Measurement of the Sensitivity of Two-Particle Correlations in pp Collisions to the Presence of Hard Scatterings

Measurement of the Sensitivity of Two-Particle Correlations in pp Collisions to the Presence of Hard Scatterings G. Aad et al.* (ATLAS Collaboration) (Received 3 April 2023; revised 18 June 2023; accepted 9 August 2023; published 16 October 2023) A key open question in the study of multiparticle production in high-energy pp collisions is the relationship between the “ridge”—i.e., the observed azimuthal correlations between particles in the underlying event that extend over all rapidities—and hard or semihard scattering processes. In particular, it is not known whether jets or their soft fragments are correlated with particles in the underlying event. To address this question, two-particle correlations are measured in pp collisions at ffiffiffi s p¼13 TeV using data collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, with an integrated luminosity of 15.8pb−1, in two different configurations. In the first case, charged particles associated with jets are excluded from the correlation analysis, while in the second case, correlations are measured between particles within jets and charged particles from the underlying event. Second-order flow coefficients, v2, are presented as a function of event multiplicity and transverse momentum. These measurements show that excluding particles associated with jets does not affect the measured correlations. Moreover, particles associated with jets do not exhibit any significant azimuthal correlations with the underlying event, ruling out hard processes contributing to the ridge. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.162301 In heavy-ion collisions, two-particle correlations (2PC) in relative azimuthal angle with large pseudorapidity [1] separation show distinct long-range correlations [2–12]. These long-range correlations are a simple manifestation of the single-particle anisotropies, vn, that originate from the hydrodynamic expansion of the quark-gluon plasma produced in these collisions. The vnare defined by parametrizing the azimuthal distribution of produced particles as dN dϕ∝1þ2X ∞ n¼1 vncos½nðϕ−ΨnÞ;ð1Þ where ϕis the azimuthal angle of the particle momentum and vnand Ψnare the magnitude and phase of the nth-order anisotropy; see Refs. [4,10] and references therein. Because of their hydrodynamic origin in nucleusnucleus (A þA) collisions, such long-range correlations were not expected in smaller colliding systems such as proton-nucleus (pþA) or proton-proton (pp) collisions, where collective phenomena were not commonly expected to develop. However, measurements by CMS showed the presence of such long-range correlations, known as the “ridge,”in high-multiplicity pp collisions [13]. Further investigations by ATLAS [9,14,15] have demonstrated that these long-range correlations in pp collisions are produced from single-particle anisotropies similar to those in heavyion collisions. These long-range correlations have been interpreted as evidence of collective effects similar to those seen in heavy-ion collisions. However, some authors have proposed that the ridge primarily results from correlated production of partons in the presence of dense gluonic initial states (i.e., the “glasma”)[16–20], implying that much of the correlation structure associated with the ridge should be associated with hardor semihard scattering processes. Previous measurements [21] have shown that the ridge is unmodified in pp collisions producing a Zboson, but no direct measurement in pp collisions of the correlation between jets or their fragments and the underlying event has yet been performed, while such a correlation has been observed in pþPb collisions [22,23]. This Letter presents 2PC measurements in pp collisions at a center-of-mass energy ( ffiffiffi s p) of 13 TeV, using the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The measurements are performed with two different particle-pair selections. The first case explores correlations between tracks that are not jet constituents, while the second case measures correlations between tracks that are constituents of jets and tracks that are well-separated from jets. Similar measurements in pþPb collisions have shown significant nonzero v2for low [23] and high [22] transverse momentum (pT) particles generated in hard processes. Correlations are also measured *Full author list given at the end of the Letter. Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 131, 162301 (2023) 0031-9007=23=131(16)=162301(21) 162301-1 © 2023 CERN, for the ATLAS Collaboration in events that are explicitly selected by requiring the presence or absence of low-pTjets. These measurements can address whether or not the presence of jets affects the ridge, and if the particles from jets exhibit azimuthal correlations with particles from the underlying event and therefore contribute to the ridge. The measurements presented here are performed using the ATLAS [24] inner detector (ID), minimum-bias trigger scintillators, calorimeters, and the trigger and data acquisition systems [25]. The ID records charged-particle trajectories within the pseudorapidity range jηj<2.5using a combination of silicon pixel detectors including the “insertable B-layer”[26,27], silicon microstrip detectors, and a straw-tube transition radiation tracker, all immersed in a 2 T axial magnetic field [1,28]. The ATLAS calorimeter system consists of a liquid argon (LAr) electromagnetic calorimeter covering jηj<3.2, a steel-scintillator sampling hadronic calorimeter covering jηj<1.7, a LAr hadronic calorimeter covering 1.5<jηj<3.2, and two LAr electromagnetic and hadronic forward calorimeters covering 3.2<jηj<4.9. The ATLAS trigger system [29] consists of a Level-1 trigger implemented using a combination of dedicated electronics and programmable logic, and a software-based high-level trigger. An extensive software suite [30] is used in data simulation, in the reconstruction and analysis of real and simulated data, in detector operations, and in the trigger and data acquisition systems of the experiment. The data were collected during Run 2 of the LHC (2015– 2018), with an average collision rate per bunch crossing (μ) of less than 3, and an integrated luminosity of 15.8pb−1. The data used here were recorded using multiple minimumbias, high-multiplicity, and jet triggers, which are described in Ref. [31]. Additional offline requirements are imposed on the events selected by the triggers. The events are required to have a reconstructed vertex with jzj<100 mm. To suppress events with more than one pp collision in the same bunch crossing, events are required to have only one reconstructed vertex. Pileup events where the vertices from multiple collisions are sufficiently close such that they are reconstructed as a single vertex are not removed by the one vertex requirement. However, such merged events typically have a broader distribution for the longitudinal impact parameter of tracks relative to the vertex (jz0sinðθÞj). Such events are reduced by requiring that the standard deviation of jz0sinðθÞjfor all tracks in an event is less than 0.25 mm. The reconstruction and performance of tracks and primary vertices in the ID are described in Refs. [32–34]. The specifictrackselectioncriteriacanbefoundinRef. [31].The track reconstruction efficiencies ϵðpT;ηÞare obtained using Monte Carlo (MC) generated events that are passed through a G eant4 [35] simulation [36] of the ATLAS detector and reconstructed using the procedures applied to the data. The efficiency varies between 69% and 87% as a function of η and pT. Jets used in this analysis are reconstructed using the antiktalgorithm [37] with a radius parameter of 0.4. The inputs to jet reconstruction are “particle flow objects”as detailed in Ref. [38]. Jets are calibrated to the hadronic scale using scale factors obtained from MC simulations specifically derived for low-μdata. Additional in situ corrections [39] are applied, which account for differences in the jet response between the MC samples and data. One issue in this analysis is that the modulation in the soft particles in the event [Eq. (1)] biases the jet pTin a manner that depends on its orientation relative to the Ψn. This affects the measurements of the correlations between jet fragments and the underlying event (UE) particles (discussed in detail below). To mitigate this effect, instead of selecting jets based on their pT, selections are made on the following groomed quantity: pG T¼X constituents p>4GeV T ;ð2Þ where the sum runs over all the jet constituents with pT>4GeV, which considerably reduces the number of UE particles within the jet, and makes this bias negligible, as shown in Ref. [31]. In previous ATLAS measurements of 2PCs in pþPb [40,41] and pp [14,15,21] collisions, events were quantified by Nrec ch : the total number of reconstructed tracks with pT>0.4GeV, passing the track selections discussed above. In this analysis, a slight modification is made to ensure that the event activity is not biased by the presence