micromachines
Article
In-Line Analysis of Diffusion Processes in Micro Channels by
Long Distance Raman Photometric Measurement
Technology—A Proof of Concept Study
Julian Deuerling 1,*,† , Shaun Keck 1,†, Inasya Moelyadi 1, Jens-Uwe Repke 2and Matthias Rädle 1
Citation: Deuerling, J.; Keck, S.;
Moelyadi, I.; Repke, J.-U.; Rädle, M.
In-Line Analysis of Diffusion
Processes in Micro Channels by Long
Distance Raman Photometric
Measurement Technology—A Proof
of Concept Study. Micromachines 2021,
12, 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/
mi12020116
Received: 14 December 2020
Accepted: 19 January 2021
Published: 22 January 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
1Center for Mass Spectrometry and Optical Spectroscopy, Mannheim University of Applied Sciences,
[email protected] (M.R.)
2Process Dynamics and Operation, Technical University of Berlin, Fakultät 3 Prozesswissenschaften,
*Correspondence: [email protected]
† These authors contributed equally to this paper.
Abstract:
This work presents a novel method for the non-invasive, in-line monitoring of mixing
processes in microchannels using the Raman photometric technique. The measuring set-up distin-
guishes itself from other works in this field by utilizing recent state-of-the-art customized photon
multiplier (CPM) detectors, bypassing the use of a spectrometer. This addresses the limiting factor of
integration times by achieving measuring rates of 10 ms. The method was validated using the ternary
system of toluene–water–acetone. The optical measuring system consists of two functional units: the
coaxial Raman probe optimized for excitation at a laser wavelength of 532 nm and the photometric
detector centered around the CPMs. The spot size of the focused laser is a defining factor of the
spatial resolution of the set-up. The depth of focus is measured at approx. 85
µ
m with a spot size of
approx. 45
µ
m, while still maintaining a relatively high numerical aperture of 0.42, the latter of which
is also critical for coaxial detection of inelastically scattered photons. The working distance in this
set-up is 20 mm. The microchannel is a T-junction mixer with a square cross section of 500 by 500
µ
m,
a hydraulic diameter of 500
µ
m and 70 mm channel length. The extraction of acetone from toluene
into water is tracked at an initial concentration of 25% as a function of flow rate and accordingly
residence time. The investigated flow rates ranged from 0.1 mL/min to 0.006 mL/min. The resi-
dence times from the T-junction to the measuring point varies from 1.5 to 25 s. At 0.006 mL/min a
constant acetone concentration of approx. 12.6% was measured, indicating that the mixing process
reached the equilibrium of the system at approx. 12.5%. For prototype benchmarking, comparative
measurements were carried out with a commercially available Raman spectrometer (RXN1, Kaiser
Optical Systems, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Count rates of the spectrophotometer surpassed those of
the spectrometer by at least one order of magnitude at identical target concentrations and optical
power output. The experimental data demonstrate the suitability and potential of the new measuring
system to detect locally and time-resolved concentration profiles in moving fluids while avoiding
external influence.
Keywords:
process engineering; fluid-fluid extraction; Raman effect; photometry; microchannels;
droplets; local concentration measurement; optical measurement
1. Introduction
This article presents a new and fast method for the non-invasive, in-line quality control
of local and time-dependent chemical composition and flow regime in microchannels by
means of inelastic light scattering. All measurements were carried out at the Center for
Mass Spectrometry and Optical Spectroscopy, an interfaculty institution of the University
of Applied Sciences in Mannheim, Germany.
Micromachines 2021,12, 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12020116 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/micromachines
Micromachines 2021,12, 116 2 of 13
Temporally and spatially-resolved optical measurement techniques show great poten-
tial for improving insights into flow characteristics, mixing processes and therefore reaction
monitoring, as well as process control in microchannels [
1
–
3
]. Established methods in the
field of flow monitoring such as common image analysis provide 2-dimensional images,
acquired by reflection or when using microchannels, transmission by means of specifically
adapted and manufactured set-ups. This of course is predicated on both the bottom and
lid of the channel being transparent [1].
There are various approaches to increasing image contrast, e.g., limiting the depth of
field in conventional image analysis, since a narrowly defined detection plane results in a
sharp image. Measuring a transmitted signal only gives information on mean concentration
along the transmission axis. Although complex tomographic 3D-scanning instruments
suppress this effect, increased acquisition times will be the consequence of capturing the
necessarily high number of images [1].
Methods which combine microscopy and image analysis have made the spatial distri-
bution of fluids and the temporal changes thereof accessible. Introducing contrasting agents
into moving phases improves optical contrast. Although fluorescence markers require only
low concentrations, they lack selectivity and possibly influence the fluids’ flow. Measuring
auto-fluorescence is only rarely possible [
1
]. Consequently, the aforementioned techniques
are unable to reliably detect local and temporal shifts in concentrations and are therefore
insufficient for consistent tracking of mixtures, detecting possible occurrences of inho-
mogeneity, deviations from desired reactions and the formation of by-products. To fully
address all of these needs it is paramount to have access to quantitative, molecule-specific
information with a high time and local resolution without imposing external restraints on
the flow regime.
Raman scattering is becoming more frequently used in microfluidics as a means of
detecting target concentrations [
4
–
6
]. However, measuring techniques predominantly rely
on spectrometers, as well as small focal lengths. Additionally, spatial resolution remains
challenging. Consequently, the integration time for acquiring quantifiable spectra often lies
in the range of seconds due to the low yield of the Raman effect. Fletcher et al. investigated
the synthesis of ethyl acetate from ethanol and acetic acid inside a T-shaped channel
using a Jobin Yvon Raman spectrometer and confocal optics, reporting acquisition times
of 5 s per spectrum [
6
]. Rinke et al. monitored the hydrolysis of 2,2-dimethoxypropane
to acetone and methanol in a T-shaped micromixer with a Leica microscope coupled to a
Renishaw Raman spectrometer, with integration times ranging from 10 s to 60 s [
5
]. Gal-Or
et al. presented the acquisition of Raman spectra of cyclohexane and ethyl acetate from
3D printed microfluidic devices by means of time-gated Raman spectrometry through
picosecond-pulsed laser excitation, with measurement times of approximately 6 min per
sample [4].
