scieee Open visual document viewer

Metaproteogenomic insights beyond bacterial response to naphthalene exposure and bio-stimulation

Guazzaroni, María Eugenia,Herbst, Florian-Alexander,Lores Ovies, Iván,Tamames, J.,Peláez Andrés, Ana Isabel,López Cortés, N.,Alcaide, M.,Pozo, M. V. del,Vieites, José María,Von Bergen, M.,Rodríguez Gallego, José Luis,Bargiela, Rafael,López López, A.,Piep

Abstract

This research was supported by the Spanish CSD2007- 00005 and CENIT-07-CLEAM projects and by FEDER funds, ERANET (GEN2006-27750-C5-5-E/SYS), and the European Community Projects MAGICPAH (FP7-KBBE- 2009-245226) and ULIXES (FP7-KBBE-2010-266473). M-EG thanks the CSIC for a JAE fellowship, and IL thanks FICYT, Principado de Asturias for a Severo Ochoa fellowship. We also thank Professor Michail M Yakimov, Jesu´ s Torne´s and Michael Richter for assistance in the bacterial diversity analyses. Project has been registered as umbrella BioProject at NCBI with the ID PRJNA5851. Metagenomic sequences aredeposited in Short Read Archive (http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/sra) with accession number SRA053109. The GenBank accession numbers for nucleotide sequences are HQ218445 to HQ218870 and JX310869 to JX311048.

Full text

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Me ap o eogenomic insigh s beyond bac e ial esponse o naph halene exposu e and bio-s imula ion Ma ı ´a-Eugenia Guazza oni 1,9,11 , Flo ian-Alexande He bs 2,9 ,I a ´nLo es 3,9 , Ja ie Tamames 4,9 , Ana Isabel Pela ´ez 3 , Nie es Lo ´pez-Co e ´s 1 , Ma ı ´a Alcaide 1 , Me cedes V Del Pozo 1 , Jose ´Ma ı ´a Viei es 1 , Ma in on Be gen 2,5 , Jose ´Luis R Gallego 6 , Ra ael Ba giela 1 , A an xa Lo ´pez-Lo ´pez 7 , Die ma H Piepe 8 , Ramo ´n Rossello ´-Mo ´ a 7 , Jesu ´sSa ´nchez 3,10 , Jana Sei e 2,10 and Manuel Fe e 1,10 1 Depa men o Bioca alysis, Ins i u e o Ca alysis, CSIC, Mad id, Spain; 2 Depa men o P o eomics, UFZ-Helmhol z-Zen um u¨ Umwel o schung GmbH, Leipzig, Ge many; 3 A ´ ea de Mic obiologı ´a, IUBA, Facul ad de Medicina, Uni e sidad de O iedo, O iedo, Spain; 4 CSIC, Cen o Nacional de Bio ecnologı ´a, Mad id, Spain; 5 Depa men o Me abolomics, UFZ-Helmhol z-Zen um u¨ Umwel o schung GmbH, Leipzig, Ge many; 6 IUBA, A ´ ea de P ospeccio ´n e In es igacio ´n Mine a, Uni e sidad de O iedo, Mie es, Spain; 7 IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB), Espo les, Spain and 8 Helmhol z Zen um u¨ In ek ions o schung–HZI, B aunschweig, Ge many Mic obial me abolism in a oma ic-con amina ed en i onmen s has impo an ecological implica ions, and ob aining a comple e unde s anding o his p ocess emains a ele an goal. To unde s and he oles o biodi e si y and a oma ic-media ed gene ic and me abolic ea angemen s, we conduc ed ‘OMIC’ in es iga ions in an an h opogenically in luenced and polya oma ic hyd oca bon (PAH)-con amina ed soil wi h (Nbs) o wi hou (N) bio-s imula ion wi h calcium ammonia ni a e, NH 4 NO 3 and KH 2 PO 4 and he comme cial su ac an I eysol, plus wo naph halene-en iched communi ies de i ed om bo h soils (CN2 and CN1, espec i ely). Using a me agenomic app oach, a o al o 52, 53, 14 and 12 dis inc species (acco ding o ope a ional phylogene ic uni s (OPU) in ou wo k equi alen o axonomic species) we e iden i ied in he N, Nbs, CN1 and CN2 communi ies, espec i ely. App oxima ely 10 ou o 95 dis inc species and 238 ou o 3293 clus e s o o hologous g oups (COGs) p o ein amilies iden i ied we e clea ly s imula ed unde he assayed condi ions, whe eas only wo species and 1465 COGs con o med o he common se in all o he mesocosms. Resul s indica ed dis inc biodeg ada ion capabili ies o he u ilisa ion o po en ial g ow h-suppo ing a oma ics, which esul s in bio-s imula ed communi ies being ex emely i o naph halene u ilisa ion and non-s imula ed communi ies exhibi ing a g ea e me abolic window han p e iously p edic ed. On he basis o compa ing p o ein exp ession p o iles and me agenome da a se s, in e -alia in e ac ions among membe s we e hypo hesised. The u ilisa ion o cu a ed da abases is discussed and used o i s ime o econs uc ‘p esump i e’ deg ada ion ne wo ks o complex mic obial communi ies. The ISME Jou nal (2013) 7, 122–136; doi:10.1038/ismej.2012.82; published online 26 July 2012 Subjec Ca ego y: in eg a ed genomics and pos –genomics app oaches in mic obial ecology Keywo ds: biodi e si y; bio-s imula ion; label- ee p o ein quan i ica ion; me agenomics; me ap o eomics; polya oma ic hyd oca bon In oduc ion Polya oma ic hyd oca bons (PAHs) a e widely