scieee Open visual document viewer

Femoral Translation in Patients with Unicompartmental Osteoarthritis—A Cohort Study

Wegner, Mathis,Kuwert, Simon,Kratzenstein, Stefan,Simon, Maciej J. K.,Moradi, Babak

Abstract

The use of three-dimensional (3D) gait analysis to image femorotibial translation can aid in the diagnosis of pathology and provide additional insight into the severity of KOA (knee osteoarthritis). Femorotibial translation is of particular importance in patients undergoing UKA (unicompartmental knee arthroplasty), as the absence or elongation of ligamentous structures results in changes in the kinematic alignment. The aim of the study was to evaluate the parameters of femorotibial translation in patients with MOA (medial unicompartmental OA). An artificial model was employed to develop a method for calculating femorotibial translation in vitro. In a prospective cohort study, gait data using three-dimensional gait analysis were collected from 11 patients (68.73 ± 9.22 years) with severe OA scheduled for UKA and 29 unmatched healthy participants (22.07 ± 2.23 years). The discrete variables characterising femorotibial translation were compared for statistical significance (p < 0.05) using the Student’s t-test and the Mann–Whitney U-test. The results of the study validated an artificial model to mimic femorotibial translation. The comparison of patients scheduled for UKA and a healthy unmatched control group showed no statistically significant differences concerning femorotibial translation in all three planes (p > 0.05). However, the PROMs (patient-reported outcome measures), spatiotemporal, and kinematic parameters showed statistically significant differences between the groups (p < 0.001). The data presented here demonstrate typical changes in PROMs as well as spatiotemporal and kinematic outcomes for MOA as seen in knee OA. The results of the clinical gait analyses demonstrate individualised femorotibial translation. The extent of individual femorotibial translation may prove to be an important parameter for altered joint kinematics in patients with MOA, especially prior to UKA implantation.

Full text

Ci a ion: Wegne , M.; Kuwe , S.; K a zens ein, S.; Simon, M.J.K.; Mo adi, B. Femo al T ansla ion in Pa ien s wi h Unicompa men al Os eoa h i is—A Coho S udy. Biomechanics 2024,4, 428–438. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/ biomechanics4030029 Academic Edi o : A kady Voloshin Recei ed: 20 May 2024 Re ised: 30 June 2024 Accep ed: 10 July 2024 Published: 12 July 2024 Copy igh : © 2024 by he au ho s. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land. This a icle is an open access a icle dis ibu ed unde he e ms and condi ions o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion (CC BY) license (h ps:// c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/ 4.0/). A icle Femo al T ansla ion in Pa ien s wi h Unicompa men al Os eoa h i is—A Coho S udy Ma his Wegne 1,* , Simon Kuwe 1, S e an K a zens ein 2, Maciej J. K. Simon 1and Babak Mo adi 1 1Depa men o O hopedics and T auma Su ge y, Medical Uni e si y Cen e Schleswig-Hols ein—Campus Kiel, A nold-Helle -S asse 3, 24105 Kiel, Ge many; [email p o ec ed] (S.K.); [email p o ec ed] (M.J.K.S.); [email p o ec ed] (B.M.) 2CAU Mo ion Labo a o y, Kiel Uni e si y, Olshausens aße 74, 24098 Kiel, Ge many; [email p o ec ed] *Co espondence: [email p o ec ed]; Tel.: +49-431-500-24501 Abs ac : The use o h ee-dimensional (3D) gai analysis o image emo o ibial ansla ion can aid in he diagnosis o pa hology and p o ide addi ional insigh in o he se e i y o KOA (knee os eoa h i is). Femo o ibial ansla ion is o pa icula impo ance in pa ien s unde going UKA (unicompa men al knee a h oplas y), as he absence o elonga ion o ligamen ous s uc u es esul s in changes in he kinema ic alignmen . The aim o he s udy was o e alua e he pa ame e s o emo o ibial ansla ion in pa ien s wi h MOA (medial unicompa men al OA). An a i icial model was employed o de elop a me hod o calcula ing emo o ibial ansla ion in i o . In a p ospec- i e coho s udy, gai da a using h ee-dimensional gai analysis we e collec ed om 11 pa ien s ( 68.73 ±9.22 yea s ) wi h se e e OA scheduled o UKA and 29 unma ched heal hy pa icipan s ( 22.07 ±2.23 yea s ). The disc e e a iables cha ac e ising emo o ibial ansla ion we e compa ed o s a is ical signi icance (p< 0.05) using he S uden ’s - es and he Mann–Whi ney U- es . The esul s o he s udy alida ed an a i icial model o mimic emo o ibial ansla ion. The compa ison o pa- ien s scheduled o UKA and a heal hy unma ched con ol g oup showed no s a is ically signi ican di e ences conce ning emo o ibial ansla ion in all h ee planes (p> 0.05). Howe e , he PROMs (pa ien - epo ed ou come measu es), spa