Structure of spaces of germs of holomorphic functions
Abstract
Let E be a Frechet (resp. Frechet-Hilbert) space. It is shown that E ∈ (Ω) (resp. E ∈ (DN)) if and only if [H(OE)]∈ (Ω) (resp. [H(OE)]∈ (DN)). Moreover it is also shown that E ∈ (DN) if and only if Hb(E) ∈ (DN). In the nuclear case these results were proved by Meise and Vogt [2].
Full text
Publicacions Matem`atiques, Vol 41 (1997), 467–480. STRUCTURE OF SPACES OF GERMS OF HOLOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS N. Van Khue and P. Thien Danh Abstract Let Ebe a Frechet (resp. Frechet-Hilbert) space. It is shown that E∈(Ω) (resp. E∈(DN)) if and only if [H(OE)]∈(Ω) (resp. [H(OE)]∈(DN)). Moreover it is also shown that E∈(DN) if and only if Hb(E)∈(DN). In the nuclear case these results were proved by Meise and Vogt [2]. 1. Preliminaries 1.1. Let Kbe a compact set in a Frechet space E.ByH(K)we denote the space of germs of holomorphic functions on K. This space is equipped with the inductive topology H(K) = lim ind U↓KH∞(U). Here for each neighborhood Uof K,byH∞(U) we denote the Banach space of bounded holomorphic functions on Uwith the sup-norm fU= sup{|f(z):z∈U}. 1.2. Let Edenote the strong dual space of a Frechet space E.A holomorphic function on Eis said to be of bounded type if it is bounded on every bounded set in E.ByHb(E) we denote the metric locally convex space of entire functions of bounded type on Eequipped with the topology the convergence on bounded sets in E. For more details concerning holomorphic functions on locally convex spaces we refer to the book of Dineen [1].
468 N. Van Khue, P. Thien Danh 1.3. Assume the topology of Eis defined by an increasing fundamental system of seminorms {· k}∞ k=1. For each subset Bof E, define the generalized seminorm · ∗ B:E→[0,+∞], by u∗ B= sup{|u(x)|:x∈B}. Write · ∗ qfor B=Uq={x∈E:xq≤1}. Using this notation define Eto have the property (DN): ∃p∀q∃k, C > 0:2 q≤Ckp. (Ω) : ∀p∃q∀k∃d, C > 0:· ∗1+d q≤C· ∗ k· ∗d p. The properties (DN), (Ω) and the other many properties were introduced and investigated by Vogt (see, for example, [7], [8], etc.). In [8]he has proved that E∈(DN) (resp. E∈(Ω)) if and only if Eis isomorphic to a subspace (a quotient space) of the space Bˆ ⊗πsfor some Banach space B, where sis the space of rapidly decreasing sequences. The following three theorems are proved in the present paper. Theorem 1. Let Ebe a Frechet space. Then the following are equivalent (i) E∈(Ω) (ii) [H(K)]∈(Ω) for some non-empty compact set Kin E. (iii) [H(K)]∈(Ω) for all compact sets Kin E. Theorem 2. Let Ebe a Frechet-Hilbert space. Then E∈(DN)if and only if [H(OE)]∈(DN). Theorem 3. Let Ebe a Frechet space. Then E∈(DN)if and only if Hb(E)∈(DN). The proofs of Theorems 1, 2 and 3 are presented in Sections 2, 3 and 4 respectively.