dis- ibu ed in he en i onmen owing o hei abundance in c ude oil and hei widesp ead use in chemical manu ac u ing (Ka ¨s ne , 2000). PAHs a e pollu an s o g ea conce n owing o hei oxici y, mu agenici y and ca cinogenici y. A numbe o mic oo ganisms, ia he ac ion o Rieske non-haem i on oxygenases, ha e he abili y o g ow on PAHs as a sole ca bon and ene gy sou ce (Beil e al., 1998; Roling e al., 2003; Wi zig e al.,2006;Penge al., 2008). The majo i y o e o s aimed a unde s anding mic obial esponses o a oma ic compounds ha e Co espondence: J Sa ´nchez, A ´ ea de Mic obiologı ´a, IUBA, Facul ad de Medicina, Uni e sidad de O iedo, O iedo, Spain. E-mail: [email p o ec ed] o J Sei e , Depa men o P o eomics, UFZ-Helmhol z-Zen um u ¨ Umwel o schung GmbH, Leipzig, Ge many. E-mail: [email p o ec ed] o M Fe e , Depa men o Bioca alysis, Ins i u e o Ca alysis, CSIC, Ma ie Cu ie 2, Mad id 28049, Spain. E-mail: [email p o ec ed]s 9 These au ho s con ibu ed equally o his wo k. 10 These au ho s con ibu ed equally o his wo k. 11 Cu en add ess: Labo a o y o Molecula Ecology, Cen o de As obiologı ´a (CSIC-INTA), Ca e e a de Ajal i km 4, To ejo ´nde A doz 28850, Mad id, Spain. Recei ed 9 Janua y 2012; e ised 11 June 2012; accep ed 11 June 2012; published online 26 July 2012 The ISME Jou nal (2013) 7, 122–136 & 2013 In e na ional Socie y o Mic obial Ecology All igh s ese ed 1751-7362/13 www.na u e.com/ismej been ocused on genomic (Jime ´nez e al., 2002; Nogales e al., 2008; Pucha"ka e al., 2008), an- sc ip omic (Domı ´nguez-Cue as e al., 2006; Yus e e al., 2006) and p o eomic (San os e al., 2004; Segu a e al., 2005; Kim e al., 2006; Ku ba o e al., 2006; Toma ´s-Galla do e al., 2006) analyses con- duc ed in pu e cul u es. Among PAH-(including naph halene, luo ene, phenan h ene, py ene and dibenzo u an, o ci e some) mine alising s ains, a numbe o bac e ia ha e ecei ed special a en ion. Those include membe s o he common gene a o Pseudomonas,Sphingomonas,Cycloclas icus, Bu kholde ia,Rhodococcus,Pola omonas, some no el gene a o Nep unomonas and Janibac e ,some he mophilic bac e ia o Noca dia and Bacillus, some anoxic bac e ia o Del ap o eobac e ia and Alcaligenes, and high molecula weigh PAH- deg ading bac e ia o Mycobac e ium,S eno opho- monas and Pas eu ella; a lis wi h known pu e bac e ial cul u es capable o deg ading PAHs can be seen in a ecen e iew by Lu e al. (2011). Howe e , a la ge numbe o cul u e-independen echniques ha e shown ha pollu an -deg ading o ganismsen ichedin helabo a o yo endono ha e an impo an ole in he in si u biodeg ada ion o pollu an s and ha he di e si y o pollu an -deg ad- ing o ganisms in pollu ed en i onmen al samples is much g ea e han he di e si y de e mined om cul i a ion (Abulencia e al., 2006; Liu e al., 2009; Bo onin and Koshele a, 2010; Yagi e al., 2010; Liang e al., 2011). Unde his scena io, i is ele an o use molecula mic obial ools o de ine key ca abolic playe s a con amina ed si es o p edic pollu an deg ada ion ne wo ks in he en i onmen and o sugges me hods o a ional in e en ion associa ed wi h he implemen a ion o bio emedia ion (Vilchez- Va gas e al., 2010). Howe e , he numbe o in e- g a i e ‘omic’ in es iga ions ha ha e been ca ied ou in PAH-associa ed mic obial communi ies is limi ed (Kweon e al., 2007; Powell e al., 2008; Selesi e al., 2010), because o he incomple e genomic in o ma ion and cu a ed da abases a ailable (Pe ´ ez-Pan oja e al., 2009, 2012). Taking all o he abo e in o ma ion in o consid- e a ion, we pe o med a ho ough and holis ic (o ecosys ems biology app oach) phylogene ic, unc- ional and p o eomic analysis o he key playe s in a sample o s ongly an h opogenically in luenced, PAH-con amina ed soil (N) and a naph halene- en iched communi y de i ed om his soil (CN1). This s udy was ca ied ou using also samples o he same soil bio-s imula ed wi h calcium ammonia ni a e, NH 4 NO 3 and KH 2 PO 4 , and he comme cial su ac an I eysol (I ey In e na ional Inc., Campbell Ri e , BC, Canada) (he ein e e ed as Nbs), and he naph halene-en iched communi y de i ed om i (CN2). In all cases, he biodeg ada ion ne wo ks o he espec i e whole communi ies we e econ- s uc ed. This s udy cla i ied he genomic and p o eomic basis o he pu pose o unde s anding mic obial biodi e si y, ecology and unc ion in esponse o bo h PAHs ( ep esen ed by naph halene) and bio-s imula ion. I should be no ed ha ou me ap o eomic in es iga ions we e es ic ed o naph halene-en iched communi ies because o hei lowe complexi y as compa ed wi h he soil samples