of jets and only reflects the soft multiplicity in the event. The number of constituent tracks in jets with pG T>15 GeV is subtracted from the measured multiplicity, and the corrected quantity, Nrec;corr ch , is used to represent the event activity. While counting the constituent tracks of jets, the pT>4GeV requirement is not imposed on the tracks. Additionally, this correction is offset by the average number of UE tracks within the jet cone. This offset is estimated by measuring the average number of tracks, as a function of ηand ϕ, that are in a R¼0.4cone in events with similar multiplicity and trigger conditions. In 2PC measurements, the distribution of particle pairs in relative azimuthal angle Δϕ¼ϕa−ϕbare measured. The labels aand bdenote the two particles in the pair. In evaluating the correlation functions, the tracks are weighted by the inverse of their reconstruction efficiency, 1=ϵðpT;ηÞ. To suppress short-range correlations, the particles are required to have a pseudorapidity separation of jΔηj>2. In pp collisions, back-to-back dijets also make a significant contribution to the 2PCs. To remove this contribution, a template-fit method [14,15,21] is employed in which the measured 2PC is described by a fit having two components. The first component accounts for the dijet contribution, CperiphðΔϕÞ, which is measured using low-multiplicity events (called the “peripheral reference”). This analysis PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 131, 162301 (2023) 162301-2 uses the Nrec;corr ch interval of 10–30 to build Cperiph. The second component accounts for the bulk contribution with a relative harmonic modulation, CridgeðΔϕÞ. The 2PC can then be described as CðΔϕÞ¼FCperiphðΔϕÞþG1þ2X n¼2 vn;n cosðnΔϕÞ ≡FCperiphðΔϕÞþCridgeðΔϕÞ;ð3Þ where Fand vn;n are fit parameters and Gis fixed by the requirement that the integrals of the fit and CðΔϕÞare equal. The Fourier moments, vn;n, obtained from the template fit quantify the strength of the long-range correlation. It is demonstrated in Refs. [14,15] that the vn;n in pp collisions obtained from Eq. (3) factorize as vn;nðϕa T;ϕb TÞ¼vnðϕa TÞvnðϕb TÞ, where vnis the single particle anisotropy [Eq. (1)]. Thus, vnðϕb TÞis obtained as vnðϕb TÞ¼vn;nðϕa T;ϕb TÞ=ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi vn;nðϕa T;ϕa TÞ p. The tracks used inthis analysis are categorizedas follows: those that are separated from all ϕG T>15 GeV jets by at least one unit in η[22] and having 0.5<p T<4GeV are considered to be UE tracks (hUE); tracks that are included as particle-flow constituents of jets having pG T>40 GeV (called “trigger jets”henceforth) are considered to be jet constituents (hJ). Five classes of correlations are studied in this Letter: (1) standard 2PC [14,15] without applying any rejection of tracks around jets; (2) 2PCwhere both tracks are hUE—about 14% of h-h2PC pairs are removed by the above-mentioned rejection; (3) 2PC using events with no jets with pG T>15 GeV; (4) 2PC using events with at least one jet with pG T>15 GeV; (5) 2PC performed between hUE and hJ. These five classes are referred to as h-h,hUE −hUEðAllEventsÞ,hUE −hUEðNoJetsÞ, hUE −hUEðWithJetsÞ, and hUE −hJ, respectively, in the text below. These classes are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, the hUE −hUEðNoJetsÞand hUE −hUEðWithJetsÞclasses add up to the hUE −hUEðAllEventsÞclass. The hUE −hJ class has no overlapping particle-pairs with the ones in the hUE −hUEðAllEventsÞ,hUE −hUEðNoJetsÞ, and hUE − hUEðWithJetsÞclasses. The h-hclass is identical to the measurements performed in the previous ATLAS publications [14,15], and is used as a reference with which other classes are compared. For the hUE −hJcase, additional requirements are imposed on the trigger jets to avoid distortions of the 2PC. They must have no other jet with pG T>15 GeV within ΔR¼ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Δη2þΔϕ2 p¼1and they must have a balancing jet with pG T>15 GeV and with jΔϕj>5π=6. The first requirement removes distortions of the 2PC at smaller Δϕwhile the second requirement ensures that fragments of the balancing jet are excluded from hUE. It may happen that some constituents of jets originate in the UE, leading to a contribution of combinatorial pairs in the 2PC. These combinatorial pairs, by construction, have the same correlation as those where both the tracks are from the UE. The contribution of such pairs is removed by the following technique. For each event that contributes to the hUE −hJcorrelation, a separate 2PC is made using another event with similar vertex position and multiplicity. In this event, one track is picked from an η-ϕregion that is ) (C >40 GeV G T p: J -h UE h <150 rec,corr ch Nd40 ATLAS -1 =13 TeV, 15.8 pbs pp <4 GeV b,a T p|<5, 0.5<'K2<| >40 GeV G T p: J -h UE h <60 rec,corr ch Nd50 )'I(C )'I( periph FC+G Fit >40 GeV G T p: J -h UE h <100 rec,corr ch Nd90 (0) periph FC)+'I( ridge C (0) periph FC+G 101234 ) 'I(C h-h <150 rec,corr ch Nd40 1 01234 : NoJets UE -h UE h <150 rec,corr ch Nd40 101234 : WithJets UE -h UE h <150 rec,corr ch Nd40 'I 'I 'I 'I 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 0.98 1 1.02 1.04 FIG. 1. Template fits to the two-particle correlations in Δϕ. Events with 10 ≤Nrec;corr ch <30 are used as the peripheral reference. The solid points indicate the measured 2PC, the open circles show the scaled and shifted peripheral reference, and the continuous line shows the fit. The dashed line shows the second-order harmonic component, and the dotted line shows the pedestal of the fit shifted up by FCperiphð0Þ. The top row corresponds to different multiplicity intervals for the hUE −hJclass. The left, center, and right panels in the bottom row correspond to the h-h,hUE −hUEðNoJetsÞ, and hUE −hUEðWithJetsÞclasses, respectively, for the 40–150 multiplicity interval. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 131, 162301 (2023) 162301-3 within R¼0.4cone of the jet axis and the other track is picked from the same ηrange as in the hUE −hJevent. This combinatorial 2PC is then subtracted from the hUE −hJ2PC. Statistical uncertainties in the measured 2PCs are evaluated using a bootstrapping procedure previously used in Ref. [42]. Systematic uncertainties in the v2measurements are estimated by varying different aspects of the analysis. For the template-fit procedure, the Nrec;corr ch multiplicity range for the peripheral reference selection was varied from the nominal 10–30 to 10–40 and 20–40 [31] and the change in the v2values is included as a systematic uncertainty. For the multiplicity dependence, this uncertainty for the v2is 0.01 (absolute) for the hUE −hJclass and is typically within 2% for the other classes. This uncertainty is fully correlated across all multiplicity intervals and is the dominant uncertainty for the hUE −hJclass. Uncertainties in the tracking efficiency are propagated into the measured v2. This uncertainty on the v2is less than 0.5%, and is estimated by varying the efficiency up and down within its uncertainties (∼3%)[43], and re-evaluating the v2. The systematic uncertainty due to nonprimary tracks is estimated by varying the selection criteria for transverse and longitudinal impact parameters, resulting in a 0.5% change in v2. The 2PC analyses often use event mixing [4,10] to estimate and correct the 2PCs for the detector’s pair acceptance. This correction is quite small, and the full effect of the correction is included as a systematic uncertainty. As discussed previously, the events used in this analysis are required to have the standard deviation of jz0sinðθÞj for the tracks in an event to be smaller than 0.25 mm, to reduce pileup. Conservatively, the entire effect of this selection, which varies with multiplicity but is typically within 1%, is taken to be a systematic uncertainty associated with pileup effects. Figure 1compares the 2PCs for all classes, except the hUE −hUEðAllEventsÞclass. The figure also shows the templatefitsincluding the components of the fits.In general, the template fits describe the 2PCs quite well. A near-side ridge is visible for the h-h,hUE −hUEðWithJetsÞ, and hUE −hUEðNoJetsÞcases, while the CperiphðΔϕÞappears to describe the full distribution in the hUE −hJcase. Figure 2shows the multiplicity dependence of the v2for all five 2PC classes. The v2values for the h-hcase vary weakly with multiplicity, as previously reported in Refs. [14,15]. The v2values in the hUE −hUEðAllEventsÞ, hUE −hUEðNoJetsÞ, and hUE −hUEðWithJetsÞcases, are all consistent with the h-hresult. This demonstrates that removing tracks associated with jets does not impact the long-range UE correlations, and nor does the presence (or absence) of jets in an event. Within uncertainties, the v2values in the hUE −hJcase are consistent with zero. The mean v2for the hUE −hJcorrelations over the 40–150 multiplicity range is −0.009 0.010ðstatisticalÞ 0.014ðsystematicÞ. This indicates that particles produced in hard scattering processes (with pG T>40 GeV) do not contribute significantly to the long-range correlation observed in pp collisions. Figure 3shows the pTdependence of the v2. The differential v2ðpTÞvalues in the hUE −hUEðAllEventsÞ,hUE −hUEðNoJetsÞ, and hUE − hUEðWithJetsÞcases are found to be consistent with the 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 rec,corr ch N 2 v ATLAS -1 =13 TeV, 15.8 pbs pp <4 GeV b,a T p0.5< h-h UE -h UE h J -h UE h : : : WithJetsNoJetsAllEvents >40 GeV G T p 0 0.1 0.2 FIG. 2. The multiplicity dependence of v2for 2<jΔηj<5. Events with 10 ≤Nrec;corr ch <30 are used as the peripheral reference. Jets with pG T>15 GeV are used to classify the hUE − hUEðNoJetsÞand hUE −hUEðWithJetsÞsamples. The data point for the hUE −hUEðWithJetsÞcase has a particularly large statistical uncertainty in the 40–50 multiplicity interval and is not shown. The data points for the hUE −hUEðAllEventsÞ, hUE −hUEðNoJetsÞ, and hUE −hUEðWithJetsÞsamples are slightly shifted along the xaxis for clarity. The error bars and bands correspond to statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. 