scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Grief Experiences in Family Caregivers of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)

Bravo Benítez, Jorge,Pérez Marfil, María Nieves,Román Alegre, Belén,Cruz Quintana, Francisco

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to analyse the experience of grief and feelings of loss in family caregivers of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), as well as the perceived overload from taking on the primary caregiver role. Twenty family caregivers of children with ASD participated. The family members were assessed using an ad-hoc semi-structured interview that addressed the families’ reactions to the diagnosis, implications for daily functioning, and concerns for the immediate and long-term future of their relatives with ASD. The results indicate that family caregivers of children with ASD endure intense and continuous sorrow and grief due to the impact that having and caring for a child with these characteristics has on all aspects of their lives. These data highlight the importance of creating support and intervention programmes and services focused on the feelings and manifestations of ambiguous grief that occur in these family members, in order to improve their well-being and quality of life and reduce caregiver role overload.

Full text

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Grief Experiences in Family Caregivers of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Jorge Bravo-Benítez 1, María Nieves Pérez-Marfil 1,* , Belén Román-Alegre 2 and Francisco Cruz-Quintana 1 1Mind, Brain and Behaviour Research Centre (CIMCYC), University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain; [email protected].es (J.B.-B.); [email protected] (F.C.-Q.) 2Department of Psychology, University of Cádiz, 11001 Cádiz, Spain; [email protected] *Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 23 October 2019; Accepted: 28 November 2019; Published: 30 November 2019   Abstract: The main objective of this study was to analyse the experience of grief and feelings of loss in family caregivers of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), as well as the perceived overload from taking on the primary caregiver role. Twenty family caregivers of children with ASD participated. The family members were assessed using an ad-hoc semi-structured interview that addressed the families’ reactions to the diagnosis, implications for daily functioning, and concerns for the immediate and long-term future of their relatives with ASD. The results indicate that family caregivers of children with ASD endure intense and continuous sorrow and grief due to the impact that having and caring for a child with these characteristics has on all aspects of their lives. These data highlight the importance of creating support and intervention programmes and services focused on the feelings and manifestations of ambiguous grief that occur in these family members, in order to improve their well-being and quality of life and reduce caregiver role overload. Keywords: ambiguous grief; sorrow; ASD; caregivers 1. Introduction An estimated 1 in 160 children has an autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This is the estimated mean, as the observed prevalence varies considerably across studies, with well-controlled studies reporting considerably higher figures [ 1 ]. According to epidemiological studies conducted over the past 50 years, the global prevalence of these disorders seems to be increasing. Some possible explanations for this apparent increase have been suggested, including greater awareness, broader diagnostic criteria, better diagnostic tools, and improved communication among professionals [1]. ASDs are a range of mental disorders of the neurodevelopmental type that appear at an early age and are characterised by difficulties in social interaction, communication, and flexibility, among others [ 2 ]. People with ASD have complex care needs and require a range of integrated services, including health promotion, personalised care, rehabilitation services, and collaboration with other sectors, such as the educational, occupational, and social sectors [1]. Planning the needs discussed above starts with one of the key moments: informing the family of the diagnosis. When a family receives an ASD diagnosis of one of its members, a very painful assimilation process ensues, which experts compare to a grieving process, in this case, grief over the loss of a “typical child” [3]. Raising a child with ASD is a challenge for parents, who, after coming to terms with the diagnosis, must begin to implement adaptive strategies that favour the development of their children and the family as a whole [ 4 ]. This situation is complex and has been associated with an important change in family dynamics [ 5 , 6 ]. Raising a child with ASD often entails an emotional and financial burden for Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 4821; doi:10.3390/ijerph16234821 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 4821 2 of 18 families, and caring for children with severe cases of ASD can be demanding, especially when access to services and support is inadequate [1]. Researchers have emphasised the occurrence of physical and