FULL PAPER
www.advquantumtech.com
Plug&Play Fiber-Coupled 73 kHz Single-Photon Source
Operating in the Telecom O-Band
Anna Musiał,* Kinga ˙
Zołnacz, Nicole Srocka, Oleh Kravets, Jan Große, Jacek Olszewski,
Krzysztof Poturaj, Grzegorz Wójcik, Paweł Mergo, Kamil Dybka, Mariusz Dyrkacz,
Michał Dłubek, Kristian Lauritsen, Andreas Bülter, Philipp-Immanuel Schneider,
Lin Zschiedrich, Sven Burger, Sven Rodt, Wacław Urba´
nczyk, Grzegorz S˛
ek,
and Stephan Reitzenstein*
A user-friendly, fiber-coupled, single-photon source operating at telecom
wavelengths is a key component of photonic quantum networks providing
long-haul, ultra-secure data exchange. To take full advantage of
quantum-mechanical data protection and to maximize the transmission rate
and distance, a true quantum source providing single photons on demand is
highly desirable. This great challenge is tackled by developing a ready-to-use
semiconductor quantum-dot-based device that launches single photons at a
wavelength of 1.3 µm directly into a single-mode optical fiber. In the proposed
approach, the quantum dot is deterministically integrated into a
nanophotonic structure to ensure efficient on-chip coupling into a fiber. The
whole arrangement is integrated into a 19ʺcompatible housing to enable
stand-alone operation by cooling via a compact Stirling cryocooler. The
realized source delivers single photons with a multiphoton events probability
as low as 0.15 and a single-photon emission rate of up to 73 kHz into a
standard telecom single-mode fiber.
Dr. A. Musiał, O. Kravets, Prof. G. S ˛
ek
Laboratory for Optical Spectroscopy of Nanostructures
Department of Experimental Physics
Wrocław University of Science and Technology
Wybrze˙
ze Wyspia´
nskiego 27, Wrocław 50-370, Poland
E-mail: anna.musial@pwr.edu.pl
K. ˙
Zołnacz, J. Olszewski, Prof. W. Urba´
nczyk
Department of Optics and Photonics
Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
Wybrze˙
ze Wyspia´
nskiego 27, Wrocław 50-370, Poland
N. Srocka, J. Große, Dr. S. Rodt, Prof. S. Reitzenstein
Institute of Solid State Physics
Technische Universität Berlin
Hardenbergstraße 36, Berlin 10623, Germany
E-mail: [email protected]
The ORCID identification number(s) for the author(s) of this article
can be found under https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202000018
© 2020 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.
KGaA, Weinheim. This is an open access article under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution
and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly
cited.
DOI: 10.1002/qute.202000018
1. Introduction
Sources of single photons (SPSs) are
fundamental building blocks for pho-
tonic quantum technology, for example,
secure quantum communication,[1,2]
quantum internet,[3] and linear quantum
computation.[4,5] Recent world-wide activ-
ities on the implementation of quantum
networks,[6–11] including a satellite node,[12]
reflect the importance of the field. Among
different SPS concepts, to date, the purest
single-photon emission is provided by
semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) fea-
turing probabilities of multiphoton events
as low as 10−5for emission wavelengths
below 1 µm[13] (excluding their use for
long-haul transmission),[14–16] and 10−4at
telecom wavelengths under non-resonant
excitation.[17] Thus QDs constitute superb
K. Poturaj, Dr. G. Wójcik, Dr. P. Mergo
Laboratory of Optical Fibers Technology
Institute of Chemical Sciences
Faculty of Chemistry
Maria Curie Sklodowska University
Maria Curie Sklodowska Sq. 3, Lublin 20-031, Poland
K. Dybka, M. Dyrkacz, Dr. M. Dłubek
Fibrain Sp. z o.o.
Zaczernie 190F, Zaczernie 36-062, Poland
K. Lauritsen, A. Bülter
PicoQuant GmbH
Rudower Chaussee 29, Berlin 12489, Germany
Dr. P.-I. Schneider, Dr. L. Zschiedrich, Dr. S. Burger
JCMwave GmbH
Bolivarallee 22, Berlin 14050, Germany
Dr.S.Burger
Zuse Institute Berlin
Takustraße 7, Berlin 14195, Germany
Adv. Quantum Technol. 2020,3, 2000018 2000018 (1 of 9) © 2020 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.advquantumtech.com
quantum emitters in terms of scalability, integration, and com-
patibility with advanced semiconductor technology.[18–25] Agen-
eral drawback hindering real-world applications of In(Ga)As QDs
is the cryogenic operation temperature. In fact, this is the main
reason why commercially available quantum key distribution sys-
tems and experimental quantum networks are almost exclusively
based on sources utilizing spontaneous parametric down conver-
sion or attenuated lasers.[7–12,26–28] This is despite the drawbacks
that the former is probabilistic with low efficiency, whereas the
latter does not inherently provide single photons making trans-
mission susceptible to the photon number splitting attack.[29]
In this work, we focus on developing a user-friendly SPS for
quantum communication in the telecom O-band. This spectral
window features a local minimum of loss in silica fibers, zero
dispersion, and is suitable for multiplexing with C-band classical
signals, without the need for expensive dark fibers for the quan-
tum channel, due to good spectral isolation reducing Raman
scattering. Interestingly, fiber-based quantum links have already
been implemented using QDs at the telecom O-band by KTH
Stockholm and by Toshiba-Cambridge.[30] However, in all these
reports, the source was operated in complex and bulky experi-
mental setups with QD emission coupled externally to a fiber. In
order to take the application of QDs in quantum technologies to
the next level, we developed a user-friendly “plug&play” QD SPS
that is fiber-coupled, compact, and portable; includes a cooling
system; and provides a stable train of spectrally filtered single
photons in the O-band via a standard telecommunication single-
mode fiber. Importantly, this source is very convenient for the end
user as it does not require any adjustment and is fully operational
after a 15 min cool-down cycle. In contrast, commercially avail-
able QD-based sources[31] utilize a standard bulky and expensive
experimental cryostat and proof-of-principle realizations of com-
pact designs[32] are multimode fiber-coupled. Moreover, both ap-
proaches operate at shorter wavelengths below 1 µm and require
external spectral filtering of the single QD emission. A previous
work reporting on a plug&play-like SPS operating in the telecom
O-band[14] is based on the random positioning of a single-mode
fiber bundle with respect to a regular non-deterministic micropil-
lar array featuring 30% multiphoton events. Whereas in our
case, the QD-mesa fabrication technology and the positioning of
the fiber with respect to the mesa are fully deterministic, which
allow for the utilization of a single-mode fiber and the integration
with a highly efficient spectral filtering system. Overall, this is
far beyond what has been reported so far in the field.