The presented measuring set-up distinguishes itself by utilizing recent state of the
art customized photon multiplier (CPM) detectors and a long-distance non-contact probe,
thereby addressing the issue of limiting integration times of spectrometers, while achieving
the necessary spatial resolution for application in microchannel geometries. In this work,
we will show that all criteria can be met using application-specific, preselected Stokes-
Raman-Shifted information in a newly designed spectrophotometric Raman set-up.
2. Materials and Methods
The steadily increasing application of microstructured components in process en-
gineering is a clear indicator of the growing importance of these elements in chemical,
pharmaceutical and life sciences. Specific designs include heat exchangers, reactors, static
mixers and others, and thus vary in size and shape [
2
,
7
]. The essential feature in all applica-
tions is the extremely high surface-to-volume ratio, stemming from small linear dimensions,
which is the basis for the majority of advantages over conventional sized chemical process
equipment [
8
]. This property improves selectivity and increases the yield of the chemical
reaction, while also facilitating a more efficient heat transfer [
7
]. Furthermore, the diver-
Micromachines 2021,12, 116 3 of 13
gent behavior of fluids in microscale dimensions in comparison to flow in macroscopic
geometries must be considered. Due to dominating viscous effects, smaller dimensions
result in low Reynolds numbers, which in turn impedes turbulent flow instabilities [
9
].
Accordingly, Newtonian fluids inside microstructured components such as microchannels
will form laminar flow, along with its limiting influences on mass transfer and mixing [5].
All mixing experiments were carried out in an aluminium T-junction microchan-
nel (CN AW 2007 AlCu4PbMgMn). This alloy is specifically designed for milling while
maintaining high tensile strength and is therefore easy to handle. Moreover, there are no
interactions of this material with the fluid chemicals used in the experiments, making it
ideally suited for the investigated fluid system. To reduce reflections and optimize wall
flow the channel surfaces were homogenized by ball peening with spherical glass beads
(40–70
µ
m; DIN 52 900). The microchannel had a square cross section with dimensions
of 500 by 500
µ
m, a hydraulic diameter of 500
µ
m and 70 mm channel length, as shown
in Figure 1.
Micromachines 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 13
tions is the extremely high surface-to-volume ratio, stemming from small linear dimen-
sions, which is the basis for the majority of advantages over conventional sized chemical
process equipment [8]. This property improves selectivity and increases the yield of the
chemical reaction, while also facilitating a more efficient heat transfer [7]. Furthermore,
the divergent behavior of fluids in microscale dimensions in comparison to flow in mac-
roscopic geometries must be considered. Due to dominating viscous effects, smaller di-
mensions result in low Reynolds numbers, which in turn impedes turbulent flow instabil-
ities [9]. Accordingly, Newtonian fluids inside microstructured components such as mi-
crochannels will form laminar flow, along with its limiting influences on mass transfer
and mixing [5].
All mixing experiments were carried out in an aluminium T-junction microchannel
(CN AW 2007 AlCu4PbMgMn). This alloy is specifically designed for milling while main-
taining high tensile strength and is therefore easy to handle. Moreover, there are no inter-
actions of this material with the fluid chemicals used in the experiments, making it ideally
suited for the investigated fluid system. To reduce reflections and optimize wall flow the
channel surfaces were homogenized by ball peening with spherical glass beads (40–70
µm; DIN 52 900). The microchannel had a square cross section with dimensions of 500 by
500 µm, a hydraulic diameter of 500 µm and 70 mm channel length, as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Top down view of the aluminium T-junction microchannel with two inlet and one out-
put channels; square cross section of 500 × 500 µm, hydraulic diameter of 500 µm and 70 mm chan-
nel length (acquired with Keyence VHX-7000, Neu-Isenburg, Germany).
The microchannel was covered with a transparent quartz lid for both visual and laser
access to the flowing phases, as well as detecting inelastic scattered photons. Quartz glass
causes a comparatively low background signal in regard to the common laboratory and
industrial alternative borosilicate. To ensure leak tightness, the lid was fixed to the base
body with a UV adhesive (Norland Optical Adhesive 61 LOT 415, Cranbury, NJ, USA).
The adhesive was applied to the base body near the microchannel edges and was subse-
quently cured by UV light irradiation (Philips BLB F8T5, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
The reason for using this specific microchannel over conventional microfluidic devices
was to verify the measurement system itself, before applying the system to more complex
microchannels.
The optical measuring system for monitoring of mixing consists of two functional
units: the coaxial Raman probe with laser coupling and the spectrophotometric detector.
The complete system is schematically depicted in Figure 2.
Figure 1.
Top down view of the aluminium T-junction microchannel with two inlet and one output
channels; square cross section of 500
×
500
µ
m, hydraulic diameter of 500
µ
m and 70 mm channel
length (acquired with Keyence VHX-7000, Neu-Isenburg, Germany).
The microchannel was covered with a transparent quartz lid for both visual and laser
access to the flowing phases, as well as detecting inelastic scattered photons. Quartz glass
causes a comparatively low background signal in regard to the common laboratory and in-
dustrial alternative borosilicate. To ensure leak tightness, the lid was fixed to the base body
with a UV adhesive (Norland Optical Adhesive 61 LOT 415, Cranbury, NJ, USA). The adhe-
sive was applied to the base body near the microchannel edges and was subsequently cured
by UV light irradiation (Philips BLB F8T5, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The reason for
using this specific microchannel over conventional microfluidic devices was to verify the
measurement system itself, before applying the system to more complex microchannels.
The optical measuring system for monitoring of mixing consists of two functional
units: the coaxial Raman probe with laser coupling and the spectrophotometric detector.
The complete system is schematically depicted in Figure 2.
Micromachines 2021,12, 116 4 of 13
Micromachines 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 13
Figure 2. Optical set-up: laser stage #1–3, probe stage #4–7 and #9–12, microchannel #8, photomet-
ric detection stage #13–18, software #19.
Both the excitation of Raman scattering and the collection of photons was realized by
means of a specially designed non-invasive probe (#7 in Figure 2). Here, a fiber-coupled
laser emitting at 532 nm (gem532, P
max
= 500 mW, Coherent) in continuous wave mode
was focused into the flowing liquid using a dichroic mirror and a long working distance
(20 mm) microscope objective (Mitutoyo Apochromatic Objective, MY20X-804, Kawasaki,
Japan) (#1–8 in Figure 2). The Raman effect was excited instantaneously and spherical
scattering took place. The objective then collected inelastically scattered photons into a
collimated beam, limited by its numerical aperture (NA = 0.42). The increased wavelength
of Stokes-shifted Raman photons enabled passage through the dichroic mirror and block-
ing filter (#6,9,10 in Figure 2; AHF Analysetechnik). Photons were then coupled into a
glass fiber (#12 in Figure 2). The probe was mounted vertically on a three-dimensional
stage (Steinmeyer, MP130-50, Albstadt, Germany) with three linear axes for positioning
during top down measuring. Detection of Stokes-shifted photons was accomplished using
a novel spectrophotometric hybrid combining two key elements, a diffracting optic and a
parallel alignment of glass fibers (#14, 15, 16 in Figure 2). Lenses (#2, 4, 12 and 13 in Figure
2) positioned before and after the glass fibers were used to focus or collimate the light.
Inelastically scattered photons from inside the microchannel were relayed by glass fiber
from the coaxial probe into a collimated beam and projected onto a holographic grating
(grating constant 1800 mm
-1
, Thorlabs, Newton, USA). This type of grating characteristi-
cally has a low occurrence of periodic errors and low stray light; the latter is especially
beneficial in measurements with a critical signal-to-noise ratio such as Raman spectros-
copy. The emergent angle of incident photons from the grating surface was a function of
the wavelength, enabling wavelength specific selection. The originally circular cross sec-
tion of the beam was then focused in a linear shape onto the glass fibers. Fibers transfer-
ring relevant molecular information were then connected to customized photon multipli-
ers (CM92N, Proxivision, Bensheim, Germany, #17 in Figure 2) and the information was
then processed in additional hardware and software steps (#18, 19 in Figure 2). Optical
power was measured at 70% of set power level at the probe head using a PS 19 thermopile
sensor (Coherent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in combination with a FieldMax II. The linearity
of the excitation power was confirmed for the set-up with R
2
= 0.9969, measuring the peak
intensity of acetone at 1710 cm
-1
Raman shift at various power settings.
Figure 2.
Optical set-up: laser stage #1–3, probe stage #4–7 and #9–12, microchannel #8, photometric
detection stage #13–18, software #19.
Both the excitation of Raman scattering and the collection of photons was realized by
means of a specially designed non-invasive probe (#7 in Figure 2). Here, a fiber-coupled
laser emitting at 532 nm (gem532, P
max
= 500 mW, Coherent) in continuous wave mode was
focused into the flowing liquid using a dichroic mirror and a long working distance (20 mm)
microscope objective (Mitutoyo Apochromatic Objective, MY20X-804, Kawasaki, Japan)
(#1–8 in Figure 2). The Raman effect was excited instantaneously and spherical scattering
took place. The objective then collected inelastically scattered photons into a collimated
beam, limited by its numerical aperture (NA = 0.42). The increased wavelength of Stokes-
shifted Raman photons enabled passage through the dichroic mirror and blocking filter
(#6,9,10 in Figure 2; AHF Analysetechnik). Photons were then coupled into a glass fiber
(#12 in Figure 2). The probe was mounted vertically on a three-dimensional stage (Stein-
meyer, MP130-50, Albstadt, Germany) with three linear axes for positioning during top
down measuring. Detection of Stokes-shifted photons was accomplished using a novel
spectrophotometric hybrid combining two key elements, a diffracting optic and a parallel
alignment of glass fibers (#14, 15, 16 in Figure 2). Lenses (#2, 4, 12 and 13
in Figure 2
)
positioned before and after the glass fibers were used to focus or collimate the light. Inelas-
tically scattered photons from inside the microchannel were relayed by glass fiber from the
coaxial probe into a collimated beam and projected onto a holographic grating (grating
constant 1800 mm
−1
, Thorlabs, Newton, USA). This type of grating characteristically has a
low occurrence of periodic errors and low stray light; the latter is especially beneficial in
measurements with a critical signal-to-noise ratio such as Raman spectroscopy. The emer-
gent angle of incident photons from the grating surface was a function of the wavelength,
enabling wavelength specific selection. The originally circular cross section of the beam was
then focused in a linear shape onto the glass fibers. Fibers transferring relevant molecular
information were then connected to customized photon multipliers (CM92N, Proxivision,
Bensheim, Germany, #17 in Figure 2) and the information was then processed in additional
hardware and software steps (#18, 19 in Figure 2). Optical power was measured at 70%
of set power level at the probe head using a PS 19 thermopile sensor (Coherent, Santa
Clara, CA, USA) in combination with a FieldMax II. The linearity of the excitation power
was confirmed for the set-up with R
2
= 0.9969, measuring the peak intensity of acetone at
1710 cm−1Raman shift at various power settings.
Micromachines 2021,12, 116 5 of 13
The spot size and depth of focus of the laser focus are a defining factor of the spatial
resolution of the set-up and these were measured using a Scanning-Split Optical Beam
Profiler (BP209-VIS/M, Thorlabs). Several spot sizes were recorded at defined intervals
along the optical axis. It should be noted that these measurements were done in free space.
Since the refraction index of water and toluene is higher than air, the actual laser spot size
will be smaller, thereby increasing the spatial resolution. The depth of focus was measured
at approx. 85
µ
m with a spot size of approx. 45
µ
m (Figure 3). The working distance in this
set-up was 20 mm and therefore suitable for application in microfluidics.
Micromachines 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 13
The spot size and depth of focus of the laser focus are a defining factor of the spatial
resolution of the set-up and these were measured using a Scanning-Split Optical Beam
Profiler (BP209-VIS/M, Thorlabs). Several spot sizes were recorded at defined intervals
along the optical axis. It should be noted that these measurements were done in free space.
Since the refraction index of water and toluene is higher than air, the actual laser spot size
will be smaller, thereby increasing the spatial resolution. The depth of focus was meas-
ured at approx. 85 µm with a spot size of approx. 45 µm (Figure 3). The working distance
in this set-up was 20 mm and therefore suitable for application in microfluidics.
.
Figure 3. Laser-spot geometry (532 nm laser from coherent exiting probe head (#7 in Figure 2) in
water).