Structure of spaces of germs of holomorphic functions 469 2. Proof of Theorem 1 2.1. Lemma. Let Ebe a Frechet space. Then E∈(Ω) if and only if Eis isomorphic to a subspace of Bˆ ⊗πsfor some Banach space B. Proof: Suppose Eis isomorphic to a subspace of the space Bˆ ⊗πs where Bis some Banach space. Then E is isomorphic to a quotient space of (Bˆ ⊗πs)∼ =Bˆ ⊗πsand hence E ∈(Ω). This implies that E∈(Ω) since u∗ k= sup{|v(u)|:v∈U00 k⊂E}for u∈E. Conversely assume that E∈(Ω). Consider the canonical resolution 0−→ E−→ k≥1 Ek R −→ k≥1 Ek−→ 0 as constructed by Palamodov [4], where for each k≥1, Ekstands for the Banach space associated to k. Since Eis isomorphic to a quotient space of Bˆ ⊗πswith Bis some Banach space [8], Eis quasinormable. Hence we may assume that every bounded set in Ek+1 can be approximated by a bounded set in Ek+2 under the canonical map Ek+2 →Ek. It follows from [4] that every bounded set in k≥1Ekis the image of a bounded set in k≥1Ekunder R. By modifying the argument in [8] we imply that Eis isomorphic to a quotient space of Bˆ ⊗πsfor which Eis isomorphic to a suspace of (Bˆ ⊗πs)∼ =Bˆ ⊗πs. The following lemma is an immediate consequence of the preceding lemma. 2.2. Lemma. Let Ebe a Frechet space. Then E∈(Ω) if and only if E ∈(Ω). 2.3. Lemma. Let Bbe a Banach space. Then [H(OBˆ ⊗πs)]∈(Ω). Proof: Let {ej}be the canonical basis of swith the dual basis {e∗ j}of s. Since sis nuclear without loss of generality we may assume that
470 N. Van Khue, P. Thien Danh δp= j≥1 e∗ j∗ p+1ejp<1/e for p≥1. For each p≥1, put |f|p+1 = sup 1 p+1n j1,... ,jn≥1 | Pnf(u1⊗ej1,... ,u n⊗ejn)| ×e∗ j1∗ p+1 ...e∗ jn∗ p+1 :u1,... ,u n∈W, n ≥0 for f∈H ∞(conv(W⊗Up)), where Wis the unit ball of Band f(ω)= n≥0 Pnf(ω),ω∈conv(W⊗Up) is the Taylor expansion of fat 0 ∈Bˆ ⊗πs. Since |f|p+1 = sup 1 p+1n j1,... ,jn≥1 Pnfu1⊗ej1 ej1p ,... ,u n⊗ejn ejnp ×e∗ j1∗ p+1 ...ejnp...e∗ j1∗ p+1ej1p:u1,... ,u n∈W, n≥0 ≤Cpfconv(W⊗Up) for f∈H ∞(conv(W⊗Up)), where Cp= sup δp p+1nnn n!:n≥0<∞, it follows that | |p+1 is continuous on H∞(conv(W⊗Up)).
Structure of spaces of germs of holomorphic functions 471 On the other hand, we have fconvW⊗Up+1 p+2 = sup f 1 p+2 k≥1 λkuk⊗vk :uk∈W, vk∈Up+1, k≥1 |λk|≤1 ≤sup n≥0p+1 p+2n k1,... ,kn≥1 |λk1|...|λkn| j1,... ,jn≥11 p+1n ×| Pnf(uk1⊗ej1,... ,u kn⊗ejn)||e∗ j1vk1|...|e∗ jn(vkn)| :uk∈W, vk∈Up+1, k≥1 |λk|≤1 ≤sup n≥0p+1 p+2n k1,... ,kn≥1 |λk1|...|λkn| j1,... ,jn≥11 p+1n ×| Pnf(uk1⊗ej1,... ,u kn⊗ejn)|e∗ j1∗ p+1 ...e∗ jn∗ p+1 :uk∈W, k≥1 |λk|≤1 ≤sup n≥0p+1 p+2n k1,... ,kn≥1 |λk1|...|λkn|f|p+1 : k≥1 |λk|≤1 ≤ n≥0p+1 p+2n |f|p+1. Hence H(OBˆ ⊗πs)∼ =lim ind[H∞(conv(W⊗Up)) : | |p+1]. Given p≥1, choose q≥psuch that ∀k∃C, d > 0:e∗ j∗1+d q≤Ce∗ j∗ ke∗ j∗d p∀j≥1.
472 N. Van Khue, P. Thien Danh Since ∗ q≤∗ p, the above inequality holds for every d≥d. Hence we may assume that Ckpd≤q1+d, then |f|1+d q= sup 1 qn j1,... ,jn≥1 | Pnf(u1⊗ej1,... ,u n⊗ejn)| ×e∗ j1∗ q...e∗ jn∗ q:u1,... ,u n∈W, n ≥0 1+d ≤sup 1 Ckpdn 1+d j1,... ,jn≥1 | Pnf(u1⊗ej1,... ,u n⊗ejn)| ×Cn 1+de∗ j1∗1/1+d k...e∗ jn∗1/1+d k ×e∗ j1∗d/1+d p...e∗ jn∗d/1+d p:u1,... ,u n∈W, n ≥0 1+d ≤sup (1/k)n j1,... ,jn≥1 | Pnf(u1⊗ej1,... ,u n⊗ejn)| ×e∗ j1∗ k...e∗ jn∗ k:u1,... ,u n∈W, n ≥0 ×sup (1/p)n j1,... ,jn≥1 | Pnf(u1⊗ej1,... ,u n⊗ejn)| ×e∗ j1∗ p...e∗ jn∗ p:u1,... ,u n∈W, n ≥0 d =|f|k|f|d p for f∈H(OBˆ ⊗πs). Since Bˆ ⊗πsis quasinormale, according to Mujica [3] there exists a Frechet space Fsuch that F∼ =H(OBˆ ⊗πs). Combining this fact together with the inequality | |1+d≤||k| |d pon H(OBˆ ⊗πs),