2. Results
2.1. Approach and Design
Our concept for the realization of a compact fiber-coupled, single-
photon source is presented in Figure 1a. The overall scheme
aims at providing the end user with a stable source of internally
or externally triggered 1.3 µm single photons directly in a stan-
dard single-mode fiber. The source is easy to handle and oper-
ates at stable photon flux without the need of any alignment or
additional spectral filtering, and can be further used, for exam-
ple, for implementing quantum communication or computation
schemes.
The frame in the scheme marks elements that are placed in
a19ʺcompatible housing shown in the image in Figure 1b.
The desired functionality is realized in the following way: emis-
sion of the pulsed (80 MHz, pulse length <50 ps), non-resonant
(805 nm), fiber-coupled, electrically triggered, semiconductor
diode laser is first spectrally filtered to transmit only the laser
line itself into the fiber arrangement. The laser filter avoids un-
wanted broadband emission background, for example, sponta-
neous emission from the laser cavity at the fiber output of our
quantum device. In fact, while broad background emission (typ-
ically in the range of 600–1600 nm) from the laser is too low
to efficiently excite QDs, it is comparable to the single QD sig-
nal. Therefore, it is crucial to filter this background out directly
after the excitation laser. Once background emission passes the
pumping filter in the all fiber configuration, it would not be fil-
tered out by any other component and it would be spectrally inte-
grated by the single-photon detectors into the photon flux. In that
case, even the low, spectrally broad laser background could result
in a total number of photons exceeding the number of photons
from a single optical QD transition and therefore would make
the whole system completely unusable. The spectrally filtered,
single-mode laser signal is delivered to the sample via a reflection
channel (see Figure 1a) of a specially designed three-port filter for
pumping. The aforementioned fiber components are based on
standard telecom fibers and they are spliced to a high numerical
aperture fiber (numerical aperture (NA) =0.42), which is pre-
cisely positioned with respect to the single-photon emitter via a
recently developed interferometric method[33] with an alignment
accuracy of 50 nm and fixed to the sample surface by low tempera-
ture compatible epoxy glue (see Experimental Section for details).
It is important for a potential commercialization of our concept
to perform not only the fiber alignment in a deterministic way,
but also the device fabrication itself. For that, we apply in situ
electron-beam lithography to preselect suitable QDs via cathodo-
luminescence mapping before integrating them into microstruc-
tures with a process yield >90% and a positioning accuracy of
about 40 nm.[34] This way, cylindrical mesas were deterministi-
cally fabricated around preselected QDs in ≈20 µm ×20 µm writ-
ing fields (see inset to Figure 1c). In addition, the writing fields
act as apertures and facilitate the orientation on the sample sur-
face by mapping of its topography via a fiber in the alignment
step. An exemplary cathodoluminescence map is shown in Fig-
ure 1c with the corresponding emission intensity color-coded for
a narrow spectral range corresponding to the target wavelength
of 1293–1295 nm at 40 K.[34] The position of the selected QD for
device processing is marked by a black circle in Figure 1c. It is
characterized by emission in the spectral range of interest, high
intensity, and good spatial separation, which indicates that it orig-
inates from a single QD. This preselected QD is deterministically
integrated into a cylindrical mesa with a diameter of 1090 ±50
nm. Emission from this QD-micromesa is collected via the high-
NA fiber and enters a transmission channel of the pumping filter
that at the same time filters out the excitation signal. Finally, the
target excitonic line of the QD is spectrally selected from emis-
sion of other QD transitions such as the biexciton via a narrow
(0.6 nm) fiber-integrated band-pass filter. The exit port of this fil-
ter is connected to the FC/PC fiber connector at the optical output
of our stand-alone single-photon source. The sample design, the
microstructure, and fiber geometry, as well as the placement of
Adv. Quantum Technol. 2020,3, 2000018 2000018 (2 of 9) © 2020 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.advquantumtech.com
Figure 1. a) Scheme of the fully fiber-coupled single-photon source—the frame marks the device with a standard telecom single-mode FC/PC fiber con-
nector as output. b) Image of the actual device with Stirling cryocooler on the left, pulsed excitation laser on the bottom-right, and the fiber components
secured on the back wall. The ventilation openings in the housing and extra fans provide air flow for cooling of the Stirling cryocooler, which is operated
in vertical position and mounted to the metal frame. c) Active region and sample patterning: spatial low-temperature (15 K) cathodoluminescence map
in the spectral range corresponding to the target wavelength (1293–1295 nm) with the emission intensity color-coded and the target QD marked by a
black circle. Inset: SEM image of the patterned sample with a mesa etched at the position of the target QD marked by a black circle.
the fiber follow the results of numerical optimization of the de-
sign parameters. To this end, the propagation of the light emitted
by the QD was simulated using a finite-elements method.[35] The
system parameters with optimal fiber-coupling efficiency were
determined using Bayesian optimization as global optimization
method.[36]
One of many technological challenges in implementing our
device concept is the filtering of all spurious spectral contribu-
tions besides the single photons originating from the target QD
transition from the all-fiber coupled system. This is realized by
customized fiber components described in detail below. These
optical elements have to provide high spectral isolation of the tar-
get QD transition with minimum insertion loss.
2.2. Specialty Fiber Components
Customized fiber components were designed and fabricated to
fulfill the requirements of the stand-alone SPS device concept.
