000 B eas educ ion/Mas opexy 2 (5–1) * 2 (4–1) * p=0.112 4 (8–2) 4 (5–2) p=0.038 5 (8–3) 5 (6–2) p=0.181 7 (8–2) 6 (8–3) p=0.964 Gynecomas ia 1 (2–1)* 1 (2–1)* p=0.102 4 (7–2) 4 (5–3) p=0.671 4 (6–2) 3 (4–3)* p=0.317 2 (5–2)* 4 (8–3) p=0.139 To al/Median (IQR) 2 (4–1) * 2 (3–1)e p=0.659 4 (7–3) 4 (5–3) p=0.110 5 (7–3) 4 (5–3)* p=0.236 6 (8–2) 5 (8–3) p=0.472 All sco es a e median (IQR) *Skewed a iable **Wilcoxon signed- ank es 123 Aes h Plas Su g combined p ocedu es and he ype o anes hesia [6]. The li e a u e pe aining o exe cise a e b eas su ge y shows no subs an ial e idence o ad e se ou comes due o ea ly pos ope a i e exe cise compa ed wi h delayed exe cise [20]. Recen e idence sugges s ha exe cise, including bench p ess, 1 week a e b eas augmen a ion does no inc ease complica ion a es [21]. Ne e heless, addi ional s udies may be equi ed o de e mine he op imum isk– bene i a io be ween o e ly agg essi e and o e ly cau ious eco e y. Ou indings co obo a e ha wi h op imal pe iope a i e p o ocols complex su gical ope a ions can be pe o med in an ou pa ien se ing [22]. S udies sugges ing ha he ope a ion ime p edic s he i ness o discha ge do no conside he impac o gene al anes hesia on eco e y [23], al hough a co ela ion be ween he ype o anes hesia and he quali y o eco e y has been demons a ed [24,25]. Unde he s anda dized anes hesia p o ocol desc ibed he ein, he ange o ope a ing imes (min: 46 min; max: 293 min) did no co ela e wi h he eco e y ime wi hin he i s pos ope a i e week (Table 6). This may be explained by he o e all low doses o p opo ol and al en- anil and hei ela i ely sho elimina ion hal -li e (558 ± 218 and 275 ±94 minu es, espec i ely) [26]. Pa ien s equi ed a median (IQR) p opo ol dose o 4.97 (6.21–2.27) mg/kg/h, in con as o he concen a ions used in o al i. . anes hesia o 9 mg/kg/h as ini ial dose and 6 mg/kg/h as he main enance dose [27]. As o al en anil, he median (IQR) in usion a e was 0.33 (0.83–0.02) lg/ kg/min, as opposed o he dose used in o al i. . anes hesia o 100 o 240 lg/kg/min [27]. The highe doses o p opo ol and al en anil ypically adminis e ed in gene al anes hesia di icul eco e y, especially in he i s 48 h, and he e o e a e mo e likely o equi e inpa ien hospi aliza ion pos - ope a i ely. The au ho s ha e p e iously shown ha pa ien s a e aes he ic b eas su ge y acco ding o he ERAS p o ocol desc ibed he ein a e eco e ing soone han expec ed a e gene al su ge y (d inking, ea ing, and oiding wi hin a median (IQR) o 0:45 (1:19–0:25) h, discha ge wi hin a median o 2:40 (3:43–1:58) h [13]. The isk o h omboses in cosme ic su ge y, including b eas and ace su ge ies, abdominoplas ies, and liposuc- ions, is es ima ed a 0.9% and peeks a app oxima ely 1 week a e su ge y [28]. Ea ly mobiliza ion and eco e y a e decisi e o p e en h omboembolisms. Mos pa ien s in his s udy walked in hei house o apa men and climbed s ai s on he day o he su ge y, which would no be possible in a hospi al oom, especially a e gene al su ge y. A signi ican ly lowe incidence o h omboem- bolism has been obse ed in a la ge published se ies o pa ien s unde going elec i e plas ic su ge y unde o al in a enous anes hesia [29]. Discussion on he associa ion o h omboembolic e en s wi h ope a i e ime mus acknowledge he po en ially con ounding e ec o gene al anes hesia. Pain, nausea, and d owsiness a e he