io empo al, and kinema ic pa ame e s showed s a is ically signi ican di e ences be ween he g oups (p< 0.001). The da a p esen ed he e demons a e ypical changes in PROMs as well as spa io empo al and kinema ic ou comes o MOA as seen in knee OA. The esul s o he clinical gai analyses demons a e indi idualised emo o ibial ansla ion. The ex en o indi idual emo o ibial ansla ion may p o e o be an impo an pa ame e o al e ed join kinema ics in pa ien s wi h MOA, especially p io o UKA implan a ion. Keywo ds: emo o ibial ansla ion; 3D gai analysis; knee os eoa h i is 1. In oduc ion Knee os eoa h i is (KOA) is he mos p e alen o m o os eoa h i is (OA) in he Wes e n wo ld. I is cha ac e ised by pain, swelling, s i ness and slow wea . KOA can esul in a loss o join unc ion and a signi ican educ ion in he quali y o li e o he a ec ed indi idual [ 1 ]. Among he h ee compa men s o he knees, KOA is mos com- monly obse ed in he medial compa men [ 2 – 5 ]. The cu en imaging p ocedu es o he diagnosis o KOA ( adiog aphy, compu ed omog aphy, magne esonance imaging) a e exclusi ely s a ic imaging echniques. Func ional changes associa ed wi h he disease canno be e alua ed [ 2 , 3 ]. The use o dynamic gai analysis has been es ablished as a diagnos ic ool o he iden i ica ion o kinema ic changes associa ed wi h KOA [ 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 ]. Reduced knee lexion a heel s ike, educed knee abduc ion angle a 50% o s ance phase and educed knee lexion ange du ing gai ha e been epo ed in pa ien s wi h KOA [ 8 ]. The emo al condyles’ ansla ion ela i e o he ibia has been he subjec o a limi ed Biomechanics 2024,4, 428–438. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/biomechanics4030029 h ps://www.mdpi.com/jou nal/biomechanics Biomechanics 2024,4429 numbe o s udies, which ha e yielded he e ogeneous esul s [ 6 , 7 , 9 – 12 ]. Consequen ly, he ibio- emo al mo emen pa e ns emain a subjec o con en ion. Femo o ibial ansla ion is o c i ical impo ance in pa ien s wi h medial unicompa - men al knee os eoa h i is (MOA), as i is a key pa ame e e lec ing he abno mal loading and wea pa e ns o he a ec ed compa men o he knee join [ 3 ]. The inc eased shea o ces ha ac du ing his phase o he gai cycle esul in inc eased wea and ea , leading o g ea e ca ilage loss. This esul s in a change in he kinema ics o he knee join and a u he inc ease in emo o ibial ansla ion, which ep esen s a sign o ea ly os eoa h i is (OA) [6–8]. In ea ly MOA, mobile-bea ing UKA (unicompa men al knee a h oplas y) ep e- sen s a alid he apeu ic op ion wi h g ea ad an ages o pa ien s. The bea ing pe ec ly con o ms wi h emo al and ibial componen s and mo es comple ely passi ely be ween he emo al and ibial implan [ 13 ]. This esul s in almos physiologic knee kinema ics compa ed wi h o al knee a h oplas y (TKA) [ 14 , 15 ]. UKA in ol es eplacing only he damaged compa men o he knee, hus p ese ing he heal hy bone, ca ilage, and lig- amen s. This leads o a mo e na u al knee unc ion pos -su ge y. Many pa ien s epo high le els o sa is ac ion wi h he ou comes o UKA, including imp o ed unc ion and quali y o li e. The UKA’s knee-spa ing app oach has led o an inc ease in he numbe o implan ed unicondyla endop os heses, which, in u n, has necessi a ed high-quali y su gical indica ions [ 13 , 16 – 19 ]. The kinema ic alignmen and, hus, he unc ion o he ligamen s uc u es in he knee join is o pa icula impo ance when de e mining he indica ion o su ge y and implan a ion o a UKA. A de iciency in he an e io c ucia e ligamen ha becomes appa en du ing su ge y has signi ican consequences o he pa ien , as he implan composi ion mus be al e ed o a o al knee a h oplas y (TKA) mus be employed [2,7,15]. I he indica ion is co ec , he kinema ically aligned UKA ep esen s an al e na i e knee p os hesis ha is mo e indi idualised, physiological and ana omical [ 17 ]. The abili y o adequa ely isualise emo o ibial ansla ion in a p eope a i e h ee-dimensional gai analysis would signi ican ly con ibu e o an e en mo e p ecise indica ion o he implan a- ion o a UKA. Consequen ly, he de elopmen o indi idualised implan s in a h oplas y would be u he ad anced. Gi en he g owing numbe o kinema ically aligned UKAs, i becomes e iden ha a unc ional assessmen o he MOA is necessa y. The objec i e o ou s udy was o in es iga e he di e ences in emo o ibial ansla ion in pa ien s unde going planned UKA. 2. Ma e ials and Me hods The da a used in his s udy we e collec ed in an in i o se ing and a clinical case- con ol s udy. In he i s pa , an a i icial model was used o de elop a me hod o calcula ing emo o ibial ansla ion in i o using 3D gai analysis. In he second pa o he s udy, he e icacy o a me hod o isualising emo o ibial ansla ion using 3D kinema ic mo ion analysis