Their optical characteristics (see Figure 2) were evaluated using
a supercontinuum light source and an optical spectrum analyzer
(OSA). The laser filter responsible for cleaning preliminarily the
laser spectrum (see Figure 2a) has high transmission at the laser
line wavelength (805 nm) of –2.5 dB and high attenuation in the
spectral range of the QD emission (–62 dB). For the flexibility of
the optical excitation, this filter is a broad band-pass to allow for
application of different laser wavelengths in the range of 700–
1000 nm. Laser light in this range is spectrally removed in the
transmission channel (Figure 2c) of the fiber pumping filter with
an optical isolation better than –35 dB in the broad range and bet-
ter than –40 dB at the actual laser line position. In the final device,
the laser attenuation was increased to >80 dB by combining two
filters of this type. The results of the measurements are shown
for a single filter due to limited dynamic range of the OSA. This
channel exhibits high transmission for the optical signal from
the QD with –0.7 dB loss above 1150 nm up to at least 1700 nm
(OSA detection limit) covering both the telecom O-band and C-
band. In the reflection channel, the transmission is high in the
range above 750 nm (loss lower than –4.2 dB, see Figure 2b) so
that the optical excitation can be delivered efficiently to the sam-
ple. The relatively high loss at the wavelength of the laser line
is not an issue in the case of single QDs as for the investigated
structures the emission is typically saturated at average excita-
tion powers in the single µW range (cf. Figure 3b). The next step
is to isolate a single optical transition from the other emission
signals related to the wetting layer, strain reducing layer, possible
Adv. Quantum Technol. 2020,3, 2000018 2000018 (3 of 9) © 2020 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.advquantumtech.com
Figure 2. Spectral characteristics of the fiber components measured with a supercontinuum light source and an OSA: a) Broad band-pass filter for the
excitation laser. b) Single-mode pumping filter—reflection channel through which the optical excitation is delivered to the sample after cleaning up its
spectrum with the filter presented in (a). c) Single-mode pumping filter—transmission channel through which the QD signal is delivered to the detection
system. The laser radiation is blocked by –40 dB. d) Single-mode narrow band-pass flat-top filter (0.6 nm full width at half maximum) with a central
wavelength of 1294.65 nm; inset: set of fiber-based narrow band-pass filters differing in the adjustable central wavelength covering a 2 nm spectral range
of 1293–1295 nm. All panels: The orange curves show the transmission of the investigated component with respect to the reference signal level and the
blue ones depict the OSA noise level.
defects, or other excitonic complexes confined in the same QD.
This functionality is realized by an ultra-narrow, top-flat, fiber-
integrated band-pass filter (0.6 nm) (see Figure 2d). To provide
some spectral flexibility, a set of seven exchangeable filters cov-
ering a wavelength range of 1293–1295 nm in the O-band with
isolation better than –45 dB was fabricated.
2.3. Device Performance
The optical properties of the stand-alone telecom single-photon
source are evaluated using a fiber-based Hanbury Brown and
Twiss configuration equipped with superconducting nanowire
single-photon photon detectors (SNSPDs). Figure 3a depicts the
corresponding coincidences’ histogram (black curve) obtained
under pulsed excitation at 80 MHz with an average excitation
power of 0.75 µW recorded at the laser input of the customized
fiber arrangement (T=40 K), which corresponds to 0.65 µW in-
cident on the sample. The measured histogram was fitted by the
sum of double-sided exponential decays for each maximum[17]
including the background level in between the emission pulses.
The peak height for the non-zero delay peaks determined from
the fitting procedure was further used to normalize the coin-
cidence events histogram to obtain the time delay-dependent
second-order correlation function g(2)(𝜏). The probability of
multiphoton emission events g(2)(0) was determined from the
fitting procedure as the ratio of the height of the central (zero
delay) peak and the peaks at the long time delays and yields
background-corrected g(2)(0) =0.15 ±0.05 proving single-photon
emission from the target optical transition. Here, the level of
uncorrelated background determined in between the emission
pulses is subtracted from the as measured g(2)(0) (see Experimen-
tal Section for details). This uncorrelated background signal is
mainly attributed to non-ideal laser suppression in the full-fiber
configuration. This issue can most probably be resolved by fur-
ther increasing the attenuation of the laser blocking filter in the
future. The associated photoluminescence (PL) spectrum of the
QD at the output of the SPS is shown in the inset of Figure 3a.
The emission is centered at 1294.7 nm, and the linewidth equals
0.43 nm which is a typical value for 1.3 µm QDs,[18,37] where the
quite significant inhomogeneous broadening is related mainly to
spectral diffusion effects in the case of non-resonant excitation.
At this excitation strength, the total photon flux yields 31 kHz at
the device output which, taking into account the 15% probability
of multiphoton events, corresponds to a true single-photon rate
of 27 kHz (Figure 3b) according to the study by Pelton et al.[38]
These rates were obtained by measuring the demonstrator’s
output using an external detection system and by correcting
it for the detection system’s efficiency. Therefore, this is the
actual single-photon rate that the end user will be provided with.
Under these excitation conditions, the probability of the source
to emit a single photon per excitation pulse is in the range of
Adv. Quantum Technol. 2020,3, 2000018 2000018 (4 of 9) © 2020 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.advquantumtech.com
Figure 3. Optical properties of the stand-alone SPS: a) Normalized coincidences histogram measured under pulsed non-resonant excitation (0.75 µW
average power at 80 MHz) in all-fiber configuration at T=40 K (black curve) together with a fitting curve (red); inset: corresponding spectrum measured
in all-fiber configuration including the fiber-based narrow band-pass filter (its bandwidth is marked with the dashed vertical lines). b) g(2)(0) (left scale,
blue symbols) and single-photon flux rate at the output of the demonstrator (right scale, red symbols), measured under pulsed non-resonant excitation
at T=40 K as a function of average excitation power; the blue dashed line marks the g(2)(0) =0.5 defining the limiting value for single-photon operation;
the error bars were obtained as the sum of the errors of fitting parameters. c) Stability test of the SPS: histogram of the count rates (averaged over
10 min) on one of the SNSPDs measured for 18 h. A statistical analysis yields a mean value of 1151 counts per second (cps) and a standard deviation
of 16 cps that corresponds to a relative standard deviation of 0.014.
1%. This value is limited by a combination of below-saturation
excitation, non-ideal internal quantum efficiency of the emitter,
non-ideal coupling efficiency into the fiber, and losses of the
all-fiber configuration as we discuss in Section 3 in more detail.
To investigate the upper limit of the achievable single-photon
flux in the present device, coincidences histograms were mea-
sured as a function of the average excitation power in the range
of 0.75 µW up to 10 µW. The corresponding power dependences
of g(2)(0)—blue symbols and single-photon flux—red symbols,
are presented in Figure 3b. The limit of single-photon emission
(g(2)(0) =0.5) is observed at 10 µW excitation power, suggesting
that at this excitation strength emission from the QD is already
saturated, and that a further increase of the excitation power
results in increased uncorrelated emission background overlap-
ping spectrally with the QD line. The associated maximal true
single-photon flux corresponding to the saturation of QD emis-
sion equals 73 kHz. Its excitation power dependence follows the
emission intensity dependence of the single QD transition.