mos e- quen causes o delaying discha ge [30]. E idence has been p esen ed ha opioid-spa ing anes hesia imp o es eco e y wi hou comp omising pa ien sa e y and pain con ol [13,25]. Se en y-one pe cen o pa ien s equi ed as much ime o eco e as an icipa ed p eope a i ely o less. E idence has been p esen ed ha p eope a i e in o ma ion desc ib- ing he eco e y p ocess educes he leng h o hospi al s ay [31]. Well-in o med pa ien s p esen as e ime o ac i i y and eco e y [38], a e mo e sa is ied wi h hei o e all ou come [41], and consume ewe opioids [32]. Commu- nica ion gaps and un ealis ic expec a ions inc ease he isk o pos ope a i e complica ions [33]. Pa ien s p o ided wi h adequa e in o ma ion and de ails abou wha o expec ega ding he p ocess o ca e and eco e y a e mo e sa - is ied wi h hei o e all ou come [34]. We, he e o e, assume ha p o iding he in o ma ion desc ibed he ein du ing p eope a i e counseling can u he enhance eco e y, inc ease sa is ac ion, and educe opioid con- sump ion. Because o he amoun and impo ance o p e- ope a i e in o ma ion, we ecommend wo appoin men s o comp ehensi e counseling and he use p in ed and digi al o ma s. Since s ess and anxie y in luence pain pe cep ion, immune unc ion, and wound healing, he ERAS p o ocol included nume ous measu es o educe anxie y. S uc u ed ollow-up calls, 12 o 24 h a e ambula o y su ge y po en ially educes pa ien s’ sel - epo ed pain and anxie y, and imp o es sa e y and ou comes by inc easing compli- ance while educing he a eling imes, in as uc u e needs, and con agion isk du ing he COVID-19 pandemic Table 6 Co ela ion o eco e y and su gical and anes he ic pa ame e s Sa is ac ion wi h b eas s Psychosocial well-being Sexual well- being Sa is ac ion wi h ou come BMI P ocedu e du a ion (min) To al al en anil dose pe pa ien (lg/kg/ min) To al p opo ol dose pe pa ien (mg/kg/ h) Reco e y a e su ge y: s= -0.057 s= -0.023 s= -0.017 s= 0.025 s= 0.015 s= 0.068 s= 0.158 s= -0.121 p=0.708 p=0.890 p=0.912 p=0.935 p=0.920 p=0.650 p=0.372 p=0.496 123 Aes h Plas Su g [35–38]. Ha ing cellula elephone access has p omising bene i s o he pa ien –physician ela ionship [39] and is ecommended o accoun o he isks o hema oma and he a e isk o lidocaine in oxica ion ha may occu in he i s 24 h a e su ge y [17]. In o ma ion and beha io al ins uc ions ha e he po en ial o minimize s ess and anxie y and imp o e pos ope a i e ou comes [40]. Only six pa ien s had a slowe eco e y han hey had an icipa ed. Rega ding he pa ien s ha eco e ed as as o as e han hey expec ed, he speed o eco e y did no a ec o e all sa is ac ion (Table 6). P eexis ing men al heal h condi ions, including dep es- sion, anxie y diso de s, and subs ance abuse, ha e been no ed o be impo an p eope a i e isk ac o s o ad e se ou comes, esul ing in inc eased likelihood o hospi al- based acu e ca e pos ope a i ely [41]. Besides ASA III classi ica ion, which includes BMI C40, he s eng h o co ela ion and op imal cu o alues o pa ien selec ion pa ame e s o ou pa ien ca e a e unknown [42]. Since ambula o y su ge y has many ad an ages, u he s udies a e needed o app op ia e pa ien selec ion (Table 7). This s udy mus acknowledge some limi a ions. This s udy did no ha e ma ched con ols o pa ien s unde going a s anda d pe iope a i e model o ca e o s anda d gene al anes hesia. Howe e , he empi ical compa ison o