scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)
Powder Technology 434 (2024) 119382
Available online 9 January 2024
0032-5910/© 2024 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Review
Analysis of pressure fluctuations in pneumatic conveying systems via
pressure sensors A review
M. Dikty
*
Schwedes +Schulze Schüttguttechnik GmbH, Apensen, Germany
HIGHLIGHTS GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
Analysis methods for pulsations of hor-
izontal conveying lines.
Flow mode influence on pressure
pulsations.
Reasons for emergence of pressure
pulsations.
Influence of turbulence on pressure
pulsations.
ARTICLE INFO
Keywords:
Review
Pneumatic conveying
Pulsation
Fluctuation
Turbulence
ABSTRACT
Bulk solids can usually be transported mechanically, hydraulically or pneumatically. If the choice is made for
pneumatic transport, the necessary quantity of conveying gas and the necessary conveying pressure for the
dimensioning of the pressure generator are decisive for the dimensioning of the system. The lower the pressure
reserves selected, the more sensitively the pneumatic conveying system also reacts to pressure fluctuations. These
can become so strong that the pressure generator fails due to overload. So, what are the reasons for pulsations
and how can they be evaluated? Influences such as the solids loading ratio (SLR), the conveying gas velocity or
the flow pattern were evaluated with a wide variety of criteria. With the aid of the pressure signal and its
evaluation method, conclusions can be drawn about for example the flow condition or the degree of turbulence.
This article shows the results of these research activities so far.
1. Introduction
The sand dune formation in the desert or the tornado that covers the
house roof are natural occurrences of pneumatic transport. Technically,
however, it is used in many applications to transport bulk solids by
means of a conveying gas, usually air, through a pipeline. This takes
place either in suction or pressure mode. Fig. 1 shows the schematic
structure of both systems. Both systems are characterized by a negative
pressure gradient in the direction of flow. The basic operations of a
suction or pressure system are identical:
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: [email protected].
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Powder Technology
journal homepage: www.journals.elsevier.com/powder-technology
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2024.119382
Received 2 October 2023; Received in revised form 27 December 2023; Accepted 2 January 2024
Powder Technology 434 (2024) 119382
2
Feeding of the bulk material into the conveying line.
Transport through the conveying line due to a negative pressure
difference from the material inlet to the outlet.
Separation of the bulk material from the conveying gas at the
receiving point (exceptions are, for example, direct reactor or burner
feeding in pressure conveying, such as coal firing in the power plant
or cement industry).
Pressure generation (overpressure with pressure conveyance, nega-
tive pressure with suction conveyance).
The bulk material is fed into the conveying line in over-pressure
operation by means of a rotary valve [26], pressure vessel [2,5,6],
screw pump [2,58], injector (jet-feeder) [2,5,6,9], flap systems [2,5,6]
or, in the case of exclusively vertical transport, by means of an airlift
[2,5,6]. A suction system can operate without a feeding device. In case
feeding devices are used, then rotary valves of flap systems are installed.
At the receiving point, the bulk material is separated from the transport
gas for further processing. This is done using cyclones and filters. In case
of feeding a burner or a reactor, for example, there is no separation of the
two phases.
Whether a pneumatic conveying system is used or a mechanical one
is preferred depends on many criteria [10]. The decision in favour of
pneumatic conveying is usually made when the conveying route is either
very long or the route between the starting point and receiving point is
characterized by several bends and differences in height. Further criteria
in favour (+) and against () of pneumatic conveying are [2]:
high adaptability of the conveying line to local conditions (+),
environmental-friendly design (no dust emission) (+),
feeding several receiving points with one system by conveying line
diverters (+),
low maintenance for the conveying line (+),
use of inert gas for air-sensitive solids (+),
conveyance of toxic and hazardous bulk materials (+),
broad applicability for a wide variety of solids (+),
direct transport into systems that are under overpressure (+),
low CAPEX (capital expenditure) (+),
less space required (+),
carrying out chemical or physical processes during conveying (+),
comparatively high-power requirement (),
wear of pipelines and feeding devices (),
can be used economically up to a grain size of approx. 10 mm (),
product degradation (),
dust explosion hazard (),
high OPEX (operational expenditure) (),
noise emissions from the pressure generators and, in the case of
coarse and hard particles from the pipeline ().
2. Flow modes
Pressure fluctuations are often linked to the flow mode as referred to
[1117], which exists in the pneumatic conveying line and characterizes
how the bulk material flows through the conveying pipe. The flow mode
Fig. 1. Pressure system (left) / suction system (right) based on [1] with A storage silo, B filter, C feeding device, D receiving silo, E pressure generator, F vacuum
generator, G conveying line diverter.
Fig. 2. Definition of flow modes in relation to [5,81].
M. Dikty
Powder Technology 434 (2024) 119382
3
is not always constant in the whole system. While for example the bulk
material still flows through the pipe in the form of dunes (see definition
below) at the beginning of the conveying line, for example, it can leave
the conveying pipe at the end of the conveying line as a dilute flow (see
definition below), depending on the system configuration. The in this
review used definition of the flow modes in horizontal conveying are
chosen in relation to Weber [81] and Klinzing et al. [5] and graphically
depicted in Fig. 2:
Mode A Dilute flow: No strand or deposit exists. This mode is also called
suspension flow, lean phase flow or homogeneous flow.
Mode B Blowing
dunes/clusters:
On the pipe bottom slides clusters / small dunes form out.
Between the clusters particles of higher velocity flow.
Mode C Strand flow: A strand (nearly even surface), moving or not exists on the
ground of the pipe.
Mode D: - Stratified
flow:
A strand is flowing over a lower strand. The lower strand
can move or not.
Mode E - Dune flow: A dune (uneven surface, geometry in leaning to a sand
dune) is flowing through the pipe. A lower strand (flowing
or not) can exist but must not exist.
Mode F Plug flow: Plugs are flowing with low velocity through the pipe. The
geometry is like a sand dune which fills the complete
vertical pipe cross section. The plugs pick up bulk material
at the front and lose bulk material at the end.
The naming and definition of the flow mode varies from author to
author. Further flow mode overviews are shown e.g., in
[2,35,48,49,8285]. Depending on bulk material, there are other modes
that can occur between mode A and F. Which flow mode occurs depends
on the solid loading ratio (SLR), the velocity and the physical bulk solids
data, like grain size distribution, particle density or sphericity.
In suspension flow (dilute flow), high flow velocities prevail, fine
bulk materials (d
s,50
<100
μ
m) [6,16,68,8689] behave here like coarse
bulk materials / granules. They flow almost evenly distributed over the
pipe cross-section. Irrespective of the air turbulence, the coarse particles
perform a transverse movement in addition to the longitudinal move-
ment, which is caused by the particles impacting each other and the
wall. The transverse movement is essentially determined by the hard-
ness and shape of the particles. In the case of fine-grained particles, on
the other hand, the transverse movement occurs also due to the turbu-
lence of the flow [12]. With fine-grained particles, turbulence damping
of the carrier gas is observed, with coarse-grained ones an increase [14].
The particles are slowed down by the impact on walls as they bounce
back and must be accelerated again. This creates a pressure loss. In the
case of wall impacts, fine particles are also decelerated aerodynamically
in the boundary layer. This is associated with the tendency to form de-
posits on the wall [15]. Particularly, clusters (Mode B) also flow through
the pipeline as the flow approaches the saltation velocity.
When the transport gas velocity is reduced to/under the saltation
velocity, the two-phase flow begins to separate, which is known as
strand flow. Part of the solid slides as a strand on the pipe bottom, while
the other part is transported flying over the strand. The strand is
essentially driven by impacting particles. Compared to coarse-grained
material (d
s,50
>100
μ
m), fine-grained material tends to form strands
even at higher air velocities [12]. If the air velocity is further reduced,
individual strands can push together to form dunes or plugs. Dunes flow
through the conveying line like waves, as shearing forces act on the
strand surface flowing on the ground.
When there is a small SLR, the transition from dune to plug
conveying takes place as conveying happens over a dune situated on the
ground. Dune conveyance is in the case of coarse particles and plug
conveyance in the case of fine-grained bulk materials an instationary
flow mode, where the risk of pipe blockages exists. Closed plugs can
form which, if they are longer, eventually clog the conveying line due to
the wedge action and low gas permeability of the bulk material [16].
When conveying with these conveying conditions, safe pneumatic
Fig. 3. Conveying trial for limestone [21], counter pressure 1.0 bar (abs.), flow mode was inspected via glass pipe 2 m after the feeding point, feeding via rotary
feeder into a DN100 pipe. Total conveying distance =152 m including 5 m vertical and seven bends.
M. Dikty
Powder Technology 434 (2024) 119382
4
conveying can often only be achieved with additional auxiliary equip-
ment, such as an internal aeration pipe to increase the turbulence in the
system [17]. In the case of coarse-grained goods, such wedge actions in
the plug are small, so problem-free conveying can also be achieved with
granules with plug conveying [12].
The flow modes and flow characteristics of fine and coarse bulk
solids listed above lead to more or less strong pressure fluctuations,
which are called pulsations in the following. The previous research re-
sults for pulsations in horizontal conveying pipes are considered in the
following.
