scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)
Copyright applies. A non-exclusive, non-transferable and limited
right to use is granted. This document is intended solely for
personal, non-commercial use.
Terms of Use
©American Psychological Association, 2018. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the
authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final
article is available, upon publication, at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000172
This is an accepted manuscript (pre-print version) of an article published in Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the
Arts, 05 April 2018. The “online first” version is available online at:
http://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Faca0000172
Anglada-Tort, M., Steffens, J., & Müllensiefen, D. (2018). Names and titles matter: The impact of linguistic fluency and
the affect heuristic on aesthetic and value judgements of music. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.
https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000172
Anglada-Tort, M., Steffens, J., & Müllensiefen, D.
Names and titles matter: The impact of
linguistic fluency and the affect heuristic
on aesthetic and value judgements of
music
Journal article | Accepted manuscript (Postprint)
This version is available at https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-7282
1
Names and Titles Matter: The Impact of Linguistic Fluency and the Affect Heuristic on
Aesthetic and Value Judgements of Music
Manuel Anglada-Tort and Jochen Steffens
Technische Universität Berlin
Daniel Müllensiefen
Goldsmiths, University of London
Author Note
Manuel Anglada-Tort, Department of Audio Communication, Technische Universität
Berlin; Jochen Steffens, Department of Audio Communication, Technische Universität
Berlin; Daniel Müllensiefen, Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of
London.
Correspondence concerning this paper should be addressed to Manuel Anglada-Tort,
Department of Audio Communication, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
E-mail: m.anglad[email protected]
2
Abstract
It has been shown that titles influence peoples’ evaluation of visual art. However, the
question of whether titles and artist names affect listeners when evaluating music has
not yet been investigated. By using two well-known cognitive heuristics, we
investigated whether names presented with music pieces influenced aesthetic and value
judgements of music. Experiment 1 (N= 48) focused on linguistic fluency. The same
music excerpts were presented with easy-to-pronounce (fluent) and difficult-to-
pronounce (disfluent) names. Experiment 2 (N= 100) studied the affect heuristic. The
same music excerpts were presented with positive (e.g., Kiss), negative (e.g., Suicide),
and neutral (e.g., Window) titles. In both studies, aesthetic and value judgements of
music were significantly influenced by the linguistic manipulation of the names.
Participants in Experiment 1 evaluated the same music more positively when presented
with fluent names compared to disfluent names. In Experiment 2, presenting the music
with negative titles resulted in the lowest judgements. Moreover, music excerpts
presented with neutral and negative titles were remembered significantly more often
than positive titles. Finally, a comparison of the music presented with and without titles
indicated that music excerpts were more liked in the presence of titles than in their
absence. The present research shows different ways in which aesthetic and value
judgements can be influenced by the names presented with music. Results suggest that
like any other human judgement, evaluations of music also rely on heuristic principles
that do not necessarily depend on the aesthetic stimuli themselves.
Keywords: music evaluation, artist name, title, fluency, affect heuristic
Advertisement
3
Names and Titles Matter: The Impact of Linguistic Fluency and the Affect
Heuristic on Aesthetic and Value Judgements of Music
The idea is straightforward, as argued by Danto (1981). Imagine an art
exhibition where four identical plain red paintings are placed next to each other. The
only difference between them is that they are presented with different titles. One
painting is called “The Israelites Crossing the Red Sea”, another “Kierkegaard’s mood”.
There is also a painting titled “Red Square” and another named “Nirvana”. Visitors to
this exhibition would perceive and appreciate these identical paintings in different ways,
influenced by the titles and resulting in different aesthetic judgements. Danto concluded
(1981): “A title is more than a name: frequently it is a direction for interpretation or
reading, which may not always be helpful” (p. 3). The influence of titles on art
appreciation and evaluation has been largely studied in the world of visual arts, but to
the best of our knowledge, there are no studies in the published literature that examined
the extent to which titles presented with music impact aesthetic and value judgements.
Thus, the present study endeavours to make its contribution by investigating the effects
of titles and artist names on the evaluation of music.
Listening to music is a prevalent activity wherein people constantly make
decisions and judgements, the results of which are essential in determining individuals
musical preferences and choice behaviour. Ultimately, these pattern of preferences and
judgements will underlie a person’s musical taste and identity. Researchers have been
able to identify a large number of influences that affect people when listening to and
evaluating music, suggesting three main interconnected factors: the music, the listener,
and the listening context (see Hargreaves, North, & Tarrant, 2006; LeBlanc, 1982, for
theoretical models considering the three factors; see Greasley & Lamont, 2016; North &
Hargreaves, 2008, for research reviews). The vast majority of studies have focused on
4
the music and the listener, examining the effect of musical characteristics (e.g.,
complexity, familiarity, style, tempo, volume) on judgements and preferences (e.g.,
Berlyne, 1971; 1974; North & Hargreaves, 1995, 2000a; Russell, 1986); as well as
individual aspects of the listener that influence preferences for music, including age,
gender, personal values, cognitive styles, and personality (e.g., Bonneville-Roussy,
Rentfrow, Xu, & Potter, 2013; Greenberg, Baron-Cohen, Stillwell, Kosinski, &
Rentfrow, 2015; Lonsdale & North, 2011; North & Hargreaves, 2007; Rentfrow &
Gosling, 2003). Comparatively, less attention has been paid to the listening context,
although there are reasons to believe that they play a crucial role in the processes
involved in listening to music and evaluation (e.g., Egermann et al., 2011; Greasley &
Lamont, 2011;North & Hargreaves, 2000b; North, Hargreaves, & Hargreaves, 2004).
Sloboda (1999) stated that listening to music is ‘intensely situational’ (p. 355),
suggesting that the context wherein people listen to music is crucial to understanding
musical judgements, preferences, and choice behaviour. In support of this view, studies
have identified a number of nonmusical factors, inseparable from the listening situation
in the real-world, that affect people when perceiving and evaluating music. Visual
information is one of the most salient (see Platz & Kopiez, 2012, for a review). There is
evidence that performer’s body movements (e.g., Behne & Wöllner, 2011; Juchniewicz,
2008;), physical attractiveness (Ryan, Costa-Giomi, 2004; Wapnick , Mazza, & Darrow,
2000), appropriateness of dress (Griffiths, 2008; Wapnick et al., 2000), and race and
gender (Davidson & Edgar, 2003; Elliot, 1995) are influential in the evaluation of
music. Similarly, the explicit or contextual information, which frequently accompanies
music, has also been shown to be a relevant factor. Presenting music with different
types of explicit information, such as texts, labels, and subtitles, has a significant impact
on evaluations of music (Anglada-Tort & Müllensiefen, 2017; Duerksen, 1972;
Advertisement
Loading more pages...