Customized photon multipliers were selected specifically for their applicability in
low light detection. Their key features are extremely low background noise, low light level
detection limits and high dynamic range and gain. In CPMs, sensitivity for large spectral
ranges can be achieved by adapting the cathode material. With a signal amplification of
10
8
, they are among the most sensitive photodetectors. Furthermore, their low noise of <
10 cps (counts per second) is favorable when detecting low-yield Raman photons. The
weak point of photon multipliers in general is their sensitivity to strong light influences
(e.g., daylight, stray light, reflected light). The resulting high number of primary electrons
leads to the destruction of the dynodes. In CPMs, such overexposure is prevented by an
automatic quenching system that closes the entrance slit with a reaction time of 180 ns.
The substance system selected for the experimental series was toluene, acetone and
water. As shown in Figure 4, the different fluids were pumped with a syringe pump into
the microchannel at different flow rates.
Figure 3.
Laser-spot geometry (532 nm laser from coherent exiting probe head (#7 in Figure 2)
in water).
Customized photon multipliers were selected specifically for their applicability in low
light detection. Their key features are extremely low background noise, low light level
detection limits and high dynamic range and gain. In CPMs, sensitivity for large spectral
ranges can be achieved by adapting the cathode material. With a signal amplification of 10
8
,
they are among the most sensitive photodetectors. Furthermore, their low noise of < 10 cps
(counts per second) is favorable when detecting low-yield Raman photons. The weak point
of photon multipliers in general is their sensitivity to strong light influences (e.g., daylight,
stray light, reflected light). The resulting high number of primary electrons leads to the
destruction of the dynodes. In CPMs, such overexposure is prevented by an automatic
quenching system that closes the entrance slit with a reaction time of 180 ns.
The substance system selected for the experimental series was toluene, acetone and
water. As shown in Figure 4, the different fluids were pumped with a syringe pump into
the microchannel at different flow rates.
Micromachines 2021,12, 116 6 of 13
Micromachines 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 13
Figure 4. Fluid set-up: syringe pump #1, syringe with acetone and toluene #2, syringe with water
#3, microchannel #4, waste container with mineral oil as diffusion barrier #5.
The pure substance Raman spectra were measured with a Raman spectrometer
(RXN1, Kaiser Optical Systems, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (see Figure 5).
Figure 5. Raman spectra of toluene, acetone and water recorded with RXN1 spectrometer (Kaiser
Optical Systems). The acetone peak at 1710 cm-1 used for concentration determination is framed.
Spectra are offset by 500 and 1000 counts.
This specific combination was chosen for several reasons. Firstly, the three-phase liq-
uid–liquid extraction of this system is well documented in the literature [10–13]. Secondly,
the spectral peak of acetone at 1710 cm−1 does not interfere with the peaks of toluene or
water, as shown in Figures 5 and 6. Moreover, the detection glass fibers had a spectral
bandwidth of approx. 10 nm, which needed to be considered when aligning the central
wavelengths of fibers. For these reasons the 1710 cm−1 acetone peak was suited for the
detection despite its lower signal intensity, since in the investigated ternary system there
was no overlap of any other peaks in the spectrum while using the spectrophotometric
prototype. The band assignment (see Figure 5) for the substances used in these experi-
ments was as follows in Table 1:
Figure 4.
Fluid set-up: syringe pump #1, syringe with acetone and toluene #2, syringe with water #3, microchannel #4,
waste container with mineral oil as diffusion barrier #5.
The pure substance Raman spectra were measured with a Raman spectrometer (RXN1,
Kaiser Optical Systems, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (see Figure 5).
Micromachines 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 13 of 13
Funding: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, grant number 13FH8I03IA, funded
this research.
Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available on request from the
corresponding author.
Acknowledgments: In this article, the authors draw on contributions from many members of the
CeMOS Research Center. In particular, we would like to thank Stefan Schorz, Steffen Manser and
Julia Siber for providing technology and software. All images and plots without source were created
at the CeMOS institute–Centre for Mass Spectrometry and Optical Spectroscopy, 68163 Mannheim,
Germany.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the
design of the study, in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data, in the writing of the
manu-script or in the decision to publish the results.
References
Figure 5.
Raman spectra of toluene, acetone and water recorded with RXN1 spectrometer (Kaiser Optical Systems).
The acetone peak at 1710 cm−1used for concentration determination is framed. Spectra are offset by 500 and 1000 counts.
This specific combination was chosen for several reasons. Firstly, the three-phase
liquid–liquid extraction of this system is well documented in the literature [
10
–
13
].
Secondly, the spectral peak of acetone at 1710 cm
−1
does not interfere with the peaks
of toluene or water, as shown in Figures 5and 6. Moreover, the detection glass fibers had a
spectral bandwidth of approx. 10 nm, which needed to be considered when aligning the
central wavelengths of fibers. For these reasons the 1710 cm
−1
acetone peak was suited for
the detection despite its lower signal intensity, since in the investigated ternary system there
was no overlap of any other peaks in the spectrum while using the spectrophotometric
prototype. The band assignment (see Figure 5) for the substances used in these experiments
was as follows in Table 1:
Micromachines 2021,12, 116 7 of 13
Micromachines 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 13
Table 1. Raman band assignment.
Water (cm-1). Toluene (cm-1) Acetone (cm-1) Type of Vibration
622, 787, 1005, 1091, 1211 787 C-H deformation
1710 C-O stretching
2921 C-H/C-H2 stretching
3066 C-H/C-H2 stretching
>3200 O-H stretching
Figure 6. Section of Raman spectra of toluene, acetone and water. Spectral bandwidth of detection
fibers are framed with vertical lines (bandwidth of maximum and minimum signal ~300 cm-1
each). Spectra are offset by 500 and 1000 counts.
The spectral bandwidth of individual fibers translated to approx. 300 cm−1 in the cur-
rent set-up. Peripheral fibers showed a slightly reduced signal intensity, stemming from
a curvature in the focal plane. This was compensated for by using the signal intensity of
the highest investigated concentration as a fixed reference for signal processing.
Figure 6 shows a section of each Raman spectrum of the water–toluene–acetone sys-
tem, with the solid and dotted vertical lines indicating the spectral ranges of the target
and reference fibers. The overlap stems from a magnification of the terminal detection
optics. In the investigated ternary system and the selected target range, this circumstance
can be used to improve background signal correction, since the slope of the background
can be better approximated as a photometric count rate due to the spectral proximity of
the reference channel to the target channel. Using the prototype, binary mixtures were
measured ranging from pure acetone to pure water with a minimum acetone concentra-
tion of 1.56% at an optical power output of 300 mW. Each mixture had a pre-selected,
defined concentration and was continuously introduced into the microchannel. Every
concentration consisted of 12000 individual data points. The signal was offset-corrected
for empty conditions at approximately 5 counts. Calibration confirmed the linear behavior
of the Raman effect as a function of concentration, with a Pearson coefficient of R² = 0.9775.
The signal was then scaled to the maximum value of pure acetone, as depicted in the fol-
lowing Figure 7. Scaling facilitated the comparability of different experimental data sets,
which varied between individual experiments while being self-consistent in each experi-
ment.
Figure 6.
Section of Raman spectra of toluene, acetone and water. Spectral bandwidth of detection fibers are framed with
vertical lines (bandwidth of maximum and minimum signal ~300 cm−1each). Spectra are offset by 500 and 1000 counts.
Table 1. Raman band assignment.
Water (cm−1) Toluene (cm−1) Acetone (cm−1)Type of Vibration
622, 787, 1005, 1091, 1211 787 C-H deformation
1710 C-O stretching
2921 C-H/C-H2stretching
3066 C-H/C-H2stretching
>3200 O-H stretching
The spectral bandwidth of individual fibers translated to approx. 300 cm
−1
in the
current set-up. Peripheral fibers showed a slightly reduced signal intensity, stemming from
a curvature in the focal plane. This was compensated for by using the signal intensity of
the highest investigated concentration as a fixed reference for signal processing.
Figure 6shows a section of each Raman spectrum of the water–toluene–acetone
system, with the solid and dotted vertical lines indicating the spectral ranges of the target
and reference fibers. The overlap stems from a magnification of the terminal detection
optics. In the investigated ternary system and the selected target range, this circumstance
can be used to improve background signal correction, since the slope of the background
can be better approximated as a photometric count rate due to the spectral proximity of
the reference channel to the target channel. Using the prototype, binary mixtures were
measured ranging from pure acetone to pure water with a minimum acetone concentration
of 1.56% at an optical power output of 300 mW. Each mixture had a pre-selected, defined
concentration and was continuously introduced into the microchannel. Every concentration
consisted of 12000 individual data points. The signal was offset-corrected for empty
conditions at approximately 5 counts. Calibration confirmed the linear behavior of the
Raman effect as a function of concentration, with a Pearson coefficient of R
2
= 0.9775.
The signal was then scaled to the maximum value of pure acetone, as depicted in the
following
Figure 7
. Scaling facilitated the comparability of different experimental data
sets, which varied between individual experiments while being self-consistent in each
experiment.
Micromachines 2021,12, 116 8 of 13
Micromachines 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 13
Figure 7. Calibration data of acetone signal intensity as a function of concentration measured dur-
ing flow inside the microchannel. Data are scaled to maximum acetone intensity for comparability
of different data sets.
For validation, raw data measured at different flow rates were treated accordingly
and compared to this calibration curve.
3. Results
In a first proof-of-principal experiment, acetone mixed with toluene at a ratio of one
to three was introduced into the microchannel opposite pure water as the extracting sol-
vent. A representative section of 24 s extracted from monitoring of these flow conditions
(flow rate 0.1 mL/min) is depicted in Figure 8.
Figure 8. Measured acetone concentration in toluene droplets alternating with water droplets
(flow rate 0.1 mL/min with 1.5 s time delay after contact of toluene and water).
Figure 7.
Calibration data of acetone signal intensity as a function of concentration measured during flow inside the
microchannel. Data are scaled to maximum acetone intensity for comparability of different data sets.
For validation, raw data measured at different flow rates were treated accordingly
and compared to this calibration curve.
3. Results
In a first proof-of-principal experiment, acetone mixed with toluene at a ratio of one to
three was introduced into the microchannel opposite pure water as the extracting solvent.
A representative section of 24 s extracted from monitoring of these flow conditions (flow
rate 0.1 mL/min) is depicted in Figure 8.
Micromachines 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 13
Figure 7. Calibration data of acetone signal intensity as a function of concentration measured dur-
ing flow inside the microchannel. Data are scaled to maximum acetone intensity for comparability
of different data sets.
For validation, raw data measured at different flow rates were treated accordingly
and compared to this calibration curve.
3. Results
In a first proof-of-principal experiment, acetone mixed with toluene at a ratio of one
to three was introduced into the microchannel opposite pure water as the extracting sol-
vent. A representative section of 24 s extracted from monitoring of these flow conditions
(flow rate 0.1 mL/min) is depicted in Figure 8.
Figure 8. Measured acetone concentration in toluene droplets alternating with water droplets
(flow rate 0.1 mL/min with 1.5 s time delay after contact of toluene and water).
Figure 8. Measured acetone concentration in toluene droplets alternating with water droplets (flow rate 0.1 mL/min with
1.5 s time delay after contact of toluene and water).
After mixing, droplets flowed through the microchannel until they passed the focal
point where the concentration was measured. The signal for these experimental conditions
periodically alternated between a maximum signal of ~24% (acetone concentration in
Micromachines 2021,12, 116 9 of 13
toluene) and 0.9% (acetone concentration in water), both measured at a 10 mm channel
length. The fixed measuring position and the varying flow rates resulted in differing time
delays. The delays increased with the reduction of the flow rate and are given in the
captions of Figures 8–13. Although droplets of toluene and water were distinguishable,
this indicates a negligible mass transfer of acetone from toluene to water at the given flow-
rate. Consequently, to further investigate mass transfer, the flow rate was progressively
decreased, thereby increasing the residence time. At 0.06 mL/min, this resulted in a
maximum concentration of ~21.7% acetone in the toluene phase and ~2.15% in the water
phase (see Figure 9).
Micromachines 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 13
After mixing, droplets flowed through the microchannel until they passed the focal
point where the concentration was measured. The signal for these experimental condi-
tions periodically alternated between a maximum signal of ~24% (acetone concentration
in toluene) and 0.9% (acetone concentration in water), both measured at a 10 mm channel
length. The fixed measuring position and the varying flow rates resulted in differing time
delays. The delays increased with the reduction of the flow rate and are given in the cap-
tions of Figures 8 to 13. Although droplets of toluene and water were distinguishable, this
indicates a negligible mass transfer of acetone from toluene to water at the given flow-
rate. Consequently, to further investigate mass transfer, the flow rate was progressively
decreased, thereby increasing the residence time. At 0.06 mL/min, this resulted in a max-
imum concentration of ~21.7% acetone in the toluene phase and ~2.15% in the water phase
(see Figure 9).