During collection of the histogram at a given excitation power,
the photon count rate at the SNSPDs was monitored over 18
h to get an insight into the long-term stability of the output of
the source. The SNSPD detector count rates were averaged over
10 min and combined to generate the histogram presented in
Figure 3c. In comparison to the emission rates in Figure 3b,
this rate is decreased by the efficiency of the external detection
system, including fiber beam splitter, fiber connectors, and
quantum efficiency of the detectors themselves. The statistical
evaluation of these data yields a mean value of 1151 cps with a
standard deviation of 16 cps, which corresponds to the relative
standard deviation of 0.014. This shows that the long-term
stability of the demonstrator output is better than 1.5%.
3. Discussion and Outlook
For optimized performance, InGaAs QDs need to be cooled
down. To take advantage of the compact and cheap cooling
method provided by Stirling cryocoolers, a direct, rigid, and
thermally as well as mechanically stable fiber coupling of the
QD emission to a single-mode fiber was developed.[33] This
overcomes the drawback of low-frequency vibrations with the
amplitude in the range of a few micrometers exceeding the size
of the quantum emitter (at most tens of nanometers) inherent to
the operation of the Stirling cryocooler. The proposed solution
with superior performance is obtained by the interplay of vari-
ous developed components, pump laser, growth of high-quality
self-assembled QDs, and the design of a mesa-mirror-fiber-
setup based on numerical modeling, deterministic fabrication
of QD-mesas, advanced cooling method, specialty high-NA
fiber, high-precision fiber positioning, and customized fiber
components for spectral filtering. An important challenge of
our device concept is to deliver the excitation efficiently and
filter out the unwanted photons both from the pump laser and
emitted from other parts of the structure. High isolation of the
single transition is needed both in broad range as well as in a
narrow range. Due to relatively small binding energies (in the
range of 1 meV) of various excitonic complexes confined in
the same QD,[37] a very sharp-edge band-pass filter is required.
Even more important is the loss for the actual single-photon
signal. Commercially available elements can offer arbitrary
good isolation, but the insertion loss, especially if one has to
stack several of such elements with different functionalities, is
typically unacceptable with values in the range of 1.5 dB per
element for a signal from a single QD. Therefore, minimizing
the insertion loss of the fiber components was crucial for the
realization of the reported source. This can be further optimized
by using low loss splices instead of standard mating sleeves.
The achieved single-photon flux of the source in the range of
27–73 kHz, depending on the excitation conditions and required
single-photon purity (down to 0.15), is far beyond the state-of-the-
art for similar user-friendly sources: fiber-coupled and compact,
not requiring any external filtering, but providing the end user
with a train of single photons in a standard single-mode fiber
at the output. At shorter wavelengths (about 900 nm), a multi-
mode, fiber-coupled, and compact device was demonstrated.[32]
It featured a photon flux of 230 kHz into the multimode optical
fiber with g(2)(0) =0.57 under pulsed operation. In that case,
the single-photon character of emission could be demonstrated
under cw excitation with g(2)(0) equal to 0.07. When it comes
to fiber-coupled, QD-based, single-photon sources at telecom
Adv. Quantum Technol. 2020,3, 2000018 2000018 (5 of 9) © 2020 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.advquantumtech.com
wavelengths, first results were reported by Xu et al.[14] However,
this device was not fabricated deterministically and the reported
results were obtained at 4.2 K while dipping the device in a
liquid-helium storage dewar. For that source, the best obtained
g(2)(0) was equal to 0.2 under cw excitation and the source
efficiency was 3.75 ×10−5. Therefore, when compared to the
implementations above, the source reported here constitutes
a substantial improvement over state-of-the-art of any known
compact solutions.
The brightness of our single-photon source can certainly be
further optimized as the probability to have a single photon per
pulse is in the range of 1% currently. The achieved single-photon
flux is modest yet, when compared to QD-based but non-compact
sources at shorter wavelengths. However, the source characteris-
tics of the latter were measured at temperatures below 10 K, that
is, requiring complex liquid-helium-based experimental setups.
In addition, external spectral filtering had to be used to select a
single-photon transition, both making such a solution proof-of-
principle like rather than an application-relevant device.
Photon fluxes achieved for QDs at shorter wavelengths (100
MHz[31] or 143 MHz[39]) for 0.5 GHz optical and electrical excita-
tion show the high potential of QD-based single-photon sources.
In principle, they outperform other (laser-based) approaches
also at highly application-relevant telecom wavelengths. A low
source efficiency in our case is mostly related to the non-ideal
photon-extraction efficiency of the simple QD-micromesa and
internal quantum efficiency of the emitter. Even for an ideal
QD and the fully optimized mesa design, the maximum theo-
retically achievable outcoupling efficiency into the single-mode
fiber is in the range of 20%.[35] Therefore, more sophisticated
engineering of the photonic environment for maximizing the
extraction efficiency, in particular, bulls-eye cavity designs for
which efficiency exceeding 90% into low-NA collection optics is
predicted,[40] might be used to improve it in the next development
stages.
Applying a tunable narrow band-pass filter might also fur-
ther increase the flexibility and functionality of the entire device
concept. Also, for a good isolation of the single-photon emis-
sion from the scattered laser, the excitation wavelength has to be
significantly different than the QD emission range (by at least
100 nm for our device). Therefore, the strictly resonant or even
quasi-resonant excitation was at this stage not possible. It would
also be less practical as a very specific different wavelength of the
pump would be required for each QD and only one laser source
could be used for each device, which would decrease the univer-
sal character of this design, and would also increase substantially
the cost of the whole system, which is now mostly dictated by the
Stirling cryocooler and the excitation source. One has to keep in
mind that the coherence properties in the case of the investigated
structures will be in any case limited by the operation tempera-
ture (40 K) and not by the non-resonant excitation scheme. On
the other hand, it is straightforward to use our concept, which
can easily be transferred to optical above-bandgap and wetting-
layer excitation as well as electrically triggered structures where
the pump rejection is not required at all, so it depends only on
the availability of suitable QD emitters. The purity of the single
photons is determined by the QD material itself. Thus, it is a mat-
ter of choosing a properly isolated transition with low emission
background, which is not a limitation of the implemented con-
cept itself, but relies more on the development of high-quality
QD material at telecom wavelengths.[25]
4. Conclusion
We demonstrated a user-friendly, fully fiber-coupled triggered
source of single photons in the telecom O-band suitable for ap-
plications in long-range quantum communication schemes. The
single photons are emitted by a semiconductor QD, determinis-
tically integrated into a micromesa and on-chip coupled to a high
NA customized single-mode fiber. The QD sample is cooled by
a compact Stirling cryocooler at 40 K. The main ingredient of
the proposed solution are specially designed fiber components,
the deterministic in situ fabrication of mesa structures follow-
ing the numerically obtained structure design around the target
QD and an ultra-precise interferometric method for fiber align-
ment (accuracy below 50 nm) with respect to the mesa center.