3. Reasons for the emergence of pulsations
Pressure fluctuations can be measured in a pneumatic conveying line
with the fluid only and with bulk material. A pressure fluctuation is
called a pulsation and is a rapid (short-term) pressure change in a
pneumatic conveying line at a certain location. The pressure can be
measured during the transition from dilute phase to strand/dune
conveyance, i.e., when the saltation velocity [1820] is undershot, bulk
material sediments out of the gas stream. This bulk material is either
deposited on the pipe bottom or flows unsteadily over the pipe bottom in
the form of strands forming dunes at their upper surface. The flow modes
and flow characteristics of fine and coarse bulk solids listed above lead
to more or less strong pressure pulsations. Regarding pneumatic
conveying systems, pulsations have been examined many times, pri-
marily in order to characterize the transition from dilute phase to
strand/dense phase conveying, but there is no clear definition of the
term.
The pressure fluctuations/pulsations (measured as absolute or gauge
pressure) in horizontal pipe sections are caused by the following effects,
which are mainly listed by [35,49], which can occur independently of
one another:
1. Fluctuating solids flow rate
due to unsteady flow from the feeder (screw feeders, rotary airlocks,
gate valves, venturis)
2. instationary accumulation and acceleration of solids at the feed point
depending on the distance to the saltation velocity
3. air supply
due to the nature of the air supply (e.g., pulsations due to rotating
lobes in roots blower)
pulsations due to by-pass valves and relief valves in the air supply
system
4. Material transport
interaction of particle motion with the turbulence structure
5. Line configuration
presence of bends, diverters
pipe material (roughness)
total pipe length (overall pressure of the system)
inclined pipes and combination of horizontal and vertical pipes
pipe installations like flaps or valves
staggered pipes
6. Collector characteristics
7. System abnormalities
such as leakage or broken components
electrostatic effects
external vibrations
Fig. 3 shows an example of a pressure curve for pneumatic conveying
[21]. The pressure fluctuations are explained using limestone powder
(d
s,50
=27
μ
m, ϱ
s
=1330 kg/m
3
). The Figure shows the initial conveying
gas velocity on the left ordinate. The right ordinate shows the conveying
line back pressure [bar(g)]. Both values are plotted over time. During
the trial, the average mass flow was kept constant at 1.6 t/h.
The conveying tests were started with a high air velocity and thus a
low SLR. Pulsations in the pressure signal at the beginning of the
conveying line are very low, the flow mode can be classified as dilute
flow.
By reducing the speed of the pressure generator, the air volume and
thus the conveying gas velocity can be reduced. The SLR increases as a
result. Visually it could be inspected that due to the reduction in the
conveying velocity, individual particles fall out of the conveying air flow
(saltation velocity is reached) and collect as strands at the bottom of the
conveying pipe, and the two-phase flow separates. The strand continues
to flow at reduced velocity on the pipe bottom, driven by the pressure
difference across the tube element and by the momentum transfer of the
impacting particles of the overflowing dilute phase flow.
It can also be seen that the pressure signal is becoming more rest-
less, i.e., that the pressure fluctuations / pulsations are increasing. This
is caused by the unevenly slipping and unevenly developing strands. A
further reduction in the conveying velocity leads to the area of non-
stationary conveying. Dunes form in places, according to the forma-
tion principles listed above. A look at the pressure curve in this time
window shows that the amplitudes of the pressure fluctuations have
increased but can be controlled for pneumatic conveying with sufficient
pressure reserves at the pressure generator.
Fig. 3 clearly shows the results of the measurements and visual in-
spections of the glass pipe section at the beginning of the conveying line
how the pressure fluctuations increase when the conveying gas velocity
is reduced and/or the solid to air ratio increases during the transition
from dilute phase mode to strand conveyance to dune conveyance.
4. Evaluation methods for assessing pulsations except pressure
measurements
The following sections show the results of the efforts which were
made in the field of pulsations, mainly to analyse the transition of flow
modes, but also to analyse the nature of the pulsation for fine and
grained bulk solids. This review gives a detailed overview of the
researched results, which were obtained by using pressure sensors. Be-
sides pressure sensors other methods were applied successfully which
are reviewed here.
In the 1970th the electrical tomography was developed for the
medical diagnostic [64]. Since the end of the last century, it was used to
analyse two-phase flows. Dyakowski et al. [64] presents a review of the
electrical tomography in 2000 where they show that ECT (electrical
capacitance tomography) systems are suitable for monitoring of dry or
nonconducting systems, whereas ERT (electrical resistance tomography)
systems work best for wet or conducting systems. The advantage of the
ERT is, that it is applicable also to dense phase systems. The results
obtained in applying these tomographic devices to dense phase flow
indicate the complete and dynamic patterns that are present in these
systems [77].
In these century further investigations were made. Jaworski and
Dyakowski [63, 64] investigated flow instabilities referred to slugs and
plugs of granular materials in horizontal and vertical channels using ECT
and particle image velocimetry (PIV). Williams et al. [65] investigated
the transient behaviour of the internal flow structure of material pulses
of fly ash.
In the Shanghai Engineering Research Centre of coal gasification
several investigations were carried out, by analysing the pneumatic
transport of coal, mainly under high pressure. The results of Xu et al.
[66], who analysed the fluctuations of the electrostatic signal of the ECT
in a dense-phase system, shows, that the dominant peak of the power
M. Dikty
Powder Technology 434 (2024) 119382
5
spectrum moves towards higher frequency with the increasing gas su-
perficial velocity. Pu et al. [67] investigated the motion process of slug
flow and demonstrated that the slug moves in wave motions through the
pipe with ECT and PIV. Fu et al. [69] analysed the dynamic behaviour of
the particles through electrostatic sensor array. They found out, that, as
the superficial gas velocity increases, the peak frequency value of the
electrostatic signal increases linearly in dense-phase region, while that
in dilute-phase region is nonlinear. Cong et al. [38] combined the
pressure signal data and the ECT to identify the flow pattern in a hori-
zontal pipe. With an enlarged team Cong [39] analysed the flow sta-
bilities and instabilities over a big range of flow modes using ECT and
the pressure signal.
Decomposition of fly ash density levels within the pipe cross-
sectional were obtained and statistically analysed by Chen et al. [68].
Later they analysed pulses within a flow by the pulse-growth and decay
segments, which represent the superficial fluidisation and deaeration
processes during conveying [23]. Azzopardi et al. used the ECT to
indicate that for the transport of fine coal there were two types of sys-
tematic fluctuations in the time series of mass flow rate and concen-
tration. Azzopardi et al. [41] analysed the fluctuations in dense phase
pneumatic conveying also of pulverized coal.
As mentioned above, in addition to ECT / ERT, PIV was also used to
evaluate pressure or particle pulsations / fluctuations. Rinoshika and his
teams used PIV technology in a variety of studies [5761,7074]. They
measured the particle velocity and concentrations in the acceleration
and fully developed regimes, with and without dune modes. Particle
fluctuation velocity of a horizontal self-excited pneumatic conveying
near the minimum pressure drop or multi-scale particle dynamics of low
air velocity pipe flow were scope of their research. They combined their
analysis for example with wavelet technology, pressure drop measure-
ments or proper orthogonal decomposition (POD). Li et al. [73] used the
PIV to investigate the particle fluctuating intensity during flowing
through bends with coarse polyethylene. Unfortunately, PIV is limited
due to its optical measuring method to low SLR.
The Laser Doppler Anemometer (LDA) or Phase Doppler Anemom-
eter (PDA) is a non-intrusive method to analyse multi-phase flows. Tsuji
and Morikawa [75] used it to analyse the air and solid velocity in a two-
phase flow. They found out, that the particle size has great effect on the
air-flow turbulence. Henthorn et al. [76] investigated the effect on the
pressure drop by the particle characteristics, SLR and Reynolds number.
They also investigated the velocity fluctuations in the single-phase and
multi-phase flow of fine particles.
Hilgraf and Bartusch [44] investigated the mass flow pulsations of a
Geldart group A coal by the evaluation of the load cell signal of the
receiving bin at the end of the conveying line.
Further measuring methods like Positron emission particle tracking
(PEPT), particle tracking velocimeter (PTV), inertial measurement unit
(IMU), or optical fibre probe (OFP), were less used to investigate pul-
sations in horizontal pneumatic conveying systems.
It can be summarized that pulsation / fluctuation measurements are
not only applied to the pressure but also to the air and bulk particles.
There are a variety of measurement methods that have been used in
addition to the pressure measurements considered here. The following
review however concentrates on research related to pressure measure-
ments in horizontal pneumatic conveying systems.
For the pressure measurement calibrated sensors are used. Sensors
Table 1
Summary of all test facility data and bulk solids tested for the research of pulsations in pneumatic conveying systems Test rigs marked with * have vertical downstream
pipe sections included.