he ERAS pa hway wi h he au ho ’s p io expe ience shows ha eco e y is much sho e and less pain ul, especially in he i s 24 h wi h he p o ocol desc ibed he ein. Besides, because ERAS has been shown o be mo e e ec i e when compa ed o s anda d p o ocol, doing so was deemed une hical. A esponse bias ega ding eco e y expec a ions can be uled ou since only ques ions ega ding he ea lies ime o showe and d i e a e su ge y we e occasionally asked. We only p esen da a om one ins i u ion; hus, he indings migh no be gene alizable o o he ins i u ions. Addi ionally, al e na i e anes he ic me hods migh no be compa ible wi h he indings o his s udy. Because o he he e ogenei y o p o essional ac i i ies, enhanced pos op- e a i e eco e y is mo e eliably de e mined by he e u n o compa able ac i i ies o daily li ing. To sa is y he call o he use o ep oducible and alida ed ques ionnai es, s udies may be inclined o use es ablished and alida ed ins umen s, comp omising sensi i i y and consis ency [12]. We ha e used he BREAST-Q ques ionnai e o e alua e sa is ac ion a e a g a ing o he b eas , acknowledging issues ega ding he consis ency o se e al i ems (‘‘The posi ion o you implan s on you ches ( oo high o oo low)’’; ‘‘How e enly you implan s a e posi- ioned in ela ion o each o he ?’’). Fac o s associa ed wi h hospi al expe ience ( oom com o , cleanliness, noise le el, ood se ice, ba h oom com o , e c.) a e con ounding ac o s a ec ing pa ien sa is ac ion wi h he ou come [43]. Since his s udy only in ol ed ambula o y su ge y, he impac o hospi al expe ience on pa ien sa is ac ion can be uled ou . Addi ional liposuc ion pe o med in 69% o pa ien s may accoun o an o e es ima ion o esidual pain, despi e a high com o due o in e cos al blocks. Howe e , pa ien s wi h liposuc ion did no ha e signi i- can ly mo e pain han pa ien s wi hou liposuc ion ( ank- sum es ; p= 0.788). Fo op imal sensi i i y and consis- ency, a ques ionnai e add essing impo an issues on eco e y a e aes he ic b eas su ge y has been de eloped o his esea ch. The ques ionnai e is p o ided in he appendix o c i ical app aisal o alidi y o ep oducibil- i y. Recall bias can be excluded. Conclusion Fas Reco e y Su ge y Pa ien s and su geons o en expec aes he ic b eas su ge y o be pe o med unde gene al anes hesia and ha e mod- e a e app ehension abou seda ion, in e cos al block, and Table 7 Ad an ages o ou pa ien ca e Ou pa ien ca e e sus o e nigh hospi al s ays Ambula ion Ou pa ien s walk a ound hei house and climb s ai s on he day o hei su ge y and can go o a 10min walk ou side on he i s pos ope a i e day (Table 5) Th ombosis Ou pa ien s ha e a smalle isk o h omboembolism [29] Sleep Ou pa ien s ha e a be e sleep [44] Com o Ou pa ien s bene i om a amilia en i onmen and mo e p i acy [44] Opioid medica ion Ou pa ien s a e less likely o become pe sis en opioid use s [45] Hospi al-acqui ed bac e ial in ec ions Ou pa ien s ha e a smalle isk o d ug- esis an in ec ions [46] Hospi al-acqui ed COVID- 19 Ou pa ien s ha e a lowe isk o nosocomial COVID-19 ansmission [47] Cos s Ou pa ien ea men s a e associa ed wi h lowe cos s [48,49] Risks/Su eillance Rou ine moni o ing o i al signs du ing o e nigh hospi al s ays is no e ec i e and o en inaccu a e [50] A s uc u ed elephone/ elemedicine ollow-up call by su geon 12 h pos ope a i ely is ad ised [13] 123 Aes h Plas Su g