Combining these developments resulted in a device performance
with a probability of multiphoton events as low as 15% and the
maximal single-photon generation rate at the single-mode fiber
output of 73 kHz. The obtained rate of generation of single pho-
tons is by two orders of magnitude larger than the ≈0.7 kHz
reported by Schlehahn et al.[32] for a multimode, fiber-coupled,
stand-alone SPS based on a standard InGaAs QD emitting in
the 900–950 nm wavelength range. This highlights the signifi-
cant advances achieved in the present work, which not only pro-
vides a fully fiber-based solution, but also demonstrates single-
mode operation in the O-band—all of which are crucial prerequi-
sites for real-world device applications, for example, in the field
of quantum communication. The long-term stability of the op-
tical output of the stand-alone SPS is better than 1.5% (stan-
dard deviation). Our user-friendly device concept does not re-
quire a supply of cryogenic liquids; is robust; and provides a hard-
ware solution being compact, mechanically stable, and portable.
It does not require any additional adjustments or post selection
of the single photons by the user as the filtering fiber systems
are already integrated. Therefore, the end user can operate the
source in a plug&play fashion, as at the output, it has a standard
telecommunication single-mode fiber that delivers the train of
triggered single photons at 1294.7 nm for the used QD. Notewor-
thy, our approach is independent of the material used and can be
adapted to different spectral ranges. The limiting factors are the
structural quality of the QD material and the spatial QD density.
Additionally, the possibility of tuning the QD-based SPSs with
external strain and static electric field[41,42] as well as electrical
excitation[43] could be easily integrated in our source, rendering
its application potential even larger. Therefore, these results pave
the way to real-word application of QD-based fiber quantum net-
works.
5. Experimental Section
Sample Growth:The QDs were formed by self-organization during
metalorganic chemical vapor deposition in the Stranski–Krastanov growth
mode. Starting with a GaAs wafer, first, the bottom distributed Bragg re-
flector with 15 pairs of GaAs/Al0.9Ga0.1As layers with 98.3/113.8 nm thick-
ness on a 300 nm GaAs buffer was grown at 700 °C followed by a 505.4 nm
thick additional GaAs layer. For the growth of the QD layer, the temperature
Adv. Quantum Technol. 2020,3, 2000018 2000018 (6 of 9) © 2020 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.advquantumtech.com
was decreased down to 500 °C. The active region constitutes of InGaAs
QDs (formed from 2.5 monolayers (ML) of InGaAs with 66% In content
and flushed with 1 ML of GaAs) and is followed by a 5.5 nm thick InGaAs
strain-reducing layer with an In gradient from 30% at the bottom down to
10% at the top. After initial capping with 2 nm of GaAs, the final capping
layer consisting of 612.7 nm of GaAs is grown at 615 °C.
In Situ Electron-Beam Lithography:The applied fiber positioning
method[33,44] requires that a single QD is located with high accuracy in the
center of a micrometer-sized nanophotonic structure. For that purpose, in
situ electron-beam lithography (EBL)[45] optimized for 1.3 µm emission
wavelength and with an overall positioning accuracy below 50 nm[34] was
utilized. In this procedure 310 ±2 nm of chemical semi amplified EBL
resist (measured by ellipsometry) diluted to a solid content of 6.5% was
spin coated on the sample surface. Next, the sample was mounted in the
in situ EBL system and cooled down to cryogenic temperatures (15 K). At
first, the cathodoluminescence mapping was performed with 40 ms inte-
gration time for each pixel to identify the most suitable QDs for further
processing. The criteria at this step are the spatial isolation of the QD, the
emission intensity, and the spectral range of emission. In this context, it
is important to note that QD emission needs to fit within the bandwidth
of the fiber band-pass filters which span in the range of 1293–1295 nm.
The mapping dose must be below the onset dose for inverting the resist
and in this particular processing, 8 mC cm−2was used. After identifying a
suitable QD, the lithography step was performed still at cryogenic temper-
atures within the same in situ EBL system. The resist was exposed using
25 mC cm−2electron dose and single cylindrical mesa structures were pat-
terned in each writing field. The nominal diameters of the mesas on this
sample are 1050, 1075, and 1090 nm, and the mesa height (corresponding
to etching depth) equals to 620 ±5 nm. Further processing was performed
at room temperature in the cleanroom. It included resist development and
dry etching (reactive ion etching) of the patterned structures. Afterwards,
scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in top-view configuration (no tilt an-
gle) was performed to determine the actual mesa diameters and the etch-
ing depth was verified via profilometer measurements.
Positioning of the Fiber with Respect to the Mesa:For positioning of the
optimized high-NA single-mode fiber with respect to the mesa center prior
to gluing a zirconia ferrule with the fiber to the sample surface, an interfer-
ometric method detailed by ˙
Zołnacz et al.[33,44] was used. The alignment
procedure was performed at room temperature which, importantly, does
not rely on the actual QD signal (which is not detectable at room tempera-
ture), but takes advantage of the deterministic character of the mesa struc-
ture fabrication with a single QD in the center. The position of the fiber
was adjusted for the center of the mesa based on measurements of the
topography of the sample utilizing the interference between the spectrally
broad signal from a supercontinuum light source reflected from the fiber
facet and the surface of the sample dependent on the distance between
the fiber and the sample surface. Both the fiber and the sample surface
were first positioned horizontally using piezo actuators and the fiber was
further moved across the sample surface at constant distance. The analy-
sis of the spectral interference fringes allowed us to position the fiber with
respect to the mesa center with 50 nm accuracy (for micromesas with di-
ameters smaller than 2 µm), that is, with a deviation much smaller than
the diameter (2.5 µm) of the single-mode fiber core. After having aligned
the fiber with respect to the mesa center leaving an air gap between mesa
and fiber end facet of about 0.5 µm, the fiber was set in physical contact
with the sample surface which is crucial for long-term mechanical and ther-
mal stability. Then the fiber ferrule was glued to the sample surface with
ceramic UV-cured glue exhibiting a low thermal expansion coefficient of
only 14 ppm °C−1(compared to the GaAs coefficient of 5.73 ppm °C−1). It
is important to note that this glue is not transparent in the spectral range
of interest, so it was only applied outside the ferrule leaving the fiber end
facet and the mesa top surface free of any glue.