as well as he la ge assembled sequences ob ained h ough di ec py o-sequencing o bo h samples. Ma e ials and me hods Gene al me hods and ‘OMIC’ da a analysis and p ocessing Full desc ip ions o he ma e ials and me hods used o soil cha ac e isa ion; hyd oca bon analysis; DNA ex ac ion; cons uc ion o 16 S RNA gene clone lib a ies, sequencing and phylogene ic analysis; dena u ing g adien gel elec opho esis analysis; me agenomic se up and sequencing, assembly and gene p edic ion; me ap o eomic se up and p o ein ex ac ion, sepa a ion and iden i ica ion and da a p ocessing a e a ailable in he Supplemen a y Ma e ials and me hods. Soil sample collec ion and p epa a ion o bio- s imula ed soil and en ichmen cul u es Soil samples (he ein e e ed o as N) we e ob ained om a pa cel on he no he n Ibe ian Peninsula con iguous o a chemical plan (Lugones, O iedo, Spain; 4011803300N, 313903100W, a an al i ude o 300 m). The chemical plan (Supplemen a y Figu e S1) was used o se e al decades o he p oduc ion o naph halene, phenols and o he compounds om coal a p ocessing as well as o manu ac u ing esins. A conside able amoun o o he chemical p oduc s (pes icides, sol en s, e c.) was s o ed, al hough p obably no manu ac u ed, in he plan . In 1989 he plan was closed and hen used o yea s o s o e chemical was e, pa icula ly polychlo i- na ed biphenyls, coolan s and o he unspeci ied p oduc s. In 2006 mos o he buildings we e demolished and he cha ac e isa ion o soil con am- ina ion s a ed. Thus, a signi ican amoun o he PAH de ec ed we e concei ably o med by he en iched bac e ial popula ions p esen in he soil h ough a na u al a enua ion e ec . The op soil was sampled a a dep h o 0–30 cm on Feb ua y 2007 (soil empe a u e 18 1C). Th ee eplica es (1 kg each) we e collec ed wi hin a 1 m dis ance, and he samples we e kep in open plas ic bags in he da k a 4 1C. Vege a ion and o he non-soil ma e ials, including cobbles, we e emo ed p io o homo- genising he samples. Immedia ely a e acqui ing he soil samples, hey we e sie ed (2-mm mesh size), ollowed by mixing o ep esen a i e subsam- ples o he iplica es samples, and 100 g aliquo s o sample N we e used o chemical analysis. In addi ion, 10 g aliquo s we e s o ed a 20 1Cin s e ile lasks o DNA- and p o eome-based analyses. Bio emedia ion was pe o med o e app oxi- ma ely 900 m 3 o he con amina ed soil (N), whe e Mic obial esponse o polya oma ics M-E Guazza oni e al 123 The ISME Jou nal 9 ons o dehyd a ed calcium ammonia ni a e and 3 ons o a mix u e o dehyd a ed NH 4 NO 3 and KH 2 PO 4 combined wi h 4500 l o he comme cial su ac an I eysol we e applied o he homogenised soil. The C:N:P a io ha was applied was 100:10: 1, as ecommended o bio emedia ion pu poses (Gallego e al., 2007a). The ea men was pe o med o e 231 days, and he biopile was ou inely wa e ed and illed o main ain humidi y (15–20%) and adequa e oxygena ion. Samples o he op bio-s imula ed soil, he ein named Nbs, we e aken and p ocessed using he same p o ocols as desc ibed abo e o he o iginal soil. En ichmen cul u es we e pe o med in Bushnell Haas (Sigma Chemical Co., S Louis, MO, USA) mine al medium ha con ained naph halene a a concen a ion o 0.1% (w/ ) as he sole ca bon sou ce as desc ibed p e iously (Gallego e al., 2007b). The composi ion o he medium was as ollows: MgSO 4 H 2 O (0.20 g l 1 ), CaCl 2 2H 2 O (0.02 g l 1 ), KH 2 PO 4 (1.0 g l 1 ), K 2 HPO 4 (1.0 g l 1 ), NH 4 NO 3 (1.0 g l 1 ) and FeCl 3 (0.05 g l 1 ). Two di e en inocula we e used. The CN1 en ichmen cul u e was ob ained by inocula ing 1 g o he pollu ed soil (N) in o a lask con aining 100 ml o he cul u e medium; he CN2 cul u e was inocula ed wi h 1 g o he same soil ha had been subjec ed o a massi e bio emedia ion (bio-s imula ion) p ocess (Nbs). The en ichmen cul u es we e incuba ed a 30 1C and 250 .p.m., in which 0.1% ( / ) o he cul u e was ans e ed o esh medium each week. Resul s and discussion Sample cha ac e is ics An ag onomic analysis o he soil N e ealed a loamy clay soil wi h a pH o 8.2 and a conduc i i y o 0.13 dS m 1 clea ly con aining low amoun s o he ypically p edominan ions (calcium, magne- sium, po assium and sodium); he de ec ed na u al o ganic ma e , ni ogen and phospho us le els in he soil (Supplemen a y Table S1) a e cha ac- e is ic o in e ile soils. Gas ch oma og aphy–mass spec ome y (GC–MS) was used o quan i y he le els o he 16 EPA (En i onmen al P o ec ion Agency) p io i y PAHs p esen in he soil (Supplemen a y Figu e S2). To ally, he soil exhib- i ed an a e age concen a ion o 805 mg PAH