Current no.
of test
centre
Reference Pipe
diameter
[mm]
Pipe
lenght
[m]
Vertical
section [m]
Bulk solid d
S,50
[
μ
m]
Particle
density [kg/
m
3
]
Bulk
density
[kg/m
3
]
Geldart-group
of tested
material
SLR [] Feeding
device
1
[22,24,50,53] 53 173 12.3* Fly ash 15 2096 724 C 1250 PV(T)
[24,25] 50 130 12.3* Cement 11 3000 930 C 5170 PV(T)
[36] 50 130 12.3* Fly ash 15 2096 724 C 3485 PV(T)
50 130 12.3* Alumina 78 3300 1050 B 2571 PV(T)
[23] 53 20 Fly ash 19 2500 C 1948 RF
2 [35]
25.4 30 0 Glass bread 450 2340 B 228 SF
25.4 30 0 Glass bread 55 2380 A SF
25.4 30 0 Alumina 400 3420 B SF
25.4 30 0 PVC 137 1180 A SF
3 [37,40]
50.8 25 4.8 PS 3900 1045 735 D 229 RF
50.8 25 4.8 PE 3300 1400 892 D 229 RF
50.8 25 4.8 Polyolefin 4600 870940 D 229 RF
4
[38] 20 34 10.8 Coal dust 36 1382 540 A 230580 PV(B)
[39]
20 34 10.8 Coal dust 35 1532 507 A 60540 PV(B)
50 10 4 Coal dust 35 1532 507 A 99557 PV(B)
5 [41] 36.8 26 8.3 Coal dust 61 1322 537 A 1998 RF
6 [2830,61,78] 76 8 0 PE 3500 1210 D 29 PV(B)
[62] 76 8 0 Polystyrene 2900 1400 D 0.510
7 [48] 40 14 0 plastic 190 1000 A/B 310 EF
40 14 0 plastic 2800 1000 D 19 EF
8 [49,56]
50 30 2.1 Polyester 3000 1400 D 16 RF
50 30 2.1 Glass bread 450 2480 B 14 RF
50 30 2.1 Alumina 450 3750 B 14 RF
9 [34,43,46]
69 168 7.0 Fly ash 30 2300 700 A 27106 TPV(B)
69 148 7.0 White
powder 55 1600 620 A 1256 TPV(B)
10 [45]
51 70 3.0 Fly ash 45 1950 950 A 1652 PV(B)
51 70 3.0 Cement 15 3060 1070 C 40121 PV(B)
63 24 3.0 Fly ash 45 1950 950 A 2341 PV(B)
63 24 3.0 Cement 15 3060 1070 C 1144 PV(B)
11 [51]
56.3 52 Polystyrene 3100 1050 640 D RF
56.3 52 Polyamide 2500 1140 646 D RF
56.3 52 Polystyrene 860 1100 630 A RF
12 [79] 10 45 Coal 36 1350 A 200550 PV(B)
SF: screw feeder, RF: rotary feeder, PV(T): pressure vessel top discharge, PV(B): pressure vessel bottom discharge, TPV(B): twin pressure vessel system with bottom
discharge, EF: electromagnetic feeder.
M. Dikty
Powder Technology 434 (2024) 119382
6
can be calibrated and certified by the supplier [34,40,45,46], or the
calibration must be taken place in the test rig. A procedure for the
calibration is shown by Pan [92] or by Mallick [93]. Behera et al. cali-
brated the pressure sensor using a Barnett dead weight tester. [36].
Sensor with wear resistant flush-mounted membrane, like the
PMC131 from Endress and Hauser are used by [34,45,46], they do not
need a purge air connection. If sensors with for example metal mem-
brane are used, the sensors are located reset in the socket, to avoid wear,
which would influence the measured value of the pressure. Such sensors
must be cleaned regularly, or purge air system were used to keep the
measuring socket clean. [35,36,91] The measuring accuracies of such
sensors are <0.1% of the full-scale value. [34,36,45,46] The sensors
should have a sampling rate that meets the conditions of the Nyquist
theorem [37,40].
5. Research results of pulsation obtained via pressure
measurements in horizontal pneumatic conveying lines
As can be seen above, the term pulsation has a wide range of ap-
plications. Besides e.g., air particle pulsations or bulk material particle
pulsations, the gas pressure in a pneumatic conveying line can also
pulsate. The investigations carried out in this field are presented in more
detail below and compared where possible. By way of introduction,
Table 1 shows the test rig configuration used by the respective authors. It
shows the piping data, the bulk materials used, incl. their bulk material
data (bulk density, average particle diameter, particle density, and
Geldart classification). In addition, the Table shows in which solid
loading ratios and with which feeding device the tests were carried out.
In the following, the analysis methods used so far in the analysis of
horizontal pressure pulsations are presented.
5.1. Transient parameter analysis
At first the research results of the direct use of the pressure signal will
be shown by transients. A transient process (lat. Transire to go by)
describes a non-stationary process. Fig. 4 shows transients applied to a
static pressure signal waveform that was transient/pulsating. The pres-
sure changes over time. However, the pressure-changes differ from each
other.
The following transients are determined from Fig. 4:
Pulse duration t
gr
: It is the time interval between a pressure mini-
mum and the subsequent pressure maximum [22].
Pulse duration t
dec
: It is the time interval between a pressure
maximum and the subsequent pressure minimum [22].
Pulse amplitude A
gr
: It is the pressure difference between a pressure
minimum and the following maximum [22,24,25].
Pulse amplitude A
dec
: It is the pressure difference between a pressure
maximum and the following minimum [22].
The following ratios were formed from the transients including the
fluid density
ρ
F and the superficial gas velocity vF [22,24,25]:
Slope of pulse growth :sgr =Agr
tgr
(1)
Slope of pulse decay :sdec =Adec
tdec
(2)
Pulse slope ratio :sr=sgr
sdec
(3)
Pulse frequency :fp=1
tgr +tdec
(4)
Non dimensional pulse amplitude :sIm =Agr
ρ
Fv2
F
(5)
From the pulse frequency (Eq. (4)), an additional dimensionless
pulse frequency was derived, comparable with the Strouhal number. L
R
is the position of the corresponding pressure sensor in meters from the
feed point [22].
Non dimensional pulse frequency :Sr =fPLR
vF
(6)
Transient analysis of the pressure signal was performed by Behera
et al. [22] and Williams et al. [24,25]. They carried out conveying trials
with fly ash and cement, which are both Geldart group C materials, in a
DN50 conveying pipe with lengths of 130 m and 173 m. Three pressure
sensors were installed and evaluated along the conveying line at 27 m,
90 m and 130 m from the feed point.
The course of the pulse slope ratio was evaluated along the
conveying pipe. A clear course of the pulse slope ratio does not result.
The change of the ratio along the pipe is increasing as well as decreasing,
Fig. 4. Transient chart related to a static pressure signal based on [22].
M. Dikty
Powder Technology 434 (2024) 119382
7
which is explained by Behera et al. [22] with the change of the flow
mode along the pipe and the air holding capacity of the fly ash.
The pulsation frequency tends to decrease along the conveying line
when the conveying starts as dense flow conveying. Like the pulse slope
ratio, the course of the pulsation frequency is influenced by the flow
mode and the air holding capacity according to [22].
The influence of the load on the transients is shown as an example in
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5 shows that the pulse amplitude decreases with increase in the
solids loading ratio. At low solids loading ratios, pulse amplitude is
much higher due to higher pulse growth and vice versa.
Further investigation results are that the pulse slope ratio shows a
decrease with increasing loading. If the SLR increases, the pulse
amplitude difference falls, i.e. the height of the pressure fluctuation is
reduced, which was justified with the aeration behaviour of the bulk
material. The amplitude of the pressure increases along the conveying
line depending on the bulk material and the flow mode, this is due to the
gas expansion along the pipeline [25]. Deposits and dunes which will be
accelerated have to be accelerated to higher velocity. This results into
higher pressure drops and thus high pressure amplitudes. It was
observed that the pulse amplitude decreases when the air mass flow is
increased. The analysis with fly ash and alumina has shown an increase
in pressure fluctuation with an increase in distance from the start of the
pipeline. [24,25], i.e., that the pulsations increases along the conveying
Fig. 5. Variation of pulse amplitude with solids loading ratio [22].
Fig. 6. Wavelet multi-resolution analysis of fluctuating pressure at air velocity of 10 m/s and 0.3 kg/s solids mass flow at locations of x =2 m (left), x =6 m (right)
from feeding point [28].
M. Dikty
Powder Technology 434 (2024) 119382
8
pipeline, influenced only by the pipeline layout, such as bends. One
reason could be that the re-acceleration of deposits along the conveying
line due to the increasing air velocity and thus increasing relative ve-
locity between air and deposit lead to higher acceleration pressure los-
ses, which are measured in the form of pressure pulsations.
The results of the above shown transient analysis of the static pres-
sure fluctuations with a Geldart group C material shows that with the
help of transients, such as the rate of pressure increase, decrease, pulse
time, pulse frequency, conclusions can be drawn about the flow condi-
tion and the aeration condition of the bulk material in the conveying
pipeline. The strength of the pressure pulses appears to depend on the
length of the pipe and the nature of the material. The solid mass flow
rate showed only a small influence on the pulse structures. Bends in-
fluence the results, due to the rope formation. A turbulent flow will get
smoothed due to the bend and the transients can change significant.
5.2. Frequency analysis
Frequency analysis is a tool for studying periodic signals such as
pressure signals, as it allows the various frequency components of a
signal to be identified and quantified to provide information about its
characteristics.
If the Fourier transformation is used, which is a mathematical
method for decomposing a signal into its individual frequency compo-
nents, then a signal will be converted from the time domain to the fre-
quency domain, allowing the various frequency components of the
signal to be identified [90].
If the wavelet analysis will be used for frequency analysis, unlike
Fourier analysis, which decomposes the signal into sine and cosine fre-
quency components, wavelet analysis uses a basis function called a
wavelet to divide the signal into different frequency ranges. Wavelet
analysis can be useful in analysing signals where the frequency ranges
vary or have sharp temporal changes, as it can capture these changes
better than Fourier analysis [22].