Fiber Components:The fiber components specially designed for the
presented single-photon source include a single-mode fiber with high
(0.42) numerical aperture, broad band-pass filter to remove/suppress un-
wanted spontaneous emission background of the pulsed laser source, a
fiber filter responsible for delivering the optical excitation to the sample (re-
flection channel) as well as spectrally suppressing it out from the detection
Table 1. Parameters of the specialty fiber filters.
Parameter Pumping filter Narrow
band-pass filter
Transmission
channel
Reflection channel
Maximal
insertion
loss [dB]
0.70 4.20 (single-mode)
1.80 (multimode)
0.50
Bandwidth
[nm]
1150 ÷ 1600 785 ÷ 1000 Central wave-
length ±0.3
Laser
attenuation
[dB]
>40 (per chip) >2.50
path to provide high transmission for the actual QD signal (transmission
channel), and finally a narrow band-pass filter (0.6 nm) for selecting the
target emission line of the fiber-coupled QD. Additionally, the customized
fiber coupled to the QD has to be spliced with a standard telecom fiber to
provide an easy-to-integrate output of the device. The transmission of each
component was evaluated with respect to the reference measurement in
which a tested component was exchanged with a simple patch cord to ac-
count for spectral characteristics of the source and the detection system.
Additionally, the noise level of the OSA itself was measured each time for
illustrating the dynamic range of the detector to verify whether it is large
enough or the result of the measurements constitutes only a lower limit
of the isolation provided by the respective fiber element.
The customized fiber was optimized in terms of numerical aperture and
residual thermal stress for safe operation at cryogenic temperatures. The
high numerical aperture (NA =0.42) was achieved by using a highly Ge-
doped core with 40 mol% of GeO2. Such a high level of doping results in
a huge difference of thermal expansion coefficients between the core and
the cladding of the fiber that might lead to fiber breaking either during fab-
rication of the fiber or cooling it down for low-temperature measurements
of the QD signal. To reduce the stress level, a fiber with a three-step doping
profile (40, 13, and 5 mol%), resulting in the similar refractive index pro-
file (1:2:3 diameter ratios), was fabricated following the design obtained
via the finite-element method simulations. This approach resulted in a nu-
merical aperture of 0.42 with a cut-off wavelength for single-mode opera-
tion of 1050 nm for a fiber with 2.5 µm core diameter. The customized fiber
was terminated with a zirconia ferrule polished into the spherical end-face.
It was glued directly to the QD-micromesa and further sealed by an epoxy
glue in a specially designed vacuum feedthrough to a portable Stirling cry-
ocooler. The customized fiber has to be further spliced to a standard tele-
com single-mode fiber (core diameter of 9 µm) and the main challenge
here is to overcome the 3.6 factor between the fiber core diameters. A low-
loss splice (0.2 dB in both directions) was achieved using glass processing
station with CO2laser splicer via the thermal core expansion technique
that relies on equalizing the fiber core diameters by controlled heating of
the splice area causing the GeO2dopant from the core to diffuse to the
cladding, eventually creating a gradual low loss splice.
All filters were fabricated in the thin film filter (TFF) technology. The
band-pass filters have a bandwidth of 0.6 nm with a flat-top characteristic
that is important to maximize the emission line transmission through the
filter. It is also possible to fabricate filters with a different bandwidth down
to 0.3 nm (at the expense of higher loss of 1.2 dB). For their fabrication,
a commercially available TFF chip was used and the central wavelength
of the actual filter can be tuned by 2 nm via the angle of incidence on the
chip that can be tuned on the fabrication stage of the filter. The tuning
range of the central wavelength is limited by the change in the shape of
the bandwidth and polarization selectivity appearing for high angles of
incidence to 2 nm at maximum and 1 nm in practice. The parameters of
the fiber filters are summed up in Table 1.
Adv. Quantum Technol. 2020,3, 2000018 2000018 (7 of 9) © 2020 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.advquantumtech.com
The characteristics of the fiber filters (see Figure 2) were measured
using fiber-coupled supercontinuum light source (NKT Photonics SuperK
Versa) and an OSA (Yokogawa AQ6370B) covering the spectral range
of 600–1700 nm. The transmission of the filters was determined as
a difference between the transmission of setup with the filter and a
reference measurement in which the filter was replaced by a fiber patch
cord. Additionally, the noise level of the OSA was measured showing in
which cases the measurement results (in particular signal attenuation by
the filter) are limited by the sensitivity of the detection system itself. In
this case, only the lower limit for the attenuation can be determined due
to limited dynamic range of the detector.
Experimental Setup—Spectroscopy Measurements:In general, two ex-
perimental configurations were used for the spectroscopy study of the SPS.
The common part of the two configurations was the fiber-glued sample
mounted in the Stirling cryocooler (base temperature 38 K) with optical
excitation (laser output filtered with the broad band-pass filter) delivered
via the customized fiber pumping filter. The non-resonant excitation of
the investigated QD structures was realized using an electrically triggered,
fiber-coupled, semiconductor diode laser that was custom-designed by Pi-
coQuant. The laser was built around a preselected laser diode emitting
at 805 nm. Special driving electronics permit freely selectable repetition
rates up to 100 MHz using internal or even external triggering. The laser
emits pulses with a pulse width of <50 ps (full width at half maximum)
with average power of a few milliwatts, which can be further reduced by
a built-in computer-controlled attenuator allowing to adjust the excitation
power to the requirements of the QD structures. The difference in the two
experimental configurations appears in the way the signal from the sam-
ple was filtered spectrally. For the pre-characterization of emission from
the sample, the optical signal was out-coupled from the output port of
the fiber filter for pumping to free space and filtered spectrally via a 0.32
m focal length spectrometer with 600 grooves mm–1 grating blazed at
1000 nm, providing 0.4 nm bandwidth at its output. The PL signal was fur-
ther coupled to the single-mode fiber connected to a single-photon count-
ing module (superconducting NbN nanowire detector with 20% quantum
efficiency—SNSPD). This configuration was used to measure PL spectra of
the QD in a broad spectral range to identify proper excitation conditions
for autocorrelation measurements and, in particular, to select a proper
band-pass filter for the second, all-fiber configuration. For the measure-
ments on the actual fully fiber-coupled device, the output of the pumping
filter was connected to the narrow band-pass filter and further via the out-
put connector of the stand-alone SPS to a 50:50 beam splitter based on
single-mode fibers. Each output of the beam splitter was then connected
to a SNSPD for autocorrelation measurements that were carried out us-
ing a multichannel picosecond event timer (PicoHarp 300) with 256 ps
time-bin width. The measured histograms were fitted with the following
function[17]
g(2)
fit (𝜏)=gbg +gautof(|𝜏|)+∑
n≠0
f(|
|𝜏−nT0|
|)(1)
where gbg corresponds to the background counts, gauto indicates figure of
merit—g(2)(0), and f(𝜏) is the normalized biexponential function with T0
being the distance between the consecutive pulses (corresponding to the
repetition rate of the excitation laser) that describe the autocorrelation be-
tween the photons emitted within different pulses. The peak height for the
non-zero delay peaks determined from the fitting procedure was further
used to normalize the coincidence events histogram to obtain the time
delay-dependent second-order correlation function g(2)(𝜏).