was e alua ed. This was pe o med h ough a p ospec i e coho s udy ha pe o med an in aindi idual compa ison o a g oup wi h MOA in which UKA is indica ed. This was ollowed by a compa ison wi h a heal hy con ol g oup. Emphasis was placed on he loading esponse in he s ance phase o he gai cycle [ 8 ]. In ou se ing, he loading esponse was de ined as he i s 12% o he gai cycle. Ini ial con ac was iden i ied using kinema ic-based e en de ec ion. 2.1. Model Analysis Fo calcula ing emo o ibial ansla ion in i o , a i ual ma ke wi hin he ibial pla eau was c ea ed by using he analogue ma ke placemen s on he medial and la e al edges o he ibia and se ing he i ual ma ke o hal he dis ance be ween hem, whe e emo o ibial ansla ion was expec ed o be he la ges . An ana omical a i icial bone model wi h an implan ed medial mobile-bea ing UKA wi h a emo able inlay was used. A coo dina e sys em was compiled a he dis al end o he emu . The i ual ma ke is Biomechanics 2024,4430 illus a ed in Figu e 1. To assess emo o ibial ansla ion, he mo emen o he i ual ibial ma ke was eco ded in he local emo al coo dina e sys em and calcula ed as ROM in he loading esponse o he an e io –pos e io , medio–la e al, and c anio–caudal axes o he a e aged mo emen . Biomechanics 2024, 5, FOR PEER REVIEW 3 A coo dina e sys em was compiled a he dis al end o he emu . The i ual ma ke is illus a ed in Figu e 1. To assess emo o ibial ansla ion, he mo emen o he i ual ib- ial ma ke was eco ded in he local emo al coo dina e sys em and calcula ed as ROM in he loading esponse o he an e io –pos e io , medio–la e al, and c anio–caudal axes o he a e aged mo emen . Figu e 1. Ma ke sys em wi h he i ual ibial ma ke (blue). In he in i o model, he diffe ences be ween a physiological and a pa hological mo emen wi h inc eased emo o ibial ansla ion we e eco ded using an ana omic model o he knee wi h he implan ed mobile-bea ing UKA, a emo able inlay and sp ings applied o mimic ligamen ension [20]. 2.2. Clinical S udy F om 2021 un il 2022, pa ien s wi h an indica ion o a medial UKA a a uni e si y medical cen e we e included in he p ospec i e coho s udy. Pa icipan s comple ed he ollowing ques ionnai es, including pa ien - epo ed ou come measu es (PROMs): he Ox o d Knee Sco e (OKS) [21], he Knee Socie y Sco e (KSS) [22], he Uni e si y o Cali- o nia a Los Angeles (UCLA) Ac i i y Scale, he Nume ic Ra ing Scale (NRS) o pain [23] and he Sho Fo m 12 Ques ionnai e (SF-12) [24]. 2.3. Rec ui men and Inclusion C i e ia Inclusion c i e ia o he MOA g oup consis ed o se e e unila e al os eoa h i is o he medial compa men classi ied using he Kellg en–Law ence classi ica ion [25] o he Ahlbäck classi ica ion [26] wi h ull- hickness a icula ca ilage loss (‘bone on bone’). In all pa ien s in he p eope a i e examina ion, he an e io c ucia e ligamen and he medial and la e al colla e al ligamen s we e unc ionally in ac , he algus de o mi y was manu- ally co ec able and he e was no e idence o OA in he la e al knee compa men . Rheu- ma oid a h i is, ixed algus de o mi y (e.g., >15°), lexion de o mi y > 15°, o he inabili y o walk 6 min wi hou an assis i e de ice was conside ed a con aindica ion. The con ol Figu e 1. Ma ke sys em wi h he i ual ibial ma ke (blue). In he in i o model, he di e ences be ween a physiological and a pa hological mo emen wi h inc eased emo o ibial ansla ion we e eco ded using an ana omic model o he knee wi h he implan ed mobile-bea ing UKA, a emo able inlay and sp ings applied o mimic ligamen ension [20]. 2.2. Clinical S udy F om 2021 un il 2022, pa ien s wi h an indica ion o a medial UKA a a uni e si y medical cen e we e included in he p ospec i e coho s udy. Pa icipan s comple ed he ollowing ques ionnai es, including pa ien - epo ed ou come measu es (PROMs): he Ox o d Knee Sco e (OKS) [ 21 ], he Knee Socie y Sco e (KSS) [ 22 ], he Uni e si y o Cali o nia a Los Angeles (UCLA) Ac i i y Scale, he Nume ic Ra ing Scale (NRS) o pain [23] and he Sho Fo m 12 Ques ionnai e (SF-12) [24]. 2.3. Rec ui men and Inclusion C i e ia Inclusion c i e ia o he MOA g oup consis ed o se e e unila e al os eoa h i is o he medial compa men classi ied using he Kellg en–Law ence classi ica ion [ 25 ] o he Ahlbäck classi ica ion [ 26 ] wi h ull- hickness a icula ca ilage loss (‘bone on bone’). In all pa ien s in he p eope a i e examina ion, he an e io c ucia e ligamen and he medial and la e al colla e al ligamen s we e unc ionally in ac , he algus de o mi y was manually co ec able and he e was no e idence o OA in he la e al knee compa men . Rheuma oid a h i is, ixed algus de o mi y (e.g., >15 ◦ ), lexion de o mi y > 15 ◦ , o he inabili y o walk 6 min wi hou an assis i e de ice was conside ed a con aindica ion. The con ol Biomechanics 2024,4431 g oup consis ed o young and heal hy subjec s. Excluded we e pa icipan s wi h p io knee su ge y and unc ional limi a ions in he knee. 2.4. Mo ion Analysis To e alua e kinema ic join pa ame e s, spa io empo al pa ame e s we e collec ed, and emo o ibial ansla ion and gai analysis we e pe o med using he Op iT ack 3D mo ion analysis sys em (Na u alPoin Inc., Co allis, OR, USA) wi h a eco ding equency o 100 Hz and he “705 CST P o o m” eadmill. Thi een e lec i e ma ke s we e a ached wi h adhesi e ape o ana omical landma ks on each leg [ 27 ] (Figu e 2). The eco dings we e managed using ‘Cap u e2D™’ ( 1.0.0.194, C-Mo ion Inc., Boyds, MD, USA) [ 20 ]. A lowpass Bu e wo h il e wi h a h eshold o 6 Hz o he i s o de was applied o p ocess and analyse he eco ded da a, and missing da a we e in e pola ed up o 10 ames using Visual 3D P o essional™ ( 1.0.0.194, C-Mo ion Inc., Boyds, MD, USA). All pa icipan s walked o wa d and we e eco ded o 30 s. Biomechanics 2024, 5, FOR PEER REVIEW 4 g oup consis ed o young and heal hy subjec s. Excluded we e pa icipan s wi h p io knee su ge y and unc ional limi a ions in he knee. 2.4. Mo ion Analysis To e alua e kinema ic join pa ame e s, spa io empo al pa ame e s we e collec ed, and emo o ibial ansla ion and gai analysis we e pe o med using he Op iT ack 3D mo ion analysis sys em (Na u alPoin Inc., Co allis, OR, USA) wi h a eco ding e- quency o 100 Hz and he “705 CST P o o m” eadmill. Thi een e lec i e ma ke s we e a ached wi h adhesi e ape o ana omical landma ks on each leg [27] (Figu e 2). The e- co dings we e managed using ‘Cap u e2D™’ ( 1.0.0.194, C-Mo ion Inc., Boyds, MD, USA) [20]. A lowpass Bu e wo h il e wi h a h eshold o 6 Hz o he i s o de was applied o p ocess and analyse he eco ded da a, and missing da a we e in e pola ed up o 10 ames using Visual 3D P o essional™ ( 1.0.0.194, C-Mo ion Inc., Boyds, MD, USA). All pa icipan s walked o wa d and we e eco ded o 30 s. (a) (b) Figu e 2. Re lec ing ma ke s used o gai analysis: (a) on al iew; (b) sagi al iew. 2.5. Mo ion Assessmen P io o eco ding gai and unning analyses, an accele a ion-based unc ional cali- b a ion p ocedu e was pe o med each ime. Pa icipan s began walking on he eadmill a a sel -selec ed speed. Pa icipan s had a six-minu e pe iod o habi ua ion o walking on he eadmill o ule ou bias due o al e ed gai pa e n [28]. A e a com o able walking speed was es ablished, he in es iga o eco ded a leas 23 walking cycles on he eadmill a e signalling he pa icipan . Spa io empo al mo ion pa ame e s, as well as he ROM in all h ee axes, we e eco ded pe pa icipan . In all eco dings, he used ma ke sys em had a esidual o 1.2 mm. 2.6. S a is ical Analysis S a is ical analysis was pe o med by using Jamo i o Windows (The Jamo i p ojec (2022), Ve sion 2.2.5, www.jamo i.o g accessed on 7 May 2023). Fo no mal dis ibu ion, Figu e 2. Re lec ing ma ke s used o gai analysis: (a) on al iew; (b) sagi al iew. 2.5. Mo ion Assessmen P io o eco ding gai and unning analyses, an accele a ion-based unc ional calib a- ion p ocedu e was pe o med each ime. Pa icipan s began walking on he eadmill a a sel -selec ed speed. Pa icipan s had a six-minu e pe iod o habi ua ion o walking on he eadmill o ule ou bias due o al e ed gai pa e n [28]. A e a com o able walking speed was es ablished, he in es iga o eco ded a leas 23 walking cycles on he eadmill a e signalling he pa icipan . Spa io empo al mo ion pa ame e s, as well as he ROM in all h ee axes, we e eco ded pe pa icipan . In all eco dings, he used ma ke sys em had a esidual o 1.2 mm. Biomechanics 2024,4432 2.6. S a is ical Analysis S a is ical analysis was pe o med by using Jamo i o Windows (The Jamo i p ojec (2022), Ve sion 2.2.5, www.jamo i.o g accessed on 7 May 2023). Fo no mal dis ibu ion, he Shapi o–Wilk es was pe o med. The S uden ’s - es and he Mann–Whi ney U- es we e used o es o s a is ical signi icance. The signi icance le el was de ined as p< 0.05. Fo mul iple es ing, he Bon e oni co ec ion was applied [29]. 3. Resul s 3.1. In Vi o Analysis The ROM o he ibial ma ke in he loading esponse phase o he gai cycle is shown in Table 1. The collec ed esul s a y when a i icial ligamen ension is applied o he inlay is emo ed. Table 1. Range o he emo o ibial ansla ion in he a i icial model o a knee. Values a e gi en as mean ±s anda d de ia ion (SD). Range o Mo ion Medio–La e al An e io –Pos e io C anio–Caudal mean ±SD [mm] 2.05 ±1.05 2.25 ±0.55 2.18 ±0.57 inlay−/s ings+ 1.11 1.58 1.34 inlay−/s ings−3.14 2.31 2.43 inlay+/s ings+ 1.21 2.92 2.47 inlay+/s ings−2.75 2.21 2.50 3.2. Case–Con ol S udy A o al o 40 pa icipan s we e included in he s udy. The MOA g oup consis ed o 11 pa ien s (3 women, 8 men) wi h se e e MOA scheduled o unicompa men al knee eplacemen su ge y. The con ol g oup con ained 29 heal hy pa icipan s (16 women, 13 men). Demog aphic da a a e shown in Table 2. Table 2. Demog aphics o he pa icipan s. Values as mean ±s anda d de ia ion (SD). Pa ame e s Con ol G oup MOA G oup age [yea s] 22.07 ±2.23 68.73 ±9.22 heigh [cm] 175.76 ±7.79 179.27 ±7.96 weigh [kg] 69.91 ±12.43 88.27 ±17.75 BMI 1[kg/m2]22.5 ±2.83 27.52 ±5.59 1Body mass index. The MOA g oup showed signi ican di e ences in he KSS (p< 0.001), OKS (p< 0.001), UCLA Ac i i y Scale (p< 0.001), NRS o pain (p< 0.001) and SF-12 Physical Componen Summa y (PCS) (p< 0.001) o he con ols. The SF-12 Men al Componen Summa y (MCS) showed no signi ican di e ences (p= 0.785). The absolu e alues a e shown in Table 3. Table 3. Sco es o he pa icipan s in he case–con ol s udy. Values a e gi en as mean ±SD. Sco es [Range] Con ol G oup MOA G oup p-Value KSS 1[0–200] 195.5 ±8.38 126.73 ±42.54 <0.001 OKS 2[12–60] 12.20 ±0.95 31.40 ±4.92 <0.001 UCLAAS 3[1–10] 9.66 ±1.04 6.36 ±1.03 <0.001 NRS 4[0–10] 0.35 ±0.90 5.36 ±1.86 <0.001 SF-12 PCS 556.80 ±2.37 38.6 ±8.48 <0.001 SF-12 MCS 654.20 ±6.94 54.10 ±10.40 0.785 1 Knee Socie y Sco e. 2 Ox o d Knee Sco e. 3 UCLA Ac i i y Scale. 4 Nume ic Ra ing Scale. 5 Sho Fo m 12-I em Heal h Su ey Physical Componen Summa y. 6 Sho Fo m 12-I em Heal h Su ey Men al Componen Summa y. Biomechanics 2024,4433 The spa io empo al pa ame e s o he MOA g oup showed a signi ican educ ion in speed (1.23 ± 0.16 m/s s. 0.86 ± 0.31 m/s, p< 0.001) and s ide leng h (1.4 ± 0.16 m s. 1.0 ± 0.28 m, p< 0.001) compa ed o he con ol g oup (Table 4). S ide equency was no signi ican ly di e en (105.0 ± 6.5 s eps/min s. 99.0 ± 15.9 s eps/min, p= 0.074). The ROM o lexion signi ican ly dec eased h oughou he gai cycle o bo h legs ( p< 0.001 ). Loading esponse changes in lexion di e ences we e no s a is ically signi i- can ( p= 0.074 le , p= 0.096 igh ). The di e ences in ROM o abduc ion/adduc ion we e no signi ican . Table 4. Spa io empo al and kinema ic pa ame e s in he case–con ol s udy. Pa ame e s Side Con ol G oup MOA G oup p-Value eloci y [m/s] 1.23 ±0.16 0.86 ±0.31 <0.01 *,1 cadence [1/min] 105.00 ±6.50 99.00 ±15.9 0.07 1 s ide leng h [m] 1.40 ±0.16 1.02 ±0.28 <0.01 *,1 ROM lexion [◦] ull gai cycle le 62.57 ±6.99 50.00 ±7.61 <0.01 *,1 igh 62.58 ±6.32 52.40 ±6.58 <0.01 *,1 ROM lexion [◦] loading esponse le 9.34 ±3.81 7.10 ±7 6.59 0.07 2 igh 12.35 ±4.43 10.50 ±8.95 0.09 2 ROM ab-/adduc ion [◦] ull gai cycle le 12.03 ±3.97 9.16 ±2.90 0.04 1 igh 11.74 ±4.03 8.24 ±2.99 0.01 1 ROM ab-/adduc ion [◦] loading esponse le 3.78 ±1.89 2.59 ±1.50 0.07 2 igh 3.57 ±1.46 3.00 ±1.82 0.18 2 Mean ± s anda d de ia ion, ROM = ange o mo ion, * s a is ical signi icance, 1 S uden ’s - es , 2 Mann–Whi ney U- es . Femo o ibial ansla ion in he loading phase was no signi ican ly di e en be ween he MOA g oup and he con ol g oup (Table 5). The 4% gai cycle ime shi was applied o he da a p io o analysis. Table 5. Femo o ibial ansla ion in he loading esponse. Axis Side Con ol G oup MOA G oup p-Value medio–la e al [mm] le 5.2 ±2.9 4.1 ±2.6 0.27 1 igh 6.6 ±4.5 4.6 ±3.6 0.18 2 an e io –pos e io [mm] le 8.6 ±4.4 7.4 ±5.0 0.46 1 igh 8.6 ±5.3 9.7 ±7.5 0.79 2 c anio–caudal [mm] le 2.6 ±1.5 3.5 ±2.8 0.16 1 igh 4.5 ±2.4 5.1 ±3.6 0.56 1 Mean ±SD, 1S uden ’s - es , 2Mann–Whi ney U- es . Di e ences be ween he pa ien s’ legs we e conside ed. In he medio–la e al axis, ansla ion was 3.2 ± 2.0 mm in he diseased limb and 5.5 ± 3.6 mm in he heal hy limb ( p= 0.065 ). An e io –pos e io ansla ion was 8.2 ± 3.6 mm (diseased limb) and 9.0 ±8.4 mm (heal hy limb) (p= 0.562). Fo supe io –in e io , ansla ion was 3.5 ±2.3 mm (diseased limb) and 5.2 ± 3.9 mm (heal hy limb) (p= 0.401). The in aindi- idual compa ison showed no s a is ically signi ican di e ences. A la ge in aindi idual a ia ion o emo o ibial ansla ion in he an e io –pos e io plane is exempla ily shown in Figu e 3. Biomechanics 2024,4434 Biomechanics 2024, 5, FOR PEER REVIEW 7 (a) (b) Figu e 3. Femo o ibial ansla ion in he loading esponse phase ( i s 12% o he gai cycle) in he an e io –pos e io plane o he case–con ol s udy: (a) con ol g oup; (b) MOA g oup. 4. Discussion OA is one o he mos common causes o pain ul loss o mobili y in many popula ions [30,31]. Biological, mechanical and s uc u al componen s a e associa ed wi h OA as a dis- ease o he whole join [2]. An in e play o me abolic and mechanical changes and changes in he le els o in lamma o y cy okines [6] leads o an o e all change in he kinema ics o he join as an exp ession o he clinical p og ession o OA. As he se e i y o OA co e- sponds wi h he exp ession o kinema ic changes [14], he iming o diagnosis and in e - en ion is essen ial o pa ien s’ ou comes [2]. Gai analysis can be used o iden i y unc ional changes in knee kinema ics in pa ien s wi h KOA. Dec eased knee lexion and p olonged heel s ike du ing he loading esponse phase o he gai cycle a e signs o ea ly OA [8]. The me hodical app oach ca ied ou in his s udy demons a es ha small dec eases in ligamen ension esul in a highe em- o o ibial ansla ion du ing he loading esponse phase as a possible indica o and ea ly sign o changed knee kinema ics in OA esul ing in mechanical changes (Figu e 3). To p o e ha inc eased emo o ibial ansla ion is p esen in pa ien s wi h se ious KOA and can be subs an ia ed by 3D gai analysis and demons a ed among o he ypical KOA changes, we ca ied ou a ield ial using a eadmill algo i hm and a ma ke -based analy ic sys em [32]. Ou expe imen al design was con i med by mul iple eco dings, e- sul ing in a low a iance o da a. In ecen yea s, ma ke less mo ion analysis me hods and in e ac i e measu emen sys ems ha e been gaining g ound. The in eg a ion o a i icial in elligence in o mo ion analysis opens up he possibili y o pe o ming mo ion analysis wi h less da a acquisi ion and p ocessing ime compa ed o ma ke -based me hods [33]. Ne e heless, we chose o eco d he gai o pa ien s wi h KOA using a ma ke -based sys- em because he de e mina ion o join cen es and join angles wi h a ma ke less sys em is no ye accu a e enough o clinical applica ions. The esul s o his s udy demons a e and con i m os eoa h i ic changes in se e e unicompa men al medial OA gai [15]. Signi ican changes in spa io empo al and kine- ma ic pa ame e s ypical o pa ien s wi h MOA we e ound. These included educed speed, educed s ide leng h and educed ROM o knee lexion [8–13]. Diffe ences in ca- dence and s ide leng h and ROM o abduc ion/adduc ion we e no s a is ically signi i- can . Recen s udies ha e demons a ed gai abno mali ies in os eoa h i ic join s using ma ke less 3D gai analysis and wea able senso s [34,35]. Boekes eijn (e al.) (2022) showed spa io empo al changes and compensa o y mechanisms ypical o OA and we e able o objec i ely assess he gai pa e n using an ine ial measu emen sys em in a clini- cal se ing. Wang (e al.) (2024) ound he amoun o knee lexion du ing inline lunging o be ano he po en ial indica o o knee os eoa h i is using a ma ke less mo ion cap u e sys em [35]. Figu e 3. Femo o ibial ansla ion in he loading esponse phase ( i s 12% o he gai cycle) in he an e io –pos e io plane o he case–con ol s udy: (a) con ol g oup; (b) MOA g oup. 4. Discussion OA is one o he mos common causes o pain ul loss o mobili y in many popula ions [30,31] . Biological, mechanical and s uc u al componen s a e associa ed wi h OA as a disease o he whole join [ 2 ]. An in e play o me abolic and mechanical changes and changes in he le els o in lamma o y cy okines [ 6 ] leads o an o e all change in he kinema ics o he join as an exp ession o he clinical p og ession o OA. As he se e i y o OA co esponds wi h he exp ession o kinema ic changes [ 14 ], he iming o diagnosis and in e en ion is essen ial o pa ien s’ ou comes [2]. Gai analysis can be used o iden i y unc ional changes in knee kinema ics in pa ien s wi h KOA. Dec eased knee lexion and p olonged heel s ike du ing he loading esponse phase o he gai cycle a e signs o ea ly OA [ 8 ]. The me hodical app oach ca ied ou in his s udy demons a es ha small dec eases in ligamen ension esul in a highe emo o ibial ansla ion du ing he loading esponse phase as a possible indica o and ea ly sign o changed knee kinema ics in OA esul ing in mechanical changes (Figu e 3). To p o e ha inc eased emo o ibial ansla ion is p esen in pa ien s wi h se ious KOA and can be subs an ia ed by 3D gai analysis and demons a ed among o he ypical KOA changes, we ca ied ou a ield ial using a eadmill algo i hm and a ma ke -based analy ic sys em [ 32 ]. Ou expe imen al design was con i med by mul iple eco dings, esul ing in a low a iance o da a. In ecen yea s, ma ke less mo ion analysis me hods and in e ac i e measu emen sys ems ha e been gaining g ound. The in eg a ion o a i icial in elligence in o mo ion analysis opens up he possibili y o pe o ming mo ion analysis wi h less da a acquisi ion and p ocessing ime compa ed o ma ke -based me hods [ 33 ]. Ne e heless, we chose o eco d he gai o pa ien s wi h KOA using a ma ke -based sys em because he de e mina ion o join cen es and join angles wi h a ma ke less sys em is no ye accu a e enough o clinical applica ions. The esul s o his s udy demons a e and con i m os eoa h i ic changes in se e e unicompa men al medial OA gai [ 15 ]. Signi ican changes in spa io empo al and kine- ma ic pa ame e s ypical o pa ien s wi h MOA we e ound. These included educed speed, educed s ide leng h and educed ROM o knee lexion [ 8 – 13 ]. Di e ences in cadence and s ide leng h and ROM o abduc ion/adduc ion we e no s a is ically signi ican . Recen s udies ha e demons a ed gai abno mali ies in os eoa h i ic join s using ma ke less 3D gai analysis and wea able senso s [ 34 , 35 ]. Boekes eijn (e al.) (2022) showed spa io em- po al changes and compensa o y mechanisms ypical o OA and we e able o objec i ely assess he gai pa e n using an ine ial measu emen sys em in a clinical se ing. Wang (e al.) (2024) ound he amoun o knee lexion du ing inline lunging o be ano he po en ial indica o o knee os eoa h i is using a ma ke less mo ion cap u e sys em [35]. Biomechanics 2024,4435 When looking a PROMs, ou coho displays di e ences om he con ol g oup in all sco es speci ic o knee unc ion, con i ming ha ou MOA coho had signi ican ly wo se knee unc ion and physical heal h. MOA pa ien s did no show any impai men s ega ding hei men al heal h despi e hei ad anced KOA. O e all, ou MOA coho was ep esen a i e o pa ien s wi h KOA [36]. The hypo hesis ha an os eoa h i ic knee would ha e a g ea e emo o ibial ans- la ion han an una ec ed knee was no con i med. Ou s udy design may ha e led o g oup e ec s due o signi ican di e ences in demog aphics (age, weigh , BMI). Inc easing age in luences he spa io empo al pa ame e s o gai , as ageing leads o educed join mobili y and a dec ease in muscle mass. Inc eased weigh , and consequen ly inc eased BMI, inc eases join loading and g ound eac ion o ces, which can lead o al e ed gai pa e ns in people wi h highe BMI. When high BMI and olde age a e combined, hei e ec s on gai may be exace ba ed and esul in a unc ional decline [37–39]. The e we e no s a is ically signi ican di e ences in emo o ibial ansla ion be ween he con ol and MOA g oups. This is consis en wi h he da a om Fa e (e al.) (2014), who we e unable o de ec an e io displacemen o he emu in pa ien s wi h se e e OA. [ 40 ]. In hei s udy on he ela ionship be ween he Kellg en–Law ence sco e and 3D kinema ic gai analysis, Zeng (e al.) (2017) obse ed ha in a Chinese popula ion su e ing om KOA, he e was inc eased emo al ansla ion an e io ly and dis ally a heel s ike. In a ecen s udy by Pos olka (e al.) (2020), he au ho s demons a e ha he ansla ion be ween he wo emo al condyles and he ibia is highly ask-dependen and indi idualised. They also s a e ha u he esea ch is needed o cla i y he ole o limb alignmen on knee join kinema ics, which is consis en wi h ou indings. The s udy indica es ha he selec ion o implan s o a h oplas y should be indi idualised, aking in o accoun he ecogni ion o knee join kinema ics p io o su ge y. This app oach may acili a e u he imp o emen s in a h oplas y ou comes. In he cu en s udy, no ele an di e ences be ween he le and igh sides we e iden- i ied (Table 5). I is no iceable ha he sca e o he da a is la ge in ou s udy popula ion. This means ha he e is a la ge in e indi idual a ia ion in emo o ibial ansla ion as well, wi hou a speci ic pa e n being ecognisable o KOA (Figu e 3). Fu he mo e, he e is no ele an di e ence in emo o ibial ansla ion be ween he heal hy and diseased limbs in he MOA g oup. This is in con as o a s udy by Zeng (e al.) (2024), which demons a ed inc eased emo o ibial ansla ion in ACL-de icien knees wi h ca ilage lesions compa ed o ACL-de icien knees wi hou ca ilage lesions in pa ien s wi h pos - auma ic os eoa h i- is (PTOA). These esul s could ha e signi ican implica ions o u u e indica ions o UKA o TKA and suppo he need o p eope a i e kinema ic analysis in pa ien s wi h MOA, especially in PTOA [7]. KOA is no limi ed o one limb, as p e iously desc ibed by Pe y (1992) and Good- ellow (e al.) (2015). KOA al e s mechanical and kinema ic pa e ns in mo emen as a sys emic disease; hus, he impai ed unc ion o one leg leads o an al e ed gai pa e n in bo h legs [2,8,15]. The indings o his s udy mus be in e p e ed in he con ex o i s limi a ions. T eadmill walking p o ides con olled and epea able condi ions, ye i can al e na u al gai pa e ns and esul in slowe gai speed and sho e s ide leng h [ 41 ]. This is a bias in ou s udy ha mus be aken in o accoun when in e p e ing he esul s. Skin ma ke s we e used o eco d he mo emen s; howe e , ma ke placemen is known o be able o bias da a. In ou eco dings, he used ma ke sys em had a esidual o 1.2 mm, which led o unce ain y. This p oblem is p esen in any ma ke -based mo ion cap u e sys em and canno be excluded. The e o e, his inaccu acy o 1.2 mm o he emo o ibial ansla ion could ha e caused bias and de aul ed in o no signi ican a iances be ween heal hy and unheal hy join s. Thi dly, he numbe o pa icipan s was limi ed o n = 40, and he g oups we e no age-ma ched. We unde s and ha he g oups a e di icul o compa e, bu he goal was o eco d a heal hy knee and compa e i wi h se e e OA o he knee; he e o e, we decided o include young and heal hy pa icipan s in he con ol g oup despi e he age di e ences and possible bias. Biomechanics 2024,4436 5. Conclusions The cu en esul s co obo a e he ypical changes obse ed in PROMs, as well as he spa io empo al and kinema ic esul s associa ed wi h MOA, as e idenced by he gai changes ypically obse ed in pa ien s wi h KOA. Howe e , clinical gai analyses e ealed no signi ican di e ence in emo o ibial ansla ion du ing he loading esponse phase o s ance. The ex en o indi idual emo o ibial ansla ion may p o e o be an impo an pa ame e o al e ed join kinema ics in pa ien s wi h MOA, especially p io o UKA implan a ion. In he u u e, he ex en o emo o ibial ansla ion may p o ide aluable in o ma ion o he diagnosis, ea men and moni o ing o MOA. Au ho Con ibu ions: Concep ualisa ion, S.K. (Simon Kuwe ), M.W., S.K. (S e an K a zens ein) and B.M.; me hodology, S.K. (Simon Kuwe ) and S.K. (S e an K a zens ein); so wa e, S.K. (Simon Kuwe ) and S.K. (S e an K a zens ein); alida ion, S.K. (Simon Kuwe ), S.K. (S e an K a zens ein), M.W. and B.M.; o mal analysis, S.K. (Simon Kuwe ); in es iga ion, S.K. (Simon Kuwe ); esou ces, S.K. (S e an K a zens ein); da a cu a ion, S.K. (Simon Kuwe ); w i ing—o iginal d a p epa a ion, S.K. (Simon Kuwe ); w i ing— e iew and edi ing, S.K. (Simon Kuwe ), M.W., S.K. (S e an K a zens ein), M.J.K.S. and B.M.; isualisa ion, S.K. (Simon Kuwe ); supe ision, B.M.; p ojec adminis a ion, S.K. (S e an K a zens ein) and B.M. All au ho s ha e ead and ag eed o he published e sion o he manusc ip . Funding: This esea ch ecei ed no ex e nal unding. Ins i u ional Re iew Boa d S a emen : The s udy was conduc ed in acco dance wi h he Decla a ion o Helsinki and app o ed by he Ins i u ional E hics Commi ee o Kiel Uni e si y (D536/21). In o med Consen S a emen : In o med consen was ob ained om all subjec s in ol ed in he s udy. Da a A ailabili y S a emen : Da a a e con ained wi hin he a icle. Con lic s o In e es : The au ho s decla e no con lic s o in e es . Re e ences 1. Felson, D.T. os eoa h i is o he knee. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006,354, 841–848. [C ossRe ] 2. Good ellow, J. Unicompa men al A h oplas y wi h he Ox o d Knee, 2nd ed.; Good ellow Publishe s Limi ed: Ox o d, UK, 2015. 3. Zeng, X.; Ma, L.; Lin, Z.; Huang, W.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Mao, C. Rela ionship be ween Kellg en-Law ence sco e and 3D kinema ic gai analysis o pa ien s wi h medial knee os eoa h i is using a new gai sys em. Sci. Rep. 2017,7, 4080. [C ossRe ] [PubMed] [PubMed Cen al] 4. Shelbu ne, K.B.; To y, M.R.; Pandy, M.G. Con ibu ions o muscles, ligamen s, and he g ound- eac ion o ce o ibio emo al join loading du ing no mal gai . J. O hop. Res. 2006,24, 1983–1990. [C ossRe ] 5. B aga, L.; Renne , J.B.; Schwa z, T.A.; Wooda d, J.; Helmick, C.G.; Hochbe g, M.C.; Jo dan, J.M. Di e ences in adiog aphic ea u es o knee os eoa h i is in A ican-Ame icans and Caucasians: The Johns on coun y os eoa h i is p ojec . Os eoa h . Ca il. 2009,17, 1554–1561. [C ossRe ] 6. And iacchi, T.P.; Fa e, J.; E ha -Hledik, J.C.; Chu, C.R. A sys ems iew o isk ac o s o knee os eoa h i is e eals insigh s in o he pa hogenesis o he disease. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2015,43, 376–387. [C ossRe ] [PubMed] [PubMed Cen al] 7. Zeng, X.; Lin, F.; Huang, W.; Kong, L.; Zeng, J.; Guo, D.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, D. Ch onic ACLD Knees wi h Ea ly De elopmen al Ca ilage Lesions Exhibi ed Inc eased Pos e io Tibial T ansla ion du ing Le el Walking. O hop. Su g. 2024,16, 1364–1373. [C ossRe ] [PubMed] [PubMed Cen al] 8. Pe y, J. Gai Analysis: No mal and Pa hological Func ion; SLACK: Tho o a e, NJ, USA, 1992. 9. G ay, H.A.; Guan, S.; Thomee , L.T.; Schache, A.G.; de S eige , R.; Pandy, M.G. Th ee-dimensional mo ion o he knee-join complex du ing no mal walking e ealed by mobile biplane X- ay imaging. J. O hop. Res. 2019,37, 615–630. [C ossRe ] 10. Koo, S.; And iacchi, T.P. The knee join cen e o o a ion is p edominan ly on he la e al side du ing no mal walking. J. Biomech. 2008,41, 1269–1273. [C ossRe ] [PubMed] 11. Kozanek, M.; Hosseini, A.; Liu, F.; Van de Velde, S.K.; Gill, T.J.; Rubash, H.E.; Li, G. Tibio emo al kinema ics and condyla mo ion du ing he s ance phase o gai . J. Biomech. 2009,42, 1877–1884. [C ossRe ] [PubMed] 12. Pos olka, B.; Schü z, P.; Fucen ese, S.F.; F eeman, M.A.R.; Pinske o a, V.; Lis , R.; Taylo , W.R. Tibio- emo al kinema ics o he heal hy knee join h oughou comple e cycles o gai ac i i ies. J. Biomech. 2020,110, 109915. [C ossRe ] [PubMed] 13. Hi anaka, T. Ad an ages and limi a ions o mobile-bea ing unicompa men al knee a h oplas y: An o e iew o he li e a u e. Expe Re . Med. De ices 2024, ahead o p in . [C ossRe ] [PubMed]