5.3. Wavelet transformation / denoising
The origins of wavelet theory come from signal theory. It is a
transformation of the frequency analysis of signals (time-dependent
functions). This transformation was introduced because the classic
methods for frequency analysis, i.e., the Fourier and the windowed
Fourier transformation, have significant disadvantages in terms of signal
theory. A major disadvantage of the Fourier transformation is that it
insufficiently considers the local properties of a signal [26].
In the world of wavelets, the basic functions are called the scaling
function and the mother wavelet. The wavelet function of the contin-
uous wavelet transform is [26,28]:
Wk(
τ
,s) = 1

|s|
+
f(t)
ψ
(t)dt,(7)
where f(t) ist the signal as a function of time (t) with the mother function
/ mother wavelet:
ψ
(t) =
ψ
*(t
τ
s),(8)
where s is the scaling parameter as the reciprocal of the frequency. It is
used to set the width of the window function.
τ
is the time variable. If s
and
τ
are defined in binary and discrete form, then the continuous
wavelet transformation becomes the discrete wavelet transformation.
Using the discrete wavelet transform has the advantages of more accu-
rate and faster analysis. In this case the time variable
τ
becomes a and
the scaling factor s becomes b. N is the length of the filter:
Wd[a,b] = 1b
N1
i=0
f(t)
ψ
[ta
b](9)
The wavelet transformation is also suitable for noise reduction,
called denoising. The thresholding technique is used for this. Hard and
soft thresholding are the most well-known variants. All small detail
coefficients that can be traced back to the noise and fall below a speci-
fied threshold value
ε
are set to 0 and are not considered in the recon-
struction. Very good results can be achieved with this method if the
output signal has been oversampled [27].
Li et al. [28,29,61,62] carried out conveying tests with polyethylene
pellets (d
s,50
=3500
μ
m,
ρ
p
=1210 kg/m
3
) in a conveying pipe with a
diameter of 76 mm. Fig. 6 shows the wavelet decomposition of the
pressure signal down to 10 iteration depths (10 frequency bands). The
illustration on the left shows the breakdown of the conveyance with a
SLR of 2, two meters from the feed point. Li et al. classifies the flow mode
as dilute phase. The 200 Hz frequency (band 9) band shows the most
intense deflections. For Li et al., the 200 Hz band is the characteristic
band for dilute phase. The illustration on the right shows the decom-
position of the conveyance six meters from the feed point. Li et al.
classifies the conveyance as dune flow. The 0.78 Hz frequency in band 1
shows the most dominant deflections. 0.78 Hz corresponds to the fre-
quency with which the dunes pass the pressure sensor. Here, too, the
200 Hz frequency band shows more intense deflections than the other
bands. Li et al. interpret this as the dilute flow above the dunes.
Table 2 shows the summary of the authors [2830,61,62,78] which
indicated the flow pattern by the frequency peaks in the decomposed
frequency bands. The tests were carried out with Geldart group D plastic
granulates.
Mittel et al. [34] used wavelet analysis to assess the static pressure
when conveying Geldart A particles. They presented their results by
means of colour spectra. The colour intensity reflects the energy of the
wavelet coefficients (also called scale coefficient), and the colour bar in
each graph gives the energy values for the different colours. From the
colour spectrum, they can determine that the conveyance at the begin-
ning of the conveying line begins as a dune conveyance and becomes
highly turbulent at the end of the line. They also observed that the
magnitude of the maximum energy increases along the conveying
pipeline, indicating an increase in the amplitude of the pressure fluc-
tuations. Fig. 7 shows an example of the colour spectra for fly ash at a
SLR of 63. At initial locations (i.e., at 6,7 m and 22,6 m from the feed
point, maximum energy is concentrated in the upper region of the plot
and corresponds to high scale coefficients (i.e., scale 50). Since higher
scale coefficients describe the low frequency components of the signal,
therefore it indicates that a signal is composed of large number of low
frequency components, which might be due to reduced turbulence at the
starting of pipe location and in turn indicates dune flow mechanism.
While going from P2 (22,6 m from feed point) to P3 (75,3 m from feed
point), colour intensity is reduced corresponding to higher scales (i.e.,
changes from dark red to light blue) and higher intensity shifts to lower
scales (i.e., scale 20). Thus, parent signals contain comparatively higher
frequency features as compared to the signal obtained at location P1.
With further movement along the pipeline (i.e., from 75,3 m to 115 m
Table 2
Frequency bands of the wavelet analysis of plastic pellets in a swirling gas-solid
flow [2830,61,62,78].
Frequency band Evaluation
0.51 Hz Dune flow [28,29,61,62,78]
1.563.13 Hz Periodic sliding clusters [78]
2080 Hz Heterogeneous suspension flow over dunes [29,61,62]
100110 Hz Dilute flow over dune flow [2830,78]
120 Hz Heterogeneous suspension flow [29,62]
20200 Hz Dilute flow over dune flow [28,29]
200 Hz Only air flow [2830]
M. Dikty
Powder Technology 434 (2024) 119382
9
from feed point) colour intensity almost diminishes at higher scales and
multiple numbers of highly concentrated points are seen at lower scales
(scale 10), which indicate the presence of large number of pressure
fluctuations at different time instants in the signal [34].
5.4. Power spectral density (PSD)
The spectral analysis gives the spectral power density as a result. If it
is applied to the pressure signals p of the pneumatic conveying, the
power of a frequency range in the unit [Pa
2
/Hz] is obtained. Plotted
against the frequency shows the dominant frequencies that are gener-
ated, for example, by the feeding device, the pressure generator or by the
conveyance.
An analogue signal p(t) is digitally sampled and is now dependent on
the number of samples n. The pressure data series are divided into L
segments with a length of N
S
for each window-segment x
i
[n] and rep-
resented as follows [31]:
p[n] = p[n+Ns](10)
with n =1,2,,NSand i =1,2,(L1)
In order to get the lowest variance from a fixed number of samples, it
turns out to be optimal to overlap the window segments by half their
length [32]. Each window-segment xi[n]is multiplied by a window
function w[n][33]:
pwi[n] = pi[n]wi[n](11)
The Fourier transformation of the windowed signal can be expressed
as follows [31]:
Xwi[f] =
NS
n=1
pwi[n]e2
π
fn (12)
The corresponding power spectrum is the square of the absolute
value of the amplitude and is according [31] for each segment i:
Pi
xx(f) = 1
NSU|Xwi[f]|2(13)
where U is a normalization factor related to the energy in the window
function [31]:
U=1
NS
NS
n=1
wi2[n](14)
The average power spectrum is [31]:
Pxx(f) = 1
L
L
i=1
Pi
xx(f)(15)
Fig. 7. Variation of energy distribution in different levels along the length (P1 to P5) for fly ash at a SLR of 63 [34].
Fig. 8. PSD observations for dense and dilute-phase conveying of fly ash [36].
M. Dikty
Powder Technology 434 (2024) 119382
10
The result is a performance with unity [Pa2
Hz ].
The PSD can also be used to distinguish between the periodic and
chaotic nature of the flow process. A wide frequency band in the power
spectrum indicates chaotic signal behaviour, while the periodic nature is
reflected by clear dominant peaks in the frequency band [31].
In 1993, Dhodapkar and Klinzing [35] were the first to apply PSD to
horizontal pneumatic conveyance. They measured the static and dif-
ferential pressure on top and on the bottom of the pipe. According to
Behera [36] the PSD of the signals from top and bottom transmitters is
quite similar, so it is not possible to identify the different flow modes on
the upper and lower sections of a pipeline. According to Cabrejos et al.
[49] both measuring methods provide enough information to identify
the different flow regimes by PSD analysis.
An example of a PSD plot is shown in Fig. 8 for fly ash (d
s,50
=14.91
μ
m,
ρ
p
=2096 kg/m
3
) with ˙
m as SLR and u
a
as the gas velocity. The
upper diagram shows dense phase conveyance, the lower one dilute
phase conveyance. With dense phase conveying, the dominant fre-
quency bands are close to the 0 Hz range. Dilute phase conveying
analysis shows several dominant frequencies of smaller PSD altitude
[36].
That the bulk solid has an influence in the PSD is shown in Fig. 9 for
fly ash and alumina under similar flow conditions of SLR, pressure at the
corresponding pressure sensor and superficial gas velocity. The order of
magnitude of power is higher for alumina than that of fly ash [36]. The
peak value of the PSD is at fly ash near 0 and for alumina between 0.6
and 1.0 for the same conditions (SLR, static pressure, velocity, pipe
diameter).
For the following statements it must be considered that the operating
conditions (piping configuration, bulk solids and flow data) on which
the statements are based differs. The letters of the reference-exponent
show the Geldart-group of the trials, on which the statement is based.
Dhodaqkar [35]
A,B
established the following classification based on
his measurement:
Stratified flow - significant fluctuating components occur near 0 Hz
with lower amplitudes.
Dune - irregular fluctuations <4 Hz frequency.
Air flow only - little pressure fluctuations with very low frequency of
0.05 Hz.
Mittal et al. [34]
A
found out that a single frequency component at
0.1 Hz indicates the periodic nature of the pressure signal, which might
have occurred due to periodic rising of dunes near the pipeline entrance.
[35]
A,B
and Cong et al. [38]
A
analysed, that, if small amounts of bulk
material are added to the pure air flow (small SLR), the power spectrum
is smoothed from over 100 Hz to <2 Hz. If the SLR is further increased,
the power spectrum/pulsations increase again.
The results show, that independent on the Geldart classification the
dominant frequencies shift from the dilute flow (comparatively high
energy content) to the dense phase (comparatively low energy content,
because the particle absorb the energy) towards 0 Hz [34-46
C,A
, 47
D
,
40
D
, 51
D
, 62
D
]. Cong [39]
A
measured, that the peak of the PSD decreases
with increasing pipe diameter. Increasing bulk solids mass flow of coarse
particles increases the peak value of the PSD.
The PSD peak value depends on the flow condition, test rig set up and
bulk solid. For fine bulk solids the peak of the PSD decreases with
increasing air at the beginning of the conveying line. For the same
measuring position, the dominant frequency shows no tendency with
increasing air velocity, because of the influence of the flow pattern.
Bends influences the data of PSD for pressure sensors close before and
behind the bend, due to strand and rope formation. Usually, the fre-
quency shifts in the direction of larger values.
At the beginning of the conveying pipe, the power spectrum is quite
narrow, and a single dominant peak can be clearly seen in the spectrum.
Along the pipeline and towards the flow direction, the spectrum be-
comes broader, and in addition to the single dominant frequency, other
frequency components also appear in the spectrum [34,36]. At the same
time, the power density of the signal increases from the inlet to the end
of the pipeline.
5.5. Statistics
5.5.1. Standard deviation
The best-known measure of the spread of a distribution is the stan-
dard deviation sor its square, the variance s2. It measures the spread of
the data around its mean. The variance of the pressure around its mean is
[42]:
s2=1
n[(p1p)2++(pnp)2](16)
The standard deviation is the root of the variance [42]:
s=
s2
(17)
The standard deviation of the static and/or differential pressure
signal was analysed by Dhodaqkar and Klinzing [35], the teams of Mittal
and Mallick [43,45] and Cabrejos et al. [49]. It could be shown that the
standard deviation is minimum dependent on the bulk solid, pipe
diameter, pipeline configuration (length, bends), flow mode, mass flow
(air, bulk solid) and SLR.
If the experiments from [35,43,45,49] are analysed, it becomes clear
that after a bend measured pressures, have a tendency that the standard
deviation falls in ¾ of the measured data, caused by the strand and rope
formation. Also measuring points 10 m behind the bend shows this
tendency.
In 2014, Mittal and Mallick [43] found that the standard deviation
increases along the conveying line. They disproved this with further
investigations in 2016. [34]
The standard deviation of both absolute and differential signals gives
certain information about the flow regime of the gas-solids flow as it
increases to a maximum value when saltation is approached [49].
Dhodaqkar and Klinzing [35] substantiates this statement for granules to
the effect that the standard deviation only deviates strongly with the
dune flow, whereas it decreases slightly with the stratified flow.
5.5.2. Root mean square (RMS)
In mathematics, the root mean square is a statistical measure of the
Fig. 9. Comparative PSD plot of fly ash and alumina under same flow condi-
tions of conveying [36].
M. Dikty
Powder Technology 434 (2024) 119382
11
magnitude of a varying quantity. The square mean is a mean value in
which large numbers are weighted more heavily than smaller numbers.
In technology, the root mean square is of great importance for periodi-
cally changing quantities. The effective value, or root mean square is
defined as follows [47]:
RMS =
p2
=
1
n
n
i=1
p2
i
=
p2
1+p2
2++p2
n
n
(18)
Compared to the standard deviation, which accounts for the devia-
tion of individual pressure signal from the mean, RMS accounts for the
absolute magnitude of those pressure points as well.
Only Li [28] and Tsuji and Morikawa [48] analysed the pressure
pulsation signal of a horizontal flow with the RMS. Both researchers
used the static pressure signal of trials with plastic granulate. As an
example, in Fig. 10, Li [28] shows the RMS of the conveying line pres-
sure at 3 measuring points along the conveying line with 76 mm inner
diameter for polyethylene pellets (d
s,50
: 3.5 mm,
ρ
p
: 1210 kg/m
3
). There
is a kink point / minimum in the trends at an air velocity of 13 m/s. Both
researchers showed, that for Geldart group D particles, the RMS in-
creases sharply after a kink point with decreasing air velocity. For a
Geldart group A/B material the RMS drops after passing this maximum.
The reason is the change in flow mode from blowing dunes (mode B of
Section 2) to strand flow and stratified flow (mode C and D of Section 2).
5.5.3. Probability density function (PDF)
Distributions describe the frequency of an occurring value x and are
usually shown in so-called histograms (Fig. 11). To do this, classes are
formed, and it is counted how often a value falls into a class. The
probability density function PDF(x) is obtained by normalization of the
continuous approximation of the histogram [27]. The following applies:
+
PDF(x)dx=1(19)
The probability density function describes the probability that a
value x can assume in a distribution.
A so-called core density estimator is used to determine the PDF, since
histograms can give a different impression due to different classifica-
tions. The equation for the core density estimator for approximating the
PDF reads with b the bandwidth of a histogram window and n the
number of samples [27]:
PDF(xi) = 1
nb 
2
π
n
i=1
e1
2(xxi
b)2
(20)
The direct application of the PDF to the pressure signal found little
use. Cabrejos et al. [49] noted about the absolute wall pressure of the
transport of plastic granulate that the PDF changes from unimodal dis-
tribution for dilute flow and pulsating flow into a bimodal distribution
for moving dunes and saltation back to a unimodal distribution for
settled dunes.
Density curves are not only described by their position and scatter,
but also characterized by the symmetry and skewness or kurtosis of the
curve. These parameters always describe the deviation from the normal
distribution. The index of skewness is the moment coefficient g
m
, which
is defined as follows [42]:
gm=m3
s3(21)
With:
m3=1
n
n
i=1(xix)3,s3=(
1
n
n
i=1(xix)2
)3(22a,b)
With:
Fig. 10. RMS of the measured conveying line pressure p from with polyethylene pellets at a mass flow of 0.3 kg/s [28].
Fig. 11. Histogram and density function [42].
M. Dikty
Powder Technology 434 (2024) 119382
12
gm=0 for symmetric distributions,
gm>0 for left-steep (right-skewed) distributions,
gm<0 for right-steep (left skewed) distributions.
Measures for the kurtosis are intended to characterize how heavily or
weakly the central area and related to this the edge areas of the data
are occupied. It should be noted that distributions with the same spread
can have different kurtosis in the middle or different left and right ends
in the edge areas. The kurtosis describes how flat or pointed a distri-
bution is. The kurtosis number of a normal distribution is 3, so Fisher
[42] normalized the kurtosis measure γ with -3 and defined it as
follows:
γ=m4
s43(23)
With:
m4=1
n
n
i=1(xix)4,s4=(
1
n
n
i=1(xix)2
)4(24a,b)
With:
γ=0 for normal distributions,
γ>0 for sharper distributions,
γ<0 for flatter distributions.
Tsuji and Morikawa [48] transported two different plastic pellets of
Geldart group A/B and D. They evaluate their measurements for all
Geldart groups, which were used, for the flow mode A and B (definition
see Section 2). When the fluctuation follows the Gaussian probability
distribution, the skewness and kurtosis factors have the values of 0 and
3, respectively. For bulk solid which is at the boundary of Geldart group
A/B the dune flow has a positive skewness, the strand flow has a
negative skewness. The Geldart group D bulk solid has a positive
skewness in plug flow mode. For the kurtosis, all values are >0 for flow
modes except A and B.
Cabrejos and Klinzing [49] could not determine any clear assignment
of the skewness and kurtosis to the flow patterns when conveying coarse
bulk solids.
5.6. Shannon entropy
The Shannon entropy, also called information entropy, describes the
average amount of information contained in a signal. It comes from
information theory and was developed by Claude E. Shannon in 1948. It
is a measure of the uncertainty or disorder in the system and can be
viewed analogously to entropy in thermodynamics [30]. It is defined as
follows [50]:
Hs=
n
i=1
P(xi)logbP(xi),(25)
where P is the probability of any value of x. The logarithmic base b is
either 2, e or 10. The unit of P is with the b =2 Bit, b =e Nat or b =10
Hart [43].
Various investigations with fine bulk solids were carried out to
determine the Shannon entropy using pressure measurements
[43,45,46,50,53,79]. It turns out that the Shannon entropy depicts the
flow conditions in the conveying line well. The Shannon entropy in-
creases along the horizontal conveying line since the turbulence and
thus particle contacts and particle-wall contacts increase for example
due to increase in velocity. In the area of dense phase conveyance, the
Shannon entropy is lower than in the area of dilute conveyance. Like the
standard deviation, the Shannon entropy also changes after a bend. The
Shannon entropy is also reduced because of the deceleration in the bend
and the resulting reduction in turbulence. If the Shannon Entropy has a
high or low level depends on the turbulence of the flow mode itself. The
influence of the SLR or bulk solid mass flow is also linked to the flow
mode. An increasing SLR or mass flow can increase and decrease the
Shannon entropy. In case the increasing SLR or mass flow changes the
flow mode from homogenous flow to strand flow, then the turbulence
reduces, and the Shannon entropy reduces. If the SLR or mass flow
changes from strand flow to dune flow the turbulence increases which
lead to higher Shannon values.
It should be noted that the absolute value of the Shannon entropy
depends on the amount of data, so attempts are only comparable when
the same number of data is considered.
5.7. Rescaled range analysis / Hurst exponent
The rescaled range analysis was developed in 1951 by British hy-
drologist Harold Edwin Hurst to assess and forecast Nile water levels.
The method should detect stability and near instability [51].
The Hurst exponent is calculated in six steps as follows [52]:
1) Calculation of the mean p
2) Calculation of the linear deviation from the mean:
yi=pip(26)
3) Calculation of the cumulative deviation from the deviation of the
mean:
zi=yi+yi+1(27)
4) Determining the rescaled range:
R=max(zi)min(zi)(28)
5) Calculation of the standard deviation s according to Eq. (17).
6) The Hurst exponent is then defined as follows (with n as the time
window of the measurement interval):
R
SnHxHx=
lnR
S
lnn (29)
The exponent can be divided into 3 areas, which are generally
interpreted as follows:
H
x
<
0.5
Indicates a time series with long-term alternation between high and low
values in adjacent pairs, meaning that a single high value is likely to be
followed by a low value and that the value will then tend to be high again,
with this tendency to switching between high and low values long into the
future.
H
x
=
0.5 Shows that the values will not show any long-term correlation.
H
x
>
0.5
Indicates a time series with long-term positive autocorrelation, which
means both that a high value in the series is likely to be followed by
another high value, and that values will tend to be high as well long into
the future.
Fig. 12. Course of the Hurst exponent depending on the SLR for the pneumatic
transport of fly ash [53].
M. Dikty
Powder Technology 434 (2024) 119382
13
Various authors [37,38,40,45,49,51,53] have applied the rescaled
area analysis to pneumatic conveying by using absolute or differential
pressure signals, with a variety of statements that must be considered
very much in relation to the respective test rig.
The final statements are that in a pneumatic conveying system the
Hurst Exponent decreases along the direction of flow in case the flow
mode changes also [40,43,53,59], what implies that there is an increase
in degree of complexity of flow mechanism (or turbulence), comparable
to the Shannon entropy and that the Hurst exponent increases after
passing a bend [43].
[37,40,46,53] found that the Hurst exponent also increases with
increasing SLR, which is attributed to damping of the flow and thus
reduction of flow turbulence.
As an example, the course of the Hurst exponent is shown using fly
ash conveyance as a function of the SLR, see Fig. 12. Shijo and Behera
[53] transported fly ash (d
s,50
=14.91
μ
m,
ρ
p
=2096 kg/m
3
) through a
173 m long conveying line with a pipe diameter of 53 mm, measuring
the static pressure of the system. It turns out that the Hurst exponent
increases as the SLR increases. That the Hurst exponent increases with
increasing SLR could not be confirmed by all authors, because an
increasing SLR could lead to a change of flow mode, and then also a
change of the Hurst exponent into the opposite direction is possible.
Since not only the SLR influences the Hurst exponent, but also the
change flow mode.
The results from Table 3 and Fig. 13 show that the Hurst exponent is
not a good method to compare conveying systems with each other. The
ranges of the absolute values overlap considerably, so that no clear
assignment of a Hurst exponent to a flow mode is possible. Since a small
Hurst exponent means a large disorder / turbulence, one can recognize
the change of the flow mode in a system based on the Hurst exponent,
which is again comparable with the Shannon entropy.
Fig. 13 show the classification of the results to the flow modes from
Table 3. *Unstable flow is a mode of conveying for coarse particles
where the system is in equilibrium between plug and strand flow [51].
**flow occurs near the pressure drop minimum and is valid for coarse
particles [51].
5.8. Phase space diagram
Phase space diagrams are useful to represent chaotic systems or
deterministic dynamic systems that are extremely sensitive to distur-
bances in their initial conditions. It is possible to construct the 2-dimen-
sional state space plot by means of only one characteristic variable by
using the method of delay coordinates [54]. The values of the variable at
different time delays {0, Δt, 2Δt, , (d 1)Δt} are used as coordinate
values in the embedding space. 2-dimensional phase space diagrams
have been constructed using the method of delays [55], which involves
plotting original time series X(t) versus its delayed versions, i.e. X(t +
τ
),
where
τ
is the delay time to collect one data point.
The normalized pressure at time t and its time derivate (dp/dt) at the
same time, (dp/dt) is defined as follows [40]:
dp
dt =P(t+Δt) P(t)
Δt(30)
The phase space diagram is represented by the normalized value of
pressure drop per unit length at a certain time (t) versus the normalized
value of pressure drop per unit length at (t +dt), where (dt) represented
the time step to collect one data point.
Selection of optimum value of delay time is important for phase
space construction. If the selected time lag is too short, then there are
chances that it would be influenced by noise, on the other hand if too
Table 3
Summary of Hurst exponent evaluation.
Hurst exponent Evaluation
<0.08 Unstable flow [51]*
0.1 0.3 Stable flow** [51]
0.35 0.5 Only gas flow [49]
0.35 1.15 Conveying with bulk solid [49]
<0.40 Only gas flow [37,40]
0.40 0.80 Dilute flow, strand flow, unstable flow* [49]
0.40 0.99 Conveying with bulk solid [50]
0.57 0.92 Conveying with bulk solid [37,40]
0.60 1.15 Flow below saltation velocity [49]
>0.74 Flow left of the minimum point of pressure drop [38]
0.70 0.90 Conveying with bulk solid [38]
0.80 0.91 Conveying with bulk solid [37,40]
0.80 1.10 Dune flow [49]
<0.84 Dilute flow [37,40]
Fig. 13. Classification of flow patterns in horizontal pneumatic conveying using the Hurst exponent of pressure signals.
M. Dikty
Powder Technology 434 (2024) 119382
14
long delay time is chosen, then the phase space attractor would not
reveal the local flow characteristics. The optimum value of delay time is
selected as the first minimum of the mutual information function [52].
Cabrejos [49,56] was in 1994 one of the first, who uses the phase
diagram to judge about a pressure signal. Further investigations were
carried out by [37,40,46,53]. Fig. 14 show as an example phase space
diagrams from [40] for a horizontal pipe section, with air at different gas
velocities. The diagrams shows that the area of the phase space diagram
increases with increasing air velocity, because the turbulence increases.
Independent on the pressure measuring type (static pressure or dif-
ferential pressure) the type of pulsation can be deduced from the geo-
metric position of the data in the phase space diagram. The longer the
horizontal length of the graph, the greater the pressure fluctuations. The
longer the vertical height the faster the pressure fluctuations. An in-
crease in the area means an increase in the turbulence in the conveying
line, caused by e.g., higher fluid velocities or by the transition from
dense flow conveying to dilute phase conveying, as can happen along a
conveying line. However, the geometry of the diagram and its changes
during conveying can only provide qualitative statements on turbulence
and pulsation. It also follows that the influence of the loading allows to
increase or decrease the diagram area, depending on whether the
feeding of bulk material increases or decreases the turbulence. As with
all previous evaluation methods, the measurement after a bend leads to
a change in the direction of turbulence reduction. The phase space plots
indicate that there is no specific range in values for size or area of the
attractor for a dense or dilute mode of flow.
6. Conclusions
The previous scientific work evaluated the pressure signal using
statistical analyses such as PSD, RMS, PDF, standard deviation (SD), root
means square or the skewness or kurtosis. Also, non-statistical methods
like wavelet analysis, transient parameter analysis, Shannon entropy,
rescaled range analysis or the phase space diagram were used. Mainly
qualitative and partially quantitative relationships to flow patterns were
found.
In summary, turbulence is the key factor influencing the analysis
methods. The standard deviation and the transients show the direct
character of the pressure signal. Except for the phase space diagram,
quantitative results are obtained which, however, have little signifi-
cance on their own. In principle, the tendency of the measurement
methods can be shown as a function of the turbulence as follows, if the
turbulence increases, then:
the pressure pulsations increase,
the standard deviation of the pressure signal increases,
the Shannon Entropy increases,
the Hurst Exponent decreases,
the area of the phase space diagram increases,
the dominate frequency of the wavelet analysis increases,
the power spectral density increases.
The turbulence is a function of the relevant process parameters like
for example air velocity, particle velocity, SLR, mass flow, bulk solids
data, pipe diameter and pipe configuration. All these data results into a
plant specific flow mode. The turbulence can be linked to the flow, for
example acc. [80] mode of Section 2 as follows:
High turbulence flow modes are: Dilute flow, cluster flow, unstable
dune flow (mode A, B, E)
Medium and low turbulence flow modes are: Strand flow, stratified
flow (mode C, D), plug flow (mode F)
Fig. 14. Phase space diagram at lower horizontal section (gas only), with different air velocities [40].
M. Dikty
Powder Technology 434 (2024) 119382
15
Table 4 shown the analysed bulk solids classified into the Geldart
group and linked to the analysis method.
However, the results obtained so far still show room for further in-
vestigations, so the influence of the pipe diameter on the pulsations has
hardly been investigated, and the application of the root mean square
and the probability density function to the pressure signal has only been
used to a limited extent. Depending on the Geldart group or the flow
mode, how does the pressure signal behave below the minimum pres-
sure loss in the direction of the minimum conveying velocity? Can an
analysis method be used to detect blockages before they occur? Are
there other transients that describe the flow modes, the minimum
pressure drops, the minimum conveying gas velocity, such as the ratio of
the pressure rise time to the pressure drop time of a pulsation, or the
ratio of the absolute pressure increase to the absolute pressure drop of a
pulsation. What about the absolute pressure in the conveying line, how
does it influence the pressure signal? The higher density results into a
higher impulse onto the particles and it could result in a change in flow
mode. So further investigations must be carried out, to get a clear and
deep understanding of pressure pulsation in horizontal pneumatic
conveying lines.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
M. Dikty: Writing review & editing, Writing original draft,
Validation, Supervision, Project administration, Investigation.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial
interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence
the work reported in this paper.