pe kg (Table 1), which is in he ange o sligh ly lowe o he le el ound in p e iously epo ed PAH con amina ed soils ( ha is, 1667 mg kg 1 in Nı ´ Chadhain e al. (2006); 589 mg kg 1 in Richa dson e al. (2012); 335–8645 mg kg 1 in Tha amani e al. (2012); 3000 mg kg 1 in Lo s e al. (2012)). The bio- s imula ed soil exhibi ed a o al concen a ion o 221.6 mg kg 1 (a e age) o he 16 EPA p io i y PAHs and he quan i ied compounds a e lis ed in Table 1. The deg ada ion a e o naph halene in N was oo low and was di icul o be es ablished owing o he long ime anscu ed in he p esence o he con aminan s; howe e , once submi ed o bio- s imula ion, we calcula ed he deg ada ion a e o naph halene in soil om ime 0 o 231 days: 1.818 mg kg 1 soil pe day. Dena u ing g adien gel elec opho esis was used o su ey he de elopmen o he mic obial commu- ni ies in he en ichmen cul u es and o deduce he ime poin a which a s able communi y was ob ained. We obse ed ha he dena u ing g adien gel elec opho esis p o iles o CN1 en ichmen cul u es changed be ween he 45 and 60 ans e s (Supplemen a y Figu e S3); changes in he p o iles we e also obse ed o CN2 a e 35 and 60 ans e s. These changes we e subsequen ly main ained and samples subjec ed o a leas 60 ans e s we e he ein used o u he in es iga ions. The majo bands we e excised and sequenced, and hei a ilia ion e ealed he p esence o mic oo ganisms iden i ied as membe s o he gene a Ach omobac e , Fla obac e ium and Acido o ax in bo h en ich- men s, and Pseudomonas,Mic obac e ium,Lysobac- e and o an endosymbion o Acan homaeba in CN2. Resul s indica ed ha conso ia CN1 and CN2 we e able o deg ade 97% naph halene a an ini ial concen a ion o 1000 p.p.m. wi hin 72 and 80 h, espec i ely. Bac e ial di e si y and composi ion bluep in s DNA isola ed om each in es iga ed mic obial communi y was employed o a PCR-based 16S ecombinan DNA ( DNA) gene di e si y su ey o he communi y s uc u es in he samples. Fo his pu pose, clone lib a ies we e cons uc ed as Table 1 Le el o 16 EPA p io i y PAHs p esen in he o iginal (N) and bio-s imula ed (Nbs) soils PAH Concen a ion (mg kg 1 ) Soil N Soil Nbs Naph halene 607 174 Acenaph hylene 1.60 0.40 Acenaph hene 16.60 4.40 Fluo ene 20.80 5.96 An h acene 21.20 4.99 Phenan h ene 46.40 24.23 Fluo an hene 30.40 4.73 Py ene 19.40 4.02 Benzo(a)an h acene 12.00 2.83 C ysene 12.50 2.64 Benzo(b) luo an hene 4.40 1.34 Benzo(k) luo an hene 3.10 0.90 Benzo(a)py ene 4.90 1.27 Indene(1,2,3-cd)py ene 3.40 1.58 Benzo(g,h,i)pe ylene 1.50 0.82 Dibenzo(a,h)an h acene 0.79 0.18 Abb e ia ions: N, non-bio-s imula ed polya oma ic hyd oca bon- con amina ed soil; Nbs, bio-s imula ed polya oma ic hyd oca bon- con amina ed soil; PAH, polya oma ic hyd oca bon. Gas ch oma og aphy–mass spec ome y (GC–MS) was used o quan i ica ion. Mic obial esponse o polya oma ics M-E Guazza oni e al 124 The ISME Jou nal desc ibed in he Supplemen a y Ma e ials and me hods, and he clones we e ully sequenced o ob ain he almos comple e cloned 16S DNA gene sequence. Addi ionally, and because o he low yields in he clone lib a ies o Nbs, we used he 16S DNA gene pa ial sequences ob ained in he me agenome su ey. Fo his pu pose, we used only hose sequences ha had a leng h 4600 nucleo ides. All sho e sequences we e disca ded. A o al o 670 sequences ( ha is, N: 212; Nbs: 261 (86 clones þ175 454 pa ial sequences); CN1: 90; CN2: 107) we e ob ained, and analysed. The o e all phylogene ic composi ion in he lib a ies is shown in Figu es 1–3, in which all ope a ional phylogene ic uni s (OPUs) a ilia ed wi h wel e phyla o he domain Bac e ia, namely, P o eobac e ia ollowed o much lowe ex end by Bac e oide es,Ve ucomic obia,Fi mi- cu es,Ac inobac e ia,Chlo o lexi,Cyanobac e ia, Planc omyce es,Spi ochae es and he candida us phyla OP8, TM7 and WCHB1 (Figu e 4). The clones we e classi ied in o 124 bac e ial ope a ional phylogenic uni s (OPUs) (Lo ´pez-Lo ´pez e al., 2010) (Table 2 and Supplemen a y Figu e S2). Highe alues o Shannon–Wiene ’s and Good’s co e age indexes indica ed ha communi ies N and Nbs we e much mo e complex (51 OPUs and 53 OPUs we e de ec ed, espec i ely) han he CN1 and CN2 (13 OPUs and 12 OPUs, espec i ely) commu- ni ies, which we e domina ed by ew mic obial species o s ains and exhibi ed a a he simple s uc u e (Figu es 1–3). I should be ecalled ha each o he dis inc OPUs de ec ed was iden i ied as a pu a i e single species owing o he high sequence iden i y (Ya za e al., 2008). Howe e , i should also be no ed ha he sequencing su ey co e ed o e 75% o he expec