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the FI-SEQUR project jointly financed by the
European Regional Development Fund (EFRE) of the European Union
in the framework of the programme to promote research, innovation,
and technologies (Pro FIT) in Germany, and the National Centre for Re-
search and Development in Poland within the 2nd Poland-Berlin Photon-
ics Programme, grant number 2/POLBER-2/2016 (project value 2 089 498
PLN). Support from the German Science Foundation via CRC 787, from
the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, BMBF, grant number
05M20ZBM, and from the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange
is also acknowledged.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords
III-V semiconductor epitaxial quantum dots, fiber elements design and
fabrication, photon statistics, quantum communication, quantum-dot-
based devices, quantum optics, single-photon sources
Received: February 10, 2020
Revised: March 26, 2020
Published online: May 11, 2020
[1] D. Bouwmeester, A. Ekert, A. Zeilinger, The Physics of Quantum Infor-
mation, Springer, Berlin 2000.
[2] N. Sangouard, C. Simon, J. Mináˇ
r, H. Zbinden, H. de Riedmatten, N.
Gisin, Phys.Rev.A2007,76, 050301.
[3] H. J. Kimble, Nature 2008,453, 1023.
[4] J. L. O’Brien, Science 2007,318, 1567.
[5] D.J.Brod,E.F.Galvão,A.Crespi,R.Osellame,N.Spagnolo,F.Scia-
rrino, Adv. Photonics 2019,1, 034001.
[6] T. Heindel, C. A. Kessler, M. Rau, C. Schneider, M. Fürst, F. Hargart,
W.-M. Schulz, M. Eichfelder, R. Roßbach, S. Nauerth, M. Lermer, H.
Weier, M. Jetter, M. Kamp, S. Reitzenstein, S. Höfling, P. Michler, H.
Weinfurter, A. Forchel, New J. Phys. 2012,14, 083001.
[7] M. Lucamarini, Z. L. Yuan, J. F. Dynes, A. J. Shields, Nature 2018,557,
400.
[8] M. Sasaki, M. Fujiwara, H. Ishizuka, W. Klaus, K. Wakui, M. Takeoka,
S. Miki, T. Yamashita, Z. Wang, A. Tanaka, K. Yoshino, Y. Nambu, S.
Takahashi, A. Tajima, A. Tomita, T. Domeki, T. Hasegawa, Y. Sakai, H.
Kobayashi, T. Asai, K. Shimizu, T. Tokura, T. Tsurumaru, M. Matsui,
T. Honjo, K. Tamaki, H. Takesue, Y. Tokura, J. F. Dynes, A. R. Dixon
et al., Opt. Express 2011,19, 10387.
[9] H.-L. Yin, T.-Y. Chen, Z.-W. Yu, H. Liu, L.-X. You, Y.-H. Zhou, S.-J. Chen,
Y. Mao, M.-Q. Huang, W.-J. Zhang, H. Chen, M. J. Li, D. Nolan, F.
Zhou, X. Jiang, Z. Wang, Q. Zhang, X.-B. Wang, J.-W. Pan, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 2016,117, 190501.
[10] R. Dixon, Z. L. Yuan, J. F. Dynes, A. W. Sharpe, A. J. Shields, Opt.
Express 2008,16, 18790.
[11] X.-S. Ma, T. Herbst, T. Scheidl, D. Wang, S. Kropatschek, W. Naylor, B.
Wittmann, A. Mech, J. Kofler, E. Anisimova, V. Makarov, T. Jennewein,
R. Ursin, A. Zeilinger, Nature 2012,489, 269.
[12] S.-K.Liao,W.-Q.Cai,J.Handsteiner,B.Liu,J.Yin,L.Zhang,D.Rauch,
M. Fink, J.-G. Ren, W.-Y. Liu, Y. Li, Q. Shen, Y. Cao, F.-Z. Li, J.-F. Wang,
Y.-M.Huang,L.Deng,T.Xi,L.Ma,T.Hu,L.Li,.N.-L.Liu,F.Koidl,P.
Wang, Y.-A. Chen, X.-B. Wang, M. Steindorfer, G. Kirchner, C.-Y. Lu,
R. Shu, R. Ursin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018,120, 030501.
[13] L. Schweickert, K. D. Jöns, K. D. Zeuner, S. F. Covre da Silva, H.
Huang, T. Lettner, M. Reindl, J. Zichi, R. Trotta, A. Rastelli, V. Zwiller,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018,112, 093106.
[14] X. Xu, F. Brossard, K. Hammura, D. A. Williams, B. Alloing, L. H. Li,
A. Fiore, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008,93, 021124.
Adv. Quantum Technol. 2020,3, 2000018 2000018 (8 of 9) © 2020 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.advquantumtech.com
[15] M. B. Ward, O. Z. Karimov, D. C. Unitt, Z. L. Yuan, P. See, D. G.
Gevaux, A. J. Shields, P. Atkinson, D. A. Ritchie, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005,
86, 201111.
[16] C. Zinoni, B. Alloing, C. Monat, V. Zwiller, L. H. Li, A. Fiore, L. Lunghi,
A. Gerardino, H. de Riedmatten, H. Zbinden, N. Gisin, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 2006,88, 131102.
[17] T. Miyazawa, K. Takemoto, Y. Nambu, S. Miki, T. Yamashita, H. Terai,
M. Fujiwara, M. Sasaki, Y. Sakuma, M. Takatsu, T. Yamamoto, Y.
Arakawa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016,109, 132106.
[18] M. Paul, J. Kettler, K. Zeuner, C. Clausen, M. Jetter, P. Michler, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 2015,106, 122105.