Data availability
No data was used for the research described in the article.
References
[1] R.D. Marcus, F. Rizk, S.J. Meijers, Solids handling, in: Ullmanns Encyclopedia of
Industrial Chemistry, 7th edition, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2002.
[2] P. Hilgraf, Pneumatische F¨
orderung, Springer, Berlin, 2019.
[3] P.W. Wypych, Effect of rotary valve leakage on pneumatic conveying performance,
Part. Sci. Technol. 26 (2008) 257272.
[4] M. Dikty, A. Akdag, P. Kühn, Successful operation of ceramic rotary valves at
Karsdorf cement plants, Cement International 3 (2019) 4653.
[5] G.E. Klinkzing, F. Rizk, R. Marcus, L.S. Leung, Pneumatic Conveying of Solids,
Springer, 2010.
[6] D. Mills, M.G. Jones, V.K. Agarwal, Handbook of Pneumatic Conveying
Engineering, Marcel Dekker, 2004.
[7] P. Hilgraf, J. Paepcke, Introducing bulk materials into pneumatic conveying lines
with screw feeders, ZKG Int. 7 (1993) 368375.
[8] M. Dikty, Dust pumps according to ATEX 95, Bulk Solids Handl. 26 (6) (2006)
420426.
[9] K. Schneider, Einsatz des Gas-Feststoff-Injektors als Einschleusorgan bei der
pneumatischen F¨
orderung von Schüttgütern, SCHÜTTGUT 2 (2) (1996) 217224.
[10] M. Dikty, P. Schwei, Decision matrix for bulk solids transport, ZKG Int. 7 (60)
(2007) 5666.
[11] M.G. Jones, K.C. Williams, Predicting the mode of flow in pneumatic conveying
systems - a review, Perticuology 6 (2008) 289300.
[12] E. Muschelknautz, Theoretische und experimentelle Untersuchungen über die
Druckverluste pneumatischer F¨
orderleitungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung
des Einflusses von Gutreibung und Gutgewicht, VDI-Forschungsheft 476 (1959).
[13] F. Ebert, Verfahrenstechnik Mainz 8 (2) (1974) 3641.
[14] C.T. Crowe, J.D. Schwarzkopf, M. Sommerfeld, Y. Tsuji, Multiphase Flows with
Droplets and Particles, 2nd edition, CRC Press, 2011.
[15] M. Bohnet, Experimentelle und theoretische Untersuchungen über das Absetzen,
das Aufwirbeln und den Transport feiner Staubteilchen in pneumatischen
F¨
orderleitungen, VDI-Forschungsheft 507 (1965).
[16] E. Muschelknautz, W. Krambrock, Vereinfachte Berechnung horizontaler
pneumatischer F¨
orderleitungen bei hoher Gutbeladung mit feink¨
ornigen
Produkten, Chem.-Ing.-Tech. 41 (21) (1969) 11641172.
[17] K.E. Wirth, Die Grundlagen der pneumatischen F¨
orderung, Chem.-Ing.-Tech. 55 (2)
(1983) 110122.
[18] E. Rabinovich, H. Kalman, Boundary saltation and minimum pressure velocities in
particle-gas systems, Powder Technol. 185 (2008) 6779.
[19] L.M. Gomes, A. Mesquita, On the prediction of pickup and saltation velocities in
pneumatic conveying, Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 31 (1) (2014) 3546.
[20] A. Biobaku, W. Schmitz, R. Naidoo, Evaluation and comparison of saltation
velocity correlations in the context of pulverized fuel transport, Energy 181 (2019)
694708.
[21] M. Dikty, 190014 conveying trials with lime stone, Krauschwitz (2019)
(unpublished, Internal R&D report).
[22] N. Behera, V.K. Agarwal, M.G. Jones, K.C. Williams, Transient parameter analysis
of fluidized dense phase conveying, Powder Technol. 217 (2012) 261268.
[23] W. Chen, K.C. Williams, I. Jabs, M.G. Jones, A qualitative study on the pulsatile
flow phenomenon in a dense fly ash pneumatic conveyor, Particuology 17 (2014)
8191.
[24] C.K. Williams, M.G. Jones, A.A. Cenna, Characterization of the gas pulse frequency,
amplitude and velocity in non-steady dense phase pneumatic conveying of
powders, Particuology 6 (2008) 301306.
[25] K.C. Williams, M.G. Jones, Y. Yadav, Pressure fluctuations in dense phase
pneumatic conveying of powders, Partec (2007).
[26] A.K. Louis, P. Maaß, A. Rieder, Wavelets Theorie und Anwendungen, Teubner
Stuttgart, 1988.
[27] P. Baumm, Beurteilung von Signalverarbeitungsmethoden an pulsierenden
pneumatischen F¨
orderungen, Bachelor-Thesis, Hamburg, 2020.
[28] H. Li, Application of the wavelet multi-resolution analysis to pressure fluctuations
of gas-solid two-phase flow in a horizontal pipe, Powder Technol. 125 (2002)
61730.
[29] H. Li, Y. Tomita, Identification of flow pattern in horizontal pneumatic conveying
by wavelet analysis, in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on
Material Handling, 1997, pp. 584588.
[30] R. Tong, Wavelet analysis of pressure fluctuation in gas-solid two-phase flow in a
horizontal pipe, in: 2011 2nd International Conference on Mechanic Automation
and Control Engineering, 2011, pp. 932935.
[31] M. Werner, Digitale Signalverarbeitung mit MATLAB, Vieweg, 2006.
[32] J. Xiang, Q. Li, Z. Tan, Y. Zhang, Characterization of the flow in a gas-solid
bubbling fluidized bed by pressure fluctuation, Chem. Eng. Sci. 174 (2017)
93103.
[33] W.T. Vetterling, S.A. Teukolsky, W.H. Press, B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C:
The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[34] A. Mittal, S.S. Mallick, P.W. Wypych, An investigation into the transition of flow
mechanism during fluidized dense-phase pneumatic conveying of fine powders,
Part. Sci. Technol. 34 (1) (2016) 2332.
[35] S.V. Dhodapkar, G.E. Klinzing, Pressure fluctuations in pneumatic conveying
systems, Powder Technol. 74 (2) (1993) 179195.
[36] N. Behera, V.K. Agarwal, M. Jones, K.C. Williams, Power spectral density analysis
of pressure fluctuation in pneumatic conveying of powders, Part. Sci. Technol. 33
(5) (2015) 510516.
[37] J.B. Pahk, G.E. Klinzing, Assessing flow regimes from pressure fluctuations in
pneumatic conveying of polymer pellets, Part. Sci. Technol. 26 (2008) 247256.
[38] X. Cong, X. Guo, X. Gong, H. Lu, W. Dong, Experimental research of flow patterns
and pressure signals in horizontal dense phase pneumatic conveying of pulverized
coal, Powder Technol. 208 (2011) 600609.
[39] X. Cong, X. Guo, X. Gong, H. Lu, W. Dong, K. Liu, X. Sun, K. Xie, Flow patterns of
pulverized coal pneumatic conveying and time-series analysis of pressure
fluctuations, Chem. Eng. Sci. 101 (2013) 303314.
[40] J.B. Pahk, Experimental Study of Pressure Fluctuation in Pneumatic Conveying by
Various Methods of Analysis, PhD, Pittsburgh, 2006.
[41] B.J. Azzopardi, K. Jackson, J.P. Robinson, R. Kaji, M. Byars, A. Hunt, Fluctuations
in dense phase pneumatic conveying of pulverized coal measured using electrical
capacitance tomography, Chem. Eng. Sci. 63 (2008) 25482558.
[42] L. Fahrmeir, C. Heumann, R. Künstler, I. Pigeot, G. Tutz, Statistik: Der Weg zur
Datenanalyse, Springer-Verlag, 2016.
[43] A. Mittal, S.S. Mallick, P.W. Wypych, An investigation into flow mode transition
and pressure fluctuations for fluidiuzed dense-phase pneumatic conveying of fine
powders, Particuology 16 (2014) 187195.
[44] P. Hilgraf, J. Bartusch, Fluctuations in the mass flow of solids in pneumatic
conveying lines, Cement International 6 (17) (2019) 3745.
Table 4
Geldart groups which were used for the analysis method acc.
[2225,2830,3443,45,4851,55,56,61,62,78,79].
Analysis method Geldart group
C A B D
Transients X
Wavelet X X
Power spectral density X X X X
Standard deviation X X X X
Root mean square X
Probability density function X X
Shannon Entropy X X
Hurst Exponent X X X X
Phase space diagram X X X X
M. Dikty
Powder Technology 434 (2024) 119382
16
[45] A. Goel, A. Mittal, S.S. Mallick, A. Sharma, Experimental investigation into
transient pressure pulses during pneumatic conveying of fine powders using
Shannon entropy, Particuology 29 (2016) 143153.
[46] A. Mittal, S.S. Mallick, P.W. Wypych, An investigation into pressure fluctuations for
fluidized dense-phase pneumatic transport of fine powders, Powder Technol. 277
(2015) 163170.
[47] J.F. Kenney, Mathematics of Statistics, D. Van Nostrand, 1939.
[48] Y. Tsuji, Y. Morikawa, Flow pattern and pressure fluctuation in air-solid two-phase
flow in a pipe at low air velocities, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 8 (1982) 329341.
[49] F.J. Cabrejos, G.E. Klinzing, Characterization of dilute gas-solids flows using the
rescaled range analysis, Powder Technol. 84 (1995) 139156.
[50] Y. Alkassar, V.K. Agarwal, R.K. Pandey, N. Behera, Experimental study and
Shannon entropy analysis of pressure fluctuations and flow mode transition in
fluidized dense phase pneumatic conveying of fly ash, Particuology 49 (2020)
169178.
[51] G.A. Jama, G.E. Klinzing, F. Rizk, Analysis of unstable behaviour of pneumatic
conveying systems, Part. Sci. Technol. 17 (12) (1999) 4368.
[52] W.L. Li, W.Q. Zhong, B.S. Jin, R. Xiao, T.T. He, Flow regime identification in a
three-phase bubble column based on statistical, Hurst, HilbertHuang transform
and Shannon entropy analysis, Chem. Eng. Sci. 102 (2013) 474485.
[53] J.S. Shijo, N. Behera, Transient parameter analysis of pneumatic conveying of fine
particles for predicting the change of mode of flow, Particuology 32 (2017) 8288.
[54] T.J. Lin, R.C. Juang, Y.C. Chen, C.C. Chen, Prediction of flow transitions in bubble
columns by chaotic time series analysis of pressure fluctuation signals, Chem. Eng.
Sci. 56 (2001) 10571065.
[55] F. Takens, Detecting strange attractors in turbulence, Lect. Notes Math. 898 (1981)
103.
[56] F.J. Cabrejos, Experimental Investigation on the Fully Developed Pipe Flow of
Dilute Gas Solids Suspensions vol. 210, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh,
1994, pp. 157208.
[57] F. Yan, A. Rinoshika, Particle fluctuation velocity of a horizontal self-excited
pneumatic conveying near the minimum pressure drop, Powder Technol. 241
(2013) 115125.
[58] F. Yan, A. Rinoshika, W. Tang, R. Zhu, Experimental analysis on particle
fluctuation velocity in a horizontal air-solid two-phase pipe flow having a dune
model, Part. Sci. Technol. 37 (2) (2019) 182189.
[59] Y. Zheng, A. Rinoshika, Wavelet multi-resolution analysis on particle dynamics in a
horizontal pneumatic conveying, Adv. Powder Technol. 29 (10) (2018)
24042415.
[60] A. Rinoshika, Y. Zheng, F. Yan, Wavelet analysis on particle dynamics in a
horizontal air-solid two-phase pipe flow at low air velocity, Exp. Fluids 52 (2012)
137149.
[61] H. Li, Multiresolution analysis of pressure fluctuation in horizontal swirling flow
pneumatic conveying using wavelets, Adv. Powder Technol. 11 (4) (2000)
423438.
[62] H. Li, Y. Tomita, Characterization of pressure fluctuation in swirling gas-solid two-
phase flow in a horizontal pipe, Adv. Powder Technol. 12 (2) (2001) 169185.
[63] A.J. Jaworski, T. Dyakowski, Investigations of flow instabilities within the dense
pneumatic conveying system, Powder Technol. 125 (2002) 279291.
[64] T. Dyakowski, L.F.C. Jeanmeure, A.J. Jaworski, Applications of electrical
tomography for gassolids and liquidsolids flowsa review, Powder Technol. 112
(2000) 174192.
[65] K.C. Williams, M. Jones, B. Singh, Electrical capacitance tomography of dense-
phase pneumatic conveying of fly ash, in: Bulk Europe Conference, Prague, 2008.
[66] C. Xu, C. Liang, B. Zhou, S. Wang, HHT analysis of electrostatic fluctuation signals
in dense-phase pneumatic conveying of pulverized coal at high pressure, Chem.
Eng. Sci. 65 (2010) 13341344.
[67] W. Pu, C. Thao, Y. Xiong, C. Liang, X. Chen, Numerical simulation on dense phase
pneumatic conveying of pulverized coal in horizontal pipe at high pressure, Chem.
Eng. Sci. 65 (2010) 25002512.
[68] W. Chen, K.C. Williams, M.G. Jones, Decomposition and statistical analysis of bulk
density levels of dense phase fly ash powder flow within a pneumatic conveyor,
Adv. Mater. Res. 239-242 (2011) 33233326.
[69] F. Fu, C. Xu, S. Wang, Flow characterization of high-pressure dense-phase
pneumatic conveying of coal powder using multi-scale signal analysis,
Particuology 36C (2018) 149157.
[70] A. Rinoshika, Y. Zheng, F. Yan, Multi-scale analysis on particle fluctuation velocity
near the minimum pressure drop in a horizontal pneumatic conveying, Chem. Eng.
Sci. 72 (2012) 94107.
[71] Y. Zheng, A. Rinoshika, Multi-scale particle dynamics of low air velocity in a
horizontal self, excited gas-solid two-phase pipe flow, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 53
(2013) 114123.
[72] Y. Zheng, A. Rinoshika, Analysis of particle dynamics in a horizontal pneumatic
conveying of the minimum pressure drop based on POD and wavelet transform,
Powder Technol. 320 (2017) 726738.
[73] X. Li, F. Yan, P. Tu, Y. Chen, R. Zheng Zhu, Particle dynamics analysis in bend in a
horizontal-vertical pneumatic conveying system with oscillatory flow, Adv.
Powder Technol. 32 (2021) 637645.
[74] F. Yan, A. Rinoshika, Application of high-speed PIV and image processing to
measuring particle velocity and concentration in a horizontal pneumatic conveying
with dune model, Powder Technol. 208 (2011) 158165.
[75] Y. Tsuji, Y. Morikawa, LDV measurements in an air-solid two-phase flow in a
horizontal pipe, J. Fluid Mech. 120 (1982) 385409.
[76] K.H. Henthorn, K. Park, J.S. Curtis, Measurement and prediction of pressure drop
in pneumatic conveying: effect of particle characteristics, mass loading, and
Reynolds number, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (2005) 50905098.
[77] T. Dyakowski, S.D. Luke, K.L. Ostrowski, R.A. Williams, On-line monitoring of
dense phase flow using real time dielectric imaging, Powder Technol. 104 (1999)
285295.
[78] A. Rinoshika, M. Takei, Y. Tomita, Y. Saito, K. Horii, Wavelet multi-resolution
cross-correlation analysis of swirling gas-solid flow in a horizontal pipe, Part. Sci.
Technol. 22 (2004) 107118.
[79] C. Liang, C. Zhao, Y. Chen, W. Pu, P. Lu, C. Fan, Flow characteristics and Shannon
entropy analysis of dense-phase pneumatic conveying of pulverized coal with
variable moisture content at high pressure, Chem. Eng. Technol. 30 (7) (2007)
926931.
[80] A. Patankar, A. Makawana, M. Bose, Dune Formation in Horizontal Pneumatic
Conveying System. Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power, Springer, India, 2017.
[81] M. Weber, Str¨
omungsf¨
ordertechnik, Krausskopf-Verlag, 1973.
[82] O. Molerus, Fluid-Feststoff-Str¨
omungen, Springer, 1982.
[83] A. Lippert, Die Staub-Luft-F¨
orderung von Pulvern und Schüttgütern mit hohen
Gutkonzentrationen im Gasstrom, PhD, Leverkusen, 1965.
[84] G. Welschof, Pneumatische F¨
orderung bei großen F¨
ordergutkonzentrationen, VDI-
492/28, Düsseldorf, 1962.
[85] F.A. Zenz, D.F. Othmer, Fluidization and Fluid-Particle Systems, Reinhold
Publishing Corporation, New York, 1960.
[86] N. Behera, V.K. Agarwal, M.G. Jones, K.C. Williams, CFD modelling and analysis of
dense phase pneumatic conveying of fine particles including particle size
distribution, Powder Technol. 244 (2013) 3037.
[87] F.J. Cabrejos, G.E. Klinzing, Minimum conveying velocity in horizontal pneumatic
transport and the pickup and saltation mechanisms of solid particles, Bulk Solids
online 14 (3) (1994) 541550.
[88] K.-E. Wirth, O. Molerus, Stopfgrenze und Druckverlust bei der horizontalen
pneumatischen Str¨
ahnenf¨
orderung in nichtkreisrunden Rohrquerschnitten, Chem.-
Ing.-Techn. 57/6 (1985).
[89] D. Schulze, Pulver und Schüttgüter, 4, Springer-Verlag, Auflage, 2019.
[90] T. Butz, Fouriertransformation für Fußg¨
anger. 7., Aktualisierte Auflage, Vieweg+
Teubner, 2011.
[91] A. Sharma, S.S. Mallick, An investigation into pressure drop through bends in
pneumatic conveying systems, Part. Sci. Technol. 39 (2) (2021) 180191.
[92] R. Pan, Improving Scale-up Procedures for the Design of Pneumatic Conveying
Systems, PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of
Wollongong, 1992.
[93] S.S. Mallick, Modelling of Fluidized Dense-Phase Pneumatic Conveying of Powders,
PhD Thesis, Centre for bulk solids and particulate technologies Faculty of
Engineering, University of Wollongong, 2009.
M. Dikty