emotional health problems and high levels of caregiver overload in these children’s parents [ 7 – 11 ]. Parental feelings of disbelief, distress, anxiety, or sadness are common at the time of diagnosis and in the following months [ 12 ]. Numerous studies show that these parents often experience higher levels of stress, depression, anxiety, and lower quality of life than parents of children with other types of disabilities, such as Down syndrome, or typically developing children [13–16]. Another consequence of the child-rearing process is the isolation of caregivers, especially the primary caregivers, who are mostly mothers [ 17 ]. This isolation is often reinforced because caregivers, trying to prevent stigmatisation, avoid any social interaction [ 18 ]. In addition, caregivers often have higher levels of stress and overload due to the responsibility acquired, thus experiencing feelings of guilt, which are increased when facing criticism from those in their immediate environment when there are problems regarding the child’s upbringing [11]. An important part of the emotional response of these families is associated with feelings of loss or grief [ 19 , 20 ]. Accordingly, Ponte et al. [ 21 ] reported that parents experience emotional pain due to the loss of their ideal child and the disruption of their expectations, as well as shock and/or helplessness in family members after diagnosis. Several concepts have been proposed to explain the dynamics experienced by these families in these cases. Among these is the concept of ambiguous loss [ 22 , 23 ]. O’Brien [ 19 ] relates this concept to several factors, such as uncertain diagnoses and prognoses, variable daily functioning, seemingly normal development of the child during the first years, manifestation of only some symptoms, and the difficulty of these children in recognising and expressing their emotions. Parents may experience grief over the loss of their “expected child” and find it difficult to accept the reality [ 24 , 25 ]. Parents’ grieving reactions to an ASD diagnosis have also been considered to be a type of “chronic sorrow” [26] and “non-finite grief” [27]. Other authors have adapted the concept of “ambiguous loss” in order to include a fundamental characteristic of this type of circumstance, in which the child, although physically present, appears to be emotionally absent or distant [ 23 ]. In this context, Olshansky [ 26 ] defines the concept of chronic sorrow as a “profound sadness,” referring to the sadness felt by the parents of children with mental disabilities [ 28 ]. Boss [ 23 ], in turn, describes ambiguous loss as an “incomplete and uncertain loss” which occurs in two different ways: the family member may be physically present and psychologically absent, or physically absent and psychologically present. Finally, Bruce and Schultz [ 29 ] propose the concept of unresolved or non-finite grief to describe families experiencing loss due to chronic illness, disability, or accident. These authors found that families did not experience the stages of bereavement only once; rather, they continually revisited the different stages again and again, especially when faced with developmental milestones that were not being reached by their children [27]. There are few recent studies exploring grieving reactions of parents of children with ASD [ 28 , 30 – 32 ] that have used grounded theory to analyse parents’ feelings of sorrow and loss, a relevant issue given the considerable emotional adjustment that these parents have to undergo [ 6 ]. These feelings could be related to receiving the diagnosis, hopes for the child’s development, how they perceive positive aspects of the child’s education [ 33 ], and different coping styles [ 34 , 35 ]. Interventions to support these parents require knowledge of their emotional state in order to plan and implement programmes adapted to their real needs. The main objective of this study is to analyse the experience of grief and feelings of loss in family members of children diagnosed with ASD, as well as the perceived overload of taking on the primary caregiver role. Identifying this type of loss, as well as the associated emotions and barriers to processing it, is an essential step towards preventing this grief from becoming chronic. This information, together with the information on caregiver overload, could be of great utility in designing programmes to address the specific needs of this population. The specific objective was to analyse the following: the manifestations of grief in the relatives of individuals with ASD; their reactions to the diagnosis Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 4821 3 of 18 (associated thoughts and emotions); and how this has affected their lives (family, work, social, as well as relationships and personal changes). 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Participants The study involved 20 family members (4 men and 16 women) who are the primary caregivers of individuals with ASD. These individuals were either users of two mental health clinics in the provinces of C á diz and Granada, Spain, or members of an association of relatives of individuals with ASD in C á diz. The median age of these individuals was 40.00 years (range: 31–68). Two of the caregivers had completed only basic education, twelve had secondary education, and six had higher education. Fifteen of the participants were married, three were separated/divorced, one was single, and one was widowed. Regarding their employment status, 10 were employed, eight were unemployed, and two were engaged in household chores. The age range of the children at the time of the study was from 6 to 12 years of age (mode =8). All of the children were attending school and lived with their original families (15 with both of their parents and 5 with their mothers) (see Table 1). Table 1. Socio-demographic data of the participants. Subject Sex Age Level of Education Marital Status Employment Status 01 Female 36 Secondary education or vocational training Married Unemployed 02 Female 32 Secondary education or vocational training Married Unemployed 03 Female 40 Secondary education or vocational training Separated/divorced Unemployed 04 Female 40 Secondary education or vocational training Married Employed 05 Female 57 Secondary education or vocational training Widow Employed 06 Female 45 Graduate Separated/divorced Unemployed 07 Female 42 University studies Married Employed 08 Female 31 Secondary education or vocational training Married Unemployed 09 Female 40 Secondary education or vocational training Married Unemployed 10 Female 48 Secondary education or vocational training Married Employed 11 Male 37 Graduate Married Employed 12 Male 35 Secondary education or vocational training Married Employed 13 Female 45 Basic education Married Unemployed 14 Female 30 Secondary education or vocational training Single Employed 15 Male 40 Basic education Married Unemployed 16 Female 40 University studies Separated/divorced Employed 17 Female 68 Secondary education or vocational training Married Household chores 18 Female 40 Secondary education or vocational training Married Household chores 19 Female 43 Graduate Married Employed 20 Male 45 University studies Married Employed Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 4821 4 of 18 In the present study, the children’s median age at which the parents were informed of the diagnosis of ASD was 30.00 months (range: 17–132). The professional who communicated the diagnosis was a psychologist on 10occasions.Medical professionals (psychiatrist, neuropaediatrician, paediatrician, neurologist, and general practitioner) communicated the diagnosis on eight occasions. The diagnosishad been communicated by a counsellor in one case only. Only one individual in the sample reported having discovered the diagnosis themselves, without being informed by third parties (see Table 2). Table 2. Children’s ages, in months, at which the diagnosis was communicated to their family members and the professionals who communicated it. Subject Age (months) Professional 01 36 Psychologist 02 24 Psychiatrist 03 27 Psychologist 04 18 Herself 05 54 Psychologist 06 23 Psychologist 07 17 Neuropaediatrician 08 18 Psychologist 09 132 Counsellor 10 120 Psychologist 11 18 Paediatrician 12 24 Psychologist 13 42 Neurologist 14 36 General practitioner 15 24 Psychologist 16 30 Psychiatrist 17 - Neurologist 18 84 Psychiatrist 19 60 Psychologist 20 66 Psychologist 2.2. Instruments Family members were assessed using an ad-hoc semi-structured interview that addressed family reactions to the diagnosis, implications for daily functioning, and concerns for the immediate and long-term future of their family members with ASD. Subsequently, family members were interviewed. All of the interviews were conducted by the same trained researcher, specialized in the field of health psychology, on the mental health clinics and associations’ premises, in a quiet environment ensuring privacy. The interviewer is an expert in qualitative methodology. In addition, a pilot study was conducted, which consisted of interviewing two professionals from the participating centres. The one-to-one interviews were semi-structured and largely based on previous research in the area. Although the main aim of the interview was to explore patterns in going through the grieving process, it seemed sensitive to gather further data on other issues, such as information about the moment of receiving the diagnosis, the caregiver’s overload or the change in future expectations. Table 3shows the general framework of the four sections in which the interview was structured. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 4821 5 of 18 Table 3. Sections of the semi-structured interview. Section 1:Diagnosis Who communicated the diagnosis to the relative? At what age? How did you feel at the moment you were communicated? What were your reactions? What concerns came to mind? Section 2:Loss and grieving process Interference in work, leisure, friendship, family, care people and relationship, health, welfare in general. Associated emotions. Perceived losses. Section 3:Caregiver overload Activities that you used to do and have stopped doing now. Do you spend time for yourself? How much per week and how? How has it affected family dynamics? Section 4:Future Has your vision changed about the future of your family member due to diagnosis? Could you explain it? 2.3. Procedure Firstly, the management teams of the different centres were contacted in order to present them with the research objectives and ask for their collaboration. Once approved, the study was disseminated by means of a dedicated website and leaflets, as well as by the participating centres. Centre staffs were informed of the research objectives and they subsequently contacted the participants. The participants were called to a meeting where the principal investigator informed them about the study and answered their questions. Interested individuals signed the informed consent form. They were also provided with a copy of the protocol for handling of personal data. In the information sheet, participants were provided with general data of the research, the voluntary nature of the participation, the commitment acquired when participating, possible risks and benefits for the participant, the confidential nature of the data, the rights of the participant, and the data of contact of the main researcher. Subsequently, family members were interviewed. All of the interviews were conducted on the mental health clinics’ and associations’ premises, in a quiet environment ensuring privacy. The duration of the interviews was variable, the mean being around 30 minutes. The procedure included providing emotional support after the interview to the family members who needed it or requested it. However, in no case was it necessary to do so. Each of the family members was assigned a numerical code. To preserve their anonymity, their names were not transcribed. The study had been approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Granada (Ref: 359/CEIH/2017). 2.4. Data Analysis A qualitative design was used based on the grounded theory of Glaser and Strauss [36]. The analysis of the interview data was carried out with Atlas.ti v.7 (Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany). The interviews were recorded on paper, taped, and then digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim using f4 software. The main ideas present in these data were then underlined, coded, and grouped into categories. Finally, the hierarchical relationships of the codes and families were created, building a network map. Specifically, a method of constant comparison was used, organized into three stages, adapting the proposal of Strauss, Corbin and Zimmerman [ 37 ] to the present research objectives. First, an inductive strategy was used in which fragments of the participants’ discourse were analysed and codified (micro-analysis). The properties of each code were later described and delimited, allowing for comparison among them. Names for these codes were selected based on expressions in the participants’ discourse. This step represented the open coding stage, in which four researchers participated. The different codes were named and defined by consensus. In cases of disagreement, debate among the researchers and a review of the literature were conducted to ensure that each code was as close as possible to the experience of the participants. Second, the identified codes (see Table 4) were Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 4821 6 of 18 grouped into categories according to their characteristics. These categories were derived from the participants’ discourses and were created by comparing cases and merging codes. The most complex categories were organized into subordinate concepts or sub-categories (axial coding). The same strategy as in the previous analytic phase was adopted for grouping the codes. Finally, the categories obtained were integrated, and hierarchical relations were discussed. A central (core) category was identified and the most important codes were used to build a theoretical framework to explain the phenomenon. A core category must be related to other categories, must appear frequently in the data, and must provide a coherent explanation of the data [ 37 ]. Later, the theory was refined using strategies of constant comparison. The final model was submitted to triangulation among all of the investigators to ensure its suitability for the phenomenon under study. This final stage corresponds to selective coding as described by [ 37 ]. The interviews were transcribed by the researchers with wide experience in qualitative investigation. The analysis was performed using the original Spanish interviews. The quotations selected for inclusion in this article were independently translated by two experienced professional translators (English-native and Spanish-native), who then produced a jointly-agreed version that was further reviewed by two of the authors (both fluent in English) to ensure that the meaning of the original was accurately conveyed. Table 4. Themes identified and associated with the grieving experience of family caregivers after receiving the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). DiagnosticProcess Grief Process Stress and Overload Anticipation Reaction to the diagnosis Discontinued activities and time for oneself Age of the child Disruption of expectations Changes in family dynamics Professional who communicated the diagnosis Experience of grief Feelings of loss/gain 3. Results Table 4shows the identified themes associated with the grieving experience of family caregivers of people diagnosed with ASD: anticipation, the children’s age, professional who communicated the diagnosis, reaction to the diagnosis, disruption of expectations, experience of grief, discontinued activities and time for oneself, changes in family dynamics, and feelings of loss/gain. These themes were coded and grouped into three categories: diagnostic processes, grief processes, and stress and overload. 3.1. Codes Grouped under The “Diagnostic Process” Category 3.1.1. Anticipation A child’s acquisition of different psychomotor, cognitive, social, and linguistic skills is something the family looks forward to during the child’s first years of life. Families usually know the normotypical age at which the different developmental milestones are reached, sometimes comparing the child’s development with that of another child of a similar age, or with a older sibling. Most of the mothers had already been observing certain signs that made them suspect and/or become alerted to the possibility that the child might be affected by some disorder. Consequently, they had been expecting it by the time the diagnosis was communicated to them. In these cases, this anticipation cushioned the impact of the diagnosis. “I already knew, I saw things in my son, so I expected it.” (06-Mother) “At 18 months, but I knew since he was born.” (08-Mother) “B. His wife had already noticed since he was a very young boy. She knew that something was wrong with him [ . . . ]. It was a major blow, but I already imagined it because I saw it. Because he had been doing very weird things since he was a little boy” (12-Father) “It was kind of what we had been expecting. It was not a slap in the face because we had suspected it” (15-Father). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 4821 7 of 18 3.1.2. Age and Professional Who Communicated the Diagnosis ASD is usually detected before the age of 3. It is therefore common for family members to begin searching for explanations of the warning signs they see in their child before this age. This search usually involves seeking advice from different child health professionals (psychologists and paediatricians, mainly) on the child’s development, and concludes when the diagnosis of ASD is confirmed by the professional. 3.2. Codes Grouped under The “Grief Process” Category 3.2.1. Reaction to The Diagnosis Receiving such a diagnosis is usually not easy, and it goes without saying that this is always coupled with an emotional response. The different reactions to a diagnosis can be shaped by various factors, such as the coping skills of family members, predictability, prognosis, severity, and availability and knowledge of social and financial resources. The families of the children with ASD expressed having experienced intense emotions at the time of diagnosis. The reactions they described of that moment were diverse, ranging from a state of shock to a proactive and resilient attitude, through phases of denial, guilt, anger, and helplessness (see Table 5). Table 5. Quotations associated with reactions to the diagnosis. Subcode Quotations from the Participants Shock “In shock. The stereotype of autism that I had was more exaggerated, so I didn’t think my son had this.” (07-Mother) “I didn’t know how to react, I was shocked. I didn’t know what to do, or how to act, or... this is horrible... unbearable...” (17-Grandmother) Denial “Petrified. I thought: This is not happening to me. And then I thought: Why me? What will become of my son?” (05-Mother) Guilt “My world fell apart.It crossed my mind whether I had been a good mother.” (09-Mother) Anger “I felt an intense rage and then frustration afterwards: Why me? I felt helpless not knowing how to deal with the situation... uncertainty.” (11-Father) “Awful, I don’t want to say it because I’m going to cry. I felt rage... why did this happen to me?!” (18-Mother) Proactive attitude “I felt like I wanted to fight. I thought: now that I know what my child’s got, we’re going to work on this. I reacted proactively. I got down to work: looking for information and resources everywhere. I avoid standing still.” (03-Mother) “I felt that you have to try harder, press harder, and take more care of the situation.” (20-Father) 3.2.2. Disruption of Expectations: Differences Regarding the Children’s Future. There was great homogeneity with respect to the disruption of expectations, specifically with respect to how family members expected their child’s future to be before the diagnosis and how they believe it will be after the diagnosis. At the time of pregnancy or during the first year of life, the families of children with ASD did not imagine that their child would receive this diagnosis. As a result, they imagined a normally developing child with an ideal future during this time. These expectations disappear the moment they become aware of the full implications of the diagnosis. We observed different emotional reactions in parents to this mismatch between the ideal and the real. Concern and uncertainty were the most frequent emotions among the sample of family members. Both emotions seem to be related to the ambiguity about the prognosis and the future of the child. In particular, the main concern of relatives was the independence and autonomy of the child with ASD (see Table 6). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 4821 8 of 18 Table 6. Main quotations on the expectations for the future of the child in the past and in the present. Emotion Quotations Concern and uncertainty “A healthy girl who would run and jump, happily. Now I don’t know, I’m not quite sure. Her autonomy is what worries me the most.” (01-Mother) “Now his future is a question mark. It depends on his progress. What I want is for him to be independent and to be able to lead a life like everybody else.” (02-Mother) “Now I’m very worried about my son’s future. That’s what worries me the most, if he will be able to become independent, autonomous. I’m worried that society will take advantage of him [ . . . ]. I’m very concerned that there will be no more resources for him, that there are finite resources.” (07-Mother) “A normal future, with a job... Now I really don’t know. That’s what worries me the most.” (09-Mother) “Very different. I imagined that I was going to be able to talk to him, that I was going to teach him my stuff, sports... and that he was going to have an education. Now, I really don’t know what’s going to happen, if he can’t speak...” (12-Mother) “I didn’t used to think much about the future, but I imagined him beingwell, happy. Now I don’t know, I’m hopeless. Sometimes I think about giving him a sibling, but I’m afraid.” (14-Mother) “The usual... where is he going to study? Will I teach him English?... The usual... Now, I’m scared and you think what will become of him when I’m gone...? The million dollar question.” (16-Mother) “With my wife, several children, a simple life, and making a living. Now it hurts because I wanted to have another child and take more care of them. And I’m concerned for the day we are gone.” (20-Father) Disappointment “We all expect to have a perfect child, and that’s the letdown we get. Because that’s the child we lose.” (04-Mother) “I thought that he would be a university student, that he would play football, be a good person, an athlete... now I think of him as totally dependent, always asking to have good people around to take care of him.” (05-Mother) “Before, when he was younger, it came to mind a lot what it would be like without the diagnosis. I really wanted to have a child to enjoy it: when they started to walk, to talk... and I’ve been left with the desire to enjoy my son’s normal early stages.”(07-Mother) “I thought that he’d be an amusing kid, very talkative . . . a little rascal” (08-Mother) “I wanted some intellectually gifted children, super clever, and now what... My friends, with their children, who are super good at something whereas mine, what... well...” (13-Mother) “[ . . . ] that now you have to be dedicated to him for everything, I imagined him on a motorbike and now... you see... not anymore.” (15-Father) “Like everybody else, I wanted to have three children, very nice, like everybody else... my studios arein Madrid... And now I’m gloomy, always with my son, he is totally dependent and I don’t trust anyone.” (18-Mother) Resignation “I pictured him studying, with his friends, with his girlfriend... a normal life. Now, I don’t even think about the future, what for?” (06-Mother) “Well, having my grandson, pampering him, taking him to the streets, to the cinema, drawings... talking to him... now I don’t have a future, I don’t want to think about it, it scares me so much...” (17-Grandmother) Optimism “I wanted my children to travel, to be independent, to go to university... to be free people. Now I think the same way, or at least I hope so. It’s improving a lot.” (04-Mother) “Like anyone else: university studies, football... now I still think the same way, or I’d like to think the same way. Instead of football, chess... let him be happy with whatever it is. If instead of football he likes to learn the roads, so be it.” (11-Father) Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 4821 9 of 18 3.2.3. Grieving Experience The experiences of diagnosis-related grief in the families of children with ASD who participated in this study are varied. Most family members view the process of assimilating their child’s diagnosis as an experience as intense as grieving over the death of a family member, or even more painful, because of the lack of predictability and the uncertainty about the future. Other family members, on the other hand, highlight that the difference between grieving for the death of a loved one and grieving for a diagnosis of ASD lies in the cyclical nature of the latter, which is characterised by a fluctuation of painful emotions, such as anguish and sadness, and periods of acceptance and happiness. Other family members report that this feeling of loss is caused by the difference between the expected child and the real child. Although after receiving the diagnosis the child with ASD does not actually die, the “healthy” child with whom they had been living until that moment is gone. For others, grief is related to a chronic sorrow, an “endless, living sorrow.” Finally, other family members experience this as an ambiguous loss, because they feel as if the child has been taken away from them and that the child may never speak to them (see Table 7). Table 7. Main quotations about feelings and experiences related to grief. Emotion Quotations Unresolved grief “For me the grief is worse now than at the time of diagnosis, because I see how L. is and I’m worried about the future.” (01-Mother) “It’s been worse for me. Because when I lost my parents, it hurt, but it’s something I had accepted would happen. But not this.” (05-Mother) “Yes, to me it’s something similar. I keep experiencing it inside. I experienced it in this way: they give you the diagnosis and you have to ride it out. I made sure I didn’t have time to grieve by looking for therapies and resources everywhere.” (11-Father) Cyclical grief “It’s not the same to me. Grieving for a diagnosis of ASD is a cycle of grief that you enter and exit continuously. Each stage of the child’s development makes you worry about some things and it makes you grieve again.” (07-Mother) “Yes, it’s similar. It changes everything for you. It’s as though I had to learn everything from him. I have to learn to deal with him. And then there are days when you just can’t accept that your child has ASD. You have ups and downs. The grief goes up and down, up and down.” (08-Mother) Grieving for the loss of the expected child “Yes, it’s not the same because the person is there, but it’s not what you had in mind. When you consider having a child, you don’t expect this. And I really thought about it.” (01-Mother) “Yes, it’s as if you’ve lost your child. We all expect to have a perfect child, and that’s the letdown we get. Because that’s the child we lose” (04-Mother) “It may resemble something like that, because what you imagine when you’re having a baby vanishes, so it’s like you’re losing something of yourself.” (12-Mother) “It’s not like a bereavement, no. It’s like... now what? Uncertainty. I wanted to have intellectually gifted children, super clever, and now what? . . . ” (13-Mother) Chronic sorrow orlatent grief “It’s very similar, but it’s more painful. Because when you lose someone you learn to live without them, and now you learn to live with them, it’s exactly the opposite.” (06-Mother) “No, not so much, but I’m always trying to make sure that he does not suffer, that people don’t deceive him... it hurts so much that I have inappropriate outbursts at times.” (10-Mother) “No, it felt worse than the death of a loved one. My father died, I have already experienced that, but this is worse than the death of a loved one. It’s like a living sorrow. It never ends.” (16-Mother) “No, I feel it more (worse)... because this is not sorrow, it’s... just that it leaves you empty, a very big void... there is sorrow here, there is no satisfaction... a very big sorrow in your soul.” (17-Mother) Ambiguous loss “I didn’t experience it that way. Although it is as though he had been taken away from me. After the vaccinations, he stopped looking at me, talking to me... everything. Before, he used to do it.” (03-Mother) “No, the feeling is that your son is never going to talk to you. It’s a weird feeling, I haven’t experienced anything similar, but it’s not comparable to the loss of a loved one.” (15-Father) Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 4821 16 of 18 14. Dabrowska, A.; Pisula, E. Parenting stress and coping styles in mothers and fathers of pre-school children with autism and Down syndrome. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 2010,54, 266–280. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 15. Pottie, C.G.; Ingram, K.M. Daily stress, coping, and well-being in parents of children with autism: A multilevel modeling approach. J. Fam. Psychol. 2008,22, 855–864. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 16. Vasilopoulou, E.; Nisbet, J. The quality of life of parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 2016,23, 36–49. [CrossRef] 17. Bromley, J.; Hare, D.J.; Davison, K.; Emerson, E. Mothers supporting children with autistic spectrum disorders: Social support, mental health status and satisfaction with services. Autism 2004 ,8, 409–423. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 18. Woodgate, R.L.; Ateah, C.; Secco, L. Living in a world of our own: The experience of parents who have a child with autism. Qual. Health Res. 2008,18, 1075–1083. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 19. O’Brien, M. Ambiguous loss in families of children with autism spectrum disorders. Fam. Relat. 2007,56, 135–146. [CrossRef] 20. Mulligan, J.; MacCulloch, R.; Good, B.; Nicholas, D.B. Transparency, hope, and empowerment: A model for partnering with parents of a child with autism spectrum disorder at diagnosis and beyond. Soc. Work Ment. Health 2012,10, 311–330. [CrossRef] 21. Ponte, J.; Perpiñ á n, S.; Mayo, M.E.; Mill á , M.G.; Pegenaute, F.; Poch-Oliv é , M.L. Estudio sobre los procedimientos profesionales, las vivencias y las necesidades de los padres cuando se les informa de que su hijo tiene una discapacidad o un trastorno del desarrollo. La primera noticia. Rev. Neurol. 2012,54, 3–9. 22. Boss, P. Ambiguous loss research, theory, and practice: Reflections after 9/11. J. Marriage Fam. 2004 ,66, 551–566. [CrossRef] 23. Boss, P. Ambiguous Loss: Learning to Live with Unresolved Grief; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999. 24. Casey, L.B.; Zanksas, S.; Meindl, J.N.; Parra, G.R.; Cogdal, P.; Powell, K. Parental symptoms of posttraumatic stress following a child’s diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: A pilot study. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 2012,6, 1186–1193. [CrossRef] 25. Heiman, T. Parents of children with disabilities: Resilience, coping, and future expectations. J. Dev. Phys. Disabil. 2002,14, 159–171. [CrossRef] 26. Olshansky, S. Chronic sorrow: A response to having a mentally defective child. Soc. Casework 1962 ,43, 190–193. [CrossRef] 27. Rarity, J.C. Nonfinite Grief in Families with Children on the Autism Spectrum; ProQuest: San Antonio, TX, USA, 2007. 28. Patrick-Ott, A.; Ladd, L.D. The blending of Boss’s concept of ambiguous loss and Olshansky’s concept of chronic sorrow: A case study of a family with a child who has significant disabilities. J. Creat. Ment. Health 2010,5, 73–86. [CrossRef] 29. Bruce, E.J.; Schultz, C.L. Nonfinite Loss and Grief: A Psychoeducational Approach; Paul H Brookes Publishing: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2001. 30. Abbott, M.; Bernard, P.; Forge, J. Communicating a diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder-a qualitative study of parents’ experiences. Clin. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2013,18, 370–382. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 31. King, G.A.; Zwaigenbaum, L.; King, S.; Baxter, D.; Rosenbaum, P.; Bates, A. A qualitative investigation of changes in the belief systems of families of children with autism or Down syndrome. Child Care Health Dev. 2006,32, 353–369. [CrossRef] 32. Mahmood, H.; Saleemi, M.; Riaz, H.; Hassan, Y.; Khan, F. Coping strategies of mothers with ASD children. Prof. Med. J. 2015,22, 1454–1463. 33. Ferna´ndez-Alc á ntara, M.; Garc í a-Caro, M.P.; P é rez-Marfil, M.N.; Hueso-Montoro, C.; Laynez-Rubio, C.; Cruz-Quintana, F. Feelings of loss and grief in parents of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Res. Dev. Disabil. 2016,55, 312–321. [CrossRef] 34. Lutz, H.R.; Patterson, B.J.; Klein, J. Coping with autism: A journey toward adaptation. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2012,27, 206–213. [CrossRef] 35. Marshall, V.; Long, B.C. Coping processes as revealed in the stories of mothers of children with autism. Qual. Health Res. 2010,20, 105–116. [CrossRef] Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 4821 17 of 18 36. Glaser, B.; Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research; Aldine Publishing: Chicago, IL, USA, 1967. 37. Strauss, A.L.; Corbin, J.; Zimmerman, E. Bases de la Investigaci ó n Cualitativa: T é cnicas y Procedimientos Para Desarrollar la Teoría Fundamentada; Aldine: New York, NY, USA, 2002. 38. Kurtzer-White, E.; Luterman, D. Families and children with hearing loss: Grief and coping. Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 2003,9, 232–235. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 39. Nomen, L. Tratando el Proceso de Duelo y de Morir; Pirámide Psicología: Madrid, Spain, 2008. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 4821 18 of 18 40. Canal, R.; Mart í n, M.V.; Boh ó rquez, D.; Guisuraga, Z.; Herr á ez, L.; Herr á ez, M.; Posada, M. La detecci ó n precoz del autismo y el impacto en la calidad de vida de las familias. In Aplicaci ó n del Paradigma de Calidad de Vida. VII Seminario de Actualizaci ó n Metodol ó gica en Investigaci ó n Sobre Discapacidad; INICO: Salamanca, Spain, 2010; pp. 91–98. 41. Vogel, J.S. A Mythopoetic Exploration of Maternal Grief: When a Child Is Diagnosed on the Autism Spectrum; Pacifica Graduate Institute: Bárbara, CA, USA, 2018. 42. Ozgul, S. Parental grief and serious mental illness: A narrative. Aust. N. Z. J. Fam. 2004 ,25, 183–187. [CrossRef] 43. Gardiner, E.; M â sse, L.C.; Iarocci, G. A psychometric study of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale among families of children with autism spectrum disorder. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2019 ,17, 45. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 44. Walsh, F. Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice. Fam. Process 2003 ,42, 1–18. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 45. Bhana, A.; Bachoo, S. The determinants of family resilience among families in low-and middle-income contexts: A systematic literature review. S. Afr. J. Psychol. 2011,41, 131–139. [CrossRef] 46. Hawley, D.R. Clinical implications of family resilience. Am. J. Fam. Ther. 2000,28, 101–116. [CrossRef] 47. Rutter, M. Resilience concepts and findings: Implications for family therapy. J. Fam. Ther. 1999 ,21, 119–144. [CrossRef] 48. Bilgin, H.; Kucuk, L. Raising an autistic child: Perspectives from Turkish mothers. J. Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Nurs. 2010,23, 92–99. [CrossRef] 49. Seymour, M.; Wood, C.; Giallo, R.; Jellett, R. Fatigue, stress and coping in mothers of children with an autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2013,43, 1547–1554. [CrossRef] 50. Picci, R.L.; Oliva, F.; Trivelli, F.; Carezana, C.; Zuffranieri, M.; Ostacoli, L.; Furlan, P.M.; Lala, R. Emotional burden and coping strategies of parents of children with rare diseases. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2015 ,24, 514–522. [CrossRef] 51. Worden, J.W. Grief Counseling and Grief Therapy: A Handbook for the Mental Health Practitioner; Springer Publishing Company: New York, NY, USA, 2018. © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).