Structure of spaces of germs of holomorphic functions 473 by virtue of Lemma 2.2 we obtain [H(OBˆ ⊗πs)]∼ =F has (Ω). Now we are able to prove Theorem 1. (iii) →(ii) is trivial. (ii) →(i). Fix x0∈K. Then the form ϕ→ϕ(x0) defines a left inverse of the canonical map E→H(K). Hence E ∈(Ω), this implies that E∈(Ω). (i) →(iii). Assume that E∈(Ω). By Vogt [5] there exists a continuous linear map Rfrom Bˆ ⊗πsonto Efor some Banach space B. Let {Wk}be a neighbourhood basis of 0 ∈Bˆ ⊗πs. Then {Vk=R(Wk)} forms a neighbourhood basis of 0 ∈E. Lemma 2.3 gives ∀p∃q∃C, d > 0∀f∈H ∞(Wp):f1+d Wq≤CfWkfd Wp. Thus (∗)g1+d Vq≤gVkgd Vp∀g∈H ∞(Vp). Next let Kbe an arbitrary compact set in E. From (∗) we deduce that g1+d K+Vq≤CgK+Vpgd K+Vp∀f∈H ∞(K+Vp). According to Mujica [3] there exists a Frechet space Fverifying F∼ = H(K) since Eis quasinormale, invoke Lemma 2.2 we conclude that [H(K)]∼ =F ∈(Ω). 3. Proof of Theorem 2 3.1. Lemma. Let Ebe a Frechet-Hilbert space with E∈(DN). Then Eis isomorphic to a subspace of the space l2(I)ˆ ⊗πsfor some index set. Proof: Choose an index set Isuch that Eis isomorphic to a subspace of [l2(I)]N. Consider the exact sequence of nuclear Frechet spaces 0→s→s→ω→0 constructed by Vogt [8]. By tensoring this sequence with l2(I) we get the exact sequence of Frechet-Hilbert spaces [8], 0→l2(I)ˆ ⊗πs→l2(I)ˆ ⊗πsq →[l2(I)]N→0
474 N. Van Khue, P. Thien Danh Let ˜ E=q−1(E). Since 0→l2(I)ˆ ⊗πs→ˆ Eq →E→0 is a exact sequence of Frechet-Hilbert spaces in which l2(I)ˆ ⊗πs∈(Ω) and E∈(DN)byVogt[9]qhas a right inverse. Hence Eis isomorphic to subspace of ˜ Eand hence of l2(I)ˆ ⊗πs. 3.2. Lemma. Let Bbe a Banach space. Then [H(OBˆ ⊗πs)]∈(DN). Proof: Let Wdenote the unit ball of B. Write the Taylor expansion of each f∈H(OBˆ ⊗πs)at0∈Bˆ ⊗πs f(ω)= n≥0 Pnf(ω). Formally we have f k≥1 λkuk⊗vk = n≥0 k1,... ,kn≥1 λk1...λ kn × j1,... ,jn≥1 Pnf(uk1⊗ej1,... ,u kn⊗ejn)e∗ j1(vk1)...e ∗ jn(vkn) for ω= k≥1 λkuk⊗vk∈Bˆ ⊗πs. For each p≥1 as in Theorem 1 put |f|p= sup 1 pn j1,... ,jn≥1 | Pnf(u1⊗ej1,... ,u n⊗ejn)|(j1...j n)−p :n≥0,u 1,... ,u n∈W and Fp={f∈H(OBˆ ⊗πs):|f|p<+∞}. Then H(OBˆ ⊗πs)∼ =lim ind pFp.
Structure of spaces of germs of holomorphic functions 475 In order to prove that [H(OBˆ ⊗πs)]∈(DN) we check that (2) ∀q∃k, C > 0:Wq⊂CsW1+1 sWk∀s>0 where for each q≥1 put Wq={f∈Fq:|f|q<1}. Obviously (4) holds for 0 <s≤1. Let s>1. Choose k=q3. We have (3) sup 1 kn j1,... ,jn≥1 | Pnf(u1⊗ej1,... ,u n⊗ejn)|(j1...j n)−k :n≥log s log k q ,u 1,... ,u n∈W + sup 1 kn (j1...jn≥s 1 k−q | Pnf(u1⊗ej1,... ,u n⊗ejn)|(j1...j n)−k :n≥0,u 1,... ,u n∈W ≤sup 1 qn j1,... ,jn≥1 | Pnf(u1⊗ej1,... ,u n⊗ejn)|(j1...j n)−q :n≥0,u 1,... ,u n∈W ≤sup q kn:n≥log s log k q+ sup{(j1...j n)q−k:(j1...j n)≥s1 k−q} ≤2 sfor f∈Wq