scieee Open visual document viewer

Measurement of the 244Cm and 246Cm neutron-induced capture cross sections at the n_TOF facility

Alcayne, V.,Ogállar Ruiz, Francisco,Praena Rodríguez, Antonio Javier,Porras Sánchez, José Ignacio

Abstract

The neutron capture reactions of the 244Cm and 246Cm isotopes open the path for the formation of heavier Cm isotopes and heavier elements such as Bk and Cf in a nuclear reactor. In addition, both isotopes belong to the minor actinides with a large contribution to the decay heat and to the neutron emission in irradiated fuels. There are only two previous 244Cm and 246Cm capture cross section measurements: one in 1969 using a nuclear explosion [1] and the most recent data measured at J-PARC in 2010 [2]. The data for both isotopes are very scarce due to the di culties in performing the measurements: high intrinsic activity of the samples and limited facilities capable of providing isotopically enriched samples. We have measured both neutron capture cross sections at the n_TOF Experimental Area 2 (EAR-2) with three C6D6 detectors and also at Area 1 (EAR-1) with the TAC. Preliminary results assessing the quality and limitations (background subtraction, measurement technique and counting statistics) of this new experimental datasets are presented and discussed.

Full text

Measu emen o he 244Cm and 246Cm neu on-induced cap- u e c oss sec ions a he n_TOF acili y V. Alcayne1, A. Kimu a2, E. Mendoza1, D. Cano-O 1, T. Ma ínez1, O. Abe le3, J. And zejewski4, L. Audouin5, V. Béca es1, M. Bacak3,6,7, M. Ba bagallo3,8, F. Beˇ c ᡠ9, G. Bellia10,11, E. Be houmieux7, J. Billowes12, D. Bosna 13, A. B own14, M. Busso8,15,16, M. Caamaño17, L. Caballe o-On anaya18, F. Cal iño19, M. Cal iani3, A. Casano as19, F. Ce u i3, Y. H. Chen5, E. Chia e i3,12,20, N. Colonna8, G. Co és19, M. A. Co és-Gi aldo20, L. Cosen ino10, S. C is allo8,15,21, L. A. Damone8,22, M. Diakaki23,3, M. Die z24, C. Domingo- Pa do18, R. D essle 25, E. Dupon 7, I. Du án17, Z. Eleme26, B. Fe nández-Domínguez17, A. Fe a i3, P. Finocchia o10, V. Fu man27, K. Göbel28, A. Gawlik4, S. Gila doni3, T. Gloda iu29, I. F. Gonçal es30, E. González-Rome o1, C. Gue e o20, F. Gunsing7, H. Ha ada2, S. Heini z25, J. Heyse31, D. G. Jenkins14, F. Käppele 32, Y. Kadi3, T. Ka abuchi33, N. Ki el25, I. Knapo a9, M. Kokko is23, Y. Kopa ch27, M. K iˇ cka9, D. Ku ulgil28, I. Lada escu18, C. Lede e -Woods24, J. Le endegui-Ma co20, S. Lo Meo34,35, S. J. Lonsdale24, D. Macina3, A. Manna35,36, A. Masi3, C. Massimi35,36, P. Mas inu37, M. Mas oma co3, F. Ma eucci38,39, E. A. Mauge i25, A. Mazzone8,40, A. Mengoni34, V. Michalopoulou23, P. M. Milazzo38, F. Ming one3, A. Musuma a10,11, A. Neg e 29, R. Nol e41, F. Ogálla 42, A. Op ea29, N. Pa onis26, A. Pa lik43, J. Pe kowski4, L. Pe san i8,15,21, I. Po as42, J. P aena42, J. M. Quesada20, D. Radeck41, D. Ramos-Do al5, T. Rausche 44,45, R. Rei a h28, D. Rochman25, M. Saba é-Gila e3,20, A. Saxena46, P. Schillebeeckx31, D. Schumann25, S. Simone10, A. G. Smi h12, N. V. Sosnin12, A. S ama opoulos23, G. Taglien e8, J. L. Tain18, T. Talip25, A. Ta i eño-Saldi ia19, L. Tassan-Go 3,23,5, A. Tsinganis3, J. Ul ich25, S. U lass3,47, S. Valen a9, G. Vannini35,36, V. Va iale8, P. Vaz30, A. Ven u a35, D. Vesco i8,15, V. Vlachoudis3, R. Vlas