[19] Ł. Dusanowski, P. Holewa, A. Mary´
nski, A. Musiał, T. Heuser, N.
Srocka, D. Quandt, A. Strittmatter, S. Rodt, J. Misiewicz, S. Reitzen-
stein, G. S˛
ek, Opt. Express 2017,25, 31122.
[20] M. Benyoucef, M. Yacob, J. P. Reithmaier, J. Kettler, P. Michler, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 2013,103, 162101.
[21] A. Musiał, P. Holewa, P. Wyborski, M. Syperek, A. Kors, J. P. Re-
ithmaier, G. S ˛
ek, M. Benyoucef, Adv. Quantum Technol. 2020,3,
1900082.
[22] S. L. Portalupi, M. Jetter, P. Michler, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2019,34,
053001.
[23] P. Michler, Quantum Dots for Quantum Information Technologies,
Springer, Cham, Switzerland 2017.
[24] P. Lodahl, Quantum Sci. Technol. 2018,3, 013001.
[25] X. Cao, M. Zopf, F. Ding, J. Semicond. 2019,40, 071901.
[26] A. Muller, H. Zbinden, N. Gisin, Europhys. Lett. 1996,33, 335.
[27] S. Wengerowsky, S. K. Joshi, F. Steinlechner, J. R. Zichi, S. M. Dobro-
volskiy, R. van der Molen, J. W. N. Los, V. Zwiller, M. A. M. Versteegh,
A. Mura, D. Calonico, M. Inguscio, H. Hübel, L. Bo, T. Scheidl, A.
Zeilinger, A. Xuereb, R. Ursin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019,116,
6684.
[28] A. Boaron, G. Boso, D. Rusca, C. Paul Vulliez, C. Autebert, M. Caloz,
M. Perrenoud, G. Gras, F. Bussières, M.-J. Li, D. Nolan, A. Martin, H.
Zbinden, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018,121, 190502.
[29] G. Brassard, N. Lütkenhaus, T. Mor, B. C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. Lett.
2000,85, 1330.
[30] Z. Xiang, J. Huwer, R. M. Stevenson, J. S. Szymanska, M. B. Ward, I.
Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, A. J. Shields, presented at Conf. on Lasers and
Electro-Optics, OSA Technical Digest, CLEO: QELS_Fundamental
Science 2019, San Jose, California United States, 5–10 May 2019, pa-
per FM4C.6.
[31] Quandela homepage, http://quandela.com/ (accessed: December
2019).
[32] A. Schlehahn, S. Fischbach, R. Schmidt, A. Kaganskiy, A. Strittmatter,
S. Rodt, T. Heindel, S. Reitzenstein, Sci. Rep. 2018,8, 1340.
[33] K. ˙
Zołnacz, A. Musiał, N. Srocka, J. Große, M. J. Schlösinger, P.-I.
Schneider, O. Kravets, M. Mikulicz, J. Olszewski, K. Poturaj, G. Wój-
cik, P. Mergo, K. Dybka, M. Dyrkacz, M. Dłubek, S. Rodt, S. Burger, L.
Zschiedrich, G. S˛
ek, S. Reitzenstein, W. Urba´
nczyk, Opt. Express 2019,
27, 26772.
[34] N. Srocka, A. Musiał, P.-I. Schneider, P. Mrowi´
nski, P. Holewa, S.
Burger, D. Quandt, A. Strittmatter, S. Rodt, S. Reitzenstein, G. S ˛
ek,
AIP Adv. 2018,8, 085205.
[35] P.-I. Schneider, N. Srocka, S. Rodt, L. Zschiedrich, S. Reitzenstein, S.
Burger, Opt. Express 2018,26, 8479.
[36] P.-I. Schneider, X. G. Santiago, V. Soltwisch, M. Hammerschmidt, S.
Burger, C. Rockstuhl, ACS Photonics 2019,6, 2726.
[37] P. Mrowi´
nski, A. Musiał, K. Gawarecki, Ł. Dusanowski, T. Heuser, N.
Srocka, D. Quandt, A. Strittmatter, S. Rodt, S. Reitzenstein, G. S˛
ek,
Phys. Rev. B 2019,100, 115310.
[38] M. Pelton, C. Santori, J. Vuc˘
kovi´
c, B. Zhang, G. S. Solomon, J. Plant,
Y. Yamamoto, Phys.Rev.Lett.2002,89, 233602.
[39] A. Schlehahn, M. Gaafar, M. Vaupel, M. Gschrey, P. Schnauber, J.-H.
Schulze, S. Rodt, A. Strittmatter, W. Stolz, A. Rahimi-Iman, T. Heindel,
M. Koch, S. Reitzenstein, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015,107, 041105.
[40] L. Rickert, T. Kupko, S. Rodt, S. Reitzenstein, T. Heindel, Opt. Express
2019,27, 36824.
[41] B. Höfer, F. Olbrich, J. Kettler, M. Paul, J. Höschele, M. Jetter, S. L. Por-
talupi, F. Ding, P. Michler, O. G. Schmidt, AIP Adv. 2019,9, 085112.
[42] Z.-H.Xiang,J.Huwer,J.Skiba-Szymanska,R.M.Stevenson,D.J.P.El-
lis, I. Farrer, M. B. Ward, D. A. Ritchie, A. J. Shields, arXiv:1909.12222,
2019.
[43] M. B. Ward, T. Farrow, P. See, Z. L. Yuan, O. Z. Karimov, A. J. Bennett,
A. J. Shields, P. Atkinson, K. Cooper, D. A. Ritchie, Appl. Phys. Lett.
2007,90, 063512.
[44] K. ˙
Zołnacz, W. Urba´
nczyk, N. Srocka, T. Heuser, D. Quandt, A.
Strittmatter, S. Rodt, S. Reitzenstein, A. Musiał, P. Mrowi´
nski, G. S˛
ek,
K. Poturaj, G. Wójcik, P. Mergo, K. Dybka, M. Dyrkacz, M. Dłubek,
Proc. SPIE 2018,10674, 106741R.
[45] M. Gschrey, A. Thoma, P. Schnauber, M. Seifried, R. Schmidt, B.
Wohlfeil, L. Krüger, J.-H. Schulze, T. Heindel, S. Burger, F. Schmidt,
A. Strittmatter, S. Rodt, S. Reitzenstein, Nat. Commun. 2015,6, 7662.
Adv. Quantum Technol. 2020,3, 2000018 2000018 (9 of 9) © 2020 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim