life
Hypothesis
Evaluating the Microbial Habitability of Rogue Planets and
Proposing Speculative Scenarios on How They Might Act as
Vectors for Panspermia
Dirk Schulze-Makuch 1,2,3,4,* and Alberto G. Fairén5,6
Citation: Schulze-Makuch, D.;
Fairén, A.G. Evaluating the Microbial
Habitability of Rogue Planets and
Proposing Speculative Scenarios on
How They Might Act as Vectors for
Panspermia. Life 2021,11, 833.
https://doi.org/10.3390/life11080833
Academic Editor: Manasvi Lingam
Received: 14 July 2021
Accepted: 12 August 2021
Published: 14 August 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
1Astrobiology Group, Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Technische Universität Berlin,
10623 Berlin, Germany
2GFZ German Research Center for Geosciences, Section Geomicrobiology, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
3
Department of Experimental Limnology, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB),
16775 Stechlin, Germany
4School of the Environment, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99163, USA
5Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), 28850 Madrid, Spain; [email protected]
6Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
*Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-30-314-23736
Abstract:
There are two types of rogue planets, sub-brown dwarfs and “rocky” rogue planets. Sub-
brown dwarfs are unlikely to be habitable or even host life, but rocky rogue planets may have a liquid
ocean under a thick atmosphere or an ice layer. If they are overlain by an insulating ice layer, they are
also referred to as Steppenwolf planets. However, given the poor detectability of rocky rogue planets,
there is still no direct evidence of the presence of water or ice on them. Here we discuss the possibility
that these types of rogue planets could harbor unicellular organisms, conceivably based on a variety
of different energy sources, including chemical, osmotic, thermal, and luminous energy. Further,
given the theoretically predicted high number of rogue planets in the galaxy, we speculate that rogue
planets could serve as a source for galactic panspermia, transferring life to other planetary systems.
Keywords: rogue planet; microbial life; habitability; panspermia
1. Introduction
One of the implicit assumptions in the search for life is that life must evolve on a planet
that orbits a star. The Drake equation [
1
] exemplifies this assumption, not accounting for
any life that could exist on a rogue, or interstellar, planet. Indeed, energy is a prerequisite
for life [
2
], and the most obvious source of energy is the light from a star [
3
]. However,
rogue planets may not be as desolate and barren as generally thought. There are two types
of rogue planets, with very different environments.
The first type of rogue planet are failed stars, not nearly massive enough for nuclear
fusion to ignite their cores. These so-called “sub-brown dwarfs” [
4
] would be similar in
composition to the gas giants that we know of within our solar system. Their sizes could
range from several times the mass of Jupiter to as small as Uranus [
5
]. Like Jupiter, radiation
levels would be very high, and there would be a seamless transition from gas to liquid in
their deep atmospheres. Convective zones would mix the inner atmosphere with the outer
surface, bringing any organic compounds on the surface down into extreme temperatures
and pressures. Life within a gas giant has to be considered extremely unlikely. Although
gas giants may contain liquid water and even organic compounds in their atmosphere,
like Neptune in our solar system [
6
], an origin of life in an atmosphere, not involving a
solid-liquid interface, is difficult to imagine, as is a transfer of life from a rocky planet or
icy moon to a gas giant [7]. However, that type of rogue planet may be accompanied by a
large moon, which could be a potential abode of life. The first rogue planets of this type
Life 2021,11, 833. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11080833 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/life
Life 2021,11, 833 2 of 11
have been detected in 2012 and 2013 and have been estimated to have several times the
mass of Jupiter [8,9].
The second way a rogue planet may form is from gravitational dynamics in an early
solar system: small “rocky” planets get too close to very large planets in the chaotic
movements before the orbits are stabilized [
10
]. These encounters could potentially cast
the smaller planet out of its native solar system, letting it wander the galaxy as a rogue
planet [
11
]. If a planet is ejected from a solar system during planetary formation, it
could be very similar to Earth or the other inner planets or asteroids. It could have a
sufficient inventory of radioactive elements to heat and also melt its interior [
12
]. Life
could have originated on such an Earth-type planet before it was ejected from its solar
system, especially if it had a reducing atmosphere. In 2020 the first terrestrial-mass rogue
planet candidate was claimed to be detected using microlensing [
13
], showing that Mars to
Earth-sized mass rogue planets can be detected and characterized in principle using current
technology. However, detections are extremely challenging, because Mars to Earth-sized
planets are already difficult to identify when in orbit around a star. However, on theoretical
grounds, many of these terrestrial mass rogue planets should exist [
13
]. In the following,
we focus on the possibilities for life in these terrestrial types of rogue planets.
2. Liquid Water on Rogue Planets
Liquid water is a prerequisite for life as we know it (e.g., [
14
]). Given the poor
detectability of rogue planets, there is still no direct measurement evidence of the presence
of water on them, although several hypotheses have been considered in the past regarding
the presence of water within rogue planets. Once ejected, any possible atmosphere of a
rogue planet would collapse and freeze onto its surface. However, it has been suggested
that heat from radioactivity in the core could provide sufficient energy to keep the water
liquid beneath the newly formed icy surface [
12
,
15
]. This could be enough energy to
sustain a liquid ocean of water, provided it is insulated by a layer of ice on the outer surface
(Figure 1). Lingam and Loeb [
16
,
17
] estimated that planets with a subsurface ocean could
be 100 to 1000 times more common than rocky planets in the habitable zone of stars, with
many of these planets having the potential of being transformed into rogue planets. Since
water is such a common compound in the universe (given also that hydrogen is the most
common element and oxygen the third-most common element) [
7
], it seems reasonable that
many of these icy worlds may have ice caps consisting dominantly of water ice with liquid
water beneath, as also inferred for the icy moons Europa, Enceladus, and Ganymede (likely
among others) in our own solar system. It has been estimated that the maximum biomass
that might be sustainable in the deep subsurface of that type of environment would be a
few percent of that of Earth’s biosphere based on energetic considerations [
18
], which is
roughly comparable to earlier modeling studies of the European subsurface ocean [19].
A rogue planet that is harboring a subglacial ocean has been termed a Steppenwolf
planet because any life in that type of habitat would be analogous to a lone wolf wandering
the galactic steppe [
20
]. The lines in Figure 1show how much ice is necessary to sustain a
liquid ocean underneath as a function of the mass of the planet. The black line represents
the most realistic scenario, that of geothermal heat flux into the ocean equaling the radiative
heat flux out of it. The gray line represents a mixture of water and ammonia. The light gray
line represents an unlikely scenario where carbon dioxide vents push their gas up to the
surface, where it freezes and falls to the ground to form a very insulating layer.
Life 2021,11, 833 3 of 11
Life 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 11
out of the solar system. It would not have the required amount of water–it would take a
planet with similar composition, but 3.5 times more mass than Earth [20]. Alternatively,
Badescu [22] suggested that an optically thick atmosphere of methane, ethane, and carbon
dioxide could also enable water, ammonia, or ethane oceans on a rogue planet. We feel
that this option is most interesting for solvents with a low liquidity temperature such as
mixtures of ammonia and water, or ethane, and if life as we don’t know it can exist in
these solvents. The moon Titan in our solar system may be an ideal planetary body to
closely analyze exactly this possibility [23]. One problem with the envisioned thick atmos-
pheres [22] is that it may be difficult for a rogue planet to retain a sufficiently thick atmos-
phere for timescales of possibly billions of years. However, the problem can be overcome
if the rogue planet has elevated radionuclide substances, which–if sufficiently high-may
allow the presence of non-aqueous liquids on the surface of that planet, even if it has only
a thin atmosphere [24].
Figure 1. Amount of ice necessary to create a liquid ocean on a Steppenwolf planet (modified from
[20]).
3. Energy Sources for Life within Rogue Planets
3.1. Chemical Energy
The most basic energy source for life is chemical energy, and it has been proposed
also as the first form of energy used by life on Earth [7], mostly because it doesn´t require
a conversion from different energy sources. It is unclear which metabolic pathway was
the first on our planet. A basic autotrophic pathway seems to be methanogenesis [25],
Figure 1.
Amount of ice necessary to create a liquid ocean on a Steppenwolf planet (modified
from [20]).
Furthermore, under certain conditions, an ice layer might not even be necessary. It has
been suggested that a thick atmosphere of molecular hydrogen can keep enough pressure
and provide enough insulation to have liquid water on the outer surface of the planet
without needing an ice layer. This atmosphere will have to be 10
2
–10
4
bars [
21
]. If the
planet would be ejected out of the solar system quickly, enough hydrogen may be retained
for such a thick atmosphere and not being lost into space. Interestingly, if Earth were cast
out of the solar system. It would not have the required amount of water–it would take a
planet with similar composition, but 3.5 times more mass than Earth [
20
]. Alternatively,
Badescu [
22
] suggested that an optically thick atmosphere of methane, ethane, and carbon
dioxide could also enable water, ammonia, or ethane oceans on a rogue planet. We feel
that this option is most interesting for solvents with a low liquidity temperature such
as mixtures of ammonia and water, or ethane, and if life as we don’t know it can exist
in these solvents. The moon Titan in our solar system may be an ideal planetary body
to closely analyze exactly this possibility [
23
]. One problem with the envisioned thick
atmospheres [
22
] is that it may be difficult for a rogue planet to retain a sufficiently thick
atmosphere for timescales of possibly billions of years. However, the problem can be
overcome if the rogue planet has elevated radionuclide substances, which–if sufficiently
high-may allow the presence of non-aqueous liquids on the surface of that planet, even if it
has only a thin atmosphere [24].
3. Energy Sources for Life within Rogue Planets
3.1. Chemical Energy
The most basic energy source for life is chemical energy, and it has been proposed
also as the first form of energy used by life on Earth [
7
], mostly because it doesn
´
t require
a conversion from different energy sources. It is unclear which metabolic pathway was
the first on our planet. A basic autotrophic pathway seems to be methanogenesis [
25
],
which could be utilized nearly anywhere where volcanic activity is present, converting
carbon dioxide and hydrogen gas into water and methane. Alternatively, heterotrophy
Life 2021,11, 833 4 of 11
has been suggested as the first metabolic pathway on Earth [
26
,
27
], which may have used
organic macromolecules supplied by prebiotic synthesis [
28
] or cometary delivery [
29
].
Chemical energy would also be an obvious possibility for life on a rogue planet. There
are subsurface lithoautotrophic microbial ecosystems on Earth, which are not dependent
on surface-based photosynthesis, including methanogens, homoacetogens, and sulfate-
reducers, all mainly strictly anaerobes [
30
]. Metabolic activity has been measured in
subseafloor sediments, continental flood basalts, and granitic plutons, orders of magnitude
lower than that of life on Earth’s surface [
30
,
31
]. In these environments, autotrophic
microorganisms outnumber heterotrophs [
32
]. Gold [
33
] argued that the terrestrial deep
biosphere could host a total biomass equivalent or even larger than that at the Earth’s
surface. Importantly for rogue planets, the subsurface realm would be a highly stable
environment that may safeguard inhabitants against extremes and radical changes [
31
,
34
].
And there is evidence that chemolithotrophic metabolism is viable using iron meteorites
as the sole source of energy [
35
]. Therefore, whole rogue planets, beyond just meteorite
pieces, should provide a viable and stable environment as a habitat for microorganisms
during interstellar voyages.
3.2. Light Energy and Photosynthesis
Almost every form of life on Earth depends directly or indirectly on photosynthesis,
so it is challenging to think of an evolutionary pathway in which photosynthesis does not
appear. No nearby star to a rogue planet means that photosynthesis will face challenges to
develop as a common means of energy. One possibility in rogue planets is photosynthesis
independent of the light from a star. On Earth, some bacteria do photosynthesis from the
extremely feeble near-infrared glow of hydrothermal vents at the bottom of the ocean,
where no sunlight reaches [
36
]. We do not know if photosynthesis on Earth first appeared
on the surface and whether these seafloor bacteria have adapted later to the feeble glow, or
if it was the other way around. It is also conceivable that photosynthetic microorganisms of
an ice-covered ocean within a rogue planet could take advantage of surface sunlight during
the brief periods of transit near a star, briefly flourishing near the surface with increased
metabolic activity, to hide again in the dark subsurface for eons looking for the feeble glow
of the vents to survive until another star comes close. This is a scenario difficult to envision
in our part of the galaxy, which is quite remote but may be more likely close to the center
of the galaxy with a much higher frequency of stars.
3.3. Thermal Energy and Thermosynthesis
There are two other possible, maybe more intriguing energy sources on a rogue planet.
Hydrothermal vents on the ocean bottom are used by life on Earth for metabolism via redox
reactions, but in principle, thermotropic life forms that may exist in the subsurface oceans
may harvest the energy provided from hydrothermal vents by using thermal gradients or
heat directly. Muller [
37
–
39
] and Muller and Schulze-Makuch [
40
] suggested the use of
thermal gradients, which they termed thermosynthesis, as a plausible metabolic pathway.
A steam engine makes use of a phase transition and so could thermosynthesis. The mobility
of the molecules within a membrane would increase when membranes are undergoing the
thermotropic phase transition [
40
]. This kind of transition could plausibly result in a change
in potential across the membrane due to a change in dipole potential [
39
]. Very similar
potential changes that undergo the thermotropic phase transition have been measured
across monolayers of lipids at the water/air interface [
7
]. As these changes can easily
reach 100 mV, they would be high enough to drive ATP synthesis [
40
]. If this reasoning is
correct, thermosynthesis could also be a basic pathway of metabolism for organisms on
early Earth, possibly a progenitor of bacterial photosynthesis [
38
,
39
]. In addition, it has
also been considered as an option for possible life in Europa’s subsurface ocean [41].
Alternatively, “thermotrophs” could harvest energy from the high heat capacity of
water, which is about 4 kJ/kg under a wide range of temperature and pressure condi-
tions [
7
]. If a cell mass of 10
−12
g is assumed, which is similar to microbes on Earth [
42
],
Life 2021,11, 833 5 of 11
and if we further assume that one-tenth of the total cell mass is a water-filled vacuole,
then the thermotropic organism could gain about 2.5
×
10
6
eV of energy by lowering the
temperature of the vacuole by 1 K. The organism could extract about 9000 eV of usable
energy for a temperature change, for example, from 278 K to 277 K using the Carnot cy-
cle [
7
,
41
]. That energy gain could be further increased if a temperature differential of more
than 1 K is tapped. In principle, the vacuole, which is filled with hot water, would function
as an internal heat engine and at the same time may be used to provide the organism with
the needed buoyancy to float in the ocean water (Figure 2). One way the temperature
gradient between the vacuole and the cell plasma could be used is to produce high-energy
metabolites via conformational changes. If a cell is as large as the giant pantropical alga,
Valonia macrophysa [
43
], which has a water vacuole of about 10 g, the potential energy yield
that could be extracted is close to 6.2 ×1018 eV or 1 Joule [7].
Life 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 11
addition, it has also been considered as an option for possible life in Europa’s subsurface
ocean [41].
Alternatively, “thermotrophs” could harvest energy from the high heat capacity of
water, which is about 4 kJ/kg under a wide range of temperature and pressure conditions
[7]. If a cell mass of 10−12 g is assumed, which is similar to microbes on Earth [42], and if
we further assume that one-tenth of the total cell mass is a water-filled vacuole, then the
thermotropic organism could gain about 2.5 × 106 eV of energy by lowering the tempera-
ture of the vacuole by 1 K. The organism could extract about 9000 eV of usable energy for
a temperature change, for example, from 278 K to 277 K using the Carnot cycle [7,41]. That
energy gain could be further increased if a temperature differential of more than 1 K is
tapped. In principle, the vacuole, which is filled with hot water, would function as an
internal heat engine and at the same time may be used to provide the organism with the
needed buoyancy to float in the ocean water (Figure 2). One way the temperature gradient
between the vacuole and the cell plasma could be used is to produce high-energy metab-
olites via conformational changes. If a cell is as large as the giant pantropical alga, Valonia
macrophysa [43], which has a water vacuole of about 10 g, the potential energy yield that
could be extracted is close to 6.2 × 1018 eV or 1 Joule [7].
Inefficiency is a potential drawback to the use of thermal energy because the most
efficient thermodynamic system known is the Carnot cycle. Thus, most of the energy in a
thermal gradient would be dissipated as heat without being captured by chemical bonds,
and would also degrade the thermal gradient itself. A possible adaptation by the thermo-
tropic organism would be to shuttle back and forth across fairly sharp temperature gradi-
ents or to possess an elongated body and make use of convection to dissipate the unusable
entropy-related energy (Figure 2).
Figure 2. A sketch of how various types of thermotrophs could gain energy near a hydrothermal vent structure. In gray
are marked the hotter areas within the model organism from which thermal energy can be obtained. In model (1), the
thermotroph moves off the vent structure, but the vacuole is hotter and the putative organism can obtain energy from the
thermal gradient. The principle is the same for (2) to (4), but the model organisms remain attached to the substrate. The
heated vacuole moves within the cell (2), colder circulating water is heated within the organism (3), or an appendix of the
cell moves in the thermal gradient back and forth (4) (modified from [40]).
Figure 2.
A sketch of how various types of thermotrophs could gain energy near a hydrothermal vent structure. In gray
are marked the hotter areas within the model organism from which thermal energy can be obtained. In model (1), the
thermotroph moves off the vent structure, but the vacuole is hotter and the putative organism can obtain energy from the
thermal gradient. The principle is the same for (2) to (4), but the model organisms remain attached to the substrate. The
heated vacuole moves within the cell (2), colder circulating water is heated within the organism (3), or an appendix of the
cell moves in the thermal gradient back and forth (4) (modified from [40]).
Inefficiency is a potential drawback to the use of thermal energy because the most
efficient thermodynamic system known is the Carnot cycle. Thus, most of the energy
in a thermal gradient would be dissipated as heat without being captured by chemical
bonds, and would also degrade the thermal gradient itself. A possible adaptation by the
thermotropic organism would be to shuttle back and forth across fairly sharp temperature
gradients or to possess an elongated body and make use of convection to dissipate the
unusable entropy-related energy (Figure 2).
3.4. Osmotic Energy
An even more speculative source of energy would be energy obtained from osmotic
gradients. No organism on Earth is known to use osmotic gradients as an energy source,
but this could simply be the case because light and chemical energy are readily available
on our planet and also provides a larger amount of energy. If life originated on a rogue
planet early in its history, it would have been exposed to significant salinity gradients
given that large water reservoirs would have not been yet in chemical equilibrium with
the rocky mantle [
41
]. Microbial life may have remained in a hypo-osmotic cellular state
Life 2021,11, 833 6 of 11
even as the liquid water reservoirs became progressively saltier. Various organisms on
Earth can withstand high osmotic gradients. One example is teleosts, which are bony fish
such as sharks. They originated in fresh water and retained an osmotic differential of
about 0.7 osmoles between their intercellular fluids and the surrounding environment [
44
].
Some halophilic organisms can tolerate much higher gradients [
45
]. For example, the yeast
D. hansenii
can be found in hypersaline environments like the Great Salt Lake of Utah and
has been shown to grow in media containing up to 4 M NaCl [
46
]. Thus, it seems plausible
that an organism adapted to use salinity gradients as an energy source could use an osmotic
differential of at least five times the value that sharks are adapted to.
Using a value of 3.5 osmoles as a first conservative assumption, we can calculate the
energy yield as detailed in Schulze-Makuch and Irwin [
7
]: briefly, the osmotic pressure is
calculated by multiplying the molar solute concentration with the universal gas constant
and the absolute temperature. Then the osmotic pressure is multiplied by the cross-sectional
area of one water molecule to determine the force that acts upon one water molecule along
its concentration gradient. Finally, the energy gain is determined by multiplying the
calculated force by the distance the water molecule moves down its density gradient. If
we assume the distance to be 10
−8
m for a biomembrane, then the calculated potential
energy yield is 0.035 eV. Putting this in context with life on Earth as we know it, one
ATP can be phosphorylated from ADP for every 9 water molecules entering the cell by
osmosis. This is certainly much less efficient than chemical or light energy, where the
energy yield per reaction is around 2 eV, depending on the frequency of the light and the
specific redox-reaction considered, respectively. The direct coupling of the movement of
water molecules to phosphorylation reactions is not known for life on our planet, but it
could be an option when other energy sources are not as readily available.
Schulze-Makuch and Irwin [
41
] suggested as a plausible mechanism tertiary structural
changes in a channel-associated protein that would catalyze the formation of high energy
bonds, similar to ligand-induced conformational changes in membrane receptors that lead
to a series of steps culminating in the synthesis of high-energy cyclic AMP. Alternatively,
a reaction to form a high-energy bond could occur inside the cell when water is moving
inward along a membrane water channel from the hypotonic surrounding environment or
in the opposite direction when the water leaves the cell toward its hypertonic surrounding
environment. If so, then a putative organism could move between different layers of
salinity and each way being able to harvest energy. Enough energy could be in principle
gained to support an ecosystem [19,47].
3.5. Other Potential Energy Sources
Many other energy sources could in principle be utilized by life. However, those
are typically too low in energy gain or are too unpredictable to be used, for example,
magnetic fields, gravitational energy, radiolytic reactions, or electron oxidation. The energy
from magnetic fields could in principle be harvested by microorganisms via the Lorentz
force or via induction, but our planet
´
s magnetic field is not strong enough to make
this a competitive energy source compared to chemical or light energy [
7
]. However,
magnetotactic bacteria [
48
], and even some animals [
49
], are sensitive to magnetic fields,
and some planets are exposed to much stronger magnetic fields than Earth, especially
those close to neutron stars or magnetars [
50
]. Thus, magnetic fields are an energy source
that could be harvested on some extraterrestrial worlds. In the case of gravitational/tidal
energy, if a rogue planet is ejected together with its moon, which has been estimated to not
be a rare occurrence [
51
], then tidal energy would also be available to produce additional
heating. Another source of energy could be radioactivity: although it provides in principle
ample amounts of energy, the random fashion of the associated atomic decay and bursts of
energy when it occurs may prove too difficult to control for an organism [
7
]. Nevertheless,
radioactivity is largely responsible for the heating of the interior of a planetary body, which
then could be utilized by life as outlined above under Section 3.3. In addition, recent
experimental studies of marine sediment and sedimentary minerals [
52
,
53
] have found
Life 2021,11, 833 7 of 11
that radiolytic H
2
yields per unit radiation are magnified by up to 27 times relative to
pure water, depending on sediment composition. And this radiolytic H
2
is produced at
all sediment depths, suggesting that water radiolysis may be the key driver of microbial
activity in a broad range of settings in marine sediments on Earth older than a few million
years. Finally, laboratory studies have demonstrated that electrochemical enrichment is a
feasible approach for the isolation of microbes capable of gaining electrons directly from
insoluble minerals [
54
,
55
], including electrochemically active sulfur-oxidizing microbes
and sulfate-reducing microbes capable of cathode oxidation.
4. Discussion
Astronomical data on rogue planets are extremely poor at the moment. Previous
estimates suggest that the total number of compact objects in the mass range
10−8–10−2M
,
unbound to a host star, could reach 100,000 per main-sequence star. From this total
population of the so-called “nomads”, up to some tens can have mass enough to be
considered rogue planets [
56
]. The vast majority, however, would be small objects with a
mass below that of Mars. We may have experienced a couple of visits from such extrasolar
objects recently: the rocky object ‘Oumuamua [
57
] and the comet 2I/Borisov [
58
]. It is also
very likely that these encounters are more prevalent than previously thought, and that
we are now recording these high incidences of visits (2 in the past 5 years vs. none in the
previous 50) just as a result of the improvement of our detection systems.
Only very few rogue planets are known [
8
,
9
,
13
] because they are so difficult to detect.
Most exoplanets are discovered through their interactions with their parent star, which
clearly is not an option for rogue planets. Estimates of the number of rogue planets range
between 2 and 60 rogue planets per star in our galaxy [
56
]. Assuming the higher bound,
then statistically, a rogue planet would cross the path of the inner Solar System once every
25 million years [59].
If the ice layer of the rogue planet is convective, oxidants from the surface could
be sinking to the subsurface liquid oceans and provide oxygen to any microbial life,
similarly as proposed for Europa [
60
]. Thus, nutrient cycling could occur within a rogue
planet even without plate tectonics, which is the major recycling mechanism on Earth.
When considering possible life on another world, including a rogue planet, we have to be
open-minded for novel adaptations of how life might have dealt with the environmental
challenges at hand [
47
], but for a Steppenwolf-type of a rogue planet, the icy moons in our
solar system may be a first suitable analog model.
The convective flow up to the outer surface of the rogue planet, as has been suggested
for Europa [
61
], can provide a route to follow for potential microbes, which then could
become eventually trapped and encased in a dormant state within the ice. Thus, rogue
planets could function as a repository for dormant or fossilized life. In permanently
frozen habitats on Earth, even some multicellular organisms may be preserved for tens
of thousands of years, including stems of Antarctic moss successfully regrown from an
over 1000-year sample covered by ice for about 400 years [
62
], rotifers recovered from
24,000-year-old Arctic permafrost [
63
], nematodes revived from the Siberian permafrost
with source sediments dated over 30,000 years [
64
], and campion plants regenerated from
seed tissue preserved in relict 32,000-year-old permafrost [
65
]. Of course, access to any
dormant or fossilized life, set aside the technological challenge it will represent, may be
difficult due to the radiation environment of interstellar space and only be found at least
several meters beneath the planetary surface.
But how could a transfer of microorganisms from a rogue planet to a habitable planet
occur? Lingam and Loeb [
16
] suggested that a rogue planet could be temporarily captured
by a star, and then would seed another planet that orbits the same star. This scenario has
been proposed previously for the transfer of microbial life from Mars to Earth or vice versa
(e.g., [
66
–
68
]), so is reasonable. Lingam and Loeb [
16
] calculated various probabilities for
this event and concluded that the chances for this type of interplanetary panspermia are
raised by several orders of magnitude in a closely packed planetary system with a low-mass
Life 2021,11, 833 8 of 11
star. Certainly, the proximity of the rogue planet, which was temporarily captured by the
star, would enhance the probabilities of transfer of microbial life from the rogue planet.
A different approach was taken by Wickramasinghe et al. [
69
], who pointed out that
large impacts–like the one that resulted in the Chicxulub crater 65 million years ago–would
eject large amounts of debris, including a microbial load, into the zodiacal cloud. During
the impact, a significant fraction of material would not have been shocked and heated to
sterilization levels, and microbes may be able to stay viable in the cloud for millions of
years [
70
,
71
]. Wickramasinghe et al. [
69
] considered that scenario for an Earth-type planet
seeding a rogue planet as realistic. If so, the same should be true for the reverse transport,
from the rogue planet to the planet within the solar system.
In addition to the two scenarios above, given in the literature, we can envision and
propose here two additional scenarios. The first one is if a rogue planet passes closely by
a habitable planet, part of the outer layer of the rogue planet could be blown away by
gravitational disturbances, only to be gathered up by the habitable rocky planet. Dormant
life that had been trapped in the icy layer might become active again and establish a
biosphere on the habitable planet. In a solar system like ours, that scenario could take place
on an Earth-like planet in the inner solar system, or maybe at an icy moon of the outer
solar system.
The second additional scenario is that the rogue planet may end up colliding (or
undergoing a near-collision) with one of the planets in the solar system. This can be
generally thought of as a sterilizing effect, such as when a Mars-sized object collided
with Earth in early solar system history that resulted in the creation of the Moon [
72
,
73
].
However, given an expected heterogeneous distribution of energy and matter, it is not
out of the question that some dormant life may survive that impact, and eventually seeds
the planet with which the rogue planet collided. The Mars-size impactor could have, in
fact, been a rogue planet (or, more likely, became one after the collision). In the case of the
creation of Earth
´
s Moon, it seems possible that early Earth and the early Moon shared
a common atmosphere. A rogue planet may also conceivably have changed the orbiting
direction of Venus or stripped Mercury of most of its mantle and crust [74].
We realize that the transfer of life from a rogue planet to a habitable planet can only
occur under very constrained environmental conditions. Certainly, all four scenarios for
panspermia above are highly speculative. However, given current estimations of so many
rogue planets and also evidence for so many major impacts—as evidenced by the cratering
records on the planets and moons in our solar system—in our galaxy and also the universe,
these are nevertheless mechanisms that merit further investigation and modeling to reveal
which of these proposed processes may offer a realistic transfer process. However, a more
in-depth treatise including modeling is beyond the objectives of this work.
5. Conclusions
We have presented here the hypothesis that microbial life could exist within rogue
planets, especially if it originated there very early on during their natural history. Life could
use a variety of energy sources, including energy sources that are not used by life on Earth.
Rogue planets could also serve as a source pool for galactic panspermia given the enormous
number of rogue planets estimated to exist in the galaxy and frequent impacts, even if the
transfer mechanism of life may only be feasible in rare circumstances. The likelihood of a
feasible life transfer mechanism should be further investigated and modeled.
Author Contributions:
The research was conceptualized, the topic investigated and analyzed, and
the paper written and iterated by both authors (D.S.-M. and A.G.F.). All authors have read and
agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding:
This work was supported by the Project “MarsFirstWater”, European Research Council
Consolidator Grant no 818602.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Life 2021,11, 833 9 of 11
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Acknowledgments:
The authors are thankful for the comments and suggestions of the four reviewers,
which helped to significantly improve this manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design
of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or
in the decision to publish the results.
References
1. Drake, F.D. Intelligent Life in Space; Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 1962.
2.
Kok, B.; Radmer, R. Energy requirements of a biosphere. In Chemical Evolution of the Giant Planets; Ponnamperuma, C., Ed.;
Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1976; pp. 183–197.
3. Youvan, D.C.; Mars, B.L. Molecular mechanisms of photosynthesis. Sci. Am. 1987,256, 42–49. [CrossRef]
4.
Caballero, J.A. A review on substellar objects below the deuterium burning mass limit: Planets, brown dwarfs or what? Geosciences
2018,8, 362. [CrossRef]
5.
Sengupta, S. Brown dwarfs: The missing link between stars and planets. In Worlds Beyond Our Own; Sengupta, S., Ed.; Springer:
Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 59–65.
6.
Baker, V.R.; Dohm, J.M.; Fairén, A.G.; Ferré, T.P.A.; Ferris, J.C.; Miyamoto, H.; Schulze-Makuch, D. Extraterrestrial hydrogeology.
Hydrogeol. J. 2005,13, 51–68. [CrossRef]
7. Schulze-Makuch, D.; Irwin, L.N. Life in the Universe: Expectations and Constraints, 3rd ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2018; 343p.
8.
Delorme, P.; Gagné, J.; Malo, L.; Reylé, C.; Artigau, E.; Albert, L.; Forveille, T.; Delfosse, X.; Allard, F.; Homeier, D. CFBDSIR2149-
0403: A 4–7 Jupiter-mass free-floating planet in the young moving group AB Doradus? Astron. Astrophys.
2012
,548, A26.
[CrossRef]
9.
Liu, M.C.; Magnier, E.A.; Deacon, N.R.; Allers, K.N.; Dupuy, T.J.; Kotson, M.C.; Aller, K.M.; Burgett, W.S.; Chambers, K.C.; Draper,
P.W.; et al. The extremely red, young L dwarf PSO J318.5338–22.8603: A free-floating planetary-mass analog to directly imaged
young gas-giant planets. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2013,777, L20. [CrossRef]
10. Lund, M.B. Worlds in migration. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1903.12437.
11. Bromley, B.C.; Kenyon, S.J. The fate of scattered planets. Astrophys. J. 2014,796, 141. [CrossRef]
12.
Bada, J.L. State-of-the-art instruments for detecting extraterrestrial life. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
2001
,98, 797–800. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
13.
Mróz, P.; Poleski, R.; Gould, A.; Udalski, A.; Sumi, T.; Szyma´nski, M.K.; Soszy´nski, I.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Kozłowski, S.; Skowron, J.;
et al. A terrestrial-mass rogue planet candidate detected in the shortest-timescale microlensing event. Astrophys. J. Lett.
2020
,903,
L11. [CrossRef]
14.
Fairén, A.G.; Gómez-Elvira, J.; Briones, C.; Prieto-Ballesteros, O.; Rodríguez-Manfredi, J.A.; López Heredero, R.; Belenguer, T.;
Moral, A.G.; Moreno-Paz, M.; Parro, V. The Complex Molecules Detector (CMOLD): A fluidic-based instrument suite to search
for (bio)chemical complexity on Mars and icy moons. Astrobiology 2020,20, 1076–1096. [CrossRef]
15.
Ruiz, J.; Fairén, A.G. Seas under ice: Conditions for the stability of liquid-water oceans within icy worlds. Earth Moon Planets
2005,97, 79–90. [CrossRef]
16. Lingam, M.; Loeb, A. Subsurface exolife. Int. J. Astrobiol. 2019,18, 112–141. [CrossRef]
17.
Lingam, M.; Loeb, A. Life in the Cosmos: From Biosignatures to Technosignatures; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA,
2021.
18.
Lingam, M.; Loeb, A. Potential for liquid water biochemistry deep under the surface of Moon, Mars, and beyond. Astrophys. J.
Lett. 2020,901, L11. [CrossRef]
19.
Irwin, L.N.; Schulze-Makuch, D. Strategy for modeling putative ecosystems on Europa. Astrobiology
2003
,3, 813–821. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
20.
Abbot, D.; Switzer, E. The Steppenwolf: A proposal for a habitable planet in interstellar space. Astrophys. J. Lett.
2011
,735, L27.
[CrossRef]
21. Stevenson, D. Life-Sustaining Planets in Interstellar Space? Nature 1999,400, 32. [CrossRef]
22. Badescu, V. Free-floating planets as potential seats for aqueous and non-aqueous life. Icarus 2011,216, 485–491. [CrossRef]
23.
Shapiro, R.; Schulze-Makuch, D. The search for alien life in our solar system: Strategies and priorities. Astrobiology
2009
,9,
335–343. [CrossRef]
24.
Lingam, M.; Loeb, A. On the habitable lifetime of terrestrial worlds with high radionuclide abundances. Astrophys. J. Lett.
2020
,
889, L20. [CrossRef]
25. Lyu, Z.; Shao, N.; Akinyemi, T.; Whitman, W.B. Methanogenesis. Curr. Biol. 2018,28, R727–R732. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. Haldane, J. The origin of life. Ration. Annu. 1929,148, 3–10.
27. Fox, S.W.; Dose, K. Molecular Evolution and the Origin of Life; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 1977.
28. Miller, S.L.; Orgel, L.E. The Origins of Life on the Earth; Prentice-Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1974.
29.
Chyba, C.F.; Thomas, P.J.; Brookshaw, L.; Sagan, C. Cometary delivery of organic molecules to the early Earth. Science
1990
,249,
366–373. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Life 2021,11, 833 10 of 11
30. Stevens, T. Lithoautotrophy in the subsurface. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1997,20, 327–337. [CrossRef]
31.
D
´
Hondt, S.; Rutherford, S.; Spivack, A.J. Metabolic activity of subsurface life in deep-sea sediments. Science
2002
,295, 2067–2070.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
32.
Stevens, T.O.; McKinley, J.P. Lithoautotrophic microbial ecosystems in deep basalt aquifers. Science
1995
,270, 450–455. [CrossRef]
33. Gold, T. The deep, hot biosphere. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992,89, 6045–6049. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34.
Sleep, N.; Zahnle, K. Refugia from asteroid impacts on early Mars and the early Earth. J. Geophys. Res.
1998
,103, 28529–28544.
[CrossRef]
35.
González-Toril, E.; Martínez-Frías, J.; Gómez Gómez, J.M.; Rull, F.; Amils, R. Iron meteorites can support the growth of acidophilic
chemolithoautotrophic microorganisms. Astrobiology 2005,5, 406–414. [CrossRef]
36.
Beatty, J.T.; Overmann, J.; Lince, M.T.; Manske, A.K.; Lang, A.S.; Blankenship, R.E.; Van Dover, C.L.; Martinson, T.A.; Plumley,
F.G. An obligately photosynthetic bacterial anaerobe from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
2005
,102,
9306–9310. [CrossRef]
37.
Muller, A.W.J. Thermosynthesis by biomembranes: Energy gain from cyclic temperature changes. J. Theor. Biol.
1985
,115, 429–453.
[CrossRef]
38.
Muller, A.W.J. Were the first organisms heat engines? A new model for biogenesis and the early evolution of biological energy
conversion. Prog. Biophys. Molec. Biol. 1995,63, 193–231. [CrossRef]
39. Muller, A.W.J. Finding extraterrestrial organisms living on thermosynthesis. Astrobiology 2003,3, 555–564. [CrossRef]
40. Muller, A.W.J.; Schulze-Makuch, D. Thermal energy and the origin of life. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 2006,36, 177–189. [CrossRef]
41.
Schulze-Makuch, D.; Irwin, L.N. Energy cycling and hypothetical organisms in Europa’s ocean. Astrobiology
2002
,2, 105–121.
[CrossRef]
42. Madigan, M.T.; Martinko, J.M.; Parker, J. Brock Biology of Microorganisms; Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000.
43.
Shihira-Ishikawa, I.; Nawata, T. The structure and physiological properties of the cytoplasm in intact Valonia cell. Jpn. J. Phycol.
1992,40, 151–159.
44. Wilmer, P.; Stone, G.; Johnston, I. Environmental Physiology of Animals; Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK, 2000.
45.
Heinz, J.; Krahn, T.; Schulze-Makuch, D. A new record for microbial perchlorate tolerance: Fungal growth in NaClO
4
Brines and
its implications for putative life on Mars. Life 2020,10, 53. [CrossRef]
46.
Breuer, U.; Harms, H. Debaryomyces hansenii—An extremophilic yeast with biotechnological potential. Yeast
2006
,23, 415–437.
[CrossRef]
47.
Irwin, L.N.; Schulze-Makuch, D. The astrobiology of alien worlds: Known and unknown forms of life. Universe
2020
,6, 130.
[CrossRef]
48. Blakemore, R.P. Magnetotactic bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1982,36, 217–238. [CrossRef]
49. Gould, J.L. Animal navigation: The evolution of magnetic orientation. Curr. Biol. 2018,18, R482–R484. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
50.
Ibrahim, A.I.; Markwardt, C.B.; Swank, J.H.; Ransom, S.; Roberts, M.; Kaspi, V.; Woods, P.M.; Safi-Harb, S.; Balman, S.; Parke,
W.C.; et al. Discovery of a transient magnetar: XTE J1810-197. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2004,609, L21. [CrossRef]
51.
Debes, J.H.; Sigurdsson, S. The survival rate of ejected terrestrial planets with moons. Astrophys. J.
2007
,668, L167–L170.
[CrossRef]
52.
Sauvage, J.F.; Flinders, A.; Spivack, A.J.; Pockalny, R.; Dunlea, A.G.; Anderson, C.H.; Smith, D.C.; Murray, R.W.; D’Hondt, S. The
contribution of water radiolysis to marine sedimentary life. Nat. Commun. 2021,12, 1297. [CrossRef]
53.
Lollar, B.S.; Heuer, V.B.; McDermott, J.; Tille, S.; Warr, O.; Moran, J.J.; Telling, J.; Hinrichs, K.U. A window into the abiotic carbon
cycle—Acetate and formate in fracture waters in 2.7 billion years-old host rocks of the Canadian Shield. Geochim. Cosmochim.
Acta 2021,294, 295–314. [CrossRef]
54.
Pirbadian, S.; Barchinger, S.E.; Leung, K.M.; Byun, H.S.; Jangir, Y.; Bouhenni, R.A.; Reed, S.B.; Romine, M.F.; Saffarini, D.A.; Shi, L.;
et al. Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 nanowires are outer membrane and periplasmic extensions of the extracellular electron transport
components. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014,111, 12883–12885. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
55.
Rowe, A.R.; Chellamuthu, P.; Lam, B.; Okamoto, A.; Nealson, K.H. Marine sediments microbes capable of electrode oxidations as
a surrogate for lithotrophic insoluble substrate metabolism. Front. Microbiol. 2015,5, 784. [CrossRef]
56.
Strigari, L.; Barnabè, M.; Marshall, P.; Blandford, R. Nomads of the Galaxy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.
2012
,423, 1856–1865.
[CrossRef]
57.
Meech, K.J.; Weryk, R.; Micheli, M.; Kleyna, J.T.; Hainaut, O.R.; Jedicke, R.; Wainscoat, R.J.; Chambers, K.C.; Keane, J.V.; Petric, A.;
et al. A brief visit from a red and extremely elongated interstellar asteroid. Nature 2017,552, 378–381. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
58.
Opitom, C.; Fitzsimmons, A.; Jehin, E.; Moulane, Y.; Hainaut, O.; Meech, K.J.; Yang, B.; Snodgrass, C.; Micheli, M.; Keane, J.V.;
et al. 2I/Borisov: A C2-depleted interstellar comet. Astron. Astrophys. 2019,631, L8. [CrossRef]
59.
Bayaz, R. Trillions of Rogue Planets with Life Roam Milky Way; Outnumber Stars by Factors of Thousands; Before Its News: Mill Valley,
CA, USA, 2012. Available online: http://beforeitsnews.com/space/2012/05/trillions-of-rogue-planets-with-life-roam-milky-
way-outnumber-stars-by-factors-of-thousands-2124171.html (accessed on 11 May 2012).
60.
Chyba, C.F.; Phillips, C.B. Possible ecosystems and the search for life on Europa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA
2001
,98, 801–804.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
61.
Greenberg, R.; Geissler, P.; Tufts, B.R.; Hoppa, G.V. Habitability of Europa
´
s crust: The role of tidal-tectonic processes. J. Geophys.
Res. Planets 2000,105, 17551–17562. [CrossRef]
Life 2021,11, 833 11 of 11
62.
Roads, E.; Longton, R.E.; Convey, P. Millennial timescale regeneration in a moss from Antarctica. Curr. Biol.
2014
,24, R222–R223.
[CrossRef]
63.
Shmakova, L.; Malavin, S.; Iakovenko, N.; Vishnivetskaya, T.; Shain, D.; Plewka, M.; Rivkina, E. A living bdelloid rotifer from
24,000-year-old Arctic permafrost. Curr. Biol. 2021,31, R712–R713. [CrossRef]
64.
Shatilovich, A.V.; Tchesunov, A.V.; Neretina, T.V.; Grabarnik, I.P.; Gubin, S.V.; Vishnivetskaya, T.A.; Onstott, T.C.; Rivkina, E.M.
Viable nematodes from late Pleistocene permafrost of the Kolyma river lowland. Dokl. Biol. Sci.
2018
,480, 100–102. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
65.
Yashina, S.; Gubin, S.; Maksimovich, S.; Yashina, A.; Gakhova, E.; Gilichinsky, D. Regeneration of whole fertile plants from
30,000-y-old fruit tissue buried in Siberian permafrost. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012,109, 4008–4013. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
66.
Kirschvink, J.L.; Weiss, B.P. Mars, panspermia, and the origin of life: Where did it all begin? Palaeontol. Electron.
2002
,4, 8–15.
Available online: http://palaeo-electronica.org/paleo/2001_2/editor/mars.html (accessed on 30 July 2021).
67. Melosh, H.J. Exchange of meteorites (and life?) between stellar systems. Astrobiology 2003,3, 207–215. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
68.
Schulze-Makuch, D.; Irwin, L.N.; Fairén, A.G. Drastic environmental change and its effects on a planetary biosphere. Icarus
2013
,
225, 775–780. [CrossRef]
69.
Wickramasinghe, N.C.; Wallis, J.; Wallis, D.H.; Schild, R.E.; Gibson, C.H. Life-bearing primordial planets in solar vicinity.
Astrophys. Space Sci. 2012,341, 295–299. [CrossRef]
70.
Wallis, M.K.; Wickramasinghe, N.C. Interstellar transfer of planetary microbiota. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett.
2004
,348, 52–61.
[CrossRef]
71. Wickramasinghe, J.T.; Wickramasinghe, N.-C.; Napier, W.M. Comets and the Origin of Life; World Scientific: Singapore, 2010.
72. Hartmann, W.K.; Davis, D.R. Satellite-sized planetesimals and lunar origin. Icarus 1975,24, 504–515. [CrossRef]
73.
Jacobsen, S.B. The Hf-W isotopic system and the origin of the Earth and Moon. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.
2005
,33, 531–570.
[CrossRef]
74. Benz, W.; Slattery, W.L.; Cameron, A.G.W. Collisional stripping of Mercury´s mantle. Icarus 1988,74, 516–528. [CrossRef]