012345678 [GeV] b T p 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 2 v ATLAS -1 =13 TeV, 15.8 pbs pp <150 rec,corr ch Nd40 <4 GeV a T p0.5< h-h UE -h UE h J -h UE h : : : WithJetsNoJetsAllEvents >40 GeV G T p FIG. 3. The pb Tdependence of the v2obtained for the 40–150 multiplicity interval for 2<jΔηj<5. Events with 10 ≤ Nrec;corr ch <30 are used as the peripheral reference. Jets with pG T> 15 GeV are used to classify the hUE −hUEðNoJetsÞand hUE − hUEðWithJetsÞsamples. The data points for the h-hsample are drawn at the nominal values while the data points for the hUE −hUEðAllEventsÞ,hUE −hUEðNoJetsÞ, and the highest pb Tpoint of hUE −hJsamples are shifted slightly for clarity. The error bars and bands correspond to statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 131, 162301 (2023) 162301-4 h-hcase. Again, within uncertainties, the hUE −hJv2values areconsistent with zero, across the entire measured pTrange. The findings drawn from the pTdependence are consistent with those from the multiplicity dependence, and similarly demonstrate that the presence or absence of jets has no influence on the flow of the UE and that there are no correlations between jet fragments and the UE. The features of the v2values discussed above do not show any systematic variation with the jet selections—for example, the pG Tthresholds used in the analysis, as discussed in Ref. [31]. In conclusion, this Letter studies long-range 2PCs in pp collisions when rejecting tracks in the vicinity of jets, and the correlations between jet constituent tracks and tracks from the UE. The 2PCs are analyzed using a template-fit procedure, previously developed by ATLAS [15], which extracts second-order Fourier coefficients (v2) of the anisotropy. These results demonstrate that the magnitude of the v2is not affected when removing tracks associated with jets, or by the presence or absence of jets in the event. The v2measured with correlations between jet constituents with pT<8GeV and UE tracks are consistent with zero within uncertainties. These features are observed both in the v2multiplicity and pTdependence. The observation that fragments of high-pTjets in pp collisions do not have measurable long-range azimuthal correlations with the UE and that the production of Z bosons [21] or jets does not significantly influence the long-range correlations between UE particles, suggest a complete “factorization”between hard-scattering processes and the physics responsible for the ridge. Further studies are needed to extend this measurement to higher pTto compare with previous measurements in pþPb collisions [22] where such factorization is broken. This Letter provides important insights into the origin of the longrange correlations observed in pp collisions and offers new fundamental input to theoretical models. We thank CERN for the very successful operation of the LHC, as well as the support staff from our institutions without whom ATLAS could not be operated efficiently. We acknowledge the support of ANPCyT, Argentina; YerPhI, Armenia; ARC, Australia; BMWFW and FWF, Austria; ANAS, Azerbaijan; CNPq and FAPESP, Brazil; NSERC, NRC, and CFI, Canada; CERN; ANID, Chile; CAS, MOST, and NSFC, China; Minciencias, Colombia; MEYS CR, Czech Republic; DNRF and DNSRC, Denmark; IN2P3-CNRS and CEA-DRF/IRFU, France; SRNSFG, Georgia; BMBF, HGF, and MPG, Germany; GSRI, Greece; RGC and Hong Kong SAR, China; ISF and Benoziyo Center, Israel; INFN, Italy; MEXT and JSPS, Japan; CNRST, Morocco; NWO, Netherlands; RCN, Norway; MEiN, Poland; FCT, Portugal; MNE/IFA, Romania; MESTD, Serbia; MSSR, Slovakia; ARRS and MIZŠ, Slovenia; DSI/NRF, South Africa; MICINN, Spain; SRC and Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden; SERI, SNSF, and Cantons of Bern and Geneva, Switzerland; MOST, Taiwan;TENMAK,Türkiye;STFC,UnitedKingdom;DOE and NSF, United States of America. In addition, individual groups and members have received support from BCKDF, CANARIE, Compute Canada, and CRC, Canada; PRIMUS 21/SCI/017 and UNCE SCI/013, Czech Republic; COST, ERC, ERDF, Horizon 2020, and Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions, European Union; Investissements d’Avenir Labex, Investissements d’Avenir Idex, and ANR, France; DFG and AvH Foundation, Germany; Herakleitos, Thales, and Aristeia programmes cofinanced by EU-ESF and the Greek NSRF, Greece; BSF-NSF and MINERVA, Israel; Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2014-2021, Norway; NCN and NAWA, Poland; La Caixa Banking Foundation, CERCA Programme Generalitat de Catalunya, and PROMETEO and GenT Programmes Generalitat Valenciana, Spain; Göran Gustafssons Stiftelse, Sweden; The Royal Society and Leverhulme Trust, United Kingdom. The crucial computing support from all WLCG partners is acknowledged gratefully, in particular from CERN, the ATLAS Tier-1 facilities at TRIUMF (Canada), NDGF (Denmark, Norway, Sweden), CC-IN2P3 (France), KIT/ GridKA (Germany), INFN-CNAF (Italy), NL-T1 (Netherlands), PIC (Spain), ASGC (Taiwan), RAL (UK) and BNL (USA), the Tier-2 facilities worldwide, and large non-WLCG resource providers. Major contributors of computing resources are listed in Ref. [44]. [1] ATLAS uses a right-handed coordinate system with its origin at the nominal interaction point (IP) in the center of the detector and the zaxis along the beam pipe. The xaxis points from the IP to the center of the LHC ring, and the yaxis points upward. Cylindrical coordinates ðr; ϕÞare used in the transverse plane, ϕbeing the azimuthal angle around the zaxis. The pseudorapidity is defined in terms of the polar angle θas η¼−ln tanðθ=2Þ. Angular distance is measured in units of ΔR≡ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ðΔηÞ2þðΔϕÞ2 p. [2] ALICE Collaboration, Centrality dependence of dihadron correlations and azimuthal anisotropy harmonics in PbPb collisions at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sNN p¼2.76 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 708, 249 (2012). [3] CMS Collaboration, Centrality dependence of dihadron correlations and azimuthal anisotropy harmonics in PbPb collisions at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sNN p¼2.76 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2012 (2012). [4] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy for charged particle production in ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sNN p¼ 2.76 TeV lead–lead collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C 86, 014907 (2012). [5] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of event-plane correlations in ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sNN p¼2.76 TeV lead–lead collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C 90, 024905 (2014). [6] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of flow harmonics with multi-particle cumulants in Pb þPb collisions at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sNN p¼2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3157 (2014). PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 131, 162301 (2023) 162301-5 [7] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the centrality and pseudorapidity dependence of the integrated elliptic flow in lead–lead collisions at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sNN p¼2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2982 (2014). [8] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the distributions of event-by-event flow harmonics in lead–lead collisions at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sNN p¼2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 183. [9] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of multi-particle azimuthal correlations in pp,pþPb and low-multiplicity Pb þPb collisions with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 428 (2017). [10] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy of charged particles produced in ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sNN p¼ 5.02 TeV Pb þPb collisions with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 997 (2018). [11] STAR Collaboration, Elliptic flow from twoand fourparticle correlations in Au þAu collisions at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sNN p¼130 GeV, Phys. Rev. C 66, 034904 (2002). [12] PHENIX Collaboration, Measurement of the higherorder anisotropic flow coefficients for identified hadrons in Au þAu collisions at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sNN p¼200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C 93, 051902 (2016). [13] CMS Collaboration, Observation of long-range, near-side angular correlations in proton–proton collisions at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2010) 091. [14] ATLAS Collaboration, Observation of Long-Range Elliptic Azimuthal Anisotropies in ffiffiffi s p¼13 and 2.76 TeV pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 172301 (2016). [15] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurements of long-range azimuthal anisotropies and associated Fourier coefficients for pp collisions at ffiffiffi s p¼5.02 and 13 TeVand pþPb collisions at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sNN p¼5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C 96, 024908 (2017). [16] A. Dumitru, K. Dusling, F. Gelis, J. Jalilian-Marian, T. Lappi, and R. Venugopalan, The Ridge in protonproton collisions at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 697,21 (2011). [17] K. Dusling and R. Venugopalan, Azimuthal Collimation of Long Range Rapidity Correlations by Strong Color Fields in High Multiplicity Hadron-Hadron Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 262001 (2012). [18] E. Gotsman, E. Levin, and I. Potashnikova, A CGC/ saturation approach for angular correlations in proton– proton scattering, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 632 (2017). [19] K. Dusling, M. Mace, and R. Venugopalan, Parton model description of multiparticle azimuthal correlations in pA collisions, Phys. Rev. D 97, 016014 (2018). [20] T. Altinoluk and N. Armesto, Particle correlations from the initial state, Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 215 (2020). [21] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of long-range twoparticle azimuthal correlations in Z-boson tagged pp collisions at ffiffiffi s p¼8and 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 80,64 (2020). [22] ATLAS Collaboration, Transverse momentum and process dependent azimuthal anisotropies in ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sNN p¼8.16 TeV pþPb collisions with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 73 (2020). [23] ALICE Collaboration, Azimuthal anisotropy of jet particles in p-Pb and Pb-Pb collisions at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sNN p¼5.02 TeV, arXiv:2212.12609. [24] ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, J. Instrum. 3, S08003 (2008). [25] ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 317 (2017). [26] ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS insertable B-layer Technical Design Report, Report No. ATLAS-TDR-19; CERN-LHCC-2010-013, 2010, https://cds.cern.ch/record/ 1291633; Addendum: Report No. ATLAS-TDR-19ADD-1; CERN-LHCC-2012-009, 2012, https://cds.cern .ch/record/1451888. [27] B. Abbott et al., Production and integration of the ATLAS insertable B-layer, J. Instrum. 13, T05008 (2018). [28] ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS inner detector commissioning and calibration, Eur. Phys. J. C 70, 787 (2010). [29] ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS Trigger System in 2010, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1849 (2012). [30] ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Collaboration Software and Firmware, Report No. ATL-SOFT-PUB-2021-001, CERN, 2021. [31] See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/ supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.162301 for details of the triggers, track selection criteria, systematic uncertainties related to the peripheral reference, an explanation of how the groomed pG Tremoves the underlying-event bias and, cross-checks related to the jet selections. [32] T. Cornelissen, M. Elsing, I. Gavrilenko, W. Liebig, E. Moyse, and A. Salzburger, The new ATLAS track reconstruction (NEWT), J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 119, 032014 (2008). [33] A. Salzburger (ATLAS Collaboration), Optimisation of the ATLAS track reconstruction software for Run-2, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 664, 072042 (2015). [34] ATLAS Collaboration, The optimization of ATLAS track reconstruction in dense environments, Report No. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-006, CERN, 2015. [35] S. Agostinelli et al., G eant4: A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003). [36] ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C 70, 823 (2010). [37] M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2008) 063. [38] ATLAS Collaboration, Jet reconstruction and performance using particle flow with the ATLAS Detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 466 (2017). [39] ATLAS Collaboration, Jet energy scale and resolution measured in proton–proton collisions at ffiffiffi s p¼13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 689 (2020). [40] ATLAS Collaboration, Observation of Associated NearSide and Away-Side Long-Range Correlations in ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sNN p¼ 5.02 TeV Proton–Lead Collisions with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 182302 (2013). [41] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of long-range pseudorapidity correlations and azimuthal harmonics in ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sNN p¼ 5.02 TeV proton–lead collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C 90, 044906 (2014). PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 131, 162301 (2023) 162301-6 [42] ATLAS Collaboration, Two-particle azimuthal correlations in photonuclear ultraperipheral Pb þPb collisions at 5.02 TeV with ATLAS, Phys. Rev. C 104, 014903 (2021). [43] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy of charged-particle production in Xe þXe collisions at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sNN p¼5.44 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. C 101, 024906 (2020). [44] ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS computing acknowledgements, Report No. ATL-SOFT-PUB-2021-003, CERN, 2021. G. Aad ,102 B. Abbott ,120 K. Abeling ,55 N. J. Abicht ,49 S. H. Abidi ,29 A. Aboulhorma ,35e H. Abramowicz ,151 H. Abreu ,150 Y. Abulaiti ,117 A. C. Abusleme Hoffman ,137a B. S. Acharya ,69a,69b,b C. Adam Bourdarios ,4 L. Adamczyk ,85a L. Adamek ,155 S. V. Addepalli ,26 M. J. Addison ,101 J. Adelman ,115 A. Adiguzel ,21c T. Adye ,134 A. A. Affolder ,136 Y. Afik ,36 M. N. Agaras ,13 J. Agarwala ,73a,73b A. Aggarwal ,100 C. Agheorghiesei ,27c A. Ahmad ,36 F. Ahmadov ,38,c W. S. Ahmed ,104 S. Ahuja ,95 X. Ai ,62a G. Aielli ,76a,76b M. Ait Tamlihat ,35e B. Aitbenchikh ,35a I. Aizenberg ,169 M. Akbiyik ,100 T. P. A. Åkesson ,98 A. V. Akimov ,37 D. Akiyama ,168 N. N. Akolkar ,24 K. Al Khoury ,41 G. L. Alberghi ,23b J. Albert ,165 P. Albicocco ,53 G. L. Albouy ,60 S. Alderweireldt ,52 M. Aleksa ,36 I. N. Aleksandrov ,38 C. Alexa ,27b T. Alexopoulos ,10 A. Alfonsi ,114 F. Alfonsi ,23b M. Algren ,56 M. Alhroob ,120 B. Ali ,132 H. M. J. Ali ,91 S. Ali ,148 S. W. Alibocus ,92 M. Aliev ,37 G. Alimonti ,71a W. Alkakhi ,55 C. Allaire ,66 B. M. M. Allbrooke ,146 J. F. Allen ,52 C. A. Allendes Flores ,137f P. P. Allport ,20 A. Aloisio ,72a,72b F. Alonso ,90 C. Alpigiani ,138 M. Alvarez Estevez ,99 A. Alvarez Fernandez ,100 M. G. Alviggi ,72a,72b M. Aly ,101 Y. Amaral Coutinho ,82b A. Ambler ,104 C. Amelung,36 M. Amerl ,101 C. G. Ames ,109 D. Amidei ,106 S. P. Amor Dos Santos ,130a K. R. Amos ,163 V. Ananiev ,125 C. Anastopoulos ,139 T. Andeen ,11 J. K. Anders ,36 S. Y. Andrean ,47a,47b A. Andreazza ,71a,71b S. Angelidakis ,9A. Angerami ,41,d A. V. Anisenkov ,37 A. Annovi ,74a C. Antel ,56 M. T. Anthony ,139 E. Antipov ,145 M. Antonelli ,53 D. J. A. Antrim ,17a F. Anulli ,75a M. Aoki ,83 T. Aoki ,153 J. A. Aparisi Pozo ,163 M. A. Aparo ,146 L. Aperio Bella ,48 C. Appelt ,18 A. Apyan ,26 N. Aranzabal ,36 C. Arcangeletti ,53 A. T. H. Arce ,51 E. Arena ,92 J-F. Arguin ,108 S. Argyropoulos ,54 J.-H. Arling ,48 A. J. Armbruster ,36 O. Arnaez ,4H. Arnold ,114 Z. P. Arrubarrena Tame,109 G. Artoni ,75a,75b H. Asada ,111 K. Asai ,118 S. Asai ,153 N. A. Asbah ,61 J. Assahsah ,35d K. Assamagan ,29 R. Astalos ,28a S. Atashi ,160 R. J. Atkin ,33a M. Atkinson,162 N. B. Atlay ,18 H. Atmani,62b P. A. Atmasiddha ,106 K. Augsten ,132 S. Auricchio ,72a,72b A. D. Auriol ,20 V. A. Austrup ,101 G. Avolio ,36 K. Axiotis ,56 G. Azuelos ,108,e D. Babal ,28b H. Bachacou ,135 K. Bachas ,152,f A. Bachiu ,34 F. Backman ,47a,47b A. Badea ,61 P. Bagnaia ,75a,75b M. Bahmani ,18 A. J. Bailey ,163 V. R. Bailey ,162 J. T. Baines ,134 L. Baines ,94 C. Bakalis ,10 O. K. Baker ,172 E. Bakos ,15 D. Bakshi Gupta ,8R. Balasubramanian ,114 E. M. Baldin ,37 P. Balek ,85a E. Ballabene ,23b,23a F. Balli ,135 L. M. Baltes ,63a W. K. Balunas ,32 J. Balz ,100 E. Banas ,86 M. Bandieramonte ,129 A. Bandyopadhyay ,24 S. Bansal ,24 L. Barak ,151 M. Barakat ,48 E. L. Barberio ,105 D. Barberis ,57b,57a M. Barbero ,102 G. Barbour,96 K. N. Barends ,33a T. Barillari ,110 M-S. Barisits ,36 T. Barklow ,143 P. Baron ,122 D. A. Baron Moreno ,101 A. Baroncelli ,62a G. Barone ,29 A. J. Barr ,126 J. D. Barr ,96 L. Barranco Navarro ,47a,47b F. Barreiro ,99 J. Barreiro Guimarães da Costa ,14a U. Barron ,151 M. G. Barros Teixeira ,130a S. Barsov ,37 F. Bartels ,63a R. Bartoldus ,143 A. E. Barton ,91 P. Bartos ,28a A. Basan ,100 M. Baselga ,49 A. Bassalat ,66,g M. J. Basso ,156a C. R. Basson ,101 R. L. Bates ,59 S. Batlamous,35e J. R. Batley ,32 B. Batool ,141 M. Battaglia ,136 D. Battulga ,18 M. Bauce ,75a,75b M. Bauer ,36 P. Bauer ,24 L. T. Bazzano Hurrell ,30 J. B. Beacham ,51 T. Beau ,127 P. H. Beauchemin ,158 F. Becherer ,54 P. Bechtle ,24 H. P. Beck ,19,h K. Becker ,167 A. J. Beddall ,21d V. A. Bednyakov ,38 C. P. Bee ,145 L. J. Beemster,15 T. A. Beermann ,36 M. Begalli ,82d M. Begel ,29 A. Behera ,145 J. K. Behr ,48 J. F. Beirer ,55 F. Beisiegel ,24 M. Belfkir ,159 G. Bella ,151 L. Bellagamba ,23b A. Bellerive ,34 P. Bellos ,20 K. Beloborodov ,37 N. L. Belyaev ,37 D. Benchekroun ,35a F. Bendebba ,35a Y. Benhammou ,151 M. Benoit ,29 J. R. Bensinger ,26 S. Bentvelsen ,114 L. Beresford ,48 M. Beretta ,53 E. Bergeaas Kuutmann ,161 N. Berger ,4B. Bergmann ,132 J. Beringer ,17a G. Bernardi ,5C. Bernius ,143 F. U. Bernlochner ,24 F. Bernon ,36,102 T. Berry ,95 P. Berta ,133 A. Berthold ,50 I. A. Bertram ,91 S. Bethke ,110 A. Betti ,75a,75b A. J. Bevan ,94 M. Bhamjee ,33c S. Bhatta ,145 D. S. Bhattacharya ,166 P. Bhattarai ,26 V. S. Bhopatkar ,121 R. Bi,29,i R. M. Bianchi ,129 G. Bianco ,23b,23a O. Biebel ,109 R. Bielski ,123 M. Biglietti ,77a T. R. V. Billoud ,132 M. Bindi ,55 A. Bingul ,21b C. Bini ,75a,75b A. Biondini ,92 C. J. Birch-sykes ,101 G. A. Bird ,20,134 M. Birman ,169 M. Biros ,133 T. Bisanz ,49 PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 131, 162301 (2023) 162301-7 E. Bisceglie ,43b,43a D. Biswas ,141 A. Bitadze ,101 K. Bjørke ,125 I. Bloch ,48 C. Blocker ,26 A. Blue ,59 U. Blumenschein ,94 J. Blumenthal ,100 G. J. Bobbink ,114 V. S. Bobrovnikov ,37 M. Boehler ,54 B. Boehm ,166 D. Bogavac ,36 A. G. Bogdanchikov ,37 C. Bohm ,47a V. Boisvert ,95 P. Bokan ,48 T. Bold ,85a M. Bomben ,5 M. Bona ,94 M. Boonekamp ,135 C. D. Booth ,95 A. G. Borb´ely ,59 I. S. Bordulev ,37 H. M. Borecka-Bielska ,108 L. S. Borgna ,96 G. Borissov ,91 D. Bortoletto ,126 D. Boscherini ,23b M. Bosman ,13 J. D. Bossio Sola ,36 K. Bouaouda ,35a N. Bouchhar ,163 J. Boudreau ,129 E. V. Bouhova-Thacker ,91 D. Boumediene ,40 R. Bouquet ,5 A. Boveia ,119 J. Boyd ,36 D. Boye ,29 I. R. Boyko ,38 J. Bracinik ,20 N. Brahimi ,62d G. Brandt ,171 O. Brandt ,32 F. Braren ,48 B. Brau ,103 J. E. Brau ,123 R. Brener ,169 L. Brenner ,114 R. Brenner ,161 S. Bressler ,169 D. Britton ,59 D. Britzger ,110 I. Brock ,24 G. Brooijmans ,41 W. K. Brooks ,137f E. Brost ,29 L. M. Brown ,165,j L. E. Bruce ,61 T. L. Bruckler ,126 P. A. Bruckman de Renstrom ,86 B. Brüers ,48 D. Bruncko ,28b,a A. Bruni ,23b G. Bruni ,23b M. Bruschi ,23b N. Bruscino ,75a,75b T. Buanes ,16 Q. Buat ,138 D. Buchin ,110 A. G. Buckley ,59 M. K. Bugge ,125 O. Bulekov ,37 B. A. Bullard ,143 S. Burdin ,92 C. D. Burgard ,49 A. M. Burger ,40 B. Burghgrave ,8 O. Burlayenko ,54 J. T. P. Burr ,32 C. D. Burton ,11 J. C. Burzynski ,142 E. L. Busch ,41 V. Büscher ,100 P. J. Bussey ,59 J. M. Butler ,25 C. M. Buttar ,59 J. M. Butterworth ,96 W. Buttinger ,134 C. J. Buxo Vazquez,107 A. R. Buzykaev ,37 G. Cabras ,23b S. Cabrera Urbán ,163 L. Cadamuro ,66 D. Caforio ,58 H. Cai ,129 Y. Cai ,14a,14e V. M. M. Cairo ,36 O. Cakir ,3a N. Calace ,36 P. Calafiura ,17a G. Calderini ,127 P. Calfayan ,68 G. Callea ,59 L. P. Caloba,82b D. Calvet ,40 S. Calvet ,40 T. P. Calvet ,102 M. Calvetti ,74a,74b R. Camacho Toro ,127 S. Camarda ,36 D. Camarero Munoz ,26 P. Camarri ,76a,76b M. T. Camerlingo ,72a,72b D. Cameron ,125 C. Camincher ,165 M. Campanelli ,96 A. Camplani ,42 V. Canale ,72a,72b A. Canesse ,104 M. Cano Bret ,80 J. Cantero ,163 Y. Cao ,162 F. Capocasa ,26 M. Capua ,43b,43a A. Carbone ,71a,71b R. Cardarelli ,76a J. C. J. Cardenas ,8F. Cardillo ,163 T. Carli ,36 G. Carlino ,72a J. I. Carlotto ,13 B. T. Carlson ,129,k E. M. Carlson ,165,156a L. Carminati ,71a,71b A. Carnelli ,135 M. Carnesale ,75a,75b S. Caron ,113 E. Carquin ,137f S. Carrá ,71a,71b G. Carratta ,23b,23a F. Carrio Argos ,33g J. W. S. Carter ,155 T. M. Carter ,52 M. P. Casado ,13,l M. Caspar ,48 E. G. Castiglia ,172 F. L. Castillo ,4L. Castillo Garcia ,13 V. Castillo Gimenez ,163 N. F. Castro ,130a,130e A. Catinaccio ,36 J. R. Catmore ,125 V. Cavaliere ,29 N. Cavalli ,23b,23a V. Cavasinni ,74a,74b Y. C. Cekmecelioglu ,48 E. Celebi ,21a F. Celli ,126 M. S. Centonze ,70a,70b K. Cerny ,122 A. S. Cerqueira ,82a A. Cerri ,146 L. Cerrito ,76a,76b F. Cerutti ,17a B. Cervato ,141 A. Cervelli ,23b G. Cesarini ,53 S. A. Cetin ,21d Z. Chadi ,35a D. Chakraborty ,115 M. Chala ,130f J. Chan ,170 W. Y. Chan ,153 J. D. Chapman ,32 E. Chapon ,135 B. Chargeishvili ,149b D. G. Charlton ,20 T. P. Charman ,94 M. Chatterjee ,19 C. Chauhan ,133 S. Chekanov ,6 S. V. Chekulaev ,156a G. A. Chelkov ,38,m A. Chen ,106 B. Chen ,151 B. Chen ,165 H. Chen ,14c H. Chen ,29 J. Chen ,62c J. Chen ,142 M. Chen ,126 S. Chen ,153 S. J. Chen ,14c X. Chen ,62c X. Chen ,14b,n Y. Chen ,62a C. L. Cheng ,170 H. C. Cheng ,64a S. Cheong ,143 A. Cheplakov ,38 E. Cheremushkina ,48 E. Cherepanova ,114 R. Cherkaoui El Moursli ,35e E. Cheu ,7K. Cheung ,65 L. Chevalier ,135 V. Chiarella ,53 G. Chiarelli ,74a N. Chiedde ,102 G. Chiodini ,70a A. S. Chisholm ,20 A. Chitan ,27b M. Chitishvili ,163 M. V. Chizhov ,38 K. Choi ,11 A. R. Chomont ,75a,75b Y. Chou ,103 E. Y. S. Chow ,114 T. Chowdhury ,33g K. L. Chu,169 M. C. Chu ,64a X. Chu ,14a,14e J. Chudoba ,131 J. J. Chwastowski ,86 D. Cieri ,110 K. M. Ciesla ,85a V. Cindro ,93 A. Ciocio ,17a F. Cirotto ,72a,72b Z. H. Citron ,169,o M. Citterio ,71a D. A. Ciubotaru,27b B. M. Ciungu ,155 A. Clark ,56 P. J. Clark ,52 J. M. Clavijo Columbie ,48 S. E. Clawson ,48 C. Clement ,47a,47b J. Clercx ,48 L. Clissa ,23b,23a Y. Coadou ,102 M. Cobal ,69a,69c A. Coccaro ,57b R. F. Coelho Barrue ,130a R. Coelho Lopes De Sa ,103 S. Coelli ,71a H. Cohen ,151 A. E. C. Coimbra ,71a,71b B. Cole ,41 J. Collot ,60 P. Conde Muiño ,130a,130g M. P. Connell ,33c S. H. Connell ,33c I. A. Connelly ,59 E. I. Conroy ,126 F. Conventi ,72a,p H. G. Cooke ,20 A. M. Cooper-Sarkar ,126 A. Cordeiro Oudot Choi ,127 F. Cormier ,164 L. D. Corpe ,40 M. Corradi ,75a,75b F. Corriveau ,104,q A. Cortes-Gonzalez ,18 M. J. Costa ,163 F. Costanza ,4D. Costanzo ,139 B. M. Cote ,119 G. Cowan ,95 K. Cranmer ,170 D. Cremonini ,23b,23a S. Cr´ep´e-Renaudin ,60 F. Crescioli ,127 M. Cristinziani ,141 M. Cristoforetti ,78a,78b V. Croft ,114 J. E. Crosby ,121 G. Crosetti ,43b,43a A. Cueto ,99 T. Cuhadar Donszelmann ,160 H. Cui ,14a,14e Z. Cui ,7 W. R. Cunningham ,59 F. Curcio ,43b,43a P. Czodrowski ,36 M. M. Czurylo ,63b M. J. Da Cunha Sargedas De Sousa ,62a J. V. Da Fonseca Pinto ,82b C. Da Via ,101 W. Dabrowski ,85a T. Dado ,49 S. Dahbi ,33g T. Dai ,106 C. Dallapiccola ,103 M. Dam ,42 G. D’amen ,29 V. D’Amico ,109 J. Damp ,100 J. R. Dandoy ,128 M. F. Daneri ,30 M. Danninger ,142 V. Dao ,36 G. Darbo ,57b S. Darmora ,6S. J. Das ,29,i S. D’Auria ,71a,71b C. David ,156b T. Davidek ,133 B. Davis-Purcell ,34 I. Dawson ,94 H. A. Day-hall ,132 K. De ,8R. De Asmundis ,72a N. De Biase ,48 PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 131, 162301 (2023) 162301-8 S. De Castro ,23b,23a N. De Groot ,113 P. de Jong ,114 H. De la Torre ,107 A. De Maria ,14c A. De Salvo ,75a U. De Sanctis ,76a,76b A. De Santo ,146 J. B. De Vivie De Regie ,60 D. V. Dedovich,38 J. Degens ,114 A. M. Deiana ,44 F. Del Corso ,23b,23a J. Del Peso ,99 F. Del Rio ,63a F. Deliot ,135 C. M. Delitzsch ,49 M. Della Pietra ,72a,72b D. Della Volpe ,56 A. Dell’Acqua ,36 L. Dell’Asta ,71a,71b M. Delmastro ,4P. A. Delsart ,60 S. Demers ,172 M. Demichev ,38 S. P. Denisov ,37 L. D’Eramo ,40 D. Derendarz ,86 F. Derue ,127 P. Dervan ,92 K. Desch ,24 C. Deutsch ,24 F. A. Di Bello ,57b,57a A. Di Ciaccio ,76a,76b L. Di Ciaccio ,4A. Di Domenico ,75a,75b C. Di Donato ,72a,72b A. Di Girolamo ,36 G. Di Gregorio ,5A. Di Luca ,78a,78b B. Di Micco ,77a,77b R. Di Nardo ,77a,77b C. Diaconu ,102 F. A. Dias ,114 T. Dias Do Vale ,142 M. A. Diaz ,137a,137b F. G. Diaz Capriles ,24 M. Didenko ,163 E. B. Diehl ,106 L. Diehl ,54 S. Díez Cornell ,48 C. Diez Pardos ,141 C. Dimitriadi ,24,161 A. Dimitrievska ,17a J. Dingfelder ,24 I-M. Dinu ,27b S. J. Dittmeier ,63b F. Dittus ,36 F. Djama ,102 T. Djobava ,149b J. I. Djuvsland ,16 C. Doglioni ,101,98 J. Dolejsi ,133 Z. Dolezal ,133 M. Donadelli ,82c B. Dong ,107 J. Donini ,40 A. D’Onofrio ,77a,77b M. D’Onofrio ,92 J. Dopke ,134 A. Doria ,72a N. Dos Santos Fernandes ,130a M. T. Dova ,90 A. T. Doyle ,59 M. A. Draguet ,126 E. Dreyer ,169 I. Drivas-koulouris ,10 A. S. Drobac ,158 M. Drozdova ,56 D. Du ,62a T. A. du Pree ,114 F. Dubinin ,37 M. Dubovsky ,28a E. Duchovni ,169 G. Duckeck ,109 O. A. Ducu ,27b D. Duda ,52 A. Dudarev ,36 E. R. Duden ,26 M. D’uffizi ,101 L. Duflot ,66 M. Dührssen ,36 C. Dülsen ,171 A. E. Dumitriu ,27b M. Dunford ,63a S. Dungs ,49 K. Dunne ,47a,47b A. Duperrin ,102 H. Duran Yildiz ,3a M. Düren ,58 A. Durglishvili ,149b B. L. Dwyer ,115 G. I. Dyckes ,17a M. Dyndal ,85a S. Dysch ,101 B. S. Dziedzic ,86 Z. O. Earnshaw ,146 G. H. Eberwein ,126 B. Eckerova ,28a S. Eggebrecht ,55 M. G. Eggleston,51 E. Egidio Purcino De Souza,127 L. F. Ehrke ,56 G. Eigen ,16 K. Einsweiler ,17a T. Ekelof ,161 P. A. Ekman ,98 S. El Farkh ,35b Y. El Ghazali ,35b H. El Jarrari ,35e,148 A. El Moussaouy ,35a V. Ellajosyula ,161 M. Ellert ,161 F. Ellinghaus ,171 A. A. Elliot ,94 N. Ellis ,36 J. Elmsheuser ,29 M. Elsing ,36 D. Emeliyanov ,134 Y. Enari ,153 I. Ene ,17a S. Epari ,13 J. Erdmann ,49 P. A. Erland ,86 M. Errenst ,171 M. Escalier ,66 C. Escobar ,163 E. Etzion ,151 G. Evans ,130a H. Evans ,68 L. S. Evans ,95 M. O. Evans ,146 A. Ezhilov ,37 S. Ezzarqtouni ,35a F. Fabbri ,59 L. Fabbri ,23b,23a G. Facini ,96 V. Fadeyev ,136 R. M. Fakhrutdinov ,37 S. Falciano ,75a L. F. Falda Ulhoa Coelho ,36 P. J. Falke ,24 J. Faltova ,133 C. Fan ,162 Y. Fan ,14a Y. Fang ,14a,14e M. Fanti ,71a,71b M. Faraj ,69a,69b Z. Farazpay,97 A. Farbin ,8A. Farilla ,77a T. Farooque ,107 S. M. Farrington ,52 F. Fassi ,35e D. Fassouliotis ,9M. Faucci Giannelli ,76a,76b W. J. Fawcett ,32 L. Fayard ,66 P. Federic ,133 P. Federicova ,131 O. L. Fedin ,37,m G. Fedotov ,37 M. Feickert ,170 L. Feligioni ,102 D. E. Fellers ,123 C. Feng ,62b M. Feng ,14b Z. Feng ,114 M. J. Fenton ,160 A. B. Fenyuk,37 L. Ferencz ,48 R. A. M. Ferguson ,91 S. I. Fernandez Luengo ,137f M. J. V. Fernoux ,102 J. Ferrando ,48 A. Ferrari ,161 P. Ferrari ,114,113 R. Ferrari ,73a D. Ferrere ,56 C. Ferretti ,106 F. Fiedler ,100 A. Filipčič,93 E. K. Filmer ,1F. Filthaut ,113 M. C. N. Fiolhais ,130a,130c,r L. Fiorini ,163 W. C. Fisher ,107 T. Fitschen ,101 P. M. Fitzhugh,135 I. Fleck ,141 P. Fleischmann ,106 T. Flick ,171 L. Flores ,128 M. Flores ,33d,s L. R. Flores Castillo ,64a L. Flores Sanz De Acedo,36 F. M. Follega ,78a,78b N. Fomin ,16 J. H. Foo ,155 B. C. Forland,68 A. Formica ,135 A. C. Forti ,101 E. Fortin ,36 A. W. Fortman ,61 M. G. Foti ,17a L. Fountas ,9,t D. Fournier ,66 H. Fox ,91 P. Francavilla ,74a,74b S. Francescato ,61 S. Franchellucci ,56 M. Franchini ,23b,23a S. Franchino ,63a D. Francis,36 L. Franco ,113 L. Franconi ,48 M. Franklin ,61 G. Frattari ,26 A. C. Freegard ,94 W. S. Freund ,82b Y. Y. Frid ,151 N. Fritzsche ,50 A. Froch ,54 D. Froidevaux ,36 J. A. Frost ,126 Y. Fu ,62a M. Fujimoto ,118 E. Fullana Torregrosa ,163,a K. Y. Fung ,64a E. Furtado De Simas Filho,82b M. Furukawa ,153 J. Fuster ,163 A. Gabrielli ,23b,23a A. Gabrielli ,155 P. Gadow ,48 G. Gagliardi ,57b,57a L. G. Gagnon ,17a E. J. Gallas ,126 B. J. Gallop ,134 K. K. Gan ,119 S. Ganguly ,153 J. Gao ,62a Y. Gao ,52 F. M. Garay Walls ,137a,137b B. Garcia,29,i C. García,163 A. Garcia Alonso ,114 A. G. Garcia Caffaro ,172 J. E. García Navarro,163 M. Garcia-Sciveres ,17a G. L. Gardner ,128 R. W. Gardner ,39 N. Garelli ,158 D. Garg ,80 R. B. Garg ,143,u J. M. Gargan,52 C. A. Garner,155 S. J. Gasiorowski ,138 P. Gaspar ,82b G. Gaudio ,73a V. Gautam,13 P. Gauzzi ,75a,75b I. L. Gavrilenko ,37 A. Gavrilyuk ,37 C. Gay ,164 G. Gaycken ,48 E. N. Gazis ,10 A. A. Geanta ,27b C. M. Gee ,136 C. Gemme ,57b M. H. Genest ,60 S. Gentile ,75a,75b S. George ,95 W. F. George ,20 T. Geralis ,46 P. Gessinger-Befurt ,36 M. E. Geyik ,171 M. Ghneimat ,141 K. Ghorbanian ,94 A. Ghosal ,141 A. Ghosh ,160 A. Ghosh ,7B. Giacobbe ,23b S. Giagu ,75a,75b P. Giannetti ,74a A. Giannini ,62a S. M. Gibson ,95 M. Gignac ,136 D. T. Gil ,85b A. K. Gilbert ,85a B. J. Gilbert ,41 D. Gillberg ,34 G. Gilles ,114 N. E. K. Gillwald ,48 L. Ginabat ,127 D. M. Gingrich ,2,e M. P. Giordani ,69a,69c P. F. Giraud ,135 G. Giugliarelli ,69a,69c D. Giugni ,71a F. Giuli ,36 I. Gkialas ,9,t L. K. Gladilin ,37 C. Glasman ,99 G. R. Gledhill ,123 M. Glisic,123 I. Gnesi ,43b,v Y. Go ,29,i PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 131, 162301 (2023) 162301-9 P. Yin ,41 K. Yorita ,168 S. Younas ,27b C. J. S. Young ,54 C. Young ,143 Y. Yu ,62a M. Yuan ,106 R. Yuan ,62b,nn L. Yue ,96 M. Zaazoua ,62a B. Zabinski ,86 E. Zaid,52 T. Zakareishvili ,149b N. Zakharchuk ,34 S. Zambito ,56 J. A. Zamora Saa ,137d,137b J. Zang ,153 D. Zanzi ,54 O. Zaplatilek ,132 C. Zeitnitz ,171 H. Zeng ,14a J. C. Zeng ,162 D. T. Zenger Jr.,26 O. Zenin ,37 T. Ženiš,28a S. Zenz ,94 S. Zerradi ,35a D. Zerwas ,66 M. Zhai ,14a,14e B. Zhang ,14c D. F. Zhang ,139 J. Zhang ,62b J. Zhang ,6K. Zhang ,14a,14e L. Zhang ,14c P. Zhang,14a,14e R. Zhang ,170 S. Zhang ,106 T. Zhang ,153 X. Zhang ,62c X. Zhang ,62b Y. Zhang ,62c,5 Y. Zhang ,96 Z. Zhang ,17a Z. Zhang ,66 H. Zhao ,138 P. Zhao ,51 T. Zhao ,62b Y. Zhao ,136 Z. Zhao ,62a A. Zhemchugov ,38 K. Zheng ,162 X. Zheng ,62a Z. Zheng ,143 D. Zhong ,162 B. Zhou,106 H. Zhou ,7N. Zhou ,62c Y. Zhou,7C. G. Zhu ,62b J. Zhu ,106 Y. Zhu ,62c Y. Zhu ,62a X. Zhuang ,14a K. Zhukov ,37 V. Zhulanov ,37 N. I. Zimine ,38 J. Zinsser ,63b M. Ziolkowski ,141 L. Živković,15 A. Zoccoli ,23b,23a K. Zoch ,56 T. G. Zorbas ,139 O. Zormpa ,46 W. Zou ,41 and L. Zwalinski 36 (ATLAS Collaboration) 1Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 2Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 3aDepartment of Physics, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye 3bDivision of Physics, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara, Türkiye 4LAPP, Universit´e Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS/IN2P3, Annecy, France 5APC, Universit´e Paris Cit´e, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France 6High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, USA 7Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA 8Department of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA 9Physics Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece 10Physics Department, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou, Greece 11Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA 12Institute of Physics, Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan 13Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain 14aInstitute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 14bPhysics Department, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China 14cDepartment of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China 14dSchool of Science, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China 14eUniversity of Chinese Academy of Science (UCAS), Beijing, China 15Institute of Physics, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia 16Department for Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway 17aPhysics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA 17bUniversity of California, Berkeley, California, USA 18Institut für Physik, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany 19Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics and Laboratory for High Energy Physics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland 20School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom 21aDepartment of Physics, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Türkiye 21bDepartment of Physics Engineering, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Türkiye 21cDepartment of Physics, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye 21dIstinye University, Sariyer, Istanbul, Türkiye 22aFacultad de Ciencias y Centro de Investigaciónes, Universidad Antonio Nariño, Bogotá, Colombia 22bDepartamento de Física, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia 22cPontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia 23aDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia A. Righi, Universit`a di Bologna, Bologna, Italy 23bINFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy 24Physikalisches Institut, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany 25Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 26Department of Physics, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA 27aTransilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania 27bHoria Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest, Romania 27cDepartment of Physics, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Iasi, Romania 27dNational Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies, Physics Department, Cluj-Napoca, Romania PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 131, 162301 (2023) 162301-16 27eUniversity Politehnica Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania 27fWest University in Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania 27gFaculty of Physics, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania 28aFaculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic 28bDepartment of Subnuclear Physics, Institute of Experimental Physics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Kosice, Slovak Republic 29Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA 30Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Física, y CONICET, Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires (IFIBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina 31California State University, Sacramento, California, USA 32Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom 33aDepartment of Physics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa 33biThemba Labs, Western Cape, South Africa 33cDepartment of Mechanical Engineering Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa 33dNational Institute of Physics, University of the Philippines Diliman (Philippines), Quezon City, Philippines 33eUniversity of South Africa, Department of Physics, Pretoria, South Africa 33fUniversity of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa, South Africa 33gSchool of Physics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa 34Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 35aFacult´e des Sciences Ain Chock, R´eseau Universitaire de Physique des Hautes Energies - Universit´e Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco 35bFacult´e des Sciences, Universit´e Ibn-Tofail, K´enitra, Morocco 35cFacult´e des Sciences Semlalia, Universit´e Cadi Ayyad, LPHEA-Marrakech, Morocco 35dLPMR, Facult´e des Sciences, Universit´e Mohamed Premier, Oujda, Morocco 35eFacult´e des sciences, Universit´e Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco 35fInstitute of Applied Physics, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Ben Guerir, Morocco 36CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 37Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN 38Affiliated with an international laboratory covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN 39Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA 40LPC, Universit´e Clermont Auvergne, CNRS/IN2P3, Clermont-Ferrand, France 41Nevis Laboratory, Columbia University, Irvington, New York, USA 42Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark 43aDipartimento di Fisica, Universit`a della Calabria, Rende, Italy 43bINFN Gruppo Collegato di Cosenza, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Rende, Italy 44Physics Department, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, USA 45Physics Department, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA 46National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, Agia Paraskevi, Greece 47aDepartment of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden 47bOskar Klein Centre, Stockholm, Sweden 48Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg and Zeuthen, Germany 49Fakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany 50Institut für Kernund Teilchenphysik, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany 51Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA 52SUPA - School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom 53INFN e Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy 54Physikalisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany 55II. Physikalisches Institut, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany 56D´epartement de Physique Nucl´eaire et Corpusculaire, Universit´e de Gen`eve, Gen`eve, Switzerland 57aDipartimento di Fisica, Universit`a di Genova, Genova, Italy 57bINFN Sezione di Genova, Genova, Italy 58II. Physikalisches Institut, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Giessen, Germany 59SUPA - School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom 60LPSC, Universit´e Grenoble Alpes, CNRS/IN2P3, Grenoble INP, Grenoble, France 61Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA 62aDepartment of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China 62bInstitute of Frontier and Interdisciplinary Science and Key Laboratory of Particle Physics and Particle Irradiation (MOE), Shandong University, Qingdao, China 62cSchool of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Key Laboratory for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (MOE), SKLPPC, Shanghai, China PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 131, 162301 (2023) 162301-17 62dTsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai, China 63aKirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany 63bPhysikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany 64aDepartment of Physics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China 64bDepartment of Physics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China 64cDepartment of Physics and Institute for Advanced Study, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China 65Department of Physics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan 66IJCLab, Universit´e Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, 91405, Orsay, France 67Centro Nacional de Microelectrónica (IMB-CNM-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain 68Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA 69aINFN Gruppo Collegato di Udine, Sezione di Trieste, Udine, Italy 69bICTP, Trieste, Italy 69cDipartimento Politecnico di Ingegneria e Architettura, Universit`a di Udine, Udine, Italy 70aINFN Sezione di Lecce, Lecce, Italy 70bDipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Universit`a del Salento, Lecce, Italy 71aINFN Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy 71bDipartimento di Fisica, Universit`a di Milano, Milano, Italy 72aINFN Sezione di Napoli, Napoli, Italy 72bDipartimento di Fisica, Universit`a di Napoli, Napoli, Italy 73aINFN Sezione di Pavia, Pavia, Italy 73bDipartimento di Fisica, Universit`a di Pavia, Pavia, Italy 74aINFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy 74bDipartimento di Fisica E. Fermi, Universit`a di Pisa, Pisa, Italy 75aINFN Sezione di Roma, Roma, Italy 75bDipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Universit`a di Roma, Roma, Italy 76aINFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy 76bDipartimento di Fisica, Universit`a di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy 77aINFN Sezione di Roma Tre, Roma, Italy 77bDipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Universit`a Roma Tre, Roma, Italy 78aINFN-TIFPA, Trento, Italy 78bUniversit`a degli Studi di Trento, Trento, Italy 79Universität Innsbruck, Department of Astro and Particle Physics, Innsbruck, Austria 80University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA 81Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA 82aDepartamento de Engenharia El´etrica, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, Brazil 82bUniversidade Federal do Rio De Janeiro COPPE/EE/IF, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 82cInstituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil 82dRio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 83KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Tsukuba, Japan 84Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan 85aAGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Krakow, Poland 85bMarian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland 86Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland 87Faculty of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan 88Kyoto University of Education, Kyoto, Japan 89Research Center for Advanced Particle Physics and Department of Physics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan 90Instituto de Física La Plata, Universidad Nacional de La Plata and CONICET, La Plata, Argentina 91Physics Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom 92Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom 93Department of Experimental Particle Physics, Jožef Stefan Institute and Department of Physics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia 94School of Physics and Astronomy, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom 95Department of Physics, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, United Kingdom 96Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom 97Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana, USA 98Fysiska institutionen, Lunds universitet, Lund, Sweden 99Departamento de Física Teorica C-15 and CIAFF, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain 100Institut für Physik, Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany 101School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 131, 162301 (2023) 162301-18 102CPPM, Aix-Marseille Universit´e, CNRS/IN2P3, Marseille, France 103Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA 104Department of Physics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 105School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 106Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA 107Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA 108Group of Particle Physics, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 109Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany 110Max-Planck-Institut für Physik (Werner-Heisenberg-Institut), München, Germany 111Graduate School of Science and Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan 112Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA 113Institute for Mathematics, Astrophysics and Particle Physics, Radboud University/Nikhef, Nijmegen, Netherlands 114Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands 115Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA 116aNew York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates 116bUniversity of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates 117Department of Physics, New York University, New York, New York, USA 118Ochanomizu University, Otsuka, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan 119Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA 120Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA 121Department of Physics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA 122Palacký University, Joint Laboratory of Optics, Olomouc, Czech Republic 123Institute for Fundamental Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA 124Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan 125Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway 126Department of Physics, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom 127LPNHE, Sorbonne Universit´e, Universit´e Paris Cit´e, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France 128Department of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA 129Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA 130aLaboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas - LIP, Lisboa, Portugal 130bDepartamento de Física, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal 130cDepartamento de Física, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal 130dCentro de Física Nuclear da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal 130eDepartamento de Física, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal 130fDepartamento de Física Teórica y del Cosmos, Universidad de Granada, Granada (Spain), Spain 130gDepartamento de Física, Instituto Superior T´ecnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal 131Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic 132Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic 133Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic 134Particle Physics Department, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom 135IRFU, CEA, Universit´e Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France 136Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA 137aDepartamento de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile 137bMillennium Institute for Subatomic physics at high energy frontier (SAPHIR), Santiago, Chile 137cInstituto de Investigación Multidisciplinario en Ciencia y Tecnología, y Departamento de Física, Universidad de La Serena, La Serena, Chile 137dUniversidad Andres Bello, Department of Physics, Santiago, Chile 137eInstituto de Alta Investigación, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica, Chile 137fDepartamento de Física, Universidad T´ecnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso, Chile 138Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA 139Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom 140Department of Physics, Shinshu University, Nagano, Japan 141Department Physik, Universität Siegen, Siegen, Germany 142Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada 143SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford, California, USA 144Department of Physics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden 145Departments of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA 146Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom 147School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia 148Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 131, 162301 (2023) 162301-19 149aE. Andronikashvili Institute of Physics, Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia 149bHigh Energy Physics Institute, Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia 149cUniversity of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia 150Department of Physics, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel 151Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel 152Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece 153International Center for Elementary Particle Physics and Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan 154Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan 155Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 156aTRIUMF, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 156bDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 157Division of Physics and Tomonaga Center for the History of the Universe, Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan 158Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA 159United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates 160Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA 161Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden 162Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA 163Instituto de Física Corpuscular (IFIC), Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia - CSIC, Valencia, Spain 164Department of Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 165Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada 166Fakultät für Physik und Astronomie, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany 167Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom 168Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan 169Department of Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel 170Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA 171Fakultät für Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften, Fachgruppe Physik, Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany 172Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA aDeceased. bAlso at Department of Physics, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom. cAlso at Institute of Physics, Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan. dAlso at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA. eAlso at TRIUMF, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. fAlso at Department of Physics, University of Thessaly, Greece. gAlso at An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine. hAlso at Department of Physics, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland. iAlso at University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Physics, Boulder, Colorado, USA. jAlso at Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria BC, Canada. kAlso at Department of Physics, Westmont College, Santa Barbara, USA. lAlso at Departament de Fisica de la Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. mAlso at Affiliated with an institute covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN. nAlso at The Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter (CICQM), Beijing, China. oAlso at Department of Physics, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel. pAlso at Universit`a di Napoli Parthenope, Napoli, Italy. qAlso at Institute of Particle Physics (IPP), Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. rAlso at Borough of Manhattan Community College, City University of New York, New York, New York, USA. sAlso at National Institute of Physics, University of the Philippines Diliman (Philippines), Philippines. tAlso at Department of Financial and Management Engineering, University of the Aegean, Chios, Greece. uAlso at Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. vAlso at Centro Studi e Ricerche Enrico Fermi, Italy. wAlso at Institucio Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avancats, ICREA, Barcelona, Spain. xAlso at Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. yAlso at Institute of Theoretical Physics, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia. zAlso at CERN, Geneva, Switzerland. aaAlso at Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI-AUTH), Thessaloniki, Greece. bbAlso at Hellenic Open University, Patras, Greece. ccAlso at Center for High Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijin, China. ddAlso at APC, Universit´e Paris Cit´e, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France. eeAlso at Department of Physics, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, United Kingdom. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 131, 162301 (2023) 162301-20 ffAlso at L2IT, Universit´e de Toulouse, CNRS/IN2P3, UPS, Toulouse, France. ggAlso at Department of Physics, California State University, Sacramento, California, USA. hhAlso at D´epartement de Physique Nucl´eaire et Corpusculaire, Universit´e de Gen`eve, Gen`eve, Switzerland. iiAlso at Fakultät für Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften, Fachgruppe Physik, Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany. jjAlso at Washington College, Chestertown, Maryland, USA. kkAlso at Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. llAlso at Institute of Applied Physics, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Ben Guerir, Morocco. mmAlso at Institute of Physics and Technology, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. nnAlso at Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 131, 162301 (2023) 162301-21