ed OPU di e si y in all cases as i can be deduc ed om he high Good’s co e age in all samples (Table 2), and he a e ac ion cu es indica ing closeness o sa u a ion (Supplemen a y Figu e S4). A la ge p opo ion o he ob ained sequences a ilia ed wi h known amilies and clus e ed wi h b anches ep esen ed by cul u ed mic oo ganisms ha ha e p e iously been ound in con amina ed en i onmen s (Figu es 1–3 and Supplemen a y Figu es S5 and S6), and hus, hey do no appea o be speci ic o he soil and he en ichmen samples ha we e in es iga ed he e. Wha e e he case, despi e soil cha ac e is ics and speci ic pollu an s composi ion may di e , he biodi e si y ound in he o iginal soils (N and Figu e 1 A neighbou -joining ee o he p o eobac e ial 16S DNA gene sequences om he gene sequences o igina ed om N, Nbs, CN1 and CN2 communi ies. Fo he econs uc ion, only he almos comple e sequences o he clones om he ou samples had been used. Besides, pa ial 454 sequences o 4600 nucleo- ides we e inse ed in he ee using he Pa simony ool implemen ed in ARB. The numbe o sequences comp ised in each iden i y clus e (OPU) is speci ied o each sample. The colou code o he 16S DNA sequences is as ollows: N (g een), Nbs (pu ple), CN1 (blue), CN2 ( ed). Whe he an OPU con ains sequences o mo e han one sample, he OPU denomina ion is w i en in black ollowed by he code colou and sequence numbe o each s udied sample. Mic obial esponse o polya oma ics M-E Guazza oni e al 125 The ISME Jou nal Nbs) (Shannon indexes o 2.81 and 3.32, espec- i ely) a e in he ange o ha ound in o he PAH- con amina ed soils. Fo example, Shannon indexes o 1.74–2.78 (Vi as e al., 2008), 2.38–2.96 (Tha amani e al., 2012) and 4.87–5.01 (Ma in e al., 2012) we e obse ed in soils ha had been his o ically con amina ed wi h PAHs. The dominan g oup among he Gammap o eo- bac e ia consis ed o membe s o he genus Pseudo- monas (Figu es 2 and 4). The N sequences we e dis ibu ed a he e enly wi hin his genus, wi h app oxima ely 40% o he o al gammap o eo- bac e ial sequences b anching in he P. luo escens, P. ede iksbe gensis and P. amygdale lineages, ollowed by hose a ilia ed wi h he Pseudoxan ho- monas spp. (20%) and P. pu ida (14%) lineages (Supplemen a y Table S2). A simila e en dis ibu- ion was obse ed in he sample Nbs, being as well he membe s o Pseudomonadaceae he mos abun- dan . Howe e , in his case, he Pseudomonas species composi ion shi ed owa ds he majo ep esen a i es P. uomou ensis,P. pe ucinogena, P. s u ze i genomo a 1, and ye undesc ibed Pseudomonas species. These esul s clea ly con as wi h he dis ibu ion o he CN2 sequences, whe e jus ep esen a i es o P. s u ze i (46%) lineages (Supplemen a y Table S2) we e obse ed in acco - dance wi h his being one o he majo ep esen ed lineages in Nbs. Finally, in CN1, no ep esen a ion o he Pseudomonas genus was ound, bu six sequences ep esen ing Pseudoxan homonas we e iden i ied (6% o he o al) (Figu es 1 and 4 and Supplemen a y Table S2); his is in ag eemen wi h p e ious obse a ions made in PAH mic ocosm expe imen s ha sugges ha , al hough, Pseudomonas spp. can be easily en iched and use a a ie y o o ganic subs a es, hey may be ep essed by o he P o eobac e ia (Rhee e al., 2004). The alphap o eobac e ial sequences de ec ed in N we e widely dis ibu ed among Rhizobium, De osia,No osphingobium,Sphingomonas and B e undimonas, which we e he mos ep esen ed ;;)1VG1UPO (Pseudomonas s u ze i 1N 12Nsb 48CN2 sbN3)(2UPO Pseudomonas alcaligenes Pseudomonas o i idis, AY953147 ;)3VG(3UPO Pseudomonas s u ze i 6N 1Nsb ,).ps(4UPO Pseudomonas s u ze i 8Nbs 1CN2 ;)C41M(5UPO Pseudomonas s u ze i 5N 10Nbs Nbs132 (OPU 96) bsN12)(6UPO Pseudomonas uomue ensis Pseudomonas mendocina, Z76674 N-179 (OPU 7) Pseudomonas a gen inensis, AY691188 Pseudomonas la escens, U01916 Nbs117 (OPU 97) sbN8)(8UPO Pseudomonas pe ucinogena OPU 9 ( sp.) 20NbsPseudomonas )(01UPO Pseudomonas guineae 1Nbs4N, Pseudomonas anguillisep ica, X99540 Pseudomonas bo bo i, AM114527 N56)(11UPO Pseudomonas amygdali N-193 (OPU 12) Pseudomonas sp. VET-8, EU781734 Pseudomonas b assicacea um, AF100321 Pseudomonas luo escens, AJ308308 Pseudomonas o ien alis, AF064457 N22)(31UPO Pseudomonas pu ida Pseudomonas japonica, AB126621 OPU 14 sp.) 3Nbs(Pseudomonas Azo obac e inelandii, AB175657 N-05 (OPU 15) Pseudomonas balea ica, U26418 uncul u ed bac e ium, GQ979955 OPU 16 ( sp.) 3NbsPseudomonas 10% N clones CN1(N) clones CN2 (Nbs) clones Nbs clones and 454 sequences Figu e 2 A subse o he ee shown in Figu e 1, whe e he genealogical composi ion o he membe s o he amily Pseudomonadaceae is shown. Layou , econs uc ion and colou codes used a e he same as in Figu e 1. Mic obial esponse o polya oma ics M-E Guazza oni e al 126 The ISME Jou nal gene a (Figu e 1 and Supplemen a y Table S2). On he o he hand, membe s o his lineage we e ba ely ep esen ed in Nbs wi h jus se en sequences, being B e undimonas he mos ep esen ed. None o hese gene a we e de ec ed in any o he en ichmen cul u es (Figu e 1). In con as , mos o he alpha- p o eobac e ial clones in CN1 (73%) we e a ilia ed wi h Azospi illum species, ha is, Azospi illum o yzae, whe eas only h ee alphap o eobac e ial sequences (ou o a o al o 108) we e ound in CN2, and only one was a ilia ed wi h Azospi illum (Figu e 5 and Supplemen a y Table S2). Finally, he wo N clones (ou o 214) ep esen ing Be ap o eobac e ia a ilia ed wi h Acido o ax and Ach omobac e spp. (Supplemen a y Table S2). On he o he hand, Nbs sequences we e impo an ly ep esen ed in his lineage wi h 27 sequences (10%), a ilia ed wi h Te a hiobac e and Acido o ax.In his ega d, he pe cen age o Be ap o eobac e ia ound in he en ichmen cul u es was much highe (Figu es 1 and 4); we obse ed an o e ep esen- a ion o sequences a ilia ed wi h he gene a Comamonas and Ach omobac e in CN1 and Ach omobac e in CN2 (Figu es 1 and 5). In addi- ion o Del a-andEpsilon-p o eobac e ia, membe s o Tene icu es, Ve ucomic obia, Fi micu es and Cyanobac e ia we e only de ec ed in samples N and Nbs (Figu es 3 and 4). The abo e da a demons a ed ha he CN1 and CN2 communi ies displayed conside ably di e en phylogene ic s uc u es (Figu es 4 and 5), sha ing only wo OPUs: Be a- and Gamma-p o eobac e ia ep esen a i es o he deni i ying Ach omobac e ( ha is, Ach omobac e spanius) and Azospi illum ( ha is, Azospi illum doebe eine ae) gene a, espec- i ely. Whe eas he i s one was mos abundan in CN2 (29 s 7 sequences), he second was pa icu- la ly en iched in CN1 (35 s 1 sequences) (Supplemen a y Table S2). In addi ion o supplying biosu ac an s, he addi ion o di e en ni a e compounds may ha e s imula ed he g ow h o deni i ying Ach omobac e spp. and P. s u ze i (Song and Wa d, 2003) in he bio-s imula ed com- muni y, whe eas deple ion o ni a e may ha e a ou ed he p esence o he ni ogen- ixing Azos- pi illum species in he non-s imula ed communi y. In addi ion o deni i ica ion, P. s u ze i is well known as naph halene deg ade , which has been isola ed in such hyd oca bon en ichmen s om a wide ange o en i onmen al samples (Rossello ´- Mo a e al., 1994), and was al eady an impo an componen o he o iginal Nbs soil. Howe e , he possibili y ha he selec i e deso p ion and libe a- ion o ecalci an compounds om soils du ing he bio-s imula ion p ocess may ha e key unc ions in shaping he genomes and communi y s uc u es o he associa ed mic oo ganisms should no be uled ou . The indings o p e ious s udies using BTEX biodeg ada ion co-cul u es (Shim e al., 2005) ag ee wi h his hypo hesis. In any case, al hough bac e ia ela ed o Pseudomonas, Ach omobac e Figu e 3 A neighbou -joining ee o non-p o eobac e ial 16S DNA gene sequences om he clone lib a ies es ablished om N, Nbs, CN1 and CN2 communi y DNA. Layou , econs uc ion and colou codes used a e he same as in Figu e 1. Mic obial esponse o polya oma ics M-E Guazza oni e al 127 The ISME Jou nal and Comamonas spp. ha e been widely associa ed wi h PAH deg ada ion in a numbe o con amina ed ecosys ems and mic obial conso ia (Goyal and Zyls a, 1997), he p esence o he Azospi illum species in con amina ed soils and PAH-deg ading bac e ial conso ia has only p e iously been epo ed in a hea ily c eoso e-con amina ed soil (Vin ˜as e al., 2005). This is o special in e es because i is known ha he ecen ly sequenced Azospi illum sp. B510 ha bou s gene se s o deg ada ion pa hways, hough hei unc ions ha e no ye been expe imen ally elucida ed (Kaneko e al., 2010). Due o he clea shi s in communi y composi ion de ec ed among he in es iga ed condi ions, i is impo an o es ablish he oles and deg ada ion capabili ies o he indi idual mic obial membe s o he communi ies o unde s and he o e all unc ion o each communi y and i s membe s. Genomic signa u es associa ed wi h he ae obic deg ada ion o a oma ics DNA isola ed om each mic obial communi y was sequenced using a Roche GS FLX DNA sequence , a Li esequencing SL (Valencia, Spain) which p o- duced 1 471 821 eads (N: 165 791; Nbs: 438 821; CN1: 448 713; CN2: 418 293) wi h an a e age leng h pe ead o 395 bp o CN1 and CN2, 336 bp o N and 531 o Nbs. Acco dingly, a o al o 55.7, 233.3, 177.2 and 165.2 Mbp o aw DNA sequences o N, Nbs, CN1 and CN2 we e ob ained, which we e assembled in o 2.6 Mbp (4335 con igs), 17.9 Mbp (16 032 con igs), 20.0 Mbp (20 809 con igs) and 13.0 Mbp (9915 con igs), espec i ely. CN1 (266) and CN2 (256) con ained a highe numbe o con igs wi h leng hs g ea e han 10 kbp compa ed wi h Nbs (68) and o majo ex en N (only 1); his may be due Figu e 4 Compa ison o bac e ial phylo ypes (cu -o o 497% sequence iden i y) based on he 16 S DNA sequences ex ac ed om N, Nbs, CN1 and CN2 communi y DNA. The pe cen ages o bac e ial phylogene ic lineages de ec ed we e based on OPUs. (a) Pe cen age o 16S DNA sequences dis ibu ed by phyla. (b) Con ibu ion o dominan g oups among Gammap o eobac e ia.(c) Rela i e dis ibu ion o majo bac e ial phylo ypes (based on 16S DNA gene sequences (OPUs)) o soil communi ies CN1 and CN2 a he genus le el. Table 2 S a is ical indexes o he ou samples N Nbs CN1 CN2 Taxa (OPUs) 51 53 13 11 Indi iduals (sequences) 212 261 90 107 Dominance_D 0.13 0.06 0.20 0.30 Shannon_H 2.81 3.32 2.02 1.50 Good’s_G 0.76 0.80 0.86 0.90 Abb e ia ions: CN1, naph halene-en iched communi y de i ed om N soil; CN2, naph halene-en iched communi y de i ed om Nbs soil; OPU, ope a ional phylogene ic uni ; N, non-bio-s imula ed polya oma ic hyd oca bon-con amina ed soil; Nbs, bio-s imula ed polya oma ic hyd oca bon-con amina ed soil. PAST so wa e 1.82b (Hamme e al., 2001) was used o calcula e he s a is ical indices o he bac e ial sequences. The ollowing o mulas we e used. Shannon–Weine index: H ¼S(ni/n ) Ln (ni/n ), whe e ni is he numbe o sequences o a pa icula OTU and n is he o al numbe o sequences. Dominance_D: D ¼S(ni/n )2. Good’s co e age: C¼1(ni/n ), whe e ni is he numbe o OTUs obse ed exac ly once and n is he o al numbe o sequences. Mic obial esponse o polya oma ics M-E Guazza oni e al 128 The ISME Jou nal o he high di e si y o he N sample, which esul ed in a la ge pool o eads ha could no be assembled (Supplemen a y Figu e S7). Fu he in o ma ion ega ding he ob ained me agenome cha ac e is ics is gi en in Supplemen a y Table S3. Wi h a h esh- old o highe han 95% iden i y and an aligned leng h o mo e han 150 bp, 91.7% ( o N), 95.2% ( o Nbs), 92.3% ( o CN1) and 89.9% ( o CN2) o he p edic ed genes we e assigned o pa icula gene a, he analysis o which showed esul s compa able o hose ound in he 16S DNA assign- men s (see Figu e 5 o CN1 and CN2 compa ison). App oxima ely 89% o he p edic ed genes (63 974 in o al) we e assigned o COG p o ein amilies, and 65% we e assigned o KEGG pa hways (Supplemen a y Table S3). Among he 1538 ( o N), 2751 ( o Nbs), 2775 ( o CN1) and 2507 ( o CN2) KEGG o hologs de ec ed, 891 we e sha ed be ween he wo en ichmen cul u es, and 66% o hese we e pu a i ely a ibu ed o Ach omobac e species. We i s calcula ed he o e ep esen a ion o unc ions be ween me agenomes; o ha , we applied a z- es o independen p opo ions p o- posed by Li (2009) o s a is ically analyse he changes o he unc ional ca ego ies be ween sam- ples. I should be no iced ha he compa ison was es ic ed o samples Nbs, CN1 and CN2 because he lowe numbe o py o sequences and COGs in sample N may ha e impac on he compa a i e esul . We ound a a he s able dis ibu ion o he unc ional ca ego ies composi ion be ween he sam- ples wi h signi ican di e en con ibu ion o only 238 ou o 3293 COGs (Supplemen a y Table S4). Among hem, 56/23 did show a signi ican inc ease in he bio-s imula ed soil as compa ed wi h he CN1/CN2 en ichmen s, 58/26 inc eased in CN1 as compa ed wi h Nbs/CN2 and 41/55 we e o e - ep esen ed in CN2 as compa ed wi h Nbs/CN1. O e all, we obse ed ha bo h bio-s imula ed com- muni ies we e pa icula ly en iched in COGs ela ed o ‘Replica ion and epai ’ and ‘T ansla ion’ (29 s 4 dis inc COGs in o al in CN1). O e ep esen a ion o such unc ions is ypical o mic obial commu- ni ies de eloped unde e y dynamic en i onmen al condi ions, such as bio-s imula ion; he addi ion o di e en ni a e compounds may ha e s imula ed a compe i ion be ween as -g owing o ganisms and o ganisms capable o me abolising poly-a oma ics. By con as , i is no ewo hy ha COGs ela ed o ‘T ansc ip ion’ we e mos likely cha ac e is ics o en ichmen cul u es (13 and 7 COG en iched in CN1 and CN2, espec i ely), whe eas only wo (COG0789 and COG1974) we e en iched in Nbs (Supplemen a y Table S4). This sugges s a plausible scena io in which he s ess caused by a oma ic compounds du ing he naph halene cul i a ion led o an en ichmen o genomes con aining ansc ip- ional elemen s ha could be equi ed o s ess endu ance (Domı ´nguez-Cue as e al., 2006) and/o ac i a ion o unc ions equi ed o subs a e up ake. Ten dis inc COGs wi hin he ‘Cell wall, memb ane, en elop biogenesis’ ca ego y we e ound o e ep e- sen ed in CN1, a numbe much highe ha hose ound in Nbs ( ou COGs) and in CN2 ( wo COGs) (Supplemen a y Table S4). In addi ion, CN1 was also pa icula ly en iched in ‘ABC T anspo Sys- ems’ by meaning o genes dis ibu ed in 11 dis inc o e ep esen ed COGs, o which only h ee and wo we e ound in Nbs and CN2, espec i ely. COG0318 ace yl-CoA syn he hase was also associa ed o CN1 communi y; enzymes o he COG0318 ca alyse he o ma ion o ace yl-CoA om ace a e, sugges ing ha ace a e may be a majo end p oduc used o p oduce ace yl-CoA eeding he K ebs pa hway in membe s o CN1 (in ag eemen wi h p o eomic da a ha will be discussed below). By con as , CN2 was pa icula ly en iched in genes coding p o eins Figu e 5 Rela i e abundances and dis ibu ions o gene coding sequences in he CN1 and CN2 communi ies based on axonomic bins o bac e ial 16S DNA gene sequences (OPUs) (blue), axonomic bins o me agenome-de i ed genes encoding p o eins ha could be assigned a axonomic anno a ion ( ed) and axonomic ca ego ies o p o eins ha we e iden i ied in he me ap o eomes (g een). As shown, he me agenome and he 16S DNA analyses yielded cong uen esul s. Fu he , only a mino numbe o bac e ial membe s seemed o be me abolically ac i e in bo h communi ies, by meaning o exp essed p o eins binned o hem. Mic obial esponse o polya oma ics M-E Guazza oni e al 129 The ISME Jou nal con aining Fe–S clus e s, namely COG3210 (la ge exo-p o eins in ol ed in haem u ilisa ion o adhesion), COG1049 (aconi ase B), COG0348 (poly e edoxin) as well as COG4773 (ou e memb ane ecep o o e ic cop ogen and e ic- hodo o ulic acid) (Supplemen a y Table S4), indica ing i on being pa icula ly ele an o CN2 communi y membe s. Taken oge he , he mos no able obse a ions d awn om all hese da a se s a e ha bio-s imula ed communi ies appea o be ex ensi e ese oi s o genes in ol ed in eplica- ion, epai and ansla ion and i on adhesion and u ilisa ion whe eas bac e ial componen s o non-s imula ed communi ies seems o be mos ac i e in cell wall, memb ane and en elop biogen- esis; in addi ion, en ichmen mos likely a ou ed ansc ip ional e en s. The ob ained co e age was su icien o p oduce a u he pa ial heo e ical me abolic econs uc ion (including bo h exclusi e and common capabili ies) o he ae obic a oma ic ca abolic ou es in he in es iga ed communi ies; al hough hese econs uc ions we e incomple e and likely ep esen composi e cell ne wo ks, he in o ma ion ob ained may be su i- cien o achie e a be e unde s anding o how he ou communi ies beha e ega ding hei biodeg a- da ion capabili ies on a genomic scale. To do ha , a p ope unc ional assignmen o he p edic ed genes was pe o med using an in-house da abase con ain- ing p o ein sequences wi h biochemical unc ions shown o be in ol ed in biodeg ada ion ( o de ails see Supplemen a y Ma e ials and me hods). Acco d- ing o his p o ocol, 428 (N: 38; Nbs: 115; CN1: 132; CN2: 143) open- eading- ame agmen s we e iden- i ied as showing close sequence simila i y o genes ha encode enzymes known o be in ol ed in he ae obic me abolism o a oma ics ia di- and i- hyd oxyla ed in e media es and, acco dingly, p e- sump i e unc ions we e assigned. The o e all gene ea u es and p esump i e ca abolic ou es mos likely associa ed o hem, a e shown in Figu e 6 Po en ial ae obic deg ada ion ne wo ks o a oma ics ia di- and i-hyd oxyla ed in e media es in he ou in es iga ed communi ies. The colou code used o he espec i e pa hways is as ollows: black, all samples; g een, N and Nbs (speci ic o soil communi ies); blue, CN1 (N) (speci ic o non bio-s imula ed communi ies]; ed, CN2 (Nbs) (speci ic o bio-s imula ed communi ies). Illus a ions we e c ea ed by ChemD aw g aphic p og amme Chem D aw Ul a 8.0 (Camb idgeSo ; h p://www.camb idgeso .com/) based on subs a e speci ici y o enzymes lis ed in Supplemen a y Table S5, and he co esponding me abolic pa hways we e es ablished based on bibliog aphic eco ds. I should be no iced ha he iden i ica ion o a pa icula ac i i y in CN1 and CN2 implies i s p esence in N and Nbs, espec i ely, al hough hei signa u es we e no iden i ied in he la e mos likely owing o hei highe biodi e si y and low co e age o he me agenome. Acco dingly, hose ac i i ies we e indica ed as CN1 (N) and CN2 (Nbs). Mic obial esponse o polya oma ics M-E Guazza oni e al 130 The ISME Jou nal