ou23, A. Wallne 48, P. J. Woods24, T. W igh 12, and P. Žugec13 1Cen o de In es igaciones Ene gé icas Medioambien ales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Spain 2Japan A omic Ene gy Agency (JAEA), Tokai-mu a, Japan 3Eu opean O ganiza ion o Nuclea Resea ch (CERN), Swi ze land 4Uni e si y o Lodz, Poland 5Ins i u de Physique Nucléai e, CNRS-IN2P3, Uni . Pa is-Sud, Uni e si é Pa is-Saclay, F-91406 O - say Cedex, F ance 6Technische Uni e si ä Wien, Aus ia 7CEA I u, Uni e si é Pa is-Saclay, F-91191 Gi -su -Y e e, F ance 8Is i u o Nazionale di Fisica Nuclea e, Sezione di Ba i, I aly 9Cha les Uni e si y, P ague, Czech Republic 10INFN Labo a o i Nazionali del Sud, Ca ania, I aly 11Dipa imen o di Fisica e As onomia, Uni e si à di Ca ania, I aly 12Uni e si y o Manches e , Uni ed Kingdom 13Depa men o Physics, Facul y o Science, Uni e si y o Zag eb, Zag eb, C oa ia 14Uni e si y o Yo k, Uni ed Kingdom 15Is i u o Nazionale di Fisica Nuclea e, Sezione di Pe ugia, I aly 16Dipa imen o di Fisica e Geologia, Uni e si à di Pe ugia, I aly 17Uni e si y o San iago de Compos ela, Spain 18Ins i u o de Física Co puscula , CSIC - Uni e sidad de Valencia, Spain ,(201 E Web o Con e ences h ps://doi.o g/10.1051/e on /20192 PJ pjc 9) 211 000811030 WONDER-2018 30 8 © The Au ho s, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access a icle dis ibu ed unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion License 4.0 (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/). 19Uni e si a Poli ècnica de Ca alunya, Spain 20Uni e sidad de Se illa, Spain 21Is i u o Nazionale di As o isica - Osse a o io As onomico di Te amo, I aly 22Dipa imen o di Fisica, Uni e si à degli S udi di Ba i, I aly 23Na ional Technical Uni e si y o A hens, G eece 24School o Physics and As onomy, Uni e si y o Edinbu gh, Uni ed Kingdom 25Paul Sche e Ins i u (PSI), Villingen, Swi ze land 26Uni e si y o Ioannina, G eece 27Join Ins i u e o Nuclea Resea ch (JINR), Dubna, Russia 28Goe he Uni e si y F ank u , Ge many 29Ho ia Hulubei Na ional Ins i u e o Physics and Nuclea Enginee ing, Romania 30Ins i u o Supe io Técnico, Lisbon, Po ugal 31Eu opean Commission, Join Resea ch Cen e, Geel, Re ieseweg 111, B-2440 Geel, Belgium 32Ka ls uhe Ins i u e o Technology, Campus No h, IKP, 76021 Ka ls uhe, Ge many 33Tokyo Ins i u e o Technology, Japan 34Agenzia nazionale pe le nuo e ecnologie (ENEA), Bologna, I aly 35Is i u o Nazionale di Fisica Nuclea e, Sezione di Bologna, I aly 36Dipa imen o di Fisica e As onomia, Uni e si à di Bologna, I aly 37Is i u o Nazionale di Fisica Nuclea e, Sezione di Legna o, I aly 38Is i u o Nazionale di Fisica Nuclea e, Sezione di T ies e, I aly 39Dipa imen o di As onomia, Uni e si à di T ies e, I aly 40Consiglio Nazionale delle Rice che, Ba i, I aly 41Physikalisch-Technische Bundesans al (PTB), Bundesallee 100, 38116 B aunschweig, Ge many 42Uni e si y o G anada, Spain 43Uni e si y o Vienna, Facul y o Physics, Vienna, Aus ia 44Depa men o Physics, Uni e si y o Basel, Swi ze land 45Cen e o As ophysics Resea ch, Uni e si y o He o dshi e, Uni ed Kingdom 46Bhabha A omic Resea ch Cen e (BARC), India 47Helmhol z-Zen um D esden-Rossendo , Ge many 48Aus alian Na ional Uni e si y, Canbe a, Aus alia Abs ac . The neu on cap u e eac ions o he 244Cm and 246Cm iso opes open he pa h o he o ma ion o hea ie Cm iso opes and hea ie elemen s such as Bk and C in a nuclea eac o . In addi ion, bo h iso opes belong o he mino ac inides wi h a la ge con ibu ion o he decay hea and o he neu on emission in i adia ed uels. The e a e only wo p e ious 244Cm and 246Cm cap u e c oss sec ion measu emen s: one in 1969 using a nuclea explosion [1] and he mos ecen da a measu ed a J-PARC in 2010 [2]. The da a o bo h iso opes a e e y sca ce due o he di icul ies in pe o ming he measu emen s: high in insic ac i i y o he samples and limi ed acili ies capable o p o iding iso opically en iched samples. We ha e measu ed bo h neu on cap u e c oss sec ions a he n_TOF Expe i- men al A ea 2 (EAR-2) wi h h ee C6D6de ec o s and also a A ea 1 (EAR-1) wi h he TAC. P elimina y esul s assessing he quali y and limi a ions (back- g ound sub ac ion, measu emen echnique and coun ing s a is ics) o his new expe imen al da ase s a e p esen ed and discussed. 1 In oduc ion Accu a e neu on cap u e c oss sec ion da a o mino ac inides (MAs) a e equi ed o es i- ma e he p oduc ion and ansmu a ion a es o MAs in ligh -wa e eac o s (LWR) wi h a high bu nup, c i ical as eac o s like Gen-IV sys ems and o he inno a i e de ices such as ,(201 E Web o Con e ences h ps://doi.o g/10.1051/e on /20192 PJ pjc 9) 211 000811030 WONDER-2018 30 8 2 accele a o d i en sys ems (ADS) [3]. The 244Cm (T1/2=18.1 yea s) and 246Cm (T1/2=4730 yea s) iso opes a e among he mos impo an MAs due o he di icul ies in hei ansmu a- ion and hei con ibu ion o he adio oxici y o he i adia ed nuclea uels. In pa icula , e en a e h ee yea s o cooling, 244Cm sha es nea ly 50% o he o al ac inide decay hea in i adia ed eac o uels wi h a high bu nup. In addi ion, bo h o hem a e in he pa h o he c ea ion o any hea ie Cm iso opes and hea ie elemen s like Bk and C . Only wo p e ious cap u e measu emen s we e done be o e he n_TOF measu emen s. The i s one, done in 1969 [1], used he neu ons p oduced in an unde -g ound nuclea explo- sion. The 244Cm (n,γ) c oss sec ion was measu ed in a ange om 20 eV o 1 keV and o he 246Cm(n,γ) om 20 eV o 400 eV. The second cap u e measu emen was pe o med in 2010 wi h a la ge co e age Ge-a ay in he Accu a e Neu on Nucleus Reac ion Measu e- men Ins umen (ANNRI) a J-PARC [2]. In his second measu emen he da a ob ained o bo h iso opes ange om 2 eV o 300 eV. The esonance analysis was done up o 30 eV. The sca ci y o he a ailable da a and he many expe imen al challenges in ol ed in he wo p e- ious measu emen s mo i a ed an addi ional measu emen unde di e en condi ions, i.e., in a di e en acili y, wi h di e en de ec o s and moni o s and wi h a di e en me hodology. 2 Expe imen The same samples used a J-PARC ha e been measu ed a n_TOF. In his acili y, he neu on beam is gene a ed h ough spalla ion o 20 GeV/c p o ons, which a e ex ac ed in pulses om he CERN P o on Synch o on and impinging on a lead a ge . The pulses ha e a nominal in ensi y o 7×1012 p o ons and a ime sp ead o 7 ns ( ms). The neu ons a el along wo beam lines owa ds he wo expe imen al a eas along : EAR-1 ligh leng h o 185 m [4] (ho izon al) and EAR-2 ligh leng h o 19 m [5] ( e ical). The neu on lux is la ge in he EAR-2 and he ene gy esolu ion is be e in he EAR-1. The samples ha e been measu ed in bo h expe imen al a eas. The measu emen in EAR-2 has been done wi h h ee C6D6de ec o s and he To al Ene gy De ec ion (TED) [6] echnique, and he measu emen in EAR-1 wi h he n_TOF To al Abso p ion Calo ime e (TAC) [7], designed o de ec he comple e γ- ay cascade. Measu ing in bo h expe imen al a eas wi h di e en de ec o s and echniques will allow o c osscheck esul s and, p esumably, o educe he inal unce ain ies. The a ge s used o he expe imen consis in wo samples o 244Cm and one o 246Cm. The e we e 0.4 mg o 244Cm in each o he 244Cm samples and 1.1 mg o 246Cm in he 246Cm sample. The iso opic abundances o he di e en ac inides a e p esen ed in Table 1. Table 1. Iso opic composi ion (% a oms) o he 244Cm and 246Cm samples. 244Cm sample 246Cm sample 244Cm 60.3±1.1 20.3±0.5 245Cm 2.4±0.3 1.1±0.3 246Cm 6.3±0.6 57.7±1.5 247Cm - 2.8±0.4 248Cm - 8.8±0.2 240Pu 31.0±0.6 9.3±0.2 2.1 Measu emen a he EAR-2 The h ee C6D6de ec o s we e placed a 5 cm om he sample and pe pendicula o he beam. In addi ion, h ee addi ional de ec o s we e used o moni o ing he beam. Two o ,(201 E Web o Con e ences h ps://doi.o g/10.1051/e on /20192 PJ pjc 9) 211 000811030 WONDER-2018 30 8 3 hem measu ed he in ensi y o he p o on beam. The hi d one was he SiMon [8], an a ay o ou silicon de ec o s acing a hin en iched li hium luo ide oil, o moni o ing he neu on beam. To ob ain accu a e weigh ing unc ions equi ed o he PHWT [9] echnique, a e y de ailed desc ip ion o he expe imen al se -up has been implemen ed in he Gean 4 oolki [10]. The simula ed esponse unc ions ha e been alida ed wi h expe imen al da a ob ained wi h se e al calib a ion sou ces ( 133Ba, 137Cs, 60Co, 88Y, AmBe and CmC). The geome y implemen ed in Gean 4 and one o he simula ed esponse unc ions a e shown in Figu e 1. The da a ob ained a n_TOF a e p ocessed wi h he Pulse Shape Analysis (PSA) ou ine [11]. (MeV) dep E 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 coun s/second/BinWid h 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 MC Exp-Backg ound Figu e 1. Geome y o he EAR-2 se up as implemen ed in Gean 4 (le ). Compa ison be ween simu- la ed (MC) and expe imen al esponse unc ion o an 88Y sou ce ( igh ). The esul s o he i s a e s o ed in ROOT iles [12]: signal ampli udes, signal a eas, imes, e c.. Also he con e sion om ime-o - ligh o neu on ene gy is done. Accu a e ampli ude- o-ene gy calib a ions and gain s abili y checks we e pe o med on a weekly basis o he h ee C6D6de ec o s using 133Ba, 137Cs, 60Co, 88Y, AmBe and CmC calib a ion sou ces. Small gain shi s ( 8%) a e obse ed and co ec ed as a unc ion o ime. The o al numbe o coun s as a unc ion o neu on ene gy measu ed wi h he Cm samples in place a e shown in Figu e 2. Also shown a e he es ima ed o al backg ound, he beam ela ed backg ound, and he no-beam ela ed backg ound. These backg ounds ha e been ob ained om dedica ed measu emen s. A p elimina y bu a he comple e analysis o he da a measu ed a he EAR-2 has been pe o med and wo p elimina y cap u e yields (no backg ound sub ac ed) ha e been ob- ained, one o he 244Cm samples and he o he o he 246Cm sample. Bo h yields (no backg ound sub ac ed) a e p esen ed in Figu e 3 oge he wi h he yields ob ained om he JEFF-3.3 [13] c oss sec ions wi h he expe imen al backg ound and he cha ac e is ics o he EAR-2 neu on beam (neu on lux + esolu ion unc ion)[14]. The ela i e di e ences be- ween he expe imen al and he e alua ed yields (in %) a e shown a he bo om o each panel, in eg a ed o each esonance. The esul s ha e been no malized o he i s la ge esonance o 240Pu a 1 eV. ,(201 E Web o Con e ences h ps://doi.o g/10.1051/e on /20192 PJ pjc 9) 211 000811030 WONDER-2018 30 8 4 Neu on ene gy(eV) 2− 10 1− 10 1 10 2 10 Coun s 4 10 5 10 Cm sample 244 Beam bkg. No beam bkg. To al bkg. Neu on ene gy(eV) 2− 10 1− 10 1 10 2 10 Coun s 4 10 5 10 Cm sample 246 Beam bkg. No beam bkg. To al bkg. Figu e 2. To al numbe o coun s (750 bins pe decade) and es ima ed backg ounds egis e ed in he 244Cm (le ) and 246Cm ( igh ) EAR-2 measu emen s. ,(201 E Web o Con e ences h ps://doi.o g/10.1051/e on /20192 PJ pjc 9) 211 000811030 WONDER-2018 30 8 5 (eV) n E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Cap u e Yield + bkg 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 Expe imen al Yield To al Sammy Yield )γPu-240 (n, )γCm-244 (n, )γCm-246 (n, Cm-244 (n, ) Cm - 1000 bins pe decade 244 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2− 1.5− 1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 (eV) n E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Cap u e Yield + bkg 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2 Expe imen al Yield To al Sammy Yield )γPu-240 (n, )γCm-244 (n, )γCm-246 (n, Cm-244 (n, ) Cm-245 (n, ) Cm-247 (n, ) )γCm-248 (n, )γAm-243 (n, Cm sample - 1000 bins pe decade 246 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15− 10− 5− 0 5 10 15 (eV) n E 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Cap u e Yield + bkg 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 3− 10× Expe imen al Yield To al Sammy Yield )γPu-240 (n, )γCm-244 (n, )γCm-246 (n, Cm-244 (n, ) Cm - 1000 bins pe decade 244 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 50− 40− 30− 20− 10− 0 10 20 30 40 50 (eV) n E 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Cap u e Yield + bkg 12 14 16 18 20 3− 10× Expe imen al Yield To al Sammy Yield )γPu-240 (n, )γCm-244 (n, )γCm-246 (n, Cm-244 (n, ) Cm-245 (n, ) Cm-247 (n, ) )γCm-248 (n, )γAm-243 (n, Expe imen al Yield To al Sammy Yield )γPu-240 (n, )γCm-244 (n, )γCm-246 (n, Cm-244 (n, ) Cm-245 (n, ) Cm-247 (n, ) )γCm-248 (n, )γAm-243 (n, Cm sample - 1000 bins pe decade 246 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 15− 10− 5− 0 5 10 15 (eV) n E 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Cap u e Yield + bkg 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 3− 10× Expe imen al Yield To al Sammy Yield )γPu-240 (n, )γCm-244 (n, )γCm-246 (n, Cm-244 (n, ) Cm - 750 bins pe decade 244 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 60− 40− 20− 0 20 40 60 (eV) n E 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Cap u e Yield + bkg 10 12 14 16 18 3− 10× Expe imen al Yield To al Sammy Yield )γPu-240 (n, )γCm-244 (n, )γCm-246 (n, Cm-244 (n, ) Cm-245 (n, ) Cm-247 (n, ) )γCm-248 (n, )γAm-243 (n, Expe imen al Yield To al Sammy Yield )γPu-240 (n, )γCm-244 (n, )γCm-246 (n, Cm-244 (n, ) Cm-245 (n, ) Cm-247 (n, ) )γCm-248 (n, )γAm-243 (n, Cm sample - 750 bins pe decade 246 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 60− 40− 20− 0 20 40 60 Figu e 3. P elimina y expe imen al yields (no backg ound sub ac ed) o he measu ed 244Cm (le ) and 246Cm ( igh ) samples. Toge he wi h he expe imen al da a poin s, we show an es ima ion o he con ibu ion o he cap u e and ission eac ions in each iso ope p esen in he samples. These con ibu- ions ha e been ob ained using he SAMMY compu e code o calcula e he eac ion yields aking in o accoun he expe imen al condi ions such as Dopple and esolu ion b oadening, and aking he eac ion c oss sec ions om JEFF-3.3. The esul ing yields we e hen no malized o i he expe imen al esul s and added o he backg ound, ob ained om dedica ed measu emen s. ,(201 E Web o Con e ences h ps://doi.o g/10.1051/e on /20192 PJ pjc 9) 211 000811030 WONDER-2018 30 8 6 2.2 Measu emen a he EAR-1 The measu emen in EAR-1 was pe o med wi h he TAC, which is an a ay o 40 BaF2 c ys als designed o de ec he ull cap u e γ- ay cascades. The da a analysis is ongoing and i will ollow simila p ocedu es han he ones pe o med in p e ious TAC expe imen s [15] [16]. Signals a e g ouped in o TAC e en s wi h a 20 ns coincidence window, and cu s in o al deposi ed ene gy and de ec ion mul iplici y allow o imp o e he signal o backg ound a io. The o al numbe o coun s as a unc ion o neu on ene gy measu ed wi h he 244Cm samples in place a e shown in Figu e 4, oge he wi h he es ima ed backg ounds. The be e ene gy esolu ion and smalle ins an aneous neu on luence in EAR-1 esul s in a na owe esonan s uc u e and a la ge con ibu ion o he no-beam ela ed backg ound. Neu on ene gy(eV) 1 10 2 10 Coun s 2 10 3 10 4 10 Cm sample 244 Beam bkg. No beam bkg. To al bkg. Figu e 4. To al numbe o coun s (1000 bins pe decade) and es ima ed backg ounds egis e ed in he 244Cm EAR-1 measu emen . 3 Conclusions The cap u e c oss sec ions o 244Cm and 246Cm a e equi ed o es ima e he p oduc ion and ansmu a ion a es o MAs in LWR and also o new eac o ypes. The e a e only wo p e ious cap u e measu emen s o hese wo iso opes, bo h o hem wi h many expe imen- al di icul ies.The e o e, a new measu emen has been pe o med a n_TOF using he wo expe imen al a eas and p elimina y cap u e yields ha e been ob ained. Re e ences [1] M. S. Moo e e . al., Phys. Re . C, 3, 1656 (1971) [2] A. Kimu a e . al., Jou . Nucl. Sc. Tech. 49, 708 (2012) [3] G. Alibe i e . al., , Ann. Nucl. Ene . 33, 700 (2006) [4] C. Gue e o e al., Eu . Phys. J. A 49, 27 (2013) [5] C. Weiss e al., Nucl. Ins um. Me h. A 799, 90 (2015) [6] R.L. Macklin and J.H. Gibbons,Phys. Re . 159, 1007 (1967) [7] C.Gue e o e al., Nucl. Ins um. Me h. A 608, 424 (2009) [8] S. Ma one e al., Nucl. Ins um. Me h. A 517, 389 (2004) ,(201 E Web o Con e ences h ps://doi.o g/10.1051/e on /20192 PJ pjc 9) 211 000811030 WONDER-2018 30 8 7 [9] Abondano e al., Nucl. Ins um. Me h. A 521, 454 (2004) [10] S. Agos inelli e al., Nucl. Ins um. Me h. A 506, 250 (2003) [11] P. Žugec e al., Nucl. Ins um. Me h. A 812, 134 (2016) [12] h ps:// oo .ce n.ch/ [13] A. Koning e al., J. Ko ean Phys. Soc. 59, 1057 (2011); The JEFF lib a y is a ailable om h ps://www.oecd-nea.o g/dbda a/je [14] M. Saba é-Gila e e al., Eu . Phys. J 53, 10 (2017) [15] C. Gue e o e al., Phys. Re . C 85, 044616 (2012) [16] E. Mendoza e al., Phys. Re . C 90, 034608 (2014) ,(201 E Web o Con e ences h ps://doi.o g/10.1051/e on /20192 PJ pjc 9) 211 000811030 WONDER-2018 30 8 8