Figure 9. Measured acetone concentration in toluene droplets alternating with water droplets (0.06
mL/min with 2.5 s time delay after contact of toluene and water).
At a flow rate of 0.04 mL/min (see Figure 10) there was slight decrease in the maxi-
mum signal to ~19.15% and an equal increase in the minimum signal to ~3.65%. The time
periods of both the minimum and maximum signals were elongated, as was expected.
Measurement artefacts appeared at some of the droplet boundaries.
Figure 10. Measured acetone concentration in toluene droplets alternating with water droplets
(0.04 mL/min with 3.75 s time delay after contact of toluene and water).
Figure 9.
Measured acetone concentration in toluene droplets alternating with water droplets (0.06 mL/min with 2.5 s time
delay after contact of toluene and water).
At a flow rate of 0.04 mL/min (see Figure 10) there was slight decrease in the maximum
signal to ~19.15% and an equal increase in the minimum signal to ~3.65%. The time
periods of both the minimum and maximum signals were elongated, as was expected.
Measurement artefacts appeared at some of the droplet boundaries.
Micromachines 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 13
After mixing, droplets flowed through the microchannel until they passed the focal
point where the concentration was measured. The signal for these experimental condi-
tions periodically alternated between a maximum signal of ~24% (acetone concentration
in toluene) and 0.9% (acetone concentration in water), both measured at a 10 mm channel
length. The fixed measuring position and the varying flow rates resulted in differing time
delays. The delays increased with the reduction of the flow rate and are given in the cap-
tions of Figures 8 to 13. Although droplets of toluene and water were distinguishable, this
indicates a negligible mass transfer of acetone from toluene to water at the given flow-
rate. Consequently, to further investigate mass transfer, the flow rate was progressively
decreased, thereby increasing the residence time. At 0.06 mL/min, this resulted in a max-
imum concentration of ~21.7% acetone in the toluene phase and ~2.15% in the water phase
(see Figure 9).
Figure 9. Measured acetone concentration in toluene droplets alternating with water droplets (0.06
mL/min with 2.5 s time delay after contact of toluene and water).
At a flow rate of 0.04 mL/min (see Figure 10) there was slight decrease in the maxi-
mum signal to ~19.15% and an equal increase in the minimum signal to ~3.65%. The time
periods of both the minimum and maximum signals were elongated, as was expected.
Measurement artefacts appeared at some of the droplet boundaries.
Figure 10. Measured acetone concentration in toluene droplets alternating with water droplets
(0.04 mL/min with 3.75 s time delay after contact of toluene and water).
Figure 10.
Measured acetone concentration in toluene droplets alternating with water droplets (0.04 mL/min with 3.75 s
time delay after contact of toluene and water).
Micromachines 2021,12, 116 10 of 13
The flow rate was further decreased to 0.02 mL/min. The local acetone concentration is
shown in Figure 11. Here, a continuing decrease in the measured maximum concentration
to ~16%, as well as an increase in the minimum concentration to ~8/.1% was displayed.
In the region of the droplet boundary surface, a mixing concentration of ~12% became
apparent. This mixing concentration seemed to be asymmetrical when comparing the front
to the back of the droplet. In addition, the measurement artefacts were more pronounced.
Micromachines 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 13
The flow rate was further decreased to 0.02 mL/min. The local acetone concentration
is shown in Figure 11. Here, a continuing decrease in the measured maximum concentra-
tion to ~16%, as well as an increase in the minimum concentration to ~8/.1% was dis-
played. In the region of the droplet boundary surface, a mixing concentration of ~12%
became apparent. This mixing concentration seemed to be asymmetrical when comparing
the front to the back of the droplet. In addition, the measurement artefacts were more
pronounced.
Figure 11. Measured acetone concentration in toluene droplets alternating with water phase (0.02
mL/min with a 7.5 s time delay after contact of toluene and water).
A higher degree of extraction of acetone from toluene to water became visible at a
flow rate of 0.014 mL/min (see Figure 12). The maximum and minimum concentration of
acetone in both solvents further converged as it became increasingly difficult to distin-
guish the two phases.
Figure 12. Measured acetone concentration in toluene droplets alternating with water phase (0.014
mL/min with a 10.71 s time delay after contact of toluene and water).
Figure 11.
Measured acetone concentration in toluene droplets alternating with water phase (0.02 mL/min with a 7.5 s time
delay after contact of toluene and water).
A higher degree of extraction of acetone from toluene to water became visible at a
flow rate of 0.014 mL/min (see Figure 12). The maximum and minimum concentration of
acetone in both solvents further converged as it became increasingly difficult to distinguish
the two phases.
Micromachines 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 13
The flow rate was further decreased to 0.02 mL/min. The local acetone concentration
is shown in Figure 11. Here, a continuing decrease in the measured maximum concentra-
tion to ~16%, as well as an increase in the minimum concentration to ~8/.1% was dis-
played. In the region of the droplet boundary surface, a mixing concentration of ~12%
became apparent. This mixing concentration seemed to be asymmetrical when comparing
the front to the back of the droplet. In addition, the measurement artefacts were more
pronounced.
Figure 11. Measured acetone concentration in toluene droplets alternating with water phase (0.02
mL/min with a 7.5 s time delay after contact of toluene and water).
A higher degree of extraction of acetone from toluene to water became visible at a
flow rate of 0.014 mL/min (see Figure 12). The maximum and minimum concentration of
acetone in both solvents further converged as it became increasingly difficult to distin-
guish the two phases.
Figure 12. Measured acetone concentration in toluene droplets alternating with water phase (0.014
mL/min with a 10.71 s time delay after contact of toluene and water).
Figure 12.
Measured acetone concentration in toluene droplets alternating with water phase (0.014 mL/min with a 10.71 s
time delay after contact of toluene and water).
Micromachines 2021,12, 116 11 of 13
Finally, at a flow rate of 0.006 mL/min (see Figure 13) the residence time was suffi-
ciently long for half of the acetone inside toluene droplets to diffuse into the water phase,
resulting in an acetone concentration of approx. 12.6%.
Micromachines 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 13
Finally, at a flow rate of 0.006 mL/min (see Figure 13) the residence time was suffi-
ciently long for half of the acetone inside toluene droplets to diffuse into the water phase,
resulting in an acetone concentration of approx. 12.6%.
Figure 13. Measured acetone concentration in toluene droplets alternating with water phase (0.006
mL/min with a 25 s time delay after contact of toluene and water).
The experimental data are not shown in their entirety for all investigated flow rates,
since there is no additional information to gain from the individual data sets. In the fol-
lowing section, the flow rates and corresponding concentration data are comparatively
summarized in a single diagram for a comprehensive overview (see Discussion, Figure
14).
4. Discussion
The presented prototype for a Raman photometric top-down, long-distance monitor-
ing set-up to detect mixing processes in microchannels was validated using the ternary
system of toluene–water–acetone. The extraction of acetone from toluene at an initial con-
centration of 25% into water was studied as a function of flow rate and accordingly resi-
dence time was studied in a T-junction mixer. The investigated flow rates ranged from 0.1
mL/min to 0.006 mL/min. The corresponding residence times in the microchannel before
reaching the measurement point ranged from 1.5 to 25 s. The chosen spectrophotometric
detection was much faster, compared to the measurement of full spectra. Nevertheless, it
isolated a single Raman peak specific to acetone and a reference section in close proximity
to the spectral target range for signal processing. Toluene, as well as water, showed no
Raman activity in the specified target range. A clear distinction of the immiscible phases
was detectable with flow rates as low as 0.02 mL/min.
Regarding the measurement artefacts (seen in Figure 10, 11 and 12 as outliers), it is
possible for the laser focal point to be refracted at the phase boundaries of the droplet,
presumably enlarging the focal volume by entering the droplet not vertically, but at an
angle. The artefacts only appear on one side of the droplet, as the boundary surface acts
as a diffusing lens and then as a collecting lens when passing through the focal point.
These phenomena can be ignored, as they do not represent the real acetone concentration
and are therefore not included in the comparison data.
The experimental data demonstrate the principle’s feasibility and the potential of the
new measuring system to detect locally and time-resolved concentration profiles in mov-
ing fluids without disturbing flow. The demonstrated results show the progressive trans-
fer of acetone from the toluene phase into the water phase with increasing residence time.
Figure 13.
Measured acetone concentration in toluene droplets alternating with water phase (0.006 mL/min with a 25 s
time delay after contact of toluene and water).
The experimental data are not shown in their entirety for all investigated flow rates,
since there is no additional information to gain from the individual data sets. In the
following section, the flow rates and corresponding concentration data are comparatively
summarized in a single diagram for a comprehensive overview (see Discussion, Figure 14).
Micromachines 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 12 of 13
At 0.006 mL/min a constant acetone concentration of around 12% was measured, indicat-
ing that the mixing process had reached the equilibrium of the system of approx. 12.5%.
Figure 14 shows the average acetone concentration in each phase as a function of flow rate
until droplets were no longer distinguishable through acetone concentration alone. This
trend shows the diffusion of acetone from the toluene droplet phase into the water phase
until it reached an equilibrium state. All average concentration data are limited by the
signal fluctuation, which is accounted for in the standard deviation. Furthermore, the
standard deviation and the quantity of measurement points were used to calculate the
standard error (see Figure 14).
Figure 14. Acetone concentration in toluene droplets and water droplets as a function of the flow
rate.
When comparing the concave and convex droplet boundary surfaces (relative to flow
direction), the data show a higher acetone concentration difference in “front” of the drop-
let (when comparing the two different phases) than in the “back”. This indicates different
acetone mass transfer rates at the two points of the droplet, as seen in Figure 11. For bench-
marking of the developed spectrophotometer, comparative measurements were per-
formed with a commercially available Raman spectrometer (RXN1, Kaiser Optical Sys-
tems). Measured count rates of the prototype surpassed those of the spectrometer by at
least one order of magnitude. Further improvements are under development.
This article focuses on the functional possibilities of the presented Raman photomet-
ric measuring system with a data rate of 100 measurements per second. To date, only the
mean acetone concentration of droplets has been interpreted. Apparently, local distribu-
tion is consistently unequal inside of droplets. Further investigation of detailed transition
processes will follow in a subsequent study. In this regard, next steps will include adapt-
ing the prototype to further optimize spectral resolution and integration time to elucidate
local phenomena in two-phase systems.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, J.D. and S.K.; data curation, I.M.; formal analysis, J.D.
and I.M.; funding acquisition, M.R.; investigation, J.D.; methodology, J.D. and S.K.; project admin-
istration, J.D.; resources, M.R.; supervision, J.-U.R. and M.R.; validation, J.D., S.K. and I.M.; visuali-
zation, J.D. and I.M.; Writing—Original draft, J.D. and S.K.; Writing—Review and editing, J.-U.R.
and M.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Figure 14. Acetone concentration in toluene droplets and water droplets as a function of the flow rate.
Micromachines 2021,12, 116 12 of 13
4. Discussion
The presented prototype for a Raman photometric top-down, long-distance monitor-
ing set-up to detect mixing processes in microchannels was validated using the ternary
system of toluene–water–acetone. The extraction of acetone from toluene at an initial
concentration of 25% into water was studied as a function of flow rate and accordingly
residence time was studied in a T-junction mixer. The investigated flow rates ranged from
0.1 mL/min to 0.006 mL/min. The corresponding residence times in the microchannel be-
fore reaching the measurement point ranged from 1.5 to 25 s. The chosen spectrophotomet-
ric detection was much faster, compared to the measurement of full spectra. Nevertheless,
it isolated a single Raman peak specific to acetone and a reference section in close proximity
to the spectral target range for signal processing. Toluene, as well as water, showed no
Raman activity in the specified target range. A clear distinction of the immiscible phases
was detectable with flow rates as low as 0.02 mL/min.
Regarding the measurement artefacts (seen in Figures 10–12 as outliers), it is possible
for the laser focal point to be refracted at the phase boundaries of the droplet, presumably
enlarging the focal volume by entering the droplet not vertically, but at an angle. The arte-
facts only appear on one side of the droplet, as the boundary surface acts as a diffusing
lens and then as a collecting lens when passing through the focal point. These phenomena
can be ignored, as they do not represent the real acetone concentration and are therefore
not included in the comparison data.
The experimental data demonstrate the principle’s feasibility and the potential of
the new measuring system to detect locally and time-resolved concentration profiles in
moving fluids without disturbing flow. The demonstrated results show the progressive
transfer of acetone from the toluene phase into the water phase with increasing residence
time. At 0.006 mL/min a constant acetone concentration of around 12% was measured,
indicating that the mixing process had reached the equilibrium of the system of approx.
12.5%. Figure 14 shows the average acetone concentration in each phase as a function
of flow rate until droplets were no longer distinguishable through acetone concentration
alone. This trend shows the diffusion of acetone from the toluene droplet phase into the
water phase until it reached an equilibrium state. All average concentration data are limited
by the signal fluctuation, which is accounted for in the standard deviation. Furthermore,
the standard deviation and the quantity of measurement points were used to calculate the
standard error (see Figure 14).
When comparing the concave and convex droplet boundary surfaces (relative to
flow direction), the data show a higher acetone concentration difference in “front” of the
droplet (when comparing the two different phases) than in the “back”. This indicates
different acetone mass transfer rates at the two points of the droplet, as seen
in Figure 11
.
For benchmarking of the developed spectrophotometer, comparative measurements were
performed with a commercially available Raman spectrometer (RXN1, Kaiser Optical
Systems). Measured count rates of the prototype surpassed those of the spectrometer by at
least one order of magnitude. Further improvements are under development.
This article focuses on the functional possibilities of the presented Raman photometric
measuring system with a data rate of 100 measurements per second. To date, only the
mean acetone concentration of droplets has been interpreted. Apparently, local distribution
is consistently unequal inside of droplets. Further investigation of detailed transition
processes will follow in a subsequent study. In this regard, next steps will include adapting
the prototype to further optimize spectral resolution and integration time to elucidate local
phenomena in two-phase systems.
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization, J.D. and S.K.; data curation, I.M.; formal analysis, J.D. and
I.M.; funding acquisition, M.R.; investigation, J.D.; methodology, J.D. and S.K.; project administration,
J.D.; resources, M.R.; supervision, J.-U.R. and M.R.; validation, J.D., S.K. and I.M.; visualization,
J.D. and I.M.; Writing—Original draft, J.D. and S.K.; Writing—Review and editing, J.-U.R. and M.R.
All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Micromachines 2021,12, 116 13 of 13
Funding:
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, grant number 13FH8I03IA, funded
this research.
Data Availability Statement:
The data presented in this study are available on request from the
corresponding author.
Acknowledgments:
In this article, the authors draw on contributions from many members of the
CeMOS Research Center. In particular, we would like to thank Stefan Schorz, Steffen Manser and
Julia Siber for providing technology and software. All images and plots without source were created
at the CeMOS institute-Centre for Mass Spectrometry and Optical Spectroscopy, 68163 Mannheim,
Germany.
Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design
of the study, in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript or in
the decision to publish the results.
References
1.
Nachtmann, M.; Deuerling, J.; Rädle, M. Molecule Sensitive Optical Imaging and Monitoring Techniques—A Review of
Applications in Micro-Process Engineering. Micromachines 2020,11, 353. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.
Microreactors-New Technology for Modern Chemistry Wolfgang Ehrfeld Volker Hessel Holger Löwe Wiley-VCH: Weinheim.
Org. Process. Res. Dev. 2001,5, 89. [CrossRef]
3.
Kakuta, N.; Yamashita, H.; Kawashima, D.; Kondo, K.; Arimoto, H.; Yamada, Y. Simultaneous imaging of temperature and
concentration of ethanol–water mixtures in microchannel using near-infrared dual-wavelength absorption technique. Meas. Sci.
Technol. 2016,27, 115401. [CrossRef]
4.
Gal-Or, E.; Gershoni, Y.; Scotti, G.; Nilsson, S.M.E.; Saarinen, J.; Jokinen, V.; Strachan, C.J.; Gennäs, G.B.A.; Yli-Kauhaluoma, J.;
Kotiaho, T. Chemical analysis using 3D printed glass microfluidics. Anal. Methods 2019,11, 1802–1810. [CrossRef]
5.
Rinke, G.; Ewinger, A.; Kerschbaum, S.; Rinke, M. In situ Raman spectroscopy to monitor the hydrolysis of acetal in microreactors.
Microfluid. Nanofluidics 2010,10, 145–153. [CrossRef]
6.
Fletcher, P.D.I.; Haswell, S.J.; Zhang, X. Monitoring of chemical reactions within microreactors using an inverted Raman
microscopic spectrometer. Electrophoresis 2003,24, 3239–3245. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7.
Adeosun, J.T.; Lawal, A. Numerical and experimental studies of mixing characteristics in a T-junction microchannel using
residence-time distribution. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2009,64, 2422–2432. [CrossRef]
8.
Medina, I.; Schmitt, L.; Kapoustina, V.; Scholl, S.; Rädle, M. Untersuchung von lokalen Schichtdickenverteilungen in Fluiden
mithilfe der Nahinfrarot-Bildanalyse. Chem. Ing. Tech. 2019,91, 1041–1048. [CrossRef]
9.
Delsman, E.R.; de Croon, M.H.; Elzinga, G.D.; Cobden, P.D.; Kramer, G.J.; Schouten, J.C. The Influence of Differences Between
Microchannels on Microreactor Performance. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2005,28, 367–375. [CrossRef]
10.
Walton, J.H.; Jenkins, J.D. A study of the ternary system, toluene-acetone-water. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1923
,45, 2555–2559. [CrossRef]
11.
Repke, J.-U.; Wozny, G. A Short Story of Modeling and Operation of Three-Phase Distillation in Packed Columns. Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res. 2004,43, 7850–7860. [CrossRef]
12.
Repke, J.-U.; Wozny, G. Experimental Investigations of Three-Phase Distillation in a Packed Column. Chem. Eng. Technol.
2002
,25,
513–519. [CrossRef]
13.
Siegert, M.; Stichlmair, J.; Repke, J.-U. Dreiphasenrektifikation in Packungskolonnen. Chem. Ing. Tech.
1999
,